In my books; the current 4 people most likely to be sinners are, in my holy opinion:
ActionDan - On account of being the biggest lurker
PX - On account of staying in the shadows and being unhelpful when he did emerge
Serela - Lack of scumhunting, only being defensive.
Zakeri - Lack of scumhunting in general; although I could certainly prefer a Serela lynch over Zakeri at this point. Probably because Serela has more content that amounts to OMGUS and waffles.
Of these, I would most prefer an ActionDan lynch; which is why that is where my vote for condemnation is currently situated. Lurking in the shadows to his degree is more often the actions of a sinner [Specifically Sloth. Maybe Pride too; too Prideful to speak with us!] than a saint.
While I have cast some suspicion onto Dormio and Polaris, I do not believe them as bad as the prior four, and the congregation should attempt to condemn those
most likly to be sinners at this point.
I hope that whatever the overall consensus is, that we end the day saying Hallelujah; not mourning.
I am writing this post in a rush because I have witnessed a statement [50] that I cannot ignore.
What makes you so certain that two DeLurks would amount to a mislynch? Do you have access to information that would indicate to you that the two DeLurk motions I have presented would be equivalent in result to a mislynch? Are you withholding information from the players regarding the alignment of the lurkers?
As per Article 3 [12], the unvote that would normally be placed here has been excluded.
##Vote: SB
I find this strange as well. If 1 mistaken delurk can result in Day2 MYLO; a second on Day 2 would effectively turn it into LYLO. I see no situation where this makes an 'exrra mislynch' unless we Delurk Scum.
That said, at the same time Dormio, what makes SB's statement not pass for ignorance, and instead be judged as malice, when Serela's actions are not? This seems inconsistent.
Ninja'ed:
?
It's maths.
7/2, if we mislynch 3 times we lose.
If we 'lynch' twice a day (one lynch, one delurk), we get four chances to lynch scum (because the two deaths on D2 occur simultaneously, in spite of it being 4/2 potential MYLO.)
Town control 4 deaths here, while scum control 2 (meaning we essentially steal one of their nightkills from them compared to just lynching every day/scum killing every night).
My gut reaction to this vote is that it's kinda scummy.
Cows moo with regional accents.
Missed Delurk + Mislynch + nightkill = 2/4.
We could quite easily be lulled into false security with a Delurk attempt in MYLO. The other scum could grant Amnesty at the twilight hours as we mislynch and proceed to lose, while simultaneously not attempting to lynch the scumbuddy because we're attempting to Smite them.
And if we're attempting to Smite a townie Day 2, the Sinners could use it to improve their situation, even if we're about to lynch scum. After all; the Delurk from someone about to be lynched would still count.
Delurk is too risky.