In that case, i'll double my efforts to rise up the ladder and block you. Because I like cotton and cotton/poly blend leg coverings too, but I can't allow the taking away of leg covering diversity. Grr.
There is something wrong with you. Clearly you missed the part where I said "under the hem of the skirt." Zettai ryouiki exists in this fashion. Garters are different, they're worn UNDER the clothing, that's what makes them hawt.
You fail.
Clarification: I'm not here to take away leg covering diversity. I like socks, I like stockings, I like garters, leg coverings for all! But zettai ryouiki with anything other than socks, made from sock fabric, is not zettai ryouiki and cannot be claimed as such. It's like how the name "champagne" is now restricted to sparkling wine made in the Champagne region of France, or how the town of Cheddar in England is moving to trademark Cheddar cheese.
If you're wearing stockings they should be gartered, because goddammit, it's not zettai ryouiki if anything can be seen. It's the fucking gap that does it, people, the GAP, and failing to sock properly means that you're depriving the rest of us. It is unfair and should not be.
I'll put in an addendum to the bill that states garters are acceptable when worn with stockings in the zettai ryouiki style, but they must be worn together when worn. Fair?