Ok, I'll admit something very controversial.
I never really read up on old league lore before today.
It's not that I don't like lore or reading. I'm the kind of person that will read every word of a quest chain even if the reward is useless on my character. I just never got into League's lore though. Part of it was because of my on-off relationship with the game, but a lot of it stemmed from how seemingly random everything felt. Like seriously wasn't old Nasus an alien librarian that was just randomly summoned at the worst possible moment by summoners? And then he was easily convinced that fighting in the league was somehow more important than going back home and finishing the war with his people?
Now we have Sion, who simply was a random mindless killing machine while alive turned random mindless killing machine while dead. Now in two parts he is a famous Noxian warrior who died killing a king (rather than simply being caught and executed) tragically reborn as a mindless killing machine who can't tell ally from enemy. Much more interesting and that's only half of his lore apparently.
I honestly am liking the idea at least of connecting everything into one world instead of having it being so seemingly random. Sure sometimes the execution is flawed but it honestly has me caring more now than before. Assuming they flesh out some stories more (like Xerath's motivation for betraying Azir) then I'm happy.
Just my two cents though. :blush:
Because it's unique compared to what other champions are?
Sion in life was a brute of a man, used like a 'battering ram' because of his durability and love for slaughter, but he got captured and executed by Demacia in the end. Then Katarina recovered his corpse [Let's remove Katarina from the equation eh?]. And he rarely sees frontline fighting after his ress because he is so valuable.
I mean, the whole quote from Pantheon has also lost meaning: 'For Noxus, death is a promotion'. That was meaningful and powerful about the fate of Noxian soldiers. Now he's basically 2nd in command before he died.
Now Sion in life was Darius. He doesn't see frontine fighting because he kills friend and foe. The Black Rose had a hand in his ressurection, but that was never not stated before. And it dosen't show anything about Darius' fate because Noxus won't do this again with what Sion has become now, lowering their own troop's morale. Darkwill has had to kill entire squads for refusing to fight at his side...
So no, Sion was not just 'generic kill em all guy'.
Was seriously about to post when you did.
First off, how is "mindless battering ram" in life better than a strong warrior who single-handedly took on an army and killed a king? How is dying by getting captured due to stupidity and then executed better than dying killing said king with your final breath? Face it he was generic "kill them all guy" in life before. Sure you can argue new "alive" Sion was Darius in a past life but I'll personally take that over mindless battering ram any day.
Secondly what part of "part 2 of 4" do you not get? His lore is not done. Nasus' quote carries no meaning now sure but it may be scrapped altogether by the time we're done.
Thirdly, I wonder where you get "Darkwill has to kill entire squads"? Not being confrontational, I am genuinely curious? Is it old lore? I'm not seeing that anywhere in the new lore, so if you can point it out or link it I'd very much appreciate it.
Finally, and this is my biggest question concerning Sion lore, why was he alone? I mean if you had the power to raise an army of undead warriors who apparently get
stronger after reanimation why stop at one? Is it because of the league? Because if so that just shows how limiting having the IoW and summoners was.
Holy crap this post got out of control... :wikipedia: