So, Vhaltz and Mitsuki. Where to begin?
"The beginning!"
Well I might as well.
I find the entire first exchange between BT and Mitsuki to be very suspicious.
Hey, Val, was the explanation behind not lynching someone during RVS necessary? I don't think it was.
BT, do you find what Validon did suspicious? If so, why?
The need to clarify things even when they're obvious.
##Vote: BT
Validon usually does that kind of thing, so I think it's weird you're qualifying that as suspicious.
To me, this entire exchange looks choreographed.
Of course, this could be a result of my paranoia, but what else am I supposed to work off?
BT's first post seems something more akin to an offhand comment, yet Mitsuki singles out this particular post instead of anything else.
And then BT's response to Mitsuki that just throws me in for a loop.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I can't help but get the feeling that this was a planned conversation aimed at creating the appearance that Mitsuki was attempting to end RVS with a "serious" vote.
It just really strikes me that the responses seem a bit unnatural and the two of them disappear for a while after this series of events.
~D1 scumpair conspiracy theories~ aww yeah.
Of course, since my theories are usually wrong, and I don't really think that BT is scum, I want to focus on the Vhaltz/Mitsuki pair.
Mitsuki finally returns with a post
here and there are a few things I don't like about it.
Mainly that she attempts to defend her position and states that she never gave a clear, nor implied one, towards Validon.
However, doesn't stating that a particular type of behaviour is typical of a player while voting for another player that attacks the aforementioned player for that behaviour contradict that statement? Mitsuki tries to dismiss this as holding a neutral stance, but in that case, why did she feel the need to defend Validon so?
If we look at Vhaltz's post that directly follows Mitsuki's, you'll notice that he votes for Conq.
What for? For attacking Validon, of course.
Something about this heavy defending of Validon from both Vhaltz and Mitsuki simply doesn't sit right with me.
I disagree with several of the points that Vhaltz brings up in his case, but Conq has already addressed that himself so I don't really care but something really stands out to me that I'll get to in just a moment.
What should I do then? Not pursue any cases in D1? I'm rarely convinced that my cases hit scum but if I think there's chances I'll go for it and it's what I have now. I want to think this is frustration speaking and I'll point out that you shouldn't take this personally beyond the game.
This response from Vhaltz causes a lot of alarms to ring in my head.
Instead of simply stating that it's a case that he believes in or something to that effect, Vhaltz launches into an overly emotionally charged response.
By asking something like "What should I do then? Not pursue any cases in D1?", he's implying that Conq is discouraging scumhunting while avoiding the main question that he was asked in the first place.
Something this manipulative should be burned in a fire.
At least, that's my sleep deprived opinion.
When is Shadoweh going to be done with her bloody Shadowrun?