I just woke up to all this. This might be harder than it looks. Whatever, looks like we've left random voting behind. ##Unvote
Now, why didn't I comment on this miller claim? Simple: I know what a claim is, the claim post also explained what a miller is(he votes for himself if he is one vote from getting lynched) and, most importantly, I didn't believe it to be serious. Everyone was prancing around saying silly stuff and I'm not sure if it's serious true, serious lie or randomness. Thus, I ignored it (what was there to say?) and did a silly vote like everyone else was doing. I am not sure how to react to this claim or the other and I shall judge how true they are from the players' general behaviour.
I was unavailable (homework + asleep) from about twelve hours ago. I'm pretty sure that clears it.
That's pretty much all concerning me. Now to examine logic holes.
Let's say that I can't see Bardiche's logic in post #31. As far as I know, we were still voting semi-randomly at Raikaria's post, so a feeble grasp from game-theory sounds like trying to pull the game out of RVS(which is the random voting stage, right?). Indeed, it seems to me as if he has succeeded, since Bardiche pretty much jumped the gun and voted him on the ground of not taking initiative... which means not voting, I think. That creates a logical fallacy in my eyes.
I don't think it's a lot of leverage, but it's the best I can see. ##Vote Bardiche
FYI, within an hour I will take my leave to school again and be unavailable for another eight to ten hours.
[PX] Votes need to be bold and in a separate line to count. Unvotes are not required to change votes
