Hello!
I'm fairly new to the fandom, and this site as well, so I apologize if this has already been discussed with great depth in the past. However, from both Google searches and scavenging the forum for a bit, I could not find a thread that addressed this topic with enough substance for my taste.
As a new fan, I've been greatly impressed by the works of the numerous and exceptionally talented artists and creators found in the Touhou Project fandom. Still, I must say that navigating this franchise has been something of a learning experience for me?Touhou is both my first encounter and the closest I've ever come to anything like the Japanese doujin culture, and I must admit that it's sometimes difficult to explore a world where the difference between acceptable and not isn't as simple as what's ordinarily found in the mainstream.
I think we can all agree that with regards to purchasing an artist's works, it's most often best to do right by the original creators as much as we can. Generally, this means purchasing works legally without resorting to piracy, and it also means acquiring goods in a way that pays respect to the author's intentions and will. In the limited time I've spent observing this forum, I've found that such thoughts have come to define the philosophy of Maidens of the Kaleidoscope, and rightfully so in my eyes.
Because official works such as the main series games, their accompanying soundtracks, and print works either authored or authorized by ZUN appear to remain in print indefinitely due to their place in the canon, upholding such views with regards to these items poses no significant hardship for most buyers. Similarly, thanks to the efforts of N-Forza and the service he provides, there is also no issue with upholding these views with regards to newer fan works that can be bought either at live events or from select online vendors with full blessings from the original creators.
The first and only time that these thoughts are legitimately challenged in my mind are with regards to the purchasing of non-official fan works that have already reached the end of their product cycles and are otherwise considered out-of-print. At this point, it appears that the only way to acquire these things (apart from the Internet which would bring us straight back to our collective stance on piracy) is through purchasing from a re-seller.
However, the subject of purchasing from the second-hand market is something that I've come to find deeply troubling with regards to honoring the code I've outlined above, and especially so where it concerns the doujin scene. I don't think it should come as a surprise that many doujin creators think about as much of the unauthorized re-selling of their works as they do of illegally scanning and uploading those same works to the Internet?which is to say that they find it distressing at best and highly disrespectful at worst.
What really struck me about this in my research is the depths to which some follow these views in the community. I've seen it said on more than one occasion that some doujin artists would rather see their books burned or irreparably destroyed than to have them re-sold. And when I really think about it, all too frequently do I find myself sympathizing with their views: to say nothing of the value in maintaining an environment that plays to the nature of the doujin culture (keeping the artist in control, both for the sake of their rights as a creator and to prevent their works from drawing too much attention from the original work they're parodying), it is downright offensive to see a second-hand store charging such a heavy mark-up for not only a product that they do not own, but one that the original author likely made without expecting or even wanting to receive a monetary profit.
But then the second-hand market is the only way to find these things, lest they otherwise be lost to time. So, I'm curious to hear the opinions of this forum for the sake of my education on the subject: do you personally find that there are any ethical means of acquiring end-of-life doujin products? And if not, is there at the very least a 'most' ethical means that you might find morally permissible enough to use yourself?
If you're interested in my opinion, I've come to consider the answer to the first question a flat "No." I'm still thinking about the second question, but despite the fact that it will obviously affect how I move forward, I'm being fully honest when I say that I'm strongly considering whether or not the answer should be "No" there as well.