Author Topic: Graveyard Anonymafia - Game Over  (Read 54715 times)

Skull

  • Skull
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #720 on: August 25, 2011, 01:48:58 AM »
Forget the haters, Remilia, you were awesome yesterday
Munak, could you please claim for the thread?

DiEnd

  • DiEnd
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #721 on: August 25, 2011, 02:32:06 AM »
Don't give me that. >_> Even if the target was right it was an awful way to go about it. It's always suspicious when someone's okay with hammering without a claim.. or input from the rest of anyone. It was rushed and killed discussion way too early. I know it seems like arguing semantics at this point but it's at least something she should know not to do.

Skull

  • Skull
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #722 on: August 25, 2011, 03:28:33 AM »
She was just excited to catch her first scum without actually having to just bandwagon.
Plus she ended up turning Bogmire from the proposed mislynch to the nightkill.
I think she deserves some positive reinforcement even if she made a few minor mistakes.

DiEnd

  • DiEnd
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #723 on: August 25, 2011, 03:40:31 AM »
I think this conversation should be left til post game. Suffice it to say I don't feel that the correct aspects of her play will be reinforced by congratulating her. But maybe I'm just curmudgeonly. Either way, it's irrelevant.

A Munak claim would be pretty nice, yes.

Skull

  • Skull
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #724 on: August 25, 2011, 05:05:59 AM »
I don't really see how congratulating her would reinforce the quickhammering, since it's already been made clear that this was a mistake. I figured it would help encourage her to keep scumhunting, whereas negative reinforcement would have just made her feel like there's no point to scumhunting.

...Munak sure needs to come and give us something else to talk about. :derp:

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #725 on: August 25, 2011, 05:49:16 AM »
Um... for me I hammered at 12:00-12:30AM. Timezones are a bitch.
I was waiting for you guys but even if you were making a post you should just make a quick one asking me to wait.
I gave you guys at least an hour of warning.

Thank you Pamela for being nice :)

And just double checking, how long till LYLO now (including NK's)?

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #726 on: August 25, 2011, 05:52:29 AM »
Oh and I wasn't going to be around for much longer after 12:00-12:30AM because I was going to go to sleep and I didn't want a no lynch again.

OOO

  • Taka! Kujaku! Condor!
  • TaJaDor
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #727 on: August 25, 2011, 06:15:19 AM »
Master, why do you look at me like that? Don't you want me anymore, master?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Munak's master is not strong enough yet to augment Munak's power to anything above that of a Vanilla Townie.

Munak is making another post.

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #728 on: August 25, 2011, 06:23:21 AM »
I tried what Pamlea said to do yesterday on Munak. So far it's not looking that good and I'm only up to D3.
Munak has done some huge tunneling  on Youmu, Bathory and Pamela. I would like to know why. As generally the only other people you mentioned were ones that were candidates for lynch that same day.
Her opinions don't look all that real either.
I think Munak is a very cunning scum who was disguised by potentially confusing post layouts and a townie veil.

I can put Munak at L-1 if you guys want.

Also Munak, I would like a claim too please.

Skull

  • Skull
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #729 on: August 25, 2011, 06:44:52 AM »
I had a quicktopic yesterday with Munak, which I continued with today.
She thought Remilia was scummy, and she waffled on Shoe.
I asked if she wanted to dump some leftover reads in the quicktopic I could reference, but she refused saying she'd rather just make a new post in the thread.
The QT is suppose to have a relaxing, but loud atmosphere.
I should have hit up Sid, at least he might have had something new to say.
I'm lonely ;_;

@Remi: we have more than enough votes to put on Munak. in fact, I'm surprized Kukaku hasn't dropped by yet. Let's wait and see what she wants to say first.

Kabuto

  • Kabuto
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #730 on: August 25, 2011, 06:48:44 AM »
##Vote: Munak
##Unvote

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #731 on: August 25, 2011, 06:52:09 AM »
Don't worry Pamela, I'll be here for you :) (note: this is not buddying, just being nice and friendly). Make a QT with me and we can have some fun because I'll be there and I would try to post as much as I can.
Also I'll wait to vote then.
Cut by Kukaku being the usual troll.

OOO

  • Taka! Kujaku! Condor!
  • TaJaDor
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #732 on: August 25, 2011, 07:02:55 AM »
I asked if she wanted to dump some leftover reads in the quicktopic I could reference, but she refused saying she'd rather just make a new post in the thread.
You asked me to post my reads in the QT, I planned on doing that in topic, so I see no reason to post them explicitly in the QT.
To be honest, I don't really get the point of the QT at all.
I mean, I don't know whether or not you're scum, and anything that gets said in there between you and I would be much better placed out in the open.

Also Munak, I would like a claim too please.
I said it already, Vanilla Town.

I waffled on Shoe, yep.
I did not reread him and believed Bogmire to be scum.

Munak has done some huge tunneling  on Youmu, Bathory and Pamela. I would like to know why.
Uh, because I wanted them lynched?

Making another post.

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #733 on: August 25, 2011, 07:06:25 AM »
I said it already, Vanilla Town.
Uh, because I wanted them lynched?
:facepalm: I can't read.
You can still wan't them lynched, that's fine for me. But you could've said more about everyone else. There was only a sliver of non-tunneling from you every 5 or more posts, and that is a very bad thing.

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #734 on: August 25, 2011, 07:07:28 AM »
EBWOP:Lol at the apostrophe in "wan't". Obviously meant to say "want"

Skull

  • Skull
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #735 on: August 25, 2011, 07:23:27 AM »
what am I gonna do, lie about what you say?
besides, you could always post gut feelings, random thoughts on the game, or other stuff that you don't feel directly contributes to the game. I'm going to have to release all of my quicktopics in the game so people and see how a town/town QT differs from a Town/Scum QT.

OOO

  • Taka! Kujaku! Condor!
  • TaJaDor
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #736 on: August 25, 2011, 07:46:35 AM »
what am I gonna do, lie about what you say?
Sure, why not?

Anyway, let's do this, Remilia or Pamela is scum.

Making another post.

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #737 on: August 25, 2011, 08:05:09 AM »
Pamela release the QT's if you can.
Also I reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaalllyyyy want to vote Munak.

OOO

  • Taka! Kujaku! Condor!
  • TaJaDor
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #738 on: August 25, 2011, 08:07:23 AM »
I'd prefer it if you didn't, but if you're going to, wait until I get to say the stuff I want to say first. :/

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #739 on: August 25, 2011, 08:08:57 AM »
Fine, I'll wait.

Skull

  • Skull
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #740 on: August 25, 2011, 08:16:28 AM »
I can't yet, the game's still going.
Also, I would never, ever lie about what's being said in the quicktopic.
It would be too easy to trace it back to me.

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #741 on: August 25, 2011, 08:28:00 AM »
D:
Also, lol.

OOO

  • Taka! Kujaku! Condor!
  • TaJaDor
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #742 on: August 25, 2011, 08:59:42 AM »
Anyway, Remilia.

http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg692393.html#msg692393
Waffle on Necro. No vote on Ayumu.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg692410.html#msg692410
Wants person she thinks is scummiest to make themselves look better?
Uh huh. And if Ayumu were to look better, your vote would have gone... where?
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg692421.html#msg692421
What the hell is the first part of this even supposed to be?
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg692859.html#msg692859
Uh, okay, you suspect Necro because... early game stuff and now he looks better but he's still the second scummiest to you?
Also, slow response = possibly stalling to you. Okay.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg692868.html#msg692868
Nice parrot and fencesit.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg693451.html#msg693451
And suddenly, suspicion of Pamela.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg693455.html#msg693455
Nice parrot.

I like you only went for people after other people had already voiced their suspicion of them.
And even then, you didn't add any of your own opinions, you were content to simply parrot and chase bandwagons.
You did not mention anyone outside of people that other people were voicing suspicion of.

http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg694358.html#msg694358
Again, I like how you call someone out for tunneling, miss "I only look at whoever has a lot of suspicion on them already".
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg694451.html#msg694451
That post is all kinds of weird to me.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg696127.html#msg696127
Suddenly, the Pamela case has been dropped completely because Pamela posts a bit more.
Forget about everything else I parroted, I wasn't really paying attention, anyway, Pamela is totally town for posting as much as any other person, right?
People are getting suspicious of Kukaku Shiba! Must jump onto the wagon!
Original case? Psh. Let's just copy what other people had to say.
Continued fencesitting on Necro.
Bathory seems suspicious. No reasons given. Also the first time to mention Bathory, and only after I had raised my own suspicions about Bathory.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg696134.html#msg696134
Admitting to parrotting the case on Kukaku?
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg696216.html#msg696216
Huh, where did that stuff on Youmu come from? Also, uh, doesn't "Possibly scum" sound scummier than "Neutral leaning scum"?
It sounds like you thought that Youmu was scummier than Kukaku. Why keep your vote on Kukaku?

Great contributions, no?

http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg697145.html#msg697145
Whee, parrot.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg697170.html#msg697170
Does Remirya want a cracker?
Also, that question at the end could have easily been resolved by yourself if you read through the topic again.
Why did you feel the need to bring that up, anyway? Needed confirmation before you added it to your borrowed case?
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg697226.html#msg697226
Whee wagon hops.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg697835.html#msg697835
Fence sitting?

The rest of Day 3 is pretty much poking Kukaku for answers and a post trying to decipher Count's haiku.

http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg699351.html#msg699351
Where did Bogmire scum come from, anyway?
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg699387.html#msg699387
Whee, that's a lot of AtE.
http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,10467.msg699453.html#msg699453
More AtE.

Day 4 and 5 really don't have much.

Making more posts.

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #743 on: August 25, 2011, 09:28:17 AM »
1.Wants person she thinks is scummiest to make themselves look better?
Uh huh. And if Ayumu were to look better, your vote would have gone... where?
2.Uh, okay, you suspect Necro because... early game stuff and now he looks better but he's still the second scummiest to you?
3.I like you only went for people after other people had already voiced their suspicion of them.
And even then, you didn't add any of your own opinions, you were content to simply parrot and chase bandwagons.
You did not mention anyone outside of people that other people were voicing suspicion of.
4.Again, I like how you call someone out for tunneling, miss "I only look at whoever has a lot of suspicion on them already".
5.Suddenly, the Pamela case has been dropped completely because Pamela posts a bit more.
6.Bathory seems suspicious. No reasons given. Also the first time to mention Bathory, and only after I had raised my own suspicions about Bathory.
7.Huh, where did that stuff on Youmu come from? Also, uh, doesn't "Possibly scum" sound scummier than "Neutral leaning scum"?
It sounds like you thought that Youmu was scummier than Kukaku. Why keep your vote on Kukaku?
8.Where did Bogmire scum come from, anyway?
1. I was saying that if Ayumu didn't make themselves look better, then I would keep my vote on him. If he did look better then I don't know where it would've gone.
2. I couldn't find anyone else that scummy at the time.
3. I have a tendency to rely on other people to take the initiative. It comes with newb status.
4. I have mentioned other people many times before. Whereas you haven't done it much at all.
5. I dropped the case because I thought Pamela's posts were much better.
6. I completely forgot about Bathory before that. As she was lurking so bad. And that was around the time she started looking bad.
7. Possibly scum meant that I thought they were town but there was a veeeeeeerrrrrrryyyyyy slight chance they could be scum (in some cases, more of a chance).
8. That was around the time that I realised how bad Bogmire was.

OOO

  • Taka! Kujaku! Condor!
  • TaJaDor
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #744 on: August 25, 2011, 11:33:55 AM »
And Pamela.

Too lazy to link everything again.
Pamela's D1 involved her lurking, and hopping onto Ayumu's wagon when the day was nearing its end.
On D2, Pamela misrepped Necro.
Pamela says that she dropped her case on Youmu when D2 started, and Pamela's D1 post was pretty late into the day. What changed there anyway?
Pamela was also cheerleading the Kukaku Shiba wagon, which I really don't like.
Also, I find this post to be really weird.

Making another post.

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #745 on: August 25, 2011, 11:43:33 AM »
It looks like you had many more reasons to go after me instead of Pamela. So why not go after me earlier? The amount of bad things for me was so much greater than Pamela's.

DiEnd

  • DiEnd
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #746 on: August 25, 2011, 11:46:15 AM »
Remilia: When I say you cut me with a hammer, I literally mean I was frantically typing GOD NO STOP as you were fixing your vote. Then Edible was Not Amused (tm) and shut down the topic. Normally I'm still asleep at that hour too, my sense of dramatic irony woke me up. I mentioned this before Remilia, but instead of just saying you realized someone looked bad, point us to the post that made you realize how good/bad someone looked and explain to us why it did that, it'll make it easier to understand you.

Pamela: :< That's what happens when you interface with a jerk.

Munak: She can't lie about what you say in the QT. (and she would have done it by now to us if she had an agenda). Personally we found it a useful tool and it's not even our power.


Skull

  • Skull
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #747 on: August 25, 2011, 12:00:34 PM »
RE:"Pamela says that she dropped her case on Youmu when D2 started, and Pamela's D1 post was pretty late into the day. What changed there anyway?"
Quicktopic with Youmu.
I'm serious, a T/T QT =! T/S QT. For instance, town don't have any reason to refuse a light banter with another member of the game, but a mafioso might because that would require letting your guard down and making mistakes or showing off you know more. When I spoke with MGG, I was worried because I knew I wasn't stimulating conversation, and I didn't know for certain she was scum until she fakeclaimed. I've given you plenty of time, and plenty of chances to do so, but you don't seem interested for some reason.

RE:"Also, I find this post to be really weird."
I was, in my mind, trying to justify why the Kukaku lynch didn't feel right, and trying to answer the question of why Kukaku would want to sacrifice herself in order to protect someone whom I thought was definite scum at the same time. It turned out that my logic was partially true, too, since Kukaku did end up being a role that subverted death.

@Youmu: I miss you, too~ :<

Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #748 on: August 25, 2011, 12:05:56 PM »
@Youmu:
Oh, sorry then. I probably should've waited a little bit longer then.
Also, what part of them looked bad was all the posts put together when mentioning already dead people. It looked so bad. Especially considering how many posts were for each person. Munak even wrote a post dedicated to Bathory and it consisted of 25 lines I think. Also I only got into D3 and he had only talked bout MGG once. And he didn't talk about Reg Shoe much at all.
@Pamela:
Make a QT with me!! We can have so much fun!! :3

Faiz

  • Faiz
Re: Graveyard Anonymafia - Day 5
« Reply #749 on: August 25, 2011, 12:44:36 PM »
Munak's post really doesn't show much. The fact that he has 2 suspects at this junction with 1 scum left, is...unsettling.

At the moment, I find that theres really nothing else to work with.

Also, I'm going to have to ask again, what were the cases against Youmu and Pamela?
After you have declared it for so much, it pains me to say I do not remember it.