Current reread says I don't find huh what's play suspicious when compared to past games. Maybe I would have more confidence in this if I were ever able to read huh what correctly.. but he's definitely not afraid of bussing Serela, and I feel he hasn't been as emotional this game as he usually gets as scum. Three suspects.. Rereading has remindded me that KilgaTown likes applying the vote to the Shadoweh. It's kind of surreal to read you being the one telling me how insulting it is to suspect you killed Pesco. asfhdggs. If one of you is scum I don't feel like I can figure it out yet.
I may be generically high on your list from game-to-game, but I don't think there's any question that Pesco came out of Day 1 townier than I did.
Can you please explain this to me so I can understand it. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY HE IS DEAD. You can accuse me of lying about my scum meta but it's not like I can erase past games. All you need to do to see it is look. (this is clearly vampiric hypnotism at work, OOoOOoOOooo read my past gaaaAaAaaammesss)
See, the thing is that I can't really tell the difference, precisely because of the lack of accompanying "why".
If I knew why something was weird at the time it wouldn't be weird. Mafia is still a team game. If I can't understand something, there's a chance someone else will havve an idea of what's bugging me about something if I hold it out. It's nice to have reminders for myself, but if I'm posting it it's because I want to see what people's opinions of someething are.
This is me acknowledging that colors are semantics and we just seem to think differently about them.
Re: Why not obvtown; I was more interested in the activity part then asking why game-state wise you wouldn't be. Not posting doesn't excuse an inactive vote, but there wasn't really any time you could have put the vote on Serela (I checked this time).
Part 2
You're not gonna get to me with that AtE, missy. :V I'm not a huge fan of this, any way I read it sounds more like excuse-making for the lackluster Affinity case than anything else. Please do at least realize how incongruous the strengths of your Day 1 and Day 2 cases are. (For the record, I do at least not blame anyone for wanting to get NKed, since I find myself praying for it more often than not regardless of the circumstances. >_>)
I'm aware there was a difference in strength, but that's to be expected when the first subject is relatively obvious scum and the second one was a townie, making any points against him wrong in the end. It wasn't as strong because I wasn't as confident, it's as simple as that. (I like being alive, usually. It's just a matter of pride.)
Scum don't always think about that sort of thing. I remember watching you doing highlighted wagon analysis on Day 3 of Swords Girls Mafia and thinking "y'know, maybe we should have paid closer attention to the wagons when deciding who to kill and who to suspect." (For all that none of our kills were in our control in that game, anyway.) This is also at least part of the reason why I am surprised your vote is not on BT, because your opinion of his vote seems a lot less positive now.
Scum not thinking about it is a point. The only thing keeping me from BT at the moment is remembering Serela's semi-defense of him combined with exploring how possible you and huh what being partners is. (as in rereading you both equally) I don't think I ever expressed a positive opinion of BT's vote.
Again with the lack of addressing the "why"s. I'm not going to speak for the dead rabbit but I at least tried to put forward my rationale on why the counterclaim was a bad idea, which you either didn't notice or did and didn't care. You could very well have discussed why my rationale was good or bad while still not having any reason to think Pesco or myself town. Not doing so and simply blowing us off in this fashion instead was not a townie approach to the situation.
Perhaps if I outline my thinking at the time it'll be clearer. I did not want a counterclaim either. I was exploring why Serela's behaviour was scummy due to the fact that a cop in an open setup should consider themselves confirmed town because of how counterclaiming works, and Serela was acting the opposite of confirmed town. Pesco took that as a reason to attack me mistaking my intentions as stating that the cop should claim. Since that's not what I was arguing at all, I took it as a strawmanning push and your name just being used to support an attack on me. Your rationale from a theory standpoint could be argued either way. I didn't care because I wasn't trying to argue against you.
- Considering my opinion on all Serela had said about Omba, I was at least inclined to agree with the sentiment that it was unjustified, because I, uh, hadn't found justification.
This sounds like you just agreed because you agreed Omba was scummy, without looking at the case in detail. Is this correct?
- Why did you not bring this assessment of the best Serela approach up at the time?
Because at the time I didn't read it in detail either. At a glance I already disagreed with the premise of all the cases on Omba, reading further into them wasn't going to convince me otherwise compared to the proof I felt I had from Serela himself.
Your third point is more a complaint of my playstyle again. Perhaps you're right, but I did try to engage you at the time with the proof I had. Your responses to me are filled with as much AtE as anything I've done.
This implies you were doing it thinking that my "likely" response to it would be to come out blasting you the next day despite the fact that my most recent stated opinion of you was that you were probably town due to the D1 wagon. I think it's entirely possible Scum Shadoweh tried messing with my head while I was obviously frustrated from my pride-and-joy case being blown up by a role claim, yes, because muddying my perception of the game would be good for a scum who has stated she holds my townie game in high regard. That it blew up in said scum's face was simply an unexpected result.
You seem to think that's what I wanted out of you? Your continuous opinion of me has been to question my every move. I can't see how it would be more beneficial if I were scum to talk to you instead of ignoring you until the night phase. You know what's more effective against someone who's townie game you hold in high regard then messing with their head? Bullets!
There is a huge problem for me right now. BT/PX doesn't make much sense. They've been infighting since Day 2. I don't think stop drop and bus is a good scum strategy immediately after a scum lynch. One of you two bastards is scum. And one of them is likely scum. Aaaaaaaaa. 48 hour days are horrible.
At the moment I support either lynch, but Kilga is correct, I haven't seen anything from BT to refute my points. This feels kind of like BR vs Kaori, both of them are fairly absent lurkers. My hammer the PX urges are rising again though so he better post something good or I will quickwagon him off the planet again.
##Vote: BT :trollface:
