Oh God, catch up post!
@Shadoweh 74: That's great. But that doesn't remove the fact that you couched the newb parts of your post in scummy terms. Why?
@rdj 75: Your case is bad and you should feel bad. First, no need to cite the posts that have nothing interesting. Second, if you aren't going to stand behind your point, don't use it. That completely destroys your entire case. The main thing you lack is conviction, though logical reasoning also would help. Right now you're saying he made an off hand comment that may or may not be scummy, and nothing else is interesting.
@capt. h. 76: This is actually interesting.
@Hele 77: Yes, but what's the point of the speculation?
@Hele 81: All right. Define who is lurking as of...hour 22, when you made that post!
@Bard 82: I'll :V you fuckshit >=[! (jk, ilu Bard

)
@rdj 83: Those are not opinions, those are reportings. Give opinions, thank you.
Dammit Bard 84, quit stealin' future me's thunder. Pasthole >=[!
@Bard 86: Well, you WERE Scum last time you picked only one target! Kidding aside, this post is fairly solid.
@Zak 89: Active lurking in 23 hours. Awesome. Hell, you voted me with even less hours. I think I was asleep when you did that. And I was running DnD when you posted that. Then I went out for a few hours.
Oh, not to mention the misrep. Where did I ever say anything about "getting back to you in a week or so"? At all?
So, on the one hand, I know that bad cases aren't scummy but...last time Zak made a bad case against me, he was scum. Not to mention his complete failure to account for reality.
Hell,
##Vote Zakeri. There you go!
@rdj 95: You're missing the point. My issue with Shadoweh isn't the newbie attack. It's the fact her list was phrased in a manner that wants you to think she wants newbie lynches. The implication was that she'd jump on anyone taking the bait.
I do not see how this helps catch scum. I do see how it makes pretty cases. So, I'm underwhelmed with Shadoweh. The other issue is your entire post takes no solid stance. You do not have "pro town but maybe not" as an option. Pick. Town. Or. Scum. For everyone mentioned. Do not include null tells, they don't matter. Ideally, just post Scum: Because Post X had scum intent, due to Y. Town read posts are useless. (Town reads are not)
@capt h. 98: Why the fuck does it matter what actions Bard does? Unless he's fullclaiming roles and actions,
you ignore what the fuck he's doing and scum hunt. Quit. Wasting. Time. Scumhunt!
@Caedo 99: Pro tip, it can be.
@capt. h. 103: Great. So...scum intent where?
@Caedo 107: Lovely. You're policy voting. No. Consider what Bard has to gain from lying? Please?
@capt. h. 111: Is anti town scummy? Further, what precisely makes his actions anti town? No, seriously, this interests me.
The accusations of active lurking a little over 24 hours into the game amuse the fuck out of me. That said, HH's post isn't bad.
@Hele 114: Amazing contribution, simply wonderful.
##Unvote, Vote HelepolisHow about you post opinions about players, guy? Such as, hey, Hanged Hourai. That sounds like a great idea. What do you think of him accusing you of active lurking?
God DAMMIT people, why do you have to post what I'm posting!?
I see Active lurking is going to be the words of the day. Did it occur to you that my prodding is helping determine where my vote should go? I'm trying to get information.
@Hele 119: Your post says that you aren't going to contribute anything at all. That helps scum more than town. You do realize that you have to give as well, right? Opinions and where you stand are THE most important things to keep transparent in mafia. Being wrong isn't scummy. Being unopinionated is. It's one thing to say that in RVS. It's a whole 'nother to say it after things are getting into the game. There's a lot to look at! So you know what would be cool? Rereading the game, trying to figure out who's actions help scum most, and then...and this is the hard part...telling us what you think!
@rdj 124: Good news! You bleed town! Bad news! It's derp town! First, you should have a vote down (cue cries of hypocrisy), secondly, you don't backtrack to rectify errors. You fix errors by being proactive and showing us what you've fixed, not admitting you messed up. So...I still have no idea who you find scummy! Enlighten me!
@Shadoweh 129: Newbie train? Where? I seem to have the biggest wagon, if it can be called such.
@capt. h.'s page 5 posts: HI FLAVOR SPECULATION!
Stop. Now. Flavor speculation is anti town at best and scummy at worst. The fact you aren't producing ANYTHING ELSE besides it makes it scummier. If you want a fuller explanation of why, ask me. I'd rather not inflate this post more.
@Hele 136: No, we're not upset at all. We just think you're scum. Nothing personal~
@Zak 137: Your case still sucks. See? I can repeat myself too and add nothing new at all!
##Unvote, Vote ZakeriFuck, BOTH of you can die for all I care!
@Shadoweh: Lol wut? There's like, no ignore of giving opinions at all? Maybe [[citation needed]] would get my point across better?
OH MY GOD CAUGHT UP! tl;dr post incoming!