If we also assume Polaris is town, that leaves four.
I really don't get why we should assume Polaris is town. Anyways.
PolarisI might have just been self conscious about sheeping Kilga too much.
Associative reads with Kilga, go. It's not strong, definitely, but scumbuddies would be alert about not shipping their scumbuddies too much. It'd be a problem if their scumbuddy was lynched, and it was D1 so nothing was set yet, not even Kilga's ?towniness?.
Another example of this is how Polaris inmediately changes his vote to Validon D2 after Kilga's post, but then he voteparks for two irl days while saying things about Shadoweh. It'd have been too noticeable that he was just following Kilga's vote.
@Validon: Ok but you better know that we're going to lynch you if you don't start scumhunting at some point 
This plainly looks like a post taken straight from the scum QT. I mean, nobody would tell someone else that they're going to lynch them due to a lack of scumhunting if the time comes they place their vote and that's all. Validon's lack of an answer to this is actually scummy too, overall his attitude this game has been not Validon-ish at all. But I already talked about Validon before.
This is all not that strong, I know. As I said Polaris is the person who I was less certain of being scum. Not anymore, though:
but like mitsuki are you scum? 
because like I seriously don't know how you can just waltz in with scumreads the two people generally accepted as town (kilga and me, sorry for being a pretentious) while simultaneously refusing to consider any of the existing wagons, and adamantly at that. your credibility is decreased because it seems like you haven't really looked at the game properly, which makes me wonder if you're even serious about these cases or if you just made them up because you're trying to look SO HIP and PRO TOWN by challenging a widely held belief.
I'm not going to point out Polaris' contradiction on his opinion on me again. Let's ask a question instead: why does Polaris think that my posts are bad?
- He says that scumreading people generally accepted as town is badWhy? Is the dynamics of a group that has already mislynched twice an example of what I should believe?
- He says I'm refusing to consider the existing wagonsI said so myself and I explained why. My scumreads were too clear to consider lynching someone else.
- He says that I'm not credible enough because it seemed like I hadn't looked at the game properly and that I made up my cases because of thatI had looked at the game properly, but why should I remember everything? It's just generalizing to say that I didn't read the game properly just because of that.
Anyways, how can he go from ?not reading properly? to ?having made up the cases?? I don't get how one thing can be derived from the other, specially when my cases are so damn long and complete.
- He says I'm trying to look hip and pro townPeople who are already hip and pro town don't need to try to look hip and pro town (?wu) Ok, now seriously. Why should his perception of my identity affect how good/bad my cases are?
^ basically my first impressions of mitsuki. not a fan of nitpicky quotestrippy cases either `_`
- He says that he's not a fan of my casesHow is liking a kind of case related to its quality? (And if it comes to this, all I have to say is that I'm not a fan of wrong cases)
It's ok that Mitsuki has unique and interesting opinions but I'm unhappy with her staunch refusal to care about anyone else, which seems unnecessarily stubborn and could border on tunneling. And her cases do give off the impression of tunnel vision and confirmation bias, seeing as her cases are really quotestrippy and it looks like she was selectively reading all the "bad" parts to make a case without looking at a coherent whole, and when it looks like she hasn't read the game properly, it makes it worse. It's how she handled her opinions that are worse than her actual opinions, more than anything.
The part about it being okay to have unique views is a contradiction by itself because he said that it was wrong for me to doubt common townreads. But I'll keep analyzing like before:
- He says that I don't care about anything else and that means I'm tunellingIt's not possible to say from my posts that I don't care about anything else because in fact not wanting to vote townies (who were null reads, but I considered them townies because of my reverse PoE where I guess who the townies are because I have strong opinions on who the scum are) is caring about what happens. Anyways, having 3 scumreads is not tunelling as far as I know, and you can't really say that I haven't considered anybody else based on my posts.
- My cases give the impression of confirmation bias, tunnel vision, are quotestrippy, selectively reading the bad parts without having in mind a ?coherent whole?...There are literally no cited reasons on why he thinks all of that from my cases. If I wanted to, I could say ?hey guys, X is a bitch, sews poorly and she copies all my cosplays!!!?, but if I don't provide evidence it's worth nothing.
Also, quotestrippy cases are the best.
Well I have to undermine her because her cases are dumb.
- He says that the reason he's attacking me is because my cases are dumbWhy should the quality of my cases, when I hadn't already made a case on Polaris, be a matter of concern for him?
Hold on that sentence.
Let's analyze what we have so far: the reasons given to say that my cases aren't valid are that 1- I haven't read properly, the style of my cases is bad, etc / 2- tunnel vision, other biases / 3- My identity is bad
So well, what does this say about how my cases are? Nothing. You could say all of this about anybody else (obviously changing some parts, like ?quotestrippy? to ?quoteless?), it'd contain no actual replies to the cases and it'd make it look like they're terrible.
It made my cases look like shit without actually saying anything about my thoughts.
I checked to see if this was something that Polaris did just to me or if it's something that he's done to more people. Polaris replied to the other cases properly, Polaris-style. I'm not saying that he did perfect, but he certainly had valid (maybe right, maybe wrong) points.
Why did he bother to write all of that, why did he feel the need to do so, if it had very little to do with him? Because I must have been right, at least with one of the two cases, and he suddenly feared losing.
But no, I'm not saying that he did all of this consciously. He clearly wanted my cases to look bad, but he genuinely thought they were bad and that the reasons he gave stood. Scum wouldn't agree just like that about what it's been said about them, it's just a matter of pride. And what do people with hurt pride do, like a girl who fears her friend will get the boy she loves? They baselessy critisize the one who threatens them.
##Unvote##Vote: PolarisNow I think he has more chances to be scum than Validon, the same than Kilga but I'm willling to ignore him for now due to NNR's role.
Actually there are a few things left to say/analyze, but I'm running out of time. I'll think about them later, but this is the most important part!
