Paranoia response:Dan wants no-lynch because it seems innocent enough during mylo and in actuality scum has some cool PR they want to use again. (The logic part of my brain says "what kind of role would they even REALLY want to use at this point?")
It's annoying that all I have to go on for Dan's alignment is "Well, he advocated lynching Raitaki over CF7... when he was admitting to not knowing what was going on at the time." which is depressingly realistic from town!dan, and the Raitaki over CF7 could be very well explained by not being properly up-to-date on stuff.
Dan why do you have to have meta of "does almost nothing and doesn't adequately read the game"? If you're town again this game I'm going to start wondering why people even let you /in anymore, because this is Really Uncool. I know you said you've been having a tough time lately, but seriously, you do this -almost all the time-. ;_;
Anyway, I need to reread PX. Would lynch Zakeri based off of his actions yesterday about the 1v1. It's hard to imagine someone seriously having those reactions to CF7's arguments, and the only thing making me consider otherwise is that it seems like even scum would have given up and bussed CF7 near the end there rather than proclaimed the case on him was mostly role shenanigans... which weren't really a factor at ALL apart from the 1v1 stuff, I think he said that before people even started really bringing up the element stuff. Town!Zakeri is the person who defended NNR and voted Schezo when Schezo claimed a cop guilty on him and NNR responded with "BUT I ROLEBLOCKED YOU LAST NIGHT SO YOU COULDN'T HAVE, SCUM!", so this would have some kind of precedence, but... yeah, d3 is really incriminating for Zak.