I agree with Affinity's point about Zak. I also find him very suspicious because, at least one of Chaore, Affinity, and Dormio would have had to have been scum. If he had town reads on Affinity and Chaore, a FoS on Dormio, and noticed that the wagon on Chaore hadn't reached lynch over the course of 12 hours, I don't understand why he would risk a second wagon as town and leave Dormio out of his consideration, who was already the only player on the wagon he didn't have a town read on.
Zak's interactions with Dan and Dormio are odd and minimal. I find his
147 suspicious, in that he defends Dan's Polaris case without giving a read on Dan. I'd like him to explain why he liked, or at least understood, Dan's Polaris case
here.
During his day 2 post he avoids the Dan case, focusing on tangental cases as Affinity has pointed out. He starts his day 3 with a promise of Hero, YJ, and Dormio rereads that he doesn't get to until day 4. He says Affinity's attack on my day 2 is unfair while attacking me on my day 2. I also find the shift in his reads on Chaore suspicious. He asks what other players think about Chaore's roleclaim in 608, in
610 he starts to point out things he doesn't like about Chaore, then after LLD and Affinity voice their lack of interest in lynching Chaore, he switches to a town read in
623.
##FoS: ZakI'm curious why you didn't use your power on day 1 when Bard called you out on it, and there was nearly a no lynch followed by dueling investigative role claims. I also notice that you didn't claim your role name when you claimed Homura, and was curious why you omitted that.
