Because my role didn't let me.
That's a valid enough excuse. On basis of my role alone you're not scum then (there can be other reasons!), but let me catch up with the rest of the game.
##UnvoteHome and settled and I've read the rest of the day. Gonna comment briefly on people saying I'm scummiest because I have votes but no real reasons on why. Anyone who criticises my voteswap to Dormio: It was 6% battery power, we had two prominent wagons and I disliked the wagon on Raitaki. Lynch >>>> No Lynch. Deal with it.
@Zakeri:
Of the people who voted for Dormio yesterday, I think Raitaki, Bardiche, and Action Dan are the worst right now.
Clarification needed, what makes these people worst and why is Raitaki worst at the time of post? Why even place a placeholder vote "until you've finished reads"? It looks like you had a conclusion ready before you did the research, and that's just liable to get you netted some pygmalion effect right there. If you read under the assumption someone is Scum I'm sure you can call everyone scum. Can you clarify?
Not a big fan of Rakaria, Bardiche, and Nameless using their vote to do a combined interpretive consolidation dance in the later half of the day. I think one of the three is scum.
6%, battery, consolidation of lynch is bad how, when alternative is a lynch I disliked or no lynch? (The latter which is surely worst for everyone, except Scum) If one of the three in the bucket list is Scum, and Raikaria is excused and Nameless is Town, why is Raitaki worse than I am?
@Nameless:
Bard is someone I'm a bit suspicious of but there's bigger fish to fry today.
I do agree that Bard is the scummiest of the 3, as evidenced by still suspecting him.
It's not a completely solid stance but it's the most solid anti-town stance I have at the moment.
right now I think you're most likely to be behind the C.C. vote. I also think the person behind it is very likely scum. This is reflected in where my vote is.
Scummiest on what basis, and why can't you seem to agree with yourself on who is scummiest/most anti-Town? I'm assuming "anti-Town" = "Scum" or of equal threat level, if you mean "acting against Town but not necessarily not-Town" you need to vote the scummiest person instead and tell other people why this is so.
I can get not immediately producing reasons for various reasons, and none of those reasons seem entirely apparent to me. There's no real trap laid out here and no real updating of cases. There's not even a clear reason why I'm scummy other than "see Day1". We have a wagon flip so incorporate that into your reads.
##Vote: DrRawrFor all the same reasons yesterday which have all held today. Also because his attitude annoys me: Calling someone "stupid" for voting you and generally being condescending is not an attitude I like to see in my game environment, on top of zero scumhunting so far yet. Protip: Just voting someone isn't scumhunting, you also gotta convince Town you've got Scum by the throat, and lashing out at everyone who suspects/votes you isn't a way to convince people you're voting Scum.
Other people in my ire zone are Serela: Vote without reason provided, then 14 hours later post to say you'll post later (basically), and since you said you just woke up in the first post... I dunno, are you asleep right now? :X You didn't seriously vote someone, promised content and then left it hanging there for a Day, did you? That's an incredibly nice position to be in.
Nameless raises my ire for this line:
I would have liked another flip to work with since Dormio's is basically useless as we all thought him a good lynch and he posted hardly anything.
, since when I voted Dormio we were 5/5 with Raitaki and my votes elsewhere, and no one swapped from Raitaki onto Dormio. Therefore, if you're going to say Raitaki is Scum, you're saying Dormio was a counter-wagon to Scum, which means his wagon should be of great importance.
Please consider your response to this carefully: Why do you consider Dormio's flip basically useless when according to your vote it was a counter-wagon to your top scum suspect, so people who swung the wagon and people who built the wagon should be suspicious as a result?
