Affinity is scummy according to basic vote count analysis - he started out D2 voting ShadyK, but switched to Nameless when the Serela wagon accumulated a significant votes and a Nameless lynch had more support than a ShadyK lynch. This looks like a pretty blatant attempt to save the roleblocker. Additionally, a quick search of his D1 posts shows instances of "but why not Serela?"
here and
here, but there are no examples of Affinity actually following up with on the dirt he had on Serela further into the game. The IRL pass Serela received from Affinity on D2 seems contrived when you consider that Affinity gave Serela no grace for being scummy back when Serela was not an actual wagon target.
Nameless' reluctance to put Serela at L-1 in his
#492 could be interpreted as a desire not to bus the team's roleblocker as well. His actual reasons for pressing Serela were terrible for being improperly-used meta, and were not even consistent - just a few posts ago, Nameless had claimed that Serela was one of his greatest town reads. Last minute distancing? I'd like Nameless to explain what his thought processes regarding Serela were throughout D2.
ShadyK's roleclaim checks out with his softclaim on D2 (which I believe), and I have trouble believing Serela would push him to L-1 when Serela was already going to get lynched in LYLO regardless of town cred. ICE is town because of Shadoweh's death and his interactions with Serela on D3, which don't look orchestrated to me.
Affinity looks the worst to me right now and I'd prefer to lynch him today. PoE points to Nameless as his buddy, and there was some weirdness going on with Nameless and Serela too. I don't think Nameless being scum would devalue the main points on scum!Affinity (pushing Nameless's wagon as a counter to Serela), either, given that Affinity and Serela have histories of abusing bussing and Nameless is presumably a not an active role if scum with anybody other than ShadyK. A D2 Nameless bus seems pretty reasonable.
