I'd like to point out that the person who objected to picking easy teams has done nothing but ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
I thought about looking up the pre-game betting lines on all of our choices, but then i remembered that i'm lazy and that i don't like arguing with people i've never met on the internet. so whatever.
and then i changed my mind, because i might as well be fair about this and check. plus, i'm curious now. i'll edit once i check everyones cumulative line.
EDIT:
alrighty! lets look at the closing lines from our picks
px +6.5, -3.5, -2.5 CUMULATIVE: +.5
kagiyamahina -2, PK, -3.5 CUMULATIVE: -5.5
kilga -2.5, -14, +3 CUMULATIVE: -13.5
source:
http://www.footballlocks.com/nfl_lines_week_2.shtml (you can scroll down to get links to the other weeks)
so, px has made the riskiest picks overall from our small sample size, and kilga has the least, although thats skewed by how massively favored the patriots were that week. other than that one outlier, we've generally picked pretty evenly matched games. px has chosen the biggest underdog, i've chosen narrow favorites (except for one evenly matched game), and kilga doesn't really have a trend, having chosen differently in each of his 3 games.
all in all pretty inconclusive, really. after only 3 games each, theres not much to point at.