K so Skypal is pretty awful. Mostly his cases are shit. Like, utterly. I made a post already on his first text wall (response
here) so I won't reiterate that.
Post #98 is a pretty awful case on me, following that
Checks Bardiche's vote on Serela with 'youdbestbejoking.gif'. Why? Despite my earlier misgivings, Bardiche's vote was quite reasonable.
Reads like backpedaling to attack me which is really bad.
"since he tends to step it up under 'pressure'" <-- Incorrect. I go afk as this board's meta is to lynch active, contributing players. You watched me do it successfully once as your scumbuddy and once as a serial killer
imo if we're talking meta, you first try to defend with a text wall then go quiet afterwards if it doesn't go well, but I'm not voting you for meta, I'm voting you for having bad posts.
"Anyway as far as the post content, it's half and half I guess."
I'll clarify I meant "half of it is pointless fluff".
Lastly he technically OMGUS voted CF7 here.
OMGUS accusations are always icing on the cake especially when the vote on me is a pure jokevote.
This is followed by him completely abandoning his intricately made case in favor of sheeping bard. good job.
#183: [massive retcon about previous posts]
The final point was that I don't place much merit on OMGUS for the same reason I don't actually put much weight in empty unvotes or poor logic.
The reason using OMGUS as an argument doesn't work is that 90% of OMGUS cases are bullshit and based on the fact "X player voted Y who is voting him" despite the fact that X player actually has a good countercase.
Finally #188 catches me off guard for not being a completely awful case. (which I'm not going to quotewall on account of it being fuckhuge long) Actually that redeems him a decent bit.
He's scummy but his current case is gr8. I don't want to lynch him, but at the same time his ratio of badposts to good post is very alarming. Would keep for Day 2.