BT, you forgot to unvote.
I want to vig PX for ignoring
my #126 then switching to Dan while ignoring everything else that has gone on.
PX: ...stop ignoring everything please! I also want to vig Serela for making no sense and Hero for doing nothing and Rawr for doing even less and Maav for voting me on ~PoV arguments~ and... well, actually, I suddenly feel tempted to shoot myself.
I have not really been able to get behind the cases on Schezo or Dan - it seems to me that Schezo's Dan vote was reactive, and I felt that Schezo's PX case was never weaker than his Dan case despite having fewer words since it had a single point that I regarded as particularly strong for that point in the day. Dan's "inconsistency" about earlygame rolefishing doesn't look scummy to me because it's reasonable to believe his thought processes evolved and became more lenient as more information was introduced. Affinity raises an eyebrow for trying to dismiss the people outside of Dan/PX/Dormio/Schezo in his
#117. Since he directed Bard toward those four, I'd like him to talk about people aside from them to be fair, as well as explain why he seems to think people should have been primarily focussing on the quadrangle he mentioned at the time. It should be noted that Dan wasn't actually a target as the time of Bard's post.
Hero is scummy because going by his
#133, his Shadoweh attack looks like a disagreement with her and there's no reason for him to be voting her over anybody else who has taken a stance of multiple lynches, such as myself. There's no real conclusions in his post either, it's all speculation with nothing definite. It's not natural that he went out of his way to disagree with Maav's vote on me then went attack Shadoweh over reasons that seem to be of the same ilk as Maav's. I'm considering it as possible buddying.
##Unvote##Vote Hero999Hero's scumminess looks more solid to me than my interpretation of Bard's earlier post, however, I still think Bard's D1 approach was scummy though even if his words appeared to be reasonable on the surface. Even considering time zones, it doesn't sit right with me that the last vote he made before leaving was more of a prod vote than anything else, so I'd like him to post some more content. Notably,
Bard, how have your opinions changed on Shadoweh over the course of the recent pages?Serela's PoE is poorly thought out because he automatically discluded the less vocal players, which leaves him with a huge blindspot against lurkscum. Serela, how do you feel about the people who are posting less, like Affinity? Is there a reason you believe that scum is among the more active players? Also, if Maav's vote on me is "scummy" even if you don't believe in voting on it, what does that make Hero's Shadoweh vote?
