Firstly, I would like to thank the moderator for the additions of articles 1 [10], 2 [11], and 3 [12]. Now, moving onto more pressing matters, I would again like to address Serela. Disregarding Serela's first serious vote on myself [9b] being terrible in and of itself, his second serious vote [13] is yet another OMGUS vote.
Also, before I continue, I feel the need to correct Raikaria and Serela regarding their posts [14] [15] that a set number for majorities and the concept of a hammer does not exist for the purposes of this game as per rule 5. [16]
With regards to Serela, I am of the opinion that whilst Serela is a terrible person for being unable to follow the basic rules that have been laid out for us by the moderator in order to maintain a civil discussion. However, I am also of the opinion that this does not necessarily doom Serela to the pits of hell.
Serela certainly does himself no favors with his most recent post [17] wherein he states a series of opinions with minimal justification for aforementioned opinions and his overall play leaves a lot to be desired, but despite this my professional opinion is that Serela's behaviors can be explained through stupidity and negligence as opposed to malicious intent.
Whilst this would be where I would normally place an unvote, in accordance with article 3 [12], I shall abstain from this action as the moderator has deemed it unnecessary.
##Vote: BT
Following my previous line of questioning towards BT [18a] [18b], his vote on SB [6] seems quite lazy to me. His followup vote on Serela [19] further builds this sentiment that BT is not actively attempting to find the traitors in our midst that would prefer to live in a world without rules to govern our behaviors and instead looking for easy targets for the lynch.
PX's behaviors [20] also display a similar level of apathy however given that he has only made the one post he may still be acting within rule 3 [1] and so I intend on pursuing this line of thought at a later time.
[1] 3. Every first post must contain a ##VOTE: on a living player.
[6] I'm a rogue. Wanna see what I can do to you with a tongue depresser? Because that's what you're gonna get for being third on the wagon.
[9b] I also ##Vote:Dormio for immense drudgery, I forgot how wonderful you are!
[10] Persons registered for a forum account at the domain "shrinemaiden.org" and its associated domains have the right to become a "Player" in the game "Mafia of the Kaleidoscope" hosted by Bardiche, hereafter referred to as "Moderator." All following articles apply to all persons who have become "Players" in the game, by submitting a registration accepted by the Moderator, unless otherwise determined by the "Role PM", containing all relevant role information.
[11] Every Player has the right to submit a post on the message board hosted at "shrinemaiden.org", in the topic numbered 21626, otherwise known as the "game thread." Such posts may only be made during the 48 hours referred to as "Day Phase" per the rules submitted by the Moderator. Exceptions apply only if and in case of such clauses being made available in the "Rules." If not otherwise determined, this article automatically applies.
[12] Dormio is a dick and this is why we cannot have fun things. I don't need unvotes, I'm a big boy and I can count votes.
[13] Actually, seriously, why is this? BT just threw a fourth vote on me with nothing more than "let's see what this does!" He had more of a reason to vote Polly but he didn't feel like it, so he jumped on the big fat bandwagon literally Just Because! Hmmmmm...
[14] As someone has said to me at confessionals before, one would have to be a fool to panic about being at L-1 so early into D1. A scum quickhammer would basically be throwing the game away for them.
[15] W-wait, how did I suddenly end up at majority minus one?
[16] 5. Town is NOT required to reach a majority to Lynch. At the end of the Day, all votes are tallied and whoever has the most votes will be killed! There is no "hammer" vote, i.e. the Day will not end due to having a majority of votes on someone.
[17] Raikaria looks 100% fine, Zak's posts are kind of bare which isn't great but unlike px/bt I don't think his vote looks actively scummy, so he could still go either way, solidly neutral/not enough to form a read. Confirming to your demands makes me such a good person!
[18a] In addition to my prior request to the moderator [5], I request that BT also provide a response regarding his post [6]. I wish for clarification on whether the referred post [6] is one that you have submitted as a serious vote or if you wish to waive that vote by quoting rule 3 [1].
[18b] Sure it was.
[19] Let's see what this pill does.
[20] Serela your responses are not helping so I shall be here to help instead! (...) Now let's see how many people aren't paying attention to the game