Hey, Raikaria, here's a little tip from me to you.
You know that thing where you build associations and the like.
It's literally
useless until you have relevant flips.
Like, I know that you're probably going to try to use this very post as more ~damning evidence~ that Dan and I are the scum team that you're looking for, but I feel the need to say this.
This also applies to you, Sky Palladium, since you went crazy with the whole creating scum teams thing on Day 1.
Of course, this doesn't apply if you realize what you're doing is absolute bull and have no other choice because you're having difficulty coming up with anything resembling a proper case because you're scum, but could you try just a little bit harder?
It really is quite annoying to see that this pathetic association crap is the best that you can come up with as scum.
Like, here I was, hoping for members of scum to be a little bit more competent and this is the best that you can do?
Anyway, with that out of the way, let's address the rest of your hilarious post.
1: CF7ActionDan started the wagon. He made the initial case. He actively lied and spouted nonsense about it to encourage people to consolidate on it. As I said before: Serela called him out on it as well D1.
(I'm assuming that your responses correlate to the lines you've quoted from me, feel free to correct me if you're referring to something else)
This doesn't change the fact that you are not disputing what I said about you.
You are still failing to account for the actual case on CF7. For example, mine.
Are you saying that the CF7 lynch went through purely due to scaremongering from Dan?
Because I'm pretty sure that's not what happened and the fact that you're trying to use this as the crux of your case against Dan makes me think that your case is bullshit coming from scum.
2: Actiondan was actively defending you and discouraging people from voting you. It is perfectly reasonable to assume in that case that you have a good chance of being a scumbuddy.
lel. I don't really think that there's anything for me to say here.
3: Wait what? I've already built my case on Dan. I've hardly even made a case on you except 'Dormio's not been that active and Dormio is being defended by Dan a lot'
Are you even keeping track of your own post?
"It is perfectly reasonable to assume in that case that you have a good chance of being a scumbuddy."
You think that Dan is scum.
If Dan is scum you think that I am scum by virtue of Dan being scum.
This gives you an excuse to vote for me without a case today if my lynch becomes viable for whatever reason.
So, yeah, the fact that you are giving yourself the option of easily voting me while not having to actually bother building a case is pretty scummy.
So thanks for proving my point I guess?
4: I'm half tempted to use one of your earlier laughing GIFs that you used on Sky here; but I'm too mature to sink to that level. This is a complete and utter misrep. I am not saying 'Actiondan is scum for pushing a lynch with less people on it.'. I am saying 'Actiondan is scum for constantly pushing lynch viability as the reason that others should switch to CF7, rather than using his own points, and ignoring the fact his lynch is NOT the most viable.'
I am pretty sure that I'm not really understanding what you're saying here and I may have misunderstood the original premise.
Can you clarify this for me?
"Ermahgawd, Dormio is so scummy for chainsaw defending Dan right now! Those two must obviously be scum together!"
I'm pretty sure that this is going to be your response, so I'm going to say the following assuming that this is your response.
Maybe, next time, you should try not being scum so that you can build an actual case instead of the cheap imitation of one that you're presenting right now.
Also, what I said above about associative reads being useless until there are relevant flips. (I think that Serela said something similar to this somewhere but whatever)
Anyway, I'm going to play video games and then go to sleep.
Ciao.