Maidens of the Kaleidoscope

~Beyond the Border~ => Rumia's Party Games => Mystia's Stored Games => Topic started by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:10:56 PM

Title: Justice Juice Mafia Thread I (NIGHT 3)
Post by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:10:56 PM
Justice Juice Mafia

(http://static2.businessinsider.com/image/5196803aeab8eaf72f000004-1200/8-a-long-time-ago-in-a-galaxy-far-far-away.jpg)

Ah wait a sec. Having some transmission issues.

(http://www.papamurphys.com/Libraries/Content/MainSalads.sflb.ashx)

That's better.

The fued between the goodies and baddies has already begun. While the main dark pepper fleet is subdued, the forces of good have limited the infiltrators to a pool of 12 talented recruits. Dubious, that. There were supposed to be 13.

...I see. Looks like the supervising team thought it a good idea to make their own judgements already. It's really a good thing we have responsibles around who are good at their jobs. Sarcasm is hard.

The casualty seems to be Raikaria, the rogue volunteer. He was:

Quote
Welcome to Justice Juice Mafia, Raikaria! You're Admiral Apple. You have a thing for oceans. By that I mean you have full control over the water element and species that are closely related to it. Ever seen heroes riding on dolphins to the crime scene? That's you. You went with the flow and decided to help the goodies' endeavor, and so here you are.

Your role is Vanilla Town. It seems to your dismay that the evildoers are waterproof. The best you can do is support your teammates vocally.

You win when all evildoers are eliminated.

He will be missed. Apples are delicious.

With that said, it's your turn. Try solving this yourselves. We all saw how well the other method worked out.

The battle between the Assortment of Fruits and Vegetables (Team Town) and the Coalition of Vegan Villains (Team Scum) has begun! Try your best!


Bog Standard Rules:

1) This is a game of mafia. In games of mafia you point fingers in the game thread and there alone, unless otherwise stated.
2) Each day has one lynch. Vote with ##Vote. Remove votes with ##Unvote. The majority vote gets lynched and flipped, thus ending the day.
3) Each night has one factional kill. The scumteam may choose a target to kill and if the kill is successful the target will be killed and flipped when the night is over.
4) Editing or deleting posts in the thread is banned.
5) Quoting any private communication directly is banned.

Iffy Arguable Rules:

11) Talk is allowed in the thread until (and including) twilight, after a hammer vote was cast. NO talk is allowed during nighttime. Dead people and non-players can post as long as what they say isn't game-related.
12) Days last 72 hours and nights last 24 hours. LYLO/MYLO gets no special deadline extension. No phase gets any special deadline extension. LYLO/MYLO is announced.
13) The scum QT is available at all times. Dead teammates may poke their heads inside but no game-related talk.
14) Whoever sends in the scum nightkill can't use any other action during that night.
15) No Lynch is a legal vote and No Lynch is a legal outcome. No majority means No Lynch. I will not be picky with unvotes so don't expect to win through pedantic stupidity.
16) Don't even think about discussing flavor. It's purposefully nonsensical and you won't find anything there. "Rocky Rock" is a plausible nameclaim as far as you're concerned.
17) When I say "flip" I mean full Role PM. Expect nothing to be ommited aside from the obvious.
18) This game's ~*~thing~*~ is the effort bar. It looks something like this. (this totally isn't recycled, at all) (http://i.imgur.com/EYRbp8p.png) Each 24 hours during the day automatically add 400 words to your personal bar. Each word in a post (I can ignore posts that abuse this) erases a word from the bar. The bar doesn't go negative. If you hit over 800 words, you're replaced. If you hit over 1200 words, you're modkilled. You generally shouldn't be worried about this rule if you plan on playing the game.
19) Taking note of the rule before this one, replacements should be ready to jump in immediately if/when they're needed.
20) This game is closer to Vanilla in the Vanilla-Rolemadness scale. This game is not bastard.

Stupidity Aesthetics:

21) Maroon is my color. Don't steal.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:11:07 PM
Alive: [8/12]
1. Sky_Paladin
2. Darkninjaabc
5. CF7 NekoNekoRex
7. Validon98
8. Dormio
9. PX Mitsuki BigBangMeteor
10. Kilgamayan
12. Polaris

Plucked Before Prime: [5/13]
0. Raikaria - Admiral Apple - Vanilla Town - Killed N0
3. Serela - Bushido Banana - Town Best Pal - Lynched D1
4. SB - Omnipresent Onion - Town Restless Spirit - Killed N1
11. Shadoweh - Gluttonous Guava - Vanilla Town - Lynched D2
6. Cheez8 - Peril Pear - Vanilla Town - Lynched D3
[/b]

Useful Links:[/color]
VC1.1, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038139.html#msg1038139) VC1.2, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038247.html#msg1038247) VC1.3, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038357.html#msg1038357) VC1.4, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038486.html#msg1038486) VC1.5, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038614.html#msg1038614) VC1.6, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038734.html#msg1038734) VC1.65, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038773.html#msg1038773) VC1.7, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038875.html#msg1038875) VC1.8, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039068.html#msg1039068) Unofficial, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039252.html#msg1039252) VC1.9, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039337.html#msg1039337) VC1.91, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039378.html#msg1039378) VC1.92, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039424.html#msg1039424) VC1.93, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039455.html#msg1039455) VC1.94, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039501.html#msg1039501) VC1.966666, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039521.html#msg1039521) Flip. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039540.html#msg1039540)
VC2.1, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039822.html#msg1039822) VC2.2, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039853.html#msg1039853) VC2.3, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039952.html#msg1039952) VC2.35, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040142.html#msg1040142) VC2.4, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040288.html#msg1040288) VC2.5, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040451.html#msg1040451) VC2.6, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040542.html#msg1040542) VC2.7, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040679.html#msg1040679) VC2.8, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040816.html#msg1040816) VC2.85, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040885.html#msg1040885) VC2.9, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040985.html#msg1040985) VC2.85 REDUX, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041039.html#msg1041039) Flip. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041127.html#msg1041127)
VC3.1, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041375.html#msg1041375) VC3.2, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041517.html#msg1041517) VC3.3, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041610.html#msg1041610) VC3.4, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041774.html#msg1041774) VC3.5, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042024.html#msg1042024) VC3.6, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042233.html#msg1042233) VC3.7, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042416.html#msg1042416) Unofficial, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042643.html#msg1042643) VC3.8, (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042670.html#msg1042670) Flip (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042677.html#msg104267)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:12:31 PM
Um yeah sending PMs. That'll be done soon.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 30, 2013, 11:13:28 PM
Posting just to be first.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: PX on October 30, 2013, 11:17:51 PM
My fruit stinks. Like seriously, it's ass. Oh, confirm.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: SB on October 30, 2013, 11:25:58 PM
px an ass is not a fruit

confirming.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:28:33 PM
It literally just occurred to me on a fluke that I never put NNR on the list so I forgot about him. I can sub him in for Polly immediately if Polly is fine with that? Or he can be a sub. Tell me what you two think.

(Not done with PMs.)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Polaris on October 30, 2013, 11:32:43 PM
I'm fine with whatever NNR wants I guess :derp:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on October 30, 2013, 11:37:35 PM
Wait, explain that  differently? Am I going to be a hydra now or something?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on October 30, 2013, 11:38:57 PM
Don't make me a hydra btw, I want o see Kilga play.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 30, 2013, 11:39:22 PM
Either Polly-kun becomes your replacement, or you turn into a potential replacement.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:39:55 PM
I forgot you signed up. Polly signed up last. It's natural that to compensate I can swap you in instead, or you just stick around as sub #1. No hydra.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on October 30, 2013, 11:41:21 PM
I'd feel bad for kicking Polly out, but I'm also awful at subbing in, so I'll leave it to Polly since he's actually in the game (and also I want to avoid making a decision)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:42:47 PM
ANYWAY, now that I've checked if I haven't given someone two PMs, or linked the scum QT randomly (true story, that one), we can begin confirming. 4 of you have confirmed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on October 30, 2013, 11:43:05 PM
/in.... I guess???????????

i better not regret joining as soon as the game begins
Good job with that self-fulfilling prophecy btw
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Polaris on October 30, 2013, 11:43:49 PM
In that case I'd like to stay in the game :L

also confirming, assuming I have the slot
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 30, 2013, 11:47:13 PM
Then that's settled. You've already confirmed.

Game starts when all but 2 of {Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, Serela, CF7, Cheez8, Validon98, Kilgamayan, Shadoweh} confirm.

Bye.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 30, 2013, 11:50:15 PM
Confirming, I guess.

...Being wishy-washy already, I guess.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Kilgamayan on October 30, 2013, 11:57:49 PM
That was fast.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Raikaria on October 31, 2013, 12:06:31 AM
Clearly sign-ups were accelerated by me not being in them!

That or everyone wants to see me fail at modding.

Anyway; last you'll hear from me unless it's answering a question/votecount/Ect.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Validon98 on October 31, 2013, 12:14:29 AM
Confirm confirm confirm.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Serela on October 31, 2013, 01:27:26 AM
BT I want to give your avatar a big hug <3
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 01:39:39 AM
/confirm

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 31, 2013, 05:09:15 AM
{Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, Serela, CF7, Cheez8, Validon98, Kilgamayan, Shadoweh}
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 05:37:35 AM
Confirm!  Now off to read the role pm...
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: BT on October 31, 2013, 06:10:56 AM
Votecount 1.1

Not Voting: (12) Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, Serela, SB, CF7, Cheez8, Validon98, Dormio, PX, Kilgamayan, Shadoweh, Polaris

Day 1 lasts 72 hours and requires a majority of 7 votes to lynch.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on October 31, 2013, 06:43:38 AM
Vote Shadoweh

Surely you jest if you say that you cannot indulge in the clear fact that Shadoweh is one of the many rotten fruit, the spoiled sports, the so called "mafia", delaying the inedvitable introduction of our game to provide more time in which they can communicate to each other any plans they may or may not have thought up? Also, allowing all 3 scum to not confirm for infinite talk time is lame  >:(
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on October 31, 2013, 06:45:38 AM
Previous post is 72 words

Also, warning that I shall be partaking in a ceremony of holy matrimony this weekend, so do not expect me to be anywhere near this game come the end of the day. (37)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 06:45:56 AM
IMO I will totally throw PX off the trail by voting for one of my fellow last-to-confirm people, thus disproving that I am a scum, and therefore must be town. 

## vote CF7

I figured if I voted for Shadoweh I pretty much just painted scum on PX and my head, so. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 06:50:36 AM
##Vote Shadoweh

This message is directed at those of you who are uncertain of how we should act in the face of adversity. The contents are deceptively simple: Eliminate the vile scum from the face of our Earth. Shadoweh is of most likely circumstance to be aligned against our greater good. Those of you that do not agree with me may continue to hold those opinions for, as great as I am, I am not one to force my will upon others.

Instead I shall ask that those of you that do not agree with myself provide an answer to a question that you should not have any difficulty answering: For what reason or purpose do you believe that Shadoweh is not working towards bringing about our demise?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on October 31, 2013, 06:52:49 AM
You're not suposed to count the words yourselves guys, just let the pain flow naturally.

Also I was asleep, my blankets were sooooooo comfy!
##Vote: Dormio For being delicious.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 06:57:42 AM
##Vote: Dormio For being delicious.
Do you lot see this declaration of war on our humble collective efforts of fruits and vegetables? For what other reason would Shadoweh attempt to consume the delicious flesh of a fresh fruit or vegetable if she were not rotten to the core? Even one as disapproving of gambling as I is willing to wager that it is through the process of consuming the juicy flesh of young fruit and vegetable that Shadoweh maintains her deceptive appearance with which she infiltrated our ranks, despite being of old enough age to produce a foul odour otherwise.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 07:11:38 AM
What is going on. 

##unvote
##vote PX


Why not.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 07:17:01 AM
I have outed the vile and foul Shadoweh and exposed her true rotten core. You, and any others that may or may not be somewhat confused so as to regarding the current state of affairs, should simply believe in the one that shall be heralded as a champion for decades to come and assist me in my endeavour to slay the poorly fermented Shadoweh.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 07:57:46 AM
My favourite fruit is mango.  My favourite vegetable is brussel sprouts.  In Japan, where I live, there is a delicious mango and peach drink that is so sweet and gentle. 

However, there isn't any brussel sprout drinks.  I wonder if this is a new market that is yet to be tapped. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 07:58:45 AM
I feel a great disturbance in the grammar force. 

Should that be "isn't any brussel sprout drinks" or perhaps, "aren't any brussel sprout drinks". 

I'm an English teacher, so some small amount of respect hangs on this. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 08:00:46 AM
On a related note, I think carrot juice is terrible.  Maybe vegetable drinks aren't the way to go.  On the other hand, carrot cake is delicious.  Who came up with the great idea of going "Hey let's put vegetables in a cake". 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 08:12:58 AM
There are many that would say that to enjoy brussel sprouts require an acquired taste. Little do these masses know that the words 「acquired taste」 are little more than an attempt to appease those that disapprove of the harsh cruelties that children are exposed to on a regular basis by those that raise them.

To the one among us that claims to be in the profession of sharing their knowledge of English to the future generations, can you not join me in my endeavours? For I, too, am in the same line of work. I, too, do my utmost to share my knowledge and experience with those younger than myself so that they may learn more, experience more, and achieve more than I could. As you share the dream I do: The betterment of the future.

However, among our very compatriots are those that wish to work against us. These are villainous pieces of trash that are rotten to their very core. They will stop at nothing to bring about despair in others for nothing more than their own amusement. Shadoweh, the vile fruit that she is, is among these horrid beings that aim to bring about our downfall. Will you not assist me in removing her so that she can do no further harm to the next generation's future?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on October 31, 2013, 08:37:20 AM
Morning. I'm the juiciest and the tastiest. Also confirming and the like.
And since i can't vote Raikaria, since he's already dead i guess i'll ##vote PX. He gave me the most boring role in his setup.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on October 31, 2013, 09:01:00 AM
How could you not make me the serious banana?

##Vote: Shadoweh

Furious.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on October 31, 2013, 11:59:19 AM
Hello everyone, I see that things have began here, and I also have seen that people are making long posts just to empty that effort meter (from what I've seen).
People in general are being loquacious, but in particular I notice PX. Why count every single word that he has written? So that at the end, he can simply disappear from the game and lurk? A dangerous and suspicious thing indeed!
Well that, and his setup infuriated me somewhat.

##Vote: PX
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 12:15:48 PM
I feel bad about possibly being involved in a lynch on PX.  He just finished hosting a game and now he wants to play one.  As thanks for running the previous game, I'll cancel my vote on him~ 

This thanks is good for day 1 only though :D

## unvote
## vote no lynch


This will be my last post tonight - I'm putting in no lynch so there's no surprise hammers involving me while I'm sleeping.  Tomorrow is another day. 

About brussel sprouts:
I hated them until I was about 18 and living on my own.  One day I had no money and no food and only the brussel sprouts in the fridge that my mother had left for me as a "please don't die of hunger and make me look like a bad mother, you lazy, disorganised son" so I ate them.  Then I realised, the way to make any food taste good is to flavor it with hunger.  Unfortunately, the threat of starvation is not nearly enough.  A day or two of no meals, though, truly changes ones outlook. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on October 31, 2013, 12:21:57 PM
## unvote
## vote no lynch

This will be my last post tonight - I'm putting in no lynch so there's no surprise hammers involving me while I'm sleeping.  Tomorrow is another day. 
You are so precious.
Dormio: You called me a vile fruit. But the fruit are the townies, not the scum. Scumslip much? I rest my case. Lynch the venomous vegan!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 12:32:56 PM
Re: Brussel Sprouts
Lentils are the lifeblood of poverty stricken students without a job.

Dormio: You called me a vile fruit. But the fruit are the townies, not the scum. Scumslip much? I rest my case. Lynch the venomous vegan!
You're a rotten fruit. Old, mouldy, expired. Past your prime. Killing and eating your more youthful brethren in order to appear like them. A cannibal like you that lives on a diet of young fruit and vegetables could be nothing but the vegan we are trying to eliminate.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 01:25:54 PM
CF7 is clearly lying about being the tastiest fruit (that's me), but Dormio is talking way too much. This makes it much easier for me to find a reason to vote against Dormio, mostly out of increased motivation.

Considering I was under the assumption that the town would be composed of fruits and the scum would be composed of veggies, Dormio's claim that Shadoweh is a rotten fruit seems a little strange. Looking back, I do suppose a group of "vegan villains" could include fruits, but would somebody really come to that conclusion on their own? Why not simply peg her as a vegetable? Clearly, there are some rotten fruits among the scum, and Dormio knows this by being one of them.

##Vote: Dormio
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 01:32:00 PM
Oh, how pitiful the sight before me is. To have been blinded by my dazzling radiance. There is no other reason that one would be unable to see the truth behind Shadoweh's intentions, after all. Alas! Worry not, my child, for the light you see surrounding me is not one you have to fear. Simply follow it, and it shall guide you to glory.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on October 31, 2013, 01:39:47 PM
##Vote Dormio

One simply cannot fathom that a person as carefree as myself would seriously deign it a productive use of time to read all of that inane dribble coming out of thy mouth, heathen!

Also I was an idiot and volunteered to work an extra day this week so don't expect to see me around all the time for the next 5 days `-` Not like I won't still be posting daily or anything though
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 01:42:36 PM
So basically i am confused on shadowehs argument.

Its not like all town are vegetables. Heck, the name even goes veg and fruit.

Apprerciating someone for no lynch d1, shadoweh.
The entire point of rvs is for everyone to vote draw out the scum.
Being the other leading wagon here you imply that you want time for everyone to calm down and hopefully just random someone else? Instead of actually forming cases against dormio who is pushing yout.wagon? At the very least you could've pointed out his gibberish writing style and how little conteny he actually contributes to spark off some rivalry and prove both of you via communication

Your rather skittish way around early is unecessary. To shy away from d1 when its the only time to fool around is scummy. Moreover given how px is leading scum can well assume hes gonna get lynched anyway and slack. Your no lynch appreciation was that in a nutshell.


##Vote Shadoweh

d1 scum, new record

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Raikaria on October 31, 2013, 01:50:51 PM
Votecount 1.2

Shadoweh (4): PX, Dormio, SB, Darkninjaabc
PX (2): CF7, Validon98
Dormio (2): Shadoweh, Serela, Cheez8
No Lynch (1): Sky_Paladin

Not Voting: (2)  Kilgamayan, Polaris

Day 1 lasts 72 hours and requires a majority of 7 votes to lynch.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)

Note: Brown is my color; as the counterpart to Maroon; do not steal.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: BT on October 31, 2013, 01:53:56 PM
Addendum:

16) Don't even think about discussing flavor. It's purposefully nonsensical and you won't find anything there. "Rocky Rock" is a plausible nameclaim as far as you're concerned.
18) This game's ~*~thing~*~ is the effort bar. It looks something like this. (this totally isn't recycled, at all) (http://i.imgur.com/EYRbp8p.png) Each 24 hours during the day automatically add 400 words to your personal bar. Each word in a post (I can ignore posts that abuse this) erases a word from the bar. The bar doesn't go negative. If you hit over 800 words, you're replaced. If you hit over 1200 words, you're modkilled. You generally shouldn't be worried about this rule if you plan on playing the game.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 01:57:05 PM
I dont understand whats happening either with all these wagons branching off.

Unless we get conf nighttalk enabler we just get power roles confused on what to do by ending the day.

If a wagon is to press information out keep it directed towards 1 or 2 suspects. Its not like cheesing px out is scumhunting and just excuse him to ignore you which he is doing. Which makes him a null read. And a big part o fpowers is to clear nulls

I like the dormio wagon more intially since he is so excessively hyped. And hyped dormio usually means that there exist something for him to get excited. Had enough dota gamrs with him to call iut on that. Null read. Was gonna sheep before shadoweh popped up

And shadoweh biggest slip was nolynch appreciation. Enough reason to lynch anytime really .
I honestly dont know any other way to read this other than ''hey thanks for not jumping into  conclysions d1 you couldve lynched a townie during the time when its totally viable for so''
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 02:00:25 PM
##unvote

Still on you but dont want quickhammer . Advise otheras di same
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 02:04:29 PM
Whoops. I thought the whole concept behind Day 1 fingerpointing was that we were just supposed to make whatever claims we could, baseless or otherwise, until there's enough out there for people to start getting reads. Sorry about Rule 16 there.

Dormio's still talking far too much for what he's saying though. I'll just stop pretending I have any other reason to vote for him now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (Confirmation Phase)
Post by: Raikaria on October 31, 2013, 02:07:04 PM
Votecount 1.2

Shadoweh (4): PX, Dormio, SB, Darkninjaabc
PX (2): CF7, Validon98
Dormio (2): Shadoweh, Serela, Cheez8
No Lynch (1): Sky_Paladin

Not Voting: (2)  Kilgamayan, Polaris

Day 1 lasts 72 hours and requires a majority of 7 votes to lynch.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)

Note: Brown is my color; as the counterpart to Maroon; do not steal.

Slight amendment to the votecount; as No Lynch is a possible majority and separate from 'Not Voting'.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 02:18:09 PM
D1 is the best time for scumhunting for it forces everyone to swap gears on demand.

And in thi shurry to organize your case most slips can be discovered.

Last game i had made the fucking terrible mistake of scumreading hw and just decided to drop it for that it is rage inducing to type cases on  a phone.

Consider this post also a supplmentary elaboration on why i believe one slip os enough to justify the lynch on shadow
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 02:37:15 PM
...Yeah, sorry, but I really don't see that as a good reason to suspect Shadoweh. That "nl appreciation" seems more like a misinterpretation on your part, which gives me more reason to suspect you than it does to suspect her. Not enough that I'm willing to switch my vote, but enough that I'll definitely at least keep you in mind.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on October 31, 2013, 02:54:47 PM
Off-topic. Oh, god. I'm playing SK (1 time bulletproof) on other forum and i managed to pick a player with a counter attack and got myself shot on the first night. And then mafia!scum shot him too and he died. 
Anyway on topic.
While Dormio's posts are just *~GLORIOUS~* so far his posts have pretty much zero actual content in them.
CF7 is clearly lying about being the tastiest fruit (that's me)
I'm a potato. Nice to meet you.

Also i don't understand Darkie's case on Shadoweh. Where's that scumslip?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 03:00:36 PM
......:V

Forgive me but well.
You first denied my argument with no reasons given.
Then proceed to question whether my argument is valid at all. Again without elaboration?

It is also rather irritating that your entire post do not really contain any clogic. I am vomiting what i conclude to be solid scumread and you outright deny it with no reasons given. Your weird case and stance could qell rub off others and cause us to lose the moviation to lynch scum. So please respobse fully ty
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 03:05:03 PM
Alright ao i guess its not only chees who cannot underatand it.

I can go into tutor mode then.

Basically shadoweh told us was that''you guys shouldn't jump on wagons''.
This statement itself given the current game time is bizzare. D1 is the only time where town avtually has the most freedom in lynching for the game impact is relatively little. Aka skill and information revealed by flips can compensate for one or two power roles
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 03:14:33 PM
Accidentally ramme dpost button on phone.

So my point was that showing intent for towb to go nolynch d1 by itself is of hinderance to town, this bein combined with the fact that hes the leading wagon makes him to have all the necessary motives to try and brush off the rvs.

Its abit of gutread tbh. But that doesnt make the rest of my logic flawed. So please think abeit about it.

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on October 31, 2013, 03:22:48 PM
Hummmm. Somehow i'm not sure if we're playing the same mafia game. Shadoweh posts.
You're not suposed to count the words yourselves guys, just let the pain flow naturally.
Also I was asleep, my blankets were sooooooo comfy!
##Vote: Dormio For being delicious.
First post.
You are so precious.
Dormio: You called me a vile fruit. But the fruit are the townies, not the scum. Scumslip much? I rest my case. Lynch the venomous vegan!
Answer to Sky_Paladin post. Who actually voted no_lynch.

So either you confused her quote for her actual post or :derp:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 03:25:09 PM
oy, potatoes aren't juicy

And I gave you a reason, Darkie. The way I interpreted Shadoweh's post is different than the way you did, and frankly I'm having trouble managing to interpret it the way you claim it's meant. (Of course, that could just be my unfamiliarity showing. Doubtful though.) I read her statement more as a comment on Paladin's character rather than his decision to not vote for someone. Nothing about that seems scummy to me at all.

While I understand D1 is the most acceptable time to accidentally lynch a townie, that doesn't mean we should jump on the first wagon that pops up. You said earlier that D1 is the best time for scumhunting because it forces everyone to swap gears on demand. Even if I disagree as to why, I still agree that people's actions and decisions on D1 are pretty important in the long run for figuring out who's with who. If that's the case, what reason would you have for wanting to end D1 as quickly as possible? I'm serious here. That only gives the town less info to work with.

I haven't used logic much because I haven't been making real cases so far, and I didn't use it in my response because it was too simple: I thought you were mistaken. Not much more to explain there, though I've tried my best here.

Essentially, I fail to see how Shadoweh's post supports a no-lynch, and it looks like I'm not alone. And I have thought about this, thank you.

Anyway, I think I'm going to really be suspicious of you for the time being.


aagh and now CF7 posts, I'm just going to post this first and reply to that afterwards. Sheesh, I take too long.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Oh yeah that's right, Shadoweh isn't going the no lynch route anyway. Another mark against her supporting a no lynch attitude, as far as I'm concerned.

This certainly doesn't mean she's town or anything, of course, but what you're seeing is really just a null tell and you're misreading it something fierce.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 03:39:13 PM
another thing
Basically shadoweh told us was that''you guys shouldn't jump on wagons''.
As far as I'm concerned this is the correct attitude to have. Thinking is better than jumping on a wagon without thinking. Jumping on one AFTER thinking about it is different, but after thinking about it, I see no reason to jump on the Shadoweh wagon.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 03:43:45 PM
Thanks for your swifr response on demand.

I guess i will digest that properly and further elaborate tomorrow.
Reread imminent.

But meanwhile i must clarify that i am not pushing day end. Through speculation and accusation one reveals information of the one being. And theres that you are taking everything i said at face value.
They are not.

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 03:51:29 PM
Moreover speculating who the scum are is radically different from ending the day. Arey you actually aruging for that we should all keep our reads to ourselves?

I would also point out that i have cancelled my vote against shadow. So that was an empty accusation on your part
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 04:00:22 PM
But meanwhile i must clarify that i am not pushing day end. Through speculation and accusation one reveals information of the one being. And theres that you are taking everything i said at face value.
They are not.
Understood, I'll reconsider as well. Sorry to say I'm still going to keep my eye on you for a bit, since I still have a bit of suspicion towards you. It's nothing I'm willing to act on yet though.

Moreover speculating who the scum are is radically different from ending the day. Arey you actually aruging for that we should all keep our reads to ourselves?
Haha, no. That would be dumb. I'd question where the heck you got that idea but unless you're not convinced I don't see a reason to make a debate out of something we agree on.

I would also point out that i have cancelled my vote against shadow. So that was an empty accusation on your part
True, but you did say you're still suspicious of her and mostly want to avoid quick hammers.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 04:02:19 PM
(although yes I did entirely forget you cancelled that vote, whoops)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 04:11:38 PM
Btw i dont know how to put this but your arguments are weird. But atm i am too sleepy to wall nor think.

Getting sleep
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on October 31, 2013, 06:35:21 PM
CF7,  if you think that Dormio is scummy for spamposting, why are you not voting him for it? Same with Cheez on Dark. You should really get an avatar btw.

##Unvote
##Vote: Dark


Why are you taking Shadoweh's early posts so seriously? It seemed pretty obvious that she was just joking around. I'm also not sure why you want people to consolidate on RVS wagons when they're not particularly threatening since none of the votes mean anything. You're not really gonna get a reaction out of anyone with them.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on October 31, 2013, 06:40:42 PM
I don't actually appreciate no-lynches at all. Most experienced players here don't! Hence why Sky Paladin suggesting one is a good idea is adorable.

##Unvote
##Vote: Darkninja


I also didn't tell anyone not to jump on wagons. I clearly attacked onto a wagon myself, so I find your misrepresentation to be scummy.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 06:50:41 PM
CF7,  if you think that Dormio is scummy for spamposting, why are you not voting him for it? Same with Cheez on Dark. You should really get an avatar btw.

Mostly because I haven't had it in mind yet to go through his posts again and the things that I had noticed in his posts weren't really that scummy. Honestly though, what he said at the end about taking his posts at face value when I wasn't even going to vote for him did make me a little bit suspicious about why he felt the need to defend himself.

I feel bad about voting on such a whim, but... well, it is Day 1, isn't it? Might as well.
##Unvote
##Vote: Darkninja

Anyway, righto, avatar time. Soon. ish.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on October 31, 2013, 07:08:44 PM
Well I looked through the thread on my offtime at school (although I avoided posting because holy crap TOR is the slowest thing ever, the only real use it has is to read the thread periodically so that I don't get overwhelmed by content when I get home), and I'm getting irked at a few people, although to be honest really none of them have been too irksome to really cause me to go for them. Dormio is being overly loquacious without saying much of anything, probably to avoid the problems associated with the effort bar. It would be better if those 400 words were made up of actual content, not wordy slapfights with Shadoweh over flavor (which, by the way, BT mentioned doesn't really matter because again, the flavor just gives a theme, it doesn't always imply alignment). Sky_Paladin irks me a lot with his decision to go no lynch over merely unvoting. It might just be a rookie mistake or something like that, but voting no lynch on D1 is a super bad idea. Information is gathered better in D2 onwards if at least there is one lynch so that there is a flip. I'll be paying attention to you, Sky. Dark also troubles me somewhat because he implied something about Shadoweh that she never really said regarding supporting a no lynch. Town or scum, I never have really known Shadoweh for NOT pursuing some sort of lynch D1. You're being tryhard again, Dark. That said, I don't think Cheez's arguments necessarily make him town, but they certainly don't make him scummy either. So null.
Of course, I'm not ready to vote on any of these. D1 has always been a "take things with a grain of salt" thing for me, seeing as it always seems we manage to lynch town instead of scum D1 over something silly or that appears to be scummy but really isn't.

##Unvote

Until there's more content to parse that's preferably not RVS-related stuff, I won't vote for anyone.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on October 31, 2013, 07:38:18 PM
SB, I must ask that you partake in explaining why it is so that taking early posts so seriously is such a bad manner? Because as far as I see it, early posts can be an important aspect of moving on with the game so that we stop dilly dallying forever.

As for the mister... cheez... why are you partaking in this silly little wagon on dark?

And for Validon, I would parse that nice little block of  :wikipedia: you have, but that ugly little thing does quite some damage to my eyes.

Vote SB
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on October 31, 2013, 07:42:39 PM
Votecount 1.3

Shadoweh (1): Dormio
PX (1): CF7
Dormio (0): Serela
Darkninjaabc (3): SB, Shadoweh, Cheez8
SB (1): PX
No Lynch (1): Sky_Paladin

Not Voting: (4)  Kilgamayan, Polaris; Darkninjaabc, Validon98

Day 1 lasts 72 hours and requires a majority of 7 votes to lynch.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on October 31, 2013, 08:23:14 PM
I have outed the vile and foul Shadoweh and exposed her true rotten core. You, and any others that may or may not be somewhat confused so as to regarding the current state of affairs, should simply believe in the one that shall be heralded as a champion for decades to come and assist me in my endeavour to slay the poorly fermented Shadoweh.
You are so precious.
Dormio: You called me a vile fruit. But the fruit are the townies, not the scum. Scumslip much? I rest my case. Lynch the venomous vegan!

Because posts like these don't contribute anything at all as far as indicating alignment goes. Commenting on early stuff is important, but spamposts in RVS are pretty much a nulltell and voting someone for pretty obvious jokeposts is bad imo.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 08:27:14 PM
I'm pretty sure that Shadoweh is laughing as hard as I am right now about people taking my posts seriously. That does, however, lead me to a couple of interesting responses. In particular, Darkninjaabc's response is one that reeks of somebody trying too hard. Like, you know, trying to tack on reasons that aren't there. However, since a bunch of other people are already voting him for it, I don't think that there's really much need for me to add to that for now.
I'll read more once I'm back from classes.

Anyway, waiting for a couple of people to do that thing where they actually post. People like Serela, Kilga, and Polly-kun.

Dormio's still talking far too much for what he's saying though.
Also, Cheez8 is clearly unfamiliar with Meiya.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 08:28:23 PM
You know, I want to start calling Sky_Paladin "Sky_Palladium" and Cheez8 "Cheezoid".
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on October 31, 2013, 08:51:55 PM
Something the new people might need to know:Day 1 usually starts by everyone jokevoting everyone else with no real reasoning and everyone just kind of messes around. Somehow this consistently turns into actual half-reasonable discussion within 12 or so hours. Or at least less then 24 >_>

My reaction upon coming back from work and seeing the posts from the recently-joined-mafia-here people was just "oh god why?!" XD

Anyway I'll reread some of the less silly posts from here so I can make a vote that isn't a complete joke, since there should be enough for a somewhat-not-baseless accusation now :D
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on October 31, 2013, 09:01:21 PM
##vote dormio again for being meiya

okay no

But yeah all the things I can see are either A.Making a vote that I can explain but seriously do not believe in at all (Example:Dark taking obvious jokeposts seriously and doing silly stuff as a result) or B.In addition to being A, it relies on useless and easily-circular logic (Voting SB for saying Dark's posts are bad, voting PX for voting SB for saying Dark's posts are bad)

I'M JUST GOING TO KEEP VOTING MEIYA
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 09:04:04 PM
Noting Serela's refusal to make any real opinion of his own.
Also noting that I might be late for class.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on October 31, 2013, 09:22:41 PM
all the half-decent opinions I could see are the ones I pointed out and I super don't care about any of them
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 09:30:57 PM
Also, Cheez8 is clearly unfamiliar with Meiya.
Somehow I get the feeling I don't need to be familiar.

As for the mister... cheez... why are you partaking in this silly little wagon on dark?
I have a very weak reason to be slightly suspicious of Dark. So far, I have less reason to be suspicious of anybody else. Far as I can tell it doesn't really matter, though I guess it's a little bit inconvenient that between the time I realized I wanted to vote for him and the time I actually did vote for him two other people did the same. I wouldn't call it a wagon though, and if it does become a wagon before I'm convinced enough you can bet I'm taking my vote back.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 09:52:13 PM
...Okay yeah, never mind. As much as there is to make me suspicious of Darkie, I really can't shake the feeling I get of a person who's just trying way too hard. Mostly in his earlier posts. Still not too sure what to think of him suddenly dropping the subject and making amends at the end, but that's really not enough to keep me convinced about my vote.

##Unvote
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on October 31, 2013, 10:02:07 PM
Of course, I'm not ready to vote on any of these. D1 has always been a "take things with a grain of salt" thing for me, seeing as it always seems we manage to lynch town instead of scum D1 over something silly or that appears to be scummy but really isn't.

##Unvote

Until there's more content to parse that's preferably not RVS-related stuff, I won't vote for anyone.

I don't get this mentality. Things change quickly on day 1, so why are you so unwilling to vote? And why is the italics even relevant. Serela's post is essentially "I'M GOING TO CONTINUE TO NOT CONTRIBUTE".

100% accurate RVS Scumteam: Dark, Serela, Validon

Now watch me die night 1. I'd be in stitches if I did.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 10:14:44 PM
Everything always happens while I'm asleep, zzz.  I guess it's my fault for living in the wrong hemisphere. 

Ah now, let's see.  So about me voting no lynch - this was just because I thought, if I voted for anybody, maybe there'd be a lynch on that person, and I didn't have any strong reads at the time.  After reading the rest of the thread, I realise my mistake - 'no lynch' can be hammered too!  I should totally have just voted no vote.  Sorry for my mistake.

SO LETS GO WITH THE JOKE VOTES! 

I missed out on lynching CF7 last game so I want to get a shot this time. 
##unvote
## vote CF7


On a related note, I totally pushed for Shadoweh's death and I never got to kill them last game :/  Life is full of missed opportunities.  Maybe I should vote for Shadoweh instead.  Choices, choices.  But in my deepest darkest heart of hearts, I have to admit I don't have a reading either way and I'm just screwing around.  Sigh. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 10:18:35 PM
So why is it that you're insisting on attempting to extend the RVS by jokevoting when there is actual discussion starting?

Still in class, proper read when I get home, etc.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 10:24:50 PM
Well I saw Dark and CF7 starting again and I was worried we were going to see a Day1 explode like last game, which wound up distracting more than helping.  I'm glad to see that's apparently defused. 

There's a few people that haven't posted much/yet.  There's plenty of time until the end of the phase.  Also, seeing as I've been in a grand total of 1 game here where we managed to lynch zero mafia, I'm dubious of the so called 'best course of action' right now. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 10:26:54 PM
Then shouldn't you be, like, doing that thing where you, you know, look for the scum yourself if you don't agree with the thoughts that other people are posting?

Still in class etc.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 10:31:02 PM
As opposed to voting for reasons specified to be nothing more than a joke at this stage, that is.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on October 31, 2013, 10:32:27 PM
People can have different opinions from me and still be right.  In the last game, I made several mistakes.  Merely disagreeing is of little value.  I'm looking for inconsistent behaviour at this stage. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on October 31, 2013, 10:36:28 PM
I don't particularly agree with that, since consistency is not consistent, but that's more an argument about play style or something.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on October 31, 2013, 10:44:28 PM
Reading this thread is already boring. Too many useless words, too much newbie panic over darkninja hammers when people are at L-4 or L-5 or whatever.

##Vote: Validon YOU THOUGHT YOU COULD GET AWAY WITH JOINING A GAME WITHOUT GETTING SHOUTED AT HUH

#72 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038342.html#msg1038342) is my least favorite post of the game by a fair margin. The large wordy paragraph block is annoying to read and has the extra bonus of throwing out a bunch of pseudo-suspicions before concluding with no vote on anyone. It's built to look helpful without actually being helpful. Why bother just pointing out a bunch of bad things? You should be giving the rest of us reasons to look at something and potentially pursue.

Darkninjalphabet's entire posting history irks me but I can't tell how much of my disagreement with his ideas is based on not being able to communicate them properly due to phone posting.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on October 31, 2013, 11:00:05 PM
##vote dormio again for being meiya
okay no
But yeah all the things I can see are either A.Making a vote that I can explain but seriously do not believe in at all (Example:Dark taking obvious jokeposts seriously and doing silly stuff as a result) or B.In addition to being A, it relies on useless and easily-circular logic (Voting SB for saying Dark's posts are bad, voting PX for voting SB for saying Dark's posts are bad)
I'M JUST GOING TO KEEP VOTING MEIYA
As much as I hate to point it out, despite being a Godmother Meiya was Town. Are you actively voting for town, Serela?
I take pleasure in how Dormio makes new and exciting reasons to lynch me every Day 1, it's traditional. I supose I don't mind since it gives people something to do, even if it's punching me. I can take it, I'll eat all the pain you give me and spit it out good as new!

Sky P: That Day 1 episode you're talking about cleared them both as obvtown, so I don't know why you'd want to defuse it really. Letting people talk is important to getting reads on them.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on October 31, 2013, 11:15:11 PM
Probably gonna be parroting a lot of stuff :derp:

##Vote: Sky Paladin

For the banal yet completely valid reason that Sky Paladin is jokevoting when that is p. much done and over with.

I also agree with Kilga's post completely.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on October 31, 2013, 11:17:51 PM
I said "parroting a lot of stuff" but I ended up barely saying anything, oops ._.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on October 31, 2013, 11:22:08 PM
Oh yeah, and PX's vote is kind of "huh?" to me since it seems to be founded mainly upon playstyle differences with SB rather than actual scumminess. I would think the other two people he mentioned in his post were more worthy of a vote. PX what do you think about this?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on October 31, 2013, 11:25:46 PM
##Unvote
##Vote: Validon


Actually now that I think about it, I think Validon's paragraph post is a lot worse than Sky Paladin's frivolity >_> I might have just been self conscious about sheeping Kilga too much.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on October 31, 2013, 11:27:50 PM
Noting Serela's refusal to make any real opinion of his own.
Also noting that I might be late for class.
For what it's worth, this post bothers me enough to suspect Dormio over anybody else right now. Guess I should start bringing my opinions up sooner.
This feels like a false accusation that could be interpreted as true if you aren't paying enough attention. Seems minor, but not as minor as everything else is.
I'll mull it over while I eat, I guess.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 11:36:39 PM
Logic bad means that i am scum? I am but attempting my best to at the very least fufill my quota for i get 4 hours of internet a day. On either phone or library computers no less. Did you even know i already took 2 minutes going through so far.

It was more guts less logic. Scum shadow is laughing off his sides right now seeing how everyone defended his minor slip without him actually needing to.

And this entire exchange now that i think about it is pure weird. Cheez somehow agreed with the point that joleposting seriously is scumtell. Yet all that time he was basically taking what he calss "a misinterpreted and wrong argument". This paradoxical defend was what made me scratch my head ao hard. Then i assumed hes an enthusisatic scum. Who is also bouncing around wagons. Then it apl makes sense.

If anything i would really appreciate if you can first assume shadoweh is scum. Then see cheez as paranoid scum swooping in to defend him.

I know the logic isnt really clear but at least i thought i should out whoever i have a strong read on. I want to havr you see the picture i amseeing but five minutes isnt wnough.

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on October 31, 2013, 11:37:36 PM
Voting onc ehome
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on October 31, 2013, 11:42:00 PM
Ugh, sorry for the blocky paragraph, I was trying to get my thoughts down and in the process forgot how formatting works.

@SB: I know things change over the period of D1, I just would prefer to put my vote out when the discussion gets off of RVS topics, which it is appearing to do right now. Also D1 has always been a bad sort of day for me, because at that point I really don't know what to think. I prefer relying on hard evidence over reading cues from people's posts, and D1 has a distinct lack of hard evidence.

@Kilga: OF COURSE I DIDN'T THINK I WOULD I THINK EVERY GAME I'VE BEEN IN I'VE BEEN SHOUTED AT AT SOME POINT USUALLY BY SHADOWEH. :VVVVVVV
On a more serious note, my paragraph, again, was terribly formatted because I was just trying to get my thoughts down and sometimes that leads to me forgetting how to format things so that people don't get a headache reading it.

As for more recent developments, Sky_Paladin is earning some points in my book because of A- Simple mistakes on his part, and B- The only thing I had against him was the no lynch thing, which isn't an issue anymore so he's sitting completely null instead of leaning scum. Also, as for consistency, that tends to not be the best way to determine scum. Yes, it works sometimes, but I was yelled at acting different in Town Mafia and the same occurred with Raikaria in the last game. Both of us ended up being town. Not to say that it doesn't work, but it's not as reliable as other methods. Also jokeposts are jokeposts but that's not reason in my book to vote him.

Serela is Serela and while he hasn't said much, I wouldn't say that necessarily he is scum or anything. In other words, Dormio, there's nothing really new about Serela posting as he did.

SB needs to contribute more. All he has mentioned is RVS related stuff and yelling at me for not voting. Well excuse me, I don't have any real strong convictions yet. I'm reading a heavily null game from everyone here. The same thing with Polaris although he has showed a bit more diversity with his posts, although in both cases I would just imagine null.

Shadoweh is being Shadoweh, Dormio is being Dormio. Null on both, although I would like to see from scumreads from Dormio.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on October 31, 2013, 11:49:59 PM
I don't scumslip as scum. B| I don't post enough to make scumslips. And I get better sleep!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on October 31, 2013, 11:53:34 PM
Vaaaaaaaaalllllllliiiiiiiiiidoooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn is that all :(
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on October 31, 2013, 11:53:52 PM
is polaris manix in disguise
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 12:06:27 AM
Validon uses too many words to say he has no real scumreads and yet he's asking me and Dormio to contribute more? What? He's also asking us over Serela who's done like nothing so yeah. Also agree with Kilga's analysis.

##Unvote
##Vote: Validon

Don't like how Darkninja is trying to draw up associative reads without a flip. Cheez wasn't the only one who thought your logic was horrible, does that make use all scum?

For what it's worth, this post bothers me enough to suspect Dormio over anybody else right now. Guess I should start bringing my opinions up sooner.
This feels like a false accusation that could be interpreted as true if you aren't paying enough attention. Seems minor, but not as minor as everything else is.
I'll mull it over while I eat, I guess.

To be fair Serela basically said that all of the votes were pointless and that everyone else got to the only "half-decent opinions" before he could. Actually thinking like that maybe he's paranoid scum who doesn't want to be seen as sheeping. Serela, specify your opinions please.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on November 01, 2013, 12:14:11 AM
Vaaaaaaaaalllllllliiiiiiiiiidoooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn is that all :(

Is that all in what way? As in my thoughts? I am honest when I say I don't have any major convictions on anything right now. I guess I didn't really say anything about the argument between Cheez and Dark, although I did mention earlier I do think Dark is being very tryhard, though I read that null.

Cut: @SB: You're right, Serela has done nothing and I would like him to contribute more as well, it's just that I went into meta mode and assumed it was just Serela being Serela. Honestly I want to see more out of anyone who hasn't really said a lot.

Also I'm probably just going to shut up now, I have nothing to add to the conversation and writing more at this point would just be me pointing out the obvious. >.<
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 12:15:05 AM
Quote
Serela, specify your opinions please.
I wasn't talking about other's opinions as much as ones I could be attempting to have myself (and why I wasn't interested in any of them)

it's a kind of stupid post to make and I probably should have just waited until later, but the issue is I had made a post right before that before I seriously went through the thread >_> So I had become obligated to do something (it would have been much worse to not post afterwords!)

I'm def. gonna look through the new stuff before I go to bed though and try to create real opinions
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: BT on November 01, 2013, 12:21:15 AM
Votecount 1.4

Validon (2): Kilgamayan, Polaris, SB
CF7 (1): Sky_Paladin
Shadoweh (1): Dormio
PX (1): CF7
SB (1): PX
Darkninjaabc (1): Shadoweh
Dormio (0): Serela

Not Voting: (3) Darkninjaabc, Validon98, Cheez8

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in 53.5 hours.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 01, 2013, 12:27:03 AM
Well, to be honest, I thought both PX and Mirai voting for Shadoweh right off the bat was kind of suspicious.  I didn't want to vote for PX because they hosted the last game.  Mirai has been posting a lot too but it's mostly been..uh...padding the word count.  Normally I would think scum wouldn't want to get that kind of attention but behaving in a 'townlike behaviour' to try and throw off suspicion is a strategy, too. 
The votes for Shadoweh came in right at the start before anybody had really said anything, so they could easily be called joke votes.  Except Dormio's vote is still there.  Maybe they thought "Lets try and lynch a skilled player" but when there wasn't a bus, PX switched off. 

I don't know, maybe it's just a coincidence.  But it's the only semi-scum reading I've got. 

##unvote
##vote Mirai


Also, it seems Serela's vote counts for 0?  I guess we're not a democracy~
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 12:29:06 AM
@Validon: It's just disappointing that you can say so many things without voting. Is there really nobody you find suspicious?

Hopefully Cheez can also get back to us with a vote too.

I'm def. gonna look through the new stuff before I go to bed though and try to create real opinions

but Serela, by that point you will have already been torn to pieces.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 12:34:57 AM
but Serela, by that point you will have already been torn to pieces.
To my utter joy people's reactions have been "it's just serela being serela"

...I mean, meta excusing bad play would be terrible, but I think when the game's still practically in rvs it's excusable enough ;_;

Also I'm not the only one who's vote isn't counting if you look at that votecount! POLLY WHAT DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD MAKE OF THIS
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 12:41:32 AM
Well, to be honest, I thought both PX and Mirai voting for Shadoweh right off the bat was kind of suspicious.  I didn't want to vote for PX because they hosted the last game.  Mirai has been posting a lot too but it's mostly been..uh...padding the word count.  Normally I would think scum wouldn't want to get that kind of attention but behaving in a 'townlike behaviour' to try and throw off suspicion is a strategy, too. 
The votes for Shadoweh came in right at the start before anybody had really said anything, so they could easily be called joke votes.  Except Dormio's vote is still there.  Maybe they thought "Lets try and lynch a skilled player" but when there wasn't a bus, PX switched off. 

I don't know, maybe it's just a coincidence.  But it's the only semi-scum reading I've got. 

##unvote
##vote Mirai


Also, it seems Serela's vote counts for 0?  I guess we're not a democracy~

You don't really get a lot from RVS votes since they're usually not serious (or a crumb if there's a night 0 but there wasn't in this case) so I don't think you can really analyse that too much. 

Validon's response to accusations is to stop posting, which doesn't fly with me. Dormio should get a new vote when he's out of class.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on November 01, 2013, 12:45:24 AM
@Polaris: Okay, well looking at everyone else, PX is really one of the few people I haven't mentioned, and... not much else to say about him either. I'm in that strange state where a whole lot has been said, but nothing is blatantly scummy enough for me to pursue a vote. This is why I just want to hold off until more stuff has actually happened, then pick apart the new stuff. Until then, I don't have much else to say that isn't already obvious.

Cut: @SB: My response is to not really post anymore for now because again, not much else to say that isn't "EVERYONE IS NULL RIGHT NOW" at the moment. I'll get back to you once there's more for me to look at.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 12:55:44 AM
...I chose a piss-poor time to eat dinner.
And this entire exchange now that i think about it is pure weird. Cheez somehow agreed with the point that joleposting seriously is scumtell.
False. When did I do that?
Yet all that time he was basically taking what he calss "a misinterpreted and wrong argument". This paradoxical defend was what made me scratch my head ao hard. Then i assumed hes an enthusisatic scum. Who is also bouncing around wagons. Then it apl makes sense.

If anything i would really appreciate if you can first assume shadoweh is scum. Then see cheez as paranoid scum swooping in to defend him.
Oh boy. I'd be worried for myself except I'm pretty sure nobody's buying your argument that Shadoweh is scum, so this is completely invalid.

As for everything else, on the one hand I'd like to see more out of Validon but on the other hand he has a point about how much null-reading there is. How's this, Validon: What can you tell us about people who you think aren't null reads?

I've got a few people I'm deciding between, and I'll talk more about them soon but I feel like responding to this first is a good idea.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 12:56:45 AM
@Validon: Ok but you better know that we're going to lynch you if you don't start scumhunting at some point  ::)

@serela: obviously your vote is worth just as much as your puny existence. how does it feel to live such a miserable life ufufufu
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 01:00:52 AM
Oh right and those votecounts are weird. Don't know whether I should be bothered by that but I'm not right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 01:30:32 AM
Alright, so there are a couple people I'm inclined to suspect more than others right now:

Validon: I really do understand how there's not much to go off of, and preferring more solid night action info, but... don't you at least have opinions, or people you take with more grains of salt than others or something? It almost seems like you're afraid to form an opinion, honestly, though I'm hoping that'll change by the time I'm finished with this post. (Nope, didn't happen yet. Too bad.)

SB: Couldn't tell you why. I guess it's because his posts seem... well, very self-assured, if I'm being perfectly honest. Not sure why that would be something I distrust, except maybe it makes me feel like people are being played or distracted from certain parts of arguments because of it. I can't really support this very well though which is a sign that SB is very good at being scum and we should lynch him now! That, or I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely.

Dark: I want to think he's a misguided townie but he just doesn't stop.

Dormio: It's still something small and I get how I could be wrong here, but bringing up a point against Serela for not having forming an opinion at a time when there generally weren't good opinions to form is a bit iffy to me. Mostly because I was basically in the same boat at that point, and seeing someone called out for that made me indignant or something.

People also seem to have opinions on Paladin but for whatever reason I can't get a good read on him.

It's not like these are very strong, but I have to start somewhere. Validon's the one I'm wariest of right now though, so I'll rest my vote on him until he says something new.

##Vote: Validon
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 01, 2013, 01:35:10 AM
Anyone wanna step up and volunteer themselves as Polaris' scumbuddy responsible for talking him into that vote turnaround? <_<

Cheez, why aren't you voting for Dormio right now?

Willing to pencil Darkninjalphabet in as town for the time being, his thought process looks genuine even if I disagree with the conclusions and then some with the justification.

"X being X" is not contributing, especially when it is used multiple times in reference to different people. Many other people have also already pointed out for me that Validon's response to my accusation that he was not saying meaningful things was to continue not saying meaningful things so I won't repeat them beyond acknowledging it here. I would keep my vote where it is EXCEPT...

I like how multiple people have fewer votes than names attached. FOR SCIENCE! ##Unvote, ##Vote: Kilgamayan

SB are you Carthrat in disguise ?_?

Cut by another Validon vote. Not sure I like it being a parrot when I wanted to see where Cheez's Dormio suspicions would go, as much as I can't disagree with Validon votes right now.

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 01:36:57 AM
Excuse you Kilga I make my own decisions.
/me hairflip[/url]
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 01, 2013, 01:41:37 AM
Clearly you do. Deciding that the color tags and url tags have the same functionality isn't going to make it true, though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 01:42:47 AM
Cheez, why aren't you voting for Dormio right now?
...
Cut by another Validon vote. Not sure I like it being a parrot when I wanted to see where Cheez's Dormio suspicions would go, as much as I can't disagree with Validon votes right now.
If it helps, Dormio's a pretty close second. Most of the reason I went with Validon instead is because I'm hoping to see something substantial from him soon, and if that happens I might be able to trust him enough to change my vote.

Of course, this depends on Validon having an opinion. I'm hoping that isn't a long shot.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 01:43:38 AM
Curses, I still need to perfect the art of hairflipping so that I don't mess up my BBCode tags ;_;

but it's the [me] tag though not the [color] tag
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 01:53:31 AM
Polly you joined in messing up tags with me <3 It's the same ones I messed up! We even got called out by the same person.

BEST FRIENDSi'llstoplurkinginanhour
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 02:05:55 AM
best friends? you must be delusional. no one who hasn't given proper opinions is a friend of mine. /me flips hair
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 03:06:03 AM
hit backspace, browser goes back instead of deleting your text

post is lost

cry
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 03:08:16 AM
I'll never understand why they keep that feature.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 01, 2013, 03:12:19 AM
I'm finally back. Maybe. Just getting a rough post out for now.

Anyway.
##Unvote
I have to agree with Shadoweh that Sky Palladium is absolutely adorable and I want to treasure him forever.

Moving on.
##Vote Serela
Cheez8 buddying pretty hard to Serela raises a lot of eyebrows to me, but this doesn't change the fact that Serela is simply perpetuating his D1 reputation that he always complains about.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 01, 2013, 03:14:51 AM
So I'm going to go out on a limb and hold some hope that Serela's #125 is indicative of actual content coming from him rather than the usual fluff that he delivers. The despair I experience when my hopes are crushed will be delicious.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 01, 2013, 03:18:15 AM
So Serela, I'm guessing you don't know why you've consistently not had a vote in the votecounts?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 03:24:08 AM
It turns out the pressure of ranting up a post until I home is too much.

So I took the detour of a 10min trip to dorm library.

Basically I see the validon logic, but I don't agree with it, will rant later.

Cheez is not null anymore, and my policy is to lynch nulls.

So basically.

I am thrown off my track right now, I still see shadoweh is harmful scum though.

##Vote Shadoweh

Note that my stance has never changed but just that there's no imminient risk of quickhammer I assume that its safe to Vote.

And guys you really want scum to  quickend d1 right.

Validon can very well be killed before he can retaliate so there.


Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 03:28:51 AM
Bulletpoints of what was lost because I cannot summon willpower to retype

1.Darkie is as difficult to read as the previous game
2.Is Darkie really telling us to read Shadoweh and Cheez while assuming they are scum, in order to see his point of view? (post in question: here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038460.html#msg1038460)
3.Assuming someone, especially multiple people, as scum... makes it pretty easy to make cases on why almost anyone is scummy; the issue is that making the assumption is a terrible idea (Goal:Start with what they are doing, point out why this makes them scummy- doing it in reverse does not work very well because, like a maze, it is far easier to do that way; and mafia unfortunately is not as simple a matter as getting from point a to point b)

anyway uh, I have no idea how to read dark so moving on

lol cut by dormio voting me for not making a post of actual contribution when I'm literally doing that right now and just talked about losing a post of it >_> "I'm mad at Serela because they haven't finished their post yet!"

Honestly, before I lost my post mid-way I was planning on giving up and voting PX because I really just don't see anything I think I can get any kind of even vaguely hopeful read off of past the stuff I mentioned earlier that I thought was too pointless to actually vote people over. (Aka, I was going to quote my previous post and say "nevermind, this is my vote and why") But I think I'd rather vote Dormio for his eagerness to vote me for noncontribution while I've stated I was about to make a post of it and then even showed some sign of apparently being in the middle of really getting it done. (the next post I got cut by almost makes me want to go back on this vote because it comes clearer he's pressuring me simply for not having actually delivered it quite yet, but seeing as my previously planned px vote was giving-up-tier, well)

##Vote Dormio

Other things:There's several posts I wanted to point out as being needlessly fluffy, then I realized it (IMO) comprises most posts in the game so far simply because ED1 and decided it'd be pointless >_> The less completely insignificant ones would have been Shadoweh voting Dormio for OMGUS and then making insignificant quips with next to no actual meaningfulness. but given the current state of the game I can't blame her.

Next up would be that SkyPaladin essentially jokevoting isn't good, but honestly doesn't bother me as much as the people voting him over it given that I have trouble finding anyone I'd care to vote. Then again, I read his post again and he doesn't even seem to have tried to find people to vote >_> Nevermind, I guess I can't blame anyone voting him after all.

I see Darkie talking again and I really want to understand, but I read his post, and... none of it. I can't... is it just me? :C I'd point out specific parts but it'd be the entire post almost. I can't follow it. Maybe I'm tired; it -is- almost midnight.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 03:30:14 AM
...
I'm about 30 seconds from heading off to sleep but
Cheez is not null anymore, and my policy is to lynch nulls.
are you a jester or something

also whoops didn't actually realize I was agreeing with Serela so much. Was I agreeing with Serela that much? w/e, sleepy time.

Cut but that doesn't matter because I'm going to sleep now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 03:33:37 AM
It's just going to be needlessly confusing and misleading for everyone, so I should probably go ahead and claim that me and Polaris' votes won't take effect unless we're voting the same person.

I wasn't sure if I should claim this immediately or not so I tried to vaguely ask Polly on the subject in an earlier post after Kilga brought it up, but the responses were vague.

No, I'm not going to comment any further on what may or may not be part of my role, because there is absolutely no reason for me to claim apart from the bit that directly involves everyone in terms of multiple people's votes working or not working and knowing why.

SORRY POLLY IF YOU WANTED TO HOLD BACK. But I figured all it would really do is confuse people and cause distractions.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 03:37:44 AM
And guys you really want scum to  quickend d1 right.

Validon can very well be killed before he can retaliate so there.

Have you ever thought that if scum decide to quicklynch Validon at this point........
................
........................................
................................
.........................it'll be really obvious and we can lynch them if that ever happens. Stop being so paranoid.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 03:42:57 AM
re: role shenanigans

(http://i.imgur.com/fb6Dd.gif)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 01, 2013, 03:55:28 AM
But I think I'd rather vote Dormio for his eagerness to vote me for noncontribution while I've stated I was about to make a post of it and then even showed some sign of apparently being in the middle of really getting it done.
The despair I experience when my hopes are crushed will be delicious.
I was right? Really? N-No way... That's just...
That's just amazing!
So this is despair!
This is so wonderful. I want to stain the world with this marvellous despair!

Let's try breaking down Serela's #131 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038543.html#msg1038543), shall we?
It's not looking all that promising when Serela opens with a complain about how his main focus is hard to read. He makes a case against Darkninjaabc's weird logic but backs off without actually doing anything. Brushing it off as Darkninja just being hard to read is pretty bad.
Serela also says that he finds Shadoweh to be suspect, but decides to ignore it given the game state at the time.
Finally, he seems to at least come to some kind of conclusion in regards to Sky Palladium, which is a start. But it's still worded ambiguously and it basically boils down to "the people voting for Sky Palladium are bad but Sky Palladium is bad too".
In other words, look at all the options Serela is opening up for himself so that he can hop onto any of these whenever he wants.

Now then, as for the actual part of the post where he makes a vote, I don't really understand the reasoning.
To me, it looks like nothing more than an OMGUS.
If you have something to say about this, post it Serela.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 01, 2013, 04:00:54 AM
I will speculate that if what Serela says is true, it's such a handicap I can't see it ever being given to a scum.  It is easily tested. 

Therefore, I submit that Serela and Polaris are town. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 04:05:07 AM
Quote
Brushing it off as Darkninja just being hard to read is pretty bad.
dude do you find that guy easy to read?

He was town last game and his play was a little easier to understand but I disagreed with pretty much the entire thing. Granted, he was also tunnelling on me for most of the game >_>

Shadoweh mostly making insignificant quips ends up being hard to really criticize because I can barely find anything to comment on either.

Originally I was thinking the people voting SkyPaladin were bad but then as I said, I reread his post and realized it actually was kinda meh. So I said nevermind, because I no longer thought they were bad. This should be clear. (If I was voting someone else, it'd probably be him, but that's really not saying much right now)

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 04:09:33 AM
(If you look closely, you can see that Serela's post is actually humorous because nobody is voting Sky Paladin anyway.)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 04:10:37 AM
Basically my opinion on Darkie is, most of the opinions he seems to have (including last game), I have difficulty even seeing where he's getting them, much less actually being able to tell if they're coming from a real townie or lying scumbag. I can't understand him and it makes it feel nigh-impossible to get some kind of alignment read on his slot.

I was getting close to voting him last game d2 for tunnelling and a questionable case on me made of vague fancy wording and some points I didn't agree with, but then he claimed cop and the strange case made more sense. Except it never stopped happening afterwords either and he was still town ;_;

cut by WAIT WHAT I thought like two people were voting him including you
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 04:13:14 AM
Oh. You unvoted and then voted Validon. `-`
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 04:19:47 AM
goin2bed
See you!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 04:24:29 AM
I also just realized Serela just switched his vote from Dormio to Dormio.

Serela you're not looking so good. If you really are my daiji na tomodachi then you should start shaping up. '^'
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 01, 2013, 04:24:46 AM
That's not right. 

You won't see me. 

I will be watching through the window of your mind and see the dreams unfold.  But you will not look back.  How could you?  There is no fourth wall for you.  Only darkness, and more stars. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 04:30:23 AM
So, Sky Palladium, whose nickname I have to admit is catching on despite being longer than your normal name. Since Dormio has posted again, do you have anything to update regarding your opinions of him?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 01, 2013, 04:39:11 AM
Kilga self-votes and gets no negative reaction? Not even an angry PM from Bard or nothin'. Sadface. :C (hey look Shadowy it's the lynch-me-please-face but don't actually lynch me kthx)

##Unvote
##Vote: Serela


About as lame-duck as Validon in terms of general content. My mind change is twofold; Serela's vote is half-incomprehensible, half-misrepresentation - "eagerness to vote me for noncontribution while I've stated I was about to make a post of it and then even showed some sign of apparently being in the middle of really getting it done" is straight-up rude, given (a) Dormio was changing his vote from his jokevote target to a serious target, and (b) Dormio had expressed irritation with Serela noncontribution before (not contributing in the past isn't magically erased from history by starting to write stuff in the present) - and his notes on Sky Paladin make little sense given Sky Paladin not only has a serious vote down now, but it's on the guy Serela's voting for (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/board,13.0.html). I don't know about other people, but when I'm town I try to pay attention to when people vote for the person I want to vote for, particularly if I'm going to say stuff about those people.

So near I can tell, Serela:

- Dislikes Dormio for deceitful reasons
- Dislikes Sky Paladin for incorrect reasons
- Dislikes Sky Paladin despite Sky Paladin voting for Dormio
- Maybe dislikes Darkninjalphabet possibly kinda? I can't tell.
- Dislikes PX for ??? reasons (I went back and checked the original post on this matter and am having the damnedest time parsing it
- Dislikes no one for legitimate reasons
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 01, 2013, 04:40:51 AM
At this stage, not really.  I am looking to see their response to my 'Serela is town' post.  I am curious as to why Serela totally ignored it though. 

I don't know why Palladium is catching on.  Maybe Iron Man made it cool because that's what his mystery...thing...is made of.  I think it's expensive? 

I think the water is too muddy right now to make any good calls.  The only bit of concrete evidence we've got is Serela and Polaris' mystery vote power.  I'm inclined to think you are both town, but maybe lovers or something, but if you were lovers, I would expect you could coordinate behind the scenes.  So I'm just gonna guess it's some other role I don't know about.  I'm a common or garden variety town pleb.  My special ability is to help people see in the dark. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 04:49:52 AM
^ Well that's disappointing.

Kilga, would you say Serela looks worse than Validon?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 01, 2013, 04:50:54 AM
Eh, I think the vote coordination thing could be inflicted on one-town-one-scum precisely because people will naturally assume anyone that has voting restrictions must be town. Also it's not 100% bad for scum since a townie would have a damaged vote as well. I wouldn't try to game the setup, especially with an unusual role effect being spotted this early into the game.

Cut by Polaris: Yes, because of the two extra major things I pointed out in my voteswitch post.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 04:56:48 AM
Wow I feel stupid. I overlooked the part where it was made very clear why you changed your vote >_> <_<

Maybe I should go to sleep too.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 01, 2013, 04:59:18 AM
Relinking the post where Sky Paladin votes for Dormio (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038489.html#msg1038489) because somehow I managed to link to the RPG index in that post instead. Whoops!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 05:03:51 AM
As for my own opinion on Serela, I'm somewhat annoyed because on one hand, we're tied together quite uselessly by role, yet on the other hand, Serela's play is just kind of poor.  As much as I'd like to think Serela is town, there is still the possibility that he is scum, so....

In the end I'm just being inconclusive. Sorry guys!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 05:34:23 AM
Half an hour of internet on computer. Hope I can actually help with my views.

I am temporarily dropping the case on Shadoweh due to a lack of convincing crumbs to actually lynch him. Which everyone had pointed out.

This doesn't mean I stop trusting my guts, having someone to jump out and defend you despite the person in question has not even made a response is pretty scummy, plus, the situation back then was basically me telling everyone to drop the wagon temporarily and give shadoweh time to response, having that cut off by someone else (cheez) is outright weird. Paranoid scum can explain that in the form of wanting to dispell more suspiction from forming round his scumpal when it is still so early with an apparant lack of material.
----------------------------------
In a nutshell, he's accusing me on the lack of more solid edvidence on the friggin start of D1 while denying what little edvidence I have as ''misinterpretion''?  And he just keeps poking at how he ''slight suspects'', ''rather suspects'' someone someone. Yet never bothered to actually vote to show a clear stance, until being reminded of that anyway. Then up until this point, he abruptly swapped modes and started voting generously. This drastic change on demand reads scum good enough.

Shadoweh never bothered to actually submit more information as well ever since suspicion around him is somewhat lifed.

------------------
And back to my policy of d1 scumhunting.
I guess some people are confused on why we should lynch nulls when we could.

Null reads are most likely town power roles
Right need to off now.

So basically this is the most acceptable time period to mislynch.
We should utilize this oppoturnity and clear out the nulls so town power roles can target the ones most suspcious.

comp queue seeya
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 05:45:23 AM
Well I personally think we should lynch the scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 05:52:51 AM
Right I managed to get in a comp again.

I mean null reads are most likely targets of town power roles.

So basically we can figure out which side the obvscum/obvtown actually swing just by communication. If they are actively contributing it is easy to differ and seprate the one from another by pure logic and analyzing their material.
And they cannot even choose to stay silent for their post times can and will give them away, forcing actual scum who falls in the ''obvious'' category to build upon more and more lies until eventuallly the fallacy will be so huge there's no doubt on who to lynch.

Null reads alone can toy with town psychology by just not posting or with minimal material. This gets even worse when scum keeps killing off the obvtown and leave us to deal with the nulls. Assume nulls are town, they simply cannot contribute and we don't know if to trust them. Assume nulls are scum, they can and will take up the leading role and spam all the wrong reads to make everyone follow. Basically if we start good by dwindling the suspicion pool it will help us later on.

Even if its a misfire we can deal with that if its now. imo to win we must at least mark out people whom we can trust. More the better. This is the entire reason why being suspcious and unable to either clarify worth more of a lynch than outright ''well i feel him scummy lets lynch him lol'' on d1.

I seriously do not believe either validon nor serela wagon will be scum. If anyone is actually to have a solid scumread from me its cheez. But his material is helping us atm, and I doubt if I have enough time to analyze more of his case now.

That said, I fully support lynching Serela, claim is weird and his way of sidetracking from what's the important thing (reads) in his posts goes :V . Scummier vibe.

##Vote Serela

And please remark how shadoweh has yet to make a sound and logical reply concerning his reads.

Fine session up anyway.

More later.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 07:40:59 AM
And this is a public apology to my lame posts before and after. If I were to contribute substantial material to this game it is necessary that I sacrifice a portion of its readability for efficiency. To abuse this and accuse someone as scum simply because their situation is simply not optimal for standbying 24/7 while triplechecking each and every post makes you an irritating person or irritating scum, with the latter being what I will assume on.

Yes in a nutshell I am frustrated over how obvscums just wagon on me and I am incapable of retailating asap due to actual technical difficulties in real life.


To compensate for your time I will at least state my read.

Null: polaris, kilga, serela, sb, px
somewhere inbetween; dormio, shadoweh
Obv: Cheez, Validon, me

These people are whom I have the strongest impression on and can recall from memory. Generally this process is helpful to identify nulls to cop as imho the most valuable information is mod info because reads will and always be off and biased. Therefore I find it suitable, although perhaps rage inducing to some that I keep pressing them for info. We need to see the wagon flip and see the people the flipped said wagon and deduce whos town whos scum, this also attributes to my so-called ''unpleasant attitude''  gamewise. Not that I care too much as long as it doesn't cause us to mislynch, we are playing to win.

There, all crumbs to my thought process, conclusion; fullclaim now serela.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 01, 2013, 07:49:36 AM
I would say something about how restricted voting is probably town but I'm the one who made a scum a Priest for that reason >.>
Maybe they're third party lovers and we should lynch them right away.
I'm not exactly beng super townie confirmed active but tbh I don't feel like taking my vote off of Darkninja, I'm not getting the huggie my friendo feelings I had last game.
Kilga, if you're scum it's okay if you tell me. It's not like I have vigs or the ability to bus kills onto you or anything. :>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: BT on November 01, 2013, 07:56:08 AM
Votecount 1.5

Serela (3): Dormio, Kilgamayan, Darkninjaabc
Validon (2): Polaris, SB, Cheez8
PX (1): CF7
SB (1): PX
Darkninjaabc (1): Shadoweh
Dormio (1): Sky_Paladin, Serela

Not Voting (1): Validon98

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in 46 hours.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)

Quote from: bars
CF7 - 652
PX - 598
Polaris - 487
Shadoweh - 452
Everyone else - 400
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 08:19:46 AM
Its not that we don't lynch the scum, but if we are only to base the lynch off our combined reads but no flips and roles and whatever. It is most likely going to be detrimental to town. Usually the more voiceful bunch will get the wagon in because more time exposed to the same argument every single time eventually twists town opinoin; its also how our brain works: by displacing memory. We are now allowed to wait for flips and night actions, let's just cut down on the nulls by communication and leave the rest to power roles.

And my vote on Serela is genuinely because I believe that he's scummy. To have voting restricted in a 12p setup? This means that we have only 8 townvotes, assuming theres three scums. I can hardly imagine he to be town less he has some bastardly powerful duo ability. Which he needs to clarify less we just lynch him. End of story.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 08:25:28 AM
btw my library session is up so long posts from me ends here. You might want to squeeze in something fast in like five minutes else you will have to endure a short and  brief reply on phone.

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 01, 2013, 08:29:57 AM
And my vote on Serela is genuinely because I believe that he's scummy. To have voting restricted in a 12p setup? This means that we have only 8 townvotes, assuming theres three scums. I can hardly imagine he to be town less he has some bastardly powerful duo ability. Which he needs to clarify less we just lynch him. End of story.
So you think having restricted vote makes him scum despite how scum would be more affected by this? He said both votes count, so we still have 9 votes in theory. We don't need him to claim whether he's uber or not. That's something the scum should be worried about.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on November 01, 2013, 09:29:34 AM
Sorryб i was too busy convincing everyone that i'm a townie while playing SK in other game. It's night there atm, so you have my undivided attention.
CF7,  if you think that Dormio is scummy for spamposting, why are you not voting him for it?
Because it's D1. And we have "post a lot of stuff or get out" rule. So for now it's ok.

Validon's #72 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038342.html#msg1038342)
Lots of somewhat empty accusations while at the same time
Of course, I'm not ready to vote on any of these. D1 has always been a "take things with a grain of salt" thing for me, seeing as it always seems we manage to lynch town instead of scum D1 over something silly or that appears to be scummy but really isn't.
##Unvote
Until there's more content to parse that's preferably not RVS-related stuff, I won't vote for anyone.
Blank unvote for the it's too early too vote seriously reason.. I'd say scummy.
Everything always happens while I'm asleep, zzz.  I guess it's my fault for living in the wrong hemisphere. 
You have no idea.
SO LETS GO WITH THE JOKE VOTES! 
I missed out on lynching CF7 last game so I want to get a shot this time. 
##unvote
## vote CF7

Does it make you all warm and fuzzy inside?
On a related note, I totally pushed for Shadoweh's death and I never got to kill them last game :/  Life is full of missed opportunities.  Maybe I should vote for Shadoweh instead.  Choices, choices.  But in my deepest darkest heart of hearts, I have to admit I don't have a reading either way and I'm just screwing around.  Sigh.
And this.
So. Joke vote, something about missing opportunities about previous game and self-confirmed "screwing around".
Not very townish.

Hm. Kilgamayan pointed the same thing about Validon.

Then Validon's #101 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038463.html#msg1038463)
Somehow he didn't say anything useful again and the whole post is pretty much just water. And not voting anyone.

Tbh, i'm not sure why people voting Serela, at least i don't read his posts as scummy. Also can someone point to me where it says that Serela confirms his voting restriction aside from votecounts?

And after reading Darkie i kind of understand people about my horrible logic. Because i'm not sure what he's talking about in his 153 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038590.html#msg1038590), 155 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038594.html#msg1038594) and 156 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038608.html#msg1038608).

So all in all. I thing i'll vote Sky_Paladin or Validon at this point after i reread.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 01, 2013, 09:59:08 AM
I'm back. Kind of. Maybe.
Whatever.

dude do you find that guy easy to read?
Hell no. But I'm not the one making a case against him.
As far as I'm concerned, I think he's trying pretty hard so it's all like whatever.

Anyway. There isn't really much more for me to say about Serela at this point so instead I'll look at some other stuff I guess.
Like, for example, CF7 who hasn't really done much of anything.
The post above mine (#162) is basically CF7's first post of the game and it does little more than mimic the words of others while setting him up to join the Validon wagon.
At least there's something about Sky Palladium in there.

As for the actual topic of Validon, I don't think I could really bring up anything that hasn't already been mentioned by everyone else and their mothers.

I guess I'll try to make another post soon or something but I'm feeling kind of unwell today.

Also, I was super confused about the bars for a while until I managed to figure out that 400 words was added every 24 hours instead of 72 after like 5 rereadings of the rules.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on November 01, 2013, 10:10:07 AM
Well beginning of the D1 was "people posting random shit about vegetables and fruits" and then nothing were happening for some time and i went to sleep. So yeah that was my first serious post.
Also i typed my post as i read the thread, there's nothing weird about my reactions being similar to others.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 10:11:07 AM
SB: Couldn't tell you why. I guess it's because his posts seem... well, very self-assured, if I'm being perfectly honest. Not sure why that would be something I distrust, except maybe it makes me feel like people are being played or distracted from certain parts of arguments because of it. I can't really support this very well though which is a sign that SB is very good at being scum and we should lynch him now! That, or I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely.

Dark: I want to think he's a misguided townie but he just doesn't stop.

How does my confidence distract people from arguments exactly?

What makes you think misguided townie?

I like how multiple people have fewer votes than names attached. FOR SCIENCE! ##Unvote, ##Vote: Kilgamayan

SB are you Carthrat in disguise ?_?

Was this just to test the votals?

Manix = a guy on SF who also has a Kirigiri avatar and makes a lot of short posts in succession, like Polly did.

Cheez is not null anymore, and my policy is to lynch nulls.

What? This doesn't make any sense. We don't even know if we have a Cop or a Vig or whatever to clean up the scummy people, for all we know our PRs could be made up of like, Doc and Empowerer or some stupid shit like that. We lynch scummy people to lynch the mafia, and so that the mafia has a harder time at *YLO, even if they flip town.

Note that my stance has never changed but just that there's no imminient risk of quickhammer I assume that its safe to Vote.

And guys you really want scum to  quickend d1 right.

Validon can very well be killed before he can retaliate so there.

I would rather lose a townie to a quickhammer if it means the scumteam out themselves for it. Why are you so conscious about a quickhammer anyway?

But I think I'd rather vote Dormio for his eagerness to vote me for noncontribution while I've stated I was about to make a post of it and then even showed some sign of apparently being in the middle of really getting it done.

This is a pretty bad vote reason and just looks like a thinly veiled OMGUS. The rest of the post is essentially spent on Serela talking about how he can't read Dark and nullreads. Same deal with Validon.

I think Serela/Polly being Maf/Maf is basically impossible, but Town/Maf or Town/Town are both possible so yeah. No use dwelling on it. Trying to game the setup probably won't work out well so yeah.

Quote
And back to my policy of d1 scumhunting.
I guess some people are confused on why we should lynch nulls when we could.

Null reads are most likely town power roles

i
what
you want us to lynch our PRs
ok
This doesn't mean I stop trusting my guts, having someone to jump out and defend you despite the person in question has not even made a response is pretty scummy, plus, the situation back then was basically me telling everyone to drop the wagon temporarily and give shadoweh time to response, having that cut off by someone else (cheez) is outright weird. Paranoid scum can explain that in the form of wanting to dispell more suspiction from forming round his scumpal when it is still so early with an apparant lack of material.

How does someone defending another player make the player they're defending scummy? Scum can buddy up to townies and townies can defend scum who they think are town. You're using this against Shadoweh when she has no control over what Cheez does and I don't like it.

I mean null reads are most likely targets of town power roles.

Null reads alone can toy with town psychology by just not posting or with minimal material.

Okay, no. The only type of role that would really consider targetting a nullread is an investigative role. The Doctor wants to be on his townreads. Theoretical Hooker wants to be on his scumreads. The vig wants to shoot scummy people. Inactives will get replaced or modkilled, there's no use dwelling on that now.

Vote is staying on Validon, I have no reason to see him as a townie right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 01, 2013, 11:22:16 AM
Was this just to test the votals?

Pretty much. Then Serela claimed the voting thing (here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038546.html#msg1038546), for CF7's reference) and that was that.

Darkninjalphabet: What about Serela's claim is "weird"? What makes it part of his voteworthiness?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 11:26:18 AM
Right. I was kind of confused about it when I woke up, but it made sense when I was reading back through.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 12:58:30 PM
To shadow: i am questioning the entire validity of his claim. Therefore i am assuming t on the premises that he is lying.

To kilga: i find the claim unbelivable for its lack of information. I can never trust even my own analysis if they are baseless. Therefore i would do anything if it means drawing out reaction such that i can see the full picture. Far as i know, town  generally dont want to lynch actively posting people d1 for determining their alignment gets piss easy once game drags. Look for direct contradictions anf voting / posting history. Done.

For the sake of being convincing let me quote an example last game; i wonder how many o fyou recall that i attacked hw after he replaced in? I think it was along the lines of "your psychology is scummy itself". Surprise as he turns out to br scum.

R

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 01:20:06 PM
Quote
But I'm not the one making a case against him.
Neither am I Dormio >_> Or does complete dismissal in "but anyway I have no idea how to read dark so, moving on" sound like I'm making a case why he's scum? I'm trying to say things at him in hopes he'll slowly get better!

Anyway, Darkie, stop hating me in all games forever because of claim shenanigans that aren't even true. People said you were going about it wrong last game, and you're going about it wrong this game.

Especially this game. My vote doesn't count. Polly's vote doesn't count. YOU CAN SEE THIS IN THE VOTECOUNT. Do you need me to prove that our votes do count when we use them together? We can't be scum using this as some kind of subterfuge unless the mod deemed it fit to actually give scum some wacked out role like this because you can't vote someone without your vote actually counting, normally.

I didn't fullclaim because why the fuck would I fullclaim? I claimed so people understand the -incredibly unusual and important fact- of two people's votes not functioning, and so no one gets caught up in trying to figure out why.

Anyway I literally just woke up so I didn't do much but skim the posts since I slept, yet.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 01:20:55 PM
Sadly I can't even vote Dark over this because last game proves he could very definitely be doing this as town.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 01:23:28 PM
Quote
How does someone defending another player make the player they're defending scummy? Scum can buddy up to townies and townies can defend scum who they think are town. You're using this against Shadoweh when she has no control over what Cheez does and I don't like it.
This so much
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 01:26:15 PM
Also yes I'm stupid and forgot about SkyPaladin's post where he voted Dormio and then somehow missed it in my several relooks over the thread (because, as only like page 3 through half of page 5 mattered, I did several times)

gonna go have breakfast and stuff so that I stop making little blip posts repeatedly
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 01:27:02 PM
3 through half of page 5 mattered, I did several times
through half of page 4*
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 01:30:01 PM
To shadow: i am questioning the entire validity of his claim. Therefore i am assuming t on the premises that he is lying.

It's displayed in the damn votals. It's pretty hard to not call that conclusive evidence. Moreover, what does Serela gain from fakeclaiming something like this? And since Polly's clearly in on this fakeclaim with him, do you think that he's scummy too?

Sadly I can't even vote Dark over this because last game proves he could very definitely be doing this as town.

Please no. You can't rely on meta for the sake of clearing people/ignoring their scumminess. Do you remember Town Mafia? Bad use of meta will cause town to lose games.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 01:33:40 PM
Fuck my post is lost damn the shitty back button

Basically sb i amtyping up a case onwhy you. Cheez and serela are scum

So sit there as i waste another 15 mimutes of my life doing exactly the same thing i just did
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 01:45:26 PM
Sheesh.
Darkie, I "defended" Shadoweh because I stated I didn't agree with your point of view and you specifically asked me to explain why in detail.
Serela, dang it, you really sound like you're not town but your role makes it sound like there's not much else for you to be. Make up your mind (or just mess up more.)
Also, a town/mafia setup for your two roles would be pretty cool and I kind of hope that's the case but even then it's not like I'm getting much of a read on Polly yet.
How does my confidence distract people from arguments exactly?

What makes you think misguided townie?
Mostly by implying "the part of this post that I'm focusing on is what's important to focus on, not the rest of the stuff." Like I said though, I have no idea why you worry me. As far as I know you could be focusing on the right things for the right reasons.

Darkie proved in the last game how a townie can act like this on broken logic. I'm fully aware that situations tend to repeat themselves from game to game without regard to alignments, but even then, it's a possibility I can't seem to shake. (Couldn't shake it reading through the last game either, so it definitely goes beyond "he's acted like this earlier".)

Cut by 5 serelas and some other people but urgh nothing changed except Serela said more things that don't sound trustworthy
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 01:57:48 PM
If you dont fullclaim you just stated out a fact which we would figure out at the end of d1. You yoursellf has been thrown with scum!dormio in the same fucking neighborhood and unless it says outright inyour pm you both are town it tells absolutely nothing about both your alignments. The thing that you arr actually bringing this up means that you are self concious of that your status is doubtfull. Sure by this logic polly might also be scum instead of you but why should we not lynch you who is running around telling us you arent scum becayse you said so? Wtf

Sb. In his wall post he went "its okay to lynch town if we out scum". This proc me to read him thoroughly over. The current situation and the oldness of the post you quote as reference and all thr associated things wrong with the statement "its ok to lynch town. You know full well a quickhammer can occur at l1, l2 and whatever while the only thing tracable is similar posting times. Basically you are never going to use this as ammo to lynch scum. Even if you resort ylto this argument it is still only going to be a small jab. Does that seriously justify a town wanting to lynch anothet town? No.

Then i came to analyze your posts. The majority of your so called contribution was basically nitpicking. You plant doubts which trail off to let us form ou rown conclusions with your directed questions with a dead end negative answer. Your stance is clear only  when you actually vote. I didnt notice whoever remarked you as being confident. But what i do persume from you is " stop being ao assertive and stereotyping people out". Inother words. Scum

Cheez is scum for reasons stated before but i didnt really have a read on others so its natural i accuse shadow to bring scum like sb on thrle table. Now fully convicnced this scumteam lovea bussing.

This is so annoying. Repeating what i typed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 02:10:37 PM
Quote
If you dont fullclaim you just stated out a fact which we would figure out at the end of d1.
A.There's no reason town should need to worry about it for that long. You said it yourself; you'd figure it out at the end of d1. So why bother waiting until then when people are going to get distracted with it?
B.It wouldn't be as obvious as you might think it is to realize the condition for the unworking votes is simply "use them together". Obvious things are not so obvious when you have no idea what they are. Also, surprising everyone at the end of the d1 with one wagon going up by 2 votes instead of none isn't a good thing to do >_>

I literally do not understand. Are you saying it's scummy I decided to tell town why me and Polly's votes aren't working? Because clearly keeping it a secret for no reason is super townie?
Quote
You yoursellf has been thrown with scum!dormio in the same fucking neighborhood
wat
what are you even talking about
Quote
and unless it says outright inyour pm you both are town it tells absolutely nothing about both your alignments.
so why does it make me scum then (unless you're talking about the dormio neighborhood thing which I don't understand)
Quote
The thing that you arr actually bringing this up means that you are self concious of that your status is doubtfull. Sure by this logic polly might also be scum instead of you but why should we not lynch you who is running around telling us you arent scum becayse you said so? Wtf
>And since you claimed why your vote doesn't work this makes you scum, because you wanted town to be more informed and it was harmless to do so
>Also because you said you aren't scum this means you're scum
?????????

Considering my vote on Dormio is literally stupid I guess SB is right that I really shouldn't let meta hold me back this much.
##vote Darkie
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 02:19:53 PM
Assertive. Though i have to clarify about my example was specifically from mirai nikki mafia. I was just catering to you to use that so you can perceive my view clearer because you yourself had firsthand experience in linked roles and its time to know that they dont imply anything.

And the entire reason i am asking you to fullclaim is because you read scummy enough for any lynch to go through its just that i want you to convince me otherwise. Fine if you dont appreciate theoffer.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 02:26:24 PM
you yourself had firsthand experience in linked roles and its time to know that they dont imply anything.
I never said they did.

But it's a pretty good point to bring up that Dormio was never part of my role >_> I was a mason with HW and later Dormio used role shenanigans to invade my QT.

Quote
And the entire reason i am asking you to fullclaim is because you read scummy enough for any lynch to go through its just that i want you to convince me otherwise. Fine if you dont appreciate theoffer.
Sorry but that's not how claims work. Not just one person, but a majority of the playerlist (aka, enough to secure a lynch) needs to actually want me lynched. And your reasoning for wanting me lynched is super ridiculous.

Anyway, in terms of trying to use my vote as an actual "So guys Darkie might be scum", I suppose there's how a Serela wagon suddenly started growing and he quickly jumped on for the most head-tilting reasoning known to mankind.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on November 01, 2013, 02:39:40 PM
Darkie. It seems you've forgotten that we're playing a somewhat rolemadness mafia. And it can has pretty weird things in it. Linking two people's votes in a way, that they don't work if not placed on the same player is not really weird. It might just be a gimmick that people have to work with. Their alignments don't have to be tied to each other. So all in all i'd say it's a null to their alignment. Polaris/Serela might be either of the 3. Both town, scum/town and both scum. Simple as that. So it's a null about Serela alignment at best. At least i won't use it as a definitive alignment indicator anyway.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 01, 2013, 02:49:53 PM
can we have mostly-vanilla mafia next
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 03:00:48 PM
But i am not using his claim as a major argument on serela. So even if there's the possibility he could be town despite that, his behavior at the end of the day doesnt justify him being town. I literally dont know where to start with serela because everything is wrong and its taxing to point all of them out. For the sake of my sanity i want him to just claim. It is much more reliable toverify his aligbment. I can only scumread him behavior wise. No more, no less.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 01, 2013, 03:07:45 PM
Oh God I'm so tired.  These 10:30 to 10:30 shifts are retarded.  At least there's a holiday on Monday. 

This is just a snap in comment - I hope to write more when I've had some wretched sleep. 

About Validon and Serela's vote (I think it was Validon?  Palidon?  Polaris!  I think?  Yes.  It was Polaris.).  I think it'd be too much of a give away for scum if they had this constraint.  I think there's a good chance for one scum and one town, though.  Or at the very least some kind of hostile town element...but...I thought that this setup didn't have bastard or third factions. 

I see there's a lot of people voting for Serela though so maybe I won't have to guess. 

About my joke vote earlier - I'm in the Australia/Japan/Not USA timezone.  You guys already had a whole day to screw around whereas I had just woken up.  We were still in the first 24 hours of day 1.  How was I supposed to know it was suddenly serious business?  In my previous games we started day1 after night1 so we had a happy trail of bodies to at least start discussion.  There wasn't such thing as a joke vote.  I didn't know what I was doing. 

My main concern right now with my blanket clear on Serela and Polaris is that if either of them turn out to be scum (or heaven forbid, both of them) it looks bad for me. 

I'm so tired. 

Let me do a sleep read. 

First: Cut by CF7.  I didn't think this was a rolemadness game.  At least for me, anyway.  I've literally got vanilla towny.  I can't do anything except vote and talk in thread during daytime. 

BT - This guy is totally suspicious imo. 

Darkninja - I just can't see how this guy could be scum.  He's typing massive walls of text with his iphone or something for crying out loud.  That amount of effort...if I was scum, I couldn't be bothered to do it.  I'm handwaving as "probably town because he is investing stupidly huge amounts of effort".  Somebody that is trying hard.  But he doesn't appear to be trying too hard or fake.  There are certainly points where I have gone WHAT or I don't agree but my overall feeling is that of an overzealous sheepdog that's smelled a wolf or maybe a fox or maybe some left over shepherds pie, but goddamit if you touch those sheep you are gonna lose an arm. 
Serela - I handwaved him as town because of the vote shennanigans.  I also feel he is coming under attack from a lot of people for no specific reason.  He is getting justifiably upset and frazzled.  Basically kind of like last game between CF7 and Dark, only now it's Serela and Dark.  And Cheese.  And lots of other people, actually.  Maybe I'm the only one who's not going after him. 
SB - I haven't seen enough out of SB to form an opinion yet. Last game this was the same and he turned out to be evil scums.  So much so that I am going to paint him as suspicious because he is too quiet. 
CF7 - I can't remember seeing anything of note, except for the cut.  I know he wrote something earlier and there was a minor tiff with Dark but no alarm bells for me. 
Cheez8 - This one feels try hard.  I feel like he is pushing hard and it doesn't feel right somehow.  At this point I could vote for them. 
Validon - Validon is quiet but he made a couple of posts, mostly to say I am suspicious or something.  Validon kind of sounds like paladin.  That's good I guess.  I mistook him for Polaris for 90% of the reads and I autohandwaved him because of it but now it's midnight and I'm too damn tired to go back and do it again. 
Dormio I voted for because of the PX/Dormio stand at the start.  Dormio is making a couple of pushes mostly against Shadoweh.  Actually I didn't see much of a response from Shadoweh so that was a surprise.  She was very vocal last game.  The main read I have on Dormio is from 'what Shadoweh is not doing'.  Dormio wrote a lot but I feel like it's to pad out the word count.  It is however in character and I am enjoying much of what they have to say.  I'm not feeling very confident of my vote on Dormio. 
PX, same as Dormio.  However I feel bad lynching the previous mod on day 1 so I'm not pushing for them.  Coincidentally I have a null read on PX except that they didn't write much. 
Kilg - Doesn't write much but I feel so far what they have written is good.  Also as they are a forum mod I figure they are a lot busier so I'm more willing to ignore some disappearance issues.  Kilg has been pretty consistent I think.  But I'm not sure either way.  They made a good point on Serela.  I think they are pretty rational.  Also I get the feeling Kilga would be an extremely good player so I hope they are not scum. 
Shadoweh - Where did they go?  After the last game I expected something more.  There's still a lot of phase left but I feel like I need to see some more presence from Shadoweh. 
Polaris - Aside from picking at me earlier maybe there was some other thing...I don't know.  I'm too tired.  I shouldn't have done this.  I handwave because of the vote thing, for now.  Lets hit post and see who else cut me. 

Right.  Point 20 of BT's first post.  "This game is closer to vanilla than role-madness. This is not bastard." I didn't copy paste just type from looking at.
Ok what next. 

I am a vegetable, not a fruit.  The blue faction is an 'assortment of fruit and vegetables' and the red faction is vegetables only, apparently. But it's just the name.  Mod said don't take role names seriously.  Maybe there is a tomato or something that isn't sure if it's a fruit or a vegetable.  I don't know.  bed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 03:28:41 PM
Sb. In his wall post he went "its okay to lynch town if we out scum". This proc me to read him thoroughly over. The current situation and the oldness of the post you quote as reference and all thr associated things wrong with the statement "its ok to lynch town. You know full well a quickhammer can occur at l1, l2 and whatever while the only thing tracable is similar posting times. Basically you are never going to use this as ammo to lynch scum.
Meanwhile, in post #57 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038266.html#msg1038266)...
This statement itself given the current game time is bizzare. D1 is the only time where town avtually has the most freedom in lynching for the game impact is relatively little. Aka skill and information revealed by flips can compensate for one or two power roles
Suspecting SB for holding the same sentiments you held earlier really doesn't help your case. At this point I really want to vote for you but... actually, no, I am voting for you.

##Unvote
##Vote: Darkie


Paladin, did somebody actually ask you to claim? Between this and the last thing you said about your role I'm pretty sure I know exactly what you're getting at, but I'm wondering why it's there.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 03:35:00 PM
Darkninja - I just can't see how this guy could be scum.  He's typing massive walls of text with his iphone or something for crying out loud.  That amount of effort...if I was scum, I couldn't be bothered to do it.  I'm handwaving as "probably town because he is investing stupidly huge amounts of effort".  Somebody that is trying hard.  But he doesn't appear to be trying too hard or fake.  There are certainly points where I have gone WHAT or I don't agree but my overall feeling is that of an overzealous sheepdog that's smelled a wolf or maybe a fox or maybe some left over shepherds pie, but goddamit if you touch those sheep you are gonna lose an arm. 
...Stop making me uncertain about this guy. I want to stop being wishy-washy, dang it!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 03:42:50 PM
My sentiment is that we should lynch the nulls. Because reads are biased.
This is if i recall correctly the second time you just throw a vote at me with an empty accusation.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 01, 2013, 03:44:40 PM
Votecount 1.6

Serela (3): Dormio, Kilgamayan, Darkninjaabc
Validon (1): Polaris, SB
PX (1): CF7
SB (1): PX
Darkninjaabc (2): Shadoweh, Serela, Cheez8
Dormio (1): Sky_Paladin

Not Voting (1): Validon98

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in 46 hours.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)

You have just over 1 day and 14 hours remaining.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 03:59:06 PM
My sentiment is that we should lynch the nulls. Because reads are biased.
This is if i recall correctly the second time you just throw a vote at me with an empty accusation.
I have plenty of smaller issues with you that have been building up and making me suspect you. This is just the one that finally convinced me you really aren't working towards the town's benefit.

Besides, there are so many things wrong with your argument. For one, if there is somebody sending out scumreads left and right, and they have a high chance of being scum, what logic is there in voting for a null read instead? On top of that, it seems like you're treating null reads as a completely separate alignment from town and scum. Let me let you in on a little secret: Most players, even if they're null reads, are either town-aligned or mafia-aligned. Lynching a null read does NOT mean we are avoiding lynching a townie, in fact, the chance that a null-read player is the same as ever, and they might even have a power role.

There is no difference between wanting to lynch a person on day 1, like SB said, and lynching a person we can't get a read on, like you're saying. Both have a pretty darn good chance to be a townie and there's nothing ruling out the possibility that a player with a useful ability will have a null read. Thank you for reconfirming my confidence in my vote.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 04:01:46 PM
Besides, there are so many things wrong with your argument.
...Make that "arguments". Two things is not a lot.  :derp:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 04:05:17 PM
...in fact, the chance that a null-read player is a townie is the same as ever
sigh
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on November 01, 2013, 04:07:15 PM
My sentiment is that we should lynch the nulls. Because reads are biased.
Sorry, i don't buy it. I'm reading people as null, so let's lynch them. Plus i don't trust my own reads. What kind of mentality is that? On top of your Serela argument, your overall behavior was really not town. So.
##Unvote.
##Vote Darkninjaabc
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 04:29:31 PM
Right. This is ridiculous.

The entire point of flips is to reveal actually trustworthy info which we can use.
I told everyone my lynch priority because the fact that town should vite scum is fucking obvious. But i announced my policy at the point which there was consoiderably less material to determine a scum and/or a lych target.

That thing was ancient and doesnt fit in the current scenario. Just because i cannot possibly include every fucjing obvious factor in my logic you handwave it. Wtf scum. I clearly announced my intention and stance and reason for voting serela.

 Your wannabe rebuttals just involve nitpicking small insignificant details which we should have a consent on. Things like null reads can be eitger side used as an accusation? As if this doesnt scteam enough scumminess against someone. Its just bloody obvious. Null reads of course can be either side but we cannot bear the risk of misfire lategame

Scum are the only people with thia mentality to keep nitpicking on details. It gives them anexcuse to gandwave every single big idea of anu argument easily as long as town doesnt point out how inana and tunnel visioned such rebuttals are. Just because everyone here has a life and wont waste time elaborating  the obvious doesnt make me scum. So stop diverting aytention from your cumbuddy.

You know what you actually are the one whom i have the strongeat acumvibe on but just isnt voting due to how obviously biased i might be. I would seriously appreciate if you can crumb for handwaving all our big  ideas and nitpicking on the obvious details.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 04:32:43 PM
Oh. And i am the Peachy Peach. The rolecop. My ability fails if any other ability is used on the person i target
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 04:36:03 PM
Oh. And i am the Peachy Peach. The Roleclop. My ability fails if any other ability is used on the person i target

Made that rolecop
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 04:39:36 PM
Damn why cant it jus tcome out as rolecop
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on November 01, 2013, 04:46:36 PM
Okay, I looked through, thought long and hard, and here's my list of people who I am suspicious of.

PX- Mainly because I want to see something from him about really ANYTHING that's happened and I haven't seen anything yet.

Shadoweh- She's just been quiet... too quiet. I'm only suspicious for a similar reason as for PX, but it's not as strong as other things.

Dark- Where do I begin on this? He started out just being really tryhard coming up null. Then there was his whole argument on Cheez, which was just really urgh and #130 in particular just ignites all sorts of angry feelings, particularly the "my policy is to lynch nulls" part. No, you should be trying to lynch scum if they make themselves obvious. The second half of #153 trying to justify his null lynching policy isn't particularly good either. There's tryhard and then there's that. His argument on Shadoweh is also not particualrly good (I rmemeber him mentioning him saying Shadoweh agreed with a no lynch... when there was absolutely no evidence that she was doing so). Same with with his argument on Serela and on the whole situation with Serela and Polaris's conjoined vote thing. Every post he's made just makes me more and more angry at him. His claim is something that makes me waver a bit, but not too much. My vote is on him for now.

##Vote: Darkninjaabc

One other thing I will mention, because no one else has I believe, is that the Serela/Polaris thing comes across as null at the moment. While they can be scum, I lean more towards ITP/town with a thing like that. I would only vote for them if there is evidence that at the very least they are ITP if not scum, and currently I don't have a solid feeling on that.
Also I'll be busy later today with homework and stuff but I'll be back to look if anything new shows up.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 04:47:33 PM
...Oh, I get it. You think that if everybody votes for somebody who there's already an established opinion on, it'll make it harder to tell which of the people who did/didn't vote were scum who were/weren't swayed by popular opinion... or something. Am I right? Sorry if I'm not, but I've seriously been having trouble understanding you here.

Still though, townies are generally more comfortable voting for people they think are probably scum than people they're not sure of. Scum are a lot less comfortable voting for their own than they are voting for anyone else.

Also I'm pretty sure Day 1 is Day 1 no matter what.

Regardless, I guess you have a point about my rebuttals nitpicking all over the place since that's actually what this one is doing now that I think about it. Let's set that aside and get to the real reason I'm voting for you, huh? Among other things, you keep finding reasons to be suspicious of people that I don't agree with, and one of the most recent reasons was using an argument that you yourself employed much earlier in the day. This leads me to believe that you're suspecting people simply because you need to find reasons to suspect people whenever you can, and...

...wait, that's not a scumtell. That's what I'm doing too.


I can't believe I just now noticed this. Alright I'll go reconsider. I GUESS.

Also I'm not entirely sure what you mean by asking me to crumb. That's one of the phrases you guys are using that I still haven't fully grasped the meaning of yet. (Please do not interpret this line as an argument against you.)

Cut by Validon but I kinda used up all the time I have at the moment whoops
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 04:49:20 PM
i think something is seriously wrong with myphone.

Anyway and i realized getting mad at 2 leading a push with another justchiming on wont help.

Nullrread thing is still my policy if we dont have an aim. But now that we actually see scumtells i dont see how grappling against an out of context argument work towarda pointing me as scum.. please clarify.

And i will have to sleep soon so i am just dropping my stuff while i can.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 01, 2013, 05:02:39 PM
Votecount 1.65

Serela (3): Dormio, Kilgamayan, Darkninjaabc
Validon (1): Polaris, SB
SB (1): PX
Darkninjaabc (4): Shadoweh, Serela, Cheez8, CF7, Validon98
Dormio (1): Sky_Paladin

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline can be found below.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 05:07:32 PM
.......

Right if this isnt a scumtell what is it.
To address the accusations on me. The same logic doesnt work anywhere anytime. Stopit.

I used that null read argument because there was no solid scumreada back then. Now we do. But my stance to prioritize nulls as lynchee stands if the context fits. I havebeen rephrasing the same thing over and over again.

I kinda appreciate your effort cheez but the slip is obvious enough.
Using nitpicking arguments to advocate a push is solid acumtell.

##Vote Cheez8



Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 01, 2013, 05:18:33 PM
Vote: SB

Guys, he's silently pushing for Dark, all without giving a read or vote on him, while keeping his vote on Validon. Hell, even his vote on Validon (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038478.html#msg1038478) is pretty damn fishy, as he says why me over Serela. His sights are set on pretty much the 3 easiest wagons he can probably find, and he's in prime position to switch to any of them.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 01, 2013, 05:23:54 PM
Oh right Dark, you're not going crazy it's a global word filter that's been going on for years
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 01, 2013, 05:25:41 PM
And everybody voting dark right now, please do something better with your vote
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 01, 2013, 05:28:35 PM
I'm not home right now, I'll be back in about 5 hours after work to look at what's going on.
I did see that Dark claimed roleclop though so
##Unvote
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 01, 2013, 05:30:54 PM
As for my proper opinions upon the likes of everybody else, I would have to go with that they are either residing the thin line between ripe and rotten, or ripe of the sweetest kind, or just simple waiting to bud so that I can determine if they shall grow to be ripe or rot on the branch. Also, work for 7 hours cya.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 01, 2013, 05:51:16 PM
The back button ate up the ppsost i have been worling on for 45 minutes.

Look maybe its alright you guys lynch me i amliterally raging mad. Partially over how scum is at ease pushing the wagon onthe obvtown with aching bad cases. And how i literally canot format anything else riak hitting the back button or home menu.

Lets keep it simple. You disagree with my arguments. Whatever. I doubt them myself if i read them because of its low readability. I want to quote things bu tthat alone takes five minutes. Even this really simple rebuttal here took me an hour factoring in all the time i lost in my swalloed posts . There has never been any doubt on my arguments idea though. Nullreads definition can inclyde townie obviously. To associate that with ltnchimg townies to b publicly announced by scum is retarded. Scumteam is behind helping cheez to poke through the unimportant a spectsof my argument and laughing at how easily town just bought their theory of "well there must be a super retarded scum who cried he would kill everyone in front of them!"

And then nobody actually quesrioned if logic works that way.
Nitpicking argumenta have been addressed by the very writer. And that ha sbeen retracted as fast as he came up with his shaky argument. Contradictory stance is a bigger scumtell any day of the week.


Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 01, 2013, 06:11:47 PM
General tips to not lose posts: Hit the preview button. A lot. So if you accidentally hit back, hit forward and it'll go to your last preview.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 06:15:44 PM
Urgh. Yeah, no matter how I look at it I really don't see Darkie being scum. For real this time. Scum do more than just use flawed arguments, and... well, he's done more, but it doesn't really overcome what supports him being town.

##Unvote

I probably could benefit from taking this a little less seriously. I feel bad about going so far back and forth about Darkie too since that's probably misleading for everyone. Well, here are the hunches I have, at any rate, even though I can't support most of them:

Darkie- Even though he's wrong, I have very little doubt that he's town.
Kilga- Bad vibes. Not sure why.
SB- Same bad vibes as Kilga.
Dormio- I still suspect him.

That's kind of it for now.

##Vote Cheez8
Suit yourself.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 06:23:08 PM
...laughing at how easily town just bought their theory of "well there must be a super retarded scum who cried he would kill everyone in front of them!"
...
Contradictory stance is a bigger scumtell any day of the week.
for the record, a contradictory stance is more or less the real reason I suspected you, not that first one
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 06:42:55 PM
Mostly by implying "the part of this post that I'm focusing on is what's important to focus on, not the rest of the stuff." Like I said though, I have no idea why you worry me. As far as I know you could be focusing on the right things for the right reasons.

Darkie proved in the last game how a townie can act like this on broken logic. I'm fully aware that situations tend to repeat themselves from game to game without regard to alignments, but even then, it's a possibility I can't seem to shake. (Couldn't shake it reading through the last game either, so it definitely goes beyond "he's acted like this earlier".)

I focus on the parts I think are important, yeah. I'm not going to babble on about stuff I think is null.

If it's a regardless of alignment thing, shouldn't it be null?

Sb. In his wall post he went "its okay to lynch town if we out scum". This proc me to read him thoroughly over. The current situation and the oldness of the post you quote as reference and all thr associated things wrong with the statement "its ok to lynch town. You know full well a quickhammer can occur at l1, l2 and whatever while the only thing tracable is similar posting times. Basically you are never going to use this as ammo to lynch scum. Even if you resort ylto this argument it is still only going to be a small jab. Does that seriously justify a town wanting to lynch anothet town? No.

Then i came to analyze your posts. The majority of your so called contribution was basically nitpicking. You plant doubts which trail off to let us form ou rown conclusions with your directed questions with a dead end negative answer. Your stance is clear only  when you actually vote. I didnt notice whoever remarked you as being confident. But what i do persume from you is " stop being ao assertive and stereotyping people out". Inother words. Scum

1.) All I can say is that if lynching a townie confirms another player as scum and we have the capabilities to do something ABOUT that scum (you know, lynching them) then in my mind it's always worth it. We're here to lynch the mafia, and if there's one townie or twenty alive at the end it's still a victory. If a player quickhammers without good reason they're naturally going to be suspicious, especially if it's on a claimed PR. I'd sac the doc for a dead maf any day. All this comes down to is people being too cautious with their votes anyway.
2.) Hello, welcome to my playstyle. I don't really know what else to say at the first part, I'll focus on stuff that makes me suspicious and won't say things about stuff I don't really deem as important. Also my "planting doubts" is me questioning people to help develop reads/push my suspicions. I'm not going to stop being assertive, if I think someone is scum I'm going to push on them. And what does "stereotyping people out" even mean?

Serela's claiming is null and has no scum intent at all. It's not worth discussing.

Gotta run to McDonalds. Will post again when I get back.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 09:01:30 PM
Wow, these sort of Day Ones are more interesting than I thought. Harder, too. I've gone back through the thread a couple times and there's not much I can conclude. All of Kilga's posts, most of SB's posts and some of Darkie's posts make me think "scum", and several of Serela's posts and Darkie's posts make me think "town". That's more or less the limit to what I can gather, at least without a little bit more information. I don't really think I was right in suspecting Dormio anymore, and Paladin is still hard to read but I'm more inclined to see him as town right now. Shadoweh isn't contributing nearly as much as others are (probably less than Validon, though without as many words to show for it) and that has me a little worried.

I have no idea when I'm going to stop going back and forth on everybody in the entire game like this, but I know that at least SOME of these opinions are worth mentioning.

I guess I'll just be vaguely suspicious of Kilga for the time being. Kind of glad to see Darkie's not voting for a null read anymore.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 09:53:49 PM
SB - I haven't seen enough out of SB to form an opinion yet. Last game this was the same and he turned out to be evil scums.  So much so that I am going to paint him as suspicious because he is too quiet. 

I've posted more on game content than a lot of people, so I'm not sure how you can call me the only one who's scummy for it, considering you're nullreading other quiet people like PX too.

Quote
  Cheez8 - This one feels try hard.  I feel like he is pushing hard and it doesn't feel right somehow.  At this point I could vote for them. 

Any idea why you feel this way about him?

Not particularly fond of a listpost like that in general if the majority of the reads they give are null. Plus if you're not feeling confident in your Dormio vote, why is it still on him when you apparently find other people suspicious?

My sentiment is that we should lynch the nulls. Because reads are biased.
This is if i recall correctly the second time you just throw a vote at me with an empty accusation.

Of course reads are going to be biased, and it's never stopped anyone before. And no, it wasn't an empty accusation, I actually thought it was a decent one and you just handwaving it like that does NOT make me feel good about you.

For one, if there is somebody sending out scumreads left and right, and they have a high chance of being scum,

Agree with a lot of the post, but having multiple scumreads isn't scummy. It can just be town paranoia or just because everyone in the game has scummy play to an extent.

Right. This is ridiculous.

The entire point of flips is to reveal actually trustworthy info which we can use.
I told everyone my lynch priority because the fact that town should vite scum is fucking obvious. But i announced my policy at the point which there was consoiderably less material to determine a scum and/or a lych target.

That thing was ancient and doesnt fit in the current scenario. Just because i cannot possibly include every fucjing obvious factor in my logic you handwave it. Wtf scum. I clearly announced my intention and stance and reason for voting serela.

 Your wannabe rebuttals just involve nitpicking small insignificant details which we should have a consent on. Things like null reads can be eitger side used as an accusation? As if this doesnt scteam enough scumminess against someone. Its just bloody obvious. Null reads of course can be either side but we cannot bear the risk of misfire lategame

Scum are the only people with thia mentality to keep nitpicking on details. It gives them anexcuse to gandwave every single big idea of anu argument easily as long as town doesnt point out how inana and tunnel visioned such rebuttals are. Just because everyone here has a life and wont waste time elaborating  the obvious doesnt make me scum. So stop diverting aytention from your cumbuddy.

You know what you actually are the one whom i have the strongeat acumvibe on but just isnt voting due to how obviously biased i might be. I would seriously appreciate if you can crumb for handwaving all our big  ideas and nitpicking on the obvious details.

Yes, we use lynches flips to work out where we are. If we lynch someone and there was another player pushing really hard for their lynch or hard defending them, then we get associative reads. Do we get this from a player who everyone was nullreading and they flip town? No, we don't get anything from their flip. You're saying "that thing was ancient" but that doesn't mean that it didn't happen. Townies will also pick apart arguments that they don't like and call people scum for them. As the game progresses you get a better read on the nulls and can figure out of they're townie or scummy. Being biased towards someone being scum does NOT MEAN YOU SHOULDN'T VOTE THEM. That is the worst reasoning I've ever heard.

Also your out of nowhere claim does not make me feel any better about you.

Vote: SB

Guys, he's silently pushing for Dark, all without giving a read or vote on him, while keeping his vote on Validon. Hell, even his vote on Validon (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038478.html#msg1038478) is pretty damn fishy, as he says why me over Serela. His sights are set on pretty much the 3 easiest wagons he can probably find, and he's in prime position to switch to any of them.

Hi PX, thanks for voting me again. Even though your vote was still on me. Anyway, I wouldn't say I'm exactly being subtle with my Dark push considering that I have actually explicitly said that I found him scummy earlier and continued to push on him up till now. And yeah, I have more than one scumread, that isn't a scumtell you know. Also you're missing the main point of my Validon vote that he had absolutely no content about how he felt about the rest of the playerlist. I said "why me and Dormio" because it was hypocritical to not be suspicious of someone who's doing the same thing that you're calling other players out on, and there was also the part of the Kilga analysis to my vote. So that's a complete misrep there. What are your other reads by the way?

WRT to Cheez's suspicions on me, suspicions I can't refute at all are kind of lame, but I'd like to see if you can figure out why in future.

Scumreads are Dark, Serela, Validon and PX right now. Dark's getting worse, Validon and Serela are slightly better. My PX suspicion is ONE POST STONG so I need more on him but I don't like what he has. Have a couple of townreads and a bunch of nulls too.

##Unvote
##Vote: Dark

Don't really care about his claim, I think he's maf.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 01, 2013, 10:01:18 PM
Votecount 1.7

Serela (2): Dormio, Kilgamayan,
Validon98 (0): Polaris
SB (1): PX
Darkninjaabc (3): Serela, CF7, Validon98; SB
Dormio (1): Sky_Paladin
Cheez8 (1): Darkninjaabc

Not Voting (2): Shadoweh; Cheez8

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline can be found below.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 10:26:21 PM
WRT to Cheez's suspicions on me, suspicions I can't refute at all are kind of lame, but I'd like to see if you can figure out why in future.
...Dern acronyms. Mind if I ask what that one means?  :V

And yeah, I would too. I have to say they're fading a little bit with that post, but they're not gone yet.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 01, 2013, 10:27:14 PM
with regards to
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 01, 2013, 10:30:14 PM
Well, as per usual, a bunch of stuff happened while I was asleep.

Anyway, at this point, I think it's prudent for me to comment a little bit in regards to whatever is happening with Darkninjaabc right now.
I mean, make no mistake, I think that whatever he's spouting doesn't really make any sense.
However, I don't necessarily think that this makes him scum.
I mean, remember, as much as I would like this to be the case since it would make playing mafia so much easier; bad play does not equate to scummy play.
In my opinion, it still looks to me like he's trying to find scum in his own ~special~ way.

Instead, I think we should look a bit more at Serela together.
First of all, there's what I said regarding him being useless and providing no commentary on ongoing events other than "this is hard" earlier in the day.
And then there's Kilga's post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038573.html#msg1038573) that outlines some of the things that are wrong with Serela's posts when he finally actually posts something of some significance.
And then, let's look at Serela's current activity.
He literally still has 0 scumreads. I mean, come on.
We've already gone over his vote on me, but look at his vote on Darkninjaabc (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038699.html#msg1038699).
Like he asks Darkninjaabc why his shitlogic makes himself scum, but at the same time Serela doesn't actually provide any reasons for Darkninjaabc being scum other than using bad logic.
Fortunately, Serela does address this here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038705.html#msg1038705), but I'm still left wondering.
Also, Serela, do you have any other explanation for your vote on me other than ~derp~?

Also, where was it said that this game is role madness?
Since people seem to be mentioning this or something.

Whatever, I'm going to go look for food and reorganize my thoughts once I'm done eating.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 11:11:26 PM
The opening post says the game is closer to vanilla in the vanilla-rolemadness scale. Pay attention you guys :(

I only skimmed the last couple of pages since it looked like the discussion was going in circles, but let me try reading again to see what the hell is going on.

I am mildly interested in seeing a claim from Serela, though. For comparison purposes.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 01, 2013, 11:40:27 PM
WRT to Cheez's suspicions on me, suspicions I can't refute at all are kind of lame, but I'd like to see if you can figure out why in future.
Well, thinking about it more... The best I could come up with is that your posts all seemed like they made a lot of sense and I had to remind myself to take everything with a grain of salt more frequently when I was reading your posts.

...Yeah, I know. Sometimes I have a bit of trouble parsing my own thoughts. Guess you're back to null now.

On the other hand, I'm fine with still suspecting Kilga. I'm pretty sure the reason I got bad vibes from him was because aside from clearing up smaller matters, his posts have mainly been him suspecting or voting for people because of how they have been posting without contributing, and how they only either gave null reads or agreed/disagreed with established opinions. Yeah, that's a (somewhat) legitimate concern, but it feels strange that he's hardly even acknowledging any others, especially when there were so many people who hadn't contributed much.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 01, 2013, 11:48:12 PM
If there's one thing I learned from past games, it's that mafia is not to be played purely on logic because human beings aren't embodiments of pure logic. ::) Darkninja is being noisy and distracting and I don't want to deal with him right now.

Validon is marginally better than he was before, but it's super easy to not like Darkninja so I'm feeling a bit iffy. Null leaning scum, but I would like to see more posts with cases that are a bit stronger.

Shadoweh I hope you can start being super town extraordinaire because right now you are being super scummy. `_` The only posts you've made are pointless remarks that don't really tell us who your scum reads are. Serela is pretty much on the same level, but I'd say Shadoweh actually looks worse at this point. Isn't it sad, Shadoweh?

Would also like to see PX talk about more people than just SB. As far as I know he's just tunneling, which is scummy ::)

##Unvote
##Vote Shadoweh


I'm ok with lynching Shadoweh at her current level unless she comes back with a Shadowehite and Mega Evolves into someone who will start doing things. A lesser option would be Serela. Validon, Darkninja, and PX are kind of in the nebulous zone.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 01, 2013, 11:56:04 PM
Really unhappy with the DNA - my totally cool and original new nickname for Darkninjalphabet - wagon. (Oh hey, Serela and Validon, fancy meeting you two here!) The guy is painfully town. This train is so bad I don't even like how Shadowy unvoted because it wasn't emphatic enough. It's basically a ton of people pointing at unusual and wrong things and acting all incredulous with no one but Cheez making any sort of effort to explain why his behavior is scummy instead of the behavior of an overeager newbie with ideas that are radically different from the norm. I'm reading through Validon's post in particular and finding a list of things that DNA did, sometimes accompanied by why they're wrong, never accompanied with "this is scummy because ______." It blends well with his namedropping PX and Shadowy as suspicious without really explaining why they're scummy. This would be voteswitch worthy EXCEPT

Serela's justification for his new vote uses the term "headtilting," a nice fancy word that isn't synonymous with "scummy" and doesn't explain why DNA's behavior is scum behavior, instead of "scummy". Headtilting things are not scummy things. This is still a lack of proper hunting, and now it has the added bonus of falling right in line with Shadowy's Guide To Scum Serela's Accusational Vocabulary. I am similarly unimpressed at the excuse for not commenting on Paladin's Dormio vote. "Whoops I missed this vote for the guy I'm voting for from another guy I'm suspicious of" is a whole boatload of no.

Can newbies please stop roleclaiming unless made necessary by being at L-1? Thanks. I feel spacewastey talking about this at all but this game is loaded with new/inexperienced people and two of them have already jumped the gun, so.

Shadoweh - Where did they go?  After the last game I expected something more.

YOU HEAR THAT SHADOWY YOU HAVE A REPUTATION TO UPHOLD

but it feels strange that he's hardly even acknowledging any others, especially when there were so many people who hadn't contributed much.

1) I nevere talk about everyone on Day 1 because it's useless noise.
2) Serela and Validon look like they're trying the hardest to look contributory without actually being contributory. I'm not going to yell at, say, PX for being not contributory when it's because he plain isn't here.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 12:35:29 AM
For a game that's more on the vanilla side there sure are alot of weird caveats to the claimed roles.
For people talking bout how I up and disappeared, maybe you should look at the names a little higher on the list. >_> Why were people yelling about how I disappeared while ignoring the proof of who else really wasn't here?
I don't know why I have a reputation from last thread considering I was lost and only knew Zakeri was scum in my heart.

Kilga: I probbaly missed whatever made you hate his wagon so much. One second while I review Serela. I was planning to just say today 'weird voting role seems town' and leave it at that.
HOLY SHIT SERELA SWORE AT SOMEONE this is a momentous occasion. :ohdear: Serela, are you well? Do you need a hug? \o.o/ Unless Dark is scum with Serela I don't think it's in Serela's power to get legit mad at a townie.. or anyone for that matter. The post after about the headtilting is a little scummy, but #169 earns a tentative Shadoweh sticker of approval. I supose he could be scum who's legit mad this guy is tunneling him from last game, but again it's not like Serela to do that.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 12:39:42 AM
Shadoweh I hope you can start being super town extraordinaire because right now you are being super scummy. `_` The only posts you've made are pointless remarks that don't really tell us who your scum reads are. Serela is pretty much on the same level, but I'd say Shadoweh actually looks worse at this point. Isn't it sad, Shadoweh?
I might evolve if you bring me a Fire Stone. It's so cold in here I feel like I'm going into hibernation. I might see if I can buy a space heater which should improve my townie performance. It'd be funny if I weren't serious. I don't think I've been stellar either so I don't blame you for calling me out.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 12:55:18 AM
I hate the wagon because it's full of people pointing at what DNA has said and drawing the conclusion that because it's wrong, DNA is scum. I covered Serela and Validon already, and I have no clue why CF7 thinks DNA is scummy. Even SB is guilty of it to a degree. This is compounded by the fact that I think DNA is one of the towniest players in the game so far with how much effort and faith he's putting into incredibly unpopular opinions.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 02, 2013, 01:01:18 AM
What's that?  Sky has a half hour spare and has had plenty of sleep?  That's right, friends!  It's ISO time! 

Serela:
My main concern with Serela is that, in response to DNA's (great acronym, Kilga) attacks, Serela countervoted DNA instead of going for a specific scum target.  Secondly is the role shenanigans.  I am assuming that a highly visible role, such as conditional vote power, is not going to be given to the scum team.  I also assume they are not lovers or they would be able to communicate privately (right?) and therefore coordinate their actions better.  Right now it just looks like they are more of a sibling rivalry kind of thing, in which case, there IS a good chance one is a scum.  Is there a sibling rivalry type role?  I really haven't heard of one.  It's just the thought that came to my mind.  At this time I am clearing Serela (and Polaris) because I am operating on the assumption that the role is not likely to be a scum role.  However, I could see it's valuable to flip Serela to see their role and make a decision about Polaris because of it.  However, there's an equal chance that it's a useful town rule that we should hang on to, and that scum will hit them anyway overnight.  So I would be prepared to Serela/Polaris until day 2 at least. 
Overall Serela hasn't posted much content but they have been alive and active so there's been plenty of material for people to get readings on. 

Serious Bananas:
My main concern is that prior to page 8, SB had made ZERO posts with actual content.  He had taken almost a "Lets explain things to the simpletons" approach.  I don't think he is readily contributing and only seems to post to poke holes in somebody else's argument, or defend themselves.  Most of the content is quoting other people and making small remarks/rebuttals.  But I can't see anything that SB is bringing to the table.  He is ripe for the culling imo. 

CF7: 
If Ithought SB was bad, CF7 is even worse.  He has posted a few times but I didn't see a single analysis or constructive post.  There was one rebuttal for my vote on him, and that's it. 

Shadoweh:
And if I thought CF7 was worse, Shadoweh is just horrible.  They have also posted zero content posts, and largely made no effort to even defend themselves.  This is such a massive difference from their previous game.  It's a big red flag for me. 

Starstarstar~~

Cheez8 has posted a lot and nobody else seems worried, so.  I'll be cancelling my vote.  Also, this:

Cheez8
Quote
Paladin, did somebody actually ask you to claim? Between this and the last thing you said about your role I'm pretty sure I know exactly what you're getting at, but I'm wondering why it's there.

Nobody asked me to claim.  It didn't occur to me that claiming vanilla town was in fact claiming.  I was under the impression that most players were vanilla town so saying "I'm vanilla town" didn't have any meaning.  Apparently it seems I am the rare, actually vanilla town.  How sad. 

At the moment, CF7, SB and Shadoweh are my scum picks.  Which is ironic, because I first voted for Dormio because of their vote for Shadoweh.  Perhaps they are just ahead of their time.  Nevertheless, I'm going to go with Kilg's opinion, because when I ISO'd them, I'm impressed with the logic and attention to detail.  Man, I hope you are town because I sense an unusual ability to see through bullshit. 

##Unvote
##Vote SB
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 01:05:40 AM
What do you think of SB, Kilga? I agree with PX's point that his Validon vote isn't good, espcially the why me and not Serela part.

Sky: Where did Kilga say he thought SB was worse then me? If you mean the post right before yours, I'd say he sounds harder on CF7 then SB. (maybe I'm missing something obvious he said earlier)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 01:07:21 AM
Nobody asked me to claim.  It didn't occur to me that claiming vanilla town was in fact claiming.  I was under the impression that most players were vanilla town so saying "I'm vanilla town" didn't have any meaning.  Apparently it seems I am the rare, actually vanilla town.  How sad. 
Most people being VT doesn't change that the VT's shouldn't randomly claim, because it helps narrow down who isn't faster. >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 01:14:22 AM
Shadoweh I sympathize with your feeling like freezing to death but I hope you are at least going to tell us who The Scum is and then vote them.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 01:15:26 AM
Well barring that I'm hoping Kilga will tell me who the scum are so I can repeat everything he says.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 01:16:10 AM
:V what are you going to do if kilga says you are the scum
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 01:22:15 AM
Cheez8
Nobody asked me to claim.  It didn't occur to me that claiming vanilla town was in fact claiming.  I was under the impression that most players were vanilla town so saying "I'm vanilla town" didn't have any meaning.  Apparently it seems I am the rare, actually vanilla town.  How sad.
Oh.

...I actually only noticed you were claiming carrot at first, not vanilla townie. I guess you did that too though, in which case neither one is really called for anyway. That's two barely significant strikes against you instead of one! Oh no!

I will hereby note that carrots are the best vegetable ever, and proceed to be slightly jealous.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 02, 2013, 01:31:36 AM
The scumteam are cheez/sb and serela.

Serela has never been contributive then and has not changed till now. Only sheeps are thrre.

Cheez is outright contradicting himself every two posts. Not that his case actually made sense. Town want the scum to die abd should provide all the necessary thought process to aid. Someone who would so simply backtrack his votes make his previous arguments entirely worthless. And only scum want to completely misgyide townies.

Sky paladin delivered everything i want at sb. So i will stop painstakingly rephrasing that and have scum baashing my face for that

I can and will take the vote on any of these scum.
 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 01:36:49 AM
My opinion of SB is that he reminds me a fair amount of how I like to play Day 1 with a little bit of Carthrat sprinkled in. I don't like that he's voting DNA right now, particularly since he moved off of Validon to do so, though I will grant that his DNA vote is the least offensive of the four. I like him better than most at present.

Speaking of the the Validon vote, I don't see the issue with it. (You'll recall that he cited agreeing with my reasons when making it!) If the "why me (and Dormio) and not Serela" thing was the only thing to it, then it'd be pretty weak, but it isn't. I fully stood/stand with him on this, for example:

Validon uses too many words to say he has no real scumreads and yet he's asking me and Dormio to contribute more? What?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 01:45:38 AM
I'm sad I was at work all day today because I would have unvoted Darkie forever ago, and now everyone's yelling at me for still being on him ;_; Oh well no use crying over spilt milk

Now that the day has actually gotten going there really should be something half-decently scummy for me to find, lesse here
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on November 02, 2013, 01:47:37 AM
@Kilga: Just because he's putting effort into it does not mean he's town... but of course I've been using effort as way to read people so now I feel kind of dumb. I mostly didn't get his logic, and for some reason I saw his posts as arrogant. I also thought that perhaps he was being too much of a tryhard, but voting him would sort of me voting for Cheez, which I wouldn't really do because I've been reading him super town. I still have my eye on him, but I'll back off for now until

Also oh look, Shadoweh is waking up. She hasn't said too much but again I was using effort as a judge of alignment. I didn't expect her to become so serious so early on, because normally she stays silly for a while then goes into full-blown serious, but that's null. So there's not much of a reason in hindsight to vote her for now.

PX... again, the content is hilariously missing and I really don't agree with his brief reasoning on SB, who I am also leaning town on. Of course, voting him now would be a terrible idea when he isn't particularly here. I'll hold off on him until he is able to post more (I remember he said something about a wedding, in which case I hope it goes well!).

That really just leaves Serela. To be honest I was thinking him as null at the start, but I'm worried about his lack of content that is relevant. Plus I still can't shake the potential of him and Polaris being ITP. Of course, if they were, it would be too obvious, and between the two of the Polaris seems definitely more town. Unless something else comes up with someone else:

##Unvote
##Vote: Serela


@Kilga: In hindsight asking Dormio and SB to post more was kind of an ignorant thing for me to say. At the time I felt as if Dormio was just still a little in RVS mode (which he wasn't) and SB hadn't said too much (which was me completely ignoring that he actually had some scumreads out). Currently my read on both of them is leaning town since they have both made some good points since that post you mentioned.

Cut: Oh Serela's here. Well, what are your scumreads?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 01:50:51 AM
Now that the day has actually gotten going there really should be something half-decently scummy for me to find, lesse here

wow is it even possible for this to be a town post
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 02:07:35 AM
Reasons I voted Darkie:Dealing with his level of logic is hands-thrown-into-the-air tier and I was sitting around with a vote that was for effectively no reason, that I disliked as much as everyone else did. So... I figured with the reason I gave out (jump onto growing wagon, weirdo-max tier logic, etc) it seemed ed1-strong enough for me, I did somewhat think it looked like he could be scum, plus it just felt -satisfying- to actually vote the person yelling at me over things like my completely null claim being super scummy >_>

But then the more and more darkie posted the less and less likely it looked that he was actually scum <_< Of course, I wasn't even here until now for a good chunk of that, but.

So, moving on.

Dormio your post on me is weird. I have no scumreads but I gave a reason for why I thought Darkninja was scummy as I seemed to make an at least somewhat serious vote on him? Also, yes, my vote on you was mostly derp. Last game made me forget that I loathe d1 because I don't care about the tiny piddly stuff and so I can't usually find anything to vote until the very end. (And by then everyone's usually mad at me and IHNN and just barely lynch him over me)

Want to see Dormio and Shadoweh come back with their read posts. I don't think their previous activity so far exactly shouts townie (not that it shouts scum either, it's just there's not a lot that I actually care about much) unlike, say, SkyPaladin or Cheez8 or... maybe Validon too?

I'd like to say Kilga's town but he's really good at mafia so that would be way jumping the gun, and SB looks better then he was acting so far previous game (but game circumstances are obv. different so this just means "not interesting enough to vote right now, review mid-d2").  PX is PX-strong so far (I have no idea what this means but) and CF7 is... mmn. CF7 seemed to be going well at first but he looks the least town-minded of the lot as he jumps onto the Darkie wagon IMO. Interested in what he'll do after he reads the thread again.

Oh jeez. I'm realizing my reads are all "town, townie-enough-for-this-minute-I-guess, and 'I want to see your next post where you think about everything again' and I kind of want to vote you assuming it doesn't look great'" but that doesn't give me anything immediate >_>;

Polly and PX are the only people I haven't talked about already. I have no idea what Polly!scum would even look like. I have no idea what PX anything looks like because I can't remember games where he did much :C Oh, I did talk about PX, but it was... well, it adequately summed up my thoughts on the matter I guess >_> They both look okay so far though, I guess.

Dormio/CF7/Shadoweh were the ones I put in my last category which is effectively "scumreads?" but technically two of them are supposedly rereading the game for the big post I'm waiting for >_>;

oh right I should ##unvote
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 02:08:03 AM
POLLY I THINK IT'S POSSIBLE WHEN I CAN'T FIND ANYTHING I CARE ABOUT IN THE FIRST TWO THIRDS OF D1 MOST OF THE TIME D;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 02:09:43 AM
SHADOWEH DORMIO I'M WAITING

cf7 too but he's not really here
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 02:13:48 AM
I have no idea what PX anything looks like because I can't remember games where he did much

For the record, neither do I, no matter who we're talking about. :V
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 02:16:57 AM
In other words that really shouldn't stop you too much and seeing it stop you so much makes me really question why I'm not suspecting you.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 02:24:13 AM
It only stopped me with two people, and it's only because their current play is entirely average in all aspects, pretty much at the point where without factoring in meta I can't have any existent opinion of them. Like, it's alright, it's not impressive, but it's not lackluster either, there's nothing -wrong- with it it's just not notably good either.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 02:25:24 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/3DCy5pr.gif)

##Unvote
##Vote Serela
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 02:26:18 AM
but unfortunately I can only help you guys lynch Serela IN SPIRIT because there's no way my vote can count unless Serela decides to vote himself
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 02:44:23 AM
dormio I just noticed you messaged me in irc

how in the world did you get me instead of kitten4u from tabcomplete?

WHO IS KITTAN

(actually posting about mafia takes priority over answering this though dormio, where is your post my reputation is weighing on this)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 02:53:47 AM
So, I said I'd be back after having my breakfast.
Now that I've finished eating my lunch, let's see what's been happening.

Serela's posts are amusing, as expected. sasuga selery.
Especially his big post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038981.html#msg1038981).
Like, a complete drop of Darkninjaabc suspicion because he's getting a bunch of flak for it.
Followed by suspicion of me who Serela admitted to not actually having anything on but is now suddenly suspect.
Also suspicion of Shadoweh who Serela has basically not mentioned up until this point. (lumping her with the other null reads he had doesn't really count as mentioning her)
Basically, Serela is taking a wait-and-see approach where he's just waiting for someone to make some mistake that he can jump on.
He literally still has 0 scumreads. I mean, come on.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 02:57:10 AM
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that all of the "suspicions" that Serela has are just "I'm not going to say anything and wait for these people to post something I can use".
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:04:06 AM
Quote
Like, a complete drop of Darkninjaabc suspicion because he's getting a bunch of flak for it.
FTR some of the other people on the Darkie wagon also heel-face-turned going "nevermind this guy is pretty town" >_>

I would have done it before people were ever yelling at me about it if I hadn't been at work instead. That being said, though, obviously there's no way I can prove I would have done this, etc, so not going to argue it past a single mention
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:07:04 AM
Quote
Followed by suspicion of me who Serela admitted to not actually having anything on but is now suddenly suspect.
Also suspicion of Shadoweh who Serela has basically not mentioned up until this point. (lumping her with the other null reads he had doesn't really count as mentioning her)
Because, clearly
A.I'm not allowed to develop new suspicious of anyone ever even though WE'RE NOT EVEN 48 HOURS INTO THE GAME YET
B.That I haven't mentioned being suspicious of Shadoweh is actually a flat-out lie.

I've previously mentioned noticing Shadoweh doing almost nothing but insignificant quips. Yes, I also argued in the opposite direction to explain why I wasn't voting her for it, but it's definitely not like I haven't brought up Shadoweh doing suspicious things before so far >_>

I like how the only things you have to mention on anyone are about me! This is kind of what I had been getting at in my previous post. The only content you have that doesn't seem insignificant is about me, and my d1 play is usually the easiest thing to attack in the history of ever.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:07:52 AM
also ##Vote Dormio

I'M STILL WAITING ON YOU TOO SHADOWEH
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:11:13 AM
Dormio's previous posts:There's a little mention on Validon, he says he doesn't like the Darkie wagon, apart from that it's all Serela Serela Serela

This is true for pretty much the entire game after jokevoting and the silly shenanigans related to newbies reacting to it occurred.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:13:01 AM
(tunnelling is scummy guys)
(especially when it's on a really easy to attack person)
(I mean I'm trying not to sound like I'm mad at dormio for attacking me because that's not it, but it reminds me of scum!uesugi tunneling on super kindergarten level obvscum kaori in Swordgirls all of d2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:14:40 AM
There's also the part where I think the stuff he's attacking me for in his latest post is stupid, but I already responded to that.

I'm really bad about posting numerous times in a row lately. I'm sorry. :C
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 03:16:32 AM
(I mean I'm trying not to sound like I'm mad at dormio for attacking me because that's not it, but it reminds me of scum!uesugi tunneling on super kindergarten level obvscum kaori in Swordgirls all of d2)

so what you're trying to say is, scum!dormio is tunneling on super kindergarten level obvscum you

sounds legit
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:18:58 AM
I have found my ED1 strong case and I actually seriously want him lynched now so I'd love responses on what people think about Dormio/my case on him.

I CANNOT FUNCTION UNTIL A CERTAIN LEVEL OF CONTENT HAS APPEARED IN THE THREAD FOR ME TO REVIEW SO IT TAKES AWHILE FOR ME TO GET GOING ;_;

Cut by polly uhm well I guess you could word it like that but

that's

that's not quite what I meant by the reference D;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 03:26:46 AM
but you know, you can't really consider it ED1 when the day is almost 2/3 over.

also your case is dumb if only because you could've made it all the way back in post #237 but you just decided to unvote Dormio instead. so your vote now just looks like a bad reaction to Dormio's post.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:30:34 AM
Dormio's post is bad though.

He attacks me for stupid things like deciding someone is suspicious that I hadn't previously talked about, when the game's only barely started.

And for deciding someone is suspicious that I -HAVE- talked about doing suspicious things already >_>

Besides, the longer he tunnels on me, the worse it is that he hasn't done other noteworthy things. I mean, it's fine up to a point. But then his "rereading the game and opinions and etc" post has nothing but me and it's just dude this is not right
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:32:10 AM
I don't get how making it after Dormio's (bad) post suddenly invalidates my case, either. If nothing my case is even more true then it would have been before he made his post, especially considering the reasoning he's using now just plain seems faulty.

You just seem to be handwaving it entirely because I wanted Dormio to talk about the game first (and then he proceeded to talk about nothing but me)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 03:39:38 AM
I never said your case is invalidated, I just said it was bad, i.e. scummy.

Even if your points on Dormio are completely valid, the way you handled it is all sorts of scummy. It looks like you decided to pick on Dormio first and add a case as an afterthought. It's even worse when you look at the unvote from earlier, because that really just makes you think "Serela really doesn't care about scumhunting, does he?"
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 03:40:31 AM
Actually, it's more like you decided to defend against his post first, and then you decided you could OMGUS him for it and then backed it up afterwards with a case.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:45:47 AM
I defended against his post and then realized it was scummy as shit and Dormio has been tunneling on me.

Does this order of actions really make the case bad? >_>

POLLY ARE YOU SCUM WITH DORMIO I DON'T WANT TO BE BEST BUDDIES WITH YOU RIGHT NOW
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:46:30 AM
(I'm kidding but anyway where's someone else I need other people to respond to me)
(Shadoweh I'm still waiting on you to have opinions about the game get your ass in here you have opinions to talk about apart from the ones related to lynching dormio in the face)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:47:38 AM
But yeah it's legit urgh that Polly is literally saying "I don't care if your case on dormio is valid or not because I think you waiting for Dormio to finish his rereads post and THEN attack him is scummy"
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 03:50:12 AM
did dormio even say anything about a rereads post?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:52:11 AM
>as per usual a bunch of stuff happened while I was asleep
>whatever I guess I'll go eat and then reorganize my thoughts

This heavily implies Dormio is going to have, well, anything to say about things that have happened since his last post.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 03:52:57 AM
Even so it doesn't change the fact that he -should- have more to say about the game then he does.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 03:57:56 AM
well since this conversation is going to go in circles, i'll just go watch another anime episode until someone else comes along
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 04:03:12 AM
yeah p.much

You've been around long enough to do I curse ed1 and go around without scumreads (whilst getting yelled at) as town during it on a regular basis but I guess it's still bad play so w/e

if it helps this is still massively better then I could normally be expected to do (I have townreads on a third of the game, a scumread I believe in, and 2 people who are liable to turn into scumreads pretty soon especially if SHADOWEH DOESN'T MAKE A GOOD POST SOMETIME)

Sadly I need to go to bed in a minute and I will have little to no time for mafia in the morning because I work at 9am instead of the usual 12am. (except for some reason that's called midnight, I just checked, so uh, noon) I'll hopefully have time to say more words though 'cause at this point I imagine I'll really want to.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 04:04:30 AM
You've been around long enough to do I curse ed1 and go around without scumreads (whilst getting yelled at) as town during it on a regular basis but I guess it's still bad play so w/e
to know I curse*

Maybe next time I'll try that thing where I just wait for someone to replace out so I skip the part of the game where there's not enough content for me to get reads on anyone.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: CF7 on November 02, 2013, 05:52:40 AM
My ISP decided that i don't need access to the internet for the whole evening. And i couldn't even find a not passwordprotected wifi. Okay reading now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: BT on November 02, 2013, 07:39:49 AM
Votecount 1.8

Serela (3): Dormio, Kilgamayan, Validon98, Polaris
SB (2): PX, Sky_Paladin
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Cheez8 (1): Darkninjaabc
Dormio (0): Serela

Not Voting (2): Shadoweh, Cheez8

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in 22 hours and 20 minutes!
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)

Quote from: bars
CF7 - 609
PX - 411
Shadoweh - 401
Everyone else - 400

PX got granted V/LA for a day and 400 spared.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 02, 2013, 07:43:01 AM
Welp Polaris said I have to make a post tonight even though I have to wake up early tomorrow to get down to LA for a wedding.

Well Kilga reasoned why the DNA wagon sucked so much ass, and it's pretty much why I don't like it.

Quote from: Serious Bananas
Hi PX, thanks for voting me again. Even though your vote was still on me. Anyway, I wouldn't say I'm exactly being subtle with my Dark push considering that I have actually explicitly said that I found him scummy earlier and continued to push on him up till now.
Ahahahahahaha. Oh god, I just read through your posts again. NOWHERE did you say at all was he scummy, or how you felt about him. You just kept throwing a bunch of shit at exploits from his posts. And telling others to vote him. You didn't even bother voting him until there was a wagon. If that ain't subtle then I don't know what is.

Quote
And yeah, I have more than one scumread, that isn't a scumtell you know.
That wasn't my point. It's okay to have a scumread on an "easy" target if it's because they're deserving of it. It's not okay when ALL your scumreads are pretty much "easy" targets that others have talked about already.

Quote
Also you're missing the main point of my Validon vote that he had absolutely no content about how he felt about the rest of the playerlist. I said "why me and Dormio" because it was hypocritical to not be suspicious of someone who's doing the same thing that you're calling other players out on, and there was also the part of the Kilga analysis to my vote. So that's a complete misrep there.
Quote from: SB
Validon uses too many words to say he has no real scumreads and yet he's asking me and Dormio to contribute more? What? He's also asking us over Serela who's done like nothing so yeah. Also agree with Kilga's analysis.
This was your vote on him. Sure, you said he doesn't have real scumreads, but the way you phrased the rest is pretty damn wrong. What's damning about asking others to contribute more? Why did you specifically had to add that in? Why the ask us over Serela? What is the scummy part, the fact that he doesn't have scumreads or the fact that he's asking you and Dormio over Serela? This looks more like an attempt to get attention away from you instead of just saying he has no scumreads, and the Kilga's analysis looks like an afterthought.

Quote
What are your other reads by the way?
Do I really need to tell you everybody I think is town? That's just useless noise on D1. However, I wouldn't care to see Serela hanging from the noose, it's just that I think you're a much higher priority than Serela.

CUT: Thanks
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 02, 2013, 07:47:49 AM
Sudden essay in my schedule.
Might not be back fast enough so....
##Vote Serela

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 02, 2013, 08:03:39 AM
Okay, Dormio can die before Serela, but neither is a scum read yet. Also, I'm currently drinking my own blood funneling through my nose. I think I should go to sleep.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 08:13:45 AM
I fell asleep immediately after making that last post. >_>
You all seriously suck. I wrote an essay about why I don't think Serela is scum and you immediately run him up. Although I just realized Polaris's vote won't count unless Serela decides to hang himself (A possibility!) Extra momentum from my mind, Serela doesn't spam post very well as scum. I don't mean he posts badly, I mean looking at the sheer amount of bla bla bla Serela's gotten out there he's probably not scum. Therefore this wagon is balls.
I would join the SB wagon but I said I would let Kilga tell me who the scum were so I will trust in his trust. Unfortunately he is voting Serela based on my handbook when I don't think Serela is scum for it. I guess I could go for CF7 or Validon, preferrably CF7 because something about them just makes me want to lynch them. I don't have a case beyond GUT right now.

It is kinda scummy though how SB is clinging to the DNA vote when everyone else clearly fled the wagon and won't return. >:T I'm gonna throw down a vote down and see if people want to change their minds considering I don't want to vote any of the major wagons AS USUAL

##Vote: CF7
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 08:14:31 AM
:V what are you going to do if kilga says you are the scum
I guess I would just have to vote myself.
PS the entire Serela wagon is worth it just for that super kindergarden level burn.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 02, 2013, 09:34:56 AM
Ahahahahahaha. Oh god, I just read through your posts again. NOWHERE did you say at all was he scummy, or how you felt about him. You just kept throwing a bunch of shit at exploits from his posts. And telling others to vote him. You didn't even bother voting him until there was a wagon. If that ain't subtle then I don't know what is.

Hey look, it's me expressing that I think Dark is scummy! (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038410.html#msg1038410)

Quote
That wasn't my point. It's okay to have a scumread on an "easy" target if it's because they're deserving of it. It's not okay when ALL your scumreads are pretty much "easy" targets that others have talked about already.

Okay, this argument actively annoys me. Just because a player is an easy target DOES NOT mean that being suspicious of them is unjustified. In fact, if they're easy, doesn't that means that there's plenty of reasons TO find them to suspicious.

Quote
This was your vote on him. Sure, you said he doesn't have real scumreads, but the way you phrased the rest is pretty damn wrong. What's damning about asking others to contribute more? Why did you specifically had to add that in? Why the ask us over Serela? What is the scummy part, the fact that he doesn't have scumreads or the fact that he's asking you and Dormio over Serela? This looks more like an attempt to get attention away from you instead of just saying he has no scumreads, and the Kilga's analysis looks like an afterthought.

Asking other people to contribute more isn't bad per say, but the fact that he was ignoring Serela who was more guilty of it than anyone else I could think of at that point was bad. And why are you focussing so hard on one point in my argument against him? Both parts are scummy and you're just blatantly misrepping me and ignoring any parts of my posts that will discredit my case on you.

Quote
Do I really need to tell you everybody I think is town? That's just useless noise on D1. However, I wouldn't care to see Serela hanging from the noose, it's just that I think you're a much higher priority than Serela.

Don't care about your townreads. Who I care about is your scumreads, and as of last post I didn't remember anyone but me. Right now it's the same situation except with an with a completely unjustified Serela suspicion thrown in there just because I asked.

Will address other stuff after a shower, I just got annoyed after reading this and wanted to get it out of the way first.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 02, 2013, 11:53:30 AM
ugh ok i have to do something else
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 12:42:26 PM
Friendly reminder that today is consolidation day (no it's not early to say this, there are totes people who would pop up within 10 hours and then be gone until after deadline)

anyway gtg to work be back in like 9 hours >> At least from then I'll be around until like an hour or two from deadline

SHADOWEH IF YOU DON'T LIKE MAJOR WAGONS THEN HOW ABOUT DORMIO WE CAN PRETEND IT'S DAY 5
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Validon98 on November 02, 2013, 12:44:11 PM
I would join the SB wagon but I said I would let Kilga tell me who the scum were so I will trust in his trust.

Something about this doesn't sit well with me. It's just I usually would expect everyone to put their own effort in in some way, but opening admitting "I'M GOING TO FOLLOW KILGA'S OPINION" just irks me. And then of course you say you won't agree with him about Serela and instead vote on the person who hasn't said the most besides PX (who has a legitimate to not have posted much, so I'm not angry at him). This just makes me go urgh.

@SB: Okay, I know I overlooked Serela earlier, and that's because simply I am more used to him not posting as much D1 and I was thinking he would be getting more scumreads later on. Meanwhile I had higher standards for you and Dormio at the time, simply because you both end up getting lots of thoughts down earlier. It was a misjudging on my end of when RVS had ended, at which point I tend to A- Take people's posts more seriously, and B- Expect lots out of people. It's also because a lot of the time I tend to overlook Serela's posts early on (similarly with Shadoweh until there's a pointwhere she really confuses me to the point of me wanting to ISO her).

PX does have a point about you sticking with the Dark wagon (which isn't 100% bad but considering everyone else by now has realized how dumb it was to begin with...) has left a bad taste in my mouth. Also that link is to you complaining about me not voting, and disagreeing with my mentality on voting but not saying how that's scummy. That's mostly why everyone was on Dark's case as well (including me), because from what I understand most of us went "his logic and mentality make no sense, this looks really bad, SCUM." But seeing as you were also on Dark's case and haven't let off, it makes perfect sense that you used similar logic.

My vote is still on Serela for now because I'm not overly convinced by his recent efforts, but I'm willing to change to SB, maybe Shadoweh although I'm not entirely sure about her.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 12:47:10 PM
Re:shadoweh's posts are still fairly not-that-great (the added scumhunting was "SB won't get off Darkie augh" and then suddenly voting CF7, although at least I could get behind a CF7 wagon) but I'd much rather vote dormio so

right, leaving
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 01:22:34 PM
Sorry for disappearing last night, sleepytime came basically out of nowhere and much earlier than anticipated.

I'm pretty firmly in the Dormio/Polaris camp in regards to Serela, to the surprise of no one, I'm sure. Two things I want to highlight in particular:

Especially his big post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038981.html#msg1038981).
Like, a complete drop of Darkninjaabc suspicion because he's getting a bunch of flak for it.

...

Basically, Serela is taking a wait-and-see approach where he's just waiting for someone to make some mistake that he can jump on.

The DNA vote isn't the first time Serela got a bunch of flak for a crappy vote and dropped it as a result. Casting votes based on cases that are so easily dismantled that they backfire on you is a pretty clear indicator that you're not really trying with your cases. The "wait-and-see" approach ties neatly into this lack of effort as well.

I never said your case is invalidated, I just said it was bad, i.e. scummy.

Even if your points on Dormio are completely valid, the way you handled it is all sorts of scummy. It looks like you decided to pick on Dormio first and add a case as an afterthought. It's even worse when you look at the unvote from earlier, because that really just makes you think "Serela really doesn't care about scumhunting, does he?"

This sums up perfectly what I think of Serela's Dormio vote. Well, thius and laughing at the accusation that Dormio is tunneling. If you keep doing scummy things and someone keeps calling you on them, that's not them tunneling, that's you being scummy. In this cases, probably because you're scum.

Onto other stuff. Shadowy and SB have both dropped a fair amount in my eyes overnight. whyyyyyyyyy ;_;

Shadowy's vote is on someone only one or two other people have even glanced at and she isn't pushing the case at all. Vote, meet park! There is also this:

It is kinda scummy though how SB is clinging to the DNA vote when everyone else clearly fled the wagon and won't return. >:T

This is a gross misrepresentation of what happened because SB cast his vote for DNA before people started arguing against the DNA train and two other people dropped their cases, and he hadn't posted again by the time you said this. Where is the clinging in the face of adversity? He plain wasn't here to do anything about it. I feel like you're going to point at #277 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039106.html#msg1039106) and go "look there it is" but that came after your assessment of his behavior so it can't have possibly been factored in.

But then there is this!

Asking other people to contribute more isn't bad per say, but the fact that he was ignoring Serela who was more guilty of it than anyone else I could think of at that point was bad.

This validates PX's main argument against your Validon vote, I think. Trying to redirect the negative attention when you don't think the original negative attention "isn't bad per se" is Not A Good Thing. The thing is also that the original form of the negative attention is a bad thing, a little bit because it's hypocritical for one to call for contribution from other players when one hasn't been contributing themselves, but mostly because calls for contribution from players during ED1 is no more than town-cause cheerleading and empty noise. It's very "look at me I'm helping!!!" without actually being helpful. So no, I think you got this response completely backwards and that sort of response under pressure makes me suddenly worry about you. That and your total lack of doing anything other than respond to PX's case against you (like address the radically different circumstances of the DNA wagon compared to what they were like when you cast your vote).

Speaking of, DNA, for whatever it is worth now, I'll address Validon's #235. It is true that scum can be efforted as well, but it is a combination of the effort and faith that makes me think DNA is town. DNA got strung up by a series of votes pretty fast, but instead of being cowed into reconsidering where he was coming from or simply lying low for a while, he kept trying to assert himself and his stances. I think scum are far more likely to do one of the first two in the face of that kind of pressure while town is far more likely to do the last.

I realize how wide-spread this is, but I could get behind any of Serela, Validon, Shadowy, or SB as lynch candidates, in roughly that order. (Card subject to change.) DNA and Dormio trains I will actively vote against. CF7 feels like a boring D1 lurker lynch and a potential train there is getting most of its support from people I don't trust which shies me away from it as well.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 01:23:29 PM
I am the king of closing my bold tags. That should read as "Casting votes based on cases that are so easily dismantled that they backfire on you is a pretty clear indicator that you're not really trying with your cases. The "wait-and-see" approach ties neatly into this lack of effort as well."
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 01:32:45 PM
Okay so quickly reading through what I missed, both Dormio and Serela seem like people I wouldn't really have an issue with lynching now.

I wonder what it says when there are two people arguing against each other and I feel like I could lynch both of them. Probably just that I'm not too good at this.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 01:38:14 PM
Scum/scum arguments are not unheard of. Obviously you shouldn't go "because it's possible, it must be true in this case," but you shouldn't completely close your mind to the idea either.

Of course, I say this as the guy that (a) currently thinks both Shadowy and SB could be scum, and (b) once put on a Day 1 slapfight show with UK that ultimately worked to great benefit, so my position on the matter may be a little biased. >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 02:14:33 PM
Scum/scum arguments are not unheard of. Obviously you shouldn't go "because it's possible, it must be true in this case," but you shouldn't completely close your mind to the idea either.
Don't worry. I keep that in mind all the time, which is why I have so much trouble forming an opinion that I don't end up going back on at least once by the end of the day.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 02:16:45 PM
I don't slapfight with my buddies unless they start it first. :<
Kilga: to be honest I just looked at votecounts when saying that, I didn't have a post to point to. Look I said I would sheep you but I wrote a dissertation on why I don't think your wagon is right, because Serela getting attention gets him run over fast, and instead of answering me you pointed at my gut vote which obviously doens';t have a case behind it because you can't substantiate GUT.

Serela, Dormio literally has 0 votes on him right now because you suck. How is that better then what I'm doing? :V If you want to save yourself consolingly you should try and figure out of SB is worth nailing or not, although yelling to lynch Shadoweh until it happens works sometimes, you're just a pilsburier target.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 02, 2013, 02:40:55 PM
I have some breather room so mafia.

Kilg and px is making me noodle. They pretty much presented every single reason on why serela and sb are scum .
Since i feel that all has been covered by them i dont really want to wall and yell with the scum. Walls take at least an hour of frantic typing with me kissing the phone and i am too tired for that. Its also just emotionally devastating to endure their weird scum logic and see people buying it. Townreads are worthless? Thats so helpful to town sb

I might not be making another post tonight and d1 is almost over so i am annoucing my intention to role cop sb tonight.
Will report results next day.
 Thanks so much for being awesometown.

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 02, 2013, 03:05:38 PM
I haven't seen anything to change my vote; although it doesn't seem popular to vote SB right now. 

My scum picks are SB, CF7, and Shadoweh.  Serela is an odd duck.  Mostly because I didn't expect Polaris to vote for him (although it doesn't count of course).  I think there's a good argument for flipping Serela just because it's an obvious lead *for something*.  Especially as Serela has been fairly evasive and keeps saying "I will totally give a read when these other people have said more things".  We're down to the last 24 hours and the two main candidates - SB and CF7 - who both said "I am totally going to do a read" have made up some excuse and vanished.  I don't think you're going to get a chance, Serela.  You need to make your move before more people vote for you. 

A lot of people have been marking Serela but I didn't really see anything awful or bad, Serela really just didn't do anything.  That's kind of bad in itself.  Anyway, this is mostly a 'I have been watching the thread but have not seen anything noteworthy' and now am going to sleep.  I have work in the morning so I may not get to check and post until after phase end.  Yes, I work on Sunday.  Now is your chance to surprise lynch me while I'm away.  Good luck~
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 02, 2013, 03:07:27 PM
Oh, I totally missed my main point. 

The main people Serela has apparently been waiting for are CF7, Shadoweh, and SB.  By coincidence these are also my scum picks. 

So I'm worried about the inference for Serela if they turn out to be scum, and vice versa, if Serela is scum...what does it mean for those three?  And now zzz. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 03:23:00 PM
Gonna be out for a little bit later today due to work, but it's just a staff meeting so it shouldn't be too long.

Shadowy, I can't really answer your assertion that "Serela can't multipost as scum." :V I guess I can at least say that I think you made too much of Serela saying fuck, since I don't see him being mad at DNA as much as I see him being incredulous at being asked to claim halfway through D1 when his train isn't too far along yet (and I can see town and scum anyone being equally likely to say fuck in a case like that). I think you casting a completely irrelevant vote is more attention-worthy anyway. You're not trying to scumhunt and might as well not even be in the game right now. This is not townie behavior.

DNA: Don't tell everyone who you're planning on targeting tonight. If scum know how you're going to act they can mess with you with any number of roles they might have.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 03:30:52 PM
Actually, you know what? I'm changing my mind.

##Unvote, ##Vote: Shadoweh

The CF7 vote is unsubstantiated and worthless, the SB comment is terrible, and she's just kind of been floating along with barely a presence otherwise.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 02, 2013, 03:32:50 PM
....kilga i get your point in hindsight but now i am lost on what to do.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 03:35:44 PM
You should choose who you think is the most worthwhile target and then target them and just not tell anyone beforehand who that is.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 02, 2013, 03:38:28 PM
Alright. Small change of plans.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 05:32:31 PM
Shadowy, I can't really answer your assertion that "Serela can't multipost as scum." :V I guess I can at least say that I think you made too much of Serela saying fuck, since I don't see him being mad at DNA as much as I see him being incredulous at being asked to claim halfway through D1 when his train isn't too far along yet (and I can see town and scum anyone being equally likely to say fuck in a case like that). I think you casting a completely irrelevant vote is more attention-worthy anyway. You're not trying to scumhunt and might as well not even be in the game right now. This is not townie behavior.
We're not talking about 'anyone', we're talking about Serela. It's doubly insulting if you'll subscribe to my Serela dissertation if it supports your scum suspicion, but if I disagree you'll laugh it off as no big deal. Serela can't post as quickly as scum. It's not a matter of multiposting, it's a matter of presence, and he's kind of got it right now.  I don't always start by scumhunting anyways, especially if I'm having problems reading teh game. Don't you think if I were scum I'd care a little more about making it look good for you?

My SB comment is justified. You even admit it was justified in the same post you accuse me of being scum in. You're allowed to be upset at the quality of posting, but I won't allow you to accuse me based on things you yourself believe to be scummy.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 06:47:49 PM
I'm ok with lynching Serela or Shadoweh. I don't like how Shadoweh is defending Serela with weak meta reasoning.
I don't have any strong feelings for SB so I can't say with conviction that he is The Scum unless I just sheep everyone blindly.

Also I'm annoyed that my vote is totally useless because Serela is never going to do anything useful with his vote >:(
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 07:05:55 PM
...Okay, we have less than half a day left in the day. A Day 1 lynch is generally good, right? If so, we probably oughtta start buckling down and get to actually deciding on someone says the only remaining nonvoter. Looking at the people who I could see being lynched...

Darkie: No way. Even though I guess there's a chance he's scum it's super ultra mega unlikely and I'm probably not going to give the notion a chance until at least Day 3 because the setup for it being true is just so out there.
Validon: He's acting pretty... echo-y overall today, but I don't think this is enough of a reason to suspect him. I wouldn't vote for him even if it became the main wagon.
Serela: A couple of legitimate arguments have been raised against him, as well as a couple of not-so-legitimate arguments. However, a good portion of the reason I have to not vote Serela right away comes from people who aren't Serela. Right now, I'm against the wagon for him, but at the same time seeing it go through wouldn't bother me too much.
SB: My opinion on SB is all over the place but even though I find him subtly suspicious I don't really support any of the other people who find him suspicious. Can't really say if I'd support an SB wagon or not, but probably not.

Dormio: I went through an ISO on him earlier and things didn't really look good. I would have no problems following a Dormio wagon if one got off the ground.
Kilga: For some reason I keep thinking that Kilga and Dormio are together on the scum team. I know I knew a couple reasons too, but I can't remember them right now. Anyway while I trust his logic I don't really trust anything he says because of the way he's applying it. If other people found a legitimate reason to start a Kilga wagon that I can't find I'd gladly hop on.
Shadoweh: I can sort of understand the suspicion against her, especially since I think she made a pretty good case against herself earlier on by stating that she doesn't contribute much as scum.

I'm going to rule out PX, me, Polly, Paladin and CF7 because I can't see them getting lynched today, whether from a lack of scummy behavior or a lack of people interested in voting for them.

There you go. I'd happily vote for Kilga, Dormio or Shadoweh in order to end the day, or maybe even one of the four I ruled out if a wagon somehow suddenly forms for one of them, but people are gonna have to start agreeing first. And CF7, SB... get those votes off Darkie already.

Actually, you know what, I'll help spur things along here.
##Vote: Dormio
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 07:09:36 PM
since when was dormio even a viable wagon
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 07:13:47 PM
Serela (3): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc
SB (2): PX, Sky_Paladin
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (1): Kilgamayan
Dormio (1): Serela, Cheez8
CF7 (1): Shadoweh

wow i'm kind of worried we aren't even going to get a lynch today.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 07:14:40 PM
since when was dormio even a viable wagon
Since never, but he's the only one of the people I'm actually suspicious of who has a vote against them even if it doesn't count.


um
...except for Shadoweh

I should probably pay attention to the posts that come after the most recent votecount when I'm talking about the current votes
but still that's kilga's vote and I don't think I trust him that much.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: BT on November 02, 2013, 07:15:24 PM
You literally just cut me with an identical votecount. Okay.

Deadline in 10 hours and 45 minutes!
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 07:16:59 PM
Oh whatever, I'll hope against hope and leave my vote there for the time being, but if Shadoweh's wagon picks up steam or if we really aren't going to get a lynch any other way I'll switch my vote over to her or Serela.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 07:21:45 PM
Sorry I was getting impatient :(

Anyway, I would like CF7, SB, and Sky Paladin to consider Serela as today's lynch.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 09:02:59 PM
We're not talking about 'anyone', we're talking about Serela. It's doubly insulting if you'll subscribe to my Serela dissertation if it supports your scum suspicion, but if I disagree you'll laugh it off as no big deal.

The original reference to Scum Serela Vocabulary was a joke, because I like poking at you in benign, humorous ways in games we're both in (in fact, I do it again later in that very same post). I've found that attacking/voting for someone without outright calling them or what they're doing scummy is a slight psychological scumtell in general as opposed to being true of Serela in particular. If I had known you would hook onto me namedropping you with the Scum Serela Vocabulry line I would have simply not made it and felt the case I was making against him was no worse for the exclusion. Ultimately my case against Serela has no actual meaningful grounding in what you've said about him in the past.

I don't always start by scumhunting anyways, especially if I'm having problems reading teh game. Don't you think if I were scum I'd care a little more about making it look good for you?

> "If I were scum" argument

lel

If we're actually going to entertain player meta to this degree I think you're generically afraid of me in every game we're both in regardless of your alignment, so no, I don't think you'd do anything different with me specifically in mind whether you're town or scum. Particularly since I'm only one person and I know you're smart enough to realize my vote doesn't count for 7 votes at once.

My SB comment is justified. You even admit it was justified in the same post you accuse me of being scum in.

Actually, I describe exactly how it isn't justified in that post! There is no post between his initial vote of DNA and your accusing him of "clinging to the DNA vote" where he actually does so. Hell, there's only one post of his between those two posts at all, and it's a three-word-long clarification. You were Making Shit Up with that assessment regardless of anything he did after the fact, and now you're Making Shit Up Again by telling me I did the exact opposite of what I actually did. Maybe instead of Making Shit Up you should be telling us why CF7 should hang.

Cheez: I have no idea why you think I'm scum. I didn't care the first time because your accuation came with no reasoning or vote, but if it's going to actively interfere with your willingness to vote for Shadowy, I want to know what is up. Why am I scum?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 09:26:27 PM
Perhaps I should say "Making Stuff Up" instead in the interest of keeping cooler heads. The core accusations remain, though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 09:49:49 PM
At this rate I won't be able to reach my 400 word minimum :( I've already said I think we should lynch Serela or Shadoweh, though I prefer lynching Serela more. Is there anything else I should talk about?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 09:54:02 PM
So I had an Aha Moment in the shower and went back and reviewed SB's repsonse to PX's case just to be sure I wasn't misremembering it. Most of it is responses to PX talking about the Validon vote or talking about "easy targets." None of it is him "clinging to the DNA vote" unless you count him not changing his vote as clinging to the vote. Judging from the end of #277 and what he said in #278, I wouldn't be surprise if he meant to address it then, but whatever the case, his posts still don't validate Shadowy's initial accusation of how SB was handling his DNA vote. So no, Shadowy's statement wasn't valid before, and still isn't valid now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 09:58:32 PM
Polaris, what do you think of Validon? Your last assessment of him was "Null leaning scum, but I would like to see more posts with cases that are a bit stronger" from almost 24 hours ago. How has this changed, if at all?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:05:26 PM
kilga defending dormio ignoring most of the game in favor of sitting on super-duper-easy vote serela boggles my mind

Like, even if it's not a bad vote, it's not an excuse to be -doing effectively nothing in terms of the rest of the game- (saying "dark wagon is bad" is something almost literally everyone including the people who voted him did)

You were Uesugi right? This makes me even sadder. ;_; Actually no, I think you were Tenshi but still was mainly the one saying my Uesugi case sucked.

 It's also annoying that I seem to be almost exclusively hated on for the Dark wagon, but, whatever. Maybe I should have actually announced I was leaving for work like I usually do. CF7 actually probably is getting flak but he's lurking so hard it doesn't come up as a thing.

It's honestly feels like people are practically misrepping me over it- Darkie didn't start looking super townie until afterwords and several other people on the Darkie wagon voted him after I did and then heel-face-turn'd a little while after as well, but since it's Serela "SCUM JUMPING OFF BECAUSE GETTING YELLED AT"

SkyPaladin says I'm just waiting on people over scumreading them but one went through almost immediately and Shadoweh got followed up on fairly quickly too >_> That only left CF7 out of my bunch!

Speaking of CF7, he said he was back and rereading and then dropped off the face of the planet. >:T It sounds like he might be having legit internet issues though, so...

I LIKE HOW DORMIO HASN'T SAID ANYTHING SINCE BEFORE I STARTED YELLING AT HIM EVEN THOUGH THE DAY IS ENDING (maybe he left and hasn't come back but) stop lurking so you can make another post for me to yell at and then maybe people will lynch you with me.

Anyway, back to Shadoweh, she's still doing almost nothing. (apart from defending me) While I'm happy she's on my side, she's doing almost zilch in terms of scumhunting despite totally being around, The only thing was the single sentence on SB which is pretty darn easy to come up with considering the Darkie wagon immediately built up and burned down with everyone's glaring distaste at it. And unexplanationally voting CF7 but yeah.

I'd be pretty okay with lynching Shadoweh at this point but Dormio would still be so much betterrrr









Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:09:21 PM
also, in terms of "since when was dormio even a viable wagon" look at the votecount

I can recall several people passively saying they didn't really like Dormio, even if they weren't exactly hyped about it, but if that can't count as viable then I'm the only viable wagon here >_> And with EIGHT HOURS LEFT that is so not true.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 10:12:40 PM
His presence is pretty weak and my priorities have all but switched to Serela so I kind of forgot about him. At the very least he's being a little cautious so I don't feel a lot of conviction from anything he does, and I think Validon is still a bit new (?) so that might be the reason. But that doesn't say anything about his alignment... Ultimately I'd say he's still null, although he gets bonus points for voting Serela right now, so I'm of the opinion that he can't be scum with Serela at the very least. And I think Serela is scum so I don't see it necessary to lynch Validon today.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:16:58 PM
Every time I read one of Polly's posts I think "If I actually tried to make a case on Polly I think he'd be a scumread" but then I don't actually do it.

Oh well Dormio is forever higher priority and Shadoweh as backup case is far more likely to get lynched then Polly >_> If I live to d2 I can worry about it then. Or I could maybe ask BT more about my role.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 10:17:42 PM
I would prefer we didn't lynch someone based on not being liked by several people passively `_`

and yes, Serela, my point was that you're like the only viable wagon here ^_^ ^_^ ^_^
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 10:19:05 PM
Every time I read one of Polly's posts I think "If I actually tried to make a case on Polly I think he'd be a scumread" but then I don't actually do it.
wow is it even possible for this to be a town post
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 10:19:18 PM
I get the feeling that I might be slightly sick. I ended up falling asleep at like 10pm last night and woke up at 1am and I was all like "screw this" and now here I am.

Anyway.
I don't really have much to say about Serela right now so I might as well finally get around to putting in some input into Shadoweh or Validon or something.
I mean, in regards to Shadoweh, I have to say that I agree with Kilga about most of what he says.

There's also that her unvote and latest vote on CF7 are basically distracting at this point.
I mean especially if you consider that, in the post where she votes for CF7 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039083.html#msg1039083) she mentions how it is scummy for Serious Bananas to be voting for Darkninjaabc when it doesn't look like Darkninjaabc's wagon has much support and then she votes for CF7 who even Shadoweh admits has no support at the moment. Or something like that.

As for Validon I've pretty much not been reading any of his posts so I don't really know what to think of them.
If I recall correctly I just kind of skimmed them and thought they were dumb and forgot about them.
Give me a bit and I'll go actually read whatever he typed.

Warning - while you were typing 11 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
I get the feeling that typing words in any sort of timely manner is beyond me right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:20:30 PM
I eagerly await BT confirming whether or not my rolepm is supposed to actually HEAVILY HINT that you're town or not >_> This is part of the reason for that, Polly. Oh man it's dormio time2read
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:21:53 PM
dormio comments on super obvious wagon #2 and then :efforts: out

I mean, I'm sorry that you're sick/feeling sick D: But yeah opinion unchanged
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 10:22:42 PM
btw I asked BT that as soon as I got my PM

obviously you must be scum for not being super town like I was

/me flips hair

(this is a joke btw)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 10:23:12 PM
well, asking BT about the PM wasn't a joke, but the rest of it is
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 10:25:50 PM
Just popping in here to respond to Serela quickly but it's like, I'm pretty sure that I've said this in a prior game somewhere, but I really don't care about anyone that I'm not reading as scum and I don't see any reason why I should be wasting my time and effort reading about the people that I don't care about when the people I think are scum are right in front of me.
Also that should have probably been more than one sentence but the amount of care given is none.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:28:51 PM
that still means I was the only person you were finding to be scummy at all >_> (You did make a comment on cf7 once but you never mentioned him again, granted he disappeared forever too but)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 10:29:29 PM
And when I say not wasting my time and effort reading about the people I don't care about I am obviously still reading them just not particularly caring all that much before Serela tries to get any funny ideas about saying bad things about me because you know that's kind of all he's doing despite saying that I'm tunnelling while all he has is I'm scum because I'm voting for him because he still literally has 0 suspicions other than the OMGUS on me.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 10:30:54 PM
Well yeah people disappearing forever tends to make me forget about them which is why I would normally take extra care in rereading them but I think I've just been kind of falling asleep and feeling sore afterwards instead.
Speaking of which I really need to look at PX's, like, 3 posts or something.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 10:45:31 PM
Cheez: I have no idea why you think I'm scum. I didn't care the first time because your accuation came with no reasoning or vote, but if it's going to actively interfere with your willingness to vote for Shadowy, I want to know what is up. Why am I scum?
It's not really going to interfere with that unless there's suddenly a Kilga wagon straight out of left field, but sure.

For starters, you left a really bad impression on me when your first post targeted Validon for not having much of an opinion in what I'm pretty sure was his first and only real post of the game at that point. Sure, it looked like he was analyzing things and that there was some conclusion that he'd reach eventually, but just because it fizzled out disappointingly doesn't mean he's scummy for it. It really didn't help my impression of you when that became one of the closest things this day has to a wagon.

(Yes, before it's pointed out, I did vote for Validon as well a little bit later, but I already explained that I only did so in hopes of Validon deciding to form an opinion so that I could pursue my other suspicions with a little bit more info first.)

Not counting your bit of science (since you stated your vote would remain on Validon otherwise), your next vote was for Serela. Let's look at that one:
##Unvote
##Vote: Serela


About as lame-duck as Validon in terms of general content. My mind change is twofold; Serela's vote is half-incomprehensible, half-misrepresentation - "eagerness to vote me for noncontribution while I've stated I was about to make a post of it and then even showed some sign of apparently being in the middle of really getting it done" is straight-up rude, given (a) Dormio was changing his vote from his jokevote target to a serious target, and (b) Dormio had expressed irritation with Serela noncontribution before (not contributing in the past isn't magically erased from history by starting to write stuff in the present) - and his notes on Sky Paladin make little sense given Sky Paladin not only has a serious vote down now, but it's on the guy Serela's voting for (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/board,13.0.html). I don't know about other people, but when I'm town I try to pay attention to when people vote for the person I want to vote for, particularly if I'm going to say stuff about those people.

So near I can tell, Serela:

- Dislikes Dormio for deceitful reasons
- Dislikes Sky Paladin for incorrect reasons
- Dislikes Sky Paladin despite Sky Paladin voting for Dormio
- Maybe dislikes Darkninjalphabet possibly kinda? I can't tell.
- Dislikes PX for ??? reasons (I went back and checked the original post on this matter and am having the damnedest time parsing it
- Dislikes no one for legitimate reasons
Starting off with "This guy is Validon but worse"... Well, I've already established I didn't think Validon should be lynched to begin with. The misrepresentation argument is one I agree with, but the rest most of the SOME of the rest of Serela's argument is very easy to follow. On top of that, the argument that he shouldn't dislike Sky Paladin simply because Sky Paladin voted for Dormio too is just bad. Day one is a pretty uncertain time, so suspecting two people even though one of those people suspects the other isn't really rare, nor is it in any way scummy.

I'd say that Serela being another of the closest things to a wagon in the day plays a role too, but I can't. Not because you were the second vote, but because it's pretty clear all those votes were mostly a result of the hole Serela was helping people dig himself into.

Anyway, after that everything you did was yelling at people who were voting for Darkie, continuing to disapprove of whatever Serela and Validon were doing (sometimes for a very good reason, admittedly, but there were times I didn't agree with your accusations as well) and eventually starting to target Shadoweh when she became suspicious (rightfully so, I'd say.)

That's all there was up to that post, anyway, and the Shadoweh thing was very recent so it didn't really shake the concerns I had established towards you so far.


...And, five SIXTEEN cuts. Lessee here... let's post this right now
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 10:48:05 PM
Apparently Serela lives in a world where I didn't criticize both of his Dormio votes, didn't switch my vote to Shadowy, didn't push Validon as a possibility, and didn't open myself to the possibility of SB as a lynch candidate. Well okay then, that's two people Making Stuff Up about what I've done this game.

Shadowy is Serela your scumbuddy? I still remember Gensokyo Holy War where Serela was scumming it up all over the place in the thread and you were all NO HE'S TOTES TOWN.

Ooh I see a Cheez post! Gimme a moment to read it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:48:31 PM
woah I never saw that post kilga made that just got quoted

how did I miss that
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 10:48:58 PM
^ i also had gensokyo holy war flashbacks
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:49:15 PM
Quote
Apparently Serela lives in a world where I didn't criticize both of his Dormio votes, didn't switch my vote to Shadowy, didn't push Validon as a possibility, and didn't open myself to the possibility of SB as a lynch candidate. Well okay then, that's two people Making Stuff Up about what I've done this game.
Kilga what are you talking about?

Did you misinterpret me saying Dormio is useless as me saying Kilga is useless?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 10:49:57 PM
Like I literally have absolutely no idea what you're going on about there.

Although I should probably read that quoted post I missed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 10:54:44 PM
I don't remember if I actually made my point clear or not so before I start mulling through those new posts: I suspect you because you spent most of your meaningful posts going after the same two people. The first one I didn't feel was scummy in the first place, the second one I was and still am uncertain about but it seemed like a good part of the reasoning for your vote was "he's doing the same thing" so as far as I cared you were pursuing him for bad reasons. I guess overall I expected your accusations to be more rational or something if you were town, considering so many of your non-accusation posts are so rational.

and then five MORE posts dang it guys I was get dinner soon
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 10:56:23 PM
cheez are you scum
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 11:01:35 PM
Eh, not really sure about what I'm gleaning from the Validon read.
I mean I agree with most of the stuff being said about him and I guess I would vote for him except on a low priority.
Like I mean I guess his posts look super-reactionary. Or whatever you would call it.

Warning - while you were typing 14 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Well, whatever.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:03:16 PM
So basically, Dormio guesses he'd vote for Validon because he's sheeping everyone but he wouldn't be very commited to the vote or anything. He guesses, or whatever.

Can we lynch him yet

Also Kilga whatever I apparently said to you that was so horrible I'm pretty sure you're mistaking something actually aimed at Dormio D:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 11:04:09 PM
Well yeah because you're here. <3
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 11:04:42 PM
In regards to why I don't want Validon lynched as much as I normally would that is.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:06:47 PM
serela if you have to resort to picking at every little thing every time dormio posts and saying "look!!! we should lynch him!!!!!!!" then i think it's time for an intervention
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 11:08:01 PM
Speaking of which I really need to look at PX's, like, 3 posts or something.
So it's like, he's just trying to start random stuff with Serious Bananas but it's kind of like all he's doing and the random willingness to vote for either me or Serela while basically not mentioning anything about either of us at all or really addressing Serious Bananas' thoughts regarding us is kind of a thing.

Also I pretty much haven't read the last page or so that popped up yet so I'll get on that soon maybe.

Warning - while you were typing 4 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Like, you know, whatever.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:09:03 PM
serela if you have to resort to picking at every little thing every time dormio posts and saying "look!!! we should lynch him!!!!!!!" then i think it's time for an intervention
he -is- my big scumread y'know

if he keeps posting things I think are scummy I'm going to keep saying they're scummy!

Also the part where I'm trying to remind everyone he's scum and he doesn't look town at all and his posts keep not looking town and we should definitely lynch him PLEASE?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 11:10:09 PM
if he keeps posting things I think are scummy I'm going to keep saying they're scummy!
Just going to put it out there that I'm pretty sure you were accusing me of being tunnelscum for doing the same thing.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 02, 2013, 11:11:36 PM
Votecount/Deadline Reminder 1.9

Serela (3): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc
SB (2): PX, Sky_Paladin
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (1): Kilgamayan
Dormio (1): Serela, Cheez8
CF7 (1): Shadoweh

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in 6 hours and 47 minutes!
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:11:49 PM
Just going to put it out there that I'm pretty sure you were accusing me of being tunnelscum for doing the same thing.
This point is so wrong I don't even.

I actually have clear opinions on numerous players! And more then one is a scumread!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 11:12:42 PM
Speaking of CF7, he said he was back and rereading and then dropped off the face of the planet. >:T It sounds like he might be having legit internet issues though, so...
Yeah I'd be suspicious of him too if it wasn't for that.
Just popping in here to respond to Serela quickly but it's like, I'm pretty sure that I've said this in a prior game somewhere, but I really don't care about anyone that I'm not reading as scum and I don't see any reason why I should be wasting my time and effort reading about the people that I don't care about when the people I think are scum are right in front of me.
But Dormio, what if you choose to read somebody and notice they're scum?

nvm you cleared that up

woah I never saw that post kilga made that just got quoted

how did I miss that
You should start doing things that help your case

Kilga what are you talking about?

Did you misinterpret me saying Dormio is useless as me saying Kilga is useless?
Like I literally have absolutely no idea what you're going on about there.

Although I should probably read that quoted post I missed.
Actually no I should just start voting for you

cheez are you scum
maybe
are you scum

So Serela's posted enough for

##Unvote
and probably just about enough for a Serela vote soon if he keeps misrepresenting Dormio's posts like this.

Okay there I've actually read all... 28 new posts before posting this time
...Wow. 28 posts. 30 32 POSTS NEW RECORD
This sort of Day One is cool.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 11:12:56 PM
Serela: Oh hey I might have. Can you rewrite/rephrase the first three or four lines of #310 so that your meaning is clearer? Nearly all of it looks applicable to me (holding on to a vote for you, shouting down the DNA wagon), so.

Cheez: I have no idea why wagons existing are a thing that influence who is scummy and who isn't in your mind, so I'd appreciate clarification there. Anyway, saying I voted Validon for "not having an opinion" is a gross oversimplification to the point where meaning is lost. I voted for Validon for trying to look like he was contributing when he actually wasn't. This is a common scum tactic because it's harder for scum to form legitimate opinions than town. Serela was doing the same thing. As for the Sky Paladin thing, I never said Serela shoudn't be allowed to dislike Sky Paladin (if you think I did, please quote exactly where I did so). My point was that Serela disliked Sky Paladin for jokevoting, but Sky Paladin had since moved on to making a serious, efforted vote, and it was a vote Serela should have noticed because it was a vote for the guy Serela was voting for.

I think that's about it? Lemme know if there's anything else you want addressed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:13:46 PM
maybe
are you scum

scum post imo
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:17:55 PM
Serela: Oh hey I might have. Can you rewrite/rephrase the first three or four lines of #310 so that your meaning is clearer? Nearly all of it looks applicable to me (holding on to a vote for you, shouting down the DNA wagon), so.
"Kilga defending dormio for [insert of bunch of things dormio did] is boggling

Like, [insert more things dormio did and me complaining more]"

You say it looks applicable to you, but your original response was about how you didn't actually do that and how I was making things up  :V
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 11:19:30 PM
I actually have clear opinions on numerous players! And more then one is a scumread!
Anyway, back to Shadoweh, she's still doing almost nothing. (apart from defending me) While I'm happy she's on my side, she's doing almost zilch in terms of scumhunting despite totally being around, The only thing was the single sentence on SB which is pretty darn easy to come up with considering the Darkie wagon immediately built up and burned down with everyone's glaring distaste at it. And unexplanationally voting CF7 but yeah.
I dunno a quick skim through your posts again and this is pretty much the closest thing I can find to a scumread excluding the one you have on myself.
Point me to where your other solid scumreads are?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:19:43 PM
Cheez quotes posts about me being confused why Kilga is being mad at me, and then says "nevermind I should vote Serela"

I don't get how that train of thought is supposed to work >_> Kilga misinterpreted something I said, proceeded to make accusations at me, I was really confused because I had no idea what he was talking about. How does that make me scum?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 02, 2013, 11:20:15 PM
kilga, defending dormio, ignoring most of the game in favor of sitting on super-duper-easy vote serela, boggles my mind

Does that help see where I was coming from better?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:20:29 PM
but for srs, i'm only facetiously suspecting cheez right now because it feels like his kilga read was determined by voodoo. i can't really tell how scummy this is but there are a lot of question marks
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 11:21:38 PM
I get that the original comment about my Serela Radar was just a joke, but I'd still expect you to take me seriously when I put more effort then just a look into it. I did go out of my way to look just for you. Because I have faith in your ability to speak and be taken seriously. You don't think your vote weighs the same as seven, but it's certainly more then just one.
> "If I were scum" argument
If we're actually going to entertain player meta to this degree I think you're generically afraid of me in every game we're both in regardless of your alignment, so no, I don't think you'd do anything different with me specifically in mind whether you're town or scum. Particularly since I'm only one person and I know you're smart enough to realize my vote doesn't count for 7 votes at once.
If you're going to entertain player meta, I tell people what I'm like when I'm scum all the time as town. ^_^/ And yet people never believe me. I don't know why I keep jumping onto the stove, I know it's hot but I just can't take walking away. As scum I'm afraid of you. As town I consider you a Person of Interest. You underestimate yourself!
Quote
Maybe instead of Making Shit Up you should be telling us why CF7 should hang.
I don't like his face. Sadly I don't have anything else to go on but that and he just generally feels like he's not there. I can at least see it's not going anywhere though >_> I should at least read SB and decide if he's worth voting or if letting Serela 1/2 get lynched would be better. I guess it would at least save LYLO..

I appear to have been cut 23 times >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:22:24 PM
I dunno a quick skim through your posts again and this is pretty much the closest thing I can find to a scumread excluding the one you have on myself.
Point me to where your other solid scumreads are?
I said "more then one", how many do you expect me to have in D1? D; Anyway, CF7 is close to scumread but he fell off the face of the planet in what is apparently a legitimately gone way that we can't accuse him for lurking over.

And just because you yourself don't talk about non-scumreads doesn't mean doing so has no place for other people. Yes, it's not nearly as important as actually hunting scum, but people having to be held accountable for more things is a tool that can help town in scumhunting.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 02, 2013, 11:24:29 PM
I said "more then one", how many do you expect me to have in D1?
I don't know that's why I was asking since you made it sound like you had a lot.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:24:42 PM
Does that help see where I was coming from better?
Yes, I can see where you mistook it. Anyway, I'm not mad at you or anything! I'm just glad we got the misunderstanding sorted out. Me doing something like that as town is the kind of thing I could imagine someone getting legit I-don't-really-like-you about, because that would be absolutely terrible!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 11:30:05 PM
Shadowy is Serela your scumbuddy? I still remember Gensokyo Holy War where Serela was scumming it up all over the place in the thread and you were all NO HE'S TOTES TOWN.
:V In GHW I never tried to justify why I thought he was town (because it was seriously unjustifyable). Voting Serela would have been so much easier then arguing about him and not having any reasonable scumreads.

Serela do you think Kilgamayan is town?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 11:31:22 PM
Wow that post of mine looks awful. Bleh.

Kilga: I'm not really sure why the wagons forming concerns me so much either but it does. Or at least Validon's did because I couldn't find any reason for him to be scum but it seemed like a few people were fine with taking your lead anyway. That might just be me not grasping what makes Validon look bad very well though. As for Sky Paladin... it's pretty much right in that same post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038573.html#msg1038573) I quoted.

Specifically:
and his notes on Sky Paladin make little sense given Sky Paladin not only has a serious vote down now, but it's on the guy Serela's voting for (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/board,13.0.html).

-and-

So near I can tell, Serela:

- Dislikes Sky Paladin despite Sky Paladin voting for Dormio
I don't really know how to interpret this other than having an issue with Serela suspecting Sky Paladin despite them both voting for Dormio.
I guess, looking back on it, it could just be you having a problem with Serela apparently missing every third post in this thread.

...I don't type nearly quickly enough for this.

scum post imo
oh noooooo

Cheez quotes posts about me being confused why Kilga is being mad at me, and then says "nevermind I should vote Serela"

I don't get how that train of thought is supposed to work >_> Kilga misinterpreted something I said, proceeded to make accusations at me, I was really confused because I had no idea what he was talking about. How does that make me scum?
...Huh? I was focused on how you noticed Kilga's huge post against you for the first time and then proceeded to ask him questions about things that were answered in the post without reading it first.
I think.
...This is assuming I interpreted all of your posts correctly in light of the rush of trying to keep up with a solid page of new things people were saying but I think I failed in that regard actually.

Okay taking my time here sounds like a good idea. That and maybe eating food so I can think well.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:32:07 PM
Shadoweh:I think Kilgamayan is a good enough player and I am an infuriating enough one that he could easily be either alignment and there's much higher priority things to pay attention to right now?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:33:29 PM
Quote
I guess, looking back on it, it could just be you having a problem with Serela apparently missing every third post in this thread.
Sadly I seem to have actually done this for all of early day 1

I... I swear I'm better now
really
I don't normally do that
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 11:35:04 PM
Shadoweh:I think Kilgamayan is a good enough player and I am an infuriating enough one that he could easily be either alignment and there's much higher priority things to pay attention to right now?
You're addressing him pretty clearly as a townie. You can't have misunderstandings with scum. What could possibly be a higher priority then sorting you out right now anyways? You gonna get owned
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 11:35:23 PM
I think I completely ignored an important part of Kilga's post by accident.

For the record, I do understand that trying to look like you're contributing more than you are is kind of scummy, but I didn't see Validon as acting that way or putting up that pretense. It's been a while since I read that post of his though, so perhaps I ought to do that again sometime.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:36:23 PM
You're addressing him pretty clearly as a townie. You can't have misunderstandings with scum.
Uh, why can't someone have misunderstandings with scum

Shadoweh that's a pretty dumb assumption!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: DNAbc on November 02, 2013, 11:36:48 PM
Its 7 in the morning and i slept at 4

Look serela's behavior has been scummy. Chances are hes the lynch anyway since time is due.
Plus even if we not lynvh serela we still have to dsal with sb shaow validon cf7 by pure reading.

Its just easier to have a flip as reference.
Not that anything substantial hss been chabged.

Night
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:38:02 PM
Dark there's OVER SIX HOURS LEFT >_>

Dark why are you literally giving up and saying "oh well better not do anything" already.

I'm not even anywhere near as decided of a lynch as you're saying I am.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:38:36 PM
Is it too late to change our minds that Dark is town? :C
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:41:10 PM
Is it too late to change our minds that Dark is town? :C

serela i've had it with you. if you think someone is scummy then make a case.

i dare you.

of course if you're scum then i can see where you're coming from ^_^ ^_^ ^_^
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:42:08 PM
>besides if we didn't just lynch serela then we'd have to deal with other people by reading them
I'm crying here.

I'm not seriously suggesting we lynch Dark (...I think) but dear god that is the most blatant scum!coasting I have ever seen. I can expect absolutely anything from dark!town by now, but, still.

POLLY ARE YOU JUST PICKING ON ME BY NOW
IT'S NOT AS IF I HAVEN'T MADE CASES ON TWO PEOPLE ;_;
I WANTED TO BELIEVE MY ROLEPM MADE YOU TOWN FOR SO LONG BUT THEN I GAVE UP IT WAS TOO HARD
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 11:42:15 PM
You're addressing him pretty clearly as a townie. You can't have misunderstandings with scum.
Even in my current state of not properly comprehending anything I'm pretty sure this is something I wouldn't comprehend anyway

Is it too late to change our minds that Dark is town? :C
No, it's not too late.

That doesn't change the fact that he's almost certainly town anyway and why would you even want this

##Vote: Serela
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 02, 2013, 11:43:11 PM
Because I am voting for SB, I am interested in what he is doing. What he is doing is voting for CF7, at this stage a fairly useless vote. However, CF7 is not doing anything.
CF7 is one of my scum picks. SB is one of my scum picks. Why would scum vote for scum -> when there is no danger.
What's the danger in day1? For scum, it's 1- town lunches a scum, and 2, town lynches not-scum.
Scum want to make non contributing votes on day 1 that appear contributing.
The easiest way to do that is to vote for an afk - town may switch to afk CF7 and pop! SB will have helped lynch scum, therefore appearing town.

Why not help lynch Serela? Because scums want the lynch to fail today regardless if it's town or scum.

I don't think Serela is scum BUT he may be the only viable lynch at this time.
Therefore, in the interests of not giving scum an advantage, I am prepared to sacrifice a probably-townie.

I prefer no lynch. But everybody tells me that's dumb. I hope you are all right.

##unvote
##vote Serela


Sigh cut by Dark saying the same thing. Always too slow .___.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:44:18 PM
oh hey we're at L-2 now! effectively L-1 if you count my vote.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:45:18 PM
but really, you've made weak and ineffective prods at pretty much everyone that has attacked you at some point, saying that they're oh-so-scummy, and then did absolutely nothing about it. how is that not scummy?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:46:03 PM
Cheez did you miss the part where I was mostly kidding >_>

Anyway my fullclaim is that the vote thing with polly is all I have.

For at least half of D1 I thought Polly's in-flavor name being modconfirmed to me made him confirmed not to be an evil vegan, but then I read the flavor again later and realized that it was a silly assumption to make. It also made sense to be weak-masons (no qt or anything) in exchange for our voting restrictions which was why I had been so quick to make that assumption, at first.

But bleh.

Wait WHAT THE FUCK SKYPALADIN THINKS I'M TOWN AND IS VOTING ME ANYWAY I AM NOT THE ONLY VIABLE LYNCH WE HAVE SIX HOURS LEFT
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 02, 2013, 11:46:32 PM
Votecount/Deadline Reminder 1.91

Serela (5): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc, Sky_Paladin, Cheez8
SB (1): PX,
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (1): Kilgamayan
Dormio (0): Serela
CF7 (1): Shadoweh

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in just over 6 hours
Serela is at L-2!

(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:47:07 PM
that's not a full claim `_`

flavor, name, etc this isn't rocket science serela
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:47:40 PM
but really, you've made weak and ineffective prods at pretty much everyone that has attacked you at some point, saying that they're oh-so-scummy, and then did absolutely nothing about it. how is that not scummy?
Polly what the fuck are you even talking about.

My scumreads are Dormio, weaker Shadoweh, and then cf7 if he wasn't gone.

Dormio's attacked me. Shadoweh's DEFENDING me. I don't get what you're saying?

Are you literally saying my half-joking prod at Darkie is scummy? What.

And how have I "done nothing about it"? I've been scumhunting! I have townreads and multiple scumreads! What do you even expect from me oh my god I want to hammer myself so bad but I'm not going to.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 11:48:39 PM
Yes Serela everyone loves hugging you with their vote. Your face just naturally draws them.
If your half-vote gives you super strength now would be a p good time to claim that.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:49:06 PM
Polly shut your dirty mouth BT said flavor was pointless and there was no point in even bothering to talk about why do you care.

You even already know my name.

Oh, I guess there is my rolename, not that it should matter (it's also in the "dumb flavor case category") but whatever it's Town Best Pal.

You are the meanest best pal ever.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:50:15 PM
I'd still LOVE to lynch Dormio but since clearly that's not happening and since EVERYONE IS SAYING I'M THE ONLY VIABLE WAGON WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE
##Unvote ##Vote Shadoweh
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 11:51:22 PM
Scum want to make non contributing votes on day 1 that appear contributing.
The easiest way to do that is to vote for an afk - town may switch to afk CF7 and pop! SB will have helped lynch scum, therefore appearing town.
...?
If scum wanted to appear innocent by lynching other scum (generally doesn't happen) they could just do so, no need to rest their vote on an afk scum.
I thought it was Shadoweh that was voting for CF7 anyway. Was SB doing that too?

Cheez did you miss the part where I was mostly kidding >_>
Yes but it's okay, I don't trust you
Besides, now that I think about it, you and Polly haven't really agreed on anything and Polly's treating you like scum so even if the majority vote limit gets a little lower we're probably gaining a vote by doing this.

There are totally other viable wagons but I'm not really that concerned about voting for yours.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 02, 2013, 11:54:23 PM
Every time I read one of Polly's posts I think "If I actually tried to make a case on Polly I think he'd be a scumread" but then I don't actually do it.
Shadoweh:I think Kilgamayan is a good enough player and I am an infuriating enough one that he could easily be either alignment and there's much higher priority things to pay attention to right now?
Is it too late to change our minds that Dark is town? :C

yes these are all examples of you being a huge weenie. the first one is incredibly obvious. the second one you just avoid reading kilga because you're a wimp. the third one makes it clear that you only unvoted dark because of peer pressure but if you really thought dark was scum then you wouldn't be such a weenie about it, and right now either.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 02, 2013, 11:56:13 PM
:<
Irony is that I could see a me-wagon happening, but only because I'm here to answer people's questions.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 02, 2013, 11:57:18 PM
Polly you're being Misrep King right now.

Stop pretending that if Kilga was scum I'd actually be able to -tell- right now. It's only d1 and I haven't seen anything particularly bad. Reading him harder most likely wouldn't help. Ontop of that, there's no way in hell he'd be getting lynched from a case on me anyway, so yes, there's higher priority things to do right now.

Saying I clearly unvoted Dark from peer pressure earlier is a silly baseless assumption.

SHADOWEH YOU CAN SEE A YOU WAGON HAPPENING BECAUSE THE ONLY THING YOU DO IS DEFEND ME AND THEN NOT SCUMHUNT EVER


Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 02, 2013, 11:58:51 PM
Oh hey posts have calmed down a little bit, probably a good time to go get dinner now. I guess I'll keep my slight but growing suspicion of Shadoweh in mind while I eat but if Serela's been lynched by the time I get back that's alright too.

Also, don't worry, Shadoweh. My growing suspicion has had very little to do with your recent posts.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:02:46 AM
like, polly says "if you really thought dark was scum you would keep voting him"

did you miss all the parts where I don't really think dark is scum
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 12:03:29 AM
Shadowy: I would hope you would look at Serela because he was a notable wagon rather than just because I was suspcious of him. :V Regardless I'm not sure how huge a deal this is anyway because my vote for you wasn't founded on Serelastuffs and I feel like this is distracting from that, particularly since it let you keep going without substantiating or changing your vote for as long as it did.

Cheez: Notice the "his notes on Sky Paladin make little sense" part. Serela was attacking Sky Paladin for jokevoting when Sky Paladin had moved on to a serious vote already. This was/is not a valid attack, hence my comment.

#339 and #340 are a pretty hilarious back-and-forth, especially in light of what I said in #282 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039168.html#msg1039168).

Sky Paladin: As much as I appreciate the Serela vote, there is still a fair amount of time left, so if you don't think Serela is scum, you should be pushing a case and placing your vote on someone you think is scum. Also SB isn't voting CF7.

I'm about ready to switch back to Serela I think, Shadowy (grr) and Polaris (and Dormio in #340) have properly pointed out his recent scumminess, which piles onto everyhing I said about him earlier. Not gonna do it while he's at L-2 though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 12:04:45 AM
Serela if you don't think DNA is scum why are you trying to "subtly" suggest that he is?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:06:44 AM
like, polly says "if you really thought dark was scum you would keep voting him"

did you miss all the parts where I don't really think dark is scum

excuse you, my exact words were "if you really thought dark was scum you wouldn't be such a weenie about it" WHO'S THE MISREP KING NOW
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:07:27 AM
Serela if you don't think DNA is scum why are you trying to "subtly" suggest that he is?
The post is depressingly bad in a scummy way regardless
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:08:29 AM
"well I'm going to keep voting serela because there's no time left and we can only lynch serela
besides even if we didn't we'd have to deal with these other people and have to... like... read them"
>___________________________________>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:09:29 AM
The only reason I'm not hammering myself yet is because I'm holding out on some dim hope the people who haven't posted yet will help this situation in some manner.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 03, 2013, 12:12:00 AM
Oh wtf? I completely misread the last vote tally somehow.

##unvote

It's doubly embarrassing because I said I was payIng attention to it >__> just gonna unvote then have another think.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: SB on November 03, 2013, 12:23:08 AM
hi sorry for disappearing I had stuff to do in the morning that cropped up suddenly, had to do puppy training stuff and then a few hours ago my game on SF ended, and there's something I need to keep an eye on right now. So I'm kind of behind and I'll just state reads rather than responding to things.

I don't get why me sticking to the Dark wagon is scummy, I didn't like his play and that's that. If I cared about how other people thought of me for it I wouldn't have voted him after people started to state that they disliked it. I didn't intend to deflect suspicions away from myself to Serela, I just thought it was scummy to accuse a some people of being scummy for doing something (like they did for myself and Dormio) but not doing it to others.

Polly's press on Serela and general play looks town to me. Kilga's style feels the same.
Shadoweh is bad because she won't seem to do anything that Kilga doesn't like even though she has her own opinions on stuff. Her defending Serela to me is kind of null though, doesn't she try and meta him pretty much every game?
I'm having doubts on Darkninja considering everyone is yelling he's obvtown and I thought the same about the VM hydra in Town Mafia so meh. Head still says he's scum but I'm clearly not getting anywhere with this. I'm definitely not happy with his play though but it looks like the wagon isn't going to far.
Validon isn't so much scummy to me anymore as he is completely forgettable. He has suspicions now at least which is a plus.
I feel like Paladin's claim was a townslip out of him, so there's that, although I'm not super keen on his content.
PX's few posts are scummy tunneling but he's disappeared so I don't really have anything to add on him
Serela's play hasn't made me think much of him, earlygame it felt really empty and now he just seems to be flailing around and hurling suspicions at pretty much everyone. I don't really have a lot new to say on him but I would support a lynch on him.

I'm not seriously suggesting we lynch Dark (...I think) but dear god that is the most blatant scum!coasting I have ever seen. I can expect absolutely anything from dark!town by now, but, still.

Dark is doing a lot of things I don't like, but even I'm not even going to suggest that he's coasting.

I don't think Serela is scum BUT he may be the only viable lynch at this time.
Therefore, in the interests of not giving scum an advantage, I am prepared to sacrifice a probably-townie.

why is sacrificing a townie not giving scum an advantage? It's a dead town player, isn't it?

sorry but i'm kind of really tired right now so this is likely my last post of today. I'll try and pick it up again tomorrow.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:27:35 AM
Okay, yeah, I seriously don't know why I'm even waiting. I have no counterwagon and the chances of one happening pretty much disappeared, and trying to do stuff just made people who didn't originally want to vote me decide to get on my wagon.

##Vote Serela
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:30:04 AM
but serela, self-hammering is scummy. are you scum?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:31:05 AM
(i'm being facetious, by the way, if you couldn't tell)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:31:52 AM
I can't even self-hammer because Sky unvoted!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:32:48 AM
oh.

in that case.

##Unvote
##Vote Serela
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:33:49 AM
polly you were already voting me idk what you're trying to accomplish here
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:35:40 AM
i felt it was appropriate for the situation
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 12:41:59 AM
Serela if you're town stop being defeatist and actually push a case on someone else >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 12:45:02 AM
"well I'm going to keep voting serela because there's no time left and we can only lynch serela
besides even if we didn't we'd have to deal with these other people and have to... like... read them"
>___________________________________>
Actually that first line goes more like "there is next to no reason to change my vote since it's already there because of actual suspicions I have"
The second line is pretty accurate though and that makes me laugh.

But then you go and try to hammer yourself and it didn't even work what are you doing. I can't even read this as a defeatist town tell because you don't have enough votes anymore and it makes you look even scummier somehow.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:49:19 AM
uh you guys realize darkninja was saying the equivalent of "having a flip as information for the next day's lynch is better than having no flip and having to lynch on only reads" `_`
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:50:29 AM
which is basically the entire motk lynch philosophy stated differently
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 12:51:48 AM
I had been entertaining the thought of Polly being scum during dinner but that requires you to be town and I just keep having trouble believing it.

And yes I do realize that's exactly what Darkie means, and I agree with him, but the way Serela put it is pretty close to the way Darkie put it and it just makes me chuckle.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 12:53:06 AM
Anyway I'm 100% sure that Serela is scum. I can't possibly see how Serela could be town after this >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 03, 2013, 12:54:55 AM
Votecount 1.92

Serela (6): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc, Serela, Cheez8,
SB (1): PX
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (1): Kilgamayan
CF7 (1): Shadoweh
Not Voting: Sky_Paladin

It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in just over 5 hours
Serela is at L-1!

(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 03, 2013, 12:56:56 AM
Let's flip Serela!!

##Vote Shadoweh

Heh heh heh, just messing with you. 

So, why Shadoweh?  The same logic as before re: SB votes for CF7, but applied to Shadoweh.  Who is, incidentally, one of my magic 3. 

I will have one more chance to check the thread before phase end, and that's it from me, in about an hour. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 12:58:13 AM
Yeah I'm willing to hammer Serela at this point (as much as I'll hold off for a little while longer since we have the time). I still don't see the townie effort.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 03, 2013, 12:58:59 AM
To clarify. 

My last discussion was, I think we should vote Serela because it's better than no lynch. 

However, I believe SB is mafia because he was voting for CF7.  I was wrong, oops.  But Shadoweh IS voting for CF7. 

So that's my pick.  I'll be back in an hour to hammer Serela if necessary :/  But here's hoping there's a change before then. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 12:59:40 AM
Serela if you're town stop being defeatist and actually push a case on someone else >_>
Wow because it's totally not like I haven't been doing that for a pretty long time

Literally all it's done is gotten the people who didn't want to vote me, to vote me.

I've already pushed my cases, which no one listened to. My half-joking comments all made people declare me even scummier. And even if all the people who haven't said they want me lynched stauntly refused to vote me, there's still enough leftover to hammer me.

Add this to the fact that there is NOT EVEN A COUNTERWAGON, and chances of one appearing looking dismal.

I have literally no idea what else I could even do anymore.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 01:00:59 AM
If you were half-joking then you were half-serious :derp:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 01:03:37 AM
You could make a case on someone that isn't terrible? >_> It's not like you have anything to lose.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:07:24 AM
Like who? >_> The latter half of the day is mostly about me (especially on people I might consider casing like Polly) and the early half is stupid ed1 stuff I never can get anything from no matter how hard I look, which is probably more the half the reason I get into this kind of mess on a regular basis on the first place.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 01:08:17 AM
Honestly, I could vote for Shadoweh pretty easily right now. Are we doing that? That'd be cool. I'm at least a little more comfortable with it than Serela's wagon right now (although a good bit less confident about it, it's just that all these nagging doubts I have for Serela aren't there for her)

A couple cuts but that doesn't matter
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 01:08:51 AM
serela stop being such a weenie and make a case
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:09:33 AM
mostly about me and the darkie wagon being bad* I guess?

I'm not paying much attention to trying to say accurate things anymore because I don't care anymore either. Okay, let's say I didn't get lynched. Everyone's going to hound me tomorrow and it's not going to get better, not taking into consideration it'd take a miracle for me to get that far.

I am so done with this game.

cut by cheez, I mean if you want to vote for shadoweh I'm still all for that, if people will actually start voting someone who isn't me I'm going to get over my bad mood eventually but UGH
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 01:11:39 AM
My half-joking comments all made people declare me even scummier.
By the way I did actually think this over during dinner and realized it was a pretty poor reason for me to stick with
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:13:06 AM
polly go stuff it you're mean

Person who I didn't case yet? CF7. Guess where he is? NOT HERE FOR THE LATTER HALF OF D1. Other people I'd kind of like to lynch in some capacity? Okay, yes, I'd kind of like to lynch Darkie. No, I wouldn't want to lynch him before almost anyone else I have a bad read on. No, there's almost nothing to say on that matter that isn't obvious, anyway.

Case on Polly? What am I going to do, most of his content is about me anyway. I can't remember what else he's said anymore because he's mean. :C

Ugh I guess I could go reread Polly. Everyone else I don't even want to lynch. Apart from Dormio/Shadoweh but I've already cased them about as much as can be expected. I don't even want to reread Polly though. I GUESS I WILL. Fine be right back.

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:14:47 AM
if anyone wants to say "why not validon" no I don't want to lynch validon get out

He's lurking in the back of half or more of the game's read list as "I guess I kind of don't really like him" somewhere and I don't know why. I don't think he's scum right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 01:15:23 AM
Mmmmm...

##Unvote
##Vote Shadoweh

At least because, if Serela's going to get lynched, there'd better be enough people voting WITHOUT Serela's help for that to happen.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 01:16:38 AM
That plus I'm clearly still wavering on this opinion. And the ones I have for everyone else. Except Shadoweh.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 01:17:07 AM
Serela you could always push Shadowy, there are a few people willing to vote for/voting for her already and it's not like a proper case on her is impossible or even hard to make. You even already (allegedly) believe in it! I have no idea how you've missed this possibility so many times in the last thirty minutes or so.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 01:17:19 AM
Eliminate the vile scum from the face of our Earth.
Even if its a misfire we can deal with that if its now.
Quote from: Polaris
wind because i get to say one of the words myself
Somehow he didn't say anything useful again and the whole post is pretty much just water.
But in my deepest darkest heart of hearts, I have to admit I don't have a reading either way and I'm just screwing around.  Sigh.

(http://i.imgur.com/WR5PwQf.gif)

##goplanet

this isn't even hard anymore
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 01:17:27 AM
^ by the way that's fake
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:18:01 AM
You all decide to vote Shadoweh after I give up. I hate you all. ;_;

##unvote
##vote shadoweh


but yes I'll go reread polly because I can't stop paying attention to the game even when it's put me in a BLEH mood which almost -never- happens from mafia, I'm like the last person that happens to

Cut by Kilga. Kilga you know I was voting Shadoweh earlier! And I've been pushing Shadoweh FOR A GOOD WHILE TOO

BUT NOTHING HAPPENED
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 01:20:26 AM
And then things started happening in her direction and you sat there and continued being defeatist! I would think TownSerela would see a possible counterwagon forming on someone he thought was scum and be all over that shit without needing to be prompted to do so.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 01:21:48 AM
...I can't actually seem to remember where you made a case against Shadoweh but okay. It's not like I've gone back over anything since Day 6 or so even once yet.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 01:22:13 AM
...let's make that page 6
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:23:14 AM
And then things started happening in her direction and you sat there
No. Things were happening in Shadoweh's direction and it was still at the point where I seemed to have a decent chance. And I kept pushing for Dormio (with some shadoweh on the side)

And then I even voted Shadoweh!

And then everyone started going "meh let's just lynch serela" and Shadoweh just seemed to completely drop off the map on everyone until just right now. >_> Then I gave up because even when I finally went to Shadoweh, which people theoretically accepted as a lynch, nobody seemed to actually want to lynch her anymore.

Anyway this is distracting me from starting that reread. It's probably not going to get anywhere anyway but W/E
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 03, 2013, 01:26:38 AM
Votecount 1.93

Serela (3): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc
SB (1): PX
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (3): Kilgamayan, Serela, Cheez8, Sky_Paladin
CF7 (1): Shadoweh


It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in just over 4 and a half hours
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:33:28 AM
I reread polly, but all I really have to say is that I don't like polly after he started getting caught up on me but because ~*~me~*~ that doesn't really make him scum either I guess

tbh this reread went the exact same way I assumed it would (ed1 stuff is null forever, later it's all about me, I forgot the parts where Polly wants to lynch Shadoweh because my brain erased memories of polly that are not painful betrayal from the person I am supposedly a Town Best Pal with)

the amount of read progress I actually have come up with this d1 is stunning to myself because normally I just end up with something almost to the point of (if not simply being) "too little content can't get anything worth investing into on anyone" like I did on polly just now
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:36:07 AM
like all polly has from the earlier part of the day is some minor prods on validon (whom was his vote)

later it's serela/shadoweh in other words identical to most of the players in this game and with Shadoweh the reasons for such are pretty darn obvious
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 01:37:45 AM
Then maybe you should invest time in digging up and rehashing why people should vote Shadowy ahead of you! Polaris is not going to get lynched today, stop wasting time on him! I really shouldn't be needing to hold a townie hand through this process!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:42:04 AM
BUT I ALREADY DID THAT

Besides the reasons for voting Shadoweh are so plain it takes a single sentence (that I've said several times in the past page or two) to explain

1.Shadoweh hasn't done jack shit but defend me
2.Shadoweh's scumhunting involved a throwaway comment that SB hadn't unvoted Darkie, and voting cf7 with literally no explanation

I guess 3 would be Shadoweh keeps posting and posting and posting and doing absolutely nothing half-useful?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:43:16 AM
I wasted time on Polaris because people kept yelling at me to case someone >_> I mean I already did Shadoweh and Dormio so I figured there was no point in restating it again.

And Polly specifically has been yelling at me over not trying to make a scum case on him yet
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 03, 2013, 01:52:10 AM
I am so surpruised by trhis turn of events. :V
Vanilla Town by the way.
This wagon is dreadful for the amount of bad lynching Serela is.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 01:53:09 AM
Shadoweh's being my counterwagon and she still says the wagon on me is bad. :V
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 02:00:11 AM
I just had something occur to me. It's something trustworthy this time.

Shadoweh is, at the very least, suspicious. She's done little in terms of actually contributing, then defended Serela a lot. I can't really find anything supporting her being town.
Serela, instead of just acknowledging or receiving this defense, actually grew suspicious of Shadoweh and voted her because of it.
If Shadoweh is scum (and she probably is) then Serela isn't.

It's that simple. I really don't know how I kept missing this before. Also apparently Polly has some suspicions towards Shadoweh (unless I'm just misreading) so if that's the case, what the heck are you doing? Get your vote back over here on Shadoweh where it belongs.

Same thing goes for anyone else with suspicions towards Shadoweh but still voting for Serela.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Polaris on November 03, 2013, 02:09:41 AM
excuse you I 100% think serela is scum. why would i unvote 100% scum for someone who is <100% scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 02:14:18 AM
It's entirely possible they're scum together and are trying distancing tactics. I would be 0% surprised if they were scumbuddies, Gensokyo Holy War jokes aside.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 02:15:00 AM
GHW was sad because it was my favorite possible scumteam and we all went down like a sack of wet concrete.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 02:18:02 AM
(ftr scum slapfighting on Day 1 is not unheard of, UncertainKitten and I dropped hot fire all over each other in Bamboo Forest Mafia and the Serela/Shadowy interactions in this game aren't even in the same zip code as those ones)

Serela this is still a whole lot of lack of effort from you. Kinda like Shadowy! I have no idea why both of you are so content to twiddle your thumbs unless you're being prompted to do something, particularly right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 02:20:57 AM
what

are you implying I've sat around twiddling my fingers this game

what

I'm going to go in a corner and cry now

seriously
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 03, 2013, 02:21:28 AM
Lol this is silly

Vote Serela

Reception time, food :D
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 02:21:56 AM
I mean the times I haven't been posting fanatically are the times I've been asleep or at work because I've been working every day

hi px I don't like you :C
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 02:36:26 AM
Serela you're sitting here doing nothing meaningful right now when you could very well end up being the day's lynch. If you're town you should be fighting to get a scumread lynched as much as you can (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,13138.msg870901.html#msg870901).
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 03, 2013, 02:36:36 AM
Votecount 1.94

Serela (4): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc, PX
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (3): Kilgamayan, Serela, Cheez8, Sky_Paladin
CF7 (1): Shadoweh


It's 7 votes to lynch. Deadline in ~ 3 Hours 23 minuites
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131103T08&p0=676&msg=Day+1+End)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 02:40:08 AM
Kilga I seriously don't know what you're expecting me to do here >_> The case on Shadoweh is plain as day and I already restated it. What the fuck do you expect me to do, yell at her more?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 02:40:44 AM
Yell at people not voting for her to vote for her over you, maybe?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 03, 2013, 02:44:56 AM
This is my last post before I have to go and then phase end. 

I think Serela is doing basically nothing to dig up scum despite obvious reads of Shadoweh and a few others.  I totally forgot about PX to be honest. 

The reluctance of Serela and Shadoweh to contest each other is really a big red flag for me, especially as they are, now, both up for lynch. 

My main reason for thinking Serela was town was because of meta, specfically, I didn't think the role would be a scum one.  But then they haven't roleclaimed properly and then tried to kill themselves. 

Some people think it's likely one of the best pals is scum; I'm inclined to agree after all.  That way both teams are disadvantaged in the same way. 

I am also annoyed that Serela may be spared through no real effort of their own and then suddenly wagonswitch on to Shadoweh. 

I was really annoyed when last game Dan was at -1 then we lynched some random towny (Polaris). 

So for my last post of this phase I am going to vote Serela after all. 

##Unvote
Vote Serela


I'm wrong no matter what.  Either he's a towny and I should have gone with my gut feeling from the start of the day, or he's scum and I was wrong about my meta reasoning.  I don't feel good either way. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 03, 2013, 02:45:44 AM
Quote
Yell at people not voting for her to vote for her over you, maybe?

This^^

It feels more and more like Serela and Shadoweh are scumbuddies. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 02:49:53 AM
I don't really see how that's supposed to work in this case, and I'm used to yelling at people while they ignore me on a regular basis (kaori/uesugi in swordgirls, rawr in whichever mafia game he was scum that did literally nothing and somehow EVERYONE QUICKLYNCHED ME D4 OR SO BEFORE I POSTED A SINGLE TIME because saying rawr was scum was so terrible apparently, oh yes welcome to nhk)

I could keep going but no point etc

I could ask why PX is voting me over Shadoweh, but when it comes down to it, Shadoweh is a lurker lynch and I've actually done things people can point at and complain about and I can't really defend against them any more then I already have. It's kind of a "decide what you want to lynch" point. I've run out of extra things I can do to try to prove I'm townie through providing content AFAIK

Quote
The reluctance of Serela and Shadoweh to contest each other is really a big red flag for me, especially as they are, now, both up for lynch. 
ugh

I am so unreluctant to go after shadoweh
I was voting her before I gave up and only stopped because all interest in her seemed to go down the toilet and numerous people declared a non-serela lynch a lost cause and left.

And it's so annoying how many people saying "serela's not even trying to stop it" when I've been trying like mad the past several hours.

Anyway, there's enough votes for me to hammer myself now, and even after the recent boost of willingness to lynch shadoweh, the two voteswitches onto me seem to have pretty cemented the deal here. >_> There's no way it's not ending like this.

##Vote Serela
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: PX on November 03, 2013, 02:51:32 AM
Lol jk. I feel like they'll both flip town so back to voting scum.

vote SB
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 02:54:14 AM
I'm wrong no matter what.  Either he's a towny and I should have gone with my gut feeling from the start of the day, or he's scum and I was wrong about my meta reasoning.  I don't feel good either way. 
I do a lot of being wrong about things anyway so you don't really have to worry about that.

oh yeah and
It's entirely possible they're scum together and are trying distancing tactics. I would be 0% surprised if they were scumbuddies, Gensokyo Holy War jokes aside.
I do realize this now, but I had completely failed to notice what I was saying earlier in the first place and so once I noticed it I posted it like it was some sort of important and meaningful revelation when in reality it was probably what people could observe if their brains functioned properly for about half a minute.


Cut...
wait isn't that it for the day though
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 02:57:17 AM
You're allowed to keep talking until the flips and night is announced according to the rules, but yes, the day should be over now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 02:57:55 AM
welp
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 02:58:20 AM
don't regret it because px not voting me wouldn't have done anything but slightly delayed the inevitable >_> There was nowhere near enough support for a shadoweh lynch over me, at least not from people ACTUALLY PRESENT
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 03, 2013, 02:59:29 AM
Serela/Shadowy/SB STotY 2013 see you all in the graveyard probably
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 03, 2013, 03:02:18 AM
Oh, cool. And uh... hm.

I probably won't know how to feel about this outcome until the flip comes, honestly. And then I still won't for a while.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 03:04:46 AM
For what my totally unreliable word is worth, I really am town!

Wish I could have hammered myself before Paladin unvoted the first time because the rest of the day practically felt like me getting prodded with a stick to conform to expectations that there was no way for me to actually live up to.

BUT I DIGRESS

I AM OUT OF THIS GAME

YESSSSSSS GOODBYE
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Raikaria on November 03, 2013, 03:05:13 AM
I don't really see how that's supposed to work in this case, and I'm used to yelling at people while they ignore me on a regular basis (kaori/uesugi in swordgirls, rawr in whichever mafia game he was scum that did literally nothing and somehow EVERYONE QUICKLYNCHED ME D4 OR SO BEFORE I POSTED A SINGLE TIME because saying rawr was scum was so terrible apparently, oh yes welcome to nhk)

I could keep going but no point etc

I could ask why PX is voting me over Shadoweh, but when it comes down to it, Shadoweh is a lurker lynch and I've actually done things people can point at and complain about and I can't really defend against them any more then I already have. It's kind of a "decide what you want to lynch" point. I've run out of extra things I can do to try to prove I'm townie through providing content AFAIK
ugh

I am so unreluctant to go after shadoweh
I was voting her before I gave up and only stopped because all interest in her seemed to go down the toilet and numerous people declared a non-serela lynch a lost cause and left.

And it's so annoying how many people saying "serela's not even trying to stop it" when I've been trying like mad the past several hours.

Anyway, there's enough votes for me to hammer myself now, and even after the recent boost of willingness to lynch shadoweh, the two voteswitches onto me seem to have pretty cemented the deal here. >_> There's no way it's not ending like this.

##Vote Serela

HAMMER SHUT UP STOP VOTING

Votecount at this point:

Votecount 1.9 recurring

Serela (7): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc, PX, Serela, Sky_Paladin

Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (2): Kilgamayan, Cheez8,
CF7 (1): Shadoweh


It's 7 votes to lynch.

Twilight will be until BT posts the flip. [Gotta align phases to timezones for mods.]

No Flip till BT gets on for the above reason.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 03:16:46 AM
If I lived to day 2 I likely would have requested a replacement anyway.

Unless maybe if the real lynch flipped scum, because then everyone (except darkie) would probably leave me alone, and since after a day or two (irl time) I probably would have gotten over it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Serela on November 03, 2013, 03:20:20 AM
Unless maybe if the real lynch flipped scum, because then everyone (except darkie) would probably leave me alone
actually no because everyone is talking about shadoweh+serela scumbuddies ^_______________________________________^
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: BT on November 03, 2013, 05:12:51 AM
Six pages? Good thing I don't have to read any of them.

This flip is sponsored by the above message.

Quote
Welcome to Justice Juice Mafia, Serela! You're Bushido Banana. You're the best fighter of your kind, combining tactics, strength and appeal. You also have a thing against those smartasses with the hi-tech machinery, though you plan on pulling your weight here whatever happens. It's obvious that stopping the scumbags comes first.

Your role is Town Best Pal. Having been an acquaitance of [snipped] for a long time, you've decided to crack this case together. For as long as both of you are alive, you must vote the same person for your votes to count. [snipped] is played by Polaris.

You win when all evildoers are eliminated.

It is now Night 1. Uh it's going to be a problem updating in exactly 24 hours so send all actions in 23 hours.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131104T06&p0=110&msg=Night+1)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: BT on November 03, 2013, 05:54:50 AM
Quote from: bars
CF7 - 982
Darkninjaabc - 582
PX - 468
Validon98 - 443
Everyone else - 400

(This is for the start of D2.)

Public service announcement: Second post is updated with all VCs for convenience.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (NIGHT 1)
Post by: BT on November 03, 2013, 06:46:07 PM
NekoNekoRex replaces CF7. Deadline in 9 hours and 15 minutes.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (NIGHT 1)
Post by: BT on November 04, 2013, 04:18:06 AM
You're awake, but barely - the alarm clock had issues. Unfortunately, one resident seems to be missing.

(It's SB.)

Quote
Welcome to Justice Juice Mafia, SB! You're Omnipresent Onion. You're a potent medium whose power transcends dimensions. Though you may not eavesdrop on conversations, you can communicate with distant others effortlessly. You can basically act like a big transmitter for your own sound waves, but you don't like to think of yourself that way.

Your role is Town Restless Spirit. Should you be sent to the next dimension in the sky by an evil kill, you will still be able to project your votes to the thread normally. (and only votes - don't abuse the system!) As death is kind of a big deal, this will last one full day, after which you'll finally rest in peace.

You win when all evildoers are eliminated.

Votecount 2.1

Not Voting: (11) Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, SB, NekoNekoRex, Cheez8, Validon98, Dormio, PX, Kilgamayan, Shadoweh, Polaris

Day 2 lasts 73 hours and requires a majority of 6 votes to lynch.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 04, 2013, 04:20:24 AM
It's night phase and though I would really like to sit around and listen to Kyoukai no Kanata OP/ED while wallowing in despair until the day phase starts, I guess I'm obligated to prepare some sort of opening wall post to start off at the beginning of the day phase as is the accepted standard these days.

Opening

First off I suppose I should apologize to Serela because I know being mislynched feels bad so I promised myself to show sympathy to all those who I end up mislynching. Hopefully things will go better for you next time! (Of course, hammering yourself is 100% scum no matter the circumstances so I am tempted to say that BT is a bastard mod for including a Scum Best Pal Death Godmother in the game.)

Let's proceed forward to some inconsequential setup discussion/speculation before we get to the anything important, but the Best Pal role was kind of a handicap for town so it sure would've been an interesting plot twist if one of the pals was a scumbag who had some control over the votes made but I guess that wasn't the case. Perhaps it was just worse than it could have been because the supposed Best Pals were at odds with each other from the very beginning. At least I have control over my own vote now. ^_^V

If you're reading for content then you've probably skipped the entire section above which is totally ok because now it's time for the important stuff to happen.

Shadoweh

I get the feeling I don't even need to explain the matter regarding Shadoweh, but I suppose I should do so because a higher power is telling me that it's a good idea. First of all, Shadoweh parks her vote on CF7 with no reasoning other than her own intuition, which shouldn't even need to be said is untrustworthy, because I'm sure that Shadoweh is also not a clairvoyant. Unless Shadoweh would like to tell us about her newfound psychic powers, which would be pretty cool.

The end of day pseudoclimax shows that Shadoweh does not seem very concerned about lynching scum or even her own survival. I hope it isn't exaggerating to say that Shadoweh was the counterwagon to Serela, and yet Shadoweh has little to say other than she could see her own wagon happening, implying that she would let it happen if it did. I also don't like how she uses meta arguments and WIFOM as excuses. Her general disinterest in scumhunting feels very untowny in general and, as much as I would like to be lenient for extenuating circumstances, I feel that Shadoweh could show a better effort as town even in spite of whatever is happening.

##Vote Shadoweh

(removed an entire section on SB because he ended up being the NK but if not for that I would've had THREE people for scum ok)

PX

Another person who has something going on in Real Life that I have to account for, but what bothers me is PX's attempt to switch off Serela after contributing to the wagon, saying that he didn't think Serela was scum in the first place. What's the deal with that? Could PX be scum with knowledge of alignments who decided to jump off the Serela wagon to avoid the repercussions of voting town with no real reason? What are PX's true intentions? And most importantly, what is the meaning behind this picture of PX holding hands with a girl in front of Disney World? Find out the answers to these questions in next week's episode of... Justice Juice Mafia!

Honorable mentions

CF7 could be scum but it is fairly impossible to tell since he is MIA and all that. Hopefully NNR can pick things up for him.

Validon is unremarkable and needs to start Posting More Things. I can't give bonus points for "being on Serela" anymore because he ended up flipping town, so do your best, Validon.

I dunno what to say about Cheez, Sky Palladium, and Dormio but I figure I should mention them for posterity. It really depends on where things go from here for them. Kilga and Darkninja can also fall under this category. I shouldn't need to say Post More Things but do so anyway so that there's more to look at.

Closing

I didn't plan anything for a proper closing so I'll just say some platitudinal stuff for the sake of ending things on a positive note. Don't lose hope, everyone. You must not give into despair. If we all work together, we can pull through this with the power of friendship. You can do it if you believe in yourself. Don't give up.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 04, 2013, 04:22:06 AM
Actually NK analysis might be feasible here. SB is kind of a weird choice for the kill so I might have to rethink my overnight Shadoweh vote.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 04, 2013, 04:23:09 AM
Rather I might have to rethink my entire scum picks.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 04, 2013, 04:24:23 AM
i regret even bothering to prepare a post beforehand i hate you all
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 04:27:04 AM
Yeah I want to bludgeon Shadowy in the face for her D1 but I think she'd be beyond stupid to kill SB.

I'm back to thinking Validon right now, he and PX stuck out the most to me in terms of the people on the Serela wagon. I might have to rethink Dormio too. Gimme a moment to compare them again before casting my pre-bed vote. Shadowy and SB were actually my top two day-opening choices and seeing SB die kind of throws a wrench into that.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 04, 2013, 04:32:23 AM
SB was a prime suspect for being scum.  Therefore killing him was probably a vig-hit.  Then, where was the night kill from scum?  I don't get it.  Maybe it went on somebody bulletproof or they were afk (*cough* CF7). 

I am going to Kobe in about 5 minutes so I don't have time to put up anything; I'll be back in about six hours and say stuff then. 

About Serela - My scum picks were Shadoweh, SB and CF7.  SB is dead.  CF7 got subbed for NekoNekoRex so that's kind of oh well.  The reason I voted for Serela in the end was because he had posted something like fifty times without any meaningful content other than "dont vote for me, wait until (some other people have put up a reason to vote for them instead)" and was basically just...posting...over and over and over.  The water had become so muddy it was basically impossible to do any kind of good read on other players.  I think if Serela had actually stopped posting it would have allowed people to focus on other suspects like Shadoweh.  In the end I feel Serela basically got killed because they posted so many times nobody else could get a word in, and Serela ignored good suggestions from other players about how they could get out of it.  I want to feel bad because I was involved in a mislynch but I feel relief instead for 'thank God that noise is out of the way.'  So that's bad. 

Anyway. 

I'm voting for Shadoweh for now; I'll be back in a few hours to do another read. 

##Vote Shadoweh

Also, about SB - note that in his role ability it says 'by an evil kill'.  Maybe he can't vote if killed by town?

Well SB, try and put in a vote and see if you can - if you can't do it, then we know it was a teamkill, and CF7/Neko is now suspicious. 
If you CAN vote, then town needs to think why on earth scum would have gone for SB over the many other obvious candidates, eg, half of town who thought SB was scum...
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 04:33:56 AM
Then again I don't know why PX would kill SB when attacking SB was like 90% of his activity yesterday and it wouldn't have been hard to make a continued SB case today.

Lemme tentatively throw a ##Vote: Validon down right now while I do that quick review.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 04, 2013, 04:36:38 AM
So I am here

I like brownies

In fact I ate so many that I am currently experencing  a sugar buss the liked of which no man has ever experiencedc

I had gut on kilga but to be honest I only skimmed like half the thread, I do better when I'm actually in the muck of things

I will be back when I am done being the hyperest thing on te plante
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 04:38:25 AM
Honestly Dormio still sticks out to me as one of the biggest offenders out of the Serela votes (and town in general but especially in light of Serela's flip.) Maybe Validon or PX too but it's not like either of them have really posted enough so far.

I'm also secretly hoping Darkie says something incriminating beyond a doubt because he really does not inspire confidence as a townie. It'd be really convenient for him to slip up but sadly he can only really slip up and prove he's scum if he's scum and that's kind of a long shot.

Geez what was with SB being on everybody's scumpicks yesterday? I mean he seemed vaguely suspect to me but that was it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 04, 2013, 04:40:35 AM
^ Sky Palladium brings up a pretty good point. If SB was not, in fact, the NK then that would change things.

From pure NK analysis (with the assumption that SB is the NK), though, I'd agree with Kilga that Validon looks bad and PX is probably not scum.

##Unvote
##Vote Validon


Was also thinking Cheez and Darkninja, and CF7/NNR is basically a black hole in terms of alignment so there's that.
aaragharrgahgarhga i hate everything
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 04:44:33 AM
SB was a prime suspect for being scum.  Therefore killing him was probably a vig-hit.  Then, where was the night kill from scum?  I don't get it.  Maybe it went on somebody bulletproof or they were afk (*cough* CF7).
...Are you implying that CF7 counted for the entirety of the scum team?

Well SB, try and put in a vote and see if you can - if you can't do it, then we know it was a teamkill, and CF7/Neko is now suspicious. 
If you CAN vote, then town needs to think why on earth scum would have gone for SB over the many other obvious candidates, eg, half of town who thought SB was scum...
Yeah, SB is kind of a boggling nightkill. Personally, I kind of have to wonder if a bus driver is around (not sure how common they are but I'm too used to them.) If it was the intended scum kill, I dunno. Maybe they realized that SB is pretty smart and figured with so many people suspecting him for some reason they could take him out without running the risk of interference before he becomes a greater threat.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 04:47:11 AM
That really just leaves Serela. To be honest I was thinking him as null at the start, but I'm worried about his lack of content that is relevant. Plus I still can't shake the potential of him and Polaris being ITP. Of course, if they were, it would be too obvious, and between the two of the Polaris seems definitely more town. Unless something else comes up with someone else:

##Unvote
##Vote: Serela

Yeah I'm okay with calling Validon scum-on-the-townie-wagon in light of this. The mentioning of the lack of content is nothing special at that point, and it's the only actual legitimate argument (the whole third party/Polaris thing is part-third-party-nonsense and part-filler). There is also this:

My vote is still on Serela for now because I'm not overly convinced by his recent efforts, but I'm willing to change to SB, maybe Shadoweh although I'm not entirely sure about her.

Which does nothing to explain further why Serela is scummy and also leaves Validon open to switch to two other possible wagons with similarly little reasoning for doing so.

Basically Validon spent nearly all of his posts trying to look more active and helpful than he actually did, and he was notably absent for most of the second half of the day, which, while possibly for outside circumstances, does not give him anything anyone can point at as late-in-the-day decisive action of any kind.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 04:47:58 AM
Am here expect dogpile you'll have to wait at least a few more hours for things that are more important then all ya'll sorry.
SB as a kill is mind-boggling.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 04:54:39 AM
Oh huh, I hadn't even thought of SB as not the intended NK. I suppose I was too irritated by seemingly being deemed unworthy of the honor of the N1 NK yet again to think through the other possibilities that have been mentioned.

I still think Validon is quite likely to be scum based on everything I've presented against him throughout the entire game, but if we wait a while and don't see a Chicago Vote from SB, then Shadowy and PX will get thrown right back near the top of the suspicion list.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 04:56:20 AM
SB can vote. He's already listed with the "Not Voting" group.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 04, 2013, 04:58:19 AM
I should've seen that earlier >_> I even remember thinking "oh 11 votes in play that means SB is still voting" and then I forgot
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 05:02:14 AM
I'm not sure if the evilness of the kill really effects whether or not he gets to vote, but assuming the scum team killed him still makes the most sense to me.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 05:06:32 AM
I'M TIRED OKAY ;_;

Well then.

OFFICIAL PRE-BED UNSUBSTANTIATED OPINION POWER RANKINGS

Probably Scum Tier

Validon

Possibly Scum Tier

Dormio
Cheez

??? Tier

NNR
Shadowy
PX

Probably Town Tier

Polaris
Sky Paladin

If You Lynch Him I Will Cry Tier

DNA

As much as I think Shadowy and PX would be dumb to kill SB, (1) they've both been pretty scummy outside of that, and (2) with all due respect to everyone else, there weren't many better options if they considered the possible existence of a doc because I think they'd assume said doc would be all over me. durr hurr player meta but I don't think Shadowy has it in her to knowingly kill Polaris N1, and if not me or him, then who? A sketchy Dormio? A super-sketchy whichever-of-Shadowy-and-PX-isn't-scum-if-they-aren't-scumbuddies? Any of the handful of unpredictable newbies? SB was sketchy too but I think he's good enough to talk himself out of a mislynch and I think they'd know that too.

I think I may have talked myself into reopening the Shadowy/PX door. I need to dwell on this for a bit. Sleep calls right now, though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 05:10:27 AM
That reminds me. Polaris, do you even have a vote or are you pretty much a Tree Stump now?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 04, 2013, 05:11:32 AM
i hope i have a vote, my role pm says only as long as both of us are alive will we have to link our votes ;_; so presumably now that serela's dead i'll have control

wait for the next votecount to see, i guess
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 05:14:16 AM
Goddamn, night kill analysis and player meta. I must be exhauted.

PEOPLE WHO ARE UNSURE ABOUT VALIDON OR DO NOT THINK HE IS LIKELY TO BE SCUM: Please explain to me how the things I quoted in #478 are more indicative of a townie scumhunting and concluding Serela than scum trying to cast a vote for an easy target.

Night!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 05:20:25 AM
(ps I am not saying that because SB died it had to be Shadowy and/or PX that killed him. I'm saying that originally I thought they were both extremely unlikely to kill him, but now realize the logic I used to get to that point is flawed, and thus his death is not nearly as indicative of their towniness as I originally thought. OKAY REALLY LEAVING NOW)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 04, 2013, 05:30:26 AM
Votecount 2.2

Validon98 (2): Kilgamayan, Polaris
Shadoweh (1): Sky_Paladin

Not Voting (8 ): Darkninjaabc, SB, NekoNekoRex, Cheez8, Validon98, Dormio, PX,  Shadoweh

It's 6 to lynch and 71.5 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)

I've had to make this clarification already, so: evil does mean non-town.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 05:36:14 AM
Oh, alright. Good to know.

Kilga makes a pretty good point for Validon but I don't want this day to end TOO super-fast. I'll put off voting for him until the morning when I can confirm that I want to vote for him by thinking straight.

If I forget I said this and start yabbering about someone else just yell at me or something and everything should be all better.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 07:31:32 AM
Okay, falling asleep coma again. Currently fine with Validon case but requires more review. Also need review into looking into dead person. I don't believe in Bus Drivers. :V Kilga's argument is hilarious considering he knows damn well who I would kill unless he were scum with me.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 08:09:29 AM
This game is so maddeningly confusing, we pretty much had the consent that scummy people are sb, shadow, serela and validon.
But both players in this list who are horrendously scummy flips town. Worst I actually bought the scumread on these people. You know what? I am feeling less and less confident on scum!cheez8. Retracting stances should be performed by scum only. But yet somehow this guy kept pushing with weak cases and retracted them on a moment's notice. But considering the fact that he's new to this site and possibly not too experienced with mafia maybe he's just a paranoid town? Can we just avoid the grey area where we give scum more advantage? Reading him as null atm.

To dead sb: I am not coasting on town cred, my internet connection is only available either i borrow a computer or after 8pm when I get off from school. My connection times are verification for that. The essay thing is also real. I can tell you very well it is a 2000 word essay on the human circulatory system. You do not know how much pain I went through detailing the structure of the heart and how blood flows through it. My brain was melting at that time and I am piss tired to contribute. Kilga ranted what I thought of and those which I cannot put to words perfectly I just felt, ''well, there's a scum dead, time to sleep.''

But now I am not certain. Perhaps kilga really is scum.
Let's think back to when cheez defended me. His logic was plain weird which I have pointed out. But then, shortly after it was followed up by an absurdly similar statement rephrasing the idea which I have already stated. His overly friendly manner of addressing me is also rather unsettling. While sure, I was kind of helped by him, I just can't stop thinking now, ''I wouldn't have been lynched then if that argument is really all they've got''. So why did kilga put so much dedication into defending me? An experienced scum who has predicted my fail logic being detrimental to town as everyone kept insisting? Then it clicks together. He plays town hard defending me to confuse town. But not now, I caught you.

Then there's kilga's relatively inactive behavior at the start of the game which if I recall correctly was that ''well smalltalk in d1 start is pointless''. But then d1 smalltalk is the only thing you have in d1 anyway, and then there's your vote. Even if d1 start talk really is as pointless as he has claimed, why would he be not bother to make any contribution, at all? Answer, he has a scum QT to attend to. So comparably, this town smalltalk really is irrelevant to him. For  they would make much more if they contemplate on how and when to jump on someone. Without any transition nor reasoning sans, ''well i felt that was boring so i didn't participate'', then going full throttle in super townie mode is enough to ring all the alarms in me.

##Vote Kilgamayan

DNA is a nice nick, scum. I almost worshipped you too.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 08:18:39 AM
PEOPLE WHO ARE UNSURE ABOUT VALIDON OR DO NOT THINK HE IS LIKELY TO BE SCUM: Please explain to me how the things I quoted in #478 are more indicative of a townie scumhunting and concluding Serela than scum trying to cast a vote for an easy target.
Alright, that's a statement which doesnt go anywhere. Kilga already quoted the worst part of validon's fail accompanied with a bias which is a dead end question with only the answer, ''well validon is scummy.''

(ps I am not saying that because SB died it had to be Shadowy and/or PX that killed him. I'm saying that originally I thought they were both extremely unlikely to kill him, but now realize the logic I used to get to that point is flawed, and thus his death is not nearly as indicative of their towniness as I originally thought. OKAY REALLY LEAVING NOW)
I also cannot imagine someone like kilga contradicting his case provided with how apparantly experienced he is with mafia.

------
I beileve kilga is one among the scum. (I don't want to announce another prediction on scumteam for that it might be misdirecting, not that I have no idea though) They basically saw how likely kilga should be nightkilled by scum if he's town for he's being super helpful to town. So what do they do? They murder another scummy player to discredit their own member's major scumcalls and to instill paranoia in town. Kilga's recent super hyped mood is making my spine shiver also. And there's that he directly addressed how he totally should be shot.

Will be leaving library in 10mins. Seeya in 4 hours.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 08:28:52 AM
Right I believe kilga never even addressed how he kicked from relatively inactive to full throttle most contributive town ever.

After rereading the thread.

I dont know its for the better or worse but anyway.

Seeya all in 4 hours/
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 04, 2013, 09:50:08 AM
Huh. The day started. Anyway.

##Vote Sky Paladin

Why, you may ask?
Well, first of all, there's how he handled the Serela wagon yesterday.
I don't like how wishy-washy he was about the entire ordeal as if he didn't want to stain his hands or something.
Combine that with the apology in his latest post today (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039830.html#msg1039830) and to me it just feels like he really wanted to lynch Serela while not getting his hands dirty.
I mean just look at this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039373.html#msg1039373) where he tries to push Serela as the only possible lynch option for the day while openly stating his disinterest in the wagon.
Like, I think it's too much of an attempt to remain clean or something.

Of course, that's not the only thing that I think is scummy.
There's this thing (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038414.html#msg1038414) which I think was mentioned D1.
Like, I'm seeing this as an attempt to extend the RVS and just create useless noise which doesn't benefit town.
If I tried to explain myself a bit better, I guess this fits into my impression that Sky Palladium is a completely by-the-books kind of guy and this seems like the kind of textbook strategy he would try to employ as scum.

This post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038720.html#msg1038720), as well, parses as little more than fluff to me.
Like, an attempt to look like he's contributing?

OTHER PEOPLE OF INTEREST THAT I'LL MAKE A POST ABOUT SOON. PROBABLY.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 12:08:30 PM
Shadowy I know you would want to kill me. But let's pretend for a moment there's a doc in this game, since that's not an uncommon thing. Who do you think they would have protected last night? Seriously, look at the player list, and consider how sketchy you and SB (and PX too I guess) looked at the end of the day. With that answer in mind, would you really still have gone after me?

Dormio, I think you're making too much of Sky Paladin's Serela vote. Most of the newbies in this game have been hyper-paranoid about wagons and consolidation and whatnot, and once Sky Paladin saw he had more time than he thought he had he went back to voting someone he thought was scum. I don't think too harshly of him for it.

DNA: As near as I can tell, you think I'm scum not being here ED1, trying to get people to agree with my scumreads, and trying to dissuade people from lynching my town reads. Well okay then.  :wat: To at least answer your question about my ED1 activity, the game started when I was asleep, and then I woke up late and went to work in a rush, completely forgetting the game even existed until after I got there. For the other two things, well, I want scum and not town lynched, so...they seem like the logical courses of action?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 01:23:47 PM
...i am more dubious of both you and shadoweh seem to fit together so perfectly like two exact polar opposite magnets.

Kilga. You are a very experienced player. You know that. Out of shadowehs individual short questions there is absolutely no need to address separately. If you are genuinely trying to convict him just lump all your doubts, crumbs and whatever and do it like how you did with serela and me. Nagging serela at d1 end and telling her to counterpush shadow instead of defending himself or fullclaim already sticks out like a sore thumb in your otherwise supertown play.

Your usr of questions as a supposedly experienced townie is also boggling. Questions depending on the wording can be directed to always yield a desired answer. Especially in mafia where you can quote a small part of someones post and stereotype their entire playstyle as scummy. Why have you used questions so much then instead od interpreting and crumbing it all the way back?

Your accusations on shadoweh lacks material and comes down to us(at least me) as just bussing. You keep telling us to read him ourselves hes posting so little hes coasting. But i simply just dont agree thats a scumtell now that i thijk about it. Shadows practically a troll last game and even in when hes modding which you should be even more familiar with rhan me. therew no material that knocks the nail in the coffin for scumshadow. Which is weird from you considering how well you can analyze.
(Yes stereotyping from past games isnt practically reliable but it still information)

Please address that. Kilga. And if you can do pl
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 03:04:18 PM
And then theres my wild guess.

Consider kilga's content and his presence. I personally expect scum to be out for his blood.
He himself addressed that sooner than anyone would. Which is rather weird. If scum really is so retarded to not target him why would he want to remind them? And then theres the crazy vig suspicion theory which says, "well the doc saved someone and town shot the scummy people." But then again. If this is really an unconditional vig usalabe on d1asap it must be a Xshot ability or balanced by either killblocking roles or superscums. This actually makes more sense if you want to insist kilga is town. But setup is claimed by mod to be more vanilla aligned. That makes absurdly op scum not a thing of concern if bt is to be trusted. And
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 03:16:41 PM
It's cold and I have very little time. In order:

- Not answering questions directed at you is rude and unhelpful, so of course I'm going to do this.
- Serela had already fullclaimed and more or less given up on defending himself. In Mafia, the best defense is a good offense, particularly when you're under pressure. If telling people not to vote for you isn't going anywhere, show them why they should vote for someone else instead of you.
- I ask questions because I want to know reasons and motivations. Being right doesn't automatically make you town, and being wrong doesn't automatically make you scum. It's all about the "why". People that are wrong but had good reasons are likely to just be mistaken townies. People that are right for shit reasons (or wrong for shit reasons) are likely to be scum unable to form proper cases.
- Your assessment of my Shadowy case is factually incorrect. Please reread what I've actually brought to bear against her.

Cut by setup speculation that I don't have time to get into, but I don't think I really need to hurry to do that given what it is.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 03:43:24 PM
Right, I forgot that the circumstances of this morning will not actually allow me to think straight for a while.

Now I'm going to put of voting for Validon until the next time I can think straight. Same for successfully reading through those posts because there's no way I'll grasp Darkie's logic without a clear head and I'd also want to make sure that other people's summaries of his logic aren't misrepresentations before I buy them.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 03:46:36 PM
Oh hey got a few more minutes.

Small clarification on the "factually incorrect" Shadowy case assessment thing: I did accuse her of floating along with barely a presence. I made this accusation exactly once, and it is the only aspect of my case that I didn't press. The useless CF7 vote and Making Stuff Up About SB were far worse an I've focused on them a lot more.

For the latest DNA post, I'm sure scum didn't forget I was playing when they chose their NK, and the crazy vig theory has been debunked.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 04, 2013, 04:03:51 PM
Votecount 2.3

Validon98 (2): Kilgamayan, Polaris
Shadoweh (1): Sky_Paladin
Kilgamayan (1): Darkninjaabc
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio

Not Voting (6): SB, NekoNekoRex, Cheez8, Validon98, PX,  Shadoweh

It's 6 to lynch and 61 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 04, 2013, 04:08:56 PM
I'm interested in why SB was killed.  On the surface, it's strategically a poor scum choice.  They should usually go for somebody who either is suspected to have a role, or is generally accepted as town by a majority of players, is perceived as a threat for some reason (usually by being accurate with scum reads), or killing off the player benefits the scum in some way (e.g. by potentially clearing a scum who was voting to kill the victim, shock!).  Otherwise, it's just a random killing.  I want to believe that SB wasn't randomly picked.  That's my assumption before going into this analysis. 

So let's have a look at the interactions with SB.  First of all, we've got mod confirmation that SB was killed by scum; so we can assume a couple of things from this which I'll get to when they're relevant. 

page 2:  SB votes Shadoweh. 
page 3:  SB votes for DNA. 
page 3:  PX votes for SB. 
page 3:  SB says:

Quote
100% accurate RVS Scumteam: Dark, Serela, Validon

Now watch me die night 1. I'd be in stitches if I did.

page 4:  SB votes for Validon. 
page 7:  PX revotes for SB. 
page 8:  After a couple of pages back and forth with DNA, SB votes for DNA. 
page 8:  Sky_Paladin votes for SB. 
page 10:  SB argues with PX about Dark. 
page 16:  PX votes for SB (but its after hammer). 
page 17:  SB goes pop :/

So, why was SB killed?
Option 1 - SB may have had some useful role. 
Impossible - it was night 1 and SB had made no claim. 

Option 2 - was SB generally accepted as town?
Not really, in fact, there were many who considered him to be potential scum rather than null reads. 

Option 3 - Appears to have good reads on who the scum are. 
SB implicated - DNA, Validon, Serela.  Serela is dead so let's rule him out. 

Option 4 - Will implicate another towny in some way
Not really relevant - we know scum killed SB, not vig, so any of the people who wanted him flipped - myself, Kilga, possibly PX - aren't responsible for killing him.  In short, if any of us were scum, we would almost certainly have gone for different targets.  Personally, I would have killed DNA as he's stated he has a role and is generally accepted to be town.  There's also been no interaction between Dark and myself to link back to me. 

So far from this read the strongest picks are DNA and Validon.  SB was actually voting for Validon when he died.  Validon seems like a good case. 

I'm going to keep my vote on Shadoweh though while I sleep on it.  I'm interested to see what others have to say. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 04, 2013, 04:13:35 PM
Also this:

DNA
Quote
Consider kilga's content and his presence. I personally expect scum to be out for his blood.

Isn't that what you're doing right now?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 04, 2013, 04:22:21 PM
Right, Dormio. 

Quote
I don't like how wishy-washy he was about the entire ordeal as if he didn't want to stain his hands or something.

Pretty much this.  I thought Serela was town, and stated so pretty much every post.  By the last part of the day it was clear we were either going to no lynch or Serela lynch.  I had alternatively pushed Shadoweh and SB.  I got some ground with Shadoweh but I had to leave for work before phase end.  So I switched my vote again.  At this point, on day 1, I would have preferred a no lynch.  However everybody is always telling me that apparently that's the worst thing and even if we cleared Serela for day 1, he'd probably be up for it again in day 2 just because of how shady they were being.  I personally needed Serela to stop posting because it was making it much harder to physically read the thread.  I was almost certain they were town but in the last part of the day I started to be less confident.  Then seeing him vote for himself I was like 'well I guess we should put you out of your misery'. 

Other than that I think your analysis is not bad, just misinformed.  I live in Japan so I'm on a drastically different time-zone, I've no experience with RVS as well.  I'm used to starting the game with night phase.  I don't like lynching based on random speculation.  I have around thirty mafia games under my belt but they've all been ones where we could communicate privately - this open playing field is very challenging and refreshing. 

And lastly, because I'm married, I'm often called away from the computer for whatever reason and I lose my train of thought and make some mistakes when I come back :/

You'll note that my behaviour with not-lynching Serela is the same as not wanting to lynch day 1 in the previous game. 

I'm not scum, I'm just not playing so great.  So good on you for making an analysis, but it'd be better invested in other players. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 04, 2013, 04:28:04 PM
Last point. I meant to say in my first analysis, only I forgot.

It's possible SB was killed to implicate DNA and Validon.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 04:32:50 PM
Option 3 - Appears to have good reads on who the scum are. 
SB implicated - DNA, Validon, Serela.  Serela is dead so let's rule him out. 

Option 4 - Will implicate another towny in some way
Not really relevant - we know scum killed SB, not vig, so any of the people who wanted him flipped - myself, Kilga, possibly PX - aren't responsible for killing him.  In short, if any of us were scum, we would almost certainly have gone for different targets.  Personally, I would have killed DNA as he's stated he has a role and is generally accepted to be town.  There's also been no interaction between Dark and myself to link back to me. 
Popping in to say I considered the "now watch me die night one" post as part of the motivation behind killing SB but I feel like that was factored into the motivation as a red herring for the town to focus on. Even though I obviously can't prove it, it's still a possibility.

Of course, Darkie's right when he says I'm being paranoid since I'm really stuck a little too firmly in the mindset of "anybody who is scum is either a master at mind games or taking advice from a teammate who's a master at mind games, do not fully trust anybody ever" and I really ought to just settle down and decide on at least SOME things to take at face value.

Also, I'd imagine DNA was one of the most obvious choices (if not the most obvious) for a doctor to visit last night, which the scum team probably thought of.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 04:49:09 PM
Paladin. Have you ever considered the possibility that since my towness is clear and validon being the next up big suspect plays a part in scum decision?

I have also had a fleeting vague idea of what you typed intially. You basically helped me to put that into words. And iam bad ad at wording stuff. So thanks.

Scum had no idea but would likely be expecting the doctor or jailkeep. Those are just the protective roles.

Considering i am a claimed PR with a "decent" power and kilga is the currently most townest player (assuming he is). Isnt that likely we are going to b eunder protection. And why would they want to risk losing an easy kill while masking their identity d1?

Simple. They murder someone else and let town mull over their reads to misdirect.
This smart-scum-who-think-three-steps-in is also what sent me on a complete reread of seemingly super town players. If thr scumteam has some really good player(ie kilga dormio px). Just any one of them in the scumteam leading the entire drama unfold as such would have been easy.

This is not overly speculative either. Ibam just giving those who apparantly live on another level a different view.

That said sky are you just an irritated scum who doesnt like how nobody town xonnected the dots to sb kill and decided to throw it out instead? That would also be a likely scenario to say.

Town. Try rereading the entire slew of this game an especially the seemingly supertown players. Their behavior do branch off at weird times and have a stream of oddly deep and fast insights on meta and nk and whatnot which they take the trouble to justify every time so as to not cause doubt. Sky paladins wall rigjt there is the epitome of this phenomena
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 04:50:45 PM
The fuck i got double cut by two diferent people.

Nvm dropping this.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 04:56:04 PM
Or not really dropping this if anything sky couldve just did a big scumslip in his hurry and threw a possibility up to us as an afterthought once reminded by kilga.

And do note how sky and kilga shares all major reads if you refer to their wall posts. Phone keep screwing up and i am in a hurry to send anything less they get voided
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 05:01:30 PM
Shadowy I know you would want to kill me. But let's pretend for a moment there's a doc in this game, since that's not an uncommon thing. Who do you think they would have protected last night?
How about the rolecop?

Ninja, did you cop SB last night or do you have a result to out?
Not really relevant - we know scum killed SB, not vig
Why do we know this?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 05:10:42 PM
Given tne player the rolecop role is attached to? No.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 05:24:48 PM
Why do we know this?
SB can still vote today and he wouldn't be able to do that if a townie killed him. A serial killer isn't out of the question but I'm going to act on the assumption that SB was the mafia kill. If a doctor saved somebody else last night then I'll reconsider (doc shouldn't necessarily out themselves for this purpose though, there's more work for them to do)

Ninja, did you cop SB last night or do you have a result to out?
I was wondering about Darkie's investigation too. Kind of figured he'd bring them up at his own discretion, but I guess it doesn't really hurt to ask.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 05:27:49 PM
This is the worst game for me to keep it short in isn't it >_>
It's really weird that with a claimed roleclop and a Kilgamayan the kill would be a lurkish but decent player, but it stands to reason to me that he was killed because he was DNA's claimed target in a get ahead of the cawp without killing the cop move. I would clear Kilga for this, but he's the only one I could consider capable of just killing SB in the first place. Polaris should have been a target really because his role is fakealmostmasons but I guess scum was banking on him not voting and/or not being cleared.
Serela (5): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc, Sky_Paladin, Cheez8
SB (1): PX,
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (1): Kilgamayan
Dormio (0): Serela
CF7 (1): Shadoweh
Pre lolwagon on me votecount. I'm willing to forgive Kilga for his cross-push on me and Serela that nearly got me outsted since he was successfully doing something. I'm even willing to forgive PX because I liked his earlier posts (he needs to post new targets now that SB is flipped town though.) I cannot appreciate CF7's lack of anything during deadline to the point of flaking. Neko hasn't posted yet, but I'm going to pre-emptively be upset with his slot until he does something good. Or dies. Preferrably dies.
Actually looking at the wagon it's pretty obvious why we're all Valimad. I'd say Sky P and Cheez are in the same position. If I were to throw darts that's where I'd try to hit the entire scumteam with them. Especially considering..
Serela (4): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc, PX
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7, SB
Shadoweh (3): Kilgamayan, Serela, Cheez8, Sky_Paladin
CF7 (1): Shadoweh
..How happy they were to dogpile onto me immediately after. I supose you'll just have to trust that I should be colored in pretty green here, but this is split town wagons.

The other possibility here is that Darkninja is a scum rolecop who killed his 'target' so he wouldn't have to out results. SB was pretty firmly on him the entire time too, so it's an easy scum move. Not sure if I'm feeling that one yet to be honest. At least I can read the game a little better without getting a giant headache.
Small clarification on the "factually incorrect" Shadowy case assessment thing: I did accuse her of floating along with barely a presence. I made this accusation exactly once, and it is the only aspect of my case that I didn't press. The useless CF7 vote and Making Stuff Up About SB were far worse an I've focused on them a lot more.
But the floating part was probably the most correct part of your case <_< I stand that my CF7 vote would have been a better lynch then Serela. I'm still mad at you for ignoring me.

Cut: ..That's a good catch. You're alright Cheez, you're alright.

##Vote: NekoNekoRex
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 05:42:56 PM
...Oh right, I completely forgot that Darkie mentioned investigating SB at some point. I guess that explains SB's death a little bit more.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 05:48:02 PM
I have been struggling on whether to bring my result up or not.

I didnt hit sb. So i did aim someone else whom i thought wont be the center of attention

And i am conflicted on what to do. I listened to kilgas advice and thought about what if i help isolate the townies. but since my resulted failed and i am atarting to see kilgascum whatever

I hit cheez8. As i have mentioned. It failed.

I have less clue than you as to what happened. Can someone explain?

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 05:51:18 PM
That said i will be sleeping in five mina or so. Seeya.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 05:58:30 PM
DNA: Sounds like you were roleblocked. This is exactly why claiming willy-nilly is not good for town, because scum most likely have tools to mess with your roles.

Shadowy that vote is really unfair. :| What do you hope to accomplish with it? To get NNR to explain a course of action he didn't take? And why did you do a bunch of wagon analysis before veering off to vote for someone completely unrelated to everything? Also it's super lame to CF7's lack of presence against him to the point of voting him when it's clear from his replacement that extenuating circumstances were the cause.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 06:08:35 PM
2 scum on, one scum off. That's wagon analysis related, you know. People doing nothing are more guilty then the ones actively doing things. It's also why I'd support a wagon on Validon over Sky/Cheez. What I expect to accomplish is to let Neko know he's got some work cut out for him. Also possibly to die?

Kilga if you're scum with Neko you'll totally be happier if you help me by bussing him right now >.>b
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 06:58:28 PM
Do you really think NNR is going to try harder because he has a vote on him for reasons he literally can't defend against?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 07:09:22 PM
DNA: Sounds like you were roleblocked. This is exactly why claiming willy-nilly is not good for town, because scum most likely have tools to mess with your roles.
So there's a scum roleblocker in this game, then?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 04, 2013, 07:12:55 PM
Yikes, SB died? I was actually thinking him scum a bit, but apparently not. And Serela turned out to be town too. As a lesson to Serela, if you want to not look like scum, please put more effort in. It was kind of hard for me not to vote for you, particularly once you started going "WAITING FOR SHADOWEH" over and over again.
Also, as for my absence at the end of D1, it was a combination of work and the fact that I didn't really have anything to add to the conversation. I mean, I looked over everything, but Serela still didn't seem towny to me at the time so I kept my vote in without a word because, well, what else could I say that everyone else didn't already say? By the time I DID get there, the arguments were already in place, and I had nothing to add.
As for the current situation, let's see... there are a few people that I haven't looked at too much, namely CF7/NNR, Sky_Paladin, Cheez, and Shadoweh. I'm going to give each of them an ISO and then make a decision based off of that, because everyone else I don't suspect too much but I might look at them again if nothing shows up with the first group of suspects Ill be looking at.

Current Opinions Before I Do ISOs:

As of now I'm still a little worried about Shadoweh's out-of-nowhere CF7 vote, but I think that might just be null because she often uses votes to try to pressure someone into talking whether she is certain of their scuminess or not.
Cheez I remember being a little flip-floppy at points, although my memory might just be hazy so I'll have to double-check that.
CF7 I only remember for not talking a whole lot, although since NNR replaced in perhaps there will be more from him.
Sky_Paladin I just remember was involved in the whole jokepost thing, which I originally read as null but I want to double check him.
Kilga is so town it wants to make me cry, although I'm curious as to why he wasn't nightkilled while SB was.
Dormio I've been reading as null but I should read him again when I have the time.
Dark's rolecop didn't work? Huh. Well, I still kind of am not exactly happy with his earlier thoughts though I suppose he hasn't been acting TOO suspicious recently.
Polaris I remember was involved with arguing with Serela yesterday, although I imagine if Serela was town Polaris might be town. I think. I originally thought that perhaps the two of them were maybe ITP if they weren't scum, but because Serela flipped town that does not seem to be the case.
PX is still null because lack of posts which I imagine is ending soon because he said the wedding was this weekend, and that would be over by now I would think.

Cut: @Cheez: Dark said he targeted you and it ended up failing, so it would be only logical that he got roleblocked unless he was lying about his role for whatever reason. I mean, I still have some doubts with him, but if Kilga trusts him, perhaps I should as well? Of course, I'm not going to go full Shadoweh and be all "I'LL VOTE FOR WHOEVER KILGA'S VOTING FOR UNLESS WE DISAGREE :V", but Kilga seems to know what he's doing and he's one of the towniest people here, so...
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 04, 2013, 07:57:25 PM
Friendly reminder, these counts will shoot up by 400 in 9 hours:

Quote from: some of the bars
NNR - 913
PX - 468
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 08:07:57 PM
Cheez: It seems quite possible.

Validon why is your List of People That Exist composed of nothing but town reads and null reads attached to excuses for why they are not scum reads? Surely you must think someone is scum at this point, you had all of Night 1 to give the game a once-or-twice-over. D1 wasn't even that long.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: SB on November 04, 2013, 08:35:08 PM
##Vote: PX
##Unvote

##Vote: Validon
##Unvote

##Vote: Shadoweh
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 09:39:39 PM
Well, okay then.
Remember when Darkie claimed his role? He said he was a rolecop whose action fails if anybody else targets his target. Last night, Darkie's action failed, and the main theory was that he had been roleblocked when we don't even know there's a roleblocker in this game in the first place.

Before learning about his action, I didn't even consider a roleblocker, even though I probably should've. But I wondered, why was that suggested? My first thought was that if that really was the case, maybe a mafia member would be confident in suggesting this, without paying attention to other possibilities. So I posed a question to Kilga for clarification, a trap if he really was scum... and then Validon kind of tumbled right in.

So, Validon, what's with this? You say the only logical options are Darkie lying and Darkie being roleblocked, even though it's clear that if Darkie's not lying there's at LEAST one other logical option. Please, explain why another player visiting me last night is not a possibility.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 04, 2013, 09:55:55 PM
I'll post my thoughts on each ISO as I finish each one in turn.

CF7: I read, and there's nothing I can really gleam from this little content. It would be better to wait until NNR says something, because he might have different thoughts than CF7 had. Until then, lack of any notable activity is currently enough to just vote him if nothing else comes up. Key word being "if." Still have reading to do.

Sky_Paladin: Reading through the beginning, does anyone else notice how his beginning posts were nonsense about different fruits and vegetables? A possible conditional role or ITP? I know sometimes people spout nonsense for fun at the beginning, but still, the fact that it goes on for multiple posts at the beginning bugs me.

Here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038175.html#msg1038175) are (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038177.html#msg1038177) examples (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038178.html#msg1038178) of this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038230.html#msg1038230).

As for his actual content, I don't like how here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038489.html#msg1038489) he says he doesn't want to vote PX "because he hosted the last game." That's great he hosted the last game, but to be honest that doesn't excuse you from voting him if you think him suspicious.

More nonsense. It's like we're talking to Shadoweh Jr. over here. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038570.html#msg1038570)

And the reason is reasoning I don't see any problems with. Right. Onto Shadoweh, then.

Cut:
Remember when Darkie claimed his role? He said he was a Roleclop whose action fails if anybody else targets his target.

Oh, I missed him saying that or just forgot. That does indeed mean that someone else could have visited you.
As for my response about there being a possibility of a roleblocker, I only said that because Kilga mentioned it. You're completely right, both possibilities are possible, I just forgot that detail about Dark's claim. v_v
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 04, 2013, 09:56:34 PM
And the rest is reasoning I don't see any problems with. Right. Onto Shadoweh, then.

My god typos.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 10:13:11 PM
Oh. And i am the Peachy Peach. The Roleclop. My ability fails if any other ability is used on the person i target
This was the entire post where he claimed. Seems pretty hard to miss that second part considering it's roughly half the post, and I have trouble believing you'd forget major details about one of the only roles that has been claimed so far.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 04, 2013, 10:18:29 PM
I figured if Dormio was OK to talk random gibberish about vegetables and stuff it would be okay for me, too.  I think back then we were all freaked out about the 400 word thing.  But then it turned out it was mostly for outing AFK people.  Ah well. 

Anyway, SB has sent us a message from beyond the grave who he thinks the scum team is.  I am inclined to agree on at least two counts. 

I have another hour before work to decide if I want to switch my vote. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 10:20:40 PM
Do you really think NNR is going to try harder because he has a vote on him for reasons he literally can't defend against?
I supose it depends on what you mean by try harder. I believe it will make it easier for me to get a read on him if he ever posts, yes.

SB u suk.

The tone of Validon's post impresses me from a genuinely sounding like it comes from a townie perspective. Cheez, he probably forgot about that part of Dark's roleclaim.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 04, 2013, 10:24:31 PM
Shadoweh:

[urlhttp://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038611.html#msg1038611]Maybe I'm just overreacting, but that last sentence.[/url] I know it's probably a joke but at this point I don't want to take anything lightly.

Okay... I can see someone wants someone to go Captain Planet. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038943.html#msg1038943) Which Polaris faked, considering that even when he did it nothing happened. Also Shadoweh acknowledging her own bad play is kind of worrying. It gives me that "Oh I'm playing bad I'm so sorry I promise to improve I'm totally not scum if that's what you're thinking" vibe. And that's not a good vibe to get.

[urlhttp://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039083.html#msg1039083]This post is bad for more than just the CF7 vote.[/url] I wouldn't exactly call what you typed before an "essay" on how you didn't like the wagon. You were basically like "he might be legit mad at someone, but then again he might not be." The post you mentioned was kind of leaning towards thinking Serela was town but it was waffling a bit, but the transition from "well I think he's town but he might not be" to "OMG GUYS THIS IS STUPID GET OFF HIS CASE" feels weird. I mean, Serela flipped town, yes. But the way Shadoweh acted around the whole thing is... weird. It doesn't fill me with happy thoughts at the moment.

Define "bussing." (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039999.html#msg1039999) Unless it's just another word for sheeping, but considering you claimed VT but said something like that, uh... yeah, not getting good vibes from that either.

For now, Shadoweh is still up there on my list of people I am willing to vote for. I need to do stuff with dinner and stuff before continuing my reads. Will be back with more later.

Cut: @Cheez: I read that, but somehow that really slipped my mind. I only remembered the roleclop part. <_>;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 04, 2013, 10:25:13 PM
Shadoweh:

Maybe I'm just overreacting, but that last sentence. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038611.html#msg1038611) I know it's probably a joke but at this point I don't want to take anything lightly.

Okay... I can see someone wants someone to go Captain Planet. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038943.html#msg1038943) Which Polaris faked, considering that even when he did it nothing happened. Also Shadoweh acknowledging her own bad play is kind of worrying. It gives me that "Oh I'm playing bad I'm so sorry I promise to improve I'm totally not scum if that's what you're thinking" vibe. And that's not a good vibe to get.

This post is bad for more than just the CF7 vote. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039083.html#msg1039083) I wouldn't exactly call what you typed before an "essay" on how you didn't like the wagon. You were basically like "he might be legit mad at someone, but then again he might not be." The post you mentioned was kind of leaning towards thinking Serela was town but it was waffling a bit, but the transition from "well I think he's town but he might not be" to "OMG GUYS THIS IS STUPID GET OFF HIS CASE" feels weird. I mean, Serela flipped town, yes. But the way Shadoweh acted around the whole thing is... weird. It doesn't fill me with happy thoughts at the moment.

Define "bussing." (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039999.html#msg1039999) Unless it's just another word for sheeping, but considering you claimed VT but said something like that, uh... yeah, not getting good vibes from that either.

For now, Shadoweh is still up there on my list of people I am willing to vote for. I need to do stuff with dinner and stuff before continuing my reads. Will be back with more later.

Cut: @Cheez: I read that, but somehow that really slipped my mind. I only remembered the roleclop part. <_>;

TYPOS MY GOD
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 04, 2013, 10:28:21 PM
Kill a middle of the road suspect who is ALSO a PR? Who the fuck is imitating my scum play >:(

Seriousness though, I'm laughing at SB's votes. There's two townies in there, so stop being so mad.

 Also, my opinion is that scum have a roleblocker in the game. It's not THAT uncommon, especially with what we have so far.

As for who can be left as scum, current nk analysis leads me to believe that Validon is the scums, so

Vote Validon

I'm sure people said this before, but I don't like him leaving all options open at the end of D1 without looking committed to any of them, and the fact that he completely disappeared at the end of D1 which I view as a legit scum tactic.

As for who else.... I'm kind of worried about Kilga since he isn't dead, and the NK is also making me a little doubtful of DNA

cuts oh god my hands are cold reading
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 04, 2013, 10:42:05 PM
Cut: @Cheez: I read that, but somehow that really slipped my mind. I only remembered the roleclop part. <_>;
Mrrrrh. That's really lame but it's still possible (somehow.) I guess I'll drop this particular case against Validon and let him try to deal with looking suspicious in other ways.

(Kinda worries me that most of the people happiest to vote Validon are some of my scumteam hunches from Day 1 but I'll wait and see how things go.)

Also, my opinion is that scum have a roleblocker in the game. It's not THAT uncommon, especially with what we have so far.
My argument was not that there wasn't a roleblocker in the game. My argument was that immediately assuming that's what happened despite knowing of Darkie's role's weakness is scummy. In fact, I'm pretty sure that IS what happened considering I'm also pretty sure I didn't get targeted last night (or at least didn't notice it) BUT the only people who would actually be aware that Darkie's role's weakness didn't come into play are me and the people who knew he was roleblocked.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 10:44:54 PM
Validon: Bussing is when scum vote for other scum in order to look super townie awesome.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 10:55:10 PM
I believe it will make it easier for me to get a read on him if he ever posts, yes.

How? Why should NNR give a damn that you're voting for him?

PX, why is Shadowy town, and why are you antagonizing the Chicago Voter? <_<
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Raikaria on November 04, 2013, 10:59:52 PM
Votecount 2.35

Validon98 (3): Kilgamayan, Polaris, PX
Shadoweh (2): Sky_Paladin, SB
Kilgamayan (1): Darkninjaabc
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
NekoNekoRex (1): Shadoweh

Not Voting (3): NekoNekoRex, Cheez8, Validon98

It's 6 to lynch
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 11:08:51 PM
Although I appreciate you wanting to know my motives, the only person I want to answer them for is Neko.
Shadoweh is town by being townie ^_^/ Also funny because I thought the same thing Re: PX's killstyle.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 11:11:06 PM
NNR has no reason to care that I'm voting for him but I can't admit that I'm voteparking because it'll expose me as scum further so I'm going to play coy instead

oh
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 11:13:18 PM
Also:

Not really relevant - we know scum killed SB, not vig

Why do we know this?

SB can still vote today and he wouldn't be able to do that if a townie killed him. A serial killer isn't out of the question but I'm going to act on the assumption that SB was the mafia kill.

Cut: ..That's a good catch. You're alright Cheez, you're alright.

How was this even a thing? It got discussed at the beginning of the day while you were around, you shouldn't have needed the clarification later. Are you just plain not paying attention to the thread (a possibility that might explain Making Stuff Up About SB)?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 04, 2013, 11:15:35 PM
##Unvote, ##Vote: Shadoweh

You're probably a greater loss to the scum team than Validon. I wish I had two votes.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 04, 2013, 11:18:26 PM
Just seeing kilga and px on vagon is making me turn my head.

But i cant see it. My logic isnt the best as how the game and you guys revealed. What i can least do is sheep. I will do the sheeping then if hes the only choice by day end.

Vali is anything but mediocre. His reads are confusing but far away from crap or godly. He never defended himself either. Hopefully he actually will now that given hes the biggest wagon with an impressive amount of people on so soon day start.

And theres that kilga is pushing validon. I just need more time to read anytging siurced kilga.

Seeya school
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 04, 2013, 11:49:38 PM
Hi ho, hi ho, off to work we go. 

Well I'm happy with my vote on Shadoweh and seeing Kilg switch to it fills me with dark glee reassurance.  I can only presume Shadoweh will now flip town and ruin my good day. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 04, 2013, 11:58:52 PM
MAKE A POST ABOUT SOON. PROBABLY.
Apparently "soon" translates to "whenever I'm done falling asleep and waking up a couple of times".

Anyway. I should address a few things first.
Dormio, I think you're making too much of Sky Paladin's Serela vote. Most of the newbies in this game have been hyper-paranoid about wagons and consolidation and whatnot, and once Sky Paladin saw he had more time than he thought he had he went back to voting someone he thought was scum. I don't think too harshly of him for it.
I dunno. Sky Palladium demonstrated competence and a willingness to abuse newbmeta last game.

Also.
I live in Japan so I'm on a drastically different time-zone
I live in Australia. Welcome to the club of shitty timezones.

Anyway, on to Validon98.
I dunno there's not terribly much for me to say when everyone else covers him first.
Can I just recycle my opinion on him from yesterday and say that I would sheep the various cases on him?

Moving on, Cheez8.
It's just like, I read through his D1 and he's got no opinions basically.
I mean the closest thing to scumreads are here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039250.html#msg1039250) but he gives basically no reasoning for any of his reads.
I mean I guess technically he has reasoning for his Kilga vote here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039319.html#msg1039319) which is mostly about how Kilga was attacking Validon but then if we look at Cheez8's posts today...
Like, this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039854.html#msg1039854) for example, suddenly Kilga voting for Validon becomes something that Cheez8 is agreeing with.
I dunno, Cheez8's behaviours basically look to me like they're not really following a set thought process and that he's basically just trying to go with popular opinion to stay on the sidelines while having some (poorly thought out) unique reads to make it look like he's contributing.
Or something like that.

Warning - while you were reading 17 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
I surrender. My brain isn't working at all.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 04, 2013, 11:59:04 PM
Also:
How was this even a thing? It got discussed at the beginning of the day while you were around, you shouldn't have needed the clarification later. Are you just plain not paying attention to the thread (a possibility that might explain Making Stuff Up About SB)?
I don't remember it getting talked about besides that SB was alive. Actually it hadn't occured to me that he could not come back.
No that's not the reason you giant dork. Sorry that you're more interested in letting literally The Worst Slot (tm) live. I can't imagine who I could be scum with since everyone hates me (I guess everyone since my scumteam always hates me dohohoho)

Sky: I find it more likely that I won't flip at all, because that would be terrible. Sorry.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 12:26:53 AM
I am annoyed with Validon because apparently he thought it would be a good idea to start ISOs off with CF7 of all people, and we all know that CF7 is unremarkable so I dunno what Validon was trying to accomplish there. Regardless, anyone can just ISO a person and make comments about various things that are suspicious and look like they're contributing. Validon, your top priority should be to say "[INSERT NAME HERE] is the scum" and place a vote down on that person.

Shadoweh pseudo-defending Validon is notable, and could imply Shadoweh-Validon scumteam but that's for later. Leaving my vote on Validon.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 12:29:43 AM
I am ok with lynching Shadoweh though. It's just that Validon > Shadoweh in my head.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 12:32:17 AM
Or maybe it's because Shadoweh is just so Bad? that I'm not even dignifying her by prioritizing her scumminess. ?_?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 05, 2013, 01:14:53 AM
I am annoyed with Validon because apparently he thought it would be a good idea to start ISOs off with CF7 of all people, and we all know that CF7 is unremarkable so I dunno what Validon was trying to accomplish there.

Well I'm sorry, I just wanted to double-check and make sure there wasn't something he said that seemed scummy. >_>;

Quote
Validon, your top priority should be to say "[INSERT NAME HERE] is the scum" and place a vote down on that person.

Okay, listen. I've been looking at everyone's posts and seeing whether or not they could be scummy. I'm doing the fucking best I can, and I'm not going to go "[INSERT NAME HERE] is the scum" when I have my fucking doubts. I have been getting a LOT of nullreads this game, and frankly it's really annoying when people are jumping on me for not being able to find a solid case. The only cases I had were against Serela and SB, but they both ended up town, so what when do I do? I ISO people who are leaning scum.

I don't think anyone realizes this yet: D1 sucks for me. I am NOT someone who just jumps on little tiny details and expect it to reveal scum. No, I look at what's there and try my best to suss out a case from what's there, but I know I will more often than not fail to do so.  I have had a VERY difficult time sussing out any cases this time around, and the ones I DID suss out ended up being wrong in both cases. It also doesn't help that I've been dragged away from the game by school and other IRL shit. So pardon me if my play is subpar. I can only do so much and be here for so long before my head starts hurting and I need to do other things.

I'm tired of looking through posts that don't seem scummy to me. I'm just going to vote for who I currently think is the scummiest, because CLEARLY if I don't then I'M the scum.

##Vote: Shadoweh

I know NNR hasn't posted yet, but goddamnit that's no reason to vote him. The initial CF7 vote already left a sour taste in my throat. Continuously pushing him right now is folly and you should actually take a look at other people that you find scummy.

If you have any questions for me, I'll answer them in a while when I'm better able to collect my thoughts, because right now I'm a little tired of reading things right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 02:16:15 AM
This is just general mafia advice, but you should start expecting people to jump on you if you know your play is bad. Try not to take things personally and snark at people who are just playing the game.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 05, 2013, 02:28:00 AM
I was scumbuddies with Serela for defending him too. I'm glad my habit of reading people and finding good traits in them helps you all ship me with so many people.

Valdion, that's quite obviously not why I'm voting Neko. That is possibly the worst vote I've seen all day. Are you seriously mad at me for voting a lurking scumbag slot that keeps getting replaced out? Telling me pushing at someone is 'folly' is hilarious because it's not scummy to do stupid stubborn things, so why are you voting me besides that you've decided it's Not You?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 05, 2013, 02:44:13 AM
Hell, you haven't voted for really anyone else recently. I am perfectly aware that CF7/NNR's slot has done like nothing at all recently. If that's the case, instead of wasting your vote on someone supposedly "unremarkable," use it on someone you can actually argue against. Besides, if he doesn't talk, he'll probably get modkilled anyways, and if he is scum then he'll be revealed for the scum that he is. It's a waste of your time to do that, but yet you still insist on doing it anyways. For what reason? Are you just trying to get an easy target? What about your other reads? You apparently have one on me and Kilga. Why not actually vote for one of your reads instead of leaving your vote on someone who can't even argue back at the moment?

@Polaris: I am not taking anyone jumping on me personally. I'm more frustrated at myself for not sticking around enough when I have the time to actually do this. I got a little carried away with that post, though. I'm just going to say I'm going to try to stick around more D2, because not being here more and participating more is what has caused everyone to jump on me, and it's that same thing that angers me about Shadoweh's vote on NNR.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 05, 2013, 03:03:26 AM
I disbelieve he'll actually get modkilled until it happens. People tend to show up at the last moment to save themselves.
I'm perfectly capable of yelling at people without voting for them still. Like you. Not swinging my vote around like an idiot is again, a thing I'm not doing but it's not a scummy thing. Didn't you think CF7 was scummy? Do you think I'm attacking a townie that can't fight back, or am I correct in assuming from your tone that you don't care about CF7 so much as that it makes a good reason to vote me because I'm 'attacking a lurker' or whatever? I'm not trying to convince you of anything with my vote, you're not the one I want to read with it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 03:11:18 AM
I was scumbuddies with Serela for defending him too. I'm glad my habit of reading people and finding good traits in them helps you all ship me with so many people.

don't be a weenie, you know i'm talking about association reads >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 03:16:39 AM
C'mon, Shadowy. If you're gonna go down like this the least you could do is try to push your "case" by linking the Downfall video so we can all get a few chuckles out of the whole thing.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 05, 2013, 03:22:40 AM
That doesn't mean anything. The only thing I could see as scummy in CF7 from memory was his "I'll reread everything" post... which was his last post. Other than that, though, I still don't see how he was exactly scummy. Not posting, sure. People sometimes do that. Hell, PX hasn't been able to post in a while, but that has been excused due to IRL stuff. Who knows what's been going on with CF7? I still don't find it exactly great that you continue to push on someone who might not be able to post. You call my vote bad, but you're still holding onto a bad vote yourself. Hypocritical, no?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 05, 2013, 03:39:45 AM
Hey, remember when NNR was supposed to post? :V
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 03:47:14 AM
I'm pretty tempted to switch to Shadoweh right now but that would be L-1 with over 48 hours left in the day and that would be hilariously silly. At least Validon started putting effort in after being called out for it, which counts for something.

Trying to consider some not Shadoweh people that could be scum, but the entire glob of Sky Palladium, Darkninja, Cheez is a big bleh. If I had to pick one person out of the three it'd probably be Sky Palladium. I should probably also consider Dormio as an option.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 05, 2013, 04:05:00 AM
Moving on, Cheez8.
It's just like, I read through his D1 and he's got no opinions basically.
I mean the closest thing to scumreads are here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039250.html#msg1039250) but he gives basically no reasoning for any of his reads.
I'm pretty sure I gave somewhat valid reasons for a couple of my votes and reads yesterday, and stuck with them.

I mean I guess technically he has reasoning for his Kilga vote here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039319.html#msg1039319) which is mostly about how Kilga was attacking Validon but then if we look at Cheez8's posts today...
Like, this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039854.html#msg1039854) for example, suddenly Kilga voting for Validon becomes something that Cheez8 is agreeing with.
I noticed this too, and it bothered me.
(Kinda worries me that most of the people happiest to vote Validon are some of my scumteam hunches from Day 1 but I'll wait and see how things go.)
You'll notice that I did wait and see how things go, and decided against voting for Validon.

I dunno, Cheez8's behaviours basically look to me like they're not really following a set thought process and that he's basically just trying to go with popular opinion to stay on the sidelines while having some (poorly thought out) unique reads to make it look like he's contributing.
Or something like that.

You're at least half right. I'm not following a set thought process at all, other than thinking about possibilities and figuring out which ones I think I can safely discount as impossible. As for popular opinion... maybe. I'm probably swayed by others' opinions more than I'd like to believe. Whatever "unique reads" you're talking about are probably my attempts to counter that without even noticing it (and I don't know if I'd call them poorly thought out all the time. Okay maybe I would but I wouldn't call them inaccurate.) That last part though... Nope. I've done nothing to "look like I'm contributing." In fact, I've barely had two posts so far where I concerned myself at all with how I come across. Nearly all of my posts in this game have been created with the sole intent of adding to the town's collective information. Pointing out a flaw, suggesting a possibility, mentioning a hunch... I've been doing whatever felt useful, without worrying about whether it'll make me look like a townie. In fact I'm pretty sure this is the first post I've made in this game that actually specifically addresses my standing in that regard.

Wow, I thought there would be fewer words there.
Anyway.

Validon's #550 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040193.html#msg1040193) here sounds trustworthy. It makes me happy.

...Are you serious, is Shadoweh actually at L-2 right now?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 05, 2013, 04:12:25 AM
Nearly all of my posts in this game have been created with the sole intent of adding to the town's collective information.
That and voting.  :V
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 05, 2013, 04:29:04 AM
Votecount 2.4

Shadoweh (4): Sky_Paladin, SB, Kilgamayan, Validon98
Validon98 (2): Polaris, PX
Kilgamayan (1): Darkninjaabc
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
NekoNekoRex (1): Shadoweh

Not Voting (2): NekoNekoRex, Cheez8

It's 6 to lynch and 48.5 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)

Quote from: bars
NNR - 1313
PX - 700
Everyone else - 400

This dragon doesn't actually like modkills, you know. Grace period for, like, some 12 hours, seriously.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 04:47:18 AM
Did I inherit a wordcount penalty or something or has it really been that long?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 05, 2013, 04:49:02 AM
Both. Best get to posting.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 05, 2013, 04:54:59 AM
Quote
19) Taking note of the rule before this one, replacements should be ready to jump in immediately if/when they're needed.

Though I guess I should have made it clear that the point is each slot has a bar.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 05:23:44 AM
PX - 700

PX you might want to get around to fixing this, just because you're not getting lynched today doesn't mean you're super duper townie. <_<
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 05, 2013, 05:28:29 AM
Just dropping in to comment on the current situation.

Shadoweh has been suspicious since d1. And honestly I do not really know what to think of him now.
If he's anywhere near scum he should be panicking and countering all the minor details when so close to hammer. We all understand getting lynched d2 isn't exactly the best idea. How absolutely laidback and carefree his attitude is mind boggling.
I am not ready to wagon him. I want to hear his thoughts and hopefully convince us he isnt scum. Last game was basically lost due to the uncaring of us players. And if you actually dont care enough, stop it, we need you.

That said again, if we do run out of time again I shall gladly take the hammer to you for being a dick, nothing personal really. But ruining everyone's game deserve a fitting virtual death.

Basically validon's walls are pretty convincing to me, as I basically think the exact same thing at my cases falling apart.  Bleh.
Kilga is sending me in a train of mad speculation. Is he like actually town with small slips appearing everywhere but refused to address them? Or is he a town just not directly addressing a newb's voice because he knows that said newb cannot sway the game much? No. Those responses from him and his followup enthusiasm in bouncing around poking at so-called ''scummy players'' without much analysis is enough to convince me he's scum.

This is also why I am unwilling to wagon shadow now. Sure there could be that kilga and him are playing a doublebus and its no doubt they both have the brains to do so. Yet more is the fact that the day is far from end. If we don't further push the wagon scum will have a considerably harder time wifom themselves out of it if they quickhammer now.

In a nutshell, speak up shadoweh. And kilga too.

PX can wait. He's either getting replaced or will explain hard. Either way its not solid scumread that prioritizes shadoweh lynch(whom I will lynch reluctantly if no better options are provided). And both my hands are up for kilga wagon anytime.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 05, 2013, 05:31:20 AM
And then there's cheez8.

I have to leave now so I can't wall my doubts. But he's null either way and won't interfere with my votes on where I believe are people who richly deserve it,.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 05:33:19 AM
Or is he a town just not directly addressing a newb's voice because he knows that said newb cannot sway the game much?

I responded to everything I saw that you addressed directly at me. If I missed something, feel free to point it out and I'll get to it when I can (though I'm about to go to bed). Shadowy has all but claimed scum at this point so we have some free time.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 05:48:02 AM
Told ya man, I suck at subbing when I do, but putting his burden on my back isn't going to make me any better at it. Especially when you expect me to post like a page and a half of text just to appease something I didn't even do. What a load.

Shit, what's going on here? Sounds like the SB kill wasn't expected, and analyzing the nightkill is worthless anyway.

I guess I'll go through some basic motions here.

Quote
Maybe it went on somebody bulletproof or they were afk (*cough* CF7). 
Right, I'm sure all three scumbuddies forgot to act or send partners to do actions.

Wow, this whole post is bad. The big text wall in the middle is a bunch of fluff and lynch remorse. He suspects me for... being inactive, I guess, and he has reasons to vote Shadoweh that are ????  (if it was explained in D1, fuck that, I'm not gonna read it)
Followed by "blah blah blah rolespec, #vote Shaodweh"

Does Sky have any other posts today? Let's see...

Quote
I'm interested in why SB was killed.
Yep, he does. He spends a bunch of time on SB, to the point of making me want to skim his posts. Even if SB was a vig shot, it doesn't tell pretty much anything about anyone's alignment. Scum SOMETIMES NK based on who doesn't like them, but that's usually lame.

Followed by a silly DNA post. PROTIP: I think I'm just going to ignore DNA, his posts give me a headache and hard to get literally anything from. If anything I'd want to policy kill him for being hilariously paranoid.

More Serela remorse... Sky Paladin, are you going to spend any time actually scumhunting?

##Vote: Sky Paladin

Placeholder until I have everyone read

CUT BY my internet going kaput for an hour.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 05, 2013, 10:29:03 AM
And I'm back.  Let's get this done, then. 

Quote
Shit, what's going on here? Sounds like the SB kill wasn't expected, and analyzing the nightkill is worthless anyway.
Quote
 

It's always worth considering, even if it ends up with nothing.  Not considering something means that an important detail that may have existed is guaranteed to be missed.  We don't know until we look. 

Quote
Right, I'm sure all three scumbuddies forgot to act or send partners to do actions.

I will assume that there is one scumbuddy that can hit, one scumbuddy that can sabotage, and one scumbuddy that can do (some other thing/is bulletproof) when one of their buddies die.  Therefore, that's one hit last night.  There's the possibility that scums can send in actions for their afk buddies. 

I'm going to quote you out of order for context cohesion. 

Quote
Even if SB was a vig shot, it doesn't tell pretty much anything about anyone's alignment. Scum SOMETIMES NK based on who doesn't like them, but that's usually lame.

Actually last night, it matters a lot.  If SB was vighit, it means mafia was afk last night.  There was a very small pool of afk players, one of which was CF7, a fact you know very well.  If we could pin the lack-of-hit on CF7's afk, the you'd be subbing in to face the lynch today.  This was discussed in depth on the previous pages.  I want to say "probably you didn't notice it" but apparently you read my posts in depth; therefore, it's a detail you couldn't have missed.  I will assume it was deliberately ignored to make your case. 

Quote
More Serela remorse... Sky Paladin, are you going to spend any time actually scumhunting?

I don't have remorse over Serela.  If Shadoweh flips town, I'll be sorry.  But Serela didn't do anything to help his situation and continued to play scummy, right up to attempted suicide.  I argued several times that Serela wasn't a viable target and was ignored.  Therefore, I would look at the others who voted to lynch with more suspicion than you did with me. 

Your post is essentially "I am arbitrarily targetting Sky_Paladin for a number of flawed reasons", including some points that you chose to ignore because they didn't fit your story.  I can ignore bad play and I can ignore mistakes.  However, you deliberately picked me out for some specific reason and made bad arguments to support it. 

Therefore, I'm forced to conclude you're scum trying to buy heat off of Shadoweh. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 05, 2013, 10:29:25 AM
....................

I'm so sorry.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 05, 2013, 10:33:16 AM
I can't edit the post, naturally. 

And I'm back.  Let's get this done, then.

Quote
Shit, what's going on here? Sounds like the SB kill wasn't expected, and analyzing the nightkill is worthless anyway.

It's always worth considering, even if it ends up with nothing.  Not considering something means that an important detail that may have existed is guaranteed to be missed.  We don't know until we look.

Quote
Right, I'm sure all three scumbuddies forgot to act or send partners to do actions.

I will assume that there is one scumbuddy that can hit, one scumbuddy that can sabotage, and one scumbuddy that can do (some other thing/is bulletproof) when one of their buddies die.  Therefore, that's one hit last night.  There's the possibility that scums can send in actions for their afk buddies.

I'm going to quote you out of order for context cohesion.

Quote
Even if SB was a vig shot, it doesn't tell pretty much anything about anyone's alignment. Scum SOMETIMES NK based on who doesn't like them, but that's usually lame.

Actually last night, it matters a lot.  If SB was vighit, it means mafia was afk last night.  There was a very small pool of afk players, one of which was CF7, a fact you know very well.  If we could pin the lack-of-hit on CF7's afk, the you'd be subbing in to face the lynch today.  This was discussed in depth on the previous pages.  I want to say "probably you didn't notice it" but apparently you read my posts in depth; therefore, it's a detail you couldn't have missed.  I will assume it was deliberately ignored to make your case.

Quote
More Serela remorse... Sky Paladin, are you going to spend any time actually scumhunting?

I don't have remorse over Serela.  If Shadoweh flips town, I'll be sorry.  But Serela didn't do anything to help his situation and continued to play scummy, right up to attempted suicide.  I argued several times that Serela wasn't a viable target and was ignored.  Therefore, I would look at the others who voted to lynch with more suspicion than you did with me.

Your post is essentially "I am arbitrarily targetting Sky_Paladin for a number of flawed reasons", including some points that you chose to ignore because they didn't fit your story.  I can ignore bad play and I can ignore mistakes.  However, you deliberately picked me out for some specific reason and made bad arguments to support it.

Therefore, I'm forced to conclude you're scum trying to buy heat off of Shadoweh. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 05, 2013, 10:46:31 AM
I responded to everything I saw that you addressed directly at me. If I missed something, feel free to point it out and I'll get to it when I can (though I'm about to go to bed). Shadowy has all but claimed scum at this point so we have some free time.
No, I'm pretty sure I claimed Vanilla Town. I really like my role flavor so I'm sad I can't talk about it. Nom nom everything! I'm seriously suspicious of you for thinking this is my scum game. You really haven't noticed that no one cares about this wagon or is trying hard to start a different one? It's because I'm town and lynching me for being.. not even weird at this point, just continuing the stupid Day 1 Shadoweh Is Scumpartners With Everyone case is super special easy.

Sky did you just accuse Neko, the slot I've been suggesting we lynch every day, of being my scum partner? <_< God damn you people need to stop throwing out the baby with the bathwater and stop making associative reads before someone's flipped, get a scum and figure out who they're linked to, stop fitting all the squares into your round holes.

Neko I'm here to help you read 1300 words <^_^> If you're not going to read Day 1, the gist is SB was his usual self, DNA outted himself as a roleclop, and Serela was Town Best Pal with Polaris who we lynched because he was Serela. Taking a look at the player list you wouldn't expect SB to die either, would you?



Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 11:58:27 AM
lynching me for being.. not even weird at this point, just continuing the stupid Day 1 Shadoweh Is Scumpartners With Everyone case is super special easy.

Not my case at all and you know it! But go ahead and keep trying to bully your way out of your own lynch, I'm sure it'll work eventually. Maybe. Well okay no it won't but!

You know what you remind me of? A certain wise statement from one Eyes of 13 Sages, way back in the day:

Quote
Endymion, that was a mean trick, telling me how dare I believe Joker's case on you, without ever telling me what exactly was wrong with it. Guilt instead of an actual defense, I understand what scummy AtE feels like now.

Hey, guess who this applies to now!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 12:10:11 PM
Also I like how you accuse me/the entirety of your wagon of hanging onto the easiest case ever when your vote has spent more than half of the game on the CF7/NNR player slot for not being here. That's adorable, please continue. <3
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 05, 2013, 12:15:38 PM
:V Considering it's garnered me a huge wagon I don't think you can call it easy.
Also Eyes was a batty idiot who everyone thought was scum, you shouldn't listen to anything they said  :derp:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 05, 2013, 12:44:39 PM
Tried to stay up to continue responding to this . Fell asleep instead. :V

NNR is here, and already he and Sky_Paladin are in conflict. I'm not entirely happy with NNR's initial play, but he just got here and starting reading, so I'm going to give him a little more time. I'm not particularly okay with Sky_Paladin implying NNR is her scumpartner. I mean, it might be a possibility that Shadoweh is just bussing NNR, but I'm willing to give him a bit of the benefit of the doubt as long as he continues his reads and doesn't drop out out of nowhere.

Classes now. Won't be back for a while.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 05, 2013, 01:45:33 PM
Quote
I'm not particularly okay with Sky_Paladin implying NNR is her scumpartner.

I did no such thing :D 

I STATED that I believed NNR was a scumbuddy. 

So my question for you, Validon, is this: 

Why are you not particularly okay about it? 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 05, 2013, 02:36:39 PM
My question is but a simple one.

Why is shadoweh even scum
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 02:54:13 PM
There are at least three main reasons.

- Her votes for the CF7/NNR player slot have been weak and useless. To understand exactly why what she is doing is scummy, consider this: townies make cases and cast votes to get scum lynched, while scum make cases and cast votes to look town. Scum do not have nearly as much of a vested interest in the effects their vote has on the person they are voting; they are simply trying to avoid getting lynched by looking like townies. Shadowy's vote right now was cast with the idea that it would somehow encourage NNR to try harder, and when it was pointed out that this was a giant load, she started playing coy and refused to explain herself.

- Shadowy blatantly Made Stuff Up About SB on Day 1 in her attempts to look like she was suspecting him. She got called on this falsehood, tried to justify it, and when her justification was exposed as also wrong, she just kind of ignored the whole thing in the hopes that not calling attention to it would make it go away.

- Shadowy has spent a lot of time today using bullying tactics and appeals to emotion to dissuade the votes for her, instead of logically explaining why the case against her is bunk.

I could write this up better and include links if I were at home, but I'm unfortunately not, so this quick summary will have to do.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 03:02:58 PM
I will assume that there is one scumbuddy that can hit, one scumbuddy that can sabotage, and one scumbuddy that can do (some other thing/is bulletproof) when one of their buddies die.  Therefore, that's one hit last night.  There's the possibility that scums can send in actions for their afk buddies.

I'm going to quote you out of order for context cohesion.

Actually last night, it matters a lot.  If SB was vighit, it means mafia was afk last night. 
Mafia don't "afk". That simply never happens. Scum can tell the mod to "send Buddy to do ##Action" if they have to, and kills are almost always decided long before the night is over.

Quote
I don't have remorse over Serela.  If Shadoweh flips town, I'll be sorry.  But Serela didn't do anything to help his situation and continued to play scummy, right up to attempted suicide.  I argued several times that Serela wasn't a viable target and was ignored.  Therefore, I would look at the others who voted to lynch with more suspicion than you did with me.
Your posts all really read "WOW I FEEL SO BAD FOR LYNCHING SERELA" which is a scumtell.

Quote
Your post is essentially "I am arbitrarily targetting Sky_Paladin for a number of flawed reasons", including some points that you chose to ignore because they didn't fit your story.  I can ignore bad play and I can ignore mistakes.  However, you deliberately picked me out for some specific reason and made bad arguments to support it.

Therefore, I'm forced to conclude you're scum trying to buy heat off of Shadoweh.
Where are these reasons even for voting him? I need to go back and reread your D2 posts because I didn't see them.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 03:09:19 PM
Quote
Neko I'm here to help you read 1300 words <^_^> If you're not going to read Day 1, the gist is SB was his usual self, DNA outted himself as a roleclop, and Serela was Town Best Pal with Polaris who we lynched because he was Serela. Taking a look at the player list you wouldn't expect SB to die either, would you?
Thanks Shadoweh, this is the best post I've actually yet bothered to read this game (the others only being Sky Paladin so far)

Onwards with reading random people at arbitrary times then being busy and avoiding sleep (which will bite me in the ass later)

I'll probably have a Kilga read and a couple other people if I can manage not falling asleep on the bus by the time I can post again
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 03:10:49 PM
also I reread SP's posts and still haven't seen a conclusive reason why Shadoweh is scum.

Not to imply I've actually read Shadoweh and made my own decisions, which SP also seems to have assumed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 03:13:07 PM
*D2 posts

Quote
If Shadoweh flips town, I'll be sorry.
Here's a cool tip to look town and be cool:

If you see a guy who looks scummy, push that fucker hard. Vote him and then pressure him till he dies.

If he flips scum? Good job.
If he flips town? Who gives a shit? He's already dead, and probably deserved it too. Find another scum jerk and push that fucker hard.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 04:17:36 PM
Cool so lets look at some more peeps

Validon: I'm totes going to ignore him today, Serela flipped him as a Neighbor or something... heh, and they have shared votes.
Yeah, I'm just going to file him under "town" for now, I'm lazy. Also I was at one point destined to get that role, and I never role scum, so that just seals the deal.

Darkninjaabc: lol who cares

Cheez8
Quote
...Are you implying that CF7 counted for the entirety of the scum team?
FINALLY someone who understands who moronic that line of thinking is!
Cheez8 for townie mayor B)

In all seriousness Cheez needs a vote, he's been sitting on it far too long for him not have at least a vauge idea of who he thinks is scummy, and "somebody" is always better then "nada jack shit". His posts are mostly just setup spec too, which is terribad.

Kilga:
Reading Kilga now. I have pretty bad gut on him, but that's mostly because he keeps bringing up player meta, which, while still a thing, still bothers me endlessly when it's talked about.
At least he gives me a good idea what's going on with this next case... (hint: it's Shadoweh)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 04:24:18 PM
Believe me, I don't like me having talked about player meta any more than you do. I would at least point out that I only talked about it in response to/relative to Shadowy, since she is the Player Meta Queen.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 05, 2013, 04:24:52 PM
I want to wall but i honestly dont know what to add.
The entire exchange with kilga is enough to convince me that hes town.

NNR used 'policy kill' instead of 'policy lyncch. Scumslip much?

I finally am able to see where scumshadow is coming from. I just dont agree with how by not replying means scum. Generally no opinion=consent with stance else it would be taxing to go "oh i so agree with your definition of catgirls" everytime a conflicting item comes up. So imo that merely calls to me that shadoweh is lazier rather.

Which is why i refused to wagon too. I guess that doubt i mentioned still isnt clarified, but i did check and weird stance is there but downplayed.

I am really pissed with myself. I just cant seem to put my ideas into convincing words without referencing or guided by someone elses conclusion. This is so irritating in mafia especially.

That said.

##Vote shadoweh

If he flips town i will be so mad at trusting kilga

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 04:27:50 PM
##Unvote: Shadoweh

I would have basically no problem if Shadowy self-hammered but I at least don't want it to xcut off NNR's content.

DNA: Before you freak out at my unvote, I still believe in the case and will be moving the vote back once NNR is done posting stuff.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 04:29:19 PM
Also SB should probably express his opinion of the scum team one more time before the lynch.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 05, 2013, 04:35:13 PM
##Unvote

No i will not flip out for i wasnt in the right state of mind and forgot about how votes are standing currently after reading 20 pages of words on a tiny phone
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 04:37:02 PM
Shadoweh
Quote
NNR is going to try harder because he has a vote on him?
HAHAHA NOPE
But I'm actually playing anyway because that's what I do when I join Mafia. Usually.

Quote
Am here expect dogpile
Kinda sums up the case on her. I kinda wonder why she's this scuicidal. She's not scumhunting anyone reasonable. Her best case is on me because CF7 was a lurker, which by itself is usually a laugnable case on its own, especially when the "lurker" is someone who replaced out anyway. If your best case for keeping yourself from death is to vote for the guy who cannot actually be read, then you are trying surprisingly not hard.

Hey Shadoweh, I'm posting now. Got anyone else you think is scum? :smug:
##Unvote
##Vote: [REDACTED to avoid hammer] (Hint it's Shadoweh)


----
In light of this...

I'd like to reiterate that my case on Paladin is entirely based on the fact I didn't read anything else before I looked at him, and I think his posts are pretty trash, and his lynch remorse is for having nothing better to actually talk about. Try analyzing people who are actually alive (and posting), mate.


Dormio:
HOLY MOLEY dormio is in this game?
[literally anything Dormio says in any Mafia game ever]
Quote

DIE SCUM DIE
##Unvote:
##Vote Dormio








##Unvote
I'm kidding, Dormio is p tight with me so far.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 04:44:58 PM
DNA you are analyzing THE SHIT out of these posts way too hard, you seriously need to look at a bigger picture and not sound the alarm every time someone does something slightly weird, like use an odd color or use a weird term.

Like, I could ask Kilga on his opinion of brown bears and I bet he would see it as some silly codeword for "DAYVIG THE GUY" instead of realizing that I could just post in the Scum QT if we were buddies.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 05, 2013, 04:45:41 PM
I'm not going to hammer myself :p
Especially not when instead I can get another 48 hours of watching you talk about how I'm scum of the earth. I'm narcissistic that way.

Neko: Actually I just wanted to see if you'd flip out when you saw why I was voting you. Being suicidal means I don't need logical reasons for the things I do. I don't think you're scum anymore. I'm weak to people being cool to me so I waited until you talked about me, despite liking your Sky P case.

Which sadly means I'm going to have to make a case on someone else I supose.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 04:47:53 PM
Quote
Actually I just wanted to see if you'd flip out when you saw why I was voting you.
I don't flip out until I have half the votes needed for a lynch.

Quote
Which sadly means I'm going to have to make a case on someone else I supose.
Also, "sadly"? :smug:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 04:53:15 PM
Hey Kilga if a tree falls on a brown bear alone in the woods, does the Pope's hat still look funny?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: SB on November 05, 2013, 05:00:53 PM
##Unvote

##Vote: PX
##Unvote

##Vote: Validon
##Unvote

##Vote: NNR
##Unvote
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 05:08:46 PM
Whatever SB is saying, I should probably cut down on the attitude. I'm probably feeling silly because I'm tired as crap.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 05, 2013, 05:11:07 PM
NNR used 'policy kill' instead of 'policy lyncch. Scumslip much?
At this point I've given up on questioning your logic but this is just too absurd. What?

FINALLY someone who understands who moronic that line of thinking is!
Hey, I thought the same about you just a bit ago! Imagine that.

In all seriousness Cheez needs a vote, he's been sitting on it far too long for him not have at least a vauge idea of who he thinks is scummy, and "somebody" is always better then "nada jack shit". His posts are mostly just setup spec too, which is terribad.
Sure thing. Let's see... Well, I still think Dormio is scummy. Kilga concerns me but either he's town or he's good at being scum, because I can't really make a case for him yet. Shadoweh used to concern me but as she posts more I'm seeing less reason to be concerned. Dormio's really the only player who I'm confident in mistrusting at the moment, so I guess that makes my course of action kind of clear.

##Vote: Dormio

I completely understand that Dormio is not one of the main suspects at the moment but if I'm going to vote then dang it I'm going to vote for someone who won't easily convince me they're town.

I wasn't aware I was so concerned with the setup. Was I really, NNR?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 05, 2013, 05:27:48 PM
Oh hey
Validon: I'm totes going to ignore him today, Serela flipped him as a Neighbor or something... heh, and they have shared votes.
Yeah, I'm just going to file him under "town" for now, I'm lazy. Also I was at one point destined to get that role, and I never role scum, so that just seals the deal.
I'm assuming you meant Palidon Polaris for this, right? The Validon that people are talking about is someone completely different. I don't think you've brought him up yet, actually.

gah too many seven-letter names with the same consonant-vowel pattern
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Raikaria on November 05, 2013, 05:29:47 PM
Votecount 2.5

Shadoweh (2): Sky_Paladin, Validon98
Validon98 (2): Polaris, PX
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio,
NekoNekoRex (1): Shadoweh
Dormio (1): Cheez8

Not Voting (4): Kilgamayan, Darkninjaabc, SB, NekoNekoRex

It's 6 to lynch
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)

Also; I will just point out that something like this:

##Unvote
##Vote: [REDACTED to avoid hammer] (Hint it's Shadoweh)

...
DIE SCUM DIE
##Unvote:
##Vote Dormio



##Unvote

Makes things annoying for votecount purposes; and probobly falls under 'artificially inflating words' in my opinion to bypass the counter. Although the ultimate decision on the matter is BT's. This applies to SB as well as NNR; and anyone else who thinks of copying.

<BT> It's NBD and there shouldn't be any posts a la ED1 that I should be ignoring at this stage anyway
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 05:41:01 PM
##Vote: Shadoweh

Gonna have to wait until I get home before I can properly digest everything NNR has produced, but just based on the volume and him actually being willing to accuse people of being scum I'd at least put him lower on the scum list than Validon and PX. Possibly Dormio too, since I don't remember him doing much of anything today.

I'm starting to waver a little bit on Cheez, he's made a few role-related word trickeration attempts today that look town-motivated if misguided. I dunno, I might just suck at finding newbie scum. I've liked Sky Paladin for most of the game but a few people seem to disagree there. Regardless, if the remaining two scum aren't some combination of Validon, PX, Dormio, and NNR then I'm going to be miffed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 05, 2013, 06:39:08 PM
Vote NNR

At work
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 05, 2013, 07:14:57 PM
Study hall means I'm here briefly, but I've got to do work after this post and I probably won't be able to respond to anything for a while.

@Sky_Paladin: You asked me about why I'm not exactly "okay" with implying NNR is scum, and that's mainly because at that point he had just started making his reads and he said stuff about you and you're immediately like "yeah he's totally scum trying to get heat off of Shadoweh." I mean, I honestly don't think you would be saying that if he had been talking about anyone but you, so that's why I wasn't okay with it. Of course, I don't particularly agree with his thoughts, but you're like "OH MAN HIS ARGUMENTS ARE BAD HE'S TOTALLY SCUM GUYS," and we already have had enough cases of people being jumped on for bad play. It is really annoying this time around because NNR has been forced to inherit a slot with a significant amount of lurkiness behind him, which means he's already in the hotseat and honestly he should be given a bit of room before everyone goes crazy on him. Does that mean "don't ever lynch him"? No, it does not. It means I don't agree with immediately jumping on top of him when he's just trying to make up for CF7's lack of effort.
This is also why I was angered with Shadoweh's vote on him, because he hadn't even gotten the chance to say anything yet, and since it is clear now that he is going to put in the effort, it makes Shadoweh's vote on him even worse.

As for what NNR has said so far, I will say that some of the stuff he's said is kind of... yeah. He alternates between posts that just make me go "wait what" to some sort of observation that makes sense. I'm not particularly happy about him just going "lol going to ignore D1, going to ignore [INSERT PLAYER HERE]" and similar things. It's troublesome and if it keeps up then I'm just going to say "screw it" and switch my vote to him. The only things stopping me from doing that are:

A- Shadoweh has not really made an actual case on anyone else yet/hasn't said much more on why she thinks NNR is scummy now that he has actually posted. She just basically said "well okay he said something about me I don't think he's scum anymore" and that was it. Just completely dropping it. It's like "well I don't know what else to do right now," and I see that as scummy. Where is the "I'M ON A [INSERT SUSPECTED SCUM NAME] TRAIN CHOO CHOO" I'm so used to? The lack of that just doesn't come across as townie (particularly since almost every game I've seen you with that mentality, you've been town despite me thinking it was scum motivated in every case, which in hindsight was because that was when I thought reckless pushing denoted scum when it really doesn't).
B- NNR still has to understand what the fuck has been going on up to this point. Once he's fully "with it" and has his reads and reasons, then that's when I think it would be better to start judging. Granted, it's not the best strategy all the time, but I'm not just willing to jump on someone replacing in right off the bat.

Okay, will be back later, writing this post took a lot longer than I thought and I REALLY need to get back to homework etc.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 07:17:10 PM
Oh heyI'm assuming you meant Palidon Polaris for this, right? The Validon that people are talking about is someone completely different. I don't think you've brought him up yet, actually.

gah too many seven-letter names with the same consonant-vowel pattern
Yeah, speaking of which, I need to read Validon
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 07:24:35 PM
Quote
I wasn't aware I was so concerned with the setup. Was I really, NNR?
Considering up till now I haven't really read you post anything questioning the motives of others, yeah.
Is your Dormio vote due in any solid reasoning, Cheez, or is it just a gut feeling?

Also apparently people are going to think I'm scummy for wanting to avoid the trainwrecks that are D1 and DNA's posts. I think I'm going to take this game as seriously as the setup is implied to be, which would be "not very", so that's okay. No peel off my banana (is that an analogy that fits here? Hell if I know).

Actually I don't think anyone's really brought up a point as to why I'm scummy other then "I'm being deliberately lazy and admitting it"
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 05, 2013, 07:29:38 PM
I was really hoping you would be super scummy. It would have been easier then having to go back on what I've been doing since yesterday. <_<
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 07:43:09 PM
I'm only obligated to find one scum at a time, really. If DNA and Polaris are scum, doesn't matter much to me, there's still one other out there, lol.

Anyway Validon.
Quote
and the fact that I didn't really have anything to add to the conversation
This kind of immediately sends off alarm bells when I read it. There's always SOMETHING to add imo, whether it's just pushing some guy hard or adding more reads to your repertoire. Minor issue but makes me wonder about your motives a bit.

His big readpost has a suspicious lack of scumreads too, which is ehhhhgh. He does vote Shadoweh though! Which is good! (if not what everyone else is doing, but Shadoweh is super lame scum, so I digress).
I guess I'll give him the token "Validon who are your top 4 scumreads?" and call it that./ He reads null I suppose. Why did people want to lynch him ED2?

Cut by glad Shadoweh is rooting for my continued superior scumhunting townplay over here.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 07:51:24 PM
So I read Polaris and got some insight into Validon. Well, not really, Polaris is just miffed at Validon's lust for ISOing me despite being under the radar.
Not seeing too much wrong with Polaris either. I guess this is why pressing Validon for a list of scumpicks is a good idea I suppose
Not seeing too much bad into Polaris, really.

PX is a typical PX, also a hypocrite for prodding me to post moar.

I guess that clears out the remote possibility that I'm intentionally ignoring up to two other people who may actually be my scumbuddies (a fact I'm sure Darkninja would have been the first to notice, then alert everyone in a big, incoherent paragraph, followed by a paranoia-fueled vote)

I hope DNA isn't getting too hurt by my continued rampant satirizing of him. Mention it if you are, I'll just stop.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 07:54:44 PM
I'm an equal-opportunity parodyizer.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 08:04:40 PM
I liked the part where PX told us why Shadowy is town. (Or why NNR is scum. Or why Serela was scun, for that matter.) Are you trying to get lynched the instant Shadowy flips scum?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 05, 2013, 08:27:08 PM
Clearly he is trying to powerbus his scumbuddy of choice again a la Pictures of Birds
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 05, 2013, 09:22:12 PM
Considering up till now I haven't really read you post anything questioning the motives of others, yeah.
Is your Dormio vote due in any solid reasoning, Cheez, or is it just a gut feeling?
I don't know what counts as solid but I can sure give you reasons I suspect him.

The first post of his that made me suspicious was #80 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038388.html#msg1038388), where he casually points out how Serela didn't develop an opinion yet. This was still pretty early in Day 1, at a time when remotely serious discussion had only begun less than a page ago. First, "no good opinions as of yet" was an ENTIRELY valid stance at the time, though that's not the point. It would be one thing if Dormio had outright accused Serela of being scummy for this- if that was the case, Dormio would be protected with the "bad play =/= scummy play" argument. But he didn't. Instead what he did was bring up a point that could spur people to keep an eye on Serela without making a case out of it himself. That's what really makes this feel like a scummy move to me: bringing up a (flawed) point against Serela without pushing it so that he could get people to start suspecting a townie without being pegged as the person who started making cases against him.

Sometime shortly afterwards when he votes for Serela (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038535.html#msg1038535) he says that me "buddying pretty hard to Serela raises a lot of eyebrows" even though I don't think I really buddied with Serela that hard (or at all.) The closest I came to that at the time was when I brought up the first post I mentioned here and pointed out that he's pointed this out about Serela at a time where I could reasonably expect a similar stance from about half the people playing the game. There was a second mention of this when I mentioned some people I had slight suspicions about at that point but that was it. I made no direct mentions of Serela in those posts, and no mention at all otherwise.

A lot of his posts from there on are replying to or accusing Serela for a while. He also starts trying to look like he's making useful comments in the meantime with posts like this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038645.html#msg1038645) but this sort of thing isn't contribution so much as plain old observation or things that don't contribute anything at all. This is what "fluff" means, isn't it? I think examples like that post are really helping me fully grasp the terms you guys use here.
(He also says things including but not limited to "other people covered it so I won't mention it" in that post. I don't think things like that are sufficient grounds to suspect anybody but apparently a bunch of you do, as well as Dormio himself sometimes, so here you go! Feast away.)

I nearly brought up both the way he was pushing the wagon really hard to get it rolling and the way he clammed up and let other people finish accusing Serela for him at the end, but then I realized I was doing that thing where everything somebody does looks like a scumtell if you assume they're scum first. Thinking about it again, pushing somebody you think is scum is completely fine and I GUESS it's okay to drop it and let other people finish up once you feel like you're finished doing your part, but staying quiet for the full last four or five pages of Day 1 seems like a little much. There was a point where one or two people unvoted Serela and it looked like the wagon could turn around. I'd think that a townie going after someone they believe to be scum would be less concerned with how they look or the fact that they're drawing attention to themselves and more concerned about the possibility that a member of the scumteam could get off the hook.

There you go. That first thing is still the major reason I'm clinging on to and I might not have noticed certain other reasons until I re-read his posts with him being scum in mind but at least SOME of this is has a good basis.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 05, 2013, 09:23:50 PM
Possibly Dormio too, since I don't remember him doing much of anything today.
My neck and shoulders hurt but I'm here now.
I should also probably comment on the whole Shadoweh thing.

But, first, I wonder if you guys won't listen to why Sky Palladium is scum.
I mean, I made a post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039899.html#msg1039899) but it doesn't seem like anybody other than Kilga and Sky Palladium really read it.
And for Kilga I made this response:
I dunno. Sky Palladium demonstrated competence and a willingness to abuse newbmeta last game.
Which I get the feeling was ignored too.

So, like, let's get right back on this.
First things first, let's take a look at Sky Palladium's response here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039957.html#msg1039957).
It's literally nothing but excuses and some appeal to emotion.
You'll note that my behaviour with not-lynching Serela is the same as not wanting to lynch day 1 in the previous game. 
And this line?
I don't know about you, but to me, this line looks pretty much exactly like the type of meta abuse that Sky Palladium used last game when he claimed to think that the game was over.

And then, if we look at Sky Palladium's content in general today, it's not much better.
I mean like, there's some NK analysis and some excuses for his own behaviours.
Not really the shining paradigms that a your average townie should be aiming for.
They are, however, great methods, in my opinion, to look like you're contributing to the discussion and looking totally active.

Anyway, I'll post my thoughts about Shadoweh SOON?.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Fuck.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 05, 2013, 09:36:29 PM
Quick response to Cheez8's accusations.

The first post of his that made me suspicious was #80 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038388.html#msg1038388), where he casually points out how Serela didn't develop an opinion yet. This was still pretty early in Day 1, at a time when remotely serious discussion had only begun less than a page ago. First, "no good opinions as of yet" was an ENTIRELY valid stance at the time, though that's not the point. It would be one thing if Dormio had outright accused Serela of being scummy for this- if that was the case, Dormio would be protected with the "bad play =/= scummy play" argument. But he didn't. Instead what he did was bring up a point that could spur people to keep an eye on Serela without making a case out of it himself. That's what really makes this feel like a scummy move to me: bringing up a (flawed) point against Serela without pushing it so that he could get people to start suspecting a townie without being pegged as the person who started making cases against him.
Uh, I was in class at the time, which is not the best environment for playing mafia and writing up cases since I'm trying to write down notes.
If you read you'll see that I mentioned this and said that I would be posting properly once I got home.
Notice how I voted Serela once I got home.
Also, I refute your argument that Serela not developing an opinion was alright.
Why do you believe this to be the case?
As you mention yourself, there was some serious discussion starting and to simply respond by saying the equivalent of "I DON'T WANT TO READ WORDS TO FORM OPINIONS" is pretty scummy in my eyes.

Sometime shortly afterwards when he votes for Serela (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038535.html#msg1038535) he says that me "buddying pretty hard to Serela raises a lot of eyebrows" even though I don't think I really buddied with Serela that hard (or at all.) The closest I came to that at the time was when I brought up the first post I mentioned here and pointed out that he's pointed this out about Serela at a time where I could reasonably expect a similar stance from about half the people playing the game. There was a second mention of this when I mentioned some people I had slight suspicions about at that point but that was it. I made no direct mentions of Serela in those posts, and no mention at all otherwise.
I don't see why you're trying to cover yourself so much here.
Like, this post is supposed to be about why you suspect me, right?
So why is the entirety of this paragraph an explanation for your own behaviours?
Also, why are you trying to distance yourself from the buddying accusations with weak claims like "I made no direct mention of Serela in those posts" when it's painfully obvious who you're referring to?

A lot of his posts from there on are replying to or accusing Serela for a while. He also starts trying to look like he's making useful comments in the meantime with posts like this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038645.html#msg1038645) but this sort of thing isn't contribution so much as plain old observation or things that don't contribute anything at all. This is what "fluff" means, isn't it? I think examples like that post are really helping me fully grasp the terms you guys use here.
(He also says things including but not limited to "other people covered it so I won't mention it" in that post. I don't think things like that are sufficient grounds to suspect anybody but apparently a bunch of you do, as well as Dormio himself sometimes, so here you go! Feast away.)
Uh, I don't get what you're trying to say here.
What's so bad about me trying to get Serela lynched?
And so you don't think that an observation about how CF7 was setting himself up to jump onto wagons if they happen while not delivering any actual content of his own is fluff? Okay.

I nearly brought up both the way he was pushing the wagon really hard to get it rolling and the way he clammed up and let other people finish accusing Serela for him at the end, but then I realized I was doing that thing where everything somebody does looks like a scumtell if you assume they're scum first. Thinking about it again, pushing somebody you think is scum is completely fine and I GUESS it's okay to drop it and let other people finish up once you feel like you're finished doing your part, but staying quiet for the full last four or five pages of Day 1 seems like a little much. There was a point where one or two people unvoted Serela and it looked like the wagon could turn around. I'd think that a townie going after someone they believe to be scum would be less concerned with how they look or the fact that they're drawing attention to themselves and more concerned about the possibility that a member of the scumteam could get off the hook.
I kind of wasn't there.
Also, how does that last sentence even make sense?
Serela kind of flipped town.
Assuming that I were scum like you say I am, how could it possibly be the case that my disappearance at the end of D1 was an attempt to save my scumbuddy Serela?

Anyway, back to making :wikipedia: about Swadomeh.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 05, 2013, 09:37:26 PM
Still at work, won't be home until tonight. But I never said Serela was scum, I said I thought he was town but got cut by him self hammering. Also, NNR is claiming scum. And please, mislynch me if you wish, I need to work on NaNoWriMo anyways. Also, phone posting with a new phone is hard.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: SB on November 05, 2013, 09:46:30 PM
##Vote: NNR
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 05, 2013, 09:58:35 PM
Votecount 2.6

Shadoweh (3): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Kilgamayan
NekoNekoRex (3): Shadoweh, PX, SB
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
Dormio (1): Cheez8
Validon98 (1): Polaris

Not Voting (2): Darkninjaabc, NekoNekoRex

It's 6 to lynch and 31 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 10:01:15 PM
ffs

This better be good reading when I get home.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 05, 2013, 10:52:42 PM
Quick post before dinner in response to NNR. You asked for my top four scumreads. Before I say them, holy crap that's a tall order you've asked from me. I mean, having multiple scumreads is definitely a thing, but I don't think everyone could just pull up four ones they are certain of. In fact, I only have the one solid scumread and the others are just people I suspect of being scummy but I'm unsure of.

Shadoweh: I've said why already. I'm in a rush so I can't exactly spell out all of my reasons again.
Sky_Paladin: He's more leaning scum than anything mainly because I'm irked at his comments on you and his willingness to jump you so quickly. I personally have found you more towny than some other people here.
PX: I let him off the hook before but his lack of mostly anything today besides saying stuff about me and then voting NNR without explanation isn't giving me warm fuzzy feelings. He might have a reason when he gets home but still that doesn't excuse him leaving his vote on me and then disappearing.
Dark: People have said he's town, but his posts are kind of making me go urgh more and more. I still can't shake the feeling he's scum, but I don't know. He's more null than anything but well he's still leaning more scum than my other nullreads, so...

And that's all for now. Will be back later if needed.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 05, 2013, 11:05:58 PM
But I never said Serela was scum

I agree! Which is why I asked, since you did vote for him and everything.

Regardless I am interested in hearing what you have to say in full when you get home but I want to see what Shadowy does with her vote first.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 05, 2013, 11:27:51 PM
Quote
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Huh, I never noticed this message before.

Anyway. Food was had and I feel a bit better maybe.
Now, words. Hopefully about Shadoweh this time.
Since the leading wagons seem to be NNR and Shadoweh after all.

So a quick mention of NNR's content would involve me basically saying that I don't particularly dislike NNR right now.
Aside from the excessive non-posting at the start so keep working on that.

Which leaves us with Shadoweh.
Firstly, like on D1, I find myself attracted to Kilga's words.
Useless bunnies good only for their sex appeal.

Moving on, Shadoweh's more recent activity is kind of reminding me of the game of Chicken or something.
Wherein Shadoweh is basically just going "I bet you won't actually lynch me" without really doing anything else because she hopes that blind confidence will save her.
Or something.

Also, this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039983.html#msg1039983) doesn't sit right with me.
This part in particular:
Cut: ..That's a good catch. You're alright Cheez, you're alright.
BT's told us that flavour means nothing in this game.
Shadoweh should know that flavour means nothing in this game, especially considering she participated in my random rotten fruit banter at the beginning of the game.
So, it's like, why is she trying to throw Cheez8 a clear for noticing something with the flavour?
I dunno, it just reads as being super off to me.
This may or may not be related to my Cheez8 suspicions.

Warning - while you were typing 6 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Goddamnit.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 05, 2013, 11:37:07 PM
Also, I refute your argument that Serela not developing an opinion was alright.
Why do you believe this to be the case?
As you mention yourself, there was some serious discussion starting and to simply respond by saying the equivalent of "I DON'T WANT TO READ WORDS TO FORM OPINIONS" is pretty scummy in my eyes.
Because that early in the game it really WAS difficult to come up with an opinion that was worth believing. Wanting more to work with makes sense to me.

I don't see why you're trying to cover yourself so much here.
Like, this post is supposed to be about why you suspect me, right?
So why is the entirety of this paragraph an explanation for your own behaviours?
Also, why are you trying to distance yourself from the buddying accusations with weak claims like "I made no direct mention of Serela in those posts" when it's painfully obvious who you're referring to?
I think it was just because you were saying things that weren't true. And uh... actually that's basically it. Still, the only times I brought up Serela were the times I brought up your post about Serela and when I was doing that I was referring to you.

Lies accompanying a vote don't sit well with me, okay?


Uh, I don't get what you're trying to say here.
What's so bad about me trying to get Serela lynched?
And so you don't think that an observation about how CF7 was setting himself up to jump onto wagons if they happen while not delivering any actual content of his own is fluff? Okay.
Nah, CF7's posts had a lot of fluff too. That doesn't say anything about yours.

I kind of wasn't there.
Also, how does that last sentence even make sense?
Serela kind of flipped town.
Assuming that I were scum like you say I am, how could it possibly be the case that my disappearance at the end of D1 was an attempt to save my scumbuddy Serela?
For some reason I keep thinking you were there. I guess I can't prove it though.
Anyway... huh? I don't follow. Yes, Serela flipped town. If he didn't, why would I still be so suspicious of you? My point was that you backed off near the end so you wouldn't become the person pushing for Serela's lynch the entire time. You were saving your image, not Serela. If you weren't a mafia member, you wouldn't have been concerned with that and would have made sure he was lynched, considering you were so certain he was scum.
Of course that part all assumes you were around. Maybe I should put less stock in it.

If we're talking about those two wagons then yeah I kind of have to agree Shadoweh's looking a lot worse than NNR right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 11:57:49 PM
I'm not sure if I understand the NNR wagon correctly, if there even is proper reasoning ?_? like of course SB can't say anything and Shadoweh is a weenie and PX is ??? so huh.

##Unvote
##Vote Shadoweh


Like I said I would.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 05, 2013, 11:58:40 PM
ok I misread the situation, PX is going to get to us when he has the time. carry on.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 06, 2013, 12:46:59 AM
>Cheez8 post
>watisthisidonteven

Because that early in the game it really WAS difficult to come up with an opinion that was worth believing. Wanting more to work with makes sense to me.
I think it was just because you were saying things that weren't true. And uh... actually that's basically it.
There was content, you said so yourself, and you can form opinions about content when it's there.
Whining that you have nothing to work with is nothing more than an excuse.
I really don't get why you're trying to push this point so much.
I guess it must be really hard to look for a case when you're scum. :)

Still, the only times I brought up Serela were the times I brought up your post about Serela and when I was doing that I was referring to you.

Lies accompanying a vote don't sit well with me, okay?
And, uh, tell me how this is supposed to change the fact that you were buddying up to Serela by defending him at the time?
I'll also note that you're still trying to hide this even though it's as clear as day.

Nah, CF7's posts had a lot of fluff too. That doesn't say anything about yours.
I think you missed the meaning of my sentence entirely.
But whatever.

Anyway... huh? I don't follow. Yes, Serela flipped town. If he didn't, why would I still be so suspicious of you? My point was that you backed off near the end so you wouldn't become the person pushing for Serela's lynch the entire time. You were saving your image, not Serela. If you weren't a mafia member, you wouldn't have been concerned with that and would have made sure he was lynched, considering you were so certain he was scum.
The fuck?
I backed off at the end? I didn't want to be the person pushing for Serela's lynch for the entirety of D1?
What a fool I was to have not realized that making a case against Serela for the entire day was actually a secret ploy by me to be all ambiguous so that I wouldn't take any flak for the lynch I had no part in.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 06, 2013, 12:47:49 AM
Still at work, won't be home until tonight. But I never said Serela was scum, I said I thought he was town but got cut by him self hammering. Also, NNR is claiming scum. And please, mislynch me if you wish, I need to work on NaNoWriMo anyways. Also, phone posting with a new phone is hard.
ahahahahaha what? Are you serious? How do you even infer that from a joke post referencing a past game? How can you even claim I'm scumbuddies with you (essentially what that accusation boils down to) and then turn around and reverse my post by claiming innocent?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 06, 2013, 12:52:14 AM
I can't believe I'm getting wagoned by the caseless, basless, scum, the inactive, and the chicago voter.

Now I've seen everything
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 06, 2013, 01:14:36 AM
Validon's response makes me feel better about him by a lot. I didn't say they had to be really solid reads but he tried his best anyway, which I like.

Cheez8, can you update your line of thoughts to go with Dormio's D2 posts? What do you think about the Paladin case?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 06, 2013, 01:17:09 AM
##Vote: Shadoweh

If I can't lynch him, I want to see SP lynched instead. Or PX if he's going to dick around and take my posts so out of context they're flying out of orbit.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 01:20:54 AM
##Unvote: Shadoweh

Regardless I am interested in hearing what (PX has) to say in full when (he gets) home but I want to see what Shadowy does with her vote first.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 06, 2013, 02:29:06 AM
I can't believe I'm getting wagoned by the caseless, basless, scum, the inactive, and the chicago voter.

Now I've seen everything

If there is ever a time when I look back on the worst wagons that I've ever seen in a game of Mafia, this would have to be among the top two (the other one was where in a game of Epic Mafia town discovered someone was a cultist and that cultist managed to avoid being lynched by saying he knew other cultists, then lied and said I was one, causing me to get powerlynched without so much as a word of defense besides something along the lines of "WHY ARE YOU TRUSTING THE CULTIST SERIOUSLY WHAT THE FUCK").
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 03:59:02 AM
If we could get that PXplanation before I go to bed I'd be most appreciative. I'd rather not have to parse it in a half-asleep state.

I should probably warn everyone that I will be away from my computer for most of tomorrow. I'll have my phone, but no guarantees of expedience or even competence.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 04:39:04 AM
(At this point I don't care what Shadowy does with her vote, I care more about the explanation)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 06, 2013, 04:52:11 AM
There was content, you said so yourself, and you can form opinions about content when it's there.
Whining that you have nothing to work with is nothing more than an excuse.
I really don't get why you're trying to push this point so much.
I guess it must be really hard to look for a case when you're scum. :)
All town opinions were extremely weak at that point, with most of the opinions that did exist turning up as either null reads or unsubstantiated hunches (or completely off the walls.)

And, uh, tell me how this is supposed to change the fact that you were buddying up to Serela by defending him at the time?
I'll also note that you're still trying to hide this even though it's as clear as day.
I'm not hiding anything. I'm standing by my assertion. What's truly clear as day here is that my intent was never to defend Serela and I hardly brought the issue up, so your claim that I was buddying pretty hard is misleading and wrong.

I think you missed the meaning of my sentence entirely.
But whatever.
Oh.
...Well I agree.

I'm pretty sure you're misinterpreting the fourth thing too but whatever. I'll let it drop since I could be being stupid with this one and you could've actually, you know, left. People tend to do that from time to time after all.

Cheez8, can you update your line of thoughts to go with Dormio's D2 posts? What do you think about the Paladin case?
Probably.
I guess, before I start, my stance on Paladin is that he's been saying a lot of things that don't really seem to be well supported, along with a few things that make sense. For a while I brushed this off as me not being able to get a good read on him, but considering his trickery last game I get the feeling I should start suspecting him more than I do.

Actually I don't really have too much to say about Dormio's D2 posts. He's kind of focusing on easy targets but that kind of makes sense regardless of alignment. For mafia, pointing out a suspicious townie is good, and for town, the people you'll point out as mafia will be suspicious. Can't gather anything from that.
He's got some okay points against Paladin and some good but sometimes exaggerated points about me, then nothing about Validon (for good reason, honestly) and a fairly empty argument against Shadoweh (who hasn't given much to work with.) Sadly, based solely off his D2 posts, I'm in a situation where I feel he's either scum making proper cases against townies or a townie making proper cases against scum and without a flip I'm going to have trouble figuring out who the real scum is.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 05:09:51 AM
Going to bed. If I wake up and don't see a post from PX explaining how NNR scumclaimed and why Shadowy is Obvtown McTownie I'm most likely just going to slap my vote back down on Shadowy. I'm irritated with how this day managed to stagnate given how blazingly obvious Shadowy is being.

I do have an observation about the situation of my own that I haven't mentioned yet but I would still rather PX post first.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 06, 2013, 05:21:13 AM
Alright, Neko, I am not really pissed off if scum acts desperate and accuse people to save their own asses. It is only when people actually buy shitty scum arguments (Cheez8's OMGUS d1 crap) when I flip out.

That said I have trouble following what's happening.
Correct me if I am wrong.

Currently we believe Validon, Shadoweh, CF7/NNR are the most scummy, with Cheez8 and PX following. On d1 it was sb /serela/validon.

Validon basically look town now that he's actually crumbing back to his behavior, so we are dropping the votes on him. Shadoweh is somehow hard scum for being laidback? But if you fit a desperate Neko trying to bail out his teammate for both scums are caught redhanded d2 it somehow makes sense. Cheez8 is still oddball without anyone willing to address how attention diverting he's trying to be and that's scummy. PX....i really want to lynch the lurker, but I doubt if we are willing to take this risk.

I think that's about it for notable scumreads from everyone, personally I still kinda doubt. Dormio's pretty weird in how he keeps telling us how many posts he's behind in posting while said new posts never really conflict with his content, somehow it flew under everyone's radar, he's otherwise pretty kilga-ish in being town.
Never trust the too hardtown players too much.

##Vote Shadoweh

I hope I can be back but worst case scenario i will be away from some 6 hours. My opinion about him and Neko and Cheez8 are pretty much dead set though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 06, 2013, 05:42:28 AM
Quote
Alright, Neko, I am not really pissed off if scum acts desperate and accuse people to save their own asses. It is only when people actually buy shitty scum arguments (Cheez8's OMGUS d1 crap) when I flip out.
I don't think you entirely understood what I meant when I was ask- you know what, forget it, I don't think you're going to be bothered either way.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 06, 2013, 05:47:18 AM
Votecount 2.7

Shadoweh (5): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc
NekoNekoRex (3): Shadoweh, PX, SB
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
Dormio (1): Cheez8

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

It's 6 to lynch and 23 hours & 12 minutes remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)

Quote from: bars
PX - 1097
Polaris - 741
Shadoweh - 420
Dormio - 410
Everyone else - 400
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 06, 2013, 08:19:55 AM
OH BOY TIME TO EAT MY OWN BRAINS
Super tempting actually. But it's against my religion.

Apparently Neko is the only counterwagon I've got? >_> Uhm, okay then. I don't know why Kilga keeps yelling at PX, PX's posts seem fine to me. Unlike a certain rabbit.. It helps that PX is the only one doing something besides riding the popular wave. Besides the dead guy. Do you want to disappoint corpse-tan?

I probably should have just replaced out yesterday, but I didn't think being called scum all day erry day would be this draining. I just don't have a grip on who the scum are this game. Maybe I'll have a better idea tomorrow, but I doubt it. Everyone is something. Except Kilga. I am pretty sure at this point he's wearing Tenshi shades and trying to look cool for the rest of his scumteam. It's the only way I can parse someone who makes up their mind in the first 24 hours and never has a change of heart even once. There is no such thing as Town certainty.

Goddamn it Darkninja. I am not scum with NNR. What fits is that today is :effort:post the gathering.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 06, 2013, 09:55:47 AM
Quote
Clearly he is trying to powerbus his scumbuddy of choice again a la Pictures of Birds

This is you claiming to be my scumbuddy, not me :smug:

Also, reading has drained me completely and I don't even know what I'm reading anymore, what are complete thoughts. Reading through basically means.... I got nothing against NNR other than he's an ass, so yeah

Uhhh, I'm actually thinking Kilga is the scum now.

Quote
I'm starting to waver a little bit on Cheez, he's made a few role-related word trickeration attempts today that look town-motivated if misguided. I dunno, I might just suck at finding newbie scum. I've liked Sky Paladin for most of the game but a few people seem to disagree there. Regardless, if the remaining two scum aren't some combination of Validon, PX, Dormio, and NNR then I'm going to be miffed.

This statement is pretty much the worst thing town can ever say, for multiple reasons.
1) It steers town towards a certain direction
2) It causes town to get complacent and basically... stop playing the game while we go down a lynch list
3) I like how you put NNR on the list before actually reading his posts while bashing Shadoweh for voting him for stuff CF7 did or didn't do. :V
4) You've pretty much got all the game focused on Shadoweh now, there's small possibility she's not the lynch today and god dammit is she gonna flip town like I said Serela and Shadoweh would
5) I voted Serela for reactions. Serela's reaction was to self hammer >_>
6) Call it gut, intuition, w/e it's my thoughts and my opinions > yours

Shadoweh, let's be best buds and vote Kilga forever! Or should I just end your suffering now?

Dormio is town for trying to play the game :V
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 06, 2013, 09:56:10 AM
Unvote
Vote: Kilga
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 06, 2013, 09:57:19 AM
I can't believe I'm getting wagoned by the caseless, basless, scum, the inactive, and the chicago voter.

Now I've seen everything

Ahahahahah hell no

You can't claim shit about worst wagon ever.

I got voted down to L-1 in 24 hours of D1. With half the wagon being RVS votes. And then I got quick wagon'd to death because scum got modkilled while defending me. Fuck CotA
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 06, 2013, 09:58:11 AM
Oh, I just saw BT is trying to replace me >_>

Uhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 06, 2013, 10:00:25 AM
Read your PMs.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: PX on November 06, 2013, 10:02:20 AM
Ehhhh, I'm not really in the mood for mafia, sure it's lame to replace out but

[02:00:20] <PX> @choose stay in or replace out
[02:00:23] <Keine-tan> I choose...replace out! ^_^V

Keine makes all my decisions ;_;

Sorry Mitsuki, have fun
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 06, 2013, 10:09:11 AM
PM has yet to be sent (as requested) but Mitsuki replaces PX.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 12:07:32 PM
( ̄へ ̄)

Well okay then.

That list of people is my list of people that aren't town reads. This should be fairly obvious from my comments throughout the game, particularly given the unsubstantiated list I threw out near the beginning of today. NNR is on the list because he's not a townread. I did read through his posts and they seemed okay enough, but the playerslot was nonexistence enough for a long enough time that it's not enough to convince me of his towniness yet. He's not a high vote priority, though.

Also I still see no reasons why Shadowy is town. Not that it matters now, I guess.

Speaking of! I find it further indicative of NNR being a votepark for Shadowy by her bailing on the case right as two other players decide to vote for NNR as well. SB the known-town changed his mind entirely from voting Shadowy to voting NNR, and PX was acting super-confident about NNR's scumminess. If Shadowy truly originally believed NNR was scum, why would she not put on the brakes and try to reread NNR and figure out where these opinions came from? I would think that someone with only one actual suspicion that's starting to waver would be snapped back into focus by other people joining her (including one person that had previously been voting for them). But there's no effort to take a second look at NNR, nor is there even any acknowledgment of these vote changes as they happen. Probably because NNR was never a scum read, because, y'know, Shadowy's scum.

Speaking of NNR, I find it cute that Shadowy gets offended at the suggestion that NNR is her scumbuddy while dropping Tenshi's name twice today now. Tenshi spent a lot of time voting for Kaori for lurking, clearly they weren't a scumpair either! ヽ( ̄▽ ̄)ノ

4) You've pretty much got all the game focused on Shadoweh now

It's the only way I can parse someone who makes up their mind in the first 24 hours and never has a change of heart even once. There is no such thing as Town certainty.

I guess that when someone starts the day bad and only gets worse the town way to play is to stop pushing the case against them and change your mind after 48 hours. >_> I'm calling attention to and voting for Shadowy because she's scum and I'm not gonna let that go until she dies (or convinces me she's not scum, which I'll admit is about 99% impossible right now).
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 12:20:43 PM
(ftr I do plan on spending the game night reviewing Sky Paladin and deciding if my town read of him still applies)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: SB on November 06, 2013, 12:41:21 PM
##Unvote
##Vote: Shadoweh

##Unvote
##Vote: Validon

##Unvote
##Vote: Mitsuki

##Unvote
##Vote: NNR
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 06, 2013, 02:10:58 PM
Well PX is replacing out. Urghy feelings are still abound on him as of now, but of course it wouldn't be fair to not give Mitsuki a fair chance to actually do something with the slot rather than let it wither and die as PX was sort of doing. I still don't trust the slot but who knows, maybe Mitsuki will actually put in the effort PX failed to. :V

Until then, let me just say PX's reasons on Kilga are sort of... ergh. Kilga does technically have a list of his non-town reads and yes people might follow them, but certainly that doesn't mean everyone will jump on them. Also, if he just listed them without reason then it would be scummy, but he has provided justification for his reads. This is also why he is so focused on Shadoweh because, as everyone should know by now if they have been paying attention (and I swear I'm saying this for the millionth time), Shadoweh parked on CF7 yesterday, then parked her vote on NNR today, and she just backed off the wagon without really any reason besides "well he did something and it looks townie so eh." This lack of conviction I'm so used to from Shadoweh screams scummy to me, and I honestly don't see why PX doesn't find some amount of fault with it.

Will be back later, study hall will be ending within twenty minutes and I just wanted to get additional thoughts down on the little that's happened since I was here yesterday.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 06, 2013, 02:51:37 PM
I would feel more bad for Shadoweh if he didn't continue to park his vote on me :V

Don't really like PX (mostly because that was his one comprehensive post I've seen) but he's replacing  out anyways so w/e. Notably his Kilga suspicions match my gutread on him, but that's about it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 06, 2013, 05:14:25 PM
Votecount 2.8

Shadoweh (5): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc
NekoNekoRex (2): Shadoweh, SB
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
Dormio (1): Cheez8
Kilgamayan (1): Mitsuki

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

It's 6 to lynch and 12 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
I'm all set to hammer Shadowy as necessary, though I'll allow some time for SB to post at least once more before that in case he has anything else he wishes to communicate.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 05:34:33 PM
Hello everyone! \(owo)/ DON'T HAMMER YET

I'm not going to vote for Shadoweh nor NNR, probably not even to secure a lynch in case my vote was needed. Overall all the points that have been brought against them seem neutral tells to me (I have to admit that I haven't paid too much attention, but I'm quite sure that won't change anyways). Particulary, Shadoweh's lack of motivation is a neutral tell for her while NNR seems to be doing fine from what I've seen.

Usually it would be fine to vote them at least to secure a lynch, but I'm very sure about who is scum this time (well, at least about two of them), so voting someone else would be voting town. Don't expect me to do that.

But who am I scumreading, anyways?


Kilgamayan

I have a lot of reasons to suspect him, actually.

First of all, I'm taking SB's death into account.
Scum wouldn't want to use their roleblocker constanty on the same person (Dark) if they took into account the existence of a doctor (I remind everyone that explaining why SB was killed still requires scum taking into account a potential doctor), because if they thought that the doctor would keep protecting Kilga (which the SB kill also supposedly implies) they'd do something more useful in the long term with their kill and risk it, otherwise they'd be fucked: Kilga would eventually provide material to lynch them all. (Basically, scum wouldn't let both Kilga and Dark live unless they were really sure of who the doc is, which is not the case.)
So if scum didn't think of that and SB died instead of one of them, that probably means that either Kilga or Dark are scum.

But Dark is being very townie, while Kilga has done other scummy things. Like this:

Serela if you're town stop being defeatist and actually push a case on someone else >_>

(one of the many posts encouraging Serela to play when he was getting lynched) and

C'mon, Shadowy. If you're gonna go down like this the least you could do is try to push your "case" by linking the Downfall video so we can all get a few chuckles out of the whole thing.

Why would Kilga try to encourage his suspects to play if he was town and really thought they are scummy? I just get the feeling that he's frustrated scum because of everything being too easy to him when he actually wants to put effort and earn his victory.

And anyways, if he really wanted to see more content from them he'd be doing an entirely different thing, like asking them questions about their thoughts. There's also the fact that if he felt he hadn't seen enough from them he wouldn't be voting them with the reasons he's given. (o_o)

Then maybe you should invest time in digging up and rehashing why people should vote Shadowy ahead of you! Polaris is not going to get lynched today, stop wasting time on him! I really shouldn't be needing to hold a townie hand through this process!

And this is Kilga basically coaching his suspect yet again, but the part about the ?townie hand? is so fake that it made me stare at the screen in wonder.
Basic Psychology lessons, part 1: When people praise themselves just like that and out of context when there was no need to do so and it doesn't seem coherent with their personality, DOUBT THEM. It's obvious they want to reinforce a certain impression of themselves with that, and that's probably because they're lying or going to lie at some point.

Another thing I don't like is how he postpones voting Validon both D1 and D2 while still saying he's scummy. After dropping him he doesn't update his case on him either.I'd expect town to still elaborate on their other main suspect, or at least comment on something.
He actually just mentions Validon in one post after the D2 voteswitch:

Gonna have to wait until I get home before I can properly digest everything NNR has produced, but just based on the volume and him actually being willing to accuse people of being scum I'd at least put him lower on the scum list than Validon and PX. Possibly Dormio too, since I don't remember him doing much of anything today.

I'm starting to waver a little bit on Cheez, he's made a few role-related word trickeration attempts today that look town-motivated if misguided. I dunno, I might just suck at finding newbie scum. I've liked Sky Paladin for most of the game but a few people seem to disagree there. Regardless, if the remaining two scum aren't some combination of Validon, PX, Dormio, and NNR then I'm going to be miffed.

Which basically just states that he keeps suspecting Validon.


Also, the D2 change of vote (from Validon to Shadoweh) was just based on her vote on NNR being interpreted as a votepark and her not paying attention to the thread, which is way weaker than his Validon case.

But it's not just that, he was supposed to want to lynch Validon since D1 but then there's this:

Cut by another Validon vote. Not sure I like it being a parrot when I wanted to see where Cheez's Dormio suspicions would go, as much as I can't disagree with Validon votes right now.

Here he's not happy with Cheez voting Validon, but Cheez updated his reasoning on Dormio and thought Validon was scummier anyways, so I don't understant such a reaction.

This validates PX's main argument against your Validon vote, I think.

Here he's defending Validon.

I could get behind any of Serela, Validon, Shadowy, or SB as lynch candidates, in roughly that order.

? while still wanting to lynch him. Yes, in the same post.
I get that could happen to town, too. But that's not the only time he's discouraged votes on Validon:

Polaris, what do you think of Validon? Your last assessment of him was "Null leaning scum, but I would like to see more posts with cases that are a bit stronger" from almost 24 hours ago. How has this changed, if at all?

This could be just a question, but it could still discourage a vote on Kilga's supposed second main suspect at that moment.

All in all, the attitude towards Validon lynch isn't genuine.
I can only conclude that Kilga and Validon are scumbuddies, and Kilga is busing him right from the beginning because he knows he won't be a great loss and that'll give him towncred, which will be better for the scum team. However, he still doesn't like losing a team member, so he keeps defending him.

Speaking of which, Validon.
? Okay, I'll leave that for later. This post is already too long, anyways.

##Vote: Kilgamayan <- I've just seen the votecount and PX's vote is still placed but I feel like doing this anyways.
For now. I have even more conviction on him being scum than on Validon, and it wouldn't be fair to vote Validon without writing my case before (u_u)
I actually have a third suspect, but that will have to wait. I'm still doubting, anyways.


I still don't trust the slot but who knows, maybe Mitsuki will actually put in the effort PX failed to. :V

Of course! (?wo)7
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 05:35:59 PM
Seriously, don't hammer. I still have many things to say today.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 06, 2013, 05:37:41 PM
Mmm... Well, I can't imagine this would be a mistake, and this day has slowed down far too much...

...and cut by Kilga.

Man, do you really think there's something more for SB to communicate? There were two posts between his and yours. I feel like his opinion wouldn't have changed in that time, and as close as we are to ending the day I assume he hasn't left anything unsaid.

AGH why did everybody want to post now
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 06, 2013, 05:39:34 PM
Oh.

Never mind, this is probably a bad time to end the day after all. That was some impressive timing...
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 05:51:44 PM
I wanted to wait for Vhaltz to get home and check for mistakes on my post (English is not my mother tongue), but I wasn't going to let anyone hammer before at least posting that, it took ~5 hours to write (@A@)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 05:53:08 PM
Yes, please, more people should suspect me. Maybe then scum will avoid killing me tonight and I'll smash another one of their team members in the face on D3. Whaddaya say, scummies? Are you feeling lucky?

I'm not going to have time to respond properly to that deluge of words until D3 because I'm not getting home until 2.5 hours before the deadline. I will say I find it humorous that replacing the player hasn't changed the playerslot's opinion that Shadowy is town for no reason. Apparently blatant lying is a null tell now? That's news to me.

I just said I wasn't going to hammer, don't shout at me to not hammer. Fearmongering much?

Cheez: SB's gone at the end of the day, so I still want to give him some time for one more post if he wants it, even given how recently he posted.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 06:24:26 PM
Shadoweh is null, not town.
When are you saying that she lied, anyways? I haven't noticed that.

Sooooooosh Kilga, you can reply whenever you want. It's not like you'll get lynched today...
I'm not shouting at anyone, sorry if it gave that impression. Also, I don't even know what to say about the "fearmongering" thing, I didn't even know what it meant until now and it just feels like you're critisizing my personality. But I'd rather not keep talking about this. If you're not scum, show me why you're town, not why I'm a terrible person or something.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 06:47:28 PM
I apologize if my attitude is off-putting, both this game day and the past few days at work have been very frustrating. Shadowy's constant misrepresentation of what's been brought to bear against her and general emotional predatory tendencies have been tiring, and seeing a case I've put a game day-and-a-half of effort into get brushed aside as 'a bunch of null tells' pushed a really big button.

Shadowy's blatant lie is covered in the second bullet point of #581 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040412.html#msg1040412). You'll have to go back over late Day 1 to actually see it in action. I've mentioned several times since then, which makes you saying you didn't see it further disheartening.

As for the hammer comment thing, your "Seriously, don't hammer" right after I said I was going to wait for SB to post at least once more looked like you were trying to paint me as scummy (since it was right on the heels of a large case against me) by accusing me of threateninf to hammer early. This is what I meant by "fearmongering" - it looked like you were trying to make people think I was going to hammer when I said I wasn't. It has nothing to do with player personality.

You claim you think Shadowy's null but you've said you won't vote for her (or NNR), "probably not even to secure a lynch." This is pretty incongruous. Why would you let No Lynch happen instead of securing a lynch on someone you don't have a super-strong town read on?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 06, 2013, 07:23:41 PM
##Unvote
##Vote: Kilgamayan


What blatant lie? Are you talking about that SB thing? Reading the link it seems you are. You know once you pointed them out I told you I hadn't read what he'd said and dropped it right?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 06, 2013, 07:25:15 PM
Also rofl at 'general emotional predatory tendencies'. I AM THE BIG BAD SCARU SHADOWEH. Newsflash that is what I do as town. Stop trying to lynch me for being me.
Not that I expect this to work but I don't think you'll live through tomorrow like this.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 07:28:53 PM
My internet connection isn't working well today (and I'm always being way too paranoid anyways). My intention was telling everyone not to hammer, and I feared that my post would be skipped and someone would hammer, so I had to repeat that (>_<)

I won't vote for Shadoweh because my scumreads are strong this game. But well, that shouldn't be a problem for people who actually want to lynch her...

Anyways, if you mean this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php?action=post;quote=1039168;topic=15788.270;last_msg=1040839) is Shadoweh's lie... I don't really see it. I'm not saying she was right, because she wasn't, but the reasoning doesn't seem like a lie to me, it just seems to be wrong.
... I don't really see why afterwards she says you said she was right, though. She should definitely clarify this, but I don't get why anybody would lie in such an obvious way, it serves no purpose. I think she just misunderstood you.

Shadoweh: Here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039282.html#msg1039282)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 07:58:05 PM
Kilga, I didn't notice that you suspected Shadoweh D1. From what I've seen, the SB kill made you change your opinion on her, and you classified her as neutral in your reads list, changing your opinion afterwards. Ok, I now I see your Shadoweh vote makes sense, ignore the part of my case where I say it doesn't.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 06, 2013, 08:16:46 PM
Mitsuki: That first link brings up the Post Reply page. :V Regardless, the lie in question is in #275, when Shadowy says SB is scummy for "clinging to the DNA wagon when everyone else fled it and won't return." I call it a lie instead of a misinterpretation or just being "wrong" because (a) it would have taken no time at all to see SB hadn't posted since the DNA wagon dissolved, and (b) she claimed in #296 that her comment was justified.

Basically, in really simplified terms, here's what happened.

"SB is scummy for (thing that is easily seen to be factually incorrect)."
"That comment isn't justified because that's not what had happened when you posted."
"It is justified and you agreed it was justified when you pointed out that thing he said after I made the comment in the first place."
"No, I didn't agree with you, and it still didn't happen. (Later: "Also, it still isn't justified by that post I pointed at.")
"I should actually read SB to see if he's voteworthy."

Does that really look like honest townie scumhunting to you? Making an assertion about someone being scummy that's based on a premise that's factually incorrect and then admitting you didn't actually read the person's posts when you get called on it?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Raikaria on November 06, 2013, 08:30:20 PM
Votecount 2.85

Shadoweh (5): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc
NekoNekoRex (1): SB
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
Dormio (1): Cheez8
Kilgamayan (2): Mitsuki, Shadoweh

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

It's 6 to lynch and 8 hours 29 mins remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 08:40:52 PM
What I think is that she didn't pay enough attention so she misinterpreted what happened and then afterwards she realised about her error. It happens to me a lot and I try hard to avoid it, so I can see that happening to someone else who is clearly not motivated.

It just feels like she doesn't care much about the game. I know it's not the proper thing to do, and it's definitely not something that helps town. But it's still something neutral in my opinion.
Not like this matters now, anyways... (=w=u I'm going to focus on finishing my Validon post.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 06, 2013, 08:51:07 PM
Yo, what's up.
I'm going to assume that nobody wants me to hammer right now and work along with that assumption.

I can't really find myself agreeing with Mitsuki's Kilgamayan case.

Also, I'm not the only one that finds this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040849.html#msg1040849) to be hilarious, am I?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 08:55:29 PM
Dormio, did you read me? You'd have noticed that I said not to hammer twice. I still have things to say.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 06, 2013, 08:57:53 PM
I skimmed.
I just got onto the computer and it takes me a while to read things.
ESL, yo.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 09:47:23 PM
Validon

The main reason why I suspect him are associative reads with Kilga, but there's actually more than what I've already pointed out. Do you remember how Kilga kept suspecting him? This is the closest thing to a reply he's done, and it came after Kilga's unvote (a day later, and he had been posting meanwhile)

Okay, listen. I've been looking at everyone's posts and seeing whether or not they could be scummy. I'm doing the fucking best I can, and I'm not going to go "[INSERT NAME HERE] is the scum" when I have my fucking doubts. I have been getting a LOT of nullreads this game, and frankly it's really annoying when people are jumping on me for not being able to find a solid case. The only cases I had were against Serela and SB, but they both ended up town, so what when do I do? I ISO people who are leaning scum.

I don't think anyone realizes this yet: D1 sucks for me. I am NOT someone who just jumps on little tiny details and expect it to reveal scum. No, I look at what's there and try my best to suss out a case from what's there, but I know I will more often than not fail to do so.  I have had a VERY difficult time sussing out any cases this time around, and the ones I DID suss out ended up being wrong in both cases. It also doesn't help that I've been dragged away from the game by school and other IRL shit. So pardon me if my play is subpar. I can only do so much and be here for so long before my head starts hurting and I need to do other things.

I'm tired of looking through posts that don't seem scummy to me. I'm just going to vote for who I currently think is the scummiest, because CLEARLY if I don't then I'M the scum.

If this was a reply to Kilga, I don't see how he didn't say all of this before. I think this is more of a general reply to people who were beginning to suspect him by that time. Only PX voted him, but other players were expressing suspicion towards him just before this post.
(I know I'm not taking into account Polaris here, but he's my third suspect so everything here still applies)

Kilga didn't worry about Validon not replying to his case either, which is something that I'd expect him to do. (Can someone confirm/deny this? I might be relying too much on my intuition with this)

There's also a contradiction there, which I'm quoting again for convenience:

I'm tired of looking through posts that don't seem scummy to me. I'm just going to vote for who I currently think is the scummiest, because CLEARLY if I don't then I'M the scum.

If he didn't see scummy posts how could he think someone was scum? It's also convenient that it's Shadoweh, who was (and still is) the main wagon.

No, you should be trying to lynch scum if they make themselves obvious.

There's also this, which is just a minor thing but I still think it's relevant. Specifying ?if they make themselves obvious? feels like he's saying that he's scum and not being obvious, because that's someting only scum would find relevant enough to point out.
Actually no, that could be Validon not seeing anything scummy to point out. Except for the fact that he was voting Dark and giving reasoning, so I'm leaning towards the first interpretation.

Kilga seems to know what he's doing and he's one of the towniest people here, so...

Why would Validon think that Kilga knows what he's doing if Validon himself is town? He is supposed to be a strong suspect from Kilga's perspective, after all, so at least he'd know Kilga was wrong with this, one of Kilga's main points through the game. Add this to the fact that he plainly ignores Kilga's D2 case on him, as I've explained, and it all only makes sense if they're scumbuddies ? Otherwise Validon would be doing something about the scumreads on him and having different lines of thoughts, but since he relies on his scumbuddy he feels no threat at all coming from Kilga's words.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 06, 2013, 10:23:59 PM
Argh, I have to do homework and stuff and I'm feeling rushed and aaaaaaaaaaaaa. Okay, quick defense against Mitsuki's post on me:

If this was a reply to Kilga, I don't see how he didn't say all of this before.

It was a reply to Polaris, not Kilga. At the moment I had realized that my entire D1 play was really lacking, and I was getting angry at that moment that Polaris was yelling at me for giving ISOs (particularly the fact that I started with CF7, which I only did first because it would be the quickest to do and I wanted to see if there may have been something I missed... which I didn't). So it was mainly me yelling at Polaris, and it just ended up blowing up into general feelings.

Quote
If he didn't see scummy posts how could he think someone was scum? It's also convenient that it's Shadoweh, who was (and still is) the main wagon.

I said that didn't seem scummy. In other words, during D1 I wasn't really sure with my reads. It all seemed really null to me with some wagons leaning more towards scum than others. Polaris at that moment was yelling at me for not placing a vote, so I finally just did in response. I placed it on Shadoweh because out of all of the reads I had that leaned scum, my read on her was strongest.

Quote
There's also this, which is just a minor thing but I still think it's relevant. Specifying ?if they make themselves obvious? feels like he's saying that he's scum and not being obvious, because that's someting only scum would find relevant enough to point out.
Actually no, that could be Validon not seeing anything scummy to point out. Except for the fact that he was voting Dark and giving reasoning, so I'm leaning towards the first interpretation.

That was me arguing against Dark's "I lynch nulls" policy thing he talked about. What I was trying to say with that was "you should be lynching the people who seem scummiest." The way he phrased his thoughts made me think he was saying "LYNCH NULLREADS," and I was arguing against that. The "make themselves obvious" part should be read "if they look really scummy."

Quote
Why would Validon think that Kilga knows what he's doing if Validon himself is town? He is supposed to be a strong suspect from Kilga's perspective, after all, so at least he'd know Kilga was wrong with this, one of Kilga's main points through the game. Add this to the fact that he plainly ignores Kilga's D2 case on him, as I've explained, and it all only makes sense if they're scumbuddies ? Otherwise Validon would be doing something about the scumreads on him and having different lines of thoughts, but since he relies on his scumbuddy he feels no threat at all coming from Kilga's words.

I've been ignoring the scumreads from him because other people are more of an issue at the moment. In other words, I didn't feel like I needed to argue with Kilga about the scumread on me at that moment because I figured that it would be more important to talk about if I start becoming the main wagon. Granted, I probably should have addressed it, but I was more focused on looking at other people.
And the "Kilga knows what he is doing" part comes from the fact that I know Kilga is good at mafia and I was getting a townread on him based on his other cases. He supported them well and I didn't see anything really scummy from them.

In short, I don't get exactly why you're associating me with Kilga, because frankly I find him more towny than anyone else at the moment. >_>;
Also quick defense was more drawn out than I thought. Need to do homework and stuff, will be back later to follow-up if necessary.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 06, 2013, 10:43:56 PM
##unvote

So I can read the thread without the threat of hammer. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 06, 2013, 11:04:39 PM
In light of Mitsuki's posts, I am re-ISOing Shadoweh.  I'd like it if Mitsuki could ISO Shadoweh, also.  I am posting again with my results in about thirty minutes, I think. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 06, 2013, 11:11:01 PM
I've been ignoring the scumreads from him because other people are more of an issue at the moment. In other words, I didn't feel like I needed to argue with Kilga about the scumread on me at that moment because I figured that it would be more important to talk about if I start becoming the main wagon. Granted, I probably should have addressed it, but I was more focused on looking at other people.
And the "Kilga knows what he is doing" part comes from the fact that I know Kilga is good at mafia and I was getting a townread on him based on his other cases. He supported them well and I didn't see anything really scummy from them.

In short, I don't get exactly why you're associating me with Kilga, because frankly I find him more towny than anyone else at the moment. >_>;
Also quick defense was more drawn out than I thought. Need to do homework and stuff, will be back later to follow-up if necessary.
The finding him townie when everyone else is getting scum vibes from him is a good start. How did he support his cases well anyways? I think he's just putting more effort into his cases. Which well.. he kind of writes huge walls as scum too.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 11:28:00 PM
I've been ignoring the scumreads from him because other people are more of an issue at the moment. In other words, I didn't feel like I needed to argue with Kilga about the scumread on me at that moment because I figured that it would be more important to talk about if I start becoming the main wagon. Granted, I probably should have addressed it, but I was more focused on looking at other people.

Why did you reply to Polaris one day later when you didn't feel the need to reply to him before?
Also, you were the main wagon back then, even if it was just the start of D2, so your reply is invalid. And by the way, not replying even if Kilga isn't your scumbuddy is scummy; scum wouldn't want to reply to avoid attracting attention, which seems to have worked perfectly on you.

I said that didn't seem scummy. In other words, during D1 I wasn't really sure with my reads. It all seemed really null to me with some wagons leaning more towards scum than others. Polaris at that moment was yelling at me for not placing a vote, so I finally just did in response. I placed it on Shadoweh because out of all of the reads I had that leaned scum, my read on her was strongest.

How can you have a scumread on someone whose posts don't seem scummy to you?


I'd try to write my case on Polaris but I'm too tired (it's late here) and I have a huge cold. Oh well, I guess it can wait.

Sky Paladin: Uuuuuuuuuuuugh, okay...
This ISO was really quick. I still see noting scummy, just things that could be interpreted as townie or scummy but that when I think about it I realise that those are still null and tell me nothing about her alignment.
In the unlikely event that someone wants to lynch Validon please tell me now, I won't be here for the deadline and I'll leave soon.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 06, 2013, 11:35:30 PM
Okay, Mitsuki.  Those are some pretty epic posts right there.  I've gone through and re-ISO'd Shadoweh.  A lot of people asked why I was voting for them, but I didn't post about it because I thought the case was clear and me posting more would just make it more confusing.  But you raised some good points so now I have to question my own reasoning, too.  I guess I'd like you to ISO Shadoweh to the same degree you have Kilga and Validon.  I know you said that you have a null read on Shadoweh, however you also said you didn't read in great detail (or something like that) so I feel like you suspected Kilg/Validon and just focused on them.  That's my suspicion.  That said, having a new player enter the field does have the big bonus of they are likely to pick up questionable details that everybody has just assumed is the truth. 

My position on Shadoweh started day 1 http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038954.html#msg1038954 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038954.html#msg1038954).  (On a related note, could somebody please show me how to make it so I can hide the link behind a word like 'here'). 

Quote
And if I thought CF7 was worse, Shadoweh is just horrible.  They have also posted zero content posts, and largely made no effort to even defend themselves.  This is such a massive difference from their previous game.  It's a big red flag for me.

I feel like this trend continued.  Shadoweh didn't appear to be scum hunting.  At the time, I voted SB for the same general reason, although I tipped SB over Shadoweh because I felt SB's coaching to be malicious and harmful.  Unfortunately, it turned out to be genuine and supportive.  Oh well. 

Shadoweh then voted for CF7 http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039083.html#msg1039083 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039083.html#msg1039083) for no specific reason other than to 'not vote for Serela'.  To be clear, it wasn't a scumhunt - it was lynch somebody who wasn't posting. 
Quote
I'm gonna throw down a vote down and see if people want to change their minds considering I don't want to vote any of the major wagons AS USUAL


The reason I finally voted Shadoweh was in this post:  http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039373.html#msg1039373

At that time, I voted Serela because of meta "better to lynch than no lynch on d1".  However I had picked SB because I thought at that time they were voting for CF7, not Darkie.  Kilga pointed out my mistake. 
So my argument should read:

"What he is doing is voting for CF7, at this stage a fairly useless vote. However, CF7 is not doing anything.
CF7 is one of my scum picks. Shadoweh is one of my scum picks. Why would scum vote for scum -> when there is no danger.
What's the danger in day1? For scum, it's 1- town lunches a scum, and 2, town lynches not-scum.
Scum want to make non contributing votes on day 1 that appear contributing.
The easiest way to do that is to vote for an afk - town may switch to afk CF7 and pop! Shadoweh will have helped lynch scum, therefore appearing town.

Why not help lynch Serela? Because scums want the lynch to fail today regardless if it's town or scum."

However, I didn't state that clearly in my post where I voted for Shadoweh.  I guess that's why people were confused about my reasoning.  I voted for Shadoweh because;
1:  I thought the vote on CF7 was a ploy to escape suspicion, and
2: They didn't actually do any scumhunting up until this point, and finally
3: I felt that she was playing in a significantly different style than to her previous game.  In particular, Shadoweh was posting a lot less, and not bossing people around.  Shadoweh did a lot of work in the previous game.  In this one she just appears to be coasting. 

I voted for Shadoweh TODAY because she was part of my day1 scumhunting picks and I wanted to see how the day panned out.  I had started to look at Dark and Validon because I thought, "What if it really was just as straightforward as this:  SB was killed because scum were worried he was too close."  Then Shadoweh had a pretty bad fumble (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039972.html#msg1039972).  SB's death and the reason we knew it wasn't a vighit (he could vote) were key points of the discussion up until that point.  It should have been relevant!  How did Shadoweh miss it?  Then when Cheez8 pointed it out (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039983.html#msg1039983) Shadoweh was best friends for ever with Cheez8.  I feel like towny's would have been paying more attention to these details and not missed it in the first place, basically. 

Also in that same post, Shadoweh then votes for the afk slot - NekoNekoRex/CF7.  NNR then had this to say about me (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040326.html#msg1040326) and I was just incredulous that anybody could have been suspecting me over Shadoweh at this stage.  I thought the most obvious answer was that NNR was trying to save Shadoweh, probably because they were scumbuddies.  This was largely because NNR straight up focused on me without any consideration of Shadoweh.  That's the reason I asked Mitsuki to ISO Shadoweh also.  I want both sides of the argument considered.  But I don't consider Mitsuki as automatically scum because unlike NNR, she used good reasoning and showed a lot of effort and consideration went in to her post.  NNR just copy pasted things out of context and made stuff up.  So it looks bad for them, and by association, Shadoweh. 

At this point there was a solid d2 wagon going on Shadoweh and their only contribution was to say "Sky did you just accuse Neko, the slot I've been suggesting we lynch every day, of being my scum partner?" with no rebuttal except for a handwave 'people need to stop associating before players are flipped'.  How about an argument to defend yourself or even helping us narrow down other targets, if you aren't scum. 

Then finally there was this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040718.html#msg1040718) which sounds like giving up.  But where's the fight?  I didn't see...ANYTHING...from Shadoweh the whole time.  There's not a single scumhunting post or even an effort at defense.  I'm really shocked by it. 

And that catches us up with today.  Please have a look at these points, Mitsuki, and see if it changes your opinions at all. 

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 06, 2013, 11:48:59 PM
... I'm very sorry, but I can't really make the effort to answer to all of that now. It's almost 1am, I have to wake up early tomorrow and I need to rest so that my cold gets better (TwT)
I'll try to make up for this D3.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 06, 2013, 11:49:40 PM
I don't think Mitsuki should bother because I'm obviously getting lynched here and opinions on the people still alive are more useful. Trying to understand me never works, I'm a renegade.

Your case is pretty amazing Sky P. I was not pushing for a no-lynch on Day 1. In case of emergency we will all push through lynches, so saying I was voting CF7 because I didn't want anyone to get lynched is wow. Maybe Neko suspects you over me because I'm not scum and he's known me long enough to watch me go through effort phase. I'm just not in the mood to fight the inevitable today. Do you think it's scummy for someone to not care if they're lynched? Scum want to survive you know.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 06, 2013, 11:58:31 PM
Shadoweh, I can also consider I am wrong. 

If you were a towny (and you did claim vanilla town, iirc), who are your scumpicks?  Throw me a bone here :/
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 12:02:00 AM
If I knew who the scum were I'd be making cases on them.
At the moment I'm alright with the Kilgamayan/Validon assumption. I would never lynch Polaris or Mitsuki, I'm not sure how I feel about the DNA/Cheez/Sky P triumverant of weird posting styles, and Dormio is nonexistant. I supose it could be NNR, but it's likely one of you three.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Raikaria on November 07, 2013, 12:05:05 AM
Votecount 2.9

Shadoweh (4): Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc
NekoNekoRex (1): SB
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
Dormio (1): Cheez8
Kilgamayan (2): Mitsuki, Shadoweh

Not Voting (2): Kilgamayan, Sky_Paladin

It's 6 to lynch and Just under 5 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 12:08:16 AM
Was too lazy to post yesterday and now I'm facing the repercussions with my GARGANTUAN WORD COUNT LOOMING OVER ME AAAH D:

but like mitsuki are you scum? :o

because like I seriously don't know how you can just waltz in with scumreads the two people generally accepted as town (kilga and me, sorry for being a pretentious) while simultaneously refusing to consider any of the existing wagons, and adamantly at that. your credibility is decreased because it seems like you haven't really looked at the game properly, which makes me wonder if you're even serious about these cases or if you just made them up because you're trying to look SO HIP and PRO TOWN by challenging a widely held belief.

^ basically my first impressions of mitsuki. not a fan of nitpicky quotestrippy cases either `_`
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 12:12:06 AM
By the way, Sky Paladin, what exactly was your reason for rereading Shadoweh again? (and making the huge post on Shadoweh)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 07, 2013, 12:12:36 AM
Okay, I'm going to be on and off for the next several hours because I'm going to have to cook dinner, do chores, finally do some RPing with a group of online buddies that I haven't been able to do in a while and I need to be there for, etc., but I will be here for the deadline. So if I don't say something for a while, don't worry, I'll address any questions you might have of me before the deadline, just don't expect immediate responses because this game doesn't take up all of my focus and energy.

@Sky_Paladin: *sheds tears at how comprehensive your case is*
That is as far as I can tell the entirety of why Shadoweh has a wagon on her right now, and pretty much EVERYONE on the wagon has used at least some of these reasons somewhere as their reasons for voting her. I honestly can't fathom why Mitsuki isn't looking at this, but her opinion is her opinion.

The finding him townie when everyone else is getting scum vibes from him is a good start. How did he support his cases well anyways? I think he's just putting more effort into his cases. Which well.. he kind of writes huge walls as scum too.

I'm... not sure how to respond to this, because the first sentence confuses me. Are you talking to me first of all, and second of all what do you mean by "a good start"?
As for the effort thing, well, that's mainly why I currently have a townread on him. I mean, I guess it could be more null, but I've just been seeing it more as town.

@Mitsuki:

Quote
Why did you reply to Polaris one day later when you didn't feel the need to reply to him before?
Also, you were the main wagon back then, even if it was just the start of D2, so your reply is invalid. And by the way, not replying even if Kilga isn't your scumbuddy is scummy; scum wouldn't want to reply to avoid attracting attention, which seems to have worked perfectly on you.

Because I was too busy with IRL and other stuff at the time and I wasn't as focused on the game, so I glanced over stuff at points and then tried to revisit it later when I had time, and I focused more on trying to find scum rather than defend myself, because I thought finding scum was a priority over my own defense. Again, I spend time doing other things than focus on this game, and during D1 I wasn't as invested in this game as I was with other things.
Now, of course, if Kilga wants to say anything about me now, go ahead, I'll respond this time because I actually am prioritizing defending myself unlike before, when I was more worried about scumhunting.

Quote
How can you have a scumread on someone whose posts don't seem scummy to you?

Okay, let me explain more about what I originally said. This is the sentence you find a problem with:

Quote
I'm tired of looking through posts that don't seem scummy to me.

This is what I meant by that: I was ISOing a few people. There were a lot of posts that didn't seem scummy when I was looking through them. I did not mean that every single one of those posts didn't seem scummy to me. If you looked at my actual ISOs, I pointed out things that I thought were either weird or seemed scummy. Of course I found some things that I thought implyed scum, but I was hesitant to vote based off of them alone. When Polaris yelled at me about just going ahead and voting, I finally did because I was angry that me not having yet decided to vote someone for sure was being taken as scummy, because apparently if you're not pushing someone, you're scum, and that really set me off because I was reading and I wasn't sure who I should push.

@Cut by like six posts: @Polaris: I know, right? I see you and Kilga both as town, and reading her post on Kilga just kind of made me go "wait what." It's mostly all using the idea that he alternated between pushing on me and not... which makes sense because he was pushing other wagons at the time. It's not like he abandoned the thought that I was scum or anything. Worse, she's using that as an associative read on me. I mean, what?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 12:12:56 AM
Replacements tend to waltz in and have different opinions from the people in the game. Which is a good thing because they're not brainwashed. The only reason you're considered a town read imo is because you're the other BEST PAL and it was stupid of us to lynch one of you in the first place.

Also more then a few people have mentioned gut feelings of scum Kilga so you're wrong about that one.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 12:17:20 AM
ASSOCIATIVE READS ARE THE WORST THINGS WHY WOULD ANYONE USE THEM GOD
BY THE WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM WITH NEKO, SERELA, AND PROBABLY SOMEONE ELSE I THINK IS SCUM TOO
IM TOWNIE OBVTOWN YEAH!!!!!!!!

Validon: You finding Kilga super townie is the part that makes you linked to him, yes. Why the hell are you prioritizing defending yourself, aren't you about to lynch a scumbag and get ~*~Super Cred~*~? What are you worried about? :D Kilga can put in effort as scum. If you can't tell me something you read him say that sounds townie there's something wrong with your assumptions.

@Cut by like six posts: @Polaris: I know, right? I see you and Kilga both as town, and reading her post on Kilga just kind of made me go "wait what." It's mostly all using the idea that he alternated between pushing on me and not... which makes sense because he was pushing other wagons at the time. It's not like he abandoned the thought that I was scum or anything. Worse, she's using that as an associative read on me. I mean, what?
OH MAN HOW DARE SHE NOT BE PART OF THE HIVE MIND
LET'S LYNCH THE WEIRDO BEFORE SHE BECOMES CONTAGIOUS
ONE OF US
ONE OF US

If you guys don't lynch Kilga and Validon together after today I will be crying tears of rage.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 12:21:35 AM
It's ok that Mitsuki has unique and interesting opinions but I'm unhappy with her staunch refusal to care about anyone else, which seems unnecessarily stubborn and could border on tunneling. And her cases do give off the impression of tunnel vision and confirmation bias, seeing as her cases are really quotestrippy and it looks like she was selectively reading all the "bad" parts to make a case without looking at a coherent whole, and when it looks like she hasn't read the game properly, it makes it worse. It's how she handled her opinions that are worse than her actual opinions, more than anything.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 12:28:30 AM
Honestly that just sounds like you don't like the quote-strip posting style. You don't try to make people sound good when you're making a case on them, you know, you just point out the parts you thought were scummy.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 12:32:20 AM
If that were really the case then tunnel vision and confirmation bias wouldn't be things that happen. Why are you defending Mitsuki anyway >_> because she's your lord and savior?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 12:34:03 AM
and Sky Paladin why you ignore my question ;_;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 07, 2013, 12:40:43 AM
What I think is that she didn't pay enough attention so she misinterpreted what happened and then afterwards she realised about her error. It happens to me a lot and I try hard to avoid it, so I can see that happening to someone else who is clearly not motivated.

I pointed out that what she claimed wasn't true and she effectively went "yes it is". Even if you screw up once, when that screw-up is pointed out, why on earth would a townie not go back and double-check before reasserting what they said?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 12:50:12 AM
Because she's town just like PX was. I don't want you to undermine her when people should be listening and lynching along her lines.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 12:56:21 AM
Well I have to undermine her because her cases are dumb. You're just latching on to her because it's convenient for you >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 07, 2013, 12:58:55 AM
Hey there Polaris :D  I didn't ignore your question, I was just afk for 40 minutes. 

I unvoted to buy time for this conversation.  I am around for another 3 hours so it's no problem for me. 

The reason I liked Mitsuki over NNR is as stated:  When NNR came in to defend Shadoweh, he did it by directly attacking me, without substantiating a defense on Shadoweh, but using bad arguments.  This looks like a scum tell.  Mitsuki picked Kilga and Validon but she didn't use bad arguments.  A lot of what she has read comes off as feelings rather than specifics, however, I have to admit that feelings often influence me to look for reasons in the first place.  I don't think her posts are bad.  So I don't see it as a scum read.  Town can make mistakes when they target people for entirely good reasons.  This doesn't set off an alarm for me.  Mistakes for bad reasons is the red alert! 

So when I asked Mitsuki, please re-ISO Shadoweh, I thought to myself:  Why isn't Misuki targetting Shadoweh?  I realised the case wasn't clear because it was spread over about 14 pages.  I decided to re-ISO so that Mitsuki could consider Shadoweh in the context of the Kilga/Validon situation.  I thought that it wasn't fair if I asked her to ISO Shadoweh if I didn't at least do this myself.  Perhaps we would come to the same, or different, conclusions. 

Lastly, I hoped that by posting it, I would be cleared of suspicion.  Some people have said 'Why is Sky pushing Shadoweh?' because I didn't give a clear case before.  I thought that if I did this, it would also give Shadoweh a good opportunity to deliver a solid rebuttal.  However at this time, such a defence is not forthcoming. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 01:03:56 AM
All right. That makes me think you're not as scummy as I thought you were `_` I don't scum would take on that sort of initiative, at least.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Raikaria on November 07, 2013, 01:26:33 AM
THREE HOURS 33 MINS REMAINING
Countdown (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 01:27:54 AM
Oh just shut up and lynch me already so you can move on to the part where you're wrong.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 01:29:44 AM
but i need all 3 hours and 33 minutes to loser my wordcount ;_;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 01:32:58 AM
lower* whoops
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 07, 2013, 01:36:47 AM
My only concern is if:  What is Shadoweh is town?  Well, I think it's too late in the day for any what-if scenarios. 

I don't know how I feel about 'who is next'.  I guess it depends on how Shadoweh comes out.  I hope she's scum.  Otherwise I've got no leads :/ 

Going into the night phase with an empty feeling.  Fingers crossed. 

##Vote Shadoweh
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 01:40:14 AM
wordcount-kun is totally a loser, though, so the typo doesn't really matter `_`

i tried reading some of kilga's old games just to entertain the notion that he could be scum but it hasn't gotten me anywhere (if only because kilga's only scum games are anonygames which are a pain through sift through now)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Raikaria on November 07, 2013, 01:43:39 AM
Votecount 2.85 REDUX

Shadoweh (5): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc
NekoNekoRex (1): SB
Sky_Paladin (1): Dormio
Dormio (1): Cheez8
Kilgamayan (2): Mitsuki, Shadoweh

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

It's 6 to lynch and 3 hours 16 mins remaining.
Shadoweh is at L-1
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131107T07&p0=110&msg=Day+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 07, 2013, 01:47:00 AM
Why is there like two more pages of content suddenly?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: DNAbc on November 07, 2013, 01:48:25 AM
Basically I want to type something out. Sorry but I basically had to leave the comp for an entire half day.

I now have doubts of shadowy wagon now that Mitsuki pointed out what's wrong and I really want time to think, but its 3 hours until then I can actually access the comp.
I dont think its likely I will be locking down any scum if I voteswitch now, not that I have the time to push for kilga.

Mitsuki reinforced my originally shaky scumread on kilga and I am now worshipping her. \o/


My mental state of this game is just in a divine mess right now. Hello polaris, hello dormio, where have you both been after all this lurk? Actually coming out of your shell because your beloved kilgascum is being pushed on hard?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 01:52:18 AM
i should ask the same question to you. your last post was 20 hours ago! why the heck were you lurking????

i hope you can see how absolutely idiotic this question is now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 07, 2013, 01:54:35 AM
I can't tell if I'm coming down with something or if today was a terrible day in all regards but I'm having a lot of trouble making out the specifics of any of these posts I'm reading. My brain's just not around anymore right now. That said, I guess I might as well vote to hurry up and end the day.

##Unvote
##Vote: Kilgamayan


I doubt I'll post any more today. There's snow outside and it's way too warm right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 01:58:57 AM
Because some people said some words Dormio. Are you gonna hammer me bro?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 01:59:13 AM
i seriously hope you guys aren't going to quickwagon kilga right now because i am going to be so annoyed. this happened once last game and look where that got everyone >_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Validon98 on November 07, 2013, 02:00:17 AM
I'm really not sure what else to say at this point myself. Nothing has changed my mind about Shadoweh, really, and I'm going to be watching a stream soon anyways, so I'm not really up for anymore discussion. D3, though, I'll address anything that comes up between now and when I get back on.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 02:01:29 AM
i seriously hope you guys aren't going to quickwagon kilga right now because i am going to be so annoyed. this happened once last game and look where that got everyone >_>
We could quickwagon Validon instead if you want, he just said he's going afk!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 07, 2013, 02:02:02 AM
shadoweh don't be a weenie
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 07, 2013, 02:08:56 AM
Since it looks as though everyone's pretty much done for the day I guess I'll just hammer and read whatever happened during the night phase or something I guess.
##Unvote
##Vote Shadoweh
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 02:11:47 AM
<_<

Seriously? I know a thing or two about terrible hammers and that one is pretty high up on the list.
Bye everyone! Remember to murder Kilga and Validon for me! ^_^/
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Shadoweh on November 07, 2013, 02:13:57 AM
PS if anyone wants to lynch Dormio for not reading and just pulling that that'd be cool too. It's not day 5 yet though so i won't hold my breath.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 07, 2013, 02:21:19 AM
Well I mean from what I gleaned it didn't really look like you were the topic of discussion, rather something along the lines of "let's lynch Kilga".
And I don't want to lynch Kilga so it's like all whatever.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 07, 2013, 02:24:22 AM
It figures there would be a flurry of activity that ends right before I'm actually able to get home.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 07, 2013, 03:03:54 AM
Quote
he reason I liked Mitsuki over NNR is as stated:  When NNR came in to defend Shadoweh, he did it by directly attacking me, without substantiating a defense on Shadoweh, but using bad arguments.  This looks like a scum tell. 
I think you missed the part where I had literally not read anyone but you up until that point. Saying I "defended" Shadoweh is like saying that I had a townread on PX up until he posted on D2.

Do remember I didn't read D1 either.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 07, 2013, 04:17:44 AM
Anyway the people who are "suddenly doubting" the Shadoweh wagon after we're already lynching her are kinda dumb. She basically hasn't done anything all day, choosing to spend nearly the entire time parking her vote on me and whining about how scummy she isn't, and then jumped onto the buddy train with the one person who didn't think she was obvscum.

I don't like Mitsuki either today, and I think I'll have plenty to choose from to vote for tomorrow based on the recent posts.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: BT on November 07, 2013, 04:43:43 AM
Votecount 2.9 - HAMMER

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

~

Shadoweh was SLOWLY and PAINFULLY lynched. She was:

Quote
Welcome to Justice Juice Mafia, Shadoweh! You're Gluttonous Guava. Your digestive abilities are unparalleled as you can swallow pretty much anything without feeling any of it down the road. Tastiest of them all are explosives and weaponry - has the added bonus of disarming baddies, which is a nice afterthought.

Your role is Vanilla Town. You're dealing with the big guns, which means there are no guns to be found here. The best you can do is support your teammates vocally.

You win when all evildoers are eliminated.

It is now Night 2. Deadline is in 24 hours.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131108T07&p0=110&msg=Night+2)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (NIGHT 2)
Post by: BT on November 07, 2013, 05:29:14 AM
Quote from: bars
Dormio - 671
Darkninjaabc - 667
Polaris - 655
Cheez8 - 627
NNR - 619
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (NIGHT 2)
Post by: BT on November 08, 2013, 12:44:46 AM
EARLY UPDATE EARLY UPDATE EARLY UPDATE

You wake up and it's the middle of the night n' shit. Not long till dawn, though. You wait it out for a few hours and look around in broad daylight to find out that no one was plucked during the night.

Votecount 3.1

Not Voting: (9 ) Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, NekoNekoRex, Cheez8, Validon98, Dormio, Mitsuki, Kilgamayan, Polaris

Day 3 lasts 76 hours and requires a majority of 5 votes to lynch.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 01:18:21 AM
Mitsuki and Kilgamayan are the same alignment. I'm inclined to believe this means they are both town.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 01:21:22 AM
Ok good to know. I was thinking that even though I was being critical of Mitsuki (perhaps overly so), I don't think she's exactly scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 2)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 01:23:28 AM
Shadoweh was SLOWLY and PAINFULLY lynched.

and how true this was `_`

Not going to force you to claim, NNR, but did you get any useful info from N1?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 01:24:17 AM
^ don't need to answer that if you don't want to but seeing as you've tantalized us with something already I can't help but ask ;_;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 01:28:29 AM
That info was the culmination of two nights of using my role
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 01:32:51 AM
Ok I think I understand what kind of role it is now /me TOTALLY INCONSPICUOUS WINK

ANYWAY.

I'm kind of relying on process of elimination now and am down to 6 people, but like I had townreads on four of them so I have to reconsider EVERYTHING

From what I remember:

Darkninja was pretty useless D2 and apparently thought Kilga was scum and yet still decided to trust him and lynch Shadoweh ??? what's up with that

Validon finally got angry at me poking him and did things which I thought could have been townish but I guess scum could get angry at themselves too for being so easily targeted so this could be a null tell over anything.

Dormio was pretty unremarkable and there was that really bad hammer but since whoever hammered was doing us a favor anyway it's kind of a nulltell

I got the impression Sky Paladin was town yesterday so MAYBE NOT HIM and same with Cheez BUT I DON'T KNOW MAYBE I'LL HAVE TO READ THEM AGAIN???
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 01:33:48 AM
I said 6 people but I meant 5 :derp:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 01:37:53 AM
Anyway since I don't have a reason to further suspect Mitsuki or Kilga, that leaves SP as my primary scumguess for the time being.

##Vote: Sky Paladin
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 01:48:51 AM
Scumteam at this point is three of Sky, Dark, Cheez, and Polaris, as far as my reads go, due to PoE. Kilga and Mitsuki aren't off the table, but the way Mitsuki jumped in the game to attack Kilga off the bat leads me to think they aren't in cahoots.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 01:58:56 AM
##Vote Cheez8

Mostly a gut feeling for now, still reading. For now, Cheez, what was your motivation for switching to Kilga at the end of the day?

sadface at nnr for not eliminating me from his list :<
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 03:58:56 AM
I'm pretty shocked that Shadoweh turned out to be town.  It meant the whole time I was on a wild goose chase.  I'm sorry, Shadoweh.  It was an honest mistake. 

I'm more shocked nobody died last night.  I assume there's a doc or a saboteur with a very interesting story to tell today. 

Taken at face value, what NNR has to say...would clear him, Mitsuki, and Kilga. 

That leaves only six players so good odds for lynching one today, right? 

I don't know what to think right now.  I was so sure about Shadoweh.  I'll be around for another hour but then I have work. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 04:09:29 AM
Alright. 

Out of the last six, I know I am town.  So that leaves five. 

If we also assume Polaris is town, that leaves four. 

2. Darkninjaabc
6. Cheez8
7. Validon98
8. Dormio

Here are the results from bars. 

Dormio - 671
Darkninjaabc - 667
Polaris - 655
Cheez8 - 627

If we take out the only person who is not in both lists, you get left with:

Dormio - 671
Darkninjaabc - 667
Cheez8 - 627

I've made a lot of big assumptions and arbitrarily decided that posting less = more likely to be scum.  I don't think it'll hold water.  For now it'll just be something for me to mull over while I'm on the bus. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 04:11:27 AM
Nevermind.  I totally missed Validon. 

Sigh.  I'm just gonna shut up for now. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 04:34:09 AM
Oh hey, cool. Early start today. Better yet, we all continue to live. Yay!
If Kilga and Mitsuki are the same alignment I'm left in a very confused state because my thoughts on Kilga were wildly wavering but leaning towards scum and my thoughts on Mitsuki were barely formed but leaning towards town. I'm probably going to conclude absolutely nothing on this front, ever.

I know it would be super-bad for doc to put themselves in danger but it would also be pretty cool to learn the identity of two townies. I'll let the doc gauge the risks and decide for themselves though. Actually, would the person who was attacked and saved have noticed it? I'm not familiar with whether or not it works that way around here.

Scumteam at this point is three of Sky, Dark, Cheez, and Polaris, as far as my reads go, due to PoE. Kilga and Mitsuki aren't off the table, but the way Mitsuki jumped in the game to attack Kilga off the bat leads me to think they aren't in cahoots.
...Darkie being scum is a possibility I will acknowledge, but refuse to act on unless absolutely necessary (for now.) Polaris being scum is a possibility I'm pretty hesitant to assume as well.

##Vote Cheez8

Mostly a gut feeling for now, still reading. For now, Cheez, what was your motivation for switching to Kilga at the end of the day?

sadface at nnr for not eliminating me from his list :<
My motivation for switching to Kilga was pretty shallow. Basically, I suspected him more than I suspected Shadoweh. Since lynching Kilga suddenly started to appear as a faint possibility, I decided I wanted to help lynch him more than I wanted to help lynch Shadoweh.

I admit I was seconds away from hammering Shadoweh earlier in the day, but that was when Shadoweh appeared to be the only potential lynch other than maaaaayyyybe NNR, but I don't suspect him that much.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 05:01:49 AM
I'm going back and forth on NNR's declaration because I think a Mitsuki/NNR/??? scum team could guess I'd come out guns blazing against Mitsuki today (which I admit I was planning on doing) and perhaps decided to pull this stunt to get me to look elsewhere? This is based on a lot of role speculation, though, and probably a degree of paranoia on top of that. There's also a lingering degree of massive irritation at the idea that all of Shadowy, Mitsuki, and NNR could be town, particularly given I think Dormio is likelier to be town than scum with that hammer.

I also didn't get a chance to do the rereading or case-response-writing I wanted to do overnight, since the day opened 4 hours earlier than I expected and zapped almost all of the free time I had to actually do those things.

So let us try this.

##Vote: Cheez8

In taking a look back through D2, a lot of his time seemed spend just kind of bantering about stuff that was technically game-relevant but not actually scum-hunting. I remembered throughout the day that he existed because he posted a fair amount, but looking in-depth at the posts shows a lack of scumhunting substance. This also inspired me to go back and look through his voting history, and boy is this bad. Here's the Day 1 evolution of his Dormio suspicions in quote form, as gathered in chronological order of all the posts I could find with meaningful mention of Dormio in them:

Dormio: It's still something small and I get how I could be wrong here, but bringing up a point against Serela for not having forming an opinion at a time when there generally weren't good opinions to form is a bit iffy to me. Mostly because I was basically in the same boat at that point, and seeing someone called out for that made me indignant or something.

Dormio- I still suspect him.

Wow, these sort of Day Ones are more interesting than I thought. Harder, too. I've gone back through the thread a couple times and there's not much I can conclude. All of Kilga's posts, most of SB's posts and some of Darkie's posts make me think "scum", and several of Serela's posts and Darkie's posts make me think "town". That's more or less the limit to what I can gather, at least without a little bit more information. I don't really think I was right in suspecting Dormio anymore, and Paladin is still hard to read but I'm more inclined to see him as town right now. Shadoweh isn't contributing nearly as much as others are (probably less than Validon, though without as many words to show for it) and that has me a little worried.

I have no idea when I'm going to stop going back and forth on everybody in the entire game like this, but I know that at least SOME of these opinions are worth mentioning.

I guess I'll just be vaguely suspicious of Kilga for the time being. Kind of glad to see Darkie's not voting for a null read anymore.

(Important to note: There is no mention of Dormio between the above post and the below post)

Okay so quickly reading through what I missed, both Dormio and Serela seem like people I wouldn't really have an issue with lynching now.

I wonder what it says when there are two people arguing against each other and I feel like I could lynch both of them. Probably just that I'm not too good at this.

Dormio: I went through an ISO on him earlier and things didn't really look good. I would have no problems following a Dormio wagon if one got off the ground.

...

There you go. I'd happily vote for Kilga, Dormio or Shadoweh in order to end the day, or maybe even one of the four I ruled out if a wagon somehow suddenly forms for one of them, but people are gonna have to start agreeing first. And CF7, SB... get those votes off Darkie already.

Actually, you know what, I'll help spur things along here.
##Vote: Dormio

Oh whatever, I'll hope against hope and leave my vote there for the time being, but if Shadoweh's wagon picks up steam or if we really aren't going to get a lynch any other way I'll switch my vote over to her or Serela.

(For context, this is said after another respoonse to Polaris asking Cheez about the viability of a Dormio wagon)

So Serela's posted enough for

##Unvote
and probably just about enough for a Serela vote soon if he keeps misrepresenting Dormio's posts like this.

(This doesn't actually mention Dormio - though he does say a couple of things to Dormio earlier in the post - but it's where the vote is dropped, so I thought it should be included. Cheez also does not mention or interact with Dormio at any point for the rest of the game day.)

So, to summarize, Cheez had some initial suspicion of Dormio for a fairly ED1 thing. No big deal, ED1's hard for everyone. He eventually drops it (third quote). Then then, right after that, Dormio is suddenly suspicious again, for...well, no apparent reason, really. Certainly no reason is given! It can't be the first reason, that got expressly dropped and it wasn't brought up again. Whatever these mysterious unstated reasons are, they're apparently enough to warrant a vote for Dormio, which he then clings to when it is pointed out that a Dormio wagon is unlikely. Hoping for something to magically happen to Dormio, instead of, y'know, actually pushing the Dormio case. No attempt whatsoever is put into support the vote or encouraging people to look at Dormio as a viable lynch candidate. I think I've already established in this game where I stand on votes like this!

And then there's his first post of Day 2:

Honestly Dormio still sticks out to me as one of the biggest offenders out of the Serela votes (and town in general but especially in light of Serela's flip.) Maybe Validon or PX too but it's not like either of them have really posted enough so far.

I'm also secretly hoping Darkie says something incriminating beyond a doubt because he really does not inspire confidence as a townie. It'd be really convenient for him to slip up but sadly he can only really slip up and prove he's scum if he's scum and that's kind of a long shot.

This bothers me on two levels - Dormio is suddenly a viable candidate again after being dropped without comment the previous day, and the use of "still", which implies it's a continuation of the case that was never actually substantiated and eventually dropped without comment.

After this is when we get the whole bunch of posts that don't contain any real scumhunting (unless you want to count #526 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040090.html#msg1040090), which I don't really, since it's based on a somewhat sketchy litmus test, isn't pushed with a vote, and is dropped about an hour later). The function they seem to serve the most is to remind people that Cheez exists. They're very "I'm helping! :D" posts. I'm not linking them or commenting on any individually because I don't think there's any real need to - you can use the link in the quote from his first D2 post and just start reading his posts from there, it's pretty self-evident.

His Dormio vote finally comes in over 36 hours after the day begins in #599 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040441.html#msg1040441), and, once again, it's not substantiated at all. We don't get those until #613 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040527.html#msg1040527), and they are:

- The ED1 thing Cheez first suspected way back when that was eventually dropped
- A mention of a comment Dormio made about Cheez when voting for Serela which ends up becoming an entire paragraph that doesn't tell why Dormio is scum for it
- An accusation of fluffposting, which tries to highlight a specific post as an example and ironically links to a post that, despite being diminutive in volume, actually contains more opinions on why certain players are scum than Cheez's entire game library of posts up to this point

The middle of those posts is the only thing that's possibly relevant (voting mid-D2 on an ED1 thing you dropped on D1 is rofl, and the fluffposting accusation flies like a lead balloon), and ultimately Dormio explains what he meant in a way I can get behind in claiming Cheez was defending Serela.

The end of the Cheez/Dormio argument is in #635 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040662.html#msg1040662), where Cheez can't form a solid opinion of Dormio based on Day 2 happenings. Seriously, read that last paragraph and look at how completely up in the air it is. No solid conclusion whatsoever. So hey, there's some more non-opinions. And there's no more scum hjunting for the rest of the day (the vote for me is, surprise surprise, completely unexplained).

So Cheez's entire game has been almost zero scumhunting, zero casepushing, and one absolute lame duck of an attempt at a case. At this point in the game we know Cheez thinks Dormio could be scum for bad/no reasons, that I could be scum (or could have been scum prior to NNR's statement, noting the cut) for no reasons, and that's it.

This post took several hours to write and got cut by a Cheez post that, again, contains no scumhunting. (Though it does contain some useless cheerleading.) Two days of a near-total lack of substantiated opinions, no explained votes, and no attempts to push his alleged scumreads as viable lynch candidates is every indication of scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 05:05:29 AM
That was long and exhausting and I apologize to everyone for making you all read it but it's worth it. I haven't forgotten about Validon (or about addressing Mitsuki's case against me, if she/anyone else still wants me to do it). I plan on going over his Day 2 at my next opportunity, as much as that opportunity is not tonight. I still think he's likelier scum than town, though. I'm not entirely sure who the third scum would be. Seems like I'll need to open myself to the possibilities of Polaris and DNA.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 05:26:47 AM
Wow, these sort of Day Ones are more interesting than I thought. Harder, too. I've gone back through the thread a couple times and there's not much I can conclude. All of Kilga's posts, most of SB's posts and some of Darkie's posts make me think "scum", and several of Serela's posts and Darkie's posts make me think "town". That's more or less the limit to what I can gather, at least without a little bit more information. I don't really think I was right in suspecting Dormio anymore, and Paladin is still hard to read but I'm more inclined to see him as town right now. Shadoweh isn't contributing nearly as much as others are (probably less than Validon, though without as many words to show for it) and that has me a little worried.

I have no idea when I'm going to stop going back and forth on everybody in the entire game like this, but I know that at least SOME of these opinions are worth mentioning.

I guess I'll just be vaguely suspicious of Kilga for the time being. Kind of glad to see Darkie's not voting for a null read anymore.

WHEN THE HECK DID I SAY TH- oh right, sometime during Day 1. Pretty sure all of my opinions were pretty fluid back then, though I don't remember doubting myself about Dormio. Even though I guess I did.

So Cheez's entire game has been almost zero scumhunting, zero casepushing, and one absolute lame duck of an attempt at a case. At this point in the game we know Cheez thinks Dormio could be scum for bad/no reasons, that I could be scum (or could have been scum prior to NNR's statement, noting the cut) for no reasons, and that's it.

This post took several hours to write and got cut by a Cheez post that, again, contains no scumhunting. (Though it does contain some useless cheerleading.) Two days of a near-total lack of substantiated opinions, no explained votes, and no attempts to push his alleged scumreads as viable lynch candidates is every indication of scum.
I'm not used to making cases built solely off of the way people act. I truly am sorry I can't be as helpful as you would like, but it would appear I just haven't grown familiar enough with psychoanalysis stuff yet. The Dormio case I tried to push was pretty much my first honest attempt. You seem to be fairly confident in his innocence, so I'll acknowledge my argument was poor and limit myself to a strong gut feeling for the time being. That said, if I limit everything to a strong gut feeling (which I've been doing aside from posts in which I briefly point out any specific posts that give me these feelings) I can't very well make a case for anybody.

Anyway, even if I am as useless as you're making me out to be, I don't see why I'd have to be scum in order to play this poorly.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 05:37:50 AM
I keep feeling like that's an insufficient response because it hardly even makes mention of one point aside from your summary/conclusion but honestly there's hardly anything among the rest that isn't summed up in the end there. I don't intend to undermine any of the rest of the post, at any rate.

I would like to point out, though, that the first reason I suspected Dormio for was never one I specifically rejected like you keep saying I did. The one post where you assume that's the case is me being wishy-washy and calling my reasoning into question. This was temporary and after thinking for some time, I decided that no, I was not wrong to suspect Dormio for those reasons after all.

On the other hand, me not pushing my cases is something I should fix. I can accept that.

On the other other hand, it'll be... interesting getting used to making cases that rely purely on speculation, but I can try.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 05:43:01 AM
I decided that no, I was not wrong to suspect Dormio for those reasons after all.
Yeah, I know, "for that reason" is probably a more accurate phrase.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 05:51:34 AM
...wait
I'm going back and forth on NNR's declaration because I think a Mitsuki/NNR/??? scum team could guess I'd come out guns blazing against Mitsuki today (which I admit I was planning on doing) and perhaps decided to pull this stunt to get me to look elsewhere? This is based on a lot of role speculation, though, and probably a degree of paranoia on top of that. There's also a lingering degree of massive irritation at the idea that all of Shadowy, Mitsuki, and NNR could be town, particularly given I think Dormio is likelier to be town than scum with that hammer.
Shadoweh, Mitsuki, and NNR, huh? That's a fairly interesting conclusion given that one of those three flipped town (not telling you who though, that's privileged information :V)

Pointlessness aside, I'd like to see what this would have said if you were paying attention. It's an interesting theory.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 05:53:05 AM
...

Help, I'm hopelessly dumb tonight. Good grief.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 05:56:39 AM
Mitsuki Is not on yet, but I want to see her reaction to my results as well.

Before, I noted Cheez's lack of scumhunting as well, mostly for the fact he didn't have a vote for most of D2. He's #2 on my threatdown.

Reads on Validon are still town to me for the reasons I stated on D2. To be fair, relying on a read that is based on a single reaction isn't too reliable though, so I'll have to keep a close eye on him to see if my opinion sours. I liked Dormio's content, what he could put out, and my gut reads him as town.

On my top scumread, SP is still the #1 threat in my opinion. His Late D2 was really ringing alarm bells, especially with getting wishy-washy on Shadoweh ...which is followed by today's QOTD:
Quote
I'm pretty shocked that Shadoweh turned out to be town.
he once again plays up the "Oops! Townie!" reaction again, which is even stranger with his soured gut posts from yesterday. "Oops! Townie!" should reaffirm he really wanted Shadoweh dead, when his lasts posts were reconsidering. Do you want his head? Do you want to reconsider? Make up your mind. Not even going to go into the point that he was asking Mitsuki to reconsider the null read on Shadoweh in the same hour.

While his hilariously wild misconceptions that I was "defending" Shadoweh are also pretty silly, especially considering I actually went to say he was scum when I actually got around to reading him.

Not as major, but it irks me just a bit how he readily dropped me and my soft-clears after my claim, considering how much he was against me on D2.

another random thing
Quote
Some people have said 'Why is Sky pushing Shadoweh?' because I didn't give a clear case before.  I thought that if I did this, it would also give Shadoweh a good opportunity to deliver a solid rebuttal
this is also... really bad and a really poor excuse. You didn't put solid reasoning on your initial Shadoweh vote so that she could... defend herself and get redemption? I'm not sure what to think of this. Would gut a lot scummier if Shadoweh flipped scum, but I don't like how he really plays up the Shadoweh Remorse card while hunting his head.

overall, along with my d2 case, signs point to Paladin being scum. I could quote more stuff but he really reads kinda like Dark does by default: A crazy conspiracy theorist who makes up wild claims to accuse people of being scum.
---
Quote
I know it would be super-bad for doc to put themselves in danger but it would also be pretty cool to learn the identity of two townies. I'll let the doc gauge the risks and decide for themselves though. Actually, would the person who was attacked and saved have noticed it? I'm not familiar with whether or not it works that way around here.
uhhh... is this rolefishing? I can't make it out, to be honest. Doc saves usually do not get informed if they were attacked, although BPs sometimes do if they limited charges.

reaction from Kilga to my reveal very much reinforces my belief that him and Mitsuki are town and not scumbuddies. If he were scum I would have expected him to be much less hesitant to accept a softclear.

btw: I did crumb my role quite a lot on D2, if anyone has to ask. I won't reveal all my details. I do like to think I'm in a very solid position if the need arises, however.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 06:17:10 AM
Oh shoot. I just remembered the real reason I swapped my vote to Kilga. I would've been the sixth vote on Shadoweh for a while, but Kilga kept saying "I'd vote and end the day but I'd like to see what [player] has to say first" and up until he decided to wait for SB, of all people, I agreed that it's good to hear people talk and refrained from ending the day prematurely. Mitsuki jumped in right after Kilga stopped being convincing, so I kept my vote off Shadoweh. After a while, there were a couple votes on Kilga, and at that point I was pleased to find somebody suspicious to vote for that I could possibly help lynch without ending the day early.

Yes, I am fully aware that changing my reasoning for something as important as a vote is incredibly suspicious, and honestly if I wasn't me I'd probably switch my vote to me immediately, but I'd rather tell the truth now so that I don't end up 1) telling it later and being called out for it then, or 2) forgetting what the truth was YET AGAIN sometime later on and acting on the assumption that what I posted earlier was true.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 06:27:04 AM
---uhhh... is this rolefishing? I can't make it out, to be honest. Doc saves usually do not get informed if they were attacked, although BPs sometimes do if they limited charges.
How'd I miss this?

Anyway, thank you for letting me know. That just makes things a little less convenient than they could be, but that's fine.

I should probably sleep before I accidentally blurt out something even more brainless than what there's been so far tonight. Maybe next I'll assume Kilga and Mitsuki have Polaris and Serela's roles or something. That would be roughly on par with the rest of my D3 posts.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 08, 2013, 06:39:38 AM
##Vote Sky Paladin

I'm continuing this from yesterday, where I mentioned it here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039899.html#msg1039899) and here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040528.html#msg1040528).

So the big thing I should probably be looking at is Sky Palladium's post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040972.html#msg1040972), which contains the bulk of his Shadoweh case.
From what I can see, it basically boils down to Shadoweh's inactivity and her joint attack on him with the CF7/NNR slot.
However, in regards to the latter reason, if you look at the following paragraph:
Also in that same post, Shadoweh then votes for the afk slot - NekoNekoRex/CF7.  NNR then had this to say about me (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040326.html#msg1040326) and I was just incredulous that anybody could have been suspecting me over Shadoweh at this stage.  I thought the most obvious answer was that NNR was trying to save Shadoweh, probably because they were scumbuddies.  This was largely because NNR straight up focused on me without any consideration of Shadoweh.  That's the reason I asked Mitsuki to ISO Shadoweh also.  I want both sides of the argument considered.  But I don't consider Mitsuki as automatically scum because unlike NNR, she used good reasoning and showed a lot of effort and consideration went in to her post.  NNR just copy pasted things out of context and made stuff up.  So it looks bad for them, and by association, Shadoweh. 
I just kind of don't get it, or something.
Mostly the latter part, but it kind of reads more like self-justification?
Like I don't get why he feels the need to justify his relations with Mitsuki and how he thought she was all super lovely and stuff.
Like why is Mitsuki mentioned in the first place?
Not really all that sure about how to describe it.
But it ties into my earlier thoughts that Sky Palladium and how he's just being too clean(?) this game.
I mean look at his last D2 post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041031.html#msg1041031).
Again he's complaining that he doesn't actually have any solid feelings about the wagon.
It's so wishy-washy. Just like with Serela.
In addition to that, I don't like how in that post he states that he will have absolutely no leads when the next day rolls along if Shadoweh is town.
I mean, it's like he's trying to give himself a free pass to not produce content under the guise of being confused when the next day begins.
And if you look at his D3 posts (these (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041454.html#msg1041454) two (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041457.html#msg1041457) for example) it's like all well what does any of this mean?
He's just abusing the pass he made himself at the end of D2 by saying that he would be confused if Shadoweh flipped town, isn't he?

Also, on Cheez8.
So, like, I said it here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040162.html#msg1040162), he basically doesn't give any reasoning for any of his reads for us to follow.
It's kind of just like "hey look these guys are totally scum because I said so I'm totally scumhunting with you guys right?", you know?
I also had problems with Cheez8's posts that were in direct retaliation to me which you can read here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040533.html#msg1040533) and here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040580.html#msg1040580).
Also, when I read things like this:
My motivation for switching to Kilga was pretty shallow. Basically, I suspected him more than I suspected Shadoweh. Since lynching Kilga suddenly started to appear as a faint possibility, I decided I wanted to help lynch him more than I wanted to help lynch Shadoweh.

I admit I was seconds away from hammering Shadoweh earlier in the day, but that was when Shadoweh appeared to be the only potential lynch other than maaaaayyyybe NNR, but I don't suspect him that much.
I'm kind of all like "huh...".
It's like, he says that he suspected Kilga more than Shadoweh and that's why he voted for Kilga but what I'm wondering is where did these suspicions of Kilga even show up from in the first place?
I mean I think the closest thing is this:
Kilga concerns me but either he's town or he's good at being scum, because I can't really make a case for him yet.
But it's like, where did this come from?
Why does Kilga concern him?
I just don't get it.
It looks to me like Cheez8 was trying to get away with having made an original opinion about somebody that other people weren't really suspecting so that he could claim to be contributing some more to the topic or something, you know?

Warning - while you were typing 23 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Being kicked out of your room for a couple of hours because your mother decides to invade it to make a phone call sucks.
Taking a couple of hours to read content that appeared during the aforementioned disruptions because you can't concentrate also sucks.
Also, I almost gave myself a shock when I closed one of my "Post reply" tabs but fortunately it wasn't this one though I spent a full minute frantically going through my tabs to try to find this one again.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 06:48:25 AM
I'm at work in between classes so it's phone update ftw

Points
I dropped NNR because my case fell through when Shadoweh was town.
I was sorry for lynching Shadoweh because I felt largely responsible and I had made a mistake. That is my way.
I thought Mitsuki post was good because she used not-made-up stuff vs NNR who also said he hadnt read the thread day 1.
I tried hard to hunt scum. But I made a mistake on my target.
I think day 3 we should focus more on the people who didn't scum hunt at all. It's easy to dogpile me because I was wrong. But it's also not right. I made a bad judgement but my reasons were not argued with a the time. Nobody disagreed with me! So I don't think it's fair to jump on me now. You should have done it yesterday. To do it now appears suspicious IMO

See you in a few hours~
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 08, 2013, 06:55:03 AM
So I should, like, dedicate this post to Cheez8's D3 posts or something.
So one thing I really like about Cheez8's first post is this:
If Kilga and Mitsuki are the same alignment I'm left in a very confused state because my thoughts on Kilga were wildly wavering but leaning towards scum and my thoughts on Mitsuki were barely formed but leaning towards town. I'm probably going to conclude absolutely nothing on this front, ever.
I mean, I like how it's basically a complete ignorance of NNR's claimed results.
I mean NNR stated that the two are the same alignment, and Kilga is somebody that Cheez8 was willing to vote over Shadoweh on D2.
Except, he doesn't exactly want to give up on his Kilga "case" or something so he's all like "well I can't tell anything from this".
Which kind of like, you know, leaves himself with lots of options open.
He can either swing his Mitsuki read to scum just because he thinks Kilga is scummy or he can swing his Kilga read to town because he thinks Mitsuki is townie and nobody can really blame him for taking either course of action.
Isn't that convenient?
Also, the appeal to our emotions here:
Anyway, even if I am as useless as you're making me out to be, I don't see why I'd have to be scum in order to play this poorly.
Is pretty cute, isn't it?
I'll note how it's linked with his own mistakes so he can kill two birds with one stone.
He gets to backtrack on something he said while looking all cute and adorable and (hopefully) non-lynchable at the same time.
Isn't that great?
The other posts contain nothing of value either.
No reads.
Not a single mention of whether or not I, his big case that he's had for the majority of the game, am still scum to him or not.
Just ambiguity and defending himself.
:derp:

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
I just want to go without being cut. But, oh, how am I to live without you?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 08, 2013, 07:01:05 AM
And, now, to respond to the latest Sky Palladium post.
Well, since it's a phone post, I guess I should wait until he gets to elaborate further on a computer where you can actually type words fast but I want to ask about one thing.
I think day 3 we should focus more on the people who didn't scum hunt at all. It's easy to dogpile me because I was wrong. But it's also not right. I made a bad judgement but my reasons were not argued with a the time. Nobody disagreed with me! So I don't think it's fair to jump on me now. You should have done it yesterday. To do it now appears suspicious IMO
Isn't this a bit of an overreaction?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 07:03:59 AM
Good morning everyone post. I'll try not to write much because morning sure messes everything up for me. I haven't even read most of the posts.

Mitsuki and Kilgamayan are the same alignment. I'm inclined to believe this means they are both town.

... are you 100% sure?

Ok good to know. I was thinking that even though I was being critical of Mitsuki (perhaps overly so), I don't think she's exactly scum.

but like mitsuki are you scum? :o

because like I seriously don't know how you can just waltz in with scumreads the two people generally accepted as town (kilga and me, sorry for being a pretentious) while simultaneously refusing to consider any of the existing wagons, and adamantly at that. your credibility is decreased because it seems like you haven't really looked at the game properly, which makes me wonder if you're even serious about these cases or if you just made them up because you're trying to look SO HIP and PRO TOWN by challenging a widely held belief.

...



##Vote: Validon For now, but Polaris was so scummy yesterday and he clearly contradicted himself just now, as I've just pointed out. I'd place my vote on him, but I prefer to wait and write my case.
Also, it'd be dumb to vote Kilga now if I still have suspects and NNR says that about his role, but that doesn't mean I automatically trust his results. Kilga might be a godfather (was it called like that?)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 08, 2013, 07:04:11 AM
It seems I hit "Post" instead of "Preview".
Anyway, continuing from where I left off.

Isn't this a bit of an overreaction?
I mean, unless I missed a post, the only people voting for you right now are myself and NNR.
And I do recall that I was voting for you on D2 as well.
And I think that NNR was doing the same, and that you even said that NNR's vote on you was basically unsubstantiated.
So, it's like, what happened to that?
Why are you so paranoid about being blamed for the lynch?
Just like with Serela, why do you feel the need to distance yourself from the lynch so much?
Afraid of being tied to it?
Perhaps because you knew that the flips wouldn't be scum?
Just wondering.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 08, 2013, 07:04:48 AM
Also the cut reminded me that I should probably post about Validon but I kind of want dinner and I have no idea what will happen afterwards.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 07:47:56 AM
Quote
... are you 100% sure?
Let me answer that with another question: Do I have an obsession with catgirls?

The answer is yes
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 08, 2013, 08:14:46 AM
Votecount 3.2

Sky_Paladin (2): NekoNekoRex, Dormio
Cheez8 (2): Polaris, Kilgamayan
Validon (1): Mitsuki

Not Voting: (4) Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, Cheez8, Validon98

It's 5 to lynch and 69 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 11:26:14 AM
##cheeze8

Still at work

I actually think Validon is scum too, along with dark. I will explain when I get home. Just seeing them tere in. Of votging...it fills my heart with dread.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 12:10:43 PM
Let me answer that with another question: Do I have an obsession with catgirls?

The answer is yes

Have you considered that one of those adorable catgirls could actually be just a cosplayer? Did you check to see if her ears and tail were real?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 08, 2013, 01:31:43 PM
Look this is bullshit.

NNR and kilga are scums who didnt even bother to kill because atm everyone can be omgus into scumread.

NNR subbed in an originally scummy slot.
Kilga seems super protown but slips up at times.
Cheez never had any solid opinion.
Sky has super detailed insight and crazy insights in na and defends himself only.
Dormio is too normal and that makes him scum? W
Polaris is fufilling a possibly uberscum role impeded only by a town best pal.
Validon is being pushed on hard since d1.
 
We are losing hard. Rather than docblock as scum is trying to convince us what i see is them already being in the position where any more lynches will only narrow down the suspwct pool.

The scumteam is kilga nnr cheez. I had wavered on my stance on kilga because he basically responded every single one of  my accusation which i cannot challange him logically. Shadowy was justva dick who didnt eveb try to win as town and ends up looking scum to everyone


I admit it. My mind is a divine mess atm...where are the solid towns. Theres just so many obvscum.

I dont know what the fuck to do.
Irl real stuff will keep me busy for next entire day.

Replaxing out ty

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 08, 2013, 01:38:21 PM
Nevermind that.
It feels so gross and revolting to just surrender. Sorry but i redact my replaxement call ty.

I am going to push on and play and lynch the scum.

##: Vote kilgamayan

Its just gutread. Or more precisely, many details so small that adds up to fuel my suspicion. I believe he is scum and i vote for him. End of story.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 02:51:55 PM
I panicked before I went to work when I saw two votes for me and thought that everybody else would arbitrarily vote for me while I was away from the computer for a few hours.  So I voted Cheez8 because it seemed like the most credible wagon to save my selfish neck.  Then I read DNA's casual burn ://///

##unvote

I'm not going to be able to do a good read until around midphase as I am out of town from early tomorrow morning.  I'm watching a swordsmith make katanas though so it's totally worth it.  These are just my sign-off-before-bed thoughts.  There are some contradictions though which is why I'm not making a case for it.  It's just a 'here are my thoughts'. 

Kilga didn't vote for Shadoweh or Serela.  In Megatokyo mafia, the detective role could check how many scums voted for player x.  When I didn't see Kilga's name in the largest clump (the usual target for the detective check), I wondered if that might be a reason for it. 
Mitsuki seems legit to me.  But, I wondered why NNR would check her and Kilga.  It seemed like an odd comparison.  Also, I felt, it was an interesting coincidence that the slot-replacement player would check the other slot-replacement player.  Also, NNR can't say 'they are town', only 'they are the same faction'.  But Mitsuki's last minute try against Kilga on day2 made me think it's unlikely they are scumbuddies. 
Re:  Not defending anybody else.  I guess that's a good sign I'm town too - I don't can't trust anybody ;____;  More seriously:  Of course I wouldn't do it.  Kilga said it before - the best defence is a good offense.  At least, that's what I thought too.  I thought that the people who aren't scumhunting, or are scumhunting poorly, are good suspects.  That's why when NNR and Dormio use vague/wrong arguments against me, I was suspicious of them. 
I think that NNR and Dormio are using fake arguments or trying to make assumptions based on 'facts' that aren't proven.  But then I consider that's essentially what my motiviation for voting Shadoweh was, so I'm like hmmm well I have to consider they are actually well-meaning townies who are alarmed.  It's hard not to knee-jerk and go IF YOU ARE ATTACKING ME YOU MUST BE SCUM since I know I'm town :D  But Dormio also made some good points on Cheez8 so I can't just blanket assume they are scum. 

Therefore atm my towny picks are - though I am loathe to say it - NNR, and Dormio.  I would put Kilga and Mitsuki as probably town.  Dark has gone kind of null for me atm. 

That leaves Validon, Cheez8, Polaris as my three scum picks. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 02:59:49 PM
Oops post instead of preview. 

But then Polaris is voting for Cheez8, so...I'm pretty sure at least one of my scum picks is wrong.  There's the meta idea of, well, Polaris had the best pals thing.  We had some speculation that might be a scum role because...well...it seemed right.  If it was scum/town, then there was some good reason for scum to kill-off the other town buddy so their guy was free to vote wherever.  Would they do it though?  It would be a good clear tell that Polaris was scum.  But town killed off Serela so we can't know.  It's really...a how do you feel.  I think Polaris is a good candidate for a 'same as Kilga/Mitsuki team' check.  So I will pencil Polaris in as 'not-scum-for-today'. 

So then I'm left with Validon and Cheez8. 

I don't have a viable third pick right now - just DNA (null), 50% could-be-scum (Polaris), and the rest seem green to me.  But you know what, I don't need to pick all three.  If we can get one today, then it'll be easier to work out the rest. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 03:05:17 PM
So in the end, as I'm away for a good couple of hours, I am going to put a vote in.  The choice between my two picks is thankfully also the two that seem to be popular today (that are also not me) and also being posted by people who I think to be town. 

There's a part of me that is thinking "Well what if NNR, Mitsuki and Kilga are scumbuddies X___X" but it just seems too unlikely. 

Therefore, I'll vote for Cheez8, since Kilga put out that epic post. 

##Vote Cheez8  Sadly I could have saved myself an hour by not posting anything and just leaving my vote for Cheez8 as it was.  Oh well. 

I'll be around once more in the morning for like 5 minutes if I need to vote switch but for now, I rest.  Goodnight~
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 03:43:31 PM
The other posts contain nothing of value either.
No reads.
Not a single mention of whether or not I, his big case that he's had for the majority of the game, am still scum to him or not.
Just ambiguity and defending himself.
My entire state of mind contained nothing of value either last night. I already failed at the task of simple observation several times over, so building a case that made any sort of coherent sense was even more out of the question than it usually is for me.

You want to know what I think? I'll tell you. I might not scour the thread for why I think what I do yet, but dang it I am not going to sit idly by and let you guys lynch a townie just because I'm not used to this type of game yet.

Paladin is becoming increasingly suspicious in my eyes. If I wasn't already suspicious of Kilga and Dormio I'd be entirely suspicious of him. In fact, by this point, I'm willing to put aside my doubts about them, because Dormio's recent posts about Paladin have been spot-on. On top of that he's basically seemed to waver while supporting both of the major wagons over the past two days, and I can tell he's preparing to do the same today. In fact, it seems like he beat me to bringing up that particular point:

I panicked before I went to work when I saw two votes for me and thought that everybody else would arbitrarily vote for me while I was away from the computer for a few hours.  So I voted Cheez8 because it seemed like the most credible wagon to save my selfish neck.
Voting for an easy wagon while leaving himself an opportunity to bail yet again if he feels like switching stances or going with the "I knew we shouldn't have lynched them!" route. On top of that I'm starting to suspect that the reason I haven't been able to get a good read on him earlier in the game was because many of his posts either didn't say anything constructive, said constructive things that other people all said first, or said things that only would have been constructive if they made sense.

That leaves me at a bit of a loss concerning my scumreads though. If Paladin is scum, Dormio probably isn't, and Kilga probably isn't either, which means I'd have to overturn a lot of my thinking so far.

I'm still not convinced on Darkie. The nagging possibility that he's scum has been bothering me for a while, and even if he is town, I can't glean anything useful from his posts. It would be bad to mislynch a rolecop but the way things are going I'm doubting whether or not he's going to receive any results this game anyway, so it's not as big of a risk as I thought. I wouldn't be surprised no matter what alignment he ends up.

If Paladin is scum after all... I haven't given it much thought, but the first few scumteams that come to mind are either him, Mitsuki, and NNR, or him, Darkie, and Validon. If Dormio is scum after all, then I think the scumteam is him, Kilga, and either NNR or Mitsuki. There was some logic behind these choices but I can't be bothered to recall what it was at the moment.

Anyway there you go. You wanted opinions, I gave you opinions, and yes, I put absolutely no reasoning behind them since I'm lazy. You'll want reasoning next, and that'll come later. Right now, I know that this is what I believe. In fact, here's a vote for you too.

##Vote: Sky_Paladin

Looking back through this post, I'm beginning to worry about whether I have the proper idea of what a read is, but not very much.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 04:13:55 PM
And if I'm right, Validon and one other should join the lynch on me; thus giving you the scums, and justifying my death as town. 

Guess I won't be seeing you tomorrow :)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 08, 2013, 04:17:58 PM
Votecount 3.3

Sky_Paladin (3): NekoNekoRex, Dormio, Cheez8
Cheez8 (3): Polaris, Kilgamayan, Sky_Paladin
Validon (1): Mitsuki
Kilgamayan (1): Darkninjaabc

Not Voting: (1) Validon98

It's 5 to lynch and 61 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 04:36:14 PM
I was going to put this in the same post than my Polaris case, but I guess it's important to post it now (@_@)

All the people who are considering Cheez8 as a lynch candidate should have in mind that, even if he's played games before, he himself stated that they were based on psychology stuff much less (he stated so himself on RPG Mafia thread when he joined). If you take that in mind his actions are null, not scummy.
Actually defended himself already saying that. Whatever, I'm still leaving this so that you know that I'm not going to be considering lynching him, at least based on what I've seen.

Sky Paladin is the player I like reading the most by a fair margin, I don't know why he's being voted (?_o)

Like I don't get why he feels the need to justify his relations with Mitsuki and how he thought she was all super lovely and stuff.

Honestly it feels like Vhaltz justifying himself, which is something he tended to do a year ago. And then I was like "You don't need to say that, I already know @A@"
I think he just feared people misinterpreting his actions. Why would Paladin try to convince me of Shadoweh being scum when she was getting lynched anyways? He was just trying to reduce his cognitive dissonance (he was doubting on Shadoweh and my opinion on her made him doubt more, so he tried to resolve the conflict by convincing me), and scum wouldn't have any of that because they already knew Shadoweh was town. Look, I don't like to have townreads, but I'm townreading him. Probably NNR too, but I shouldn't stop considering he can still be scum with Kilga.


I haven't forgotten about Validon (or about addressing Mitsuki's case against me, if she/anyone else still wants me to do it).

I do! (owo)/
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 05:01:42 PM
Darkninja, by voting Kilga you do realize you have to submit to the fact Mitsuki is very likely to also be scum, right?

Quote
NNR and kilga are scums who didnt even bother to kill because
Actually no I'm sorry I can't read posts that even try to employ logic like this
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 05:04:35 PM
Dark have you gotten any results so far?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 05:22:31 PM
Quote
NR and kilga are scums [..]

NNR subbed in an originally scummy slot.
Kilga seems super protown but slips up at times.
I- I just
How can you contradict yourself and use such bad reasoning in the same post?

Quote
Cheez never had any solid opinion.
Sky has super detailed insight and crazy insights in na and defends himself only.
Dormio is too normal and that makes him scum? W
Polaris is fufilling a possibly uberscum role impeded only by a town best pal.
Validon is being pushed on hard since d1.
The listpost
The summarization
The lack of analysis
How- Where do you even come up with these

I just don't

 :colonveeplusalpha:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 05:32:17 PM
Paladin, as much as I would like to try and push your faulty logic... speaking of that

Quote
I think that NNR and Dormio are using fake arguments or trying to make assumptions based on 'facts' that aren't proven.
Can you care to back this up with evidence?

...anyway, I cannot ignore Dark any more.

##Unvote
##Vote: Darkninjaabc

He should be lynched for that post alone. Like, seriously, that is the worst Mafia post I have ever read.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 05:38:15 PM
##Unvote
##Vote: Darkninjaabc
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 06:01:28 PM
Darkninja, by voting Kilga you do realize you have to submit to the fact Mitsuki is very likely to also be scum, right?

"Very likely"

So you're not sure about the catgirls after all. \(owo)/
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 06:01:44 PM
Posting tiny tidbits from work. I will do what I can to participate this weekend but I will have my girlfriend over the entire time and she's just a tad distracting. <_<

Mitsuki: I would consider buying that defense if Cheez were scumhunting in some other fashion. The problem isn't that his hunting is weird, or different, or wrong, or whatever else. The problem is that his scumhunting is nonexistent. What possible kind of off-site pro-town playstyle involves posting extremely few suspicions without justifying them and needing to be grabbed and yanked around by the short hairs before actually voting for someone? Please describe something sensible in detail, I'm going to rip my hair out if the response to this is something as nebulous and impossible to logically argue as your justifications for thinking Shadowy's actions and Cheez's actions not scummy.

Cheez: Why was I suspicious for wanting to hear from SB one last time before dropping a hammer? SB was doomed to disappear as soon as the day ended. If there was one person in the game that shouldn't have been cut off by a hammer, it was him.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 06:20:36 PM
Perhaps there's a different/better way to ask that first question.

Mitsuki, what would you consider scummy behaviour from someone of Cheez's background?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 06:38:57 PM
Cheez: Why was I suspicious for wanting to hear from SB one last time before dropping a hammer? SB was doomed to disappear as soon as the day ended. If there was one person in the game that shouldn't have been cut off by a hammer, it was him.
I never said you were suspicious. That was just when you stopped convincing me that there was a reason not to end the day. Prove me wrong if you'd like.

For reference, since you bring it up, this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040763.html#msg1040763) is the last post from SB that day. It's #650. This (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040821.html#msg1040821) is the post where you decide you want to hear from SB again before ending the day. It's #654. And one of the three posts inbetween was nothing more than a votecount. I can't see why you'd expect SB to have something more to say.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 06:40:14 PM
Mitsuki: I would consider buying that defense if Cheez were scumhunting in some other fashion. The problem isn't that his hunting is weird, or different, or wrong, or whatever else. The problem is that his scumhunting is nonexistent. What possible kind of off-site pro-town playstyle involves posting extremely few suspicions without justifying them and needing to be grabbed and yanked around by the short hairs before actually voting for someone? Please describe something sensible in detail, I'm going to rip my hair out if the response to this is something as nebulous and impossible to logically argue as your justifications for thinking Shadowy's actions and Cheez's actions not scummy.

... I never thought any of them was town, I thought they were null (and town due to me already having strong scumreads, except on Polaris at the time but odds still said town). Oh well, whatever.

I'm not saying that Cheez is protown, I'm saying that I see no scum intent on him. I think he's just bad at mafia (MotK mafia) and needs experience/maybe self confidence too. I simply think this is the right explanation for his behaviour.
... you're going to rip your hair out aren't you. Sigh. I'm interested on being understood, but this usually happens.
It's not usually a matter of poor explanations. Some people understand what I say and some others not (even if the people who understand explain). I'm used to this kind of thing. I can keep on trying to explain it if you want, but I doubt that'll help and you'd become more frustrated (>_<)

Ok, replying to the new question now: I don't know. If I saw it, I'd point it out. (@A@) I mainly use my intuition, which is implicit knowledge. It only becomes explicit when I get the feeling that something is wrong.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 06:50:47 PM
Mitsuki: I would consider buying that defense if Cheez were scumhunting in some other fashion. The problem isn't that his hunting is weird, or different, or wrong, or whatever else. The problem is that his scumhunting is nonexistent. What possible kind of off-site pro-town playstyle involves posting extremely few suspicions without justifying them and needing to be grabbed and yanked around by the short hairs before actually voting for someone? Please describe something sensible in detail, I'm going to rip my hair out if the response to this is something as nebulous and impossible to logically argue as your justifications for thinking Shadowy's actions and Cheez's actions not scummy.
I'm not quite sure why this question was posed at Mitsuki.

To answer your question, I'd say the kind of playstyle that also involves taking into account several unsteady and conflicting reports of "concrete" evidence, and incorporating them into existing suspicions and gutreads in order to reach conclusions. In many of the games that I've played, town members have been less hesitant to provide reports, and mafia members have been less hesitant to provide fake reports. The lack of concrete evidence, falsified or otherwise, is the reason I have been so hesitant to vote.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 06:59:34 PM
If we also assume Polaris is town, that leaves four.
I really don't get why we should assume Polaris is town. Anyways.


Polaris

I might have just been self conscious about sheeping Kilga too much.

Associative reads with Kilga, go. It's not strong, definitely, but scumbuddies would be alert about not shipping their scumbuddies too much. It'd be a problem if their scumbuddy was lynched, and it was D1 so nothing was set yet, not even Kilga's ?towniness?.

Another example of this is how Polaris inmediately changes his vote to Validon D2 after Kilga's post, but then he voteparks for two irl days while saying things about Shadoweh. It'd have been too noticeable that he was just following Kilga's vote.

@Validon: Ok but you better know that we're going to lynch you if you don't start scumhunting at some point  ::)

This plainly looks like a post taken straight from the scum QT. I mean, nobody would tell someone else that they're going to lynch them due to a lack of scumhunting if the time comes they place their vote and that's all. Validon's lack of an answer to this is actually scummy too, overall his attitude this game has been not Validon-ish at all. But I already talked about Validon before.

This is all not that strong, I know. As I said Polaris is the person who I was less certain of being scum. Not anymore, though:

but like mitsuki are you scum? :o

because like I seriously don't know how you can just waltz in with scumreads the two people generally accepted as town (kilga and me, sorry for being a pretentious) while simultaneously refusing to consider any of the existing wagons, and adamantly at that. your credibility is decreased because it seems like you haven't really looked at the game properly, which makes me wonder if you're even serious about these cases or if you just made them up because you're trying to look SO HIP and PRO TOWN by challenging a widely held belief.

I'm not going to point out Polaris' contradiction on his opinion on me again. Let's ask a question instead: why does Polaris think that my posts are bad?

- He says that scumreading people generally accepted as town is bad
Why? Is the dynamics of a group that has already mislynched twice an example of what I should believe?

- He says I'm refusing to consider the existing wagons
I said so myself and I explained why. My scumreads were too clear to consider lynching someone else.

- He says that I'm not credible enough because it seemed like I hadn't looked at the game properly and that I made up my cases because of that
I had looked at the game properly, but why should I remember everything? It's just generalizing to say that I didn't read the game properly just because of that.
Anyways, how can he go from ?not reading properly? to ?having made up the cases?? I don't get how one thing can be derived from the other, specially when my cases are so damn long and complete.

- He says I'm trying to look hip and pro town
People who are already hip and pro town don't need to try to look hip and pro town (?wu) Ok, now seriously. Why should his perception of my identity affect how good/bad my cases are?

^ basically my first impressions of mitsuki. not a fan of nitpicky quotestrippy cases either `_`

- He says that he's not a fan of my cases
How is liking a kind of case related to its quality? (And if it comes to this, all I have to say is that I'm not a fan of wrong cases)

It's ok that Mitsuki has unique and interesting opinions but I'm unhappy with her staunch refusal to care about anyone else, which seems unnecessarily stubborn and could border on tunneling. And her cases do give off the impression of tunnel vision and confirmation bias, seeing as her cases are really quotestrippy and it looks like she was selectively reading all the "bad" parts to make a case without looking at a coherent whole, and when it looks like she hasn't read the game properly, it makes it worse. It's how she handled her opinions that are worse than her actual opinions, more than anything.

The part about it being okay to have unique views is a contradiction by itself because he said that it was wrong for me to doubt common townreads. But I'll keep analyzing like before:

- He says that I don't care about anything else and that means I'm tunelling
It's not possible to say from my posts that I don't care about anything else because in fact not wanting to vote townies (who were null reads, but I considered them townies because of my reverse PoE where I guess who the townies are because I have strong opinions on who the scum are) is caring about what happens. Anyways, having 3 scumreads is not tunelling as far as I know, and you can't really say that I haven't considered anybody else based on my posts.

- My cases give the impression of confirmation bias, tunnel vision, are quotestrippy, selectively reading the bad parts without having in mind a ?coherent whole?...
There are literally no cited reasons on why he thinks all of that from my cases. If I wanted to, I could say ?hey guys, X is a bitch, sews poorly and she copies all my cosplays!!!?, but if I don't provide evidence it's worth nothing.
Also, quotestrippy cases are the best.

Well I have to undermine her because her cases are dumb.

- He says that the reason he's attacking me is because my cases are dumb
Why should the quality of my cases, when I hadn't already made a case on Polaris, be a matter of concern for him?
Hold on that sentence.


Let's analyze what we have so far: the reasons given to say that my cases aren't valid are that 1- I haven't read properly, the style of my cases is bad, etc / 2- tunnel vision, other biases / 3- My identity is bad

So well, what does this say about how my cases are? Nothing. You could say all of this about anybody else (obviously changing some parts, like ?quotestrippy? to ?quoteless?), it'd contain no actual replies to the cases and it'd make it look like they're terrible.
It made my cases look like shit without actually saying anything about my thoughts.

I checked to see if this was something that Polaris did just to me or if it's something that he's done to more people. Polaris replied to the other cases properly, Polaris-style. I'm not saying that he did perfect, but he certainly had valid (maybe right, maybe wrong) points.
Why did he bother to write all of that, why did he feel the need to do so, if it had very little to do with him? Because I must have been right, at least with one of the two cases, and he suddenly feared losing.

But no, I'm not saying that he did all of this consciously. He clearly wanted my cases to look bad, but he genuinely thought they were bad and that the reasons he gave stood. Scum wouldn't agree just like that about what it's been said about them, it's just a matter of pride. And what do people with hurt pride do, like a girl who fears her friend will get the boy she loves? They baselessy critisize the one who threatens them.

##Unvote
##Vote: Polaris

Now I think he has more chances to be scum than Validon, the same than Kilga but I'm willling to ignore him for now due to NNR's role.

Actually there are a few things left to say/analyze, but I'm running out of time. I'll think about them later, but this is the most important part!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 07:48:51 PM
Quote
So you're not sure about the catgirls after all. \(owo)/
I'm not sure if the results I get from my role can be messed with, although I'd like to think not. I'm about 95% confident my results are accurate.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 07:50:00 PM
I'm 100% sure what I've announced so far is accurate as far as the information I have, though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 08, 2013, 07:50:57 PM
I'll have some more comprehensive reading done again in an hour or so,  have to get busy with stuff
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 08:07:42 PM
Still limited time, still not in a position to respond to things in-depth. However I want to do our dearly departed Shadowert a solid and put this out now, since it was a background part of my decision of Cheez being scum.

Mitsuki, when you next get the chance, I'd like you to construct one of Shadowy's patented Color-Coded Vote Counts using the Day 2 End vote count. Mark all flipped townies as green, and for the sake of entertaining this hypothetical, mark myself and NNR green as well. Post that vote count and tell me what you see, particularly in how it relates to your scum reads.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 08:11:09 PM
(Anyone else is welcome to construct this vote count if they want to see it in action, though they'll need to mark Mitsuki green as well.)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 10:25:57 PM
Or I guess you yardtards could just wait 45 minutes for me to get home and do it myself. >_>

I've been doing a lot of thinking about this in the car. The way the end of Day 2 went down needs to be looked over heavily in light of my dwellings on the color-coded vote count. It's pushing me further and further toward Cheez, at least, and makes me want to hear from Mitsuki on the matter a lot harder.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 08, 2013, 10:31:59 PM
*got waylaid by work for most of the day*
*looks at the thread*
*sees many massive walls of text*

...Yeah, I'm going to have to spend some time to catch up. I glanced some of the stuff over and I know accusations are flying everywhere, but I'm going to have to read stuff in more detail. For now I'll be the first to construct the vote count as per Kilga's request. I might make another one after I do some ISOs with my own opinions.


Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

...So that's the reason, huh. Yeah, you're like the towniest person in the game, and Cheez voting you at the end of the day makes me go urgh. Sky was another person who made me go urgh, so I'll be ISOing the two of them over the next while. I'm not sure at the moment who of the two of them is the scummiest, but I'll decide that once I'm done.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 08, 2013, 10:33:47 PM
The thing is that sans kilga and nnr i have no scumreads.

This is also exactly why i think kilga called for n.okill. Anyone dying now really is good

I have to say it again but i dont care about scums opinion and weird push. I just dont see scumdormio behaviorwise and i dont trust nnr.

I cant form anything. I literally hss only one hour to read everything. Post to fufill the wordcount and that shit.i doubt i will actually help aside from sheeping at last moment.

I am even just aticking aro und clinging desperately because how ahitty it feels to surrender

I am not the core piece of any of these puzzles. Mitsuki and cheez are howevet.

Scum is denying us every flipinfo and rely on their skills alone. Isnt it then obvious at least one scun would act superprotown? Eithet they have aome other way to secure a sure win this day, which is very likelt. And nothing else isvpossible.

There arw just too goddamn many variables which is bull.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 10:35:59 PM
Validon: Highlight Shadowy and Mitsuki as green as well.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 10:36:38 PM
Oh wait you did that.

Highlight the names of the people being votes for extra emphasis.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 10:37:06 PM
*people being voted

phoooooooooneposting
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 10:38:31 PM
For now, but Polaris was so scummy yesterday and he clearly contradicted himself just now, as I've just pointed out.

uh did you even read? I said that "I was critical of you but I don't think you're exactly scum". if you look carefully the only place I actually use the word "scum" is at the very beginning, because your cases were just dumb, but I never expressed a desire to lynch you. I attacked you because I know your scum reads are 100% wrong (at least, the one on me) and you needed to realize that your "totally clear" scum reads weren't clear at all. Which is why I clarified that I didn't think you were scum at the beginning of the day.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 08, 2013, 10:44:20 PM
There's no highlighting option, so I just threw all of the emphasizing things I could on it. :V

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

Like this?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 10:49:55 PM
honestly I just think Mitsuki is being pretentious right now, because her confirmation bias is intense to the point of no return. the only thing I can think of that'll make her change her mind is going to be my flip, and I'm not going to let that happen, so whatever. her entire case on me is useless since she misinterpreted my attacking of her cases to be me thinking that she was scum, so I'd rather see what sort of case she had in mind before all that happened.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 10:55:37 PM
My main motivation for voting Cheez was his strange jump off of Serela at the end of Day 1, and a similar jump off of Shadoweh at the end of Day 2, both with little-to-no reasoning for lynching, and it felt like he was trying to avoid being on the lynch for someone who would eventually flip town (because he had that prior knowledge as scum).
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 10:57:59 PM
honestly I'm more annoyed at Mitsuki for saying my opinion of her was a "clear contradiction" because that seems like an insult to my intelligence more than anything.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 08, 2013, 10:59:57 PM
All things considered with the votecount, I'm going to look at Cheez first. This is going to take a while. <_>;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 11:00:46 PM
uh did you even read? I said that "I was critical of you but I don't think you're exactly scum". if you look carefully the only place I actually use the word "scum" is at the very beginning, because your cases were just dumb, but I never expressed a desire to lynch you. I attacked you because I know your scum reads are 100% wrong (at least, the one on me) and you needed to realize that your "totally clear" scum reads weren't clear at all. Which is why I clarified that I didn't think you were scum at the beginning of the day.

As far as I know people don't go "are you scum?"  to people you think that are town. You don't, either:

but like mitsuki are you scum? :o

cheez are you scum

(D1, Polaris already suspected Cheez)

Polaris, it'd actually be nice if you stopped doing the things that I accuse you of in my case and actually replied properly. There's no way my entire case goes down like that even if that point was wrong, and you're not pointing out why either.
The case I had on mind before is in the post and I think it's cleary noticeable, the first part of the post is separated from the second by a "not anymore"... did you even read it? (o__o)


Kilga, that hypotetical situation makes no sense in my head. Anyways, explain yourself.
I guess I'd be suspecting Polaris and Validon anyways if you were town, which is what I'm pushing now. I don't know who the 3rd scum would be.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:04:36 PM
if you look a little later, you can see that I go "i'm facetiously suspecting cheez" hmm what could that mean oh IT WAS A JOKE
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:08:44 PM
Look Mitsuki, the only thing your "case" on me proves is that I hate your cases. And that is true. I think your cases legitimately suck. But the only reasoning you have on why I could be scum for that is... let's see..

But no, I'm not saying that he did all of this consciously. He clearly wanted my cases to look bad, but he genuinely thought they were bad and that the reasons he gave stood. Scum wouldn't agree just like that about what it's been said about them, it's just a matter of pride. And what do people with hurt pride do, like a girl who fears her friend will get the boy she loves? They baselessy critisize the one who threatens them.

and this is just a completely unsupported hypothetical, which ignores the fact that town also has pride that can be hurt, skipping directly to HE MUST BE SCUM SO HE DID THIS (which is confirmation bias)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 11:09:52 PM
Mitsuki: The hypothetical is assuming NNR's report about us is true. <_< This is largely the point of this exercise.

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

This is how things look from your perspective (assuming you're town etc etc etc). Pick out possible scum teams from this based on how the End of Day 2 went down, and reason out why they're possible.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:11:11 PM
and if you're going to waltz in here and stomp all over me and other town reads with Bad? cases, then of course I'm going to look down on you, especially when you say that you refuse to look at other people because you  have "100% scum reads!" when I know that those scum reads are 100% wrong (at least in my case).
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:13:40 PM
and honestly if your pre-mitsuki case on me were two quotes which could be scummy while totally ignoring everything else like a genuine attempt at scumhunting and responding properly to other cases with valid points (which you yourself acknowledge) then I'm going to call that a case of tunnel vision. The same goes for your case on Kilga.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:20:54 PM
Darkninja: (used larger font so that he doesn't miss it in the midst of my mitsuki-fueled rage): did you get a result from your role last night or no?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 11:23:34 PM
Kilga, as I've said, I'd still be suspecting Polaris and Validon, because of the reasons I stated. Forget about the associative reads with you, and I still think my cases on them + associative reads stand, even if they lose a bit of strenght.


and this is just a completely unsupported hypothetical, which ignores the fact that town also has pride that can be hurt, skipping directly to HE MUST BE SCUM SO HE DID THIS (which is confirmation bias)

What pride would have been hurt with my cases if you were town?


Anyways, I'm stopping answering to Polaris, this is going nowhere as long as he keeps that attitude. If someone thinks he brings up a valid point, tell me and I'll answer to you.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 11:24:23 PM
Okay, let's say Validon and Polaris are scumbuddies. Who's their partner?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 11:27:12 PM
Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

By the way, I'm colouring Paladin green too since I'm townreading him and I doubt that'll change.


Kilga, I have no idea. One of the non-coloured names now is the only thing I can guess. Sorry.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:27:17 PM
What pride would have been hurt with my cases if you were town?

my town pride
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:28:02 PM
^ honestly i don't even know how that was a question, like only scum can have pride?? what?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:28:59 PM
honestly I just think Mitsuki is being pretentious right now, because her confirmation bias is intense to the point of no return. the only thing I can think of that'll make her change her mind is going to be my flip

going to repeat this for emphasis
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 11:33:25 PM
Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

... for some reason NNR's name on the wagon tag or whatever it's called wasn't green, and I've just realised about it.


Polaris, sorry for the poorly asked question. What I mean is why would your pride have been hurt like that if you were town.
It's not like it's the only point of my case, by the way.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 11:35:10 PM
Let's analyze what we have so far: the reasons given to say that my cases aren't valid are that 1- I haven't read properly, the style of my cases is bad, etc / 2- tunnel vision, other biases / 3- My identity is bad

So well, what does this say about how my cases are? Nothing. You could say all of this about anybody else (obviously changing some parts, like ?quotestrippy? to ?quoteless?), it'd contain no actual replies to the cases and it'd make it look like they're terrible.
It made my cases look like shit without actually saying anything about my thoughts.

Going to repeat for emphasis.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:40:28 PM
How does that make me scum?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:41:40 PM
because I thought I was being the shining light of town and you ruined that ;_;

and don't you dare spin that into a scummy "only scum care about looking town" because that is false, town enjoy being town just as much as scum do
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 08, 2013, 11:46:26 PM
because I thought I was being the shining light of town and you ruined that ;_;

... how? I literally only mentioned you as "I think he's scum too, but I have not as much conviction about it and I'm going to write my case later". I can see no such reaction against my cases and you not mentioning at all why I hadn't written the case on you or something  and blah blah blah if that was true.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 08, 2013, 11:51:03 PM
because i felt that your case on me was going to be as bad as the one on kilga so I figured I would say something about your case on kilga

either way my "hurt pride" is a horrible reason to think that I'm scum so please stop using it. and also answer my other question.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 11:54:45 PM
I was hoping you'd give me a name to make this less general, but okay, we'll do this the long way. Let's say it's one of DNA and Dormio (both chosen for a reason - let's see who figures that reason out by the end of this post!). Then the vote count looks like one of these:

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

---

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

How plausible do you think either of those scenarios is? That we had dual-town wagons, and not only were all three scum on the same wagon, but they were on the self-destructive vanilla townie's wagon? Do you really think scum would sit there on vanilla Shadowy and make no effort whatsoever to get unclaimed Kilga (someone that half the players in this game have spent time propping as the greatest player that ever lived)  to at least claim, if not outright lynched? It's not like they weren't there - all of Validon, Polaris, and DNA (and hell, even Sky Paladin) had posted less than an hour before Dormio hammered. Do you really think that NONE of them would at least fake sudden uncertainty and gutcheck over in my direction to try to draw a claim? The potential for major pressure was certainly there, with at least DNA proclaiming he hated me. But all of them stuck to Shadowy instesad of trying to put me at any risk whatsoever. How likely do you really think that is?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 08, 2013, 11:56:41 PM
I have literally five minutes before I am off on my epic katana-crafting journey.  And Blizzcon details are up!  I totally want to stick around and read but sword making is my childhood dream.  I'm like a twelve year old kid all over again. 

I had a read of the thread when I first got up and mulled over it while I was in the shower. 

I was surprised to not be dead.  I had expected Validon and (one other specific person~~~) to hop on to my lynch.  I guess I'm disappointed to be wrong again but happy to still be around. 

I decided to go with Mitsuki's read over Kilga's.  I don't have time to do an analysis until I get back from swordtown, around twelve hours from now. 

##Unvote
##Vote Polaris
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 08, 2013, 11:58:00 PM
I'm heading out to pick up my girlfriend and won't be back for another couple of hours, but I wanted to post the ~*~answer to the riddle~*~ in case people can't figure it out and start jonesin' to know while I'm gone.

ANSWER:
In this scenario, if Validon and Polaris are a scum team, then their buddy pretty much has to be Cheez, someone whom Mitsuki has said she doesn't see the case for.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 08, 2013, 11:59:44 PM
Sheesh, those colored vote counts. Talk about misleading.

If all three of Kilga, Mitsuki, and NNR are town after all, then they're accurate, but any two of those three could be scum and the third would have no way of knowing. That three players are townies is a kind of dangerous thing to assume, especially if it's all based on the words of one of them.

cut by- oh

uhh... Well, at least that's a solid reason to be suspicious of me there, Kilga.

Paladin what are you doing. Polaris is probably town. This is one of the only things I've let myself believe this entire game.

Cut a third time. Whoooo
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 12:01:06 AM
NO SPOILING THE RIDDLE >:|

kbbl
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 09, 2013, 12:01:52 AM
Alright, starting off with things, Cheez for the beginning of D1 spent a lot of time arguing with Dark. While I don't exactly trust Dark, all he did was just argue over Dark's opinions on things.

Quote
...Okay yeah, never mind. As much as there is to make me suspicious of Darkie, I really can't shake the feeling I get of a person who's just trying way too hard. Mostly in his earlier posts. Still not too sure what to think of him suddenly dropping the subject and making amends at the end, but that's really not enough to keep me convinced about my vote.

##Unvote

If you weren't even sure to begin with, then why bother with the entire case? It's just babbling that in the end means you aren't doing much else. Before then you yelled at Dormio for his earliest posts (which, come on, it was RVS, people can make posts like that, which is why I don't take them into consideration really), which... isn't much either.

Quote
Serela, dang it, you really sound like you're not town but your role makes it sound like there's not much else for you to be. Make up your mind (or just mess up more.)

Okay, that last sentence really bugs me. I think by the way the rest of the post this was from that statement in parenthesis was after Serela cut you, but why mention it...? You did a similar thing with a previous post where you were mentioning me not having an opinion yet and then pretty much went "(oh he still doesn't have one too bad)." It doesn't give me warm fuzzy feelings.

Quote
...wait, that's not a scumtell. That's what I'm doing too.


I can't believe I just now noticed this. Alright I'll go reconsider. I GUESS.

That unwillingness to get off like that REALLY urks me as well. It's like you're saying " WHOOPS I FAILED TO PIN A CASE ON HIM GOTTA DO SOMETHING ELSE NOW."

Quote
Well, here are the hunches I have, at any rate, even though I can't support most of them:

Darkie- Even though he's wrong, I have very little doubt that he's town.
Kilga- Bad vibes. Not sure why.
SB- Same bad vibes as Kilga.
Dormio- I still suspect him.

Yeah... I don't like the fact that you openly admit you can't support most of these. A read without support isn't a read, it's guts and guts aren't a good basis for a case.

Quote
Serela: A couple of legitimate arguments have been raised against him, as well as a couple of not-so-legitimate arguments. However, a good portion of the reason I have to not vote Serela right away comes from people who aren't Serela. Right now, I'm against the wagon for him, but at the same time seeing it go through wouldn't bother me too much.

So you didn't like the wagon yet... didn't mind if it went through. If that doesn't scream scum I don't know what does.

Quote from: Serela
Cheez quotes posts about me being confused why Kilga is being mad at me, and then says "nevermind I should vote Serela"

I don't get how that train of thought is supposed to work >_> Kilga misinterpreted something I said, proceeded to make accusations at me, I was really confused because I had no idea what he was talking about. How does that make me scum?

A quote from Serela that Cheez quoted, which sums up my opinion on Cheez's interaction with Serela up until now. That whole "I don't like the wagon buuuuut I don't care if it goes through so I'll vote it anyways" really bugs me. If you don't like a wagon, don't vote for it, simple as that.

Quote
There are totally other viable wagons but I'm not really that concerned about voting for yours.

Still urgh.

Quote
Mmmmm...

##Unvote
##Vote Shadoweh

At least because, if Serela's going to get lynched, there'd better be enough people voting WITHOUT Serela's help for that to happen.

So you unvoted and went to another suspicion of yours... because you thought it would only be fair for other people to jump on that wagon anyways? Sounds more like a "I'm getting off of this wagon so that I won't get dragged along with it!" attitude.

That's mostly it for D1. This post is so long already so I'm just going to separate this from the rest of my ISO on him, plus I'm going to be proactive and use my vote.

##Vote: Cheez8

Cuts everywhere, mostly stuff between Polaris and Mitsuki and Kilga explaining the votecount thing. It makes sense: Scum would want to try to see if Kilga could get lynched because they would probably want him gone. Yet the only people who waffled were Cheez. Sky_Paladin also said he wasn't really sure of the Shadoweh thing in the end, waffling at the last second. Of course, I'm suspecting Cheez more at the moment, so...

Cut again: Sky I'm still suspecting you but Cheez is more suspicious at the moment.

More cuts, please let me post.

SERIOUSLY WITH THE CUTS
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 09, 2013, 12:02:44 AM
cheez i'm so happy that you're saying that i'm town that i want to believe strongly in my heart that you aren't scum ;_;

and also because sky paladin's vote aggravates me to no end

I'm going to have to reread again but it's probably going to be another "is this bad because it's scummy or because it's newbtown" jamboree
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 09, 2013, 12:03:16 AM
Votecount 3.4

Cheez8 (3): Polaris, Kilgamayan, Validon98
Sky_Paladin (2): Dormio, Cheez8
Polaris (2): Mitsuki, Sky_Paladin
Kilgamayan (1): Darkninjaabc
Darkninjaabc (1): NekoNekoRex

It's 5 to lynch and 53 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)

SERIOUSLY WITH THE CUTS
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 09, 2013, 12:32:32 AM
Okay, now for D2 and D3 stuff.

Quote
I'm also secretly hoping Darkie says something incriminating beyond a doubt because he really does not inspire confidence as a townie. It'd be really convenient for him to slip up but sadly he can only really slip up and prove he's scum if he's scum and that's kind of a long shot.

This attitude on Dark really doesn't inspire confidence in you as a townie, particularly you saying it would be "convenient." Again, my opinion of Dark isn't that great, but your wording really looks like a scumslip to me.

Looking through most of the rest of his D2 stuff it was mostly wrangling with Dormio then going "oh better change mind LET'S GO TO KILGA BECAUSE MY BRAIN ISN'T HERE."  I also don't get why he like only barely mentions Shadoweh all things considered. I mean, he votes her at the end of D1, then like barely mentions her D2. I don't get the logic of this at all.

Most of his D3 stuff is just justification, justification, justification, a bit of talking with people but not much in the way of actual scumhunting in light of last night's flip.

Okay, nothing in D2 or D3 really changes my opinion. Still keeping my vote on Cheez.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 12:35:35 AM
How plausible do you think either of those scenarios is? That we had dual-town wagons, and not only were all three scum on the same wagon, but they were on the self-destructive vanilla townie's wagon? Do you really think scum would sit there on vanilla Shadowy and make no effort whatsoever to get unclaimed Kilga (someone that half the players in this game have spent time propping as the greatest player that ever lived)  to at least claim, if not outright lynched? It's not like they weren't there - all of Validon, Polaris, and DNA (and hell, even Sky Paladin) had posted less than an hour before Dormio hammered. Do you really think that NONE of them would at least fake sudden uncertainty and gutcheck over in my direction to try to draw a claim? The potential for major pressure was certainly there, with at least DNA proclaiming he hated me. But all of them stuck to Shadowy instesad of trying to put me at any risk whatsoever. How likely do you really think that is?

... I actually still think that you're scum, but even if you weren't yes, I doubt any of those people would try to get yourself killed just like that. It'd look so scummy if it worked, and they wouldn't risk it. And it wasn't going to happen anyways, so why risk it?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 12:43:25 AM
Paladin what are you doing. Polaris is probably town. This is one of the only things I've let myself believe this entire game.

What are the reasons you are townreading him?

By the way, the first game I played with Polaris (my first MotK game, actually, I can provide a link if you wish), I was TOTALLY townreading him and when he flipped scum I was so shocked. I'd never have thought someone with such an attitude could be scum. (His behaviour is different from then though, that's not my point)
That's part of why I don't like townreads much and I try to avoid them. It's fine as long as I have scumreads, and it certainly works better for me.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 12:46:39 AM
because i felt that your case on me was going to be as bad as the one on kilga so I figured I would say something about your case on kilga

either way my "hurt pride" is a horrible reason to think that I'm scum so please stop using it. and also answer my other question.

My case still stands even if you don't have that all in mind - painting cases as bad by fallacies and no actual reasoning is scummy by itself.
I can even go into what kind of fallacy each of your points is, if you want.

Answer the rest of my case before.


... Kilga, why do you want to convince me so much? (o_o) You can try to get other people to vote the people you want, you know. I doubt you'll make me change my opinion.


I didn't hit post after writing all of this? Why (@A@)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 12:53:49 AM
Sorry I hope I didn't spoil it

Anyway, from my perspective, the colored thing looks a little different:

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

Note that, for one, Sky Paladin isn't colored green on some whim. Why was Paladin even green in the first place?
The three blue names are the three involved in that "same alignment" stuff. All three could be town, or two of them could be scum.
If the case is that all of these people are town, then all of the members of the scumteam were voting for Shadoweh, which I wouldn't have too much trouble believing. Perhaps they avoided focusing on Kilga because they were worried it would lead to Kilga focusing on them?
If two of these three aren't town, though, that complicates matters. I see I've been cut by Validon though, and expanding on that right now would make this post take very long.

So, Validon...
Alright, starting off with things, Cheez for the beginning of D1 spent a lot of time arguing with Dark. While I don't exactly trust Dark, all he did was just argue over Dark's opinions on things.
...Your point? I had nothing else to do aside from joining in the RVS.

If you weren't even sure to begin with, then why bother with the entire case? It's just babbling that in the end means you aren't doing much else. Before then you yelled at Dormio for his earliest posts (which, come on, it was RVS, people can make posts like that, which is why I don't take them into consideration really), which... isn't much either.
Had I not bothered with the entire case (aka had a small discussion with him), I would not have drawn enough out of Darkie for me to establish an opinion on him. Are you seriously taking that earliest Dormio vote into account? That was me making a random baseless vote, coming up with some joke reason to put behind it, and presenting it as if I actually believed it. In other words, like you said, it was RVS.

Okay, that last sentence really bugs me. I think by the way the rest of the post this was from that statement in parenthesis was after Serela cut you, but why mention it...? You did a similar thing with a previous post where you were mentioning me not having an opinion yet and then pretty much went "(oh he still doesn't have one too bad)." It doesn't give me warm fuzzy feelings.
I'm not playing to give people warm fuzzy feelings. As for why I mentioned it, it was probably to let Serela know that I'm going to suspect him too if he doesn't shape up his act or something. I'm fairly certain several people have done the same to various people, including me.

That unwillingness to get off like that REALLY urks me as well. It's like you're saying " WHOOPS I FAILED TO PIN A CASE ON HIM GOTTA DO SOMETHING ELSE NOW."
Do something else? The first thing I did after this was to go back through Darkie's posts to see whether I well and truly believed he was scum. I don't see why that unwillingness should irk you. If anything, it should instill confidence. What if, instead, I had suddenly dropped all suspicion of Darkie and actually DID move on to something else, just like that? That sounds a lot scummier than what I did here, even when you try to make out what I did to be scummy. You're searching too hard, pal.

Yeah... I don't like the fact that you openly admit you can't support most of these. A read without support isn't a read, it's guts and guts aren't a good basis for a case.
Well, at least now I know what qualifies as a read. Thanks~
Once again, what would you prefer I do? Dredge up some BS reasoning before making mention of each of my hunches? I tried that several times and it didn't stop people from calling my cases unsupported.

So you didn't like the wagon yet... didn't mind if it went through. If that doesn't scream scum I don't know what does.

A quote from Serela that Cheez quoted, which sums up my opinion on Cheez's interaction with Serela up until now. That whole "I don't like the wagon buuuuut I don't care if it goes through so I'll vote it anyways" really bugs me. If you don't like a wagon, don't vote for it, simple as that.

Still urgh.
Yeah, "urgh" is right. Serela was a very unconvincing town read for me at that point. Serela said that after I completely misinterpreted something he said, so of course what I said didn't make any sense. And there's so little context to that last statement. I don't even recognize that line, so I don't know what you expect me to say about it.

So you unvoted and went to another suspicion of yours... because you thought it would only be fair for other people to jump on that wagon anyways? Sounds more like a "I'm getting off of this wagon so that I won't get dragged along with it!" attitude.
Serela voted himself. I didn't want Serela to be lynched if the town couldn't produce enough people to lynch Serela without his help.

I get that you think I'm scum and all but you're assuming I'm scum first and proving it second. You've pointed out several scumtells here that aren't scumtells at all, and from the sound of things you're just getting started, huh? Hey, how about a deal: Next time, don't refer to something as a scumtell if it isn't a scumtell. It'd make this a lot easier on me.

Cut by the D2&3 part, and it's only one quote long! Amazing!

Will you stop getting hung up on my wording? Coming from somebody who was at that point very conflicted as to whether somebody claiming to have a major power role was telling the truth or not, yes, Darkie somehow incriminating himself beyond a shadow of a doubt WOULD be very convenient in clearing up the immense amounts of doubt that were plaguing me.

At this point I'm willing to brush your argument to the side and get back to other business because it's laughably weak, even by my standards.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 09, 2013, 12:57:07 AM
I'm just here briefly to say that I've skimmed through Mitsuki's :words: and they sound stupid.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 01:03:16 AM
... I actually still think that you're scum, but even if you weren't yes, I doubt any of those people would try to get yourself killed just like that. It'd look so scummy if it worked, and they wouldn't risk it. And it wasn't going to happen anyways, so why risk it?

This is incredibly presumptuous.

- How is it risky? DNA, at the very least, could have switched his vote to me and no one would have thought anything it, since he suspected me. For the rest of them, Shadowy had finally started posting, and you had just put up a giant case against me for them to sheep to. (Plus people have been doing gutreads and not substantiating votes left and right this game.) Unvoting Shadowy while she was at L-2 and citing a desire to reread would have perfectly innocuous.

- How do you know it wasn't going to happen? I had three votes and DNA was a fourth waiting to happen. That would be enough to at least tie me at L-2 with the person I spent the entire day wanting dead and possibly drawn a role claim from me if I had something I thought could swing the lynch back Shadowy's way. It may still have ended in a Shadowy lynch, but it's free information for scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 09, 2013, 01:05:02 AM
Mitsuki, if you're going to implicate me for "painting your cases as bad" and nothing else and then use reverse process of elimination to clear everyone else as town (instead of clearing everyone else as town on their own merit) then that is the most stubborn thing I have ever seen. This is terrible town behavior and since we're both going to ignore each other's posts anyway I don't see the point in talking about this anymore, so I'll just end this immaturely so that you can get to be the better man.

You're such a weenie. Go back to Weenie Hut Jr.'s.

(Unless you're scum and I fell right into your trap of bad reasoning and stupid stubbornness which I secretly wish is the case because wooooooow)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 01:06:19 AM
Also you don't need to keep reminding me that you don't think I'm town, I'm fully aware of that. I've said once that we're assuming NNR's statement is true and that I must be town to you for the sake of this exercise. In fact, there is a second half to this exercise that covers the hypothetical possibilities where I'm scum and how someone in your position must then logically procee.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 01:09:55 AM
*proceed

Also also I'm doing this to both work you through what your reads logically imply (and get you on better track if you're town) and get a better read on you for myself (and find something to bring to bear against you if you're scum). I will say that your stubbornness to take part in an exercise that only helps your standing and your reads if you're town is not doing you a lot of favors on the latter half.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 01:10:44 AM
What are the reasons you are townreading him?
Part of it is based on his role, part of it is based on a lack of potentially scummy actions aside from his insistence on lynching best bud Serela back on Day 1. And that's only a potentially scummy action, not an actually scummy action. I could definitely see a townie acting that way, and it's not too much harder even when considering their roles. Also, Polly is just generally being reasonable.

I'm seriously considering both Validon and Paladin for being part of the scum team this time around. I think I said earlier that if that was the case Dormio would be the other member but I could see it being Darkie too.

Regardless of my indecision in other matters, my vote is staying on Paladin.

Also you don't need to keep reminding me that you don't think I'm town, I'm fully aware of that. I've said once that we're assuming NNR's statement is true and that I must be town to you for the sake of this exercise. In fact, there is a second half to this exercise that covers the hypothetical possibilities where I'm scum and how someone in your position must then logically procee.
Ooh, this sounds interesting.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 09, 2013, 01:22:59 AM
Comparing Sky Paladin and Cheez.

Sky Paladin: There's a lot of setup speculation plus some wishywashiness on voting. Based on wagon analysis alone, Sky Paladin unvoted the lynch wagon prior to the hammer and then voted back again (applies to both wagons). His vote on me is probably his worst yet, based only on sheeping Mitsuki. I kinda doubt he even took a look over my posts when he voted me, because he's only done process of elimination so far without any actual reading. (PoE is  kinda valid but you still have to look at the people themselves, you know :( ) On the other hand, his impromptu case on Shadoweh seemed fairly town-minded, but then again he might have done it for his own sake over wanting to lynch Shadoweh.

Cheez: I got the impression that he was doing a lot of thinking about the game seeing as he mentioned everything, but the problem is that his reads have been largely inconsistent so I'm really ??? Wagon analysis shows that Cheez avoided BOTH the wagons (as I mentioned earlier) in a very strange way, which is arguably a point for him being scum, though it can also be argued otherwise. In D3 I dunno if he has done any real scumhunting, because his Sky Paladin vote looks kind of appeasement-y to Dormio. I'd have to say Sky Paladin and Dormio being on the same scumreads list is a little strange.

Wow maybe both of them are scum. I voted Cheez first on gut so I think I'll leave it there for now but this is hard when both of them are newbies ;_;

Validon voting Cheez feels just a tad like sheeping but I should look at what he posted in more detail before singing mary had a little lamb.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 09, 2013, 01:36:04 AM
Hmm actually Validon's voting patterns might be a little sheepy in general. I don't know if I should find fault in that since Kilga is super charisma but I should keep that in mind. He got a little more proactive after he vented his feelings which is pretty good, but I dunno if I should just be judging on supposedly good intentions alone.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 02:01:42 AM
In D3 I dunno if he has done any real scumhunting, because his Sky Paladin vote looks kind of appeasement-y to Dormio. I'd have to say Sky Paladin and Dormio being on the same scumreads list is a little strange.
I don't really believe I've done much scumhunting this day that has actually established anything, no. I keep putting that off. ^^; And I agree, Paladin and Dormio being on the same list is extremely strange. There's absolutely no way the two of them could be on the same scumteam, as far as I'm concerned. That doesn't stop them from being my main two suspects right now.

My Paladin vote is in no way meant to be appeasement. No matter what, if Paladin flips I know I'll be reasonably safe in assuming Dormio is the opposite alignment, and vice versa, really. Of the two, Paladin looks more suspicious at the moment. That's why I want to vote for him. I truly believe he is worthy of suspicion.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 09, 2013, 02:16:25 AM
Urgh, I'm doing an RP now with people and tomorrow I'm going to be gone for most of the day, so I'll respond to cases and stuff then. Sorry if I'm suddenly disappearing like this, but other things call at the moment. >.<
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 1)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 03:21:51 AM
There are totally other viable wagons but I'm not really that concerned about voting for yours.
Guys! I finally found where Validon got this quote from! It's a miracle.

Apparently I was talking about Serela's wagon and used "concerned about" to mean "bothered by", and not "invested in" like I originally thought. It was about when it occurred to me that with Polaris believing so firmly that Serela was scum there'd be almost no way we could get both of them voting for the same person even if they both were town. If Serela and Polaris were both in the game today, and we had the same amount of townies and mafia remaining as we do now, two missing votes would be a really big deal. The town wouldn't even be able to form a majority without the help of either the Serela+Polaris team or a mafia vote. That's why I wasn't too concerned about voting Serela in light of Polly's total distrust.

I'm not sure why this is sufficient grounds for "still urgh" though. Or something more important, like, you know... a vote.

Sheesh, so many suspicious townies this game. I'm aware I'm not helping matters too, but man...
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 05:37:19 AM
Oh hey look I'm finally getting around to this. Going to bed once it's posted, though.

NK spec

Can't really address this much since it's NK spec, though I will say that I personally believe scum will roleblock a known problematic power role instead of roleblock-guessing at who might be a more problematic power role.

(one of the many posts encouraging Serela to play when he was getting lynched) and

Why would Kilga try to encourage his suspects to play if he was town and really thought they are scummy? I just get the feeling that he's frustrated scum because of everything being too easy to him when he actually wants to put effort and earn his victory.

And anyways, if he really wanted to see more content from them he'd be doing an entirely different thing, like asking them questions about their thoughts. There's also the fact that if he felt he hadn't seen enough from them he wouldn't be voting them with the reasons he's given. (o_o)

If I have a scumread on a townie, I want them to prove me wrong. This seems really, really obvious. Why would you NOT want your scumreads to show you that they're actually town if they're town? This is particularly true of D1 when I'm never really sure of anything.

And this is Kilga basically coaching his suspect yet again, but the part about the ?townie hand? is so fake that it made me stare at the screen in wonder.
Basic Psychology lessons, part 1: When people praise themselves just like that and out of context when there was no need to do so and it doesn't seem coherent with their personality, DOUBT THEM. It's obvious they want to reinforce a certain impression of themselves with that, and that's probably because they're lying or going to lie at some point.

I think this is an ESL issue. "Holding a townie hand through this process" isn't a reference to me, it's a reference to Serela. If he was town, I wanted him to show me (and everyone else) that the wagon on him was incorrect instead of giving up, but he wasn't giving me much reason to change my mind (see here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039448.html#msg1039448) for another example of this). Basically, the implication is that since I had to grab Serela's hand and drag him through the case-making process, he wasn't likely to be town, because if he was town I wouldn't need to take his (townie) hand a drag him through the case-making process.

Another thing I don't like is how he postpones voting Validon both D1 and D2 while still saying he's scummy. After dropping him he doesn't update his case on him either.I'd expect town to still elaborate on their other main suspect, or at least comment on something.
He actually just mentions Validon in one post after the D2 voteswitch:

Which basically just states that he keeps suspecting Validon.

Validon never gave me good reason to stop suspecting him. I tried to keep the case updated at least until the middle of Day 2 came, when my Shadowy tunnel coincided with the extra-busy portion of my week. I do not like that I haven't gone over Validon in-depth recently and know I need to find the time to do so.

Here he's not happy with Cheez voting Validon, but Cheez updated his reasoning on Dormio and thought Validon was scummier anyways, so I don't understant such a reaction.

I like original cases more than parrot cases, simple as that. :V Even when it's my case that's getting parroted, I want to see as much original effort as possible, otherwise I have to question your true scumhunting motivation. Cheez's Dormio's suspicion was an original idea while the Validon vote was a copy of what other players had put out.

Here he's defending Validon.

Untrue: I was attacking SB's reasoning for his Validon vote. See what I said some time ago about being right for shit reasons.

But that's not the only time he's discouraged votes on Validon:

This could be just a question, but it could still discourage a vote on Kilga's supposed second main suspect at that moment.

How was that question discouraging Validon votes? If anything it was encouraging a Validon vote, because I was calling Polaris's attention back to Validon after he had apparently forgotten about him, particular since Polaris said "I would like to see more posts with cases that are a bit stronger". If I had wanted to damage the propects of Validon votes I would have simply not reminded Polaris that Validon existed.

---

Unrelated to the above: I want everyone that hasn't already to weigh in on the votecount thing I discussed. The tl;dr version is that, if one accepts NNR's statement about Mitsuki and myself as true, then Cheez has to be scum by the way the End of Day 2 wagons shook down.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 07:04:42 AM
Oy.

Kilga, you've been barking up the wrong trees this entire game. The more I think about it, the more likely I find it that you're part of the scum team. Since you're apparently such a good player, as however many people seem to like to mention, I'd have thought you'd be on the right track at least once before Day 4 rolls around, but it doesn't look like that's going to happen.

To everybody who feels like reasoning: Assume, if you will, that I'm a townie. Not as in "don't lynch me", but simply for the sake of reasoning, assume I'm a townie, and progress from there. What changes about the votes' meaning? Am I still the only suspicious person who jumps on Kilga at the end of Day 2? Would the mafia really have a reason to want Kilga dead? I want you all to think these things through under the assumption that I'm a townie. You're going to have to sooner or later, so it might as well be sooner that you discover that Kilga's scenario isn't the only one to consider.

Anyway, I'll see you all in the morning.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 09, 2013, 08:00:53 AM
Basically I have no idea and no opportunity to do any kind of read or analysis because the whole time I am here my wife is here so I can't spend more than five minutes in front of the computer. 

I voted Polaris because I agree with Mitsuki's overall feeling.  It doesn't sound like she is making shit up.  Therefore I trust her.  In the absence of having my own good plans, that's why I'm going with her vote. 

I am suspicious of Kilga, and by implication, NNR's statement that Kilga and Mitsuki are the same team.  Kilga has said a lot of the time how they are such a great player but that doesn't mean a whole lot.  It's more interesting when other people say that you are a great player.  Something doesn't feel right but I don't have any time. 

I won't really get enough time to do any kind of analysis until much later this evening or tomorrow.  So far my net effort is to get Shadoweh lynched though so I'm not feeling too special. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 09, 2013, 09:32:55 AM
Votecount unchanged. 5 to lynch, 44 hours remaining.

Quote from: bars
Darkninjaabc - 632
Everyone else - 400
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 09, 2013, 11:15:52 AM
For your record. I have been off to some competition where you debate.


I read through all of this briefly and skimmed walls. I feel that its going to help more to check stances and how they contradict eachother.

This is the second time mafia for me but this really is bull. I have yet to score anything with a supposely super helpful ability. We can at least confirm someones alignment already. I am kind of pissed off at scum. And shadowy must die.

I am trying to read the entire thread again since now we actually has a significant enough chunk of super trustworthy info.

Dormio is too neutral and is scum. Maintaining null till d3 has to be deliberate.
Cheez8 is scum. I had my hunches because he said he was new and such. Its not like i dont have my doubts now but i wont sheep for him if nothing more convicting is brought up
Validon is pressed as scum but i dont agree since i basically have to go absent due to irl.
This also explains why i think  mistsupx is town slot.
Nnr is scum. Gutread more than anything really. Hes looking null through friggin d3. Usual scum trick.
The hardest thing to do is to townread kilga. I assumed with how quickly and decisively he cyvled through stances with a huge amount of dedication that it looks scunplay. I see his arguments as merely filling in the holes when he already had the conclusion. What i will say after looking at his effort that hes town pr. He basically engaged in reverse psychology with scum n2 and dared them to shoot him. As with what scum did with sb. Its obvious  scum likr killing towns to make associative scumreads. Kilga docced himself. Hence explain why i failed my na.
Yes i am deciding to trust kilga for the time being.
And i will download every fucking th game if you turn out to be scum
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 11:20:51 AM
Do I really have to stand people saying that my cases are terrible without actually pointing out why? Sigh.
At least Kilga answered. Thank you.

Can't really address this much since it's NK spec, though I will say that I personally believe scum will roleblock a known problematic power role instead of roleblock-guessing at who might be a more problematic power role.

... what I meant was not just that, I said that scum would try to kill either you or Dark.

If I have a scumread on a townie, I want them to prove me wrong. This seems really, really obvious. Why would you NOT want your scumreads to show you that they're actually town if they're town? This is particularly true of D1 when I'm never really sure of anything.

I want my scumreads to answer to me properly and such, but encouraging them to form another wagon is something that I wouldn't even think of telling them to do. What's the point, anyways? It's not like a player trying to form another wagon on request is going to prove if they're town or not. And then you discouraged Serela's opinion on Polaris being scum because he wasn't getting lynched. I remember, and that's one of the actual parts of my cases I never got into.
All of that and the overall tone made me think what I thought.

Validon never gave me good reason to stop suspecting him. I tried to keep the case updated at least until the middle of Day 2 came, when my Shadowy tunnel coincided with the extra-busy portion of my week. I do not like that I haven't gone over Validon in-depth recently and know I need to find the time to do so.

Ok, but Validon is probably the only lynch we're both supporting so it's extra important to update your case on him.
Although I should reconsider him myself (>_<)



Dark, docs can't usually target themselves. I think you were just roleblocked again.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 11:22:28 AM
Openly saying that cases are bad without giving any actual reason is scummy, by the way.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 11:24:07 AM
Could you at least properly reply to them? (=_=;
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 11:25:22 AM
Note that, for one, Sky Paladin isn't colored green on some whim. Why was Paladin even green in the first place?

I coloured him green because I'm almost sure abou him being town. I said why on my posts.
I had a question for you I'd like you to answer: why do you think Polaris is town?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 11:40:01 AM
By the way, it seems a lot of people think that I stop considering other players just because of my scumreads, and it's not like that. I still think about them, but there's nothing that makes me want to go and vote them, like what happened with Shadoweh.
If I directly stopped considering them I'd be townreading them. But notice that I'm just doing that with Paladin (I'm still considering NNR and Kilga being scumbuddies somehow, so I'm not stopping considering NNR after all).

If someone wants me to ISO someone else, tell me and I'll do it. If you want me to give an opinion about a certain thing, tell me and I'll do it. Even if you tell me to ISO a townread, I'll do it and give you my opinion.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 09, 2013, 12:33:10 PM
OK, I've got a small window! 

I want to talk about NNR/Mitsuki/Kilga. 

NNR said something to the effect of:  Kilga and Mitsuki are the same faction.  Therefore we are assuming:  NNR is telling the truth, and that his information is correct. 

So let's go with that when we go into the vote analysis that Kilga asked for. 

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB
Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

I am assuming I am town, naturally.  I didn't color anybody red though.  I just put in the greens as based off of assuming NNR is town, and therefore he has given the truth about his information. 

The question was:

Kilga
Quote
How plausible do you think either of those scenarios is? That we had dual-town wagons, and not only were all three scum on the same wagon, but they were on the self-destructive vanilla townie's wagon? Do you really think scum would sit there on vanilla Shadowy and make no effort whatsoever to get unclaimed Kilga (someone that half the players in this game have spent time propping as the greatest player that ever lived)  to at least claim, if not outright lynched?

I am assuming there are three scums. 

As we see it, two known townies voted to lynch Kilga.  There is only one name that's not confirmed.  Therefore, two unknown scums must have voted for Shadoweh.  That's Validon, Polaris, DNA, and Dormio. 
Today, DNA is pushing for a Kilga lynch, largely unsupported.  If the scums wanted to lynch Kilga, I think they would have had their chance yesterday.  Only Mitsuki made a case about it.  This was the scum chance.  Why didn't they do it?

A couple of reasons I can think of. 
#1 - They planned to kill Kilga off at night, and since Shadoweh wasn't one of theirs, there was no reason to risk all pilevoting at once. 
#2 - They were too scared to lynch Kilga because there wasn't enough town votes to hide amongst. 

I think in both of these scnenarios, Cheez8 is probably town. 
Following up on it:  If scum killed off either Kilga or Mitsuki tonight, naturally the one killed will appear as town.  Therefore we can assume the other one is town, if NNR is telling the truth. 

Let's look at the situation where NNR is telling a fib. 

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB
Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

I assumed Mitsuki is town and Kilga is scum in this scenario because NNR posted the information to deflate Mitsuki's pressure on Kilga

In this scenario, why didn't the scum lynch Kilga?  Of course, it's because, they don't want to kill their own man.  I would also then green out the person Kilga is trying to lynch today (Cheez) because scums already used one ploy to try to validate Kilga (using NNR). Lynching their own teammate to buy more trust isn't necessary. 

Your last red is one of Validon, Polaris, DNA and Dormio.  In this story; DNA's pursuit of Kilga is a bit more murky.  But I wanna tip Dormio as red because he and NNR voted for me together earlier, AND they both voted for Shadoweh. 

The follow up of this is:  If scum killed off Mitsuki tonight, and town bought NNR's story, they would assume Kilga must be town - when he would in fact be a scum.  That would allow both NNR and Kilga to basically sneak into the 'accepted as town' group. 

Then we have option 3...NNR told a lie but Mitsuki is the scum.  I've also taken the liberty of coloring Mitsuki's (and my) target green. 

Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB
Not Voting (1): Kilgamayan

In this scenario, scum wanted Kilga to NOT die on night 2 and for there to be some credible reason for us to think that he was targetted night 2 (note the lack of deaths).  NNR could then say "hey Kilga and Mitsuki are the same faction" and then whoever the doc is would go "hmm, I covered Kilga last night and nobody died = therefore he must be the one that was hit!" - in this scenario, there's no need to kill Kilga at night, and they pretty much guaranteed the doc would be wasted on Kilga for the rest of the game.  You know, unless Kilga actually is the doc, which would be hilarious.  Also. this scenario's premise - that NNR is scum - also raises some question marks, because NNR's statement came in to put pause to Mitsuki's challenges on Kilga.  It would be working at cross-purposes.  While I can see scum arguing against each other to buy town favor I can't see them actually blocking each other like this. 

Therefore, I think we can discount scenario 3.  In my two other scenarios, Mitsuki is town (even if NNR is not).  Previously I went along with Mitsuki because what she wrote felt right.  But now I'm also pretty damn sure she's town, even though I'm not sure of Kilga and NNR. 

I think that Mitsuki will be targetted tonight and want the doc to cover her. 
Scum shouldn't hit NNR, because scum know if he dies, we will know the truth of his claim, and therefore be able to use scenario 1 - Kilga and Mitsuki are both town.  I think the likelihood of NNR being target-lost is unreasonable, so if he is telling the truth, I think the information is credible. 
I also don't think we should lynch NNR at this point because if he is town, he can give us useful information in the future.  If he is scum, eventually his information will become contradicted.  So if NNR is lying, it's only good for another phase or two. 

So I want to consider scenario 2 as plausible, but scenario 1 is most likely (NNR is telling the truth, Kilga is town, Mitsuki is town). 

In scenario 1, there are at least two scums voting for Shadoweh.  That's two out of Polaris, Validon, DNA and Dormio.  Technically I'm an option, but I know I'm not scum ^_~  Of those four, Dormio reads the most scummy to me.  There's also a chance that Cheez8 is scum. 
In scenario 2, there are STILL two scums voting for Shadoweh.  There's NNR, and one of Polaris, Validon, DNA and Dormio.  Dormio still reads scummy.  Cheez8 gets cleared because Kilga's trying to kill him. 

There's also a scenario 4;;;NNR is scum and therefore knows Mitsuki and Kilga are both town, and just picked them to try and make NNR appear as town.  This is only really useful if NNR got killed off because then town would seriously suspect Kilga and Mitsuki.  Therefore, I think it's very unlikely as it's hard to use effectively. 

Well that's all the analysis time I get.  I blew it out a lot longer than 25 minutes ^___^  My vote is on Polaris for now.  I'm gonna go for now and see what tomorrow brings. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Mitsuki on November 09, 2013, 12:34:37 PM
@ Mod: requesting replacement (also, please send me the graveyard QT)

Sorry guys, but I definitely can't handle both mafia and my IRL situation. My flatmates have insulted me  and my other flatmate and one of them has even pushed me. The flat's owner doesn't want to have anything to do with this all because they're her friends. They're becoming more passive-agressive day by day. I have to leave this place as soon as I can. (u_u)

My cases are totally the best though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 09, 2013, 12:46:12 PM
Wow, I'm really shocked!  Good luck and I hope you find someplace good and safe.  Well, at least whoever comes into your slot will get my thumbs up :)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 09, 2013, 12:57:02 PM
Sky. How are you helpibg town.
You are explainin gin detail and wifoming everyone into scumreads. Its like my current opinion on how messed up this game is but worse in that you are actually trying to persuade people.

The only concrete thing we have from you is tgat tou are town and cheez shoule be too but if hes scum you wont be responsible.

I feel what you are doing is just sidetrackiny town and to stir up crap.

Might have to actually read your prev psts
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 09, 2013, 01:22:41 PM
Dark, did you even...never mind. 

If you are pushing Kilga, you can't ignore NNR's statement about his alignment with Mitsuki.  If Kilga is scum, then NNR very likely is too.  Please consider that in the greater scope of your analysis. 

If you trust NNR, then pushing for Kilga is just gosh darn illogical. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 09, 2013, 01:35:18 PM
I do not trust nnr by exxlusion but what i say is that we cannot afford another mistake now.

I am saying nnr with his null stance is scummy. What did nnr even say that makes you think hes so right and trustworthy. He went around parading on everyone including me so i remember that well.

In a nutshell i trust more what is modinfo. We see the vote analysis which us great. But why cant scum be all on a wagon. And why must i keep pushing kilgq. I suggested now i am not confident in my read on him. I dobt want to throw this game so i an droppin git now. We can akways lybch him later.

Stop being distrcting and force me to clarify the obviousz
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 01:47:52 PM
Hey, PX, you should sub back into your slot. >_> Gonna response to the response regardless, as much as it may be moot now.

Kilga has said a lot of the time how they are such a great player

[citation needed]

Do I really have to stand people saying that my cases are terrible without actually pointing out why? Sigh.

Welcome to the club of everyone that has ever made a case on Shadowy! :D The orientation is tomorrow.

... what I meant was not just that, I said that scum would try to kill either you or Dark.

Well, scum in the N1 situation had no reason to kill DNA if they had a roleblocker handy. They would likely also then realize a doctor could easily come to the same conclusion, protect me, and decide to kill someone else.

I want my scumreads to answer to me properly and such, but encouraging them to form another wagon is something that I wouldn't even think of telling them to do. What's the point, anyways? It's not like a player trying to form another wagon on request is going to prove if they're town or not. And then you discouraged Serela's opinion on Polaris being scum because he wasn't getting lynched. I remember, and that's one of the actual parts of my cases I never got into.
All of that and the overall tone made me think what I thought.

It's not just the attempt to form a wagon, it's seeing the reasoning behind whatever case is made. If the attempt at a case is garbage, they're more likely to be scum. If the attempt at a case is actually thought through and reasonable, they're more likely to be town.

I will have some time later today between commitments to give mid-D2-to-now Validon a look-through, but unfortunately, that time is not now.

---

Unrelated to the above: I want everyone that hasn't already to weigh in on the votecount thing I discussed. The tl;dr version is that, if one accepts NNR's statement about Mitsuki and myself as true, then Cheez has to be scum by the way the End of Day 2 wagons shook down.

Reposting this for emphasis. Sky Paladin, in your assessment of this situation, you claim you believe both possible scenarios have Cheez as "likely town". Please directly address #831 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041785.html#msg1041785). Don't just throw out stuff like "it's too risky for scum!" Tell us WHY having even just one member of the scum team move over to me to try to get me to claim is "too risky".

I think this is what a lot of people aren't getting when they look at that votecount assessment. I'm not saying the entire scumteam would flop over from Shadowy to me with no explanation whatsoever. I am saying that the situation presented to an alleged scumteam of some three-person combination of Dormio, Polaris, Sky Paladin, DNA, Validon - Mitsuki's large case against me and Shadowy actually finally trying - an incredibly valid opportunity to at least try to pressure me to claim. Why was this not done, assuming that same scumteam? If you think just one person moving their vote to me was "too risky", tell me exactly why, because there was absolutely zero risk involved for DNA (who had just stated a healthy distaste for me) and near-zero risk involved for the rest of them (easy to look like Shadowy's sudden effort and Mitsuki's case made them rethink their stances).
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 03:42:06 PM
I think this is what a lot of people aren't getting when they look at that votecount assessment. I'm not saying the entire scumteam would flop over from Shadowy to me with no explanation whatsoever. I am saying that the situation presented to an alleged scumteam of some three-person combination of Dormio, Polaris, Sky Paladin, DNA, Validon - Mitsuki's large case against me and Shadowy actually finally trying - an incredibly valid opportunity to at least try to pressure me to claim. Why was this not done, assuming that same scumteam? If you think just one person moving their vote to me was "too risky", tell me exactly why, because there was absolutely zero risk involved for DNA (who had just stated a healthy distaste for me) and near-zero risk involved for the rest of them (easy to look like Shadowy's sudden effort and Mitsuki's case made them rethink their stances).
If you're part of the scumteam, it would be "too risky" because they'd have nothing to gain from it at all.

Failing that... Well, it's hard to say. It's even harder to say when you consider me, a third townie, chiming in to pressure you even more. The only two options I can think of are either that the scum team didn't consider the possibility in time, or that the scumteam already had one of their people voting for you (specifically, Mitsuki.) I don't think that last option is too "out there" either- who says they had to wait until the pressure was already on to chime in? Why not create that pressure themselves?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 09, 2013, 04:20:41 PM
DNA
Quote
What did nnr even say that makes you think hes so right and trustworthy.

The post about NNR that I am referring to is this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041394.html#msg1041394).  His next post basically confirms he used some kind of role ability to confirm this.  This is no minor detail, so when you posted this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041560.html#msg1041560) it raised a lot of eyebrows.  Come to think of it, now that I've had some sleep and actually had time to read it, what you're saying is kind of wow.  Also, seeing as a posted a scenario that supports your suspicion against NNR and Kilga, I'm a little surprised you didn't give it more weight. 

Kilga
Quote
[citation needed]
Here's the most recent (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041767.html#msg1041767) example.  There's more but I don't have time to go through the whole thread.  Mitsuki also called you on it earlier in day 3 iirc. 

Kilga
Quote
Reposting this for emphasis. Sky Paladin, in your assessment of this situation, you claim you believe both possible scenarios have Cheez as "likely town". Please directly address #831. Don't just throw out stuff like "it's too risky for scum!" Tell us WHY having even just one member of the scum team move over to me to try to get me to claim is "too risky".

In part it is because I'm not familiar with the detective role in this forum.  In Megatokyo, the detective can (during the day phase) find out how many scum voted for one particular player.  There is also no hammer, only the player with the most votes dies at phase end (so you can be lynched with 1 vote).  Not saying this is better, just different.  So, it was plausible to lynch inactives because the easiest way for scum to hide was to simply not vote and therefore can't get caught in the detective net. 

I don't know if there's a role like that in this game.  If there is, then splitting the votes, some for Shadoweh, some for you, is a smart move.  If they all voted for Shadoweh and Shadoweh's tally was check, we could go bam, three scums voted for Shadoweh, everybody else is town.  If that role exists, Cheez8 or Mitsuki is scum, and with NNR's evidence, it's Cheez8.  I can't argue against it. 

The risk I saw is implied in your post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041785.html#msg1041785).  In the day 2 lynch, we had Mitsuki, Shadoweh, and Cheez8 voting for you.  Scum knew Shadoweh would flip town.  (They didn't know, though, that NNR would make his post about you and Mitsuki the next day).  Assuming Cheez8 was town, and all three scums voted for you, it'd be Mitsuki, Cheeze, +3 scums.  That's five votes.  Could they have got a sixth?  It depends.  DNA might have voted for you.  Unless DNA and Cheeze are both scum.  In which case, they could only ever get Mitsuki, Cheeze, DNA, and one more for only four votes total.  They couldn't get a lynch on you over Shadoweh, because Shadoweh would get Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Dormio (DNA is not in this tally because he would vote for Kilga).  Finally, Kilga would get home five minutes later and vote for Shadoweh, for a five-five lynch split.  It would then be up to SB to randomly vote for Kilga or Shadoweh, or for one more town to switch. 

If they wanted to lynch you, it would be difficult.  They would have to make solid posts that would be scrutinised heavily.  Hell, I thought I put up an awesome tell for Shadoweh and look how it worked out for me.  I think it was too dangerous to push for your lynch, especially whey they didn't have anything to specifically gain from it.  EG if Shadoweh was scum and they were trying to save a scumbuddy, sure, push for you.  But in the choice between one towny or another towny, there's no reason for scum to stick their neck out to save any particular one or to kill of a specific person.  The public didn't know you or Shadoweh's role (Shadoweh claimed vanilla towny of course, but I never believe vanilla towny) so there was no STRATEGIC reason to push for you over Shadoweh.  That was the risk I saw.  It was too hard to push for your lynch, for the whole team to try to lynch you. 

The second side of this - the most obvious reason - is if that you were scum, of course they wouldn't lynch you~  But I think we are assuming that NNR told the truth at this stage, so that's why I'm looking at 'scenario 1' more than scenario 2.  I want scenario 2 considered, though, so we don't run off a bridge. 

But after all that, I have to admit I'm stumped.  I don't have a good reason why only one scum WOULDN'T vote for you.  Sure, I think DNA could vote for you, even if he's town.  So they'd get...Mitsuki, Shadoweh, Cheez8, DNA.  Four votes.  They needed two more.  If DNA was scum, then they could only get five.  If DNA is town and didn't vote you, they still could only get five. 

I guess the last point I could make is that there might not have been anybody in the scum team who felt credible enough to ask you to claim. 

So to sum up my points:  They didn't push for you because it was too difficult to pull off.  But I don't have a good response to: "Tell us WHY having even just one member of the scum team move over to me to try to get me to claim is "too risky"."  Hell, I can't even argue against "Why having even just one member of the scum team move over" :/ :/ splitting up votes is a good way to avoid associative reads. 

I've just gone and re-looked at my scenario's post. 

Perhaps scum ran out of time, like Cheez8 said in his cut ^_~  In which case, DNA might have been preparing to voteswitch.  But Shadoweh wanted you dead too, so. 

I don't know.  I can't argue why Cheez8 ISNT scum for voting you.  I only have enough scope for the whole scum team voting one way or the other.  I guess it makes sense that one of them voted for you to avoid association with the rest of the team. 

##Unvote
##Vote Cheez8


I agree with your reads that for the most part Cheez8 isn't contributing a whole lot.  However, I feel like I am trying hard but people like Dormio keep saying I'm not doing anything. 

This is really my last post I think for the phase; I'll get to check the tallies tomorrow morning but I'll be out of town most of the day.  I need to do a big reread of the whole thread - I just blurred over some stuff in the middle because of huge wall of text. There's never enough time. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 05:51:25 PM
I dunno why anyone would think I would gambit false information to softclear TWO of my gut scumreads. I'm not going to pull out my crumbs just to appease two scum trying to spread doubt on my role.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 05:55:18 PM
Paladin reads as scum who is trying to avoid Death by PoE, with his comprehensive scenarios involving me lying.

Dark has either absolutely no idea what is going on or is just newbscum trying to point at many fingers as possible.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 06:03:52 PM
Actually I might have to take the former back on grounds the offending post was part of Kilga's excercise, but I still am irked that Sky is the one to do it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 06:04:34 PM
Does anyone else find Dark to be scummy or at the very least incredulous for not properly reading the game?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 06:34:23 PM
Since you bring it up, I think this is a good time for me to call attention to one of Darkie's posts (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038594.html#msg1038594) that I found sitting around in one of my tabs. Let's read a couple things from that post of his.
Quote
I seriously do not believe either validon nor serela wagon will be scum.
...
That said, I fully support lynching Serela, claim is weird and his way of sidetracking from what's the important thing (reads) in his posts goes :V . Scummier vibe.

##Vote Serela
Now, I can see where a townie could make this post, and how maybe, maybe the logic behind these statements could be coherent and innocent, just phrased a little strangely. However, let's scroll down to the next post, which is also his...
Quote
Null: polaris, kilga, serela, sb, px
He thinks Serela is a null read. Okay. That's stretching it a bit, but if Serela's a null read giving off scummy vibes, these posts can still line up. But what's this? Three posts down, in his next post...
Quote
And my vote on Serela is genuinely because I believe that he's scummy.
Well, that changed fast! Starting off with seriously believing Serela is not scum but voting for him despite that, then going straight to seriously believing that Serela is scum within a few posts. That just feels strange to me. Strange in a "somebody told me that there's no way my reasoning for voting Serela will fly so I'm going to switch to better reasoning and hope people will pay more attention to that" way. And here, I can only imagine one case where there's somebody around to tell him that.

This is certainly not the only reason I can come up with for why Darkie's potentially suspicious, but it's the only one I have on hand at the time. Picking through the rest of his posts and trying to differentiate between bad logic and scummy logic would be quite the daunting task.

I know Darkie's also somebody I said I had some level of confidence in, but there were two other things about that: One, I only had enough confidence in him that I said I'd wait until Day 3 to start humoring the possibility that he's lying, and two, the main post that made me think "Yeah, Darkie's totally town" came from Sky Paladin. Now that Sky Paladin is emerging as a suspect as well, I'm a little less confident in his reason given for Darkie's innocence.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 06:44:29 PM
Quote
I am saying nnr with his null stance is scummy. What did nnr even say
 that makes you think hes so right and trustworthy. He went around parading on everyone including me so i remember that well.
I read everyone because that's kind of a requirement when I sub in. Do remember I have town reads as well as scum reads. My claim is trustworthy because I don't have any good reason to reverse two gutreads, make up a claim with a known rolecop in play, and because I have a bunch of crumbs. Trying to get one player off a scumbuddy's back by making up a completely arbitrary and vague fakeclaim is an expensive waste of information.

In fact the information I got was based on Mitsuki's massive jumping on Kilga, because I knew if they both were the same alignment, there could be no way they're both scum.

I could also cite a bunch of setup reasons why me lying would be really improbable, but Paladin's thoughts pretty well sum it up. If I'm scum, I have to keep putting out results and risking something screwing up.

-cut

Quote
Picking through the rest of his posts and trying to differentiate between bad logic and scummy logic would be quite the daunting task.
To be fair, I think this is one of the core challenges of trying to find scum in a Mafia game. There's always a possibility of a townie fucking up and getting lynched for it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 09, 2013, 06:48:00 PM
Votecount 3.5

Cheez8 (4): Polaris, Kilgamayan, Validon98, Sky_Paladin
Sky_Paladin (2): Dormio, Cheez8
Polaris (1): Mitsuki
Kilgamayan (1): Darkninjaabc
Darkninjaabc (1): NekoNekoRex

It's 5 to lynch and 34 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 06:49:36 PM
Dark's posts so far have either been contradictory, uninformed, or a load of bullshit, though. I go back to this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041643.html#msg1041643) to hilight exactly how bad his posts are. No scumread should be based on "x is scum because there wasn't a kill last night"
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 06:51:35 PM
Actually I might just claim anyway since everyone seems to have figured out exactly what my role does at this point, or at least I've probably implied it really heavily, just so I can release my crumbs and make my statement rock-solid.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 07:04:02 PM
To be fair, I think this is one of the core challenges of trying to find scum in a Mafia game. There's always a possibility of a townie fucking up and getting lynched for it.
Good point. It just seems more difficult and time consuming in Darkie's particular case.

Might as well claim, I suppose. You're at least partway there already, so clearing up details sounds like a good idea.

I seem to be at L-1. I should pay more attention.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 07:39:18 PM
NNR PLEASE READ THIS AND RESPOND

Unrelated to the above: I want everyone that hasn't already to weigh in on the votecount thing I discussed. The tl;dr version is that, if one accepts NNR's statement about Mitsuki and myself as true, then Cheez has to be scum by the way the End of Day 2 wagons shook down.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 07:40:15 PM
Some thoughts on the game, since I seem to be running out of time to provide them.

I'm not too bothered by being lynched at this point. All I was focusing on this entire game was helping reveal the truth to the town. As a result, I kind of ignored how I appeared to the town. It would be nice if I could help you guys see the truth without getting lynched, but if my existence in this game is an obstacle to that at this point, I can accept it. Careful though, guys! You're all cutting it real close. Mafia will be one member short of a majority soon, and if they get it, it's game over.

The main reason I ignored how I was coming across so much, and why I'm not too distressed at being mislynched, is because I'm merely a vanilla townie. Sadly, I have nothing but my opinions and my vote to provide.


Darkie should no longer be considered a confirmed townie, assuming he ever was during this game. It's possible that another mafia member advised him to go out and have another big discussion Day 1 so that he could be a "confirmed townie" like he was in the last game, except my willingness to acknowledge his point of view kind of screwed that up for him. Plus, if he fakeclaimed a rolecop on Day 1, he could get away with not producing any results for the rest of the game (or at least until more people started revealing roles, but seeing as this is a fairly vanilla game we're playing, it's likely that there aren't too many town power roles for people to reveal to begin with.)

There's still very little definite about anybody in my eyes, which mainly owes to the fact that I'm seeing roughly half of the remaining players in one group and the other half in another group, and I have a couple potential scumteams in each of the groups.

If Sky Paladin is scum, it makes it much more likely for Darkie to be scum, and much less likely for Dormio to be scum. If Sky Paladin and Darkie are both scum, it makes it incredibly unlikely for NNR, Kilga, or Mitsuki to be the remaining member. This leaves Polaris and Validon. Of those two, I think Validon is much more likely to be scum.

Darkie being scum does not say as much about Paladin's alignment as Paladin being scum says about Darkie's alignment.

If Sky Paladin is not scum, it has no bearing on Darkie's alignment, and it makes it more likely for either Dormio or Kilga to be scum. For some reason, I keep reading Dormio and Kilga together.

I have not given as much thought to scenarios in which Sky Paladin is not scum, but I'll try and leave something.

If Sky Paladin is not scum, and NNR/Mitsuki/Kilga are all town, then Polaris, Dormio, Darkie, and Validon remain. I would imagine Dormio would be most likely to be scum in this case, and am uncertain about the others.

If two out of NNR/Mitsuki/Kilga are scum... honestly, the third member really depends on which two are scum, and even then there are several possibilities.


That's more or less how I see it. First hunch for scumteam is Paladin, Darkie, and Validon, after that it's [Kilga/NNR/Mitsuki], [Kilga/NNR/Mitsuki], [someone else]. That's kind of lame though. I might churn up some opinions on the Kilga/NNR/Mitsuki possibilities if I have time and I feel like it would be at all useful, but that may not happen.

That's everything I can think of that I have to say. I'm ready to be lynched now, provided you all step up your game something fierce afterwards. I'll still be around and doing what I can to help, but I won't be shocked if I'm lynched before long. As long as it'll help clear up confusion, I'm willing to accept that.


GYARGH
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 09, 2013, 10:16:52 PM
BBM replaces Mitsuki.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 09, 2013, 10:20:33 PM
Well, the RP I did last night was amazing, and the thing I did today (which was a high school level quiz competition) went okay, despite the fact that I only had one hour of sleep last night. As such I am really tired.
Looking at what's happened I see a little more back and forth between Mitsuki and Kilga, which would raise some flags in my head but Mitsuki left her vote on Polaris so the point's somewhat moot in my mind. The reason it would raise flags is that, if NNR is telling the truth, the two of them if they were both town would get off each other's backs, which they sort of seem to have done but I'm not entirely sure. However, if they were both scum, they could claim NNR is lying, continue to fight each other, and then probably later on "make up" and join on another wagon to drive a mislynch.
Of course, I haven't entirely trusted NNR's claim. He could be lying to A- protect both of them, B- protect one of the two of them, C- make town suppose both of them are scum. Of course, it is hard for me to imagine Kilga as scum still, so perhaps he is on a scumteam with Mitsuki? I'm not sure, but seeing as she's replacing out I'll have to wait for what the new person is going to have to say (also, I'm sorry to hear that stuff about you, Mitsuki. I hope things work out! ^^;).
I don't think I have anything to add to the "Cheez is scum based off of ED2" thing, because I already looked at it before and the case makes sense. In general I don't have much to add except to say this to Cheez: The thing with this game is that you have to be careful with your wording as both town and scum. As town, you have to write things in ways that don't make you seem scummy while knowing that you indeed aren't scum. Scum has to do the same with the knowledge that they are scum. I recommend trying to pay attention to how you appear to town, because honestly the way you have appeared hasn't looked too towny from what I've seen.
If anyone wants something from me, don't hesitate to ask, but I'm tired and don't feel much like making anymore long walls of text today.

Cut: Oh hey BBM.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 09, 2013, 10:38:20 PM
Hullo. I haven't been paying attention to this game at all, so it'll take me a while to catch up.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 09, 2013, 10:42:51 PM
Validon: I still haven't had the chance to read you over, but I see a fair amount of wishywashyness in that post.

- Do you think NNR is telling the truth or lying? Why?
- If you think NNR is telling the truth, are Mitsuki and I town or scum? Why?
- If you think NNR is lying, do you think Mitsuki and/or myself are scum? Why?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 10:46:26 PM
In general I don't have much to add except to say this to Cheez: The thing with this game is that you have to be careful with your wording as both town and scum. As town, you have to write things in ways that don't make you seem scummy while knowing that you indeed aren't scum. Scum has to do the same with the knowledge that they are scum. I recommend trying to pay attention to how you appear to town, because honestly the way you have appeared hasn't looked too towny from what I've seen.
Yes, yes... I've learned this quite thoroughly this game. At first, since I was only a vanilla townie, I figured it would be fine for me to stick my neck out like I did, but... Simply being a vanilla townie doesn't mean somebody's expendable. Lose too many vanilla townies and the mafia start to close in on the majority. No matter what role I get in the next game I join, I'll pay more attention to how I act.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 10:47:25 PM
Quote
Unrelated to the above: I want everyone that hasn't already to weigh in on the votecount thing I discussed. The tl;dr version is that, if one accepts NNR's statement about Mitsuki and myself as true, then Cheez has to be scum by the way the End of Day 2 wagons shook down.
'm not good at votecount shenanigans. I know that when I play scum, I just find the scummiest player and peruse them (although I tend to cut my buddies some slack). I don't tend to participate in moving votes for stategery or the like.

As far as Cheez goes, I'm not too convinced he's scum by virtue of perusing Kilga, although I'd need to reread the casework on that. I DO have reasons to suspect Cheez, mostly the fact he didn't have a vote down until late D2, or much in the way of reads.

Ah, I'll come back to this in a sec
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 09, 2013, 11:07:31 PM
My neck hurts a lot.
I guess I slept in a really awkward position last night.

Anyway.
Like I said yesterday, I think Mitsuki's posts are kind of dumb and I'm ignoring them since Kilga is super awesome and I don't have a reason to disbelieve NNR.

Also, the more recent Kilga suspicion looks horribly forced(?) to me.
I mean Mitsuki was basically all like "Kilga, because gut!" and then a bunch of other people joined in going "Yeah! Kilga! Because he doesn't look right!".
That kind of thing.
I dunno.

My neck hurts really hurts so I'm going to do some neck exercises and then lie down except I won't do the lying down part because I have other things that I want to do.

Warning - while you were typing 6 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Huh.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 11:17:16 PM
Ah, I'd rather not claim at the sole request of the probably-to-be-lynched fellow today, but I suppose I'll claim tomorrow if nobody else needs to know.

...Ah, the more I read into these Mitsuki vs Kilga posts the more I think they're town. I just don't see scum!Mitsuki continuing to attack Kilga,  but paranoid-town!Mitsuki could have reason to believe Kilga is a godfather or something, or that I'm a liar.

Read up on the votecount thing and still not really seeing the Cheez connection here beyond arbitrary speculation, but I still attribute that to my playstyle making it hard to connect the dots.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 09, 2013, 11:26:16 PM
I just don undersrand what this fuss is about.

I find nnr scummy in his lurking playstyle helel facing into full throttle. So i am less inclined to trust him.
i never realized he claimed "some kin dof role ability". Because i kind of used all my limited time durimg thr past two days on conflicting between kilga. Paladin and generally skimming through things.
I am completely confused. Yes. And i basically have to type at 20wpm with two fingers. I just try to state who i find acummy. Vote for the scums. And point out tgr scumtatic. Thats it. I am nit even inclined to doublecheck because motk phone mode ha strouble scrolling. More often than not it eata my post when i scroll as i hit the wrong button

I didnt really see nnr claim. But dammit because theres so many walls and blip posters in this game. It is technically impossible for me really to read everything and weigh their values. I believe i even asked for a replacement becausr i wasnt sure if i could handle all these. But ky busy times are over.

I just want to win.  If you tell me dark, you fucked up everything. Look at this this an dthis. I will do it. Another mislynch and we in mylo or lylo. At this point i dont even know what to look at. I am blessed with a role and scum screwed it. What the fuck should i do at this point?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 11:28:24 PM
MY claim was the first post of D2, it's kind of hard to miss :V
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 11:29:57 PM
I didn't read D1 but what warranted you to claim anyway?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 09, 2013, 11:36:27 PM
Oh, I see, you got piledrived for making really stupid posts ("let's lynch the null read lol"), plus "I support Serela lynch entirely based on his claim despite thinking his posting isn't scummy"

Yeah, I would have lynched you too
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 09, 2013, 11:58:48 PM
i never realized he claimed "some kin dof role ability". Because i kind of used all my limited time durimg thr past two days on conflicting between kilga. Paladin and generally skimming through things.
If you were paying any attention to anything involving Kilga, you'd have realized that in roughly half of Kilga's everybody's posts this day people mention NNR's claim that Kilga and Mitsuki are the same alignment. This has been extremely important information and there's no way you could have missed it this entire time unless...

...
I'm stumped.
There's no way you could have missed it this entire time.
Where the heck did you think the idea that Kilga and Mitsuki were on the same team came from, anyway?

I just want to win.  If you tell me dark, you fucked up everything. Look at this this an dthis. I will do it. Another mislynch and we in mylo or lylo. At this point i dont even know what to look at. I am blessed with a role and scum screwed it. What the fuck should i do at this point?
The scum team didn't screw you out of making use of your role. You did that yourself when you felt the need to announce it to the scum team in the middle of D1. They had no incentive to send their roleblocker after any particular player until you did that.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 12:04:10 AM
(also I have no advice on what you should do now other than try to lynch somebody more suspicious than me, such as Sky Paladin)
(you aren't hoping somebody will advise you to vote for me in order to have an excuse to hammer me without looking bad, are you? I hope not)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 12:31:45 AM
##Unvote

I need to reassess the situation.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 10, 2013, 12:36:40 AM
Validon: I still haven't had the chance to read you over, but I see a fair amount of wishywashyness in that post.

- Do you think NNR is telling the truth or lying? Why?
- If you think NNR is telling the truth, are Mitsuki and I town or scum? Why?
- If you think NNR is lying, do you think Mitsuki and/or myself are scum? Why?

1- At the moment I am not particularly sure, but if I were to decide I would say I lean more towards trusting him, for the reason that his posts have been more trustworthy than the people I have been suspecting.
2- If he is telling the truth, then I would tend to think you two are town. You particularly have been one of my stronger townreads, simply because your logic, your accusations, everything just screams "this is a guy who wants to lynch scum." Mitsuki I had less faith in, but I did not see anything particularly scummy in her posts.

I'm sure this question is going to be asked later, but you might be wondering why I wrote that stuff, and it was mainly because I was thinking out loud. It's not wrong to trust roleclaims, I just didn't want to simply say "okay, this must be a true claim" without thinking. Of course, after thinking, I don't see a reason why I shouldn't at least for now, trust it.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 01:24:02 AM
##Vote Sky Paladin

I'm going to do this for now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 10, 2013, 01:53:08 AM
Well, I'm at the end of N1. Haven't read past that yet, but these are some reads as of right now:

DNA: Probably town on tone. His logic is terrible but he has that tone to his posts where he seriously can't understand why people don't agree with him that I think comes more often from town.

Validon: I think he's scum. Most of his content involved talking about how people needed to talk more when he himself had only two posts making scumhunting attempts. I think a post SB made at some point about it sums it up pretty well. His first two posts were really wordy and had no reads, and then his next few were just saying that he'd have content later. Then his DNA vote was bad because it was just saying DNA's logic was bad rather than actually scummy (I think Kilga made this criticism). Then he drops that for a Serela vote due to no content. I really don't like it because he drops his suspicion around the same time others are, and then votes Serela around the same time others are, even though he didn't previously vote Polaris or SB or Dormio for low content when he called them out on it. This is especially bad IMO because later he says he expects low activity from Serela, but had higher standards from the others. So why is it scummier for Serela to do it than the others? I know the comment was because SB was pushing him for not calling out Serela for low content, but still. Also even though he says he still "has his eye" on DNA, his next post is ragging on SB for sticking to his guns about that. Also in the same sentence he calls the DNA wagon "not 100% bad" and dumb.  My top D1 scumread, though I'll wait to finish reading the thread before dropping a vote on anyone. He also kept talking about how Polaris/Serela's roles made him think that they were ITP or something, which I didn't like.

Kilga: I thought he was townie for most of the day but some of his content about Serela left a weird taste in my mouth. Like near the end he kept pushing Serela to scumhunt, which is fair enough. But then Serela replied that he was attacking Shadoweh and Kilga replied to push harder for others to vote Shadoweh over him. I mean, what exactly do you want him to do? It felt kind of unfair. Also at some point I remember him saying something like "Shadoweh represented pretty accurately why I'm still voting Serela" except AFAICR Shadoweh was defending Serela for most of the phase? And IIRC he even made a point about that.

Dormio: He felt pretty forgettable. Can't remember anything he did D1 other than being really wordy in RVS about nothing much.

Anyways, gonna take a break for now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 10, 2013, 01:58:47 AM
Also, just saw Polaris's vote above my post- Polaris, how does your voting work with Serela dead? Is it normal now or does it vote do nothing at all with Serela incapable of voting with you?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 02:06:11 AM
It's normal :V You should just read the rest of the game to see it in action!
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 10, 2013, 05:01:49 AM
Here's the most recent (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041767.html#msg1041767) example.  There's more but I don't have time to go through the whole thread.  Mitsuki also called you on it earlier in day 3 iirc.

That is a link to a post where I say that a lot of other players in this game have called me a great player (which is true and I would scour the thread for links if I had the time right now). It is not a quote where I call myself a great player. Please try again. I want exact quotes where I'm propping myself up because I know for a fact that I never seriously put myself on a pedestal in-game.

Kilga: I thought he was townie for most of the day but some of his content about Serela left a weird taste in my mouth. Like near the end he kept pushing Serela to scumhunt, which is fair enough. But then Serela replied that he was attacking Shadoweh and Kilga replied to push harder for others to vote Shadoweh over him. I mean, what exactly do you want him to do? It felt kind of unfair.

I don't think I'm parsing this correctly. I was being unfair by pushing Serela to scumhunt and try to get people to agree with him (on a person I was also voting)? >_> I wanted him, if he was town, to push a case on someone he thought was scum, so he'd have a chance of saving himself, which is exactly what I encouraged. Can you explain this further?

Also at some point I remember him saying something like "Shadoweh represented pretty accurately why I'm still voting Serela" except AFAICR Shadoweh was defending Serela for most of the phase? And IIRC he even made a point about that.

Looks like you're thinking of #384 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039393.html#msg1039393). My comment about Shadowy properly pointing out Serela's scumminess was a reference to #359 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039363.html#msg1039363), in which I thought Shadowy was pretty clearly pointing out behaviour she found scummy. I agreed with this point because it is not an uncommon psychological scumslip for scum to address a townie with a tone that heavily implies an assumption of towniness in a situation where the scum would have little/no reason to assume such a thing were they town. It's basically an accidental overplay of scum's extra knowledge.

Polaris, if you're going to change your vote away from Cheez, I want to hear your assessment of the color-coded vote counts.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 05:34:50 AM
I highly doubt that Cheez switched to you with the motive of "forcing you to claim" because I think that's an incredibly uncommon and advanced thought process that I would find few people to be capable of (myself included). Normally it would be a bit bizarre to have all three scum on the same wagon but it's not too incredible in this specific situation with the way the wagons (or wagon, singular) happened and the general experience of the players involved.

Then again, there are other reasons why Cheez could have avoided the major wagon, perhaps to dissociate from his other scumbuddies or avoid taking responsibility for lynching town (which he had prior knowledge of).

hold on i'm in a pokemon battle right now so i can't concentrate on this post anymore so i'll just post it like this
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 10, 2013, 06:02:18 AM
At the end of D2. Wow, you guys need to read this game: http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=36597 on how to break open a role that can't give info about why they're voting someone. Highly disappointed in SB since he was in that game.

@Kilga- Well, by being unfair, I meant that Serela was already voting Shadoweh and had said why he thought she was scummy- what more was he supposed to do? Tell people to vote her in every post he made? But I changed my mind on you anyways. I've been in the position of obvtown scum before and if that was you this game I don't think that you would keep bringing attention to the fact that you didn't die at the beginning of D2.

My read on Validon is unchanged. He barely did anything D2 other than sheep an easy Shadoweh case. He begins the day with a look at SP's posts that talks about how they have a lot of not-relevant stuff in them. Except all the posts he links to are from RVS or just after RVS ends, with no attempt to look at all his posts in the latter 48 hours of the phase, where he was actually posting content. He also talks about how he still feels kind of iffy about DNA even though others think he's townie- which is bad because on D1 he pushed SB for not agreeing with the rest of the game on DNA (which is something scummy on its own that I forgot to mention in my last post- not agreeing with the majority of the game isn't scummy). And then again later he implies that PX is scummy for not agreeing with the Shadoweh case. I mean, I agree that PX should have given reasons for his opinion, but why is having an unpopular opinion scummy? Also he admits that he started with CF7 for his ISOs because it was easy and then gets mad when Polaris calls him out for that?  ???

Sky is mostly OK but two things really pinged me. Firstly, near the end of D1 he voted Serela, partially using the reasoning that he didn't think that both Serela and Polaris could be town. Yet there's no mention of this on D2 and no follow-up on Polaris on D2 at all. Secondly, I really didn't like both that post and one near the beginning of D2 for how waffly they were about Serela, and apologizing for it. I need to ISO him but I can't really remember any conviction in any of his reads.

Dormio- Still forgettable. I think he just was voting Sky the whole time?

Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 10, 2013, 06:11:59 AM
Votecount 3.6

Cheez8 (3): Kilgamayan, Validon98, Sky_Paladin
Sky_Paladin (3): Dormio, Cheez8, Polaris
Polaris (1): BigBangMeteor
Kilgamayan (1): Darkninjaabc
Darkninjaabc (1): NekoNekoRex

It's 5 to lynch and 23 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 10, 2013, 06:57:33 AM
Isnt it bbm now
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 10, 2013, 07:18:29 AM
Don't have anything new to say, other then the fact I find it very hard to believe Dark didn't notice something which has been a topic of conversation throughout the entire day.

Not really sure why people are ignoring him. He may be clueless but his logic is also the worst ever, no comparison.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 10, 2013, 07:19:07 AM
I mean last game he was at least remotely sensible but it feels like he's throwing crap to see what sticks here.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 10, 2013, 10:17:51 AM
You are just being outright unreasonable.

I am having a very hard time playing this game. I stated such and i know my logix isnt the best. Keep on attacking what i cant defend against is also irritating. I did it. Theres that. I explained it in terms of how busy i am. You hold a complete disregard of that an dkept on bein gloud and obnoxious.

If anything i dont even want to trust you anymore. This is such a rage inducing game.

##Vote: nnr

That is l1 scum. If you cant stop harassing others and be an annoying prick it couldve went better for your so called persuing the mosy scummy player in the form of spewing crap which literally made no sense. I am town and least i could do is to vote scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 10, 2013, 02:00:49 PM
Nvm about l1 thing. More of me misreading names in a hurry
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 10, 2013, 02:29:53 PM
Polaris: You missed the point entirely. The vote count analysis actually has nothing to do with Cheez's potential motives in switching at all. The idea instead is to assume TownCheez and then demonstrate how utterly absurd the resulting play was. Once one removes the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be true, yes? I simply refuse to believe a scumteam composed of three of those five unknowns would look at a large Mitsuki case against me and three townie votes against me and not try to take advantage of it in some capacity. It's not even really high-level play - if someone that a sizeable chunk of the game has a very high opinion of (in before Sky Paladin, I'm not calling myself really good in this post either, I'm pointing out how other people in this game have called me really good) is in trouble, providing some further riskless pressure can't possibly end badly. Since a TownCheez scenario is ludicrous to the point of impossibility, he must be scum.

BBM: I only started pushing Serela to push Shadowy after he voted for himself, because that was about the point where my patience with himn wore really thin.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 10, 2013, 02:40:53 PM
Ok, I've finally got the time I need to do a big read.  I've been posting all over the place because I couldn't string two thoughts together in between work and being out of town.  But now, I have time.  Let's go!

I'm still going to clear NNR in my mind at the moment because I think there's no reason for him to lie.  It's too dangerous.  If anybody that he picks turns out to be scum, then the whole 'network' will be scum, and if he keeps picking 'safe' targets, people will question him about it.  However, there's the chance that NNR's information was wrong, and he's presenting it honestly.  Mitsuki suggested maybe Kilga is Godfather, which is some kind of role that appears as town, I believe.  Or there is some other class using a 'make target appear as town'.  It's not a bad idea for scum to keep disguising Kilga as he's a good target for a detective check.  With NNR out, he might also buy off sabotage's from DNA.  However, then we have two detective-type roles.  Is that unusual for this amount of players?  We already know this is a high proportion of vanilla towny games.  I expected one doctor, one detective, one vig, one or two specials (SB being one of them) with the rest being vanilla and some scums. 

So I want to put in pencil:  A reason that Cheez8 is not scum is if Kilga is scum; and all the scums were voting Shadoweh to try to save Kilga. 

Next point. 

Dormio voted for Shadoweh with the salad...rp...thing.  Not really important.  So, what did he actually do? 
First, he voted for Serela in D1.  Then a few posts later, finally posts his reason (http://). 
Dormio's next content post is http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038887.html#msg1038887 (http://) actually just a play-by-play, with nothing new actually posted.  Then there's this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038999.html#msg1038999) where Dormio accuses Serela of doing no scum-hunting, when in fact Dormio is in the same boat. 
Then there's http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039308.html#msg1039308 (http://) this which says nothing.  Also, maybe a scumtell?  It took Dormio over an hour to write a post about nothing, according to '11 new replies' and timestamp comparison. 
Then, this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039329.html#msg1039329) where an additional 14 posts magically appeared for your three sentence post.  That means it took you half an hour to make that post and TWO OF THE POSTS WERE FROM DORMIO.  A little chronologically confused, imo. 
It looks like Dormio is not only putting in no effort but they are trying to fake it to look like they are putting in more than they really are. 
There's nothing of consequence out of Dormio right up until the end of the phase.  His net effort was to vote for Serela seemingly randomly early in the day, add in some reasoning later, then not change his vote. 

Day 2. 
Dormio starts off voting for me based on this post. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039899.html#msg1039899)
I've made my position clear on this a number of times, so it's annoying to be deliberately misrepresented. 
Point 1 - Who arbitrarily decided it was no longer RVS time?  Actually, it was Dormio (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038416.html#msg1038416), who, only a few hours earlier, had been posting about brussel sprouts along with me and, not incidentally, pushing for a lynch on Shadoweh. 
Point 2 - Dormio decided that RVS had ended (and posted about it on day 1), and then linked back to it in day 2 to say "Hey Sky was still doing RVS at the end of RVS".  So providing 'evidence' that they had arbitrarily created and putting forth as the new truth is the Dormio play style?  OK :D 
Then there's this 'Sky just posted fluff' comment.  Bullshit.  I explained WHY my vote was RVS, and also that I had put in a serious vote since then.  I posted a preliminary scumreading.  At this point, Dormio had not done anything except vote for Serela and Sky.  I actually responded to Dormio's post, here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039957.html#msg1039957).  What's his response? 

Well actually, he did pick up this -
Quote
I dunno. Sky Palladium demonstrated competence and a willingness to abuse newbmeta last game.
  People assumed I was newb.  I felt no reason to disprove this, if it meant I could avoid some unjustified suspicion.  But his actual response to my defence was a single throw away line here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040162.html#msg1040162), where he talked about living in Australia.  No attempt to back up his point or rebuke mine.  But...there's no vote change.  He semi-reads Cheez8 but doesn't say anything in particular, or change his vote. 

There's another play-by-play (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040528.html#msg1040528) here that ignores my defense and just reiterates Dormio's vague arguments earlier.  I can't see a town ignoring a valid defence.  A towny should have attacked my defense or accepted it - and amended their vote accordingly.  Not ignored it entirely.  That's a scum play. 

Here's a counterargument against http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040533.html#msg1040533 (http://) Cheez8.  It's relevant because I'm going to posit that Cheez8 and Dormio are scums together.  Although Dormio ignored my response, he went into detail with this one for no apparent reason; he even says at the end 'back to making words about Shadoweh'.  But at this point, he was still voting for me

This post (http://) is the first bit of actual scumhunting Dormio has done.  There's this:
Quote
So, it's like, why is she trying to throw Cheez8 a clear for noticing something with the flavour?
I dunno, it just reads as being super off to me.
This may or may not be related to my Cheez8 suspicions.
in regards to Shadoweh missing my point about the not-vighit, that Cheez8 picked up, and then Shadoweh quoted.  That was an alarm bell for a lot of people. 
It's clear here that Dormio is 'suspecting' Cheez8, but not doing anything about it.  There's some back and forth between Cheez8 and Dormio but Dormio doesn't really talk to Shadoweh at any point. 

Then Dormio vanishes until hammer time and then hammers. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041060.html#msg1041060)  There's no thought process or any mention of reasoning on how he suddenly switched from Sky to Cheez8 (the more credible target) and then Shadoweh.  Just bam, you're dead. 

Day 3!  The very next thing Dormio does is vote for me again (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041498.html#msg1041498).  No mention of the hammer business.  But once again, Dormio pays a huge amount of attention to what Cheez8 says, and pretty much ignores my defence.  He actually says "Sky_Paladin is too clean" so I must be scum.  That makes no sense.  It's also wrong.  As I've said...many times...I'm not sorry for Serela.  I am sorry for Shadoweh.  Stop ignoring what I wrote except for when it suits you.  What's you're actual case against me? 

Once again, Dormio quotes and argues against Cheez8 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041502.html#msg1041502), but where's the vote?  Still on Sky.
Why?  Because I believe Dormio wants to make a case of disassociating from Cheez8 if one of them is caught.  Which is difficult now, because, both Cheez8 and Dormio are voting for Sky, despite Dormio constantly attacking Cheez8 and basically ignoring what Sky said.  Actually, he continues to refer to his own made up conclusions as if they were evidence. 

Dormio next appears to say Mitsuki is stupid (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041783.html#msg1041783) without clarifying why.  Perhaps because she's accusing the last potential scumbuddy, Polaris.  Who is also, not incidentally, voting for me.  Dormio reappears again to reiterate that he thinks Mitsuki is http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042114.html#msg1042114 (http://) dumb without any proof, just arbitrarily 'I think Mitsuki's posts are kind of dumb and I'm ignoring them since Kilga is super awesome and I don't have a reason to disbelieve NNR.'  Mitsuki wasn't attacking NNR.  She was pursuing Polaris.  What's the association between Polaris and Cheez8 at this time?  None, except for the one Dormio has in his mind. 

Polaris then votes for me based on, well, no reason I can see.  But he did post this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042221.html#msg1042221) after voting for me. 

Quote
I highly doubt that Cheez switched to you with the motive of "forcing you to claim" because I think that's an incredibly uncommon and advanced thought process that I would find few people to be capable of (myself included). Normally it would be a bit bizarre to have all three scum on the same wagon but it's not too incredible in this specific situation with the way the wagons (or wagon, singular) happened and the general experience of the players involved.

Then again, there are other reasons why Cheez could have avoided the major wagon, perhaps to dissociate from his other scumbuddies or avoid taking responsibility for lynching town (which he had prior knowledge of).

hold on i'm in a pokemon battle right now so i can't concentrate on this post anymore so i'll just post it like this

Once again showing the lack of thought and arbitrary targetting that has been the hallmark of this scum team. 

And that's it, I'm done on this post. 

Your scums are Cheez8, Polaris, and Dormio.  The evidence is based on Dormio's scummy play (noted above), and involving/supporting only his teammates. 

Please vote accordingly. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 10, 2013, 02:42:39 PM
Next point:  DNA, there's a good reason to believe that NNR is telling the truth, because it's too dangerous for him to get away with lying about such a role for more than a phase or two. 
We can't be sure about Kilga based on purely the evidence NNR posted. 
But I feel confident enough about the other scums, that I'm willing to handwave almost everybody else - yes, you too - as town. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 10, 2013, 02:52:06 PM
Repost and bold for emphasis. 

Your scums are Cheez8, Polaris, and Dormio.

The evidence is based largely around Dormio's behaviour, lack of scumreading, hypocritical behaviour, some possible scumslips, and association with Polaris and Cheez8.  For Polaris' part, apathetic involvement in topics except for immediate defense, both players poor criticism/ignorance of Mitsuki's targetting of Polaris, and ultimately, the fact that all three are voting for me for no apparent reason.  It's not a coincidence. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 10, 2013, 03:25:02 PM
Alright. Sorry for my outburst. I am tldr more pissed at myself at being derp than nnr play now that i had some food and time to mull my thoughts.

I will be sleeping in an hour or so. And will decide on parking my vote then.

While its not like i am threatening nnr with my vote but anyway

##Unvote
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 04:04:06 PM
Aww, man. Why would you put me on a scumteam with Dormio? That'd be like me putting you on a scumteam with Dormio (and roughly the same reasoning would work, too.)

You have some good points in there, but him responding to me when I type up big bulky cases against him makes sense for any two players, regardless of either of their alignments. If I wanted to, I could say that you're on a scumteam with him because he rested his vote on you for so long. Will I say that? No, because that doesn't make enough sense. What makes you think that suspecting me because Dormio paid attention to me when I suspected him makes any more sense?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 10, 2013, 04:25:16 PM
I put you on the scum team for two reasons. 

One - Dormio told me you were scum when he only paid attention to the things you and I were saying, but despite attacking you for specific reasons, only voted for me with vague reasons. 
Two - Kilga told me you were scum because of the way you voted day 2, combined with NNR and Mitsuki's points. 
Three - You told me you were scum when you voted for me, along with Dormio, despite arguing with Dormio during day 1 and 2 about each other being scummy. 

But I guess you could try to convince town you weren't scum by helping to lynch one of your scumbuddies.  I'd start with Dormio seeing as it's his fault. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 04:29:24 PM
Fair enough. I'd prefer to do so when my vote would count as a reasonable contribution, though. As I said earlier, you and Dormio are the two people I'm suspecting the most, and right now it seems you and I are the only ones who would support a Dormio lynch. In order for me to switch my vote from you to Dormio, I'll need to see proof that my vote won't be wasted there.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 04:35:50 PM
(Yes I know I went for completely not-viable votes earlier in the game but at those points I couldn't come up with a better place for my vote since I didn't particularly support lynching the people other people supported lynching.)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 10, 2013, 04:37:18 PM
Well, time for me to go to bed.  If there's still a phase when I get up, I'll go ISO Cheez8 and Polaris just incase I missed up.  I'll vote for anyone of those three. 

Cheez8, seeing as we're both at 3 votes and I am going to bed *right now*, you'll understand if I don't switch my vote.  But if there's your name and atleast one other under Dormio tomorrow, I'll switch mine. 

If we go to night phase while I'm asleep I don't think I'll get another post. 

So good luck and good hunting. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 10, 2013, 04:44:21 PM
Alright. Cheez. Sorry. But in the end i decided to park my vote on you.

I am actually assuming things now. I will be accepting for now nnr osnt lying. And therefore the analysis that cheez has to be scum stands.

And then i factored in the time. Last game was literally lost because of a shitty gambit town bought. We ended up killing someone out of the picture.

What i see now is simple really. Theres a very good chance cheez is scum. And the associative reas which can be deprived will basically out the entirw acumteam. Therefore my vote is clear.

##Vote: Cheez8
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 04:45:16 PM
Cheez8, seeing as we're both at 3 votes and I am going to bed *right now*, you'll understand if I don't switch my vote.  But if there's your name and atleast one other under Dormio tomorrow, I'll switch mine.
Dang it, that's what I meant!

...So. Thoughts on Dormio, everyone?

cut by oh
excuse me while I prepare to disprove your logic
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 10, 2013, 04:57:31 PM
Votecount 3.7

Cheez8 (4): Kilgamayan, Validon98, Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc
Sky_Paladin (3): Dormio, Cheez8, Polaris
Polaris (1): BigBangMeteor
Darkninjaabc (1): NekoNekoRex

It's 5 to lynch and 12 hours remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 05:03:00 PM
nice to know sky paladin is trying to call the scum team without having properly looked at 2/3 of the people he is accusing.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 05:30:16 PM
taking a closer look now that i'm on my computer. i still don't understand the town logic that made sky paladin decide to make a case on dormio without even looking at cheez first, who is the person he is voting. it looks more like he came up with the conclusion first (dormio = scum) and then went from there, adding cheez to the team because his vote was already there and adding me to the team because i was voting him. if i had to make a wild guess i'd say sky paladin and dormio are scum bussing each other but there isn't much evidence for that so i'll just throw it out there as something to consider `_`

re: kilga, i respectfully disagree that town!cheez is an impossibility, and that i will judge cheez on his own merit as opposed to lame wagon analysis
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Kilgamayan on November 10, 2013, 05:32:31 PM
Can you substantiate why you think this way?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 05:40:22 PM
I am actually assuming things now. I will be accepting for now nnr osnt lying. And therefore the analysis that cheez has to be scum stands.
That analysis does not stand. While I would prefer not to rule out the possibility of NNR lying, for the sake of debating your reasoning, I will assume that he is telling the truth for the time being. Even better, I'll assume that both BBM and Kilga are town.

I'll be kind and assume (for now) that you're town too, since if you are a townie, there's no reason for you to accept any reasoning that involves you being scum. In that case, five players remain: Validon, Paladin, Polaris, Dormio, and me. Since it's the crux of most of the arguments today, I'll go back and pick up those votecounts.

Serela (7): Dormio, Validon98, Polaris, Darkninjaabc, PX BBM, Serela, Sky_Paladin
Darkninjaabc (2): CF7 NekoNekoRex, SB
Shadoweh (2): Kilgamayan, Cheez8,
CF7 NekoNekoRex (1): Shadoweh

Oh, whoops! That's Serela's, isn't it? My bad. We were supposed to be ignoring that one. Here:
Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris, NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3): Mitsuki BBM, Shadoweh, Cheez8
NekoNekoRex (1): SB

(Note: Only Darkie should be putting any trust in these colors right now. There are far too many assumptions made here for the sake of the argument for them to be trustworthy otherwise.)

What's this? All four of the other people went with the big wagons of the day the other times? My word! That's almost suspicious. But, look. Here we have little Cheez, voting for somebody else both times. How odd! Clearly, the only explanation is that, since he's scum, he knew both of them would be town and voted somebody else to avoid being suspicious. Right?

...Let me ask you something. You people keep saying I did this to avoid suspicion...
Validon voted for the major wagon both days.
Polaris voted for the major wagon both days.
Dormio voted for the major wagon both days.
Paladin voted for the major wagon both days.
And you, Darkie, voted for the major wagon both days.

How much suspicion has been created for any of you simply for voting for the major wagons? If I wanted to avoid suspicion, I could have just voted for the major wagons both days. Five other people did the same thing, so even if the entire scum team and I participated in this, and suspicion was cast upon the people who went with both of the major wagons, the scum players had three other suspects to hide behind and cast suspicion on. There was not nearly as much risk associated with sheeping those wagons as people want to make you all believe. In fact, I would probably have attracted less suspicion had I simply left my vote on Serela instead of removing it out of a mix between justice and indignity when he voted for himself.

But Cheez, you say, if you aren't a member of the scum team, what reason could you possibly have for not voting for the wagons as well?
Well, imaginary question-asker, perhaps I was a townie who didn't have sufficient reasons to vote for them? After all, according to the assumptions made here, there are at least three other players who fit that bill. Why aren't you suspecting them for not voting the major wagons?
Because, Cheez, that would be completely illogical!
I see, imaginary question-asker! So, why are you suspecting me for not voting the major wagons?
That's a mighty good question, Cheez! I hereby realize that I am either being thoroughly hoodwinked or among those doing the hoodwinking. It makes absolutely no sense for me to suspect you for not sheeping the major wagons when you could have done so and garnered less suspicion than the amount of suspicion you are under now. It seems to be entirely possible that you are a member of the town, even when these unconfirmed assumptions are taken into account. This is also a sufficient explanation as to why a member of the town would think to vote for Kilga at the end of Day 2.
Why, thank you, imaginary question-asker. I thoroughly appreciate the way you stopped being unreasonable.


Quote
What i see now is simple really. Theres a very good chance cheez is scum. And the associative reas which can be deprived will basically out the entirw acumteam. Therefore my vote is clear.
Oh? Please, explain my associative reads. If I remember correctly, back on Day 1 my associative reads proved that the scumteam was, beyond doubt, a team of me, Serela, and Shadoweh. Do tell, what are my associative reads now?


...Hmm. This post is pretty heavy on the sarcasm. I hope this hasn't offended you or anybody else, and I am genuinely sorry if it did.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 05:54:42 PM
honestly anyone switching from shadoweh to kilga would just look weird as hell. i doubt that it can be considered "riskless pressure" since a person going from voting shadoweh to voting kilga would basically be going against his relatively safe views on shadoweh to sheeping mitsuki, which..... well, doesn't that just look stupid to you?

not to mention, the dormiohammer took place less than 15 minutes after cheez's vote kilga vote, so i doubt scum even had a chance to think "oh 3 votes on kilga, better pressure him" before the day was done and over with.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 06:03:01 PM
i'm just saying that vote count analysis alone is not enough to prove cheez scum, so tbh i'm just bored with kilga trying to push it in everyone's faces when he could be pushing the case he wrote on cheez instead.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 06:05:54 PM
'm not good at votecount shenanigans. I know that when I play scum, I just find the scummiest player and peruse them (although I tend to cut my buddies some slack). I don't tend to participate in moving votes for stategery or the like.

nnr explained it better than i could `_`
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: DNAbc on November 10, 2013, 06:09:38 PM
I wont change my vote when i am tired as hell now and cant thunk properly.

I am sorry but theres that.

If imo you told me why lynching someone else can reveal more info to town at this point i might think more. But what i see is another actiondan style panic coaster by polaria and you.

Good night and good hunt
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 06:12:04 PM
realized that i've been thinking "sky paladin vs. cheez" for a while now but i don't know if anything denies the possibility that they might both be scum
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 10, 2013, 06:13:42 PM
i ALSO just realized that sky paladin's scum picks are literally the three people that are voting him at the moment. rofl
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 06:15:06 PM
Anyway, hopefully I've helped Darkie realize that there is no good reason for him to believe I'm scum at this point, even with the extra four townreads he assumes. Let's get back on topic.

What do people think about Dormio at this point? I'm not saying that I want to lynch him over Paladin at this point, but if I can get the uncertainty regarding my alignment cleared up without being lynched, I'd definitely prefer to do so and lynch either of the two than let myself get lynched unnecessarily.

cut by... Dang it, Dark. Think. Please. Not thinking is absolutely not a valid excuse. If you can't reject my logic in any other way, then your reason for voting me no longer stands.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 06:31:56 PM
If imo you told me why lynching someone else can reveal more info to town at this point i might think more. But what i see is another actiondan style panic coaster by polaria and you.
Fine, I'll bite.

I don't know what kind of associative reads you think I have on me, but one thing I am almost positive on is that Sky Paladin and Dormio have different alignments. One is undoubtedly a mafia member, and one is undoubtedly a town member. Lynching either one would be beneficial, because either we end up lynching a mafia member or we end up lynching a town member and exposing a mafia member. Once we get a mafia flip, we can actually start making connections and associative reads that have a basis. On the other hand, let's say you lynch me, and I flip town. What's next? Where do you go from there? Doing so has only proven that the posts I made were from a townie's point of view. Will there be anybody at all who becomes suspicious as a result of my town flip? No. Lynching me simply clears up my own point of view and gives town another day's worth of vague vote-analysis bullcrap to sift through.

I don't even think me flipping scum would help you all that much, would it? If I remember correctly, you never brought up what you think my associative reads are, and at the moment I seem to be able to recall at least four different players who would be on theoretical scumteams with me based on different players' analyses.

I am not scum, and I am not even the most beneficial townie to lynch at the moment. The most beneficial mislynch right now is either Paladin or Dormio, and whichever one isn't a mislynch is a mafia member, so it's effectively a win-win situation. If you lynch me, it'll be a lose-win situation where even if the win part wasn't impossible it still wouldn't provide decent information.

Please. Think. Get your vote onto someone where you're actually helping the town.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 10, 2013, 06:35:38 PM
I know I said I wasn't bothered by being lynched at this point but Darkie is clearly not even trying to think about why he's voting for me and that just bothers me to no end.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 10, 2013, 10:30:04 PM
Votecount unchanged. You have 6 hours and 30 minutes.

I did forget about the bars, by the way, but don't worry. They'll be back.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 10, 2013, 10:37:00 PM
Yo, what's up?
First things first, sorry about disappearing yesterday.
My neck basically killed me.
It's (mostly) better now, though.

Anyway.
I'll make another post about Sky Palladium's supposed case on me whenever I'm done with DotA.

I did forget about the bars, by the way, but don't worry. They'll be back.
Back, back again.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 10, 2013, 10:37:47 PM
realized that i've been thinking "sky paladin vs. cheez" for a while now but i don't know if anything denies the possibility that they might both be scum
I've been thinking about this too. Cheez and Paladin aren't really pushing each other, I've noticed Paladin isn't pushing Cheez real hard, offering up alternatives like Dormio, and Cheez is only pushing Paladin subtly, also going for Dormio.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Validon98 on November 10, 2013, 11:56:01 PM
And I've been busy for most of today. Tomorrow doesn't look too hot either but then again it will be night phase so whatever. This lack of time plus the waning of my motivation to play is bugging me, but I don't want to replace out only because I actually want to see another Mafia game through.

Anyways, I just read through Cheez's big defense on himself with all the sarcasm in it, and based on it I've decided to change my mind. I pushed him for how he acted and for the same reasons as Kilga, but by now I've realized that town could step off of a major wagon or otherwise not go for it because they don't believe in it. I mean, I got a lot of flak in the last game for hard defending Raikaria when practically everyone else was against him, so from a town perspective it makes sense.

##Unvote

In the meanwhile Dark is increasingly getting on my nerves. His annoying posts have been stewing on the back of my mind for a while but I've been jumping on "obvscum" players. He just looks like he's trying to confuse people from what I've read of him, and I don't see that as townie behavior. I'm done with that now.

##Vote: Darkninjaabc
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 12:14:38 AM
Okay, finished reading. I'm sorry; I thought the phase ended tomorrow and was a bit lazy.

Anyways, I see that Mitsuki was voting Polaris. I think Polaris could be scum on PoE + rolespec because I can't really see why town would need two Best Pals in a game that is apparently closer to Vanilla on the scale of role madness. However, I think that Mitsuki's case on him sucked and don't particularly have a better one to offer atm. ##Unvote.

I still think Validon is the scummiest person. His posts today can be summed up in three phases:

1) Promising to post content about Cheez.
2) One post about Cheez with a vote for him in it, maybe another post in response to a rebuttal by him. His case was also pretty bad, with the main reason beyond "urgh" being a misrep. Cheez didn't say he was unsure about voting DNA in the first place, he said he was unsure about dropping the case.
3) Back to no content.

I was mostly okay with Cheez but his posts near the end of the day have really pinged me. At first he was like "I can see why town might want to lynch me best of luck guys!!!" which strikes me as super WIFOM, especially as he didn't actually give up at that point. And then his last post had like a gigantic wall of talking about how not voting for the main wagon of the day isn't scummy and he therefore shouldn't be lynched, even though as far as I can tell absolutely nobody is actually voting him for that. If they are, please correct me. But as it looks to me his defence seems entirely irrelevant and an attempt to look townie on effort. That being said, I generally think Vanilla claims as a reaction to getting run up are legit because they don't make anyone stop and pause and reconsider, and often get lynched over a counterwagon with a claimed role just on account of being Vanilla. So ugh.

Also, I'm not sure if Cheez and Validon make sense as scumbuddies, with Validon's vote there. Didn't particularly feel like a bus. Validon has also felt scummier for longer though, and Cheez is at L-1 I think, so ##Vote: Validon.

I'm inclined to believe NNR, so apparently Kilga is confirmed town to me. Sounds good.

I want a response from Sky as to what he thinks about Polaris. He's said like, absolutely nothing about Polaris whatsoever that I can remember despite pushing a Serela vote based partly on their roles not making sense as both being town. His sudden reaction to like one vote at the beginning of the phase was also somewhat suspicious.

Still can't remember anything from Dormio. I think he voted Cheez on D3 and then had some stuff against Sky?

Scum are between Validon, Cheez, Sky, Dormio, and Polaris, I think. I really want Polaris to be town because none of his posts have jumped out to me but based on interactions I think Validon/Sky/Polaris make the best sense as a team, unless Dormio busses a lot as scum. Can't remember him doing so in Mirai Nikki.

Anyways, unfortunately, a game I'm in on SF has a phase end at the exact same time as this one, so I'll try to be around but I can't promise constant f5 level of activity near phase end.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 12:16:46 AM
Cut by that post. NVM Validon and Cheez can be scumbuddies again. Also lmao at Validon voting DNA again after all the times he's pushed against people for voting him beyond the first half of D1. Pretty confident Validon is the scums. Would support a powerwagon.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: NekoNekoRex on November 11, 2013, 12:55:59 AM
BBM, what do you think about our leading candidates today? We only got 5 hours left and I'd rather not have a deadline event if we can avoid it. I'm not too confident on Validon tonight.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 01:12:31 AM
I don't think DNA is scum. I would lynch Cheez over Sky because Sky's posts read more like legitimate effort and I no longer think that a Validon/Cheez scumteam is implausible. Also overall I'm not sure that the vanilla claim would make up for his bad defence, especially as it's possible he could be a Goon, what with this game being closer to Vanilla than Role Madness.

I still want Sky to give a read on Polaris though.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 02:02:12 AM
I was mostly okay with Cheez but his posts near the end of the day have really pinged me. At first he was like "I can see why town might want to lynch me best of luck guys!!!" which strikes me as super WIFOM, especially as he didn't actually give up at that point. And then his last post had like a gigantic wall of talking about how not voting for the main wagon of the day isn't scummy and he therefore shouldn't be lynched, even though as far as I can tell absolutely nobody is actually voting him for that. If they are, please correct me.
1: WIFOM... Er... Well, at least this is probably the last acronym I'm going to have to ask about.

2: Darkie was voting me for that. I wouldn't really have gotten back into defending myself except he made it pretty clear that he barely put any thought into his vote and that angered me a lot. People voting me for actual reasons, I can understand, especially with the amount of uncertainty I've allowed to build up regarding my alignment, but barely reading the thread and then voting me because he found an argument somewhere that sounds easy to comprehend? No.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:07:50 AM
Re: Kilga @ Sky;
I'm dropping the 'good player' thing.  It's not relevant to any of my arguments.  I just posted it as a 'get my thoughts down on paper'.  But it doesn't help - right or wrong - to resolve the situation.  I'll let it go. 

Next point:  Cheez8 didn't vote for Dormio with at least one other person, so my vote stays on Cheez8. 

Next point:
Quote
nice to know sky paladin is trying to call the scum team without having properly looked at 2/3 of the people he is accusing.
I primarily went with Kilga and Mitsuki's rationalisation instead of rehashing what they had already written.  I secondarily went by association.  You did the exact same thing Dormio did (dismiss Mitsuki's argument about you while avoiding Kilga's assassination of Cheez8, then vote for me for no apparent reason).  What's your reason for voting me, anyway?  Last I saw it was because you were playing pokemon. 
The most likely reason is that you're voting for me along with your scumbuddies to save Cheez8. 
However, since you insist, I'll ISO you next. 

Quote
i ALSO just realized that sky paladin's scum picks are literally the three people that are voting him at the moment. rofl
 
Of course they are the three that are voting for me.  Because you three are trying to lynch me to save your scum buddy!  And nobody else is voting for me because you are the only three who keep saying 'Sky seems suspicious' without ever saying why.  You don't have anything and just randomly voted for me.  What else are we supposed to think? 

Next point.
NNR
Quote
Cheez and Paladin aren't really pushing each other, I've noticed Paladin isn't pushing Cheez real hard, offering up alternatives like Dormio, and Cheez is only pushing Paladin subtly, also going for Dormio.

I didn't focus on Cheez8 because I assumed Kilga had wrapped this up.  I then looked for associative reads.  I had been bothered by Dormio tunneling me from day 1, and wondered if he'd done anything else.  I found that he had had more contact and suspicion of Cheez8 but had only ever voted for me, for no sustainable reason.  I also found that Dormio had lied about the time he had spent scumhunting (in fact, he had done none at all). 

My vote is on Cheez8 because I agreed with Kilga's analysis of the votes.  It STAYED on Cheez8 (instead of going to Dormio) because the association with Dormio read as scum.  Finally, the easiest way to test my hypothesis is to see if (or when) either Dormio or Validon will switch to lynch Cheez8 as well. 

Summary
Cheez8 is PROBABLY scum because of Kilga's vote analysis, and association with Dormio (who is almost certainly scum) and Polaris (who is probably scum).  That's an 'almost certainly' and two 'probably' that Cheez8 gets all to his own. 
Therefore, I'd like town to lynch Cheez8 today, thank you.  We can pick between Dormio and Polaris tomorrow. 

If you really want to go for Polaris today because that seems to be the feeling of some people I guess we can do that instead. 

ISO of Polaris inc. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:10:59 AM
did sky paladin literally not read the game
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 11, 2013, 02:11:37 AM
So I was called to do other stuff after playing some DotA.
Anyway.

Dormio voted for Shadoweh with the salad...rp...thing.  Not really important.  So, what did he actually do? 
First, he voted for Serela in D1.  Then a few posts later, finally posts his reason (http://). 
Dormio's next content post is http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038887.html#msg1038887 actually just a play-by-play, with nothing new actually posted.  Then there's this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038999.html#msg1038999) where Dormio accuses Serela of doing no scum-hunting, when in fact Dormio is in the same boat. 
Then there's http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039308.html#msg1039308 this which says nothing.  Also, maybe a scumtell?  It took Dormio over an hour to write a post about nothing, according to '11 new replies' and timestamp comparison. 
Then, this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039329.html#msg1039329) where an additional 14 posts magically appeared for your three sentence post.  That means it took you half an hour to make that post and TWO OF THE POSTS WERE FROM DORMIO.  A little chronologically confused, imo. 
It looks like Dormio is not only putting in no effort but they are trying to fake it to look like they are putting in more than they really are. 
There's nothing of consequence out of Dormio right up until the end of the phase.  His net effort was to vote for Serela seemingly randomly early in the day, add in some reasoning later, then not change his vote. 
Uhh, lol?
So apparently me saying why Serela is scum is doing no scum hunting. Okie dokie.
And if you're going to talk about the new reply warnings, you should note that I keep one tab open while refreshing everything else.
The fact that you're actually trying to use something like that as part of a case against me is pretty hilarious.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?
Also, goddamnit, fix your bloody links. I touched up a couple of them but come on.

Day 2. 
Dormio starts off voting for me based on this post. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039899.html#msg1039899)
I've made my position clear on this a number of times, so it's annoying to be deliberately misrepresented. 
Point 1 - Who arbitrarily decided it was no longer RVS time?  Actually, it was Dormio (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038416.html#msg1038416), who, only a few hours earlier, had been posting about brussel sprouts along with me and, not incidentally, pushing for a lynch on Shadoweh. 
Point 2 - Dormio decided that RVS had ended (and posted about it on day 1), and then linked back to it in day 2 to say "Hey Sky was still doing RVS at the end of RVS".  So providing 'evidence' that they had arbitrarily created and putting forth as the new truth is the Dormio play style?  OK :D 
Then there's this 'Sky just posted fluff' comment.  Bullshit.  I explained WHY my vote was RVS, and also that I had put in a serious vote since then.  I posted a preliminary scumreading.
Deliberately misrepresented?
If anything, I think it's the other way around.
Re: Point 1. Well you'll notice that, if you read carefully, there is some serious discussion going on.
Now, I don't know about you, but when discussion is actually starting and someone decides to throw their hands up into the air and shout "Hey! Look! I can put down random votes too!", it's pretty distracting and doesn't assist the discussion in any way, shape, or form.
Re: Point 2. This is like, the exact same thing as point 1, isn't it? Nice padding I guess?
Also, re: fluff. Okay, you explained that your vote was placed randomly. This contributes nothing towards the collective scumhunting effort. Therefore, it's fluff.
And your preliminary scumreading (which you didn't actually link and I'm going to assume is this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038720.html#msg1038720)) basically boils down to the following:
What a great amount of content that's super useful for everyone else to figure out what you're thinking.
It's like all, well, who the fuck do you think is actually scum? You had nothing but null opinions or very fence-sitting-ey opinions which is why it's all fluff.
I like how you're trying to both clear yourself and discredit me at the same time with something that clearly doesn't hold its weight and you just conveniently happened not to put in the link so that hopefully people will be too lazy to look it up.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

I actually responded to Dormio's post, here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039957.html#msg1039957).  What's his response? 

Well actually, he did pick up this -   People assumed I was newb.  I felt no reason to disprove this, if it meant I could avoid some unjustified suspicion.  But his actual response to my defence was a single throw away line here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040162.html#msg1040162), where he talked about living in Australia.  No attempt to back up his point or rebuke mine.  But...there's no vote change.  He semi-reads Cheez8 but doesn't say anything in particular, or change his vote. 
I ignored it mostly because your response is bad.
I don't see how the fuck I'm supposed to respond to an appeal to emotions so I won't.
Like, all you literally did was affirm my words and try to put some pretty framing around it.
And why would I change my vote when you do absolutely nothing like scumhunting to change my mind?
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

There's another play-by-play (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040528.html#msg1040528) here that ignores my defense and just reiterates Dormio's vague arguments earlier.  I can't see a town ignoring a valid defence.  A towny should have attacked my defense or accepted it - and amended their vote accordingly.  Not ignored it entirely.  That's a scum play. 
What defence? All I saw was excuses.
And I like how, on top of that, you're the one ignoring my words.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

Here's a counterargument against http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040533.html#msg1040533 Cheez8.  It's relevant because I'm going to posit that Cheez8 and Dormio are scums together.  Although Dormio ignored my response, he went into detail with this one for no apparent reason; he even says at the end 'back to making words about Shadoweh'.  But at this point, he was still voting for me
So? I fail to see how this is relevant to me being scum.
Are you trying to suggest that I should be focusing only on the person I'm voting and ignoring the rest of the game?
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

This post (No link, I'm going to assume that it's this one (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040560.html#msg1040560)) is the first bit of actual scumhunting Dormio has done.  There's this:in regards to Shadoweh missing my point about the not-vighit, that Cheez8 picked up, and then Shadoweh quoted.  That was an alarm bell for a lot of people. 
It's clear here that Dormio is 'suspecting' Cheez8, but not doing anything about it.  There's some back and forth between Cheez8 and Dormio but Dormio doesn't really talk to Shadoweh at any point. 
Uh, what the fuck is this even supposed to be saying?
I'm assuming that you're saying that I'm scum for suspecting Cheez8 but not voting for him, right?
Have you tried considering the fact that there might be more than one scum in the game, and that people might actually have more than one suspect at a time.
A revolutionary concept, I'm sure, but one that you should really try to get a grasp of.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

Then Dormio vanishes until hammer time and then hammers. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041060.html#msg1041060)  There's no thought process or any mention of reasoning on how he suddenly switched from Sky to Cheez8 (the more credible target) and then Shadoweh.  Just bam, you're dead. 
Uh, what?
I would have thought that, considering I'm your big scumread for today, you would have actually bothered to do that thing where you, you know, read my posts.
If you look really carefully, you can actually notice that I mention that I had faith in Kilga's case on Shadoweh and the anti-Shadoweh sentiment in general.
Which leaves us with Shadoweh.
Firstly, like on D1, I find myself attracted to Kilga's words.
Useless bunnies good only for their sex appeal.
This post also has my other thoughts on why Shadoweh was scum but whatever.
But, you know, I understand that you really want to push this case on me, even if you have to make up bullshit to do so.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

Day 3!  The very next thing Dormio does is vote for me again (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041498.html#msg1041498).  No mention of the hammer business.  But once again, Dormio pays a huge amount of attention to what Cheez8 says, and pretty much ignores my defence.  He actually says "Sky_Paladin is too clean" so I must be scum.  That makes no sense.  It's also wrong.  As I've said...many times...I'm not sorry for Serela.  I am sorry for Shadoweh.  Stop ignoring what I wrote except for when it suits you.  What's you're actual case against me? 
First, what would I even say about the hammer? How is this meant to be a point against me? Whatever.
What defence?
And I love how ridiculously out of context you take my words and try to twist them to fit your own agenda.
If you actually read my posts, maybe you would understand that the "too clean(?)" comment is not about you having solid play but you very evidently trying to avoid any responsibility for any of the lynches that occurred.
But I guess that would undermine your case on me.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

Once again, Dormio quotes and argues against Cheez8 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041502.html#msg1041502), but where's the vote?  Still on Sky.
Why?  Because I believe Dormio wants to make a case of disassociating from Cheez8 if one of them is caught.  Which is difficult now, because, both Cheez8 and Dormio are voting for Sky, despite Dormio constantly attacking Cheez8 and basically ignoring what Sky said.  Actually, he continues to refer to his own made up conclusions as if they were evidence. 
What even the fuck?
I think I'm just going to quote something from an earlier paragraph.
Have you tried considering the fact that there might be more than one scum in the game, and that people might actually have more than one suspect at a time.
A revolutionary concept, I'm sure, but one that you should really try to get a grasp of.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?

Dormio next appears to say Mitsuki is stupid (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041783.html#msg1041783) without clarifying why.  Perhaps because she's accusing the last potential scumbuddy, Polaris.  Who is also, not incidentally, voting for me.  Dormio reappears again to reiterate that he thinks Mitsuki is http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042114.html#msg1042114 dumb without any proof, just arbitrarily 'I think Mitsuki's posts are kind of dumb and I'm ignoring them since Kilga is super awesome and I don't have a reason to disbelieve NNR.'  Mitsuki wasn't attacking NNR.  She was pursuing Polaris.  What's the association between Polaris and Cheez8 at this time?  None, except for the one Dormio has in his mind. 
Uh, because Mitsuki's posts were stupid? I don't really think there's much more to say about them.
Also, are you even trying?
Do you not recall NNR's claim that Kilga and Mitsuki are of the same alignment?
I think Kilga is super awesome, and I don't really think that NNR is being the scumbag that he normally is, so it's like Mitsuki is probably town too.
Which means that I get to ignore her posts because they're stupid and trying to parse them makes my brain hurt.
I have no idea where you're getting this connection between Polaris and Cheez8 from, but I mean, I guess that's what you get from trying too hard to force a bullshit case.
I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 11, 2013, 02:12:05 AM
Also there were like a million cuts so let me read those and make another post.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:14:04 AM
You did the exact same thing Dormio did (dismiss Mitsuki's argument about you while avoiding Kilga's assassination of Cheez8, then vote for me for no apparent reason).
^ did not read the game

Quote
you are the only three who keep saying 'Sky seems suspicious' without ever saying why.
^ did not read the game

Quote
If you really want to go for Polaris today because that seems to be the feeling of some people I guess we can do that instead.
^ did not read the game
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 02:15:55 AM
sigh

At this point I'm really beginning to consider me being lynched as a good thing because so many people are already discussing the people who would be scumbuddies with me and are using it as a major part of their reasoning regarding other scum members' identities. None of these people are on the right track and the one and only reason I haven't actively supported me being lynched at this point is the possibility that the people doing this are mostly mafia members hoping for me to do myself in or something. Seriously, you guys are so confident while being dead wrong it's stopped being funny.

Not to say it wasn't funny at some point earlier.

ppfffff HELLO FOUR NEW CUTS INCLUDING OH MY GOSH THAT IS LONG
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:18:35 AM
honestly sky paladin thinking i'm scum is an incredible unwarranted flip-flop from

But then Polaris is voting for Cheez8, so...I'm pretty sure at least one of my scum picks is wrong.  There's the meta idea of, well, Polaris had the best pals thing.  We had some speculation that might be a scum role because...well...it seemed right.  If it was scum/town, then there was some good reason for scum to kill-off the other town buddy so their guy was free to vote wherever.  Would they do it though?  It would be a good clear tell that Polaris was scum.  But town killed off Serela so we can't know.  It's really...a how do you feel.  I think Polaris is a good candidate for a 'same as Kilga/Mitsuki team' check.  So I will pencil Polaris in as 'not-scum-for-today'.

based on blatant sheeping from mitsuki's case alone (which I already said was bad) (plus i'm pretty sure i gave some reasons for why it was bad that largely went ignored because y'all are weenies) and that really makes me think that sky paladin is hardly being genuine about his reads right now
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:25:03 AM
also, before I go to dinner, I don't understand why everyone who attacks me has to have this snarky attitude with me, like excuse you pokemon is superior to you in every way possible and if you diss it i may as well just stop playing this game and play pokemon instead
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 02:25:32 AM
See, Paladin, this is why I'm voting you over Dormio. I'm wary of both of you two, and his responses to you make a lot of sense while your responses to him are mostly weak and baseless.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:26:04 AM
wait nvm that's because of my own snarky attitude
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 02:28:34 AM
Oh right I completely forgot that Sky was just like "EVERYONE VOTING FOR ME IS SCUM". Hmm, Polaris is making me reconsider Cheez > Sky. Since nobody wants to vote Validon, ##Unvote, ##Vote: Sky
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:32:58 AM
BBM, I'm giving you that Polaris ISO you asked for.  Now I'm at L-1.  Please cancel your vote until I've made my response. 

Dormio's counter argument is basically 'I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?'  Isn't that exactly what he is saying about himself :3

Remember, I've claimed vanilla town.  If you need to lynch me to see the truth of it, go ahead; but remember who is voting for me.  I know you are town, BBM.  Take a minute. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:34:58 AM
Polaris;

First act of day 1:  Votes for Sky_Paladin along with Dormio for 'voting after RVS had ended' (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038449.html#msg1038449).  Remember, that the one who arbitrarily decided RVS was over was in fact Dormio.  7 minutes later, switches to Validon for 'frivolity'.  Game had been running for about 24 hours at this point, according to timestamps. 

Polaris pokes Validon for a response after Polaris' vote, and incidentally, mentions mentions Cheez8 as well. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038491.html#msg1038491)

Cheez8 votes for Validon (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038508.html#msg1038508) in response to the poke.  Could be coached. 

Votes for Shadoweh. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1038922.html#msg1038922)  Not suspicous at this point of day 1 but it's not an ISO if I ignore the not-scum parts. 

Three posts in quick succession to justify (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039023.html#msg1039023) their vote against Serela, that coincidentally all defend Dormio.  Then as soon as Serela mentions that Dormio is the one who was supposed to come back with the response, Validon has to leave to watch anime. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039036.html#msg1039036)

Then when Serela finally votes Dormio, Validon pops up with this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039251.html#msg1039251) to question why Serela's even voting that way. 

At this point, Cheez8 and Serela are voting for Dormio, and Dormio and Polaris are voting for Serela.  All those names in the same spots :/  There must be something up - Polaris is worried (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039252.html#msg1039252) there won't be a lynch. 

Then there's this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039326.html#msg1039326) lol 'Cheez are you scum'.  Of course he is, and you know it. 

Hitting post now in case I get hammered before I finish. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 11, 2013, 02:35:47 AM
Dormio's counter argument is basically 'I know I said this before, but it really must be hard for you to make up a case when you're scum, huh?'  Isn't that exactly what he is saying about himself :3
This is, quite possibly, the most hilarious response that you could have given.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:37:00 AM
Also, people voting me have literally no reason to vote me over Cheez8.  He's the one being outed by Kilga's analysis.  I'm trying to help get the rest of the team.  I'm also the only other person doing any kind of scumhunting at the moment, so please get off my back and look at the people who aren't doing anything. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:41:34 AM
Look guys, it's really obvious. 

The ones who are making the most noise about me are the ones who are trying to save Cheez8.  They are not lynching me because they think I am scum.  They are trying to save their scumbuddy. 

Polaris and Dormio aren't even up for lynch today.  IT'S CHEEZ8.  Why are they making a case about me?  To save their team mate.  They know that when Cheez8 flips red, their game is over.  The only reason Dormio came out of the woodwork is because scums are right on the brink. 

There's no reason to vote for me.  I'm just scumhunting :D  Kilga and a lot of others already voted for Cheez8.  Why are they picking out on me?  Because I'm the one who figured out their story. 

If I die, you have to remember and look at who is killing me.  BBT is town.  The other three are scum. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:43:00 AM
i have every reason to vote for you because you are scummy as hell
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:44:59 AM
like, if you have to interrupt your ISO on me to make wild and baseless accusations about how we're the scum trying to silence you then that's pretty terrible
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:48:53 AM
Town, this last page is essentially Cheez8, Polaris and Dormio all piling in on me. 

They're the three I'm picking as scum.  There's no reason for them to vote for me except that I've picked them as scum.  None of them have presented a case for why I am scum except for that. 

Dormio's response looks good on the surface but there's no substance there.  He literally tunneled on me and hasn't posted anything about any other player ever, except for the two who are voting with him. 

There's a strong associative read.  Lynch Cheez8.  If somehow he's town, hell, you can kill me tomorrow and I won't care.  But if you kill me today, you're no closer to solving the riddle. 

Why are Dormio and Polaris fighting so hard to save somebody who is -allegedly- unrelated to them?  And why are they fighting so poorly? 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:50:28 AM
I had to interrupt my ISO because I'm at L-1 and you two keep posting.  An ISO *might* sway BBM's vote.  Going quiet *might* swing more votes my way, if I leave you three to prattle on uninterrupted.  I can still ISO at L-1 if things go quiet.  Right now, it's too big a risk to focus undivided on it.  But I am trying. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:51:27 AM
i'm only fighting so hard to save cheez because of arbitrary reasons that you've made up in your head
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 02:52:50 AM
Three posts in quick succession to justify (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039023.html#msg1039023) their vote against Serela, that coincidentally all defend Dormio.  Then as soon as Serela mentions that Dormio is the one who was supposed to come back with the response, Validon has to leave to watch anime. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039036.html#msg1039036)
...
wait, so, are you saying that Validon is in on this too, or what?

Also, "Cheez is scum" is not a valid argument for why Polaris is scum when Cheez is not scum.


They're the three I'm picking as scum.  There's no reason for them to vote for me except that I've picked them as scum.  None of them have presented a case for why I am scum except for that.

I thought you picked us as scum because we voted for you, though. Was I wrong?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 02:54:19 AM
nvm you just got the names wrong a few times. Probably should've checked the links beforehand but oh well
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:55:05 AM
Sorry, I got Validon mixed up as Polaris because - and this is actually pretty funny sigh - Validon, Palidan, Polaris.  So many o's and a's and i's.  It was totally Polaris. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 02:55:22 AM
^ pff oh my god

the second quote cheez quoted is just hilarious
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 02:57:50 AM
Anyway, up to page 16. ISO is coming.  Please don't hammer. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 03:00:13 AM
Also, "Cheez is scum" is not a valid argument for why Polaris is scum when Cheez is not scum.
To clarify, since this is prime material for being taken out of context: "Cheez is scum" is not a valid argument for why anyone is scum when Cheez is not scum.

Sorry, I got Validon mixed up as Polaris because - and this is actually pretty funny sigh - Validon, Palidan, Polaris.  So many o's and a's and i's.  It was totally Polaris. 
You have my sympathies.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 03:05:14 AM
That ISO of Polaris has absolutely no analysis. It's just a recounting of everything he's done this game. The closest it gets to analyzing something he's doing is where you say he's voting Serela with Dormio and even then not really. Cheez also brought up a pretty good point with you saying they're scum for voting you because you thought they were scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 03:06:19 AM
I'm not done.  I'm linking everything I need.  I'll analysis when I've finished that pass. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 03:08:49 AM
Waiting eagerly.

Also apparently you did follow up on Polaris, so my apologies for that. But I still want reasons for why he's scum other than that he's voting for you to save Cheez.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 03:23:37 AM
OK, where were we?  Ah yes.  Polaris ISO. 

Polaris defends Dormio again. (http://)

Then there's this little exchange (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039341.html#msg1039341) where Cheez8 and Polaris both joke about being scum. 

Dawn of day 2.  Polaris'  opening post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1039823.html#msg1039823) looks great.  But at the end, he says this:
Quote
I dunno what to say about Cheez, Sky Palladium, and Dormio but I figure I should mention them for posterity. It really depends on where things go from here for them. Kilga and Darkninja can also fall under this category. I shouldn't need to say Post More Things but do so anyway so that there's more to look at.
 
First of all; he apologises for the mislynch of Serela.  I did it too, but when I did it, Dormio tunnelled me, and he ignored Polaris. 
Then Polaris mentions Cheez8 and Dormio and me.  You know, the same people who are, by coincidence voting for me at the start of today ^_~  BY COINCIDENCE. 

Polaris talks about switching his vote to Shadoweh, and discusses Dormio and I.  He even says "I should probably consider Dormio as an option".  But he doesn't. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040275.html#msg1040275)

Here is Polaris' initial handwave dismissal of everything Mitsuki has to say. (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040986.html#msg1040986)

Here is Polaris' next post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1040991.html#msg1040991).  The key quote: "It's ok that Mitsuki has unique and interesting opinions but I'm unhappy with her staunch refusal to care about anyone else, which seems unnecessarily stubborn and could border on tunneling."  This is, ironically, what Polaris is doing right now, to me.  Then he says a third time  that Mitsuki's case is dumb (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041011.html#msg1041011) without saying why. 

Day 3.  Polaris starts by voting for Cheez8 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041426.html#msg1041426). 

Then there's this fairly epic (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041678.html#msg1041678) post from Mitsuki which sums up why Polaris is scum just from his own, stand alone position and self-contradictions. 

At this point, I voted Polaris because I agreed with Mitsuki's scumread on him, and also because Polaris continued to criticise Mitsuki instead of her arguments.  Isn't that one of those 'attacking the person' logical fallicies?  It's a scumtell all on it's own. 

Then there's this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1041795.html#msg1041795) where Polaris back-and-forths about Cheez8 and I as which-one-is-likely-scum. 

In response, Polaris finally for me (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042159.html#msg1042159), but there's no supporting case.  He does earlier say something like that I am sheeping Mitsuki.  Instead of following it up with a reason at the time, he has a pokemon battle >.>;;  Remember, Polaris was already voting for me.  He didn't post a reason for it prior to doing this. 

Then we catch up this current situation, started by my post accusing Dormio, Cheez8, and Polaris.  Okay.  Let's hit post and do the analysis. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 03:31:47 AM
the thing about these ISOs is that it proves you are literally making stuff up. if everything you pointed out was truly bad then you should have had some sort of issue with it when it happened. you're only saying it's bad now because you're forcing the evidence to fit with the conclusion you arbitrarily decided beforehand.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 03:33:32 AM
So the actual analysis. 

Overall, I have an impression of a teamwork relationship between Dormio, Polaris, and Cheez8.  They often talk to each other, focus on each other, and ignore other people.  For example, there's that little 'Are you scum' 'maybe are you scum' exchange which was kind of lol.  Then there's the times when Cheez8 and Dormio and Polaris will criticise each other but they never really vote.  Polaris was voting for Cheez8 at the start of the day but as soon as it appears there was a credible threat to Cheez8 in the form of Kilga, switched his vote to me. 

My initial read of Dormio (instead of Polaris) is because while I was away from the computer, I was thinking about Dormio.  In my mind he was more likely scum.  It wasn't until I went back and did the ISO of Dormio that I saw how much he, Polaris, and Cheez8 were interacting. 

In regards to, specifically Polaris - I think out of the three, he is the one I am least confident on.  He has actually done more scumhunting than the other two. 

However, there's alarm bells because of who Polaris specifically defends - especially mid day 1, when Serela voted for Dormio.  Cheez8 was already voting for Dormio, but Polaris only attacked Serela about it - several times.  Why the bias? 

Then there's the fact that Polaris mentions Dormio as somebody who he should look at but never does; even in his night 1 analysis acknowledges that he doesn't have anything to say about Cheez, Dormio, and I. 

The whole handwaving of Mitsuki's arguments was a big red flag for me.  He just attacked Mitsuki and said she was dumb.  Dormio did the same thing.  They didn't dismantle what she said so in my mind it still stands.  When I read this post I was suspicious of Polaris.  When Polaris attacked Mitsuki instead of her argument, saying something like she should go back to Weenie Burger, I felt strongly that Polaris was scum.  That's why I voted for him, at the time. 

I could have expected Polaris to vote for me at that point.  But he didn't.  Instead he went silent and said 'I have to consider'.  I assume this means, confer with his scumbuddies, who they would try to counterlynch to save Cheez8.  And then, there's a vote on me, for nothing more substantial than 'Sky is sheeping Mitsuki'. 

Well, now I am definitely not sheeping Mitsuki, and his reason is 'because Sky is voting for Cheez8'. 

Why do you care if I vote for Cheez8?  Do you, in the face of Kilga's analysis, believe Cheez8 to be town?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 11, 2013, 03:37:43 AM
I'm back from lunch and laffo.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 03:38:38 AM
Anyway, regardless.  There's more than five people in the town although only five of them appear to be here right now :D 

I'm only seeing attacking me personally arguments from those three.  I am posting lots of points back at them.  There's nothing substantial coming from them, in fact, they are just quoting the things I am saying in the last 12 hours.  There's no history of support to back up their so-called-analysis. 

I've done as you asked.  Now please consider my request, and review what I have had to say more carefully. 

For what reason is Cheez8 voting me?  -> Because he is up for lynch, and I am the strongest counterlynch. 
For what reason is Dormio voting me?  -> ??? Because he thinks I am scum based on my argument that he is scum. 
For what reason is Polaris voting me?  -> ??? Because he wants to save Cheez8. 

Why would Polaris want to save Cheez8 when Kilga's anaylsis shows Cheez8 is very likely scum?
Why is there a game history of Polaris, Cheez8 and Dormio all interacting with the exclusion of most other players?
Why do these three often do the same thing (often in pairs only)? 
Why did Polaris, initially, vote for me?

They'll just say something like 'because we think Sky is scum.' 

But the only reason they thought that in the first place, according to their todays argument, is because of my post from twelve hours ago. 

BUT THEY WERE ALREADY VOTING FOR ME BEFORE THEN.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 11, 2013, 03:40:25 AM
(http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f231/CruxisAurion/timetostopposting.jpg)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 03:42:36 AM
Well in the end, it comes down to two votes.  NNR and BBM :) 

Please take the twenty minutes to go-reread the last few pages and make your choice. 

Cheez8 or Sky_Paladin? 

Please consider Cheez8 in the context of the scum team.  You can easily associate him with Dormio and Polaris. 

If you want to vote for me, please consider me in the context of a scum team, and who those people might be.  Are they the ones I am pushing to lynch right now?  The same ones that are voting to lynch me?  How can that be a team?  What combination of players can possibly have me as scum? 

At the very least, you must agree that Cheez8 and I can't be on the same team.  So if you must lynch me today, don't let Cheez8 get away tomorrow. 

Please choose wisely. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 03:43:18 AM
shit I just remembered that my role means there's a good chance that Sky is town sfgfsda

##Unvote

Not particularly up to lynching Sky anymore. I know this is like wtf flip-flop but urgh.

Can we have votals?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 03:44:22 AM
They often talk to each other, focus on each other, and ignore other people.
Pretty sure I've talked to a lot of people during this game. In fact, I'm pretty sure I rarely ever discussed anything with Polaris. The only other people I think I've not had much discussion or debate with were Shadoweh, Mitsuki and NNR.

For what reason is Cheez8 voting me?  -> Because he is up for lynch, and I am the strongest counterlynch. 
Well, duh. Why wouldn't I vote for somebody who I believe to be scum?


....
Huh? The heck is your role?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 03:44:37 AM
well shoot

is this information something you want to divulge or should i just trust you blindly >______>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 03:46:20 AM
Sure :)  Votals are here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,15788.msg1042416.html#msg1042416).

At the moment, I am L-2 and Cheez8 is L-1. 

Cheez8 (4): Kilgamayan, Validon98, Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc
Sky_Paladin (3): Dormio, Cheez8, Polaris
Polaris (1): BigBangMeteor
Darkninjaabc (1): NekoNekoRex
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 03:47:53 AM
This is kind of a last-minute stunt you're pulling but I'm interested in hearing this, especially if it means I'm on the wrong track right now.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 03:48:31 AM
^ literally did not read the game

the point of the votecount is to update all the votes you know

cheez - kilga, sky paladin, darkninja
sky paladin - dormio, cheez, polaris
darkninja - nnr, validon

not voting: bbm
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 03:48:49 AM
that was aimed at sky paladin by the way
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 11, 2013, 03:49:06 AM
Hmm?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 03:49:48 AM
Ah sorry, I just copy pasted from the last update that I saw. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 03:50:41 AM
I don't particularly want to say why. If I die it should be obvious based on what I've said and if I don't I'll out tomorrow. It's just that any explanation other than Sky being town would probably require more role power than I expect town to have in this game.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 03:52:36 AM
Yeah okay ##Vote: Cheez

Sky's case on Polaris sucks because it relies on associative reads without a flip and sheeps someone I would find scummy if I hadn't replaced into their slot but grr.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 03:53:23 AM
i hate everything
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 03:55:36 AM
Yeah okay ##Vote: Cheez

Sky's case on Polaris sucks because it relies on associative reads without a flip and sheeps someone I would find scummy if I hadn't replaced into their slot but grr.
Thank you. I don't understand why nobody else gets this.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 03:56:22 AM
it's kind of ironic you're saying thank you to a post that puts you at l-1
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 03:58:24 AM
I'm inclined to read that as Cheez being scum and giving up but feeling happy that at least someone realized how bad Sky's case is.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 03:58:34 AM
Yeah.

Like I said, it's pretty clear that the immense amounts of uncertainty I've surrounded myself with aren't helping anybody. I've expected to be lynched for a while, so I've just been commenting on reasons and logic while I wait to try to keep people from going too far off course.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 03:58:51 AM
shoot no that was a response to Palidon I'm not scum
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Cheez8 on November 11, 2013, 03:59:10 AM
NAMES
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 04:06:34 AM
i still hate you all

if i'm going to hammer i'll do it when i see bt's light turn green so that i know we'll get an expedient flip when i do

but i've been less confident about cheez ever since the claim and his efforts have sounded pretty genuine and ??? so i'm hesitant to hammer
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Sky_Paladin on November 11, 2013, 04:08:51 AM
Focus your hate~~~

I want to finally add that Polaris was the one I am LEAST confident of.  Dormio is my chief suspect, but Cheez8 is in the net Kilga drew up, so that's why I'm going there. 
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 04:16:02 AM
I would still totally go for a Validon turbowagon with 45 minutes left since I am also less than confident about Cheez and much more confident that Validon is scum.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on November 11, 2013, 04:16:41 AM
Well, personally, I think Cheez8 is scum too so I'm fine with hammering that.
But I am interested in BBM's information.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 04:19:43 AM
i hate turbowagons on principle so this is a lose-lose situation for me <_>
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 04:25:36 AM
Turbowagons are amazing when they hit scum, especially early on in the game, because pretty much everyone who votes for them gets confirmed town. Not so good when they hit town because then you get like barely any reads but still.
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 11, 2013, 04:34:21 AM
Votecount 3.8

Cheez8 (4): Kilgamayan, Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, BigBangMeteor
Sky_Paladin (3): Dormio, Cheez8, Polaris
Darkninjaabc (2): NekoNekoRex, Validon98

It's 5 to lynch and 25 minutes remaining.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131111T07&p0=110&msg=Day+3)
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BigBangMeteor on November 11, 2013, 04:45:48 AM
Is anyone here to hammer?
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 04:47:23 AM
i'm here :ohdear:
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: Polaris on November 11, 2013, 04:49:08 AM
##Unvote
##Vote Cheez8


I HATE EVERYTHING
Title: Re: Justice Juice Mafia (DAY 3)
Post by: BT on November 11, 2013, 04:52:10 AM
Votecount 3.9 - HAMMER

Cheez8 (5): Kilgamayan, Sky_Paladin, Darkninjaabc, BigBangMeteor, Polaris
Sky_Paladin (2): Dormio, Cheez8
Darkninjaabc (2): NekoNekoRex, Validon98

~

Cheez8 was lynched. He was:

Quote
Welcome to Justice Juice Mafia, Cheez8! You're Peril Pear. Your friend is intimidation, and rightfully so - not much else can match the fear you inflict upon evildoers. If it's ever needed, you have the physical oomph to match. You're happy with your part of keeping the scene clean of filth.

Your role is Vanilla Town. The evildoes are lurking in the shadows, so your options are limited. The best you can do is support your teammates vocally.

You win when all evildoers are eliminated.

It is now Night 3. Deadline is in 24 hours.
(Countdown) (http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20131112T07&p0=110&msg=Night+3&swk=1)

New thread coming shortly, I guess.