Are you telling us how to think and behave? Because I want to do different. I don't think your criticism on those points is scumhunting.
So, what is your case now? And what are your opinions on the rest of the game?
Yay, Polaris-kun-sama-san-chan is here \(owo)/
If you're going to be playing as a team, then saying the other head is a separate entity is pointless, because either I have to suspect both of you or neither of you, and you both being contradictory and trying to defend it only makes you both less reliable.
Your posts have been a bit too on the emotional side as well. Your accusations that I'm getting offended or that others are "leaving you with no D1 cases to pursue" aren't making me want to back off either, and don't particularly look like frustrated townie responses moreso then scum trying to guilt-trip people off your case.
Your meta arguments from earlier are not only contradictory, but neither of them make sense. You claim your use of Validon meta was "neutral" but why did you defend him with meta in the first place? Your insisting that Conq was scum for dropping the meta contradicts statements your other head made, and you rampantly push it over better reasons you could be coming up with to vote Conq, which screams desperate "scumhunting" efforts on your part.
After enough pushing, one of you finally drops Conq to persue the lurker newbie, which is a pretty lame out to take. The other one FoS's Serela, who actually has been posting, but your vote doesn't change (only then does CF7 conveniently come back so you can push him more). A prodvote this late in the day is at best a desperate park, imo.
Anyway I'm still pretty happy with my vote, all things considered. I need to look into Serela more though, and maybe BT since I don't have a really comprehensive opinion on him (although my gut leans scum)