ActionDan, if you have time to talk about how you have someone's views about Shadoweh you have time to talk about other things. What do you think of your current vote and the rebuttal to your speculation? Do you have any not-Shadoweh and not-Bard opinions or are your opinions restricted to those two? Are you going to do anything original or just jump onto existing bandwagons?
Both you and Shadoweh are my scum reads and I'm going to be pushing both of you. I am not overly concerned with everyone else. Suffice it to say that I am unimpressed by PX/Dormio/Schezo/Omba and think the NNR and especially the BT wagon are both bad. I have not yet made a judgement on PX but I will vote Shadoweh and You before I ever consider voting PX.
FYI, I was at work or else I would have responded sooner.
Your "rebuttal" is awful. It's literally flailing. Recap:
Your #28 and #29 imply more or less an equality between both me and Dormio for being bad by extending RVS. Your #34 is an addendum on your view of my and Dormio's posts in which you give an additional reason to consider our play scummy: for Dormio, you indirectly accuse him of being scummy by trying to hard to be a townie; for me, you directly accuse me of being scummy by tacitly claiming Scum. For my case, it sounds like you didn't really think about that when you first voted me and it was more a post-thought.
Despite my response that I wasn't trying to imply I was scum, your #66 tries way too hard to fit my actions to those of someone trying to invoke being anti-town to suit your claimed desire to go after anyone claiming or implying to be scum. I highly doubt your intentions because 1) claiming/implying to be scum during RVS is not that big a deal (opinions differ) and much more importantly 2) your #28 and #29 imply your main concern was the extension of RVS, not explicitly on the methods used to do so.
You changed your tune to suit your voting needs and are scummy because of it.
This got lost in everything, but the point about you claiming Scum isn't mine, it's BT's.
This is the extent of your "rebuttal":
1) I credited you your original reason for your vote, namely, "being bad by extending RVS"
2) BT might have jokingly brought it up, you used it unprompted to continue justifying your vote
3) It might as well have been your original reason ---->
And we have only 48 hours to come to a lynch. The faster we abandon joke voting phase the better. There's no added value in accusing people of being Scum over capslock antics, it moreso reeks of trying too hard to fit Ediblah's definition of Townie.
ActionDan tacitly claiming Scum is all the more reason to lynch him.
I just said that "Dan claiming Scum" would be more reason to vote him, not that it was my reason to vote him.
I think you're worse for claiming Mason Lovers after a game where both Masons (lol) and Lovers were Anti-Town aligned. Moreover, it emphasises a bond between Shadoweh and you and it's rather early to be weaving yourself together with someone.
You are clearly saying that I am bad for claiming something that invokes a scum claim.
Read the last two lines of the the 2nd paragraph in my case and tell me how you think you could have possibly have rebuked that with your one-liner response.