I wanted to get involved in active discussion as a means of compromising between not wanting to read thousands of words at once and being a participant in this game, but of course I find I'm back to square one again since nobody responded between when I posted and when I checked before going to bed.
I was hoping for a reply form Raikaria about the thing I actually questioned him, rather than ignoring the question. I know he ignored it too, because he responded to the post my question was in by trying to pull up role shenanigans as a defense. I'm certain there are more ways in which your role is not-actually conformable that don't involve you having three different actions to perform in a single night.
I still have a bead that Raikaria might just be BSing reads, particularly his late day one read on sky, and I'd rather not drop it just because he's claimed a super-magical-vanilla role.
I have never known Weak roles to die upon being roleblocked. Yes it is possible that DNA is scum faking but why on earth would he as scum even include that he dies upon failing his result
This is true. Scum would be foolishly limiting themselves if they claimed a role that results in them getting NKed, I don't think in the grand scheme of fakeclaims that a Weak role would be one of the things you think of much less go through with.
I feel weird about the Town/Null reads I'm getting on myself, since I don't feel like I'm playing super stellar this game, as evidence by the fact that this is my second post of day 2. I would probably be much more interested in doing an actual super read of the game when Sky flips - as noble as it is to info dig today, I feel like a lot of the game depends on being able to cite his actual role rather than just trying to ignore his huge posts.
Speaking of huge posts, I feel like Sky might be intentionally inflating his posts because he knows it'll just make everyone want to gloss over it. It actually makes for a good obfusation tactic since it makes people have the gut reaction of calling him town to avoid having to discuss the posts.
NNR is too cute for this world.
I feel like I haven't commented on DNA at all, but I don't think there's much that needs commenting other than I don't think he'd make the best vote target. Everyone feels so far behind Sky and Raikaria in those terms. It's probably not going to be nearly as easy as this sounds, though.
Just read through the recent slapfight between DNA and NNR and I'd have to take DNA's side. If NNR is town (And I'm not saying he can't be) Then it shouldn't be that much of a problem to actually calm down and look at the points he's making and why they are bad points. Most of NNR's responses are sweeping generalizations, and do nothing to point out why any of DNA's posts or cases against him are bad from NNR's perspective. If they really are as bad as he says they are, it should be easy to dismantle the cases piece by piece instead of offering a token response to one thin piece and claiming all of the other points are just as bad.
