Oh wait, I haven't placed my vote yet? Herp derp.
@Dormio: Cheerleading Bard? The only part at all of Bard's vote against Raikaria was the vote itself, but none of the reasons. The day suddenly being at a little over half battery when I pop up alarmed me a little, so I was expressing my concern about the possibility of a general consensus for lynching not reached before battery died. Apparently I underestimated the battery though. And now that more people pop up and start pointing fingers, there are more options for lynching, so I'm no longer interested in a Raikaria lynch (for now).
Shadoweh's play seems to be deteriorating by the minute. Her #132 was chock full of AtE (granted, she does normally throw some AtE around, but usually not as heavy, and with good reasons), and everything afterwards was just weakly nudging people to vote Hero. Also, I think she just claimed a Vengeful role or something.
##Vote Shadoweh.
@Hero, what are your opinions on people you've yet to address? IHNN too, as I don't see you commenting anything about him except for his roleclaim.
To be fair though, DrRawr's activity has always been pretty much around the current level as far as I can remember, so I can't really suspect him seriously just yet :|
@Zakeri: Fair enough. However, my point that you lack opinions on players still stands. You HAVE been questioning Hero, yes, but unless you're also treating his "This game is too clustered" bit as scummy, the only reason you're voting him that I can see is that you think he tried to cast attention upon Serela. In your latest post, all you mentioned of Hero was saying he overreacted to the density of posts, pointing out he's wrong to think Dan and IHNN were cooperating, and saying his inquiries to Conqueror were null. All the while your reads are still all but non-existent.
