To clarify, I was a vanilla with a role-switching item. Thinking about the item/power distinction, I have no idea about whether I'm copying their roles, their items, or both. (it seems like a role however). Also, I will clarify that although I can talk to Mode, I have no mod-confirmation that he is town at all. Also, I was given the opportunity to copy an ability right off the bat, which seemed like a N0... either that or it's just special for me. I did nothing in between N2 and D3, as I said my item changed due to the mystery bomb.
) If Slaves inspects items, how did he get anything like what Purvis said?
2) If Trance is pretty much obvious scum, why is he missing from the scumlist?
3) If my role is only good for Town, why the generic suspicion? I've made things more or less as clear as they're going to be.
And donut, Trance I labelled obvious scum in that post, and would have hammered if I had access to a computer yesterday. Also, on N2, I drew you and that revealed that you have the pastry item, for that gave me the ability to pastry someone as well.
Does this or does this not seem like a scum ability? If so, why didn't you do anything to suggest that Eve may be scum on Day 1?
As for Eve, well, that kind of ability seems impossible to determine alignment from (sounds possible for town too?), and I did not want to risk something from that. Everyone may be scum actually, which makes that distinction weird.
I'm quite happy that you 'established' that I'm fakeclaiming. Furthermore, said that it was a cross between Violentia, donut, and Mode as the remaining scum due to not having the role solidity (watchers could be scum) or past play to confirm that. Lastly, why would scum think up of a N0 for fun, and how is it a definite scumtell? It seems more WIFOM-ey than a scum tell, after all.
---
Alright, thinking about it, donut's role seems to be more suited for town than scum (sounds strange for scum anyway, they would protect no one other than their scum-mates anyway. But it still is possible, and I'm not very happy about his play sans role, what with parroting following other people's points regarding me on D2, the whole supposed defending and WIFOM on D2, and the relatively bad D2 (voting me for 'lining up lynches'?). Even his latest vote on me is not exactly comprehensively given, what about accusing Mode on the sole basis as me being his scumpartner. But on role alone, and perhaps the putting of the secret vote somewhere else on D2, other people are worthy of consideration as well.
Purvis has kept up solid activity throughout the game and is the main instigator of many cases like the donut one, which do utilize plenty of original thought and active scumhunting (as opposed to donut's passive, defensively-oritented scumhunting). I would think that one needs actual reasons to implicate him rather than the mere thought that he could be scum as well. Scum could have a rolecop as well, however, but I think his play is great enough to discount that chance of him being scum.
Violentia is one of those horrible enigmas which one cannot make anything out of, which is why I suggested to lynch her D2. I'll go for noobtown, but I'm still quite wary.
GODrake is most definitely town.
Mode, I have not looked at very much at all during the game (as did anyone until D3, I would like to point out), but while her presence has been strong for the majority of D1, with that questioning of donut which was pretty good, she kind of disappeared off the map on D2 and D3, with not a case I remember of (coasting behind the lurkwagons on D2 without much reasoning, going through motions of role madness on D3). While at the very least donut did put up solid activity and rhetoric about how he wasn't scum on D2, and participated in calling me out (rightfully) on my claim, Mode did not do anything. Really seems to me that Mode is coasting by the game, role-madness or not, not in the Violentia way but the scummy way. She needs some posting on who is scum and why.
##Vote: Mode
