Author Topic: Pictures of Birds Mafia - Game Over (Read 72433 times)

NekoNekoRex · « **Reply #60 on:** October 19, 2012, 02:40:36 AM »

To make it clear, Serela doing essentially nothing in the first hour of the game isn't a reason to vote her either.

Are you just doing that for reactions?

Conqueror · « **Reply #61 on:** October 19, 2012, 02:43:12 AM »

Polaris: So PX is tryhard; why does that make him scum? What's wrong with blindly bandwagoning in the beginning of the game?

Quote from: Polaris on October 19, 2012, 02:24:45 AM

I'll stick with my PX vote for now since the earlier vote shenanigans make me feel like I can't dismiss the earlier posts as "jokey Serela posts".

Explain this because I'm getting a jumble of words that don't make any sense in English.

##Vote: Polaris

Could go for Raikaria too from what I've seen.

NNR: Okay, so is there anyone you'd want to seriously vote? The Serela thing is a bit of a bygone at this point.

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #62 on:** October 19, 2012, 03:10:46 AM »

The fuck happened here?

##Unvote
##Vote Hero999

Opportunistic, or some shit like that.

Affinity · « **Reply #63 on:** October 19, 2012, 03:14:20 AM »

Well, though I don't like it, I can see town doing what Polaris is doing, being flabbergasted in general and trying to fall back on logic. But Ralkaria being 'survivalist town' in the face of a minor suspicion (instead of say, a vote or bandwagon) strikes me as less likely. It's more like he's missing some opinions which should have been there. Scum-leaning responses to scum-leaning stuff are still scum-leaning, after all Flip the chessboard round and round.

Seconding the request for NNR to be more current. PX as well (paradoxically). >_>

@cut: Opportunistic jumps onto opportunistic jumps are SQUAWK-inducing, Dormio, especially when the latter is an ipad post...

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #64 on:** October 19, 2012, 03:16:37 AM »

Problem?

Polaris · « **Reply #65 on:** October 19, 2012, 03:24:46 AM »

I'll stick with my PX vote for now since

the vote shenanigans from earlier (voting Shadoweh and NNR)

make me feel like

I can't dismiss what he did before as "jokey Serela posts" (as quoted from Affinity).

Conq the sentence is gramatically correct, it can't possibly not make sense. If you still don't get it I'll try clarifying again.

Although despite that I'm changing my mind a little?I think I found PX weird because I misremembered the chronology, and thought PX was going on with his Serela shenanigans after he had already ended it, more or less. I don't know, I guess I'm ignoring him for a moment.

Blind bandwagoning in general seems really lame because it gives people an excuse to vote for someone without actually trying, which is pretty scummy, isn't it? People should at least, uh, try to have opinions. Possibly.

I want to say more people should post, but I think everyone who didn't post yet has posted now, so I guess I just have to look over the game again. Likely to switch to Raikaria or maybe just leave my vote on PX.

Polaris · « **Reply #66 on:** October 19, 2012, 03:33:59 AM »

Wait, Conq, are you scum? I have a gut feeling, so I'll be watching you closely. B(

Conqueror · « **Reply #67 on:** October 19, 2012, 03:36:54 AM »

~~Colourless green ideas sleep furiously is grammatically correct too, but that doesn't mean it makes any sense.~~

The point is that yeah, by that point PX had already dropped the Serela shenans. Could you explain how PX voting Shadoweh and NNR would make you feel like you couldn't dismiss his early push on Serela? That's the part I don't understand.

More importantly, why/how do you expect people to have serious/non-bandwagony reasons for voting right at the start of the game? In other situations it would be scummy, but in context...>_>

Polaris · « **Reply #68 on:** October 19, 2012, 03:53:39 AM »

PX forgetting about voting Shadoweh would imply that he wasn't taking his Serela thing seriously, which I realize now contradicts my thought that he was taking it pointlessly seriously. He wasn't actually pushing Serela, but it looked like he was inviting everyone to bandwagon Serela for whatever reason which I guess was odd. I don't really care about not having serious business reasons to vote since it's early Day 1, but bandwagoning without reasons is what I don't like, since it's as if they just want an opportunity to vote without trying to start discussion or something. Like, earlier, Affinity bandwagoned onto Shadoweh for the sake of bandwagoning, and it was stupid.

Should focus on finding scum instead of wasting time on bandwagoning theory, but I have other work to focus on so I'll get back to mafia tomorrow.
For now, PX is silly, Raikaria is weird, IHNN is weird, Dormio is mean, Conq is gut. See you all tomorrow :V

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #69 on:** October 19, 2012, 04:14:42 AM »

(3) Raikaria - WHMZakeri, Affinity, Hero999
(2) PX - Serela, Polaris
(1) Conqueror - NekoNekoRex
(1) Hero999 - Dormio
(1) I have no name - Shadoweh
(1) NekoNekoRex - PX
(1) Polaris - Conqueror
(1) Serela - Raikaria
(1) Shadoweh - I have no name
Not Voting (0): None!

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to hammer. You have about 43 hours left in the day.

Serela · « **Reply #70 on:** October 19, 2012, 04:40:44 AM »

67 hours? I thought we had 48 hour days.

##Vote:Zakeri

So we can get even closer to just having ONE VOTE ON EVERYONE.

...in a more serious manner, while it's good and all that we jumped into logic right away, it also generates more ~*~almost entirely useless noise~*~ then anything, so don't expect me back in the immediate future, I'll make a real post later.

(If anyone seriously wants me to elaborate on that, it's ALSO entirely pointless apart from maybe making sure I actually have a reason instead of an excuse, but sure whatever, also later.)

Shadoweh · « **Reply #71 on:** October 19, 2012, 05:48:24 AM »

Serela get your PRETTY BEHIND back here and vote for IHNN or I will spank you mercilessly.

WHMZakeri · « **Reply #72 on:** October 19, 2012, 07:00:49 AM »

But Shadoweh, Nameless is obviously just Youmoe.
It's not his fault he's too soft.

Raikaria · « **Reply #73 on:** October 19, 2012, 08:30:29 AM »

Wait, I'm getting voted for just pointing out that the order of my posts means that I was not bandwagoning like Polaris suggested. You know, pointing out somnething wrong that if I didn't point out might be erroneously used against me later and I forget why it's wrong?

Also how was anything I've posted anywhere anywhere that fits these:

Quote from: Hero999 on October 19, 2012, 02:09:36 AM

##Unvote
##Vote Raikaria
Sheeting Affinity as well as emotions getting in the way, posting by iPad too hard.
Ignoring current ongoing topic because wifom to hell.
Affinity has the most reasonable post as of the moment.

I don't even know what you mean by Sheeting. Also where are any emotions in my posts except the intended jokey 'Glorious Leader' one? By the way, I don't even have an iPad.

How am I ignoring the current topic when I'm responding to someone's erroneous statement? In fact, how is there even a serious topic during RVS? How is that wifom?

I've not spoken to Affinity at all. How can I be 'sheeting' him?

Incorrect opportunistic reasons for voting, and since this an an attempt to legitimate reasons, it's not just RVS.

Given that you're the first person I have anything actually against this game:

##Vote Hero999

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #74 on:** October 19, 2012, 08:48:46 AM »

I don't think Raikaria quite understands Hero's post. :derp:

Affinity · « **Reply #75 on:** October 19, 2012, 08:52:46 AM »

@Ralkaria: Hero meant sheeping, as in voting you for my reasons.

What do you think about the px fiasco in general?

WHMZakeri · « **Reply #76 on:** October 19, 2012, 10:59:25 AM »

I was about to say that Raikaria is too adorable to vote anymore, and switch to Shadoweh, but then I read back and now it seems like the Ragepost at Hero might be an excuse to ignore Affinity.

Raikaria · « **Reply #77 on:** October 19, 2012, 12:09:37 PM »

Quote from: Affinity on October 19, 2012, 08:52:46 AM

@Ralkaria: Hero meant sheeping, as in voting you for my reasons.

What do you think about the px fiasco in general?

Oh.

Sheeting is Sheeping.

IGNORE ME and my prior post! I'm an imbecile and thought Hero was attacking me, like last game where we butted heads.

##Unvote

Raikaria · « **Reply #78 on:** October 19, 2012, 12:10:30 PM »

As for the PX thing which I forgot to adress above? I just found him funny. It's RVS Shenanigans. It doesn't count for anything.

Hero999 · « **Reply #79 on:** October 19, 2012, 01:51:11 PM »

Quote from: Raikaria on October 19, 2012, 12:09:37 PM

Oh.
Sheeting is Sheeping.
IGNORE ME and my prior post! I'm an imbecile and thought Hero was attacking me, like last game where we butted heads.
##Unvote

See >emotions :V
@Shadoweh: Emotions from last game didn't completely disappear yetz :V
On another note looking back at my post I realized it looked misleading considering my typo. Sorry for that.

On the early topic of PX's logic of either bandwagoning one person or jump someone else within reason, otherwise scum theory. I feel that it was very constrictive and not exactly fitting of either side. So I consider it a null-tell. However, I can see how it helped town as it
1) Led to the end of RVS.
And if we go with the basic >scum don't want attentions, PX is doing a great job of grabbing attention.

NekoNekoRex · « **Reply #80 on:** October 19, 2012, 01:56:03 PM »

I'm just going to drop PX on account he's RVS posting to get out of RVS. Clever.

##Unvote
##Vote: Affinity

I don't really like the idea that the first reaction to PX making a wagon is "try to make an opposing wagon" on RVS shenanigans that are going to dissipate within the next few pages anyway.

noname's post makes me frown
votes on raikaria make me frown too, I guess
like conq's posts. Then again I always like conq's posts.

Players still seem in a jumble over RVS as a whole so it'll still be a bit before any of my votes mean very much.

NekoNekoRex · « **Reply #81 on:** October 19, 2012, 08:07:33 PM »

Gee, it sure is boring around here

Shadoweh · « **Reply #82 on:** October 19, 2012, 08:57:47 PM »

Quote from: WHMZakeri on October 19, 2012, 07:00:49 AM

But Shadoweh, Nameless is obviously just Youmoe.
It's not his fault he's too soft.

Do I have to remind you that Youmu was scum? She even broke your heart. I don't remember who Youmu was but they were surely a terrible criminal mastermind.

We are fishing for the dreaded no names today, he seems to have forgotten to be in a mafia and get lynched. Get back here and get owned pretty boy, I'm waiting for someone relevant from you beyond 'oh you're right that was a bad post plz lynch me now'

Quote from: Raikaria on October 19, 2012, 08:30:29 AM

Wait, I'm getting voted for just pointing out that the order of my posts means that I was not bandwagoning like Polaris suggested. You know, pointing out somnething wrong that if I didn't point out might be erroneously used against me later and I forget why it's wrong?
....
Incorrect opportunistic reasons for voting, and since this an an attempt to legitimate reasons, it's not just RVS.

This entire post is overdefensive and bad. The part where it's all okay since Hero isn't attacking him (but he is) is hilariously bad too. Let's be buddies Hero! <^____^>

Affinity · « **Reply #83 on:** October 19, 2012, 11:16:05 PM »

@Raikaria: In that case, why didn't you take any issue with that facet of Polaris' post, which you should have disagreed with by all accounts?

@NNR: I've changed my vote. How is my Shadoweh vote still relevant to the game?

Uhh... Zakeri, Nameless, Dormio and Serela all seem entirely forgettable. Hope the game doesn't inch forward day by day like this in a game with like... 48-hour days.

I have no name · « **Reply #84 on:** October 19, 2012, 11:20:03 PM »

Quote from: Shadoweh on October 19, 2012, 08:57:47 PM

he seems to have forgotten to be in a mafia

I was at work for the past 5 hours. I have a life.
I may actually end up having to replace out, my free time literally just got more than halved.

PX · « **Reply #85 on:** October 19, 2012, 11:20:22 PM »

Quote from: NekoNekoRex on October 19, 2012, 02:32:56 AM

You're forcing the players to take a side on a player who has done fuck-all this game so far.

I felt entitled to one silly post at the start of the game, as should everyone. That isn't exactly a heinous crime in my books, or worth voting for that matter. I'm not prolonging RVS as much as you're essentially forcing it to end anyway.

No you're not. You're entitled to be accountable for every single one of your posts. You wanting to just post for the sake of posting and saying "it's RVS, you can't hold it against me" is an anti-town stance, as you're not taking seriously and not trying to find scum.

Quote

I'm just going to drop PX on account he's RVS posting to get out of RVS. Clever.

What now? Stop putting words on mouth, I never said it was RVS posting. You're still trying to get others to dismiss your posts under RVS, and that is not something I like.

Quote

Players still seem in a jumble over RVS as a whole so it'll still be a bit before any of my votes mean very much.

Stop with the RVS shit, start finding scum, you scum. Can we lynch already?

Quote from: Polaris on October 19, 2012, 03:53:39 AM

PX forgetting about voting Shadoweh would imply that he wasn't taking his Serela thing seriously, which I realize now contradicts my thought that he was taking it pointlessly seriously. He wasn't actually pushing Serela, but it looked like he was inviting everyone to bandwagon Serela for whatever reason which I guess was odd. I don't really care about not having serious business reasons to vote since it's early Day 1, but bandwagoning without reasons is what I don't like, since it's as if they just want an opportunity to vote without trying to start discussion or something. Like, earlier, Affinity bandwagoned onto Shadoweh for the sake of bandwagoning, and it was stupid.

Should focus on finding scum instead of wasting time on bandwagoning theory, but I have other work to focus on so I'll get back to mafia tomorrow.
For now, PX is silly, Raikaria is weird, IHNN is weird, Dormio is mean, Conq is gut. See you all tomorrow :V

マジだよ
I was completely seriously the entire game. I simply chose Serela because he's most likely to be a liability for LyLo, he's polarizing, and it doesn't take much convincing for people to jump on him. If people bandwagon'd without reasons, then call them out as scum for it instead of telling people to go around voting everyone. I'd rather have everyone voting two people than what the last votecount showed, everybody in a giant circle which provides little. With bandwagons, you can analyze wagon positions and reasons why people are voting.

Quote

67 hours? I thought we had 48 hour days.

##Vote:Zakeri

So we can get even closer to just having ONE VOTE ON EVERYONE.

...in a more serious manner, while it's good and all that we jumped into logic right away, it also generates more ~*~almost entirely useless noise~*~ then anything, so don't expect me back in the immediate future, I'll make a real post later.

(If anyone seriously wants me to elaborate on that, it's ALSO entirely pointless apart from maybe making sure I actually have a reason instead of an excuse, but sure whatever, also later.)

Serela, are you scum? Cereal.

Quote from: Raikaria on October 19, 2012, 12:10:30 PM

As for the PX thing which I forgot to adress above? I just found him funny. It's RVS Shenanigans. It doesn't count for anything.

I don't like you either.

Unvote
Vote NekoNekoRex

(Yes, I know I'm voting the same person)

Polaris · « **Reply #86 on:** October 19, 2012, 11:40:09 PM »

##Unvote
##Vote NekoNekoRex

I can actually get around the idea of lynching NNR today. The Affinity vote looks like it came out of nowhere and I don't understand why he needed to "drop PX" when he was holding onto a jokevote on Conq the whole time.
Not as convinced that PX is scum, though it's not like he's super town. Still keeping an eye on him.
Raikaria is still weird, but I still need to figure out if his weirdness is scummy. I'm open to lynching him if it comes to that, but for now I'll keep an eye on him.
I have a feeling that there is at least one scum in the four names Affinity listed as forgettable. Keeping an eye on them.
Keeping an eye on Conq for reasons of the gut variety, seeing as he hasn't said anything that would change my mind. Conq, if you aren't scum, you should do something cool!

Everyone else (which I notice now is only, like, 4 people not counting me) is cool and does not need to be lynched.

I have no name · « **Reply #87 on:** October 19, 2012, 11:47:11 PM »

Quote from: I have no name on October 19, 2012, 11:20:03 PM

I was at work for the past 5 hours. I have a life.
I may actually end up having to replace out, my free time literally just got more than halved.

Yeah, I'd like to request a replacement actually (don't worry I still have time to run a queue just not time for a game right now)

WHMZakeri · « **Reply #88 on:** October 20, 2012, 01:47:16 AM »

Quote

Do I have to remind you that Youmu was scum? She even broke your heart. I don't remember who Youmu was but they were surely a terrible criminal mastermind.

My love for Youmu has been cast and reforged by Youkai.
The things my love for Youmu cannot cut are next to none.

That said, is there actually a reason you think he could be scum other than just apologizing for being trapped in another dimension and somehow managing to post his response in this thread instead?

Quote from: NekoNekoRex

I don't really like the idea that the first reaction to PX making a wagon is "try to make an opposing wagon" on RVS shenanigans that are going to dissipate within the next few pages anyway.

Do you think Affinity might be scum for taking PX's line of logic and taking it to the Next Logical step?
Or do you just personally not enjoy it?

Also, I'm desperately hoping Serela comes back with an explanation for his vote. I didn't like it before, but I kind of feel like an idiot that it took until PX's post to realize that it was the fact that's he's purposely voting to expand the list rather than to do anything useful with the current wagons. Even if it was a joke, Serela's wasting a heck of a lot of time here.

Serela · « **Reply #89 on:** October 20, 2012, 02:35:26 AM »

almost nothing happened in the past 24 hours

I expected to get voted (I was kind of aiming for something sort of related to that? No I don't mean I made a dumb post to try and "trap" someone) but then it never happened. And not much else did either. Especially considering that it's mid-d1, where the game... should be a lot more active then this.

I'm trying to see anything that I can actually think looks scummy in a serious manner at all :T Rereading over stuff a couple times because the first time didn't get anywhere.