I feel like he's been pushing easy cases based on bad play (Oarfish, among others) rather than looking for things that are actually scummy.
I think it's scummy to have to make up bullshit reasons in order to vote people, and the reasons O4rfish invented to vote ActionDan were supreme bullshit. If we assume Town earnestly look for Scummy behaviour and Scum have to make up scummy behaviour or reframe behaviour into scummy behaviour to work, O4rfish fits perfectly where he first decides ActionDan is scummy and then tries to reframe everything ActionDan did as being supremely scummy even if it made no rational sense.
I think it's silly you're holding it against me that no one argued about their scumpicks after ActionDan's restriction triggered, especially in light of how we weren't going to be able to lynch anyone else instead. After talking about slow game and lack of suspicions, isn't it absurd to hold it against me that I don't have many either? You're basically saying "mea culpa", then claim it's scummy behaviour in others.
O4rfish's blatant "lol sheep" and votepark are a joke. I maintain that he's scummy.
##VOTE: ChaoreChaore is summarily terrible, starting from his first serious post where he blatantly admits to padding ("
I don't think like half of this is even worth mentioning but I feel off If I don't have atleast something in posts.") and going to all his follow up posts which are
empty and lack scumhunting. He
waffles a little, claims he was
suspicious of Dan all along (despite earlier mentions he doesn't think Dan's scummy suspicious) and finally claims he should
stop talking about Dan. If you read his posts in isolation, he should've done that a while ago.
So what we end up at is a player who has posted a bunch of times, never once anything to really point at someone as being scummy. A player who sat on his jokevote for all of Day 1 until Dan's restriction hit. A player who throughout Day 1 continues iterating only that he hates playing, doesn't want to play, everything's shit and everyone's terrible; his complaints mask that he's done basically nothing. A player who argued in favour of No Lynch based on paranoia mongering moreso than whether Dan is worth saving (summarily saying "nope" isn't reasoning) but never voted either way until hammer time.
I'd talk about others but I like my Chaore case and everything feels like drab. Unless Chaore comes with some kind of verifiable night result that shows he is not the killer we're looking for, of course.