I explained this before. The more people elaborate on what they're commenting on the more likely I will be to get a read on them. I don't know what would make a townie or scummy response until I read it.
Yeah, but I don't see how you would ever get a town/scum read from that line of questioning (at least, during the RVS voting stage anyways)...whatever. At this point, this just seems like a difference in opinion rather than something actually worth pursuing.
Serela implied his vote was serious here.
Serelaiously what is this, I don't even. I can't even comprehend what she was thinking there. Send help.
My vote on Serela was (and is) 100% serious.
Zvarri! It is all becoming clear to me now. Your initial vote was based off of a lack of understanding over scum intent (why didn't you ask Serela if her vote was serious before voting her?), yet you stuck to your vote anyways despite having no strong feelings towards their future posts. I figured your initial vote could be a reaction test (which would explain you sticking to it despite initially weak reasons as well as technically taking into account his future posts even without analyzing them), hence the question...but then it wasn't. So uh...yeah, it's pretty scummy how you held onto it for so long despite having no strong feelings towards her replies. Maybe you didn't have a better vote at the time, but you did by
this point.
The fact that he provided justification the way he did is what's scummy. He placed conviction on his vote, then in his later post (the one I cited), waffled on his read but not enough to indicate that he was serious about maintaining his vote. In fact, until he said 60% at the end, his context made it seem like he actually didn't want to keep his vote on Selrara
*p.edit
is Bard really this abrasive normally? I don't remember him being so kurt in our SF games. Seems a bit out of character to me
Oh, I misunderstood your point entirely. Go me. So he's not scummy because he overjustified himself, but because he waffled on a read that he earlier had conviction on despite no reason to do so (because town can waffle on their scumreads, but with no post from Serela, Sky's waffle doesn't make any sense)? Just want to make sure that we're on the same page here, because that's pretty legit (would sheep tier). While I've got your attention though, what are your thoughts on other players? You haven't really talked about anyone besides Sky, and they're all becoming rather jealous of him!
He played similarly in Unnamed Mafia.
I honestly don't get why you people assume the worst and think I'm being a jerk.
Probably your avatar. Looks like a jerk to me.
Zak is scummy because lurking is scummy. Popping in with the chance to give content and then stating you're not is scummy, he doesn't even bother to read the thread, The notion he'd have 'no idea what to do' is crap, plenty of other people are throwing votes down, he can just as well.
Lurking isn't scummy unless it's done for an extended period of time. Obviously he read the thread considering his gutread on Mitsuki. I agree that he could have done more at that point, but I'm not really bothered by that unless he continues to do so.
As far as refuge in audacity, I wouldn't know, as I don't analyze meta very much (as I tend to call it out anyway). If I was to say, it's that Zak generally has a habit of not contributing much anyway, and I'd rather be rid of a player who lurks all game sooner rather then later, regardless of alignment.
This point is really bad. I can't see town being so apathetic to the lynch of a player for reasons that they know aren't alignment indicative.
The actual reasoning behind both Mitsuki's vote and the votes on Mitsuki seem well-placed, but I don't think they're particularly scummy.
You're missing the point (deliberately or not). If Mitsuki's vote is perfectly fine to you, then there must be something wrong with the votes on her (even if they're not scummy). You cannot actually be fine with both of them at the same time, that's...not how logic works.
I find Bard to be acting suspiciously tolerant.
Yknow what's scummy to me? Claiming scum, then disappearing! Everyone feel free to vote Dormio along with me.
You're joking, right? People are complaining about Bard being too abrasive and you're saying that he's suspiciously tolerant.
Kind of assuming the same about your Dormio vote. What bothers me more here is what that implies, namely that you don't really have any thoughts on the rest of the game.
Dormio could you clearify what you're even trying to ask him? It just looks like bullhockey trying to trip him up.
Cut: :/
##Vote: Dormio
Please explain your reasoning here, because you uh...didn't.
Maybe I'm just biased because Bard's posting style is really entertaining, but I'm townreading him myself. SB's reasoning on him was fine for the time (while I agreed with Bard's initial point on Mitsuki, it wasn't exactly enough for me to get a read on the dude himself), but his responses have been good (I react similarly when people scumread me) and he is actively pursuing his scumread. More importantly perhaps is that the scumreads on him are either based on his meta (don't know) or his tone (don't care), so they're sheep unworthy.
