| ~Beyond the Border~ > Akyu's Arcade |
| Cardboard rehab: TCG/CCG thread |
| << < (198/200) > >> |
| commandercool:
So is it just me or is Gorm The Great from Battlebond very confusing? "Gorm the Great must be blocked if able, and Gorm must be blocked by two or more creatures if able." What? So if I have three creatures do they all have to block him? Or do just two have to block him? Either way I feel like that should have been worded differently. |
| MatsuriSakuragi:
Just have 2. It would be better worded as "must be blocked by 2 or more creatures, and must be blocked if able". |
| Mеа:
--- Quote from: Matsuri on May 22, 2018, 02:25:51 PM ---It would be better worded as "must be blocked by 2 or more creatures, and must be blocked if able". --- End quote --- Although this makes it sound like it wouldn't be blockable if you only have 1 creature, whereas the original text sounds to me like you can block it with just 1 creature if that's all you have available to block with. |
| hyorinryu:
My box came today. Now to find people to open it with. |
| MatsuriSakuragi:
--- Quote from: Mеа on May 22, 2018, 02:34:33 PM ---Although this makes it sound like it wouldn't be blockable if you only have 1 creature, whereas the original text sounds to me like you can block it with just 1 creature if that's all you have available to block with. --- End quote --- It makes it sound that way because it can't be blocked by just 1 creature. The reason why I flipped it is because "can't be blocked unless blocked by 2 or more creatures" is Menace and I'm not sure why they didn't just label it as such since Menace is more or less an evergreen mechanic. So Menace already establishes that it can only be blocked by 2 or more, and the second bit says that opponents don't have a choice, they MUST block with at least 2 if they have 2 or more. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |