Author Topic: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (The Last Stand) (Contains Lots of Images)  (Read 30585 times)

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #150 on: August 03, 2015, 09:12:54 AM »
Eh, I had some more stuff here but I just removed them since I figured the answers wouldn't help anyone.

Mostly due to any EDX play and the decision to more or less claim cop on D2.  The only thing I may have taken issue on was his murrin vote D1 but that's not exactly criminal.
Explain what you liked about my ED1 play? I was completely off point that day since I hate D1s. I wouldn't say I really started figuring out the game until D2 so I'm surprised you townread me off those posts?

I guess a similar question for BT. Could you point out some of the things you think hit townie triggers for you from me? I guess I'm being a little unnerved at being townread so easily because it's easier for me to figure out someone's alignment when I'm talking to them instead of watching two guys talk to each other.

Looking at DNA's posting on the day of the Serela lynch is interesting and once again reminds me why I wish he was still in the game so I could ask him stuff like: why want to lynch Dan over Serela as a "policy lynch"?

I still have yet to go through scum scenarios for both of you so I can reconcile some of the early game interactions and vote decisions. I wouldn't mind a 24 hour extension because it's exhausting posting right before sleep every day.



On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #151 on: August 03, 2015, 09:14:27 AM »
Actually I just realized I'll probably have a nice chunk of time tomorrow for the game that I don't usually have so yeah, I'm going to sleep and coming back then.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #152 on: August 03, 2015, 05:26:09 PM »
Not sure what you mean by your post about Dan seldomly posting? Dan is usually a low volume poster regardless of alignment.
That's what I said in the post though. Dan usually doesn't post enough but is it despite following the game? Because he certainly followed the game here but with an inappropriate amount of content. Maybe that's just a meta point for Dan, but it still doesn't match my vision of stagnating Town Dan. I got the feeling from his posts that he was following the game closely and it's probably because he's the last scum. I'll confirm it now.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #153 on: August 03, 2015, 05:29:12 PM »
Even regardless of this I think it's a strong point against Dan that he hasn't proactively looked for scum since... when? I don't know since when actually. It's easy to say "yeah but that's because he thinks Conq is obvtown" but that's an easy pass, he should have at least shown signs of mulling it over, maybe rereading Conq and coming to the conclusion that he's town, maybe rethinking how DNA's role might actually strongly suggest that he's town, but none of that was really happening.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #154 on: August 03, 2015, 06:05:12 PM »
I ended up reading Town Mafia first which doesn't help because it's not an example of lurking Dan, it's an example of Dan still kind of posting enough and following the game. Yeah compared to this game he was more active in challenging people into answering questions then, and seemed to have more responsibility behind votes. In this game it's all yeah I don't know which of DNA and Serela is worse, which is downright irresponsible especially when they weren't similar players with similar circumstances. And going back onto Dorian follows the same trend.

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #155 on: August 03, 2015, 06:42:39 PM »
I ended up reading Town Mafia first which doesn't help because it's not an example of lurking Dan, it's an example of Dan still kind of posting enough and following the game. Yeah compared to this game he was more active in challenging people into answering questions then, and seemed to have more responsibility behind votes. In this game it's all yeah I don't know which of DNA and Serela is worse, which is downright irresponsible especially when they weren't similar players with similar circumstances. And going back onto Dorian follows the same trend.

Simple no will suffice

Don't lynch me.

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #156 on: August 03, 2015, 06:44:00 PM »
Even regardless of this I think it's a strong point against Dan that he hasn't proactively looked for scum since... when? I don't know since when actually. It's easy to say "yeah but that's because he thinks Conq is obvtown" but that's an easy pass, he should have at least shown signs of mulling it over, maybe rereading Conq and coming to the conclusion that he's town, maybe rethinking how DNA's role might actually strongly suggest that he's town, but none of that was really happening.

Another simple no will suffice

Don't lynch me.

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #157 on: August 03, 2015, 06:50:35 PM »
Explain what you liked about my ED1 play? I was completely off point that day since I hate D1s. I wouldn't say I really started figuring out the game until D2 so I'm surprised you townread me off those posts?

Eh, it's a bit less stellar than my memory, but I liked you nagging shalako twice mostly and being proactive in corralling people to move to zak, since you're sort of taking responsibility for the town lynch when you didn't have to and had no need to as scum when the wagons were TvT.

Don't lynch me.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #158 on: August 03, 2015, 09:05:31 PM »
No

Is this better  ???

I'll sleep and check on the thread in like 7 hours, in case deadline isn't extended or something.

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #159 on: August 04, 2015, 12:19:19 AM »
Actually I just realized I'll probably have a nice chunk of time tomorrow for the game that I don't usually have so yeah, I'm going to sleep and coming back then.

Hi

Don't lynch me.

NekoNekoRex

  • Catgirls are Charming!
  • *
  • Catgirl Enthusiast
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #160 on: August 04, 2015, 12:26:43 AM »
Deadline extended by 24 hours, by request.
Kilga is this right; like is this person seriously the player, and it's not some alias or something that's designed to be deliberately obfuscating? NekoNekoRex. Who the hell is that :C   ~Poya Aaaa (Serela), Bunny Must Die Mafia

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #161 on: August 04, 2015, 02:01:52 AM »
Hi
Yeah, here now, just finishing dinner.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #162 on: August 04, 2015, 04:00:21 AM »
This game was just as painful skimming through the second time as the first, but this time I was mostly looking at early interactions especially dna/shalako which I kept skipping over before since people keep bringing it up.

This post is going to be messy because I didn't know how I wanted to format it but decided to put it all down because this game is so big it's easy for me to forget things.

DNA/Shalako started all the way on page three with Shalako saying DNA set off a red flag but not voting him, and then it becomes a back and forth about meta reads and lack of communication of something? So yeah upon reading this it's definitely not too far-fetched to be a scum/scum interaction; I've seen worse D1 busses. The inclusion of reaction images and dank memes make me think they're just messing around and in posts like this:
But Shadoweh basically nailed it, I am not willing to directly put a vote on Murrin at the moment because I still want to remain open-minded instead of pressing for a claim and potentially ignoring other scummy players, namely, powerlurking players such as Zak who could be a even better lynch depending on Murrin's response. Panic tend to make people screw up, and seeing how hysterical Murrin already is without being put to L-2,  I hardly think it would be beneficial for his casemaking to further pressure Murrin.
It seems DNA is just trying to push alternative lynches while sitting on Shalako for reasons I can't really comprehend, and he soon jumped off onto Zakeri.

We also get gems on Shalako like this:
Even if I thought DNA was mafia it wouldn't stop me from questioning poor votes.
At this time i'm not willing to guess if DNA is town or Mafia but I don't think his line of attack on me is scummy even if it was poor for reasons i've stated.
Although then he did vote DNA soon after so I'm not sure what to think. I don't think the DNA wagon had any real chance of going through.

At any rate the wagons soon collapsed onto Zak. It would be ironic if I shut down a possible scum wagon onto a town mislynch, but oh well. Actually given that Dormio was the other major wagon that actually did happen, so. Mafia is too hard.

Shalako chimes in to say he likes Dormio blah blah.

Timing of Bard's Dormio wagon means it could have potentially gone through if the Zak wagon wasn't there as an alternative. I don't know. Feels kinda risky though and Bard did hard defend Shalako, weird that he would flashwagon another buddy instead. But governors etc but I think scum would want to save that until as late as possible?

Also, Bard posts clears DNA for "effort" and the Dormio vote could be a chainsaw.


Reading D2 again with Dan going hard after Bard and to some extent Shalako. DNA did a lot of defending of Bard and how this was definitely not scum!Bard, but goes after Shalako and Murrin instead. Shalako talks about his vote on DNA when he's not voting DNA.

Day stagnates with most people not voting until 24 hours left. I go after Serela. Whoops. :V

DNA claims giving me the drone. I questioned why he didn't just give it to a scum read but didn't push it. Another mistake in hindsight but I had no reason not to trust DNA back them.

DNA, My main reason to suspect him is pushing Policy Lynches, however I've never once seen a Lynch-Resistant Mafia, and he mentioned Beloved D1 in one of his walls, so I need to reconsider him.
Dormio Replaced by ActionDan I didn't understand why people attacked Dormio's post where he said paranoid reads beyond it being kinda fence sitting but I saw it as clarifying his thought process and Action Dan I agree with not trusting people just because they put effort into the game.
I mentioned this on D2 but Shalako taking this long to "reconsider" because of a claim that happened a previous day was pretty suspect. It does say more about Shalako than DNA, but I realized here that this way Shalako weaseled himself out of voting DNA at all despite DNA being his top scum read for most of D2 apparently.
A defense of Dormio here as well.

DNA starts the Shalako wagon with good points. It's a very strong attack but if scum were looking to bus then I guess this would be the time to do it? Feels like he could have done it earlier considering how much he scumread Shalako earlier. Maybe a late wagon would have less time to gather support with other people having townreads on Shalako? A votecount shows Shalako had one vote with 3 other 2 vote wagons.

About here the Shalako wagon picks up and Shalako starts spilling bullshit all over the thread and votes Bard.



At this point I started skimming hard and I cut everything out of this post because I doubt anyone is reading it and it pretty much became IIOA.

So I'll just summarize my conclusions.

Both Dan and DNA have pretty decent positions on the scum wagons. I don't think the slight differences in D2/D3 are telling, although DNA going back and forth between sky and other options fits a scum agenda better, marginally, since scum dont want to be left with one player with jailer and doc still alive.

I think the main thing that I keep coming back to is that Dan isn't a hard busser as scum and I find it hard to believe he would go after all his buddies like he did. His most recent game on MS had him parking on derptown all game. The only thing worrying is that Dan seems kinda passive in this LYLO but yeah, I'm leaning DNA as the last mafia right now. Sorry BT if this gives you short shrift but I think Dan's play here is within his town play and your entry is typical unreadable replacement for me, so I'm going off of that plus DNA's interactions being more likely to fit the scumteam than Dan's, plus stuff like Bard's wagon of Dormio D1.

As for roles, I'd guess JOAT drone giver with other abilities and maybe stuff like rolecop attached to the drones.

FWIW I don't think Dan!scum necessarily had to use a commuter N1.  It's a likely possibility but since we don't know what other roles would be in a JOAT there could be something better.


This took way too long but yeah. We do have an extension though so feel free to make me doubt myself all over again!


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #163 on: August 04, 2015, 04:02:10 AM »
*so I'm going off of Dan's meta plus


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #164 on: August 04, 2015, 04:07:37 AM »
*His most recent scumgame on MS
Although I don't know if it was actually his most recent, just a recent scumgame


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #165 on: August 04, 2015, 04:55:38 AM »
It legit didn't occur to me Shalako vs DNA could be seen as anything but real upon reading it. Confirmation bias strong. Basically you think DNA was just messing around, and I guess it could be interpreted that way, but that's more of a DNA behavioral thing. The indicator of it being a -real thing- is probably the amount of effort and emotion put in - the dank memes just obfuscate that.

I thought Shalako mistook what Beloved meant was an argument for town DNA but maybe that's bias as well. What's your take on DNA's claim at this point, that the beloved portion was faked? Because I'm not sure the way DNA handled it suggests that, plus it makes you wonder if he wouldn't have blogged it intensely in their QT as scum, and if there's a chance of scumbuddy Shalako not knowing what beloved means on D2.

Dan's ultrabussing starts strong but doesn't commence. I made the case that scum Dan would have left open the option of lynching others if Bard/Sky/Shalako improved. Don't you think town Dan would have pushed harder after the initial subbing-in case, like where he reacted to Shalako's claim confused and just left it that way.

Apparently unrelated to her stumpiness, she was gifted unlynchable status.
If this were a town ability they wouldn't be on the wagon.

So that leaves Bard.

So scum gave it to her.

Scum don't give that to townies.

Therefore she's scum.

Or we live in a world where both Shalako and bard are town.  And if so I don't want to be on this planet anymore.
Like, I don't know, is this conclusive enough? I guess it's your call if town Dan would have been more confused and thus done a more thorough job.

In essence, the litmus test I'd propose for the "Dan wouldn't bus!" point is how Dan continued to handle the Bard/Shalako cases. I'd like to think town Dan would have pushed harder and scum Dan, being shackled to the cases anyway since his buddies weren't improving, would have floated around like this instead.

I'd like to talk it over with you, Conq, yeah. DNA would probably cry.   :fail:

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #166 on: August 04, 2015, 05:01:55 AM »
I'd also like to make the point that DNA's posting style makes him the easiest target to blog about as scum trying to find lynch targets in the thread. Aaaand the important part here is "blog about", as in, you'd probably see lots of complaints about DNA in catchups, like what happened with Sky. I'm not sure a bus would have looked like that - instead it looks like the usual slowly chipping away thing that scum do to eventually justify lynching someone.

Meanwhile the strongly rhetoric'd vote on Dan based on a singular event reeks of Sky knowing that Dan is scum therefore.   :wat:

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #167 on: August 04, 2015, 05:08:15 AM »
By the way, the reason DNA gave you the drone is the stated reason, he thought you were town. Don't know why that's haunting you so much.

I remember reacting positively to Bard/Dormion when I was reading (it's documented in the thread!) but when I came back to it it was like "well". I geuss what happened is that Bard wanted a new vote to save face and didn't think he'd be endangering Dormio.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #168 on: August 04, 2015, 05:10:34 AM »
I think DNA was telling the truth about his claim but he left out parts. I think the beloved was real but conditional, and I'm not sure what the conditions would be. I will admit I don't know how this meshes with scum governor. Way to get me thinking about roles again.  :ohdear:

My point on Shalako suddenly realizing what Beloved meant is that I think he probably was told what it meant, either by DNA or overnight, and since the reasoning for beloved clearing DNA popped of nowhere. Like I said though this is more a point against Shalako than DNA.

Well, it's more the fact that he went through with the bus at all. I agree that he could have done a better job of pushing it but I'm pretty conflicted because from memory Dan has never been a real hard pusher. I think this is what you're meaning by the passivity. I know passivity is something Dan does as scum too, it's why I use accuracy as a benchmark instead because otherwise I can't tell. >_>

EBWOP: Why give me the drone instead of just making a scumread hated though? That's one less phase DNA is beloved and one phase where the drone is useless until I get to pass it on the next night.

Okay I just looked at Dan's N2 posts for the context and there's not as much as I thought, but then again it was just 24 hours. Well one weird thing is that Dan is usually more involved in role puzzles and didn't account for the possibility of Shalako lying? Hmm.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #169 on: August 04, 2015, 05:14:18 AM »
Oops, that EBWOP went in the wrong place.

And yeah DNA's posting style is why I'm having a hard time getting a read on the slot directly, since DNA is naturally a jumpy and probing player. Sky never did vote DNA or intend to vote DNA though.

Sky's Dan vote does read strongly, but I can't tell if it was a bus vote or a placeholder vote since Sky veered off onto Dorian for reasons.

I'll look over Bard's Dormio end of day stuff again


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #170 on: August 04, 2015, 05:23:47 AM »
Battlemap Update 5
Serela (2): SB, Bardiche
Murrin (3): Dorian, Shadoweh, Dormio
Darkninja (3): Zakerei, Murrin, Shalako
WHMZakerei (2): Raitaki, Darkninja
SB (2): Murrin, Conq
Conqureor (1): SB
Defensive Maneuvers: Serela

A ship can withstand the combined fire of 7 ships before it is destroyed.
Combat Cycle will end in 8.5 Hours

Reminder that No Majority = No Ships Destroyed

Okay, this was the votecount before Bard's Dormio vote. So it's not as risky as I thought. And Shalako stayed away from Dormio. I don't remember how risky a scum player Bard is though. I guess it's not as strong a point against Dan!scum as it was before? Ehhhhhhhhh I kinda want to hear from Dan since most of what he's said today has been responding to other players.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #171 on: August 04, 2015, 05:24:32 AM »
Um, I'm Pretty sure that those 2 quotes demonstrate I wasn't confused at all about what shalako was claiming, nor do they demonstrate any ambiguity about what I thought.  If it didn't mention the possibility of her lying, it's because that would obviously imply she was scum, which was my conclusion *rolls eyes*

Don't lynch me.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #172 on: August 04, 2015, 05:27:35 AM »
Well, okay, I figured that after I posted it. V:



On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #173 on: August 04, 2015, 05:29:17 AM »
Sarcasm comes across badly on the internet.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #174 on: August 04, 2015, 05:32:43 AM »
Dan do you have any questions to ask or are you just sorta waiting to make a decision?


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #175 on: August 04, 2015, 05:43:15 AM »
DNA probably didn't care that much about losing beloved, or was compelled to use therole for the sake of getting it out there. Potato potato.

Reminds me, you wanted to build scenarios for us. Just thought I'd remind you if you forgot.

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #176 on: August 04, 2015, 06:10:25 AM »
Dan do you have any questions to ask or are you just sorta waiting to make a decision?

I don't really have questions tbh.   I just see BT saying things like "Dan would have left the option open of lynching others if the scum posting improved" and shake my head.   Is asking for a reads list from shalako leaving options open?  I'd doubt a sane person would jump to that conclusion.  I don't think there's room to claim I'd ever do that for Bard or Sky, not particularly after I said "I don't think there's anyway that Bard is not scum here" during the middle of D2

Don't lynch me.

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #177 on: August 04, 2015, 06:11:01 AM »
er I guess ED2 at that point

Don't lynch me.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #178 on: August 04, 2015, 06:17:37 AM »
I don't really have questions tbh.   I just see BT saying things like "Dan would have left the option open of lynching others if the scum posting improved" and shake my head.   Is asking for a reads list from shalako leaving options open?  I'd doubt a sane person would jump to that conclusion. 
Dans 331 against Shalako looks great but no vote + possible handholding "I want a list of reads ASAP"

ActionDan

  • Teaching old dogs new tricks
Re: FTL: Faster Than Light Mafia Pt. 2 (Sector 6 , Combat Cycle)
« Reply #179 on: August 04, 2015, 06:19:26 AM »
It's probably because I was voting Bard?

I dunno

Obvious counterpoint seems obvious

Don't lynch me.