On ActionDan
I was accused during the game of breaking my own rules by killing ActionDan for not posting. Let me make clear that I did not kill ActionDan because he did not post. After he claimed the Night Talk power and to have a Post Restriction, I sent him a message requesting clarification on his behaviour, as I could not rhyme it with pro-win behaviour. Put simply, going against your wincon and confusing Town is trolling the game, and trolling is toxic behaviour.
Because ActionDan never replied to my message, and because I saw Town considering lynching ActionDan, I made the judgement call that I would not have Town mislynch because one player decided to be a dick and play counter to their win condition by lying about their post restriction and lying about their role power. That's unacceptable behaviour and I refuse to let that be the reason for a loss.
TL;DR, I modkilled ActionDan for breaking Rule #1 after giving him the benefit of the doubt. I understand I allowed "lie, cheat and deceive your peers", but that did not include playing counter to your win condition. I made the call that it's counter to enjoyment if you lose not because scum played well, but because one Townie played aggravatingly counter to their win condition.
In the end, I suppose Town did lose anyway, but that's a balance factor I'll look at closer. With Scum having NIGH ZERO power that directly supported them (Serela could become Beloved at the cost of giving Town Night Talk), I felt that three mislynches to win might be too much for them to pull off. I was severely wrong and for that, I sincerely apologise to Town for putting them in a hard situation.
Town powers were limited, but designed to help Town by giving them clarity about the game (Shalako could ask question and receive 100% accurate answers, so long as he didn't try to be a lie detector, cop or role checker) or by letting them completely bypass a Day event they felt were against Town.
For example, if DNA had chosen to NL or mislynch someone other than the guy with the highest votes, Day 3 would instead only allow unmovable votes in the first 24 hours and then another set of unmovable votes in the last 24 hours. While I think that's pro-Town (it forces people to make an immediate call, and the threat of vote at the end of the day as "pressurevote"), if Patorikku disagreed he had the power to void the entire Day event.