Sky's case on me is worrysome because it's practically the exact same case he made on me in An Untitled Mafia, the only real different being that it lacks the parts that I told him raised enough red flags for me to be certain that he was scum in that game. I don't know if this is legit gut acting up, or if I'm just being paranoid, but it's enough to make me want to switch votes to him.
I'm clearly at the point where I'm overthinking things to the point of regressing, since pretty much everyone worth holding an opinion on is starting to read full null to me right now, and since I decided to spend the day with friends instead of reading, my brain is turned to mush and I'm up way past the deadline for sleeping. The strongest feeling I have right now is paranoia regarding his case against me, and remembering why I hated the way he was talking early day one - specifcally the part where he makes a bad case on Bardiche and instead of acknowledging others telling him it's bad, he sweeps it under the rug with a case on NekoNekoRex (Who flipped scum) and then immediately switched to voting with the case on Raikaria one post later. Relevent post for this are 69, 98, and 99.
I still don't like Dan, it would be easy for him to compare my previous day's posting style to my town style from other games and claim he thinks I'm town while letting me fade away into the twilight. It would also help him avoid suspicion compared to just quickhammering me to get it over with.
There's nothing to say about Sky's vote on NNR but then there's really nothing to say about the wagon in general that changes my opinion on anyone. Serela was the first one to dissect the logic behind Schezo's claim and made the right choice, but even though I want to throw up the Serela is always town stop picking on him hands into the air, Logic is a very easy thing for a scum to use to his own advantage, especially when bussing other scum, so I'll just have to throw up my null hands instead augh.
(Although speaking of using logic, now that I think about it, Skypal trying to come up with scum pair interactions looks more and more suspicious. It's actually clever, but it seems he's trying to set up lynches in a row while disguising it as scumhunting via typical methods of logic synthing)
I think the Crux of the Case against Raikaria is the fact that he switched from a bad case on Sky to a worse case on me. It's technically sound logic but I don't feel like that in itself is derived from scum logic. Schezo makes a Strong argument for the case he made against me being anti-town, but it feels too sincere to be a pro-scum move. I guess what I mean is it really feels like He was omgusing Sky as town, went back to read my posts, and agreed that I was surface level suspicious enough for a vote.
Finding the post where Serela votes Raikaria is hard because I assume it's after all of the posts he defends Raikaria in, but the vote count says no it isn't.
Ahh I found it. wait, now I have to find the reasoning in a different post augh.
The way he ends up describing it is mostly gut? I guess ... I don't really have a choice but to accept it, even though it's kind of icky.
I would like Serela to go back and extrapolate more from the posts that made him go "I guess town does this, but..." Or at least define the things that come after the but.
Order of most to least suspicious to me in Sky in first, then Dan, Serela, Darkie, with Raikaria bringing up the rear. I would like to clean up all of the points I made against SkyPal but I'm way too tired to continue this post any longer than I absolutely have to.
##Unvote: ActionDan
##Vote: Sky_Paladin
