Oh. I found the words that YJ's post reminded me of.
Hw's
#33 is where I was going to start anyway with why I didn't like HW this game. Hw's insistence that Dormio was twisting a RNG RVS vote into a scum tell strikes me as opportunistic, especially after claiming that Dormio's could be "the first serious vote scum would make," even though it was the first serious vote anyway, and paves the way for HW's own, 2nd, serious vote. Although HW grouped me and Dormio as having the same quality of vote, it manifestly obvious that my post was not just "I agree with Dormio," but "I agree with Dormio, but moreover blah blah blah..."
Considering HW announced their were additional reasons to dislike Chaore's RNG RVS votepost, I don't understand why HW choose not to comment on my own additional reason and was content to group me with Dormio.
HW's
#53 agrees with the case on Chaore, and quite strongly, judging from " This is not townie usage of one's vote!" but holds back due to wanting more info from Dormio.
Hw had a stronger case on Chaore, as evidenced by the justification for retaining the vote on Dormio, because Dormio's vote "still rubs him the wrong way" which is not an adequate reason to keep the vote on Dormio.
HW's
#84 undercuts his reason for suspicion of Dormio with this "People are suddenly throwing around accusations of tryhard a lot, which I think is silly, because now it's just being used as a buzzword. Trying too hard by itself isn't a scumtell, unless you can back it up by saying why you think the manner in which the player is "trying too hard" is scum-intended. People don't seem to actually be doing this." But at this point I don't see how HW isn't doing the same thing. Dormio trying hard to twist Chaore's RVS RNG vote into a scumtell is HW's entire case, and it's flimsy. This looks like self-advertizing of your own case while trying to discredit others.
HW's
#98 makes sense for the first paragraph, but the 2nd is simply circumstantial evidence which attempts to link up to his previous reason for voting Dormio. I don't particularly care for Dormios scumhunting abilities, but Dormio seems stuck in his ways in such a manner that I simply don't consider scummy. I don't see why Dormio need mention Chaore when others are clearly more of a priority for Dormio. It's not like Dormios first vote constituted a hard scum-tell like huhwhat insinuates. It's not HW can't change his vote on a time either, considering he was content to vote YJ and was free to give opinions on others in #128 without needing to say why his joke was on YJ intead of Dormio besides "I'm more interested in YJ".
HW's #137 makes sense... but HW doesn't vote Dormio until #139 for a throwaway line which could have come from town or scum.
Basically I'm inclined to believe both votes, the one on Dormio and the one on YJ were vote parks. I read you as scummier than Shadoweh but less scummy than Polly.
I'll need to reread Serela, because earlier I didn't like her posts, but recently my gut only doesn't like how unnecessarily verbose they were.
