Lastly, for someone who dislikes lurker prodding, you have certainly done so here, possibly to masquerade content on others, by your reasoning.
The only thing remotely resembling a lurker prod there is... my comment that Rawr is useless. Which more expresses my idea that he is, in fact, useless than anything, as far as I care. Do you find me asking Serela for clarification on an earlier promise prodding lurkers? Similarly, do you find me asking Dan and yourself to explain just what "1+1+1" scumhunting is to be prodding lurkers? If so, then I plead guilty to that, although I reject the notion that I am merely prodding without asking aimed questions to which I want answers. Answers which, I note, have still not been given.
As it stands you have a running accusation against me that my scumhunting is "1+1+1", while still not explaining the terminology so that I actually understand what you're holding against me. Do you consider it a lurker prod that I attend you to this again?
In any case, I'm willing to let the BT thing slip, if only because his explanation for the entire Serela case makes me understand (though not agree) why he might've thought it an original point to hold against Serela. I took that sentence as meaning that NOT voting PX would be a repeat of another game's D1, rather than that anything else. If you understood that the way you did, then I suppose I cannot hold it against you that strongly.
I'm going to look past BT, then. Except Huh What just flipped Town, so I cannot quite look at him either. I'm left with completely reviewing who I think is scum. I decided to look at ActionDan. Well, rather, I decided to look at more people, and I still hold that Affinity's reasoning is weaker than it normally is. Again, I would like him to explain what his case on me is, and why he feels that I was prodding lurkers by asking for specific answers.
The matter is further made worse by
posts like these where you ask why people
aren't voting you, which as Town seems a fairly silly thing to do: why in the hell would you want to liken your own actions to that of someone being seen as scum, and why would you ask people why they aren't voting you (unless they express serious concern you're scummy and do nothing with it)?
who mentions himself in a Mafia game outside of a roleclaim except as defence?
Quoting for irony.
There's also the problem where
you downright state you'd lynch Hero not for being scummy but just opaque and bad, which you later change to
minor justification in "reactive scumhunting". Why did you first state you'd lynch him for being "a liability" and then later come with a more legitimate reason to agree to his lynch?
Anyway, Dan. Dan does this thing in his first post where
he rolefishes immediately for Shadoweh, And unless we outguess the mod,
this seems a thing, first line, since why would the mod tell some Townies that "all Town can true-claim" but not every Townie? That just seems weird. At the same time it seems tantamount to suicide for scum to outright claim so, so I'm willing to chalk it up to Bastard Mod, while at the same time I find it worthy enough to mention and think about. My gut tells me it's scum and logic dictates that it's possibly just Chaore is a Bastard Mod. (And given we have a Vanilla who True-Claimed as Vanilla, it seems Role Madness also includes "lolfakevanilla", so...)
The convenient "confirmed Town" list of HW, Serela and Shadoweh seems premature given D1 doesn't generally lend itself well to
confirming people as Town. Only scum know who's definitely Town, after all. In particular I dislike his reasons for clearing Shadoweh, since
Shadoweh is town for picking up town reads on Serela + Huhwhat and in general getting town to focus in the right directions.
Where the first part reads as "Shadoweh is Town for having the same views as me", which reads as buddying up.
Then today he specifically
"restated" his true claim (despite never making any claims to it aside from being able to suicide)... hold on. There's a problem here.
On D1, Dan said that
If I were about to be lynched, I'd use the special ability to in effect give town a double lynch. Anybody able to do so should do the same.
, however, today he claims,
(after a lynch occurs during twilight, that's why there was a pause before Hero flipped. I chose not to save him.)
... so there's no "about to be lynched", there's only "WHEN I am lynched".
And then he has no scum picks for the day, despite joining the "lynch Bard" sentiments the other day, which seemed a pretty clear indicator that you had a pretty good idea of scum after Hero.
##Unvote
##Vote: ActionDanSecond to ActionDan I consider Affinity, if it isn't clear. But at the moment ActionDan's discrepancy in claims, his interest in rolefishing and his case on Hero is basically "Hero couldn't possibly have made a mistake", which is a bogus reason to lynch someone, take precedence over Affinity.
