##Vote: SBI ISO'd SB and I'm noticing a pattern that he switches sides constantly on people he's voting, and switching his reads far too often, and sheeping wagons while not giving solid opinions on anyone else he's not voting.
On Mitsuki D1, he initially
votes Mitsuki
, then unvotes to
vote Bard (voting Mitsuki). He still [ur=https://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,18246.msg1174970.html#msg1174970l]voices dislike of Mitsuki[/url] though doesn't vote her.
Then nitpicks her again despite his vote on bard, but his vote on Bard feels like a pressure vote more then actual scumread.
Notice how he's on the fence about Serela and Skypal. It's early in the game, yeah, but all of his posts lack solid conviction on a scumread.
He drops Bard and
votes Dormio in an apparent bandwagon hop, then vanishes. Even his Dormio vote seems to lack conviction,
After he tries to
snipe Oarfish at deadline, he continues to post not to push a Dormio lynch, but to dissuade an Oarfish lynch with more
weak stances and
reliance on meta as opposed to quoting game content and really casing Oarfish.
His D2 content is so far a
single post that completely lacks a single solid and original opinion.
I can buy into Bard's case. It feels like most of NNR's content has been kind of vague (finding Bard's usage of meta bad but not giving a reason for it) or pushing obviously after things that are obviously scummy (Zak saying he was going to lurk, etc). The way he constantly flips around on SkyPal that also confuses me and feels kind of exaggerated? Reads change and stuff but at the same time flipping around every time a new post shows up feels very wrong.
He criticizes me in a way that fails to give an actual stance that I'm scum, instead toeing it and saying 'NNR feels bad and I'm sheeping Bard'.
Made even more forced-sounding with the criticism on my lack of reason for disliking Bard's meta. SB loves to follow meta, so he should know that I kneejerk all the time at the mention of meta because it's lazy and unreliable. He thinks it's vauge now though? I haven't even scumread Bard either, so his whole criticism doesn't make sense.
kind of want to vote Rawr because his content is really sparse and uninspiring where it exists. I also remember his alignment generally being transparent in some of his town games but I haven't seen Town!Rawr in forever so I dunno.
I don't even know about Oarfish. I think I was townreading him at deadline yesterday because the cases on him that caused the near turbo were terrible but at the same time I caught a Serela post I missed the first time around that actually had some stuff I can agree with in it? Mafia sucks.
Then, hypocritically, he proceeds to be completely on-the-fence about Rawr and Oarfish, flip-flopping on Oarfish in particular after fighting against his lynch yesterday.
Refa's Eli case is good and I feel like Eli's BT vote today doesn't make sense. Cutting out five minutes of discussion time isn't incredibly anti-town unless you think BT blocked scum!Oarfish's lynch... except Eli states that he's townreading Oarfish. I also don't think that the way he seems to have dropped Sky (by not mentioning him at all) is realistic if he was scumreading him because he was Eli's top suspect yesterday. So the fact that he didn't even give Sky a passing mention on it's own is really weird, and when his reasons from voting BT aren't very solid it makes even less sense.
Finally, today's vote is just a bandwagon sheep, showing SB just isn't going to scumhunt himself this game.
