Maidens of the Kaleidoscope

~Hakurei Shrine~ => Touhou Addict Recovery Center => Topic started by: game2011 on September 18, 2012, 04:33:25 PM

Title: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: game2011 on September 18, 2012, 04:33:25 PM
As you know, ZUN's drawings tend to be a subject of ridicule, even among devoted fans.  I think most people are exaggerating his drawings too much.  It's really only Touhou 6 that has drawings of questionable quality.  The games after that aren't as bad as most people think they are, at least for some characters.  I even find the drawings for 1 to 5 pretty good, more so than 6.

What do you think?
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: M M on September 18, 2012, 04:44:44 PM
I think most people says that for laughs.

Or because they expected/prefers generic mo? drawings, and ZUN art is clearly the opposite of that.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 18, 2012, 05:03:41 PM
I would suggest that his artwork actually started becoming adequate, in my opinion, around Imperishable Night. (I took a look at PCB again the other day, and actually, I would argue that his artwork wasn't very good then, either, along with ESoD.)

Or because they expected/prefers generic mo? drawings, and ZUN art is clearly the opposite of that.

I think it's actually kind of obvious that ZUN is attempting to make his characters look cute and "moe," but they come out as poorly-drawn blobs (although, to a degree, he is getting better), which is off-putting to less-tolerant folk. I would say, "Suck it up!" to such people who might complain about his artwork, though, since at least his drawings are so bad that they can be used for a good laugh rather than haunt your subconscious (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gWyqAjQ7Ug) with scream-yourself-wide-awake nightmares for eternity~ :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Alfred F. Jones on September 18, 2012, 05:20:57 PM
I think it's actually kind of obvious that ZUN is attempting to make his characters look cute and "moe," but they come out as poorly-drawn blobs

(http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/9205/pcbtrialsakuyaditz.jpg)

What are you talking about? PCB Demo Sakuya is adorable.

I will never get tired of this screencap
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 18, 2012, 05:24:43 PM
(http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/9205/pcbtrialsakuyaditz.jpg)

What are you talking about? PCB Demo Sakuya is adorable.

I will never get tired of this screencap

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6MlaIe1ljs
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 05:27:23 PM
Let's be honest, the portraits in EoSD?

Those gave nightmares. Yukkuri-Sakuya still haunts me.

Then, from IN and further, it became better and better, up to UFO where they were really good, and now TD, where I'm surprisingly impressed by how great they look. And yeah, it's played for laughs, nobody actually thinks ZUN sucks for real. That guys programs the game, creates the pattern, thinks of everything in the game, writes the dialogue, makes the music...

He does ALL THAT and it completely ROCKS. Then the art comes into play and it's mediocre. (Or in TD's case, good). So in comparison, it's the most obvious flaw in Touhou; His art doesn't sucks, it's just mediocre while everything else is heavenly.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: M M on September 18, 2012, 05:58:24 PM
I think it's actually kind of obvious that ZUN is attempting to make his characters look cute and "moe," but they come out as poorly-drawn blobs (although, to a degree, he is getting better), which is off-putting to less-tolerant folk. I would say, "Suck it up!" to such people who might complain about his artwork, though, since at least his drawings are so bad that they can be used for a good laugh rather than haunt your subconscious (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gWyqAjQ7Ug) with scream-yourself-wide-awake nightmares for eternity~ :V

I think I used the wrong term. Maybe "generic anime style" would be a better description. Like how alphes draws them:

(http://i.imgur.com/F8v5R.png)

which makes the characters seem tall, skinny and somewhat mature, while ZUN's art makes them childish, round and fluffy, like a beefed up version of puni plush.

Particullary, I really like his old art. The characters are simple and clean, and their expressions are fun, like Suwako's grin, Satori's uninterested, one-eyed look, and Mokou's stare/mocking. His art got a lot "better" in UFO and TD, but I fear that he's losing his unique charm.

Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Goldom on September 18, 2012, 06:24:40 PM
Someone on /r/touhou asked the other day about whether we liked ZUN's art. (http://www.reddit.com/r/touhou/comments/zxpm1/do_you_like_zuns_art_why_or_why_not/) I'll copy my reply here-

Short answer: I like it,1but that doesn't mean I think it's always good
Caveat: I fully admit if I can't draw to save my life.

So why do I like it? Because it's got such a unique style. I mean, it seems like every anime-style artist in Japan can (and normally does) draw in the same way without much trouble... except for ZUN. So that makes his all the more fascinating. It's also interesting how much it changes - if I didn't know, I would never guess that each game's portraits were drawn by the same person.

Probably my single favorite portrait he's done is Sakuya in EoSD. Specifically, this one. (http://i.imgur.com/Qonwn.jpg) I have never seen such a perfectly smug face. Doesn't change the fact that she also looks like a doofus, but it's just got such style to it. Satori (http://en.touhouwiki.net/wiki/File:Th11Satori.png) also, for looking wonderfully disheveled.

As for improving, definitely. I particularly liked IN portraits for their "porcelain doll" look. And the art in UFO, while not flawless, shows that he's basically got down "normal anime style" at this point. Pretty interesting, then, that he then moved away from it in TD and other newer drawings (http://en.touhouwiki.net/wiki/File:ZCDS-0013.png).

(1)Except for MoF. MoF art (except Sanae, Aya and maybe Nitori) is just painful (http://i.imgur.com/YHe88.png).
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 06:33:36 PM
Yeah, SA was full of awesome. Mokou was my favorite in IN portrait wise. (But they were all good in general).

I'll never understand why people like Sakuya's portaits in EoSD. The expressions are good, no denying it, but her face... It was like a fat Yukkuri with creepy huge cheeks.

Fun fact: I used to love Hina's portraits and stuff. I later realized it was because I seem to have missed the infamous ''Hina Face''. Now she scares me xD
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Zil on September 18, 2012, 06:41:04 PM
Aside from the hands being completely bizarre, I don't think his older stuff is much worse than the newer. They have a "sketchy" look to them, but I like that, and their expressions are usually pretty cute. (EoSD and PCB Marisa are by far the best ones imo.) Conversely, he still makes very strange looking characters in the newer games. In Ten Desires in particular, while some characters like Seiga and Miko look pretty good, Futo and Yoshika look awkward to me, and TD Reimu is the ugliest Reimu of them all.

I guess my main problem with his drawing is the lack of consistency. Some characters turn out well, while others just don't, and it doesn't seem to have much to do with how recent they are. His style has changed, yes, but the overall quality is the same to me, if not worse.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 06:45:26 PM
In EoSD, some faces were weird, if not creepy. Sakuya has this weird potato face, and Remilia looked like a 20 something years old. (Which lacks consistency)

I agree about Marisa though, in the new ones, she makes creepy faces xD MoF Marisa was probably the worst, with that creepy ''wink-rape'' face and ''Lol swag'' shrug. (That's how I call them, I'm sorry)

And I doubt Yoshika wasn't MEANT to look dumb. She's canonically retarded, so her driving a magical imaginary taxi is hilariously fitting.

Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 18, 2012, 06:49:32 PM
I guess my main problem with his drawing is the lack of consistency. Some characters turn out well, while others just don't, and it doesn't seem to have much to do with how recent they are. His style has changed, yes, but the overall quality is the same to me, if not worse.

For example, Toyosatomimi having two right hands (even though ZUN should know better by now, considering how much he had technically improved by UFO)~

(http://i.imgur.com/HfNuX.png)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 06:56:05 PM
Her outfit is more than just a frilly dress, her haircut is epic (DOG EARS FTW :V) and she's well proportionned. Something not many portraits have :/

Still, everyone is entitled to their own opinions, so I'm not trying to convince anyone ''TD is the best damn thing ever when it comes to portraits'' (Even though the life system enrages me to no freaking end)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 18, 2012, 07:03:03 PM
Her outfit is more than just a frilly dress, her haircut is epic (DOG EARS FTW :V) and she's well proportionned. Something not many portraits have :/

Yes, I completely agree, but two right hands? Why would ZUN make such a basic mistake now when he's come so far? And this isn't just some 1st-level shmuck, either; it's the climactic battle against the final boss~! *facepalms*

Anyway, I love Ten Desires, and I'm not trying to argue the point; I'm just saying that it's so backward that it doesn't make any lick of sense why he would feel so comfortable overlooking it~ :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 07:09:52 PM
Oh yeah, I agree that it's a pretty ridiculous mistake xD I love TD too (EXCEPT THE LIFE SYSTEM ARGH) and I honestly never noticed she had two right hands before someone pointed it out. In fact, I thought ''Oh nice she's holding something, ZUN is pretty good at making hands holding stuff'' (something I can't do)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: EthanSilver on September 18, 2012, 07:17:08 PM
I think the main gripe comes from how most doujin groups have more than one member, and at least one good artist as well. ZUN's a one-man-team - it'd be kinda ludicrous to expect top-tier gameplay, top-tier graphics, and top-tier music all from the same person.

(http://i.imgur.com/cwp40.png)
lol, lolibugeyes; but that's not the point...

To be fair, ZUN has improved since EoSD and before. I think a lot of the criticism his artwork is getting is something that stuck from the earlier days. Even so, ZUN doesn't compare to a doujin artist who specializes in being an artist. Personally I'd love to see more artwork like in GFW; that looked on par with what you'd expect from a game like this. But ZUN's stuff works too; his sprites are damned good IMO and that's really the bulk of the game.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 08:51:48 PM
I think the main gripe comes from how most doujin groups have more than one member, and at least one good artist as well. ZUN's a one-man-team - it'd be kinda ludicrous to expect top-tier gameplay, top-tier graphics, and top-tier music all from the same person.

Yeah, his music is heavenly, the gameplay is great, the sprites are fantastic, the dialogues are witty, the characters are nice, the danmaku patterns are bedazzling... Seriously, if anyone expects more from a single man, he's freaking insane :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Vento on September 18, 2012, 09:43:05 PM

BUT I LOVE HIS ART UNIRONICALLY

it is pretty unique o <o) his style has this character that fits with the carefree nature of the games imo


why do people call andrew hussie a god when he has a team and everything
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Error on September 18, 2012, 10:23:05 PM
ZUN art es best art huehuehue
Oh um wrong thread

For someone that's supposedly in a state of perpetual drunkenness, they're pretty good.
Although the music is (obviously) better.

Makes me wonder how his work would differ if he was sober...not that the world is ready for such a thing.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 10:32:31 PM
Makes me wonder how his work would differ if he was sober...not that the world is ready for such a thing.

Reimu: Oh hi Marisa.

Marisa: Hey Reimu.

Reimu: ...

Marisa: ...

Reimu: Why isn't there some sort of weird incident happening?

Marisa: Dunno.

Reimu: ...

Marisa: ...

Reimu: Hey wanna have some really kinky sex involving tentacles?

Marisa, suddenly dressed as a schoolgirl: I'M DEFENSELESS, SO I'LL WALK IN THIS RANDOM DARK ALLEY :D

So basically it would become like every other japanese thing ever :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Raikaria on September 18, 2012, 10:44:11 PM
If Touhou didn't have ZUNart then Touhou wouldn't have half the fan following, and may have died down by now.

A lot of the fan following comes from people wanting to make better art of the characters, and put their own spin on it. I doubt that the artistic community would have picked up on Touhou anywhere near as much if ZUN's art was... you know... good.

Not that he's not improved, but the bad art has done the... benefit... to the community.

A MASSIVE part of Touhou fandom is fan addittions, and fan-art if no exception. And people are not scared away from drawing fanart for Touhou because ZUN's early art is SO BAD.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 18, 2012, 10:44:28 PM
Reimu: ...

Marisa: ...

Reimu: Hey wanna have some really kinky sex involving tentacles?

Marisa, suddenly dressed as a schoolgirl: I'M DEFENSELESS, SO I'LL WALK IN THIS RANDOM DARK ALLEY :D

So basically it would become like every other japanese thing ever :V

I lol'd heartily this day. Very, very heartily.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 10:51:11 PM
I lol'd heartily this day. Very, very heartily.

Yay! :* I was afraid someone would have been really offended xD
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 18, 2012, 10:52:44 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/cwp40.png)
lol, lolibugeyes; but that's not the point...

Oh hey, another eXceed fan! My evening is made.

I honestly think this question is unanswerable. It's a matter of taste. I understand why people roll their eyes at ZUN's pipe legs and six-fingered-hands, but I also understand those who love his drawings for their special charm, and because they're his.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Nindella on September 18, 2012, 11:00:40 PM
Reimu: Oh hi Marisa.

Marisa: Hey Reimu.

Reimu: ...

Marisa: ...

Reimu: Why isn't there some sort of weird incident happening?

Marisa: Dunno.

Reimu: ...

Marisa: ...

Reimu: Hey wanna have some really kinky sex involving tentacles?

Marisa, suddenly dressed as a schoolgirl: I'M DEFENSELESS, SO I'LL WALK IN THIS RANDOM DARK ALLEY :D

So basically it would become like every other japanese thing ever :V

This must not be allowed to happen!!
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 11:02:38 PM
This must not be allowed to happen!!

I agree, seeing Marisa as anything less than a badass witch with a smug attitude is blasphemy!
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Hakurou Tengu on September 18, 2012, 11:18:26 PM
He's a musical genius who creates STGs with a pretty decent plot, for an STG, by himself. Even if his art isn't that great, he makes up for it with pretty much everything else. To be honest, aside from the characters faces/expressions, I think they're "ok", but I'm no art critic. I can hardly draw a dog, never mind a human... youkai... creature... YAMABIKO. Fan art is also generally amazing, when it's done "the right way"... Danbooru.jpg *shudder*

Besides, ZUN's art has certainly improved over the years. Like everyone is saying, EoSD art is... EoSD art. Even PCB wasn't exactly great. Who needs drawing skills when you can create Great Voice "Charged Yahoo!"? (I love the gimmick of Kyouko's spellcards...). It's like Tengukami said though, his art has a certain charm to it. You just can't really hate it.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 18, 2012, 11:26:40 PM
Who needs drawing skills when you can create Great Voice "Charged Yahoo!"? (I love the gimmick of Kyouko's spellcards...).

Yeah, ZUN is incredible, that's no surprise, but when you stop for a moment and think about it, he thought up and made all those spellcards and gimmicks that we see in the games. It's just incredible, at least to me. And the best part is that every game has a new gimmick.

EoSD: Time Stop (Though everything was remade, that's a unique thing no other game has)
PCB: Youmu's bullet time
MoF: Err...
SA: Satori's first spellcard that is affected by your movements, pretty much everything with Koishi in it.
UFO: Brofists, anchors, curvy lasers in great quantity.
TD: Kyouko's reflection, Yoshika's eating habit, Seiga's double-teaming, Miko's last spellcard.

I wouldn't have thought of half the things he did. ZUN is amazing. I seriously can't wait for Touhou 14 and see what other fancy things he did. (Plus awesome music :D)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 18, 2012, 11:50:15 PM
I think that's a good point, if the subject here is ZUN's art. Do backgrounds and stage design concepts not also count as "art"? If so, ZUN has done some incredible things with the medium.

This video is my favorite example: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZbJRMT0e2g&t=1m47s) Imperishable Night, 6A, Boss fight with Eirin. This stage is, from an artistic point of view, a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Leaving aside gameplay, it is aesthetically pleasing on any difficulty - the suddenly shifting backgrounds, which include the iconic moon landing photo, are jarring and also play to the game's theme of the moon. At the same time, the bullet patterns themselves represent elements of Eirin as a character - namely, chemistry in particular and science in general. Her spellcard concepts refer to and reflect things like genetics ("Genealogy of the Sky-Born"), the British mathematician John Horton Conway ("Game of Life"), and the Apollo 13 mission ("Apollo 13"), not just in their names and descriptions but in the patterns themselves.

This is an artistic choice on ZUN's part. It does not affect gameplay to design your bullet patterns after personality traits of the boss; it's something ZUN chose to do for purely aesthetic reasons, to better convey the concepts behind his character and the game itself - and that is a decision an artist makes.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Raikaria on September 19, 2012, 12:05:52 AM
Yeah, ZUN is incredible, that's no surprise, but when you stop for a moment and think about it, he thought up and made all those spellcards and gimmicks that we see in the games. It's just incredible, at least to me. And the best part is that every game has a new gimmick.

EoSD: Time Stop (Though everything was remade, that's a unique thing no other game has)
PCB: Youmu's bullet time
MoF: Err...
SA: Satori's first spellcard that is affected by your movements, pretty much everything with Koishi in it.
UFO: Brofists, anchors, curvy lasers in great quantity.
TD: Kyouko's reflection, Yoshika's eating habit, Seiga's double-teaming, Miko's last spellcard.

I wouldn't have thought of half the things he did. ZUN is amazing. I seriously can't wait for Touhou 14 and see what other fancy things he did. (Plus awesome music :D)

What about IN?
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 12:14:25 AM
What about IN?

*facepalms with the strenght of a thousand Okuu suns*

God I'm dumb. IN had a lot of things, namely Mystia's nighblindless (Frustrating, but awesome!), Reimu's weird border bullet transport, Reisen's bullets playing hide-and-seek and the last words in general.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: AnonymousPondScum on September 19, 2012, 12:48:52 AM
Let's see...

-Main characters acting like morons and taking their sweet time to get anything done, even on a speedy run
-Equally bumbling or innocuous antagonists
-Frequently confusing plot that was confirmably made while ZUN was drunk
-A two-woman mini-Death Star fueled by bickering
-The world's longest-running and least-motivated immortal blood feud grudge match.

Imperishable Night is the Touhouest of Touhou games. :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Cadmas on September 19, 2012, 12:48:57 AM
For example, Toyosatomimi having two right hands (even though ZUN should know better by now, considering how much he had technically improved by UFO)~

(http://i.imgur.com/HfNuX.png)

Don't forget about Minoriko's two left feet. Wheres my crack pairing thouhouo community?

Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 12:54:59 AM
Let's see...

-Main characters acting like morons and taking their sweet time to get anything done, even on a speedy run
-Equally bumbling or innocuous antagonists
-Frequently confusing plot that was confirmably made while ZUN was drunk
-A two-woman mini-Death Star fueled by bickering
-The world's longest-running and least-motivated immortal blood feud grudge match.

Imperishable Night is the Touhouest of Touhou games. :V

Border team: Yukari acting weird
Magic team: They actually went foward.
Scarlet team: Remilia picking fights with everyone, Sakuya trying to stop her
Netherworld team: Yuyuko's special... condition.

I wouldn't say ''take their time'', it's more like they have an annoying team member.

But anyway, you forgot the NUMBER 1 MOST IMPORTANT THING EVER in IN.

Alice and Marisa's snarky dialogue. Oh sweet, sweet dialogue >u<

Quote from: Marisa
Bitch, get out the way!
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Goldom on September 19, 2012, 01:07:23 AM
[nm mispost]
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: AnonymousPondScum on September 19, 2012, 01:07:36 AM
Border team: Yukari acting weird
Magic team: They actually went foward.
Scarlet team: Remilia picking fights with everyone, Sakuya trying to stop her
Netherworld team: Yuyuko's special... condition.

I wouldn't say ''take their time'', it's more like they have an annoying team member.

But anyway, you forgot the NUMBER 1 MOST IMPORTANT THING EVER in IN.

Alice and Marisa's snarky dialogue. Oh sweet, sweet dialogue >u<

O rite.

And no I didn't! That was included in the bickering-fueled-Death-Star comment.

THE MALICE CANNON HAS NO BRAKES.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 19, 2012, 01:12:40 AM
Magic team: They actually went foward.

But anyway, you forgot the NUMBER 1 MOST IMPORTANT THING EVER in IN.

Alice and Marisa's snarky dialogue. Oh sweet, sweet dialogue >u<

Honestly, I believe that there should be more Marisa/Alice team-ups in future core Touhou games--and not for some silly pairing reason or other such nonsense. I just can never get enough of those two; their chemistry is nearly unrivaled within the Touhou universe. Not to mention, they make for the perfect heroic duo: the witty boke powerhouse and the elegant tsukkomi brain, both being highly unorthodox personally, but justifiably good-willed~
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 01:28:15 AM
Honestly, I believe that there should be more Marisa/Alice team-ups in future core Touhou games--and not for some silly pairing reason or other such nonsense. I just can never get enough of those two; their chemistry is nearly unrivaled within the Touhou universe. Not to mention, they make for the perfect heroic duo: the witty boke powerhouse and the elegant tsukkomi brain, both being highly unorthodox personally, but justifiably good-willed~

You know what would be even awesomer?Patchouli, Alice, Marisa, all together in a team. Snarky x3.

*drools thinking about it*
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 19, 2012, 01:36:00 AM
I think that's a good point, if the subject here is ZUN's art. Do backgrounds and stage design concepts not also count as "art"? If so, ZUN has done some incredible things with the medium.

This video is my favorite example: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZbJRMT0e2g&t=1m47s) Imperishable Night, 6A, Boss fight with Eirin. This stage is, from an artistic point of view, a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Leaving aside gameplay, it is aesthetically pleasing on any difficulty - the suddenly shifting backgrounds, which include the iconic moon landing photo, are jarring and also play to the game's theme of the moon. At the same time, the bullet patterns themselves represent elements of Eirin as a character - namely, chemistry in particular and science in general. Her spellcard concepts refer to and reflect things like genetics ("Genealogy of the Sky-Born"), the British mathematician John Horton Conway ("Game of Life"), and the Apollo 13 mission ("Apollo 13"), not just in their names and descriptions but in the patterns themselves.

This is an artistic choice on ZUN's part. It does not affect gameplay to design your bullet patterns after personality traits of the boss; it's something ZUN chose to do for purely aesthetic reasons, to better convey the concepts behind his character and the game itself - and that is a decision an artist makes.

I'm going to go ahead and quote myself here, to get us back onto the thread's actual subject. Not every thread on this board needs to derail, I don't think.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Hinacle on September 19, 2012, 01:42:06 AM
Why has no one mentioned Yuyuko's fan?
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 01:46:04 AM
I'm going to go ahead and quote myself here, to get us back onto the thread's actual subject. Not every thread on this board needs to derail, I don't think.

Sorry.  :ohdear:

Why has no one mentioned Yuyuko's fan?

This. This is something no one has really noticed; Not only Yuyuko's fan, but every special things that bosses have sometimes. Parsee's jealousy bubble, Hina's misfortune aura, Yuyuko's bedazzling fan, Byakuren's lotus glyph, Miko's...flower. (If anyone could tell me what it actually is, I'd really appreciate) Those things makes boss battles so much more awesome; I mean, portraits appear for what? 20 seconds, maybe 30? Those things in battle gives you a ''Oh crap what is- Oh my god that is awesome'' feeling. That's a point even I overlooked at first in ZUN's art.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 19, 2012, 01:50:03 AM
I think that's a good point, if the subject here is ZUN's art. Do backgrounds and stage design concepts not also count as "art"? If so, ZUN has done some incredible things with the medium.

This is an artistic choice on ZUN's part. It does not affect gameplay to design your bullet patterns after personality traits of the boss; it's something ZUN chose to do for purely aesthetic reasons, to better convey the concepts behind his character and the game itself - and that is a decision an artist makes.

Oh, absolutely~! From just about any of the Windows games, the backgrounds and designs are stunningly gorgeous; I don't think I can find it in me to say a single negative statement about them (in fact, half of the time while I'm playing, I'm wondering what methods and tools he used to create them)~
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 01:55:19 AM
Oh, absolutely~! From just about any of the Windows games, the backgrounds and designs are stunningly gorgeous; I don't think I can find it in me to say a single negative statement about them (in fact, half of the time while I'm playing, I'm wondering what methods and tools he used to create them)~

Oh yes, the backgrounds! They're absolutely gorgeous, I wonder the exact same thing!  :3 It's really nice to see awesome 3d and moving backgrounds when you play a STG. Eientei was my favorite, with the eternal dark corridor and the rainbow/purple/cosmos path. Amazing. Plus, it becomes even more obvious when you check what was the background behind the bosses:

Remilia: Scarlet red moon in a dark night
Yuyuko: Cherry blossoms tree
Kaguya: Full moon shining with purple waves of moonlight
Shikeiki: Beautiful flower field
Kanako: Suwa lake
Utsuho: Nuclear reactor's core
Byakuren: Makai's twilight
Miko: Admittedly a bit less impressive, but still a nice night sky full of divine spirits.

I dare you to find games that top those listed here.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Clarste on September 19, 2012, 03:52:29 AM
To be fair, ZUN has improved since EoSD and before. I think a lot of the criticism his artwork is getting is something that stuck from the earlier days. Even so, ZUN doesn't compare to a doujin artist who specializes in being an artist. Personally I'd love to see more artwork like in GFW; that looked on par with what you'd expect from a game like this. But ZUN's stuff works too; his sprites are damned good IMO and that's really the bulk of the game.

Nothing against the artist in Fairy Wars, but I actually found it pretty unsettling to play a Touhou shooting game without ZUN art. That's one of the reasons I'm not very comfortable playing that game. There's something about the portraits that just works in context, for me anyway. I guess I'm one of the people who finds his art charming. It's pretty interesting how his style changes so drastically though. IN looks nothing like anything else he's done, for example. It's not a matter of improvement, he just keeps changing.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: game2011 on September 19, 2012, 04:21:41 AM
Someone mentioned this before: The art style for GFW makes the characters look a tad bit... chubby...

Also, what are people's opinions on the drawings from 1 to 5?  As I said in the first post, I think they're pretty good, even if we don't get to see the full portraits for most of the characters.  I think they look somewhat like manga/anime art style from the 80s.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 19, 2012, 06:56:54 AM
Someone mentioned this before: The art style for GFW makes the characters look a tad bit... chubby...

Agreed. I've never been a big fan of the art style in Fairy Wars; I would have actually much rather preferred ZUN's to be honest~

Also, what are people's opinions on the drawings from 1 to 5?  As I said in the first post, I think they're pretty good, even if we don't get to see the full portraits for most of the characters.  I think they look somewhat like manga/anime art style from the 80s.

The outfits may have been inspired by the 80s, but that hair definitely screams of 90s anime clich?; flashy, neon, and lots of it~
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Esper on September 19, 2012, 10:40:52 AM
What about IN?

IN has a few spells that are pretty much Familiar Walls, which you can use for extra score.

If that doesn't count, at least I tried.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Chuckolator on September 19, 2012, 10:49:35 AM
ZUN art is awesome and people who say otherwise are haters.

except EoSD Sakuya
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: M M on September 19, 2012, 11:05:16 AM
I like Makoto's art because it made the fairies look like children, unlike PMiSS art, for example.
Also, his GFW portraits moves a lot, and makes the dialogues much more fun to read. Since Phantasmagoria of Flower View ZUN's haven' been moving at all... he just adds some emoticons and bruises.

Btw, EoSD Sakuya:
http://i.imgur.com/TFZ6s.jpg

These are the two of the funniest expressions in the series. I don't understand how someone can hate it :(
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 11:21:10 AM
I personally loved the GFW portraits, but that's just me. (They actually look like kids! Plus, as mentionned below, they ''move'' too)

Btw, EoSD Sakuya:
http://i.imgur.com/TFZ6s.jpg

These are the two of the funniest expressions in the series. I don't understand how someone can hate it :(

Those two are ok, it's when she smiles... Her cheeks suddenly gain 15 pounds each and gives her a potato face :(
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: pineyappled on September 19, 2012, 02:05:00 PM
BUT I LOVE HIS ART UNIRONICALLY

it is pretty unique o <o) his style has this character that fits with the carefree nature of the gam
why do people call andrew hussie a god when he has a team and everything[/sizees imo


Touhou just isn't the same without aderpable ZUNart. The fighting game and GFW art just rub me the wrong way.
and the fighting game art isn't good get a pair of eyes people ;_;
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: AnonymousPondScum on September 19, 2012, 03:23:22 PM
These are the two of the funniest expressions in the series. I don't understand how someone can hate it :(

THERE IS NO GODDESS BUT HINAFACE, AND ZUN IS HER PROPHET.

(http://i.imgur.com/ekD2h.png)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Unassuming Squid on September 19, 2012, 03:30:15 PM
and the fighting game art isn't good get a pair of eyes people ;_;

...why isn't it good?

Honestly, I like ZUN's art for the fact that it, as has been previously stated, adds a level of particular charm to the games, almost like a signature. It's not technically good art, but it's pretty well done.

If some other game had art like that I probably would not be charmed by it. But it's one man doing everything, and in that context it's fine.

Of course this is only talking about the character portraits. The backgrounds and sprites in the games themselves are fantastic. Say what you will, but the final stage of SA gets to me every time by the point it gets to the pan-up for the black sun.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Zil on September 19, 2012, 03:57:43 PM
I can't say I like the fighting game art, myself. Just looks bad to me. The characters aren't childish enough, they're shaped weird, stuff like that. Utsuho and Cirno in particular just look way off. I love the GFW stuff though. Cute as hell.

I have mixed opinions about how the spellcards look. MoF and SA were great in that department, UFO was kind of hit and miss, and TD was really lacking imo, especially in the second half of the game. Utsuho and Byakuren had this thing going with really flashy and creative stuff, and Miko just didn't do it. Oddly, the nonspells in TD look much cooler than what you'd expect.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: MaStErSpArK94 on September 19, 2012, 04:25:02 PM
Miko's...flower. (If anyone could tell me what it actually is, I'd really appreciate)

According to the wiki (http://en.touhouwiki.net/wiki/Toyosatomimi_no_Miko), it's a butterfly and a reference to "Zhuangzi's butterfly dream", a Taoist philosophy story.

And yes, it does look pretty cool. :)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: game2011 on September 19, 2012, 04:58:04 PM
All this reminds me of Yoshitaka Amano, the person who did the artwork for most of the Final Fantasy games.  His art style is either love or hate among fans.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 06:50:29 PM
According to the wiki (http://en.touhouwiki.net/wiki/Toyosatomimi_no_Miko), it's a butterfly and a reference to "Zhuangzi's butterfly dream", a Taoist philosophy story.

And yes, it does look pretty cool. :)

...Well I'll be damned. Thanks!

As for the fighting game art... I looove it ;__; But that's just me.

I have mixed opinions about how the spellcards look. MoF and SA were great in that department, UFO was kind of hit and miss, and TD was really lacking imo, especially in the second half of the game. Utsuho and Byakuren had this thing going with really flashy and creative stuff, and Miko just didn't do it. Oddly, the nonspells in TD look much cooler than what you'd expect.

Yeah, UFO was lacking for a few characters, but Byakuren made me weep in joy and horror. (Oh wow that is so gorgeous- uuu I died  :()
Miko's spellcard were... Eh. Rising Sun thing was ok, but a bit too simple, and the rainbow random pew-pew thing was gorgeous, for the first 5 seconds before you get bored of it.The rest was just random spread of colours.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Goldom on September 19, 2012, 07:14:08 PM
If we go by Marisa's statement in SSiB that "the most beautiful spellcards win,", Byakuren would be my #1 choice. Devil's Recitation is the most beautiful card in the series in my opinion, and her others are pretty stunning too. Miko's actually my second favorite though, Colors of 12 Levels in particular. IN Marisa is third, because I love rainbows.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: teefa85 on September 19, 2012, 07:56:09 PM
I agree with the fact that ZUN's art, while not the best out there, has its own charm.  Plus I love how he designs his characters, which is one of the more important aspects to me; seeing as I'm someone who has a great design in her head, but cannot get it onto paper due to her bad drawing skills.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 19, 2012, 11:32:46 PM
IN Marisa is third, because I love rainbows.

My first experience in IN when going in Stage 4:

''Oh hey it's nice, the stage is fast-paced!''

''Oh nice, Marisa's the boss!''

''Holy crap what a gorgeous non-spell, it's so colorful! and the stars are easy to dodge!''

''Wait- What is that star doin- WAIT NO STOP NO STOP MOVING AROUND LIKE THAT NO-''

''GODDAMNIT DON'T WAVE AROUND RANDOMLY STOP THAT, STOP THAT''

''*no lives left* Ok, Ok, I can do this- WHAT THE HELL!!!'' - When facing THAT non-spell where she creates a bullshit wall of stars. Impossible to dodge  :V''

Conclusion: Marisa is right. The more beautiful it is, the harder it'll rape you.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Kaze_Senshi on September 20, 2012, 02:06:38 AM
I think that people say these things for the lulz, I laugh when I see someone saying things like the Satori's small arms or that he draws poorly to let the fans make some good fan-arts. In my opinion he don't draw badly, it's his style of drawing, something more simple and I love the little details that he made in the character design like the snake at the Sanae's hair or the key at Nitori's chest. Also when you beat the bosses they appear with some part of the  clothes torn or with that big tear at the eyes it's pretty comic.

Two things that this thread made me remember is that surprise expression that Marisa does at IN, she looks like a rabbit, I always smile when I see this pic, and for me Remilia's hands is strange, it looks that it is broken and trying to imitate the pose is painful :P

(http://imageshack.us/a/img51/2904/marisarabbit.jpg)
(http://imageshack.us/a/img546/6052/remilia.jpg)

PS:  ROFL at Miko's rights hands
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: AnonymousPondScum on September 20, 2012, 02:10:40 AM
Remilia's displaying, like, the opposite of jazz hands there. :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 20, 2012, 02:12:37 AM
That's pretty much her signature pose. It makes me chuckle every time I see it and I just CAN'T resist mimicking it.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: pineyappled on September 20, 2012, 02:50:16 AM
In my opinion he don't draw badly, it's his style of drawing, something more simple and I love the little details that he made in the character design like the snake at the Sanae's hair or the key at Nitori's chest. Also when you beat the bosses they appear with some part of the  clothes torn or with that big tear at the eyes it's pretty comic.
No, he's a bad artist. His anatomy, hands, and faces are generally fucked up beyond comprehension, and everyone is Chubbycheeks Sausagelimbs. These kinds of things aren't style; they're outright bad art. Character design has little to do with actual art skill.
That said, his drawings are adorable as fuck. Youmu's TD cut-in is just the cutest thing.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 20, 2012, 02:56:47 AM
More or less related, anyone else niticed hiw random his character designs are? Marisa's random wand just pops in like an unwanted child, and reappears and disappears randomly. The hell, ZUN?!
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: AnonymousPondScum on September 20, 2012, 02:58:41 AM
It also looks a bit like the Cane of Somaria from Zelda. :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Mootsies on September 20, 2012, 04:12:11 AM
More or less related, anyone else niticed hiw random his character designs are? Marisa's random wand just pops in like an unwanted child, and reappears and disappears randomly. The hell, ZUN?!
Just like reimu's exorcising stick (gohei) got a hell of random length every single game people will think she stole it from goku  :V
Oh, and ZUN's tendency to change hair and eye colours too.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Darth_Sirov on September 20, 2012, 04:44:02 AM
Reading about this greatly reminds me of an excerpt from Cracked.com:

as stated:

He produces a series of games called 'Touhou Project'. He does all the coding, art, music, and design work by himself. You may be wondering how one man can single handily pull all of this off without a hitch. The answer to that is simple: The official character art sucks.

and the picture to add to the joke was the MoF Reimu (the infamous Zombie/Jaundice pic)

Though as mentioned, he's improving quite nicely, better than most people.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: danyun on September 20, 2012, 04:59:34 AM
I actually like Zun's art and always have, ever since I first played Touhou. I didn't really care how it compared to other game art, I genuinely thought it was cool. Especially Sakuya.
Am I weird?  :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: haoreos2 on September 20, 2012, 05:26:29 AM
I like ZUNart, with a few exceptions (mostly the recent stuff, actually). I think it's got charm and fits the game's atmosphere, especially in IN. It's good art in that it is aesthetically pleasing, but it's not particularly skilled.
The expressions are wonderful, though. Also, that hinaface is adorable.

I also think IaMP/SWR artwork is lovely (Yukari's weird hair in her defeat portrait aside). Half of the appreciation comes from how it actually makes the characters look the ages I imagine them to be, for the most part- young Reimu and Marisa, Sakuya being youngish but more mature looking due to her countenance, mature Yuyuko and Yukari, etc. The other half is that it just looks really great, fits the atmosphere of the game, and lends weight to the dialogue for the most part.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Kaze_Senshi on September 20, 2012, 08:37:00 AM
No, he's a bad artist. His anatomy, hands, and faces are generally fucked up beyond comprehension, and everyone is Chubbycheeks Sausagelimbs. These kinds of things aren't style; they're outright bad art. Character design has little to do with actual art skill.
That said, his drawings are adorable as fuck. Youmu's TD cut-in is just the cutest thing.

There are a lot of projects that the characters are pretty deformed like "The simpsons". The deformed faces can be his style, for me there are some problems that could be resolved if someone could "review" the art for him to let it more consistent, like Miko's hand (lol)

Also someone noticed when Flandre appears on the extra Stage and starts to talk, her standing frame animation's right leg stays trembling? :P

I also think IaMP/SWR artwork is lovely (Yukari's weird hair in her defeat portrait aside).

Did ZUN draw something at the fighting series? I thought that other guys helped him at these games.



Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: haoreos2 on September 20, 2012, 10:28:09 AM
Did ZUN draw something at the fighting series? I thought that other guys helped him at these games.

As far as I know, all the character portraits for the fighting games were done by other people. That quote was meant to be seperate from the ZUNart bit, responding to this sentiment:
Touhou just isn't the same without aderpable ZUNart. The fighting game and GFW art just rub me the wrong way.
and the fighting game art isn't good get a pair of eyes people ;_;
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: nicholashin on September 20, 2012, 11:02:00 AM
I thought it was almost-universal fact that ZUN is not a very good artist.
I finds his portraits strange, but at least I enjoy his background and danmaku art.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Swiftwater on September 20, 2012, 11:29:43 AM
As far as I know, all the character portraits for the fighting games were done by other people. That quote was meant to be seperate from the ZUNart bit, responding to this sentiment:

People? Maybe alphes.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: game2011 on September 20, 2012, 04:48:02 PM
I thought it was almost-universal fact that ZUN is not a very good artist.
I finds his portraits strange, but at least I enjoy his background and danmaku art.
Things like these have no facts, only opinions.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 20, 2012, 07:23:15 PM
Things like these have no facts, only opinions.

As mentioned many times, it's universally accepted that his art is bad in comparison to the rest of what he does.

Saying you like his art is one thing, (a good number of people does) but nobody will go as far as saying ''ZUN's draws much better than he composes music!''
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 20, 2012, 07:40:15 PM
Saying you like his art is one thing, (a good number of people does) but nobody will go as far as saying ''ZUN's draws much better than he composes music!''

Unless someone who happens to hate Touhou for whatever reason is out to get a reaction out of fans...
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 20, 2012, 07:47:29 PM
Unless someone who happens to hate Touhou for whatever reason is out to get a reaction out of fans...

Trolling level: Strong.

Even better: ZUN's art is the only good thing in Touhou. (Liiiie)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Alfred F. Jones on September 20, 2012, 08:07:00 PM
ZUN's art is okay, but the fighting games' art is fantastic. There's a very good reason that the fanbase was waiting anxiously to see the new portraits in the lead-up to SWR full release.

Though, I would also love to see Iku (http://en.touhouwiki.net/images/8/82/MAGNet_20100502_3_Iku.jpg), Tenshi (http://en.touhouwiki.net/images/1/16/MAGNet_20100502_4_Tenshi.jpg), and Suika (http://en.touhouwiki.net/images/0/06/Suika_rough.jpg) in danmaku games with the art he's made for them. His eye for design has only improved over the years.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 20, 2012, 08:17:19 PM
Though, I would also love to see Iku (http://en.touhouwiki.net/images/8/82/MAGNet_20100502_3_Iku.jpg), Tenshi (http://en.touhouwiki.net/images/1/16/MAGNet_20100502_4_Tenshi.jpg), and Suika (http://en.touhouwiki.net/images/0/06/Suika_rough.jpg) in danmaku games with the art he's made for them. His eye for design has only improved over the years.

W-wow... they're really good... Who knew?
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: AnonymousPondScum on September 20, 2012, 08:19:57 PM
Yeah, it's funny, his pencil/traditional media doodles seem to be really solid while his actual in-game artwork looks derpy. I dun get it either. :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 20, 2012, 08:27:23 PM
W-wow... they're really good... Who knew?

Er... I don't know about you, but they look just about exactly the same as his usual work to me. Solid, considering his common style, but not anything where I'm suddenly going to say, "Wow~! It's so different~!"

(Although, personally, I do think his Iku certainly looks the best of the three.)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 20, 2012, 08:34:53 PM
Er... I don't know about you, but they look just about exactly the same as his usual work to me. Solid, considering his common style, but not anything where I'm suddenly going to say, "Wow~! It's so different~!"

(Although, personally, I do think his Iku certainly looks the best of the three.)

Well, Suika looks the same, but I dunno... I feel like Iku and Tenshi look better. Especially the hands, they look like real human hands.

And I just noticed how Tenshi's hat is ridiculous in the sketch :V
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: TheRadicalX on September 20, 2012, 09:29:28 PM
ZUN is a bad illustrative artist. This is... pretty much objective fact. He has no grasp of anatomy or value, and it especially shows with his flesh tones - he can sometimes achieve a decent skin colour, but the shading makes it look washed out and anaemic. His clothing if you look at it for any length of time lacks any real sense of three dimensions - it's like a paper cutout he pasted over the character's body. A lot of his mistakes could really quite easily be fixed just by doing frequent life studies - but then, this is true for every artist ever, no matter what your skill level. You can and will improve if you do studies. Natural talent is a minor factor and a distraction, art is about the work.

On the other hand, his bad art does have a charm to it, partly for humor and partly because it's become intrinsically tied to the aesthetic of the series. Furthermore, expecting the dude to put in the long hours it takes to do all the studies he'd need to do when he already has to balance all of the other skills he needs to make his games is unreasonable, especially when his art occupies that special spot of "so bad it's good," or maybe more accurately "pleasantly familiar."

But I'm still not going to claim his style isn't a symbol-set crutch or that he isn't a bad illustrator, because he's a really, really bad illustrator.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 20, 2012, 09:37:08 PM
^^Quite accurately everything that I believe about ZUN's artwork to a tee. Way to go, man~ *brofist*
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: TheRadicalX on September 20, 2012, 10:00:51 PM
I guess I should add that while I think the dude's a bad illustrator, I also think he's a fairly-to-very skilled character designer, depending on the character in question. Shou, Miko, Byakuren, Yukari's IN outfit, etc. are all really, really cool designs, even despite his artistic handicaps.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Goldom on September 20, 2012, 10:12:35 PM
He has no grasp of anatomy or value,

What do you mean by "value" there?
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 20, 2012, 10:39:04 PM
I guess I should add that while I think the dude's a bad illustrator, I also think he's a fairly-to-very skilled character designer, depending on the character in question.

I completely agree; granted, I do find a few of his designs to be a bit clunky every so often, but then again, nobody's perfect, right? For example, although I'm well-aware that there are quite a few people on this forum who really, really love Utsuho, I would suggest that, while her overall design has plenty of worthwhile inspiration to it, I'm not the biggest fan of her schoolgirl motif or the unexplainable control rod attached to her arm that virtually came from out of thin air in canon, especially considering that her best friend, Rin, has a much more appropriate color scheme and style of dress for the area in which they live, in my honest opinion~

What do you mean by "value" there?

I believe that he's referring to color luminosity, such as with the gradual changes from light to dark and vice versa~
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Kaze_Senshi on September 20, 2012, 10:40:16 PM
he can sometimes achieve a decent skin colour, but the shading makes it look washed out and anaemic.

So the character that he can draw better is Patchoulli :P
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 20, 2012, 10:42:23 PM


I think this is a fair point. Illustrations can cover all kinds of styles, though, not just realism with regards to proportion, values and skin tones. I'm sure the style is due in part, as you say, to not have the time to put into character art, but I think it's never been his intention to draw realistically. You can definitely see some major screw-ups in intent in the early Windows games, but I think these have for the most part smoothed out over time to a preferred style, aesthetically speaking, not just in regards to his time frame. The charm, for me, is less about the comedic value and more about ZUN's chosen style of illustration. The familiarity you bring up is also naturally a part of this.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: TheRadicalX on September 21, 2012, 12:42:30 AM
I completely agree; granted, I do find a few of his designs to be a bit clunky every so often, but then again, nobody's perfect, right? For example, although I'm well-aware that there are quite a few people on this forum who really, really love Utsuho, I would suggest that, while her overall design has plenty of worthwhile inspiration to it, I'm not the biggest fan of her schoolgirl motif or the unexplainable control rod attached to her arm that virtually came from out of thin air in canon, especially considering that her best friend, Rin, has a much more appropriate color scheme and style of dress for the area in which they live, in my honest opinion~

I believe that he's referring to color luminosity, such as with the gradual changes from light to dark and vice versa~

I agree with that. Utsuho's design is cool to us because we're used to it, but really, it's not one of ZUN's best works. It's kind of a mish-mash, to be honest. Rin's design is another one of his best though.

And that's pretty much it, yeah. Having a grasp of value is understanding how luminosity and light works - value studies are often in black and white for this reason so as to eliminate color as a distraction.

I think this is a fair point. Illustrations can cover all kinds of styles, though, not just realism with regards to proportion, values and skin tones. I'm sure the style is due in part, as you say, to not have the time to put into character art, but I think it's never been his intention to draw realistically. You can definitely see some major screw-ups in intent in the early Windows games, but I think these have for the most part smoothed out over time to a preferred style, aesthetically speaking, not just in regards to his time frame. The charm, for me, is less about the comedic value and more about ZUN's chosen style of illustration. The familiarity you bring up is also naturally a part of this.

The problem with saying it's just his style, though, is that it... isn't. I may not be the best artist, but I do frequent several art communities so I can at the very least say this - exaggeration or abstraction without a grounding in fundamental basics is different from deliberately choosing what to abstract, stylize or exaggerate because you understand how everything works at the basic levels. ZUN's arms, legs, to some degree torsos, and blatantly his faces aren't just that way because of his style - they're that way, and obviously so, because ZUN fundamentally does not understand how to realistically portray anatomical features. That's why instead of proper calves, all of his characters have anaemic sausages attached to their knees. It's why he can't draw a chin to save his life and there's no sense of how his characters' skulls actually sit inside their heads.

I'm not saying that the only right way to do art is to do it realistically, I'm just saying that until you have that fundamental knowledge of form, value and color (of which ZUN only has the  latter, and only to a certain degree), you won't be able to stylize in a deliberate, informed way, and mistakes, poor choices and lack of study will be apparent.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Clarste on September 21, 2012, 12:46:18 AM
I completely agree; granted, I do find a few of his designs to be a bit clunky every so often, but then again, nobody's perfect, right? For example, although I'm well-aware that there are quite a few people on this forum who really, really love Utsuho, I would suggest that, while her overall design has plenty of worthwhile inspiration to it, I'm not the biggest fan of her schoolgirl motif or the unexplainable control rod attached to her arm that virtually came from out of thin air in canon, especially considering that her best friend, Rin, has a much more appropriate color scheme and style of dress for the area in which they live, in my honest opinion~

I also kind of dislike Utsuho's design. While individually the parts seem like they should be cool (the red eye on the chest, the giant wings, the starfield cape, etc), in practice they kind of get in each others' way rather than complementing each other. Throw in the rather uninspired generic clothing and giant ribbon for no reason and she just looks kind of weird.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: pineyappled on September 21, 2012, 12:58:10 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/cfevL.jpg)
This is what TD Seiga looks like under her clothes.


e-
(http://i.imgur.com/TbmZH.jpg)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 21, 2012, 01:10:45 AM
e-
(http://i.imgur.com/TbmZH.jpg)

That pose always freaked me out. She's an extra boss, a never seen character and we get that pose. A winking weird pose.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: M M on September 21, 2012, 02:14:46 AM
Quote
I also kind of dislike Utsuho's design. While individually the parts seem like they should be cool (the red eye on the chest, the giant wings, the starfield cape, etc), in practice they kind of get in each others' way rather than complementing each other. Throw in the rather uninspired generic clothing and giant ribbon for no reason and she just looks kind of weird.

I think it's on the contrary. Having a single feature of her removed would shift the attention to the left side of her body, making her look too asymetrical. The eye draws some of the attention to her center, and the enormous wings and cape makes her sillhouette seem more evened out. The ribbon is so she won't die :V

Design-wise, I think she was simply brilliant, being an excession in a game where most characters are recognized by their dresses, hair color or hats. The only weird thing imo is how her hair isn't divided, making it seem like her cape and wings aren't attached to her.

Even alphes overlook this... but the artist who drew her in SoPM divided her hair.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Chuckolator on September 21, 2012, 02:44:57 AM
This is what TD Seiga looks like under her clothes.
You awful man, remove those immediately.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Darth_Sirov on September 21, 2012, 06:07:05 AM
You awful man, remove those immediately.

This reply made me lol in conjunction with the username.

But that template is so like Ao Usagi's
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: pineyappled on September 21, 2012, 06:27:17 AM
You awful man, remove those immediately.
If it makes you feel any better, I did my zombie waifu.
(http://i.imgur.com/qOdPt.jpg)
Which is admittedly not that bad aside from those godawful hands.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Imosa on September 21, 2012, 11:06:48 AM
I also kind of dislike Utsuho's design. While individually the parts seem like they should be cool (the red eye on the chest, the giant wings, the starfield cape, etc), in practice they kind of get in each others' way rather than complementing each other. Throw in the rather uninspired generic clothing and giant ribbon for no reason and she just looks kind of weird.
I pretty much agree. I always thought she was a very busy looking character. however I feel like everything could be fixed with a better color scheme.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 21, 2012, 02:56:18 PM
The problem with saying it's just his style, though, is that it... isn't.

Only I didn't say it's just his style. I did say time concerns probably go into it. But there is clearly a style he has, that he has developed, and chooses to use.

ZUN's arms, legs, to some degree torsos, and blatantly his faces aren't just that way because of his style - they're that way, and obviously so, because ZUN fundamentally does not understand how to realistically portray anatomical features. That's why instead of proper calves, all of his characters have anaemic sausages attached to their knees. It's why he can't draw a chin to save his life and there's no sense of how his characters' skulls actually sit inside their heads.

Yeah, and what's up with Fred Flintstone? His head is the size of his torso! Homer Simpson's eyeballs are halfway out of their sockets, Ren's legs are way too short to support his torso, and don't even get me started on the Moomins.

You see where I'm going here, right? You're taking a very narrow selection of criteria for what constitutes "good" illustration - in this case, proportion, values, and drawing chins properly - and using it as the yard stick, when there are many, many examples of fantastic illustrations that ignore all of these things.

I'm not saying that the only right way to do art is to do it realistically, I'm just saying that until you have that fundamental knowledge of form, value and color (of which ZUN only has the  latter, and only to a certain degree), you won't be able to stylize in a deliberate, informed way, and mistakes, poor choices and lack of study will be apparent.

Ah, now I see where you're coming from. This is the kind of artistic prescriptivism that people have been hammering on for centuries, with regards to illustration, music, writing and so forth, and it's just demonstrably false. You do not need "fundamental knowledge" of anything to produce good art. It helps, and it can certainly give you an enriching education on styles and techniques, but they are not prerequisites for "good" art.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Zerviscos on September 21, 2012, 03:15:49 PM
His anatomy is pretty bad. Fan arts are more likely to be more prominent as being considered the "canon" for those who aren't even familiar with the series. If I'm going to guess, ZUN never really mind any of these. Ever since HRtP, his illustrations looks weird, deformed, and whack. Then again, he never cared, nor even he tried to improve even if it's a long shot. We can clearly see all his illustrations vary so much that it's different in each series. If he's lazy, he'll just recycle a character image and put it on another game(just like Cirno is PCB stage 1).

All I got to say is...ZUN is a drunkard bastard who said he keeps drawing little girls 'cause he can't draw mature women and the fact he can't draw well, but he doesn't really care.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 21, 2012, 03:24:01 PM
Yeah, and what's up with Fred Flintstone? His head is the size of his torso! Homer Simpson's eyeballs are halfway out of their sockets, Ren's legs are way too short to support his torso, and don't even get me started on the Moomins.

... Except it's clear that ZUN isn't trying to make the next Fred Flintstone or Homer Simpson; he's clearly attempting an anime-esque style of illustration. Apples to oranges is all I'm saying.

You do not need "fundamental knowledge" of anything to produce good art.

Er... Yes, one does. "Fundamental knowledge" can account for simply an acute observation of one's surroundings and how they appear from their perspective; the person may not know the terms that apply to such observations, but there clearly needs to be some sort of awareness in one's brain in order to create any sort of art, regardless of others' opinions of the results~
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 21, 2012, 03:30:43 PM
... Except it's clear that ZUN isn't trying to make the next Fred Flintstone or Homer Simpson; he's clearly attempting an anime-esque style of illustration. Apples to oranges is all I'm saying.

How is it apples to oranges? We're talking about illustrations. This doesn't change what I'm saying - there are countless "good" illustrative works that follow few if any rules of proportion and value.

Er... Yes, one does. "Fundamental knowledge" can account for simply an acute observation of one's surroundings and how they appear from their perspective; the person may not know the terms that apply to such observations, but there clearly needs to be some sort of awareness in one's brain in order to create any sort of art, regardless of others' opinions of the results~

No, one really doesn't. Learning fundamentals such as body proportions, sheet music and the Inverted Pyramid of journalism can help you improve tremendously, but they are not absolute pre-requisites of good art, and there are thousands of examples across history and media that demonstrate this.

Ultimately, this is an unresolvable argument, I think. Prescriptivists are always going to insist that "good" art can be objectively measured, while everyone else is going to go by their tastes.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 21, 2012, 03:54:45 PM
And anime characters are all about proportion, right? This doesn't change what I'm saying - there are countless illustrative works that follow few if any rules of proportion and value.

First, TheRadicalX has a reference for his opinion: anime-style artwork. ZUN is clearly working based off of the proportions commonly demonstrated in anime, manga, and the like; therefore, the anime, manga, and the like are the point of reference here in this discussion. Second, by saying that ZUN shouldn't have to care about--or even be knowledgeable of--such proportions or values that he clearly is, in fact, already aware of and comparing himself to... actually comes across as demeaning his ability a bit, in my honest opinion. Just saying~ :wat:
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Zerviscos on September 21, 2012, 04:06:14 PM
Ah, now I see where you're coming from. This is the kind of artistic prescriptivism that people have been hammering on for centuries, with regards to illustration, music, writing and so forth, and it's just demonstrably false. You do not need "fundamental knowledge" of anything to produce good art. It helps, and it can certainly give you an enriching education on styles and techniques, but they are not prerequisites for "good" art.
Er... Yes, one does. "Fundamental knowledge" can account for simply an acute observation of one's surroundings and how they appear from their perspective; the person may not know the terms that apply to such observations, but there clearly needs to be some sort of awareness in one's brain in order to create any sort of art, regardless of others' opinions of the results~
I'm gonna cut you guys off there.

As far as for this "fundamental knowledge" goes. It's also clear that one doesn't simply see art as good art. You cannot just make good art like that without having something known. Throughout art's history it's always been like that. Good art varies from time to time, and person to person. Though having little knowledge seems unlikely to actually produce good art. Let's talk about history. Dadaism in the 19th century, became fundamental for anti-movements 'cause it was a way of expression, their idea came from older arts they "learned" and simply wants to change it, and ridicule common customs. Surrealism came into mind in the early 20th century as the changing of the old ways of dadaism, as dadaism was a way like expressionism did as a tone of underlying madness, as said by Salvador Dali, for madmen; "The only difference between a madman and myself, is that I am not mad." It was more of visualizing in-depth imagination(not only dreams, but everything else you would "think" is surreal or can exist in the subconscious).  It was clearly a much more harder-to-understand movement, but the thing that makes it good is that "it's so wrong, that makes it so right".

Thing is. There might be no direct "fundamental knowledge" to produce good art, but there is in fact a need of anything you will find knowledgeable to make good art. As art is not something completely easy to understand for the common folk, as they will always criticize, and that's why you need a certain degree to have an idea pop up. It's not the fundamentals of art if we're talking about proportions, anatomy, perspective, or anything else, but there are the "fundamentals" of art(google if you don't know). Art doesn't need to be precise to be good art. Again, history...Expressionism, Pablo Picasso, a known expressionist, and his painting "Starry Night"...it did not perceive right perspective, nor right lighting. Edward Munch's "The Scream", again no right anatomy, wavy lines, yet depicting motion. Yes, we all know that "dem damn expressionist are mad bastards", but they are good art, and they did get their "knowledge" from experience. Same goes with neoclassicism, having older art styles, yet differing some points. Impressionism, having seen the basis of what you see as art.

Lastly again, for the fundamentals of art. You can't make art, if you don't even know them. It doesn't have to be exact as perceived by our 3-dimensional reality. As long as it has the fundamentals of art, it is art(again, google if you don't know.) Minimalism, is a good example of how the "common folk" see as "what the hell is this?!" art.

So going back to ZUN. ZUN, doesn't really mind he doesn't follow the right proportions. Thing is, other than he is drunk, he is quite a bit stubborn, and lazy for a room of improvement, IF HE IS FOLLOWING the traditional way of creating manga/anime characters. Then again...did he really try to improve ever since PC-98's HRtP up to Window's TD? Maybe he did quite a bit, but not by much.
 
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 21, 2012, 04:11:55 PM
Second, by saying that ZUN shouldn't have to care about--or even be knowledgeable of--such proportions or values that he clearly is, in fact, already aware of and comparing himself to... actually comes across as demeaning his ability a bit, in my honest opinion. Just saying~ :wat:

What? No. This is either deliberately obtuse or just dishonest. Saying that a person does not need to know The Sacred Fundamentals Of Art to produce good art does not demean his drawings in any way, shape or form.

My entire point is that I am a bit tired of folks who preach from their ivory tower about their being some objective standard for what constitutes "good" art. It's a pointless argument that has been going on for millenia, no matter how many new works come and go, no matter how forms change, no matter how, yes - shocker of shockers - you don't even actually need to know whatever these nebulous "fundamentals" are to end up producing something loved by many, many people. There's always going to be a group of people who treat art like math, insisting that X = X when X can equal toothpick.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Zerviscos on September 21, 2012, 04:18:05 PM
What? No. This is either deliberately obtuse or just dishonest. Saying that a person does not need to know The Sacred Fundamentals Of Art to produce good art does not demean his drawings in any way, shape or form.

My entire point is that I am a bit tired of folks who preach from their ivory tower about their being some objective standard for what constitutes "good" art. It's a pointless argument that has been going on for millenia, no matter how many new works come and go, no matter how forms change, no matter how, yes - shocker of shockers - you don't even actually need to know whatever these nebulous "fundamentals" are to end up producing something loved by many, many people. There's always going to be a group of people who treat art like math, insisting that X = X when X can equal toothpick.
I myself is not constituting what good art is. That's completely impossible to quite do.

ZUN did not go by eliminating the fundamentals of art...as of again, the fundamentals are:
Elements:
line
shape
value
etc

Principles:
proportion
emphasis
movement
etc

Others:
contrast
dominance
symbolism
etc

ZUN does not need to learn all these, as this are already acquired by his mind already. As again, saying that knowledge is needed, as knowledge can be passed down from influence, and experience.
ZUN has everything of what makes an art. The same goes as what little kindergarten kids doodle, as it is still defined as art, as long as it has one of the fundamentals(again go back to what I said about "minimalists").
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 21, 2012, 04:21:55 PM
ZUN does not need to learn all these, as this are already acquired by his mind already. As again, saying that knowledge is needed, as knowledge can be passed down from influence, and experience.
ZUN has everything of what makes an art. The same goes as what little kindergarten kids doodle, as it is still defined as art, as long as it has one of the fundamentals(again go back to what I said about "minimalists").

Yeah, you and I are in agreement. I was responding to folks who were chiming in to say that his art is "objectively" bad, and then tried to back this up with "evidence".

Just to be clear, guys - I am not saying that an artist should not learn the fundamentals of their chosen medium. They can help tremendously in the creation of good art, and can be useful tools for an artist to convey what they want to convey. What I take issue with is the very idea that there is even such a thing as "objectively bad" art, let alone that learning certain fundamentals is necessary to make "good" art.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: BL2W on September 21, 2012, 04:33:32 PM
You cannot just make good art like that without having something known.
Thing is. There might be no direct "fundamental knowledge" to produce good art, but there is in fact a need of anything you will find knowledgeable to make good art.

This was, indeed, all I was trying to say about that particular subject. Thank you for summarizing it~ :)
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: TheRadicalX on September 21, 2012, 08:24:42 PM
Bah, my tone is still more aggressive than I intend it to be. I didn't mean to turn this into a heated argument, sorry. xD

I'm not saying that in order to ever produce a good drawing, an artist needs to go through years of rigorous study! I'm not saying that any person who does art without having done that studying will ever and on be incapable of producing anything we can judge as "good" until they pass that magical point where they've done enough studies to be considered "good." There is no magical point and there is no precise scale. If I was prescribing that, I'd be trying to support a horribly illogical binary notion of skill that was just completely at odds with reality.

But I don't think many artists could produce art that is consistently good or appealing without that sort of studying, no matter what sort of art they're trying to do. They won't have the knowledge to be able to deliberately choose what parts of their picture they stylize and in what way. So one time they might hit on the perfect combination of symbols to produce a really aesthetically appealing drawing. Take a look through any teenager's deviantArt page and I'm sure you'll find a gem or two, depending on your own tastes. But the odds of them producing that same phenomenon over and over again get lower the further you go on - you can't just follow a formula you don't understand (eyes are this collection of lines, mouths are this collection of lines, etc. etc. ...) and expect success every single time.

I think most of the great artists that En posted certainly bent, broke and outright ignored the rules in their pictures, and those pictures came out fine. And that's not something I'm trying to argue shouldn't happen! Again, quality is not a binary and the enjoyment of art is subjective. But in order to do the things they did, each one of those artists studied. [nsfw][nsfw]Salvador Dali (http://www.salvador-dali.org/dali/en_darreres-adquisicions.html?ID=W0000445)[/nsfw] [nsfw]studied. (http://www.royal-painting.com/htmllarge/large-4495.html)[/nsfw] [nsfw]Pablo Picasso (http://www.wikipaintings.org/en/pablo-picasso/academical-study)[/nsfw] [nsfw]studied. (http://www.wikipaintings.org/en/pablo-picasso/plaster-male-torso-1893)[/nsfw] Edvard Munch... well, I couldn't really find any works explicitly labelled as studies, but he did realism (http://www.wikipaintings.org/en/edvard-munch/self-portrait-1882) too.

The above NSFW links to academical studies and realistic works by a couple grand masters, I marked them NSFW because, well, studies imply nudity.

I'm not going to boast about how I could probably find studies and realistic portrayals from any artist you can name because I know that's arrogant and that that way lies madness, but these are all great men famed for their flouting of the artistic convention of their times. Before and during that, they studied and worked in realistic fashion. I'm (again) not saying that the only good art is art done in a traditional style, or with perfectly correct anatomy, or that art can only be good if the artist has passed some arbitrary point in their studies that now marks them as "good." None of that is true, and it'd be daft to suggest it.

But in order to produce consistently good, appealing art, you either need to be lucky enough to win against the odds despite not really understanding the choices you make in a piece or the symbol sets you're using, or you need to study. And I'm passionate about this because I never had anyone tell me that. I just kept doodling away as a teenager without any real understanding of what I was doing, and the public idea of "art" as being some sort of strange hedge magic meant that there was never any indication that hey, all the great artists did studies. All the great artists worked their asses off to get to the level of skill they did. And it seems daft to me that I didn't realize that before, but I never had the information. My art has improved by leaps and bounds since I started doing studies, and I'm still just mediocre.

So I guess what I'm saying after all this is that there's no magical formula to get good at an artist, but like anything else you have to put the time in and actually study your medium. ZUN clearly either doesn't have the time or doesn't care to do that - and I can't really blame him, the dude juggles like five different mediums and is excellent in most of them. So he remains a poor illustrative artist. This doesn't mean I'm saying it's bad to like his drawings or that no one should enjoy them! I'm just saying that, at least to me, most of the mistakes he makes are actual mistakes, not deliberately breaking from convention for a desired effect, and that means that whether I'm fond of them or not, to me they're poor drawings.

EDIT: I'm getting the feeling I don't actually understand the use of the NSFW tag.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Tengukami on September 21, 2012, 09:32:28 PM
Thanks for the thoughtful response. For the record, as a writer, I do believe that a writer should learn certain writing conventions, whether journalism or fiction. This will assist them tremendously in being able to produce good writing. These conventions are tools. Now, you can buy tools from a store, or you can make them yourself - one is infinitely easier than the other, but both can produce consistently good work.

I appreciate the clarification of where you're coming from here. I just bristle at any notion of an objective standard of "good" or "bad" in the arts, because that notion has been wielded by convention to repress pioneering forms and styles. But the notion that learning convention helps produce good art, yeah, no dispute there.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: haoreos2 on September 22, 2012, 02:38:00 AM
Reply in Haiku:
Full consensus unlikely;
Art is subjective.


There's this cool Asian guy in a hat;
And while his art isn't really "all that",
His designs are amazing,
So fans' inspiration be raising,
Thus producing great fanworks; that's that.


Some think it a purposeful stroke,
To make his art seem like a joke;
With too much on his plate,
He did delegate,
To relieve himself of such a yoke.

For the drunken man in Japan,
Who drew but a passable Ran,
Had fans of great skill,
Bearing pens, (or a quill),
Who improved on the art (as his plan!)

This probably isn't the case,
But it's a fun concept to embrace,
To use art most call bad
To promote a new fad,
Through doujins and say, Hinaface.


A closing statement:
PCB Sakuya rocks
You cannot deny.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 22, 2012, 02:42:51 AM
Haiku answer

Someone give this man a medal.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Aba Matindesu! on September 22, 2012, 09:06:35 AM
Btw, EoSD Sakuya:
http://i.imgur.com/TFZ6s.jpg

These are the two of the funniest expressions in the series. I don't understand how someone can hate it :(
Why have I never noticed the ripped sleeves and, more importantly, the blood on her knives?
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: Ikari on September 22, 2012, 09:55:44 PM
Why have I never noticed the ripped sleeves and, more importantly, the blood on her knives?

I... I never noticed it either.

I'm afraid to play EoSD now.
Title: Re: Are people exaggerating ZUN's drawings?
Post by: chema1994 on September 23, 2012, 06:16:46 PM
He's a great composer and programmer, his drawings aren't the best of the best but are still aceptable.