I don't like the idea of using "X is the perfect role for scum to have because then blah blah blah" because that reasoning assumes either blind luck (which means absolutely nothing in terms of pinning blame onto someone) or it means that HW is confirmed scum, which if there's anyone this game I think is definitely not scum, it's HW/Massaca.
No intention to question/request to alter the plan even though you agree your assigned role is poorly suited for you and would be better for someone else?
I'm weak willed like that.
Re: PX vote - Fair enough. It's a weak scumtell that not everybody agrees with, but it's a scumtell for me none-the-less, and I've latched onto it because if I didn't, I'd just be wasting everyone's time.
Wait, what? You want to quick lynch (most likely town) in order to get scum and SK their night kills sooner?
No, I misread the rules. I thought it would stay in defcon 3 if we lynched sooner, which would result in more lynches without NKs.
The rest of the case is just repeatedly poking me for the fact that I believe in my early scumtell of PX (which I do).
Also, yeah, one of the reasons I discarded the IHNN wagon was because I did in fact think I was the scummiest looking person on it, but I didn't say that out loud because I know I'm town.
Not an Edit: Dammit, I wanted to get this post out early to prevent the prod.
Blocking who now?
I thought this might have been a good catch when I saw it, but it was posted before the post where Mass stated the belief that I was scum.
Still, it's worth noting that I don't think they'd have a reason to block the eavesdropper, even if it were possible.