Author Topic: Darker than Black Mafia (Game Over Scum win)  (Read 46720 times)

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #150 on: April 09, 2011, 03:11:10 AM »
oh god wall of text *drowns*

UK, your assessment of my phrasing is correct. I need better tests if you're going to cheat on them. I believe in catch and release though. One incorrect answer isn't enough to build a case on. I am of the opinion that one side would be more likely to take the bait then the other. But even if you had a reason for not giving an opinion you still refused to. I uh, think I saw some opinions in there somewhere though, so I'm quite content on that front. Huge post aside, isn't your vote essentially a long-winded OMGUS?

Out of curiousity, on the subject of such traps, are Bard's and rdj's interactions a similar situation in your opinion? I'm not sure how I feel about it, other then agreeing rdj sounds newbtown.

capt.h: I think you're confusing me for UK. I don't rip Bard's throat out until Day 2.


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #151 on: April 09, 2011, 03:13:45 AM »
@Shadoweh: Bad! OMGUS doesn't exist. I have valid reasons for voting Zakeri. If he tried voting anyone else with the same reasoning, I'd have jumped on him. Just because he happens to be targetting me does *not* mean my case is invalid. If it helps, read it as if he voted Person X who has acted exactly like I have. And then tell me he isn't scummy.

Anyway, I had a feeling it might have been that, but I don't think it's effective and helps scum more because it's the kind of trap that doesn't say *lots* about intent.


capt. h

  • Only sane townie
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #152 on: April 09, 2011, 03:18:41 AM »
oh god wall of text *drowns*

UK, your assessment of my phrasing is correct. I need better tests if you're going to cheat on them. I believe in catch and release though. One incorrect answer isn't enough to build a case on. I am of the opinion that one side would be more likely to take the bait then the other. But even if you had a reason for not giving an opinion you still refused to. I uh, think I saw some opinions in there somewhere though, so I'm quite content on that front. Huge post aside, isn't your vote essentially a long-winded OMGUS?

Out of curiousity, on the subject of such traps, are Bard's and rdj's interactions a similar situation in your opinion? I'm not sure how I feel about it, other then agreeing rdj sounds newbtown.

capt.h: I think you're confusing me for UK. I don't rip Bard's throat out until Day 2.

Maybe, but you don't have romantic love scenes with him day 1.

Your post has left me extremely confused, to the point where I'm not really sure what I'm looking at. Since confusion is not a very town thing to sow, could you explain why you posted that, and what your opinions on Bard are?

Kitten4u

  • Ochophobic
  • *
  • Too cute to kill
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #153 on: April 09, 2011, 03:21:43 AM »
Voting
Zakeri(2): NeoSerela, UncertainKitten
rdj(1): Bardiche
Serp(1): Helepolis
Dormio(1): Yonowaaru
UncertainKitten(2): Serp, Zakeri
Conqueror(1): Conqueror
Bardiche:(2): Dormio, capt h
Helepolis(2): Hanged Hourai, Shadoweh
capt h(2):  Schezo, rdj

Not voting

14 alive, 8 votes required for a lynch
~41 hours remain (I think my last time count was a bit off, this should be accurate)
« Last Edit: April 09, 2011, 06:21:32 AM by Kitte[Z]4u »
My favorite mythical creature? The honest politician.
A life cool.. where can I download one of those?
Hurray for apathy!

DA|Tumblr

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #154 on: April 09, 2011, 03:22:53 AM »
Captain H.
Tell me. Who. Is scum.

Why. Does. ShadowehxBard. Concern you. At all?

How. Are your. Questions. Pro town? Did it EVER occur to you that if ANYTHING is going on, it MIGHT be in the best interest of things to keep it from scum? OBFUSCATION ISN'T ALWAYS ANTI TOWN!


capt. h

  • Only sane townie
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #155 on: April 09, 2011, 03:31:58 AM »
Captain H.
Tell me. Who. Is scum.

Why. Does. ShadowehxBard. Concern you. At all?

How. Are your. Questions. Pro town? Did it EVER occur to you that if ANYTHING is going on, it MIGHT be in the best interest of things to keep it from scum? OBFUSCATION ISN'T ALWAYS ANTI TOWN!

How the heck would I know who is scum?

We have Shadoweh x Bard on the one hand, Helepolis not contributing anything, Serp and Schezo each having two posts tops, NeoSerela went missing, Yonowaruu still hasn't responded to what I've asked of him;

Frankly this game has too many anti-town players for me to make heads or tails of it. Everyone is playing anti-town, and I can't figure out anything.

My top picks are Helepolis for reasons I've already stated, Yonowaruu for disappearing after I tried to apply some pressure, and Shadoweh and Bard for whatever it is I'm looking at.

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #156 on: April 09, 2011, 03:38:54 AM »
Seriously. These antics haven't gotten better since I mentioned capt.h looked bad in my ~*OPINIONS*~ post. You're chasing after something tangible when you need to learn to chase after the intentions of the SCUM. I really have no intention on answering you until you stop staring in jealousy at what we have and find someone good to go after.

Oh cut by something valid. I start every Day 1 by assuming everyone is scum and going from there. Is there anything else Bard or Shadoweh has done to make you think they are scum?


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #157 on: April 09, 2011, 03:50:12 AM »
@Capt. h.: Nice evasion. Who's scum? This is not a hard question. You've more or less answered it finally! Good.

Now. Restate reasons for Hele scum.
Explain how Shadoweh and Bard are scum for their interactions?
Explain why you are entitled to any information from either of them?

And fuck anti townness. Look for SCUM, not lecture on anti townity. Hell, if you do both I'll consider it decent.



Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #158 on: April 09, 2011, 04:31:40 AM »
Obfuscation is anti-town. It is always anti-town. What you guys are getting it confused with is "Keeping secrets."

For example, lets say Shadoweh and Bardiche as super plus, anti-scum mason buddies.
What you should do is not claim anything day one. this has the benefits of: No one assumes you are both scum; Scum aren't tempted to use this to lynch one of you; Scum don't try to kill either of you for being power roles.
What you instead did was make a claim, force people to be curious, force possible townies who are inexperienced into trying to push a claim out of you for the sake of clarification, and will likely result in unwarranted town deaths should we continue down this path.

In other words, fuck both of you, no matter what your alignment is.

Quote from: Uncertain Kitten, 146
@Zak 89: Active lurking in 23 hours. Awesome. Hell, you voted me with even less hours. I think I was asleep when you did that. And I was running DnD when you posted that. Then I went out for a few hours.
You don't even know what Active lurking means, do you? It doesn't matter if you were sleeping, or playing games, or doing errends. What matters is what you do when you are playing mafia.

In post 21, you posted the obligatory "Why didn't you count my vote for someone who's not playing the game?" that accompanies your meta. That was cute, and not scummy.

In post 49, you continued your rant on Pesco, and claimed that there was nothing else that caught your eye. This is when it stopped being cute.

In post 51, you continued to say that there was nothing of use to base your vote on, acknowledged that Day one is to be used for analysis on later days, and continued to provide no vote or opinion on anyone.

In post 52, Shadoweh presented a list of things with which you could provide your opinion on.

In post 53, you refused to comment on the list.

In post 63, which I admittedly missed, you still didn't provide anything other than "Why you poking the noobies, Shadoweh?" which is at worst, a scummy suspicion wave to test out the waters for a vote, and at best, still not a vote.

In post 71, Shadoweh explains that she didn't intend to target the newbies with her list, but rather it just happened that way. Then she asked why you were pushing her for opinions without providing your own.

In post 73, you ignore her claim about the list, cast another wave of suspicion against her, repeating yourself for no reason, and still haven't put your vote down on anything, not even Shadoweh.

In short, you demand opinions while refusing to provide your own, you tried to instill suggestions that someone was scum, based on reasoning that was false, and attempted to not provide a read on anyone.

So, with that out of the way, let's break down your case on me.

"So, on the one hand, I know that bad cases aren't scummy but..."
So my case on you is not inherently scummy, gotcha.

"last time Zak made a bad case against me, he was scum."
One time, when I went to religious classes
This girl was mean to me.
Ergo, all girls are meanie-faces.

...In case it's not clear, this is a parody of the logic you're using here.

"Not to mention his complete failure to account for reality."
As I've already acknowledged, reality has little to do with the internet, which is why a majority of my case is based on what happened on the internet, not what is happening in reality.

UK's recent posts (Well, okay just post 147) Are working towards defeating my case on her, but with her recent vote and case on me, I've become more wary of her again. If attempting to push bad cases is scummy (which I'm willing to agree with) Then UK's case against me is definitely scummy.

capt. h

  • Only sane townie
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #159 on: April 09, 2011, 04:31:51 AM »
@Capt. h.: Nice evasion. Who's scum? This is not a hard question. You've more or less answered it finally! Good.

Now. Restate reasons for Hele scum.
Explain how Shadoweh and Bard are scum for their interactions?
Explain why you are entitled to any information from either of them?

And fuck anti townness. Look for SCUM, not lecture on anti townity. Hell, if you do both I'll consider it decent.

UK, Shadoweh is playing completely differently than she usually does. Neither her nor Bard seem to be taking the game seriously. She just accused me of jealousy, and Shadoweh and Bard are acting like best friends. While you're right I don't see any scum internt behind it, I don't see any town intent behind it either. I don't see anything that resembles logic behind the action. I have no idea what I'm looking at, but I know there's something fishy about it.

Now I see two players buddying up, and you tell me not to pursue them for it because they probably have a good reason.

Here's the thing, so far the only thing I've requested of Bard and Shadoweh in regards to this matter is their opinions of eachother. I don't know what I'm looking at, and I don't think my request is unreasonable when two players act that strangely.

I have genuine scum reasons for a Helepolis vote; namely that he hasn't made a visible contribution yet; and I will probably pursue him more. But the Bard x Shadoweh plays are so outright bizarre that I'm having a hard time knowing what to think, and the really, really stick out. It's the most tangible connection between two players in the game. And you telling me to ignore it is itself pretty bizarre.

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #160 on: April 09, 2011, 04:36:15 AM »
Link all the posts Zakeri, tomorrow morning I'll tell you exactly why you're wrong and why you're scummy for it.

@capt. h.: Then if you can't find the scum intent, look elsewhere for it if you are CERTAIN it exists. And you've only been asking for opinions on each other? That's hilarious. I'm pretty sure you've asked them why they are doing this no less than three times, and strongly suggested you feel it's related to role bullshit.



Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #161 on: April 09, 2011, 04:45:12 AM »
Post 48 through 53 here. I skipped 55 and 57 because they didn't really add anything useful.

Post 62 not 63, in case you think you can pull a positive spin on your posts from here.

and finally Post 73.

Good luck~

capt. h

  • Only sane townie
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #162 on: April 09, 2011, 04:46:01 AM »
Link all the posts Zakeri, tomorrow morning I'll tell you exactly why you're wrong and why you're scummy for it.

@capt. h.: Then if you can't find the scum intent, look elsewhere for it if you are CERTAIN it exists. And you've only been asking for opinions on each other? That's hilarious. I'm pretty sure you've asked them why they are doing this no less than three times, and strongly suggested you feel it's related to role bullshit.

There is no certainty in this game, UK. You know that. Certainty is something only scum have.

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #163 on: April 09, 2011, 05:34:00 AM »
How many times do I have to say I'm playing seriously? Strong language going around, let's tone down that seriousness a little.

capt.h: That doesn't mean you shouldn't look for certainty. What I find weird about your argument isn't your attacks on me, but that you're attacking Bard, who posted all of one line in response to me amid a group of joke responses. He hasn't even been here to respond to your demands but you're ready to cart us off as a pair. Here's a certainty for you.

##Unvote
##Vote: capt.h


I want you gone by the end of the day. I have no idea what you're up to but it hasn't given me a single good vibe all day. I really hate moving votes before I get a response but I can't ignore how every post you make feels like you're fishing, and you sure as heck aren't searching for scum. My cranky 2am gut wants us to start a bandwagon and really wants you to be the lucky winner. Despite Zakeri's anti-sonnet I like his case, I just don't feel UK is that scummy anymore. This is not something I'm sure of.


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #164 on: April 09, 2011, 05:48:12 AM »
Are naps awesome? Yes.
Did I manage to take one? No.
My everything hurts and I feel like throwing up.

Anyway, opinions!

Dormio: Town, clearly.

NeoSerela: ??? Confirmed and jumped on a RVS bandwagon.
That's it.
Exist please.

Hanged Hourai: On the inactive side, but I'm getting townie vibes from him.

Schezo: Seems town for now, similar to Hanged Hourai.

Zakeri: Currently getting townie vibes from him.

Conqueror: ??? Confirmed and a self vote.
As bad as NeoSerela?
Worse?
Who knows?
Do you know?

Serpentarius: Currently getting townie vibes from him.

Yonowaaru: ??? Random vote on me then disappeared.
Exist please.

Post incoming sometime later today when I don't feel like crap on Shadoweh, capt. h, Uncertain Kitten, Bardiche, rdj, and Helepolis.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
asfaerg

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #165 on: April 09, 2011, 06:15:13 AM »
So I was somewhat hoping people would bandwagon me with extreme prejudice and I'd go down in a blaze of glory on Day 1 again but it looks like most people just ignored me? :(

Not actually sure what the case on rdj is, seeing as I did something similar in my first game as town and got lynched for my trouble. His more recent posts have indicated that he is trying, at the very least.

Capt. h is following really bizarre and generally unproductive lines of inquiry. What I'm seeing is derpvoting and a general post ew that gives me a bit of a headache but not necessarily scumminess. Could one of the people voting him summarize the case on him? That said, I don't understand his vote on Bardiche (same goes for Dormio) and I am wondering why you choose to keep a fairly weak vote on him rather than switching to Helepolis, seeing as you have "genuine scum reasons" for that vote.

Speaking of Dormio, what are your stances on..anyone except Bardiche? Even the vote on Bardiche is somewhat suspect, and although I could think up some town-sourced reasons for the initial vote...well, I'll let you explain that yourself. Also, you press people a lot for opinions without giving many of your own.

Cut by Dormio's post. >_> Looks like a bunch of throwaway comments. Doesn't look good - I await that post of yours.

@Yonowaaru - Someone probably already said this, but there is still info to be gathered on D1, however sparse. You should put down an opinion and get out a serious vote.

@Mod rdj is voting capt. h - You missed that in your votecount.

Another post coming up soon.
For now,
##Unvote
##Vote: Dormio.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Pesco

  • Trickster Rabbit Tewi
  • *
  • Make a yukkuri and take it easy with me
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #166 on: April 09, 2011, 06:22:43 AM »
Voting
Zakeri(2): NeoSerela, UncertainKitten
rdj(1): Bardiche
Serp(1): Helepolis
Dormio(2): Yonowaaru, Conqueror
UncertainKitten(2): Serp, Zakeri
Bardiche:(2): Dormio, capt h
Helepolis(1): Hanged Hourai
capt h(3): Schezo, rdj, Shadoweh

Not voting
None

14 alive, 8 votes required for a lynch
~39 hours remain

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #167 on: April 09, 2011, 07:58:31 AM »

Ooh, followup post. Scary, scary.

UK's reasoning for her vote on Zakeri raises a few eyebrows (as I thought his initial case held some water, even if it was based on early RVS posts). That said, I do not agree with Zakeri's case on her, as I found her recent posts to be satisfactory in the sense that I can tell where she is coming from in her opinions and they seem to line up.

Now that said, Zakeri blatantly ignoring everything else on the table raises several questions. Such as, why are you doing so, and who else is scummy?
There's also this statement:
UK's recent posts (Well, okay just post 147) Are working towards defeating my case on her, but with her recent vote and case on me, I've become more wary of her again. If attempting to push bad cases is scummy (which I'm willing to agree with) Then UK's case against me is definitely scummy.
Okay, so your case isn't as good anymore, but now that she's voting you, she's looking worse again? It's like a double OMGUS I'm looking at here. I think Zakeri looks slightly worse by virtue of not having really said anything else though, whereas UK has put something else out since her early game, which I agree was bad.

Bardiche...well, as much as I don't like the vote on rdj, rdj's redeeming posts came after Bard's last serious post, so. When I was reading #113 though, I almost thought you were voting capt. h for a second there.

@Schezo: What was interesting about everyone's reaction to Bard's "first role declaration?"

On Helepolis, I can't really add anything that hasn't already been said. I find it especially interesting that while I would expect a newbtownie to put out at least some sort of bad case or opinion list after being prodded for opinions, Helepolis does nothing of the sort and just clams up instead. This could very much be a playstyle difference though, and I'm wary of putting too much stock into this as scum behavior. Willing to vote for him, but I want to see what his amazing contribution in the morning will be before I can decide whether that vote will be better used on him than on Dormio or someone else.

Hmm, Shadoweh. Despite the fact I don't like capt. h's behavior, I get strange vibes from her vote for him here. I'm not sure I can divine a reason for voting capt. h from that beyond "bad vibes bro" and I don't know where this accusation of fishing is coming from. You also say you "just don't feel UK is that scummy anymore," but looking back, did you ever actually say you thought UK was scummy?

Not only that, there's the previous vote on Helepolis for...not noticing there was something wrong with the votecounts, really? Unless the following counts as a case:
Quote
"So you're not watching for weirdness and you're not scumhunting and you're brushing aside your no longer lurker's argument against you as temper, so.. what are YOU going to do to contribute to town today?"
This is not a concrete statement of opinion, unless I'm not reading between the lines enough or something. You never really expanded on your reasoning for this vote, but here you seemed so confident in your vote...it's almost like you expected people to fill in the blanks for your case. It's just all very...fishy, ugh. I think this is enough to change my vote for now.
##Unvote
##Vote:Shadoweh


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #168 on: April 09, 2011, 08:04:53 AM »
What?

But...

How did...?

What are Conqueror and I suppose to do now?

The Bard's literary prowess is indeed legendary; I would honor the chance to defeat him in a post-game head-on-head sonnet-off.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #169 on: April 09, 2011, 08:18:14 AM »
Wow... I really missed a heckload of comments here, didn't I?
I still think Dormio is kinda acting weirdly, so I'll stick with my vote. I'm not sure what to think of Bardiche, though..
He seems overprotective/overreacting.


It's just.. Dormio and Bardiche are arguing against eachother, so..
« Last Edit: April 09, 2011, 08:25:20 AM by Yonowaaru »

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #170 on: April 09, 2011, 08:19:19 AM »
Could you elaborate on that? How is Dormio acting weirdly, in your view?
Same for Bardiche.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #171 on: April 09, 2011, 08:33:03 AM »
Don't edit your posts. Bad bad bad. Double post, triple post, if you must. But don't edit your posts.


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #172 on: April 09, 2011, 08:56:46 AM »
Cut by Dormio's post. >_> Looks like a bunch of throwaway comments. Doesn't look good - I await that post of yours.
Yeah, because at this point I don't really have anything on the people that I listed before.

Anyway.

Shadoweh: Lots of random roleplay from Shadoweh.
Claimed a quicktopic with Bardiche, though this is assumed to be made in jest.
This much is fine, since apparently it's in jest, however what I really don't like is #145.
Refusal to answer questions outright? Does that look town to any of you?

Bardiche: Also weird.
I don't really like how he put in fake commands.
At this point I think it may just be paranoia though.

Uncertain Kitten:
F) Caedo and Capt. H's. votes on Bard are dumb and distracting. Scumhunt please!
And the other random votes that are still lingering around aren't?
Anyway, at this point in time I think Uncertain Kitten looks the most town to me.

capt. h: I'm not quite sure what it is, but I'm getting a scummy vibe from him.
Also, he's relying on meta again, which I don't really like. EG:
Shadoweh is playing completely differently than she usually does.

rdj: He admits himself that what he's been doing looks scummy.
I don't think that much more needs to be said about that.
Instead, let us hope that his next posts fix this.

Helepolis: The Embodiment of the Lurking Devil.
He hasn't given his opinions on anyone, only stating that lurking is bad without contributing anything himself.
Let's hope this changes when he comes back.

##Unvote
##Vote Shadoweh


Warning - while you were typing 7 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Being sick is awesome.

Helepolis

  • Charisma!
  • *
  • O-ojousama!?
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #173 on: April 09, 2011, 09:10:12 AM »
I got woken up in a pretty fashioned way by Miss Izayoi.


So I am still being suspected of possible scum huh? Let me then clarify you and explain you are wrong. Because I was accused of providing little or no information/opinion, I will make this pretty extensive. So please hear it out. It may contain redundant information, but I am going to tell them (if required) anyway because it keeps the overview for me as well.

First of all, it is no doubt I am a newbie. Newbies will suffer and have trouble most likely vs the more experienced people here. You know why? Because if a newbie does not talk, he/she will be accused quickly of certain things: "You do not talk, very suspicious!" putting pressure and then hoping he slips or blows his cover. On the other hand, if a Newbie talks too much people might start making false assumptions again.  "He talks so much, his words give me scum vibes" are like few examples. Basically, a newbie is always an easy target to put pressure on. And it is obvious a few people are trying that tactic on me.

"You are not being helpful" "You are not contributing" "You do not vote enough with opinions"

That is very cute and lovely, but in none of those posts, I have seen any solid arguments justifying it. Yes, arguments are hard to create as they are all subjective. There is no such thing as 'facts' in this game. Subjective opinions are based on mere posting behaviour and words you read on your screen. There is no body language, there is no eye contact. Nothing. So why don't you all stop throwing around those cute terminology around and start talking serious business.

Well then... as promised here is my view.

The first moment the town started talking we started joke voting on each other. Logically, nobody has any idea of who is what, when and why. The joke voting went on for actually quite some time without much serious discussions or opinions being shared (I was guilty for not enough effort as well, so that is nothing new). After I switched my joke vote from rdj to Serp, I started monitoring the votes and posts.

There are 14 people. We don't know the exact number of the scums among us, but we do know Modco has confirmed it was a informed minority vs uninformed majority. Jumping to the last voting count above my post, we can see 14 votes already cast. So it is obvious scums can vote as well. This is perhaps nothing new or (duh) moment. I am just making this a complete picture, so once more apologies for redundant information or obvious ones. However, the scums know most likely who their fellow scums are. Based on this, there is a possibility they might have slip in their voting pattern. While voting patterns are extremely difficult to discover, it doesn't mean it is impossible. It can be quickly covered by a lie or other forms of deceiving

Jumping back to the first start, I started listing all vote counts and started analysing them. I will start highlighting some things I think it is worth of noting:

From 59 hours remaining, Serp voted for Uncertain Kitten. Up to this hour, his vote did not change. However, at 52 hours remaining, Zakeri joined the voting. They both have been sticking to UncertainKitten for all this time. Post #37 of Zakeri is the only vote post he had. Later on, he did not clarify anything why he had voted. In post #89 he claims he has voted for UK because she is active lurking. No strong arguments were given. His defence included his last game behaviour, which isn't helping. Post #137 we see Zakeri once more putting extra emphasis on UK. Seems like he is trying to draw more votes on her, but again no strong arguments. Finally, post #158 , Zakeri dashes in an explanation in detail on his voting. Now just because Zakeri was a lurking scum last game, doesn't mean anything. You could be a scum right this moment as well and use that story to put people on false track.

UK on the other hand has voted for Zakeri since 41 hours and less with her reply in #146 And we can see some clashing going on here with what seems to me more hate than grounded reasons.

Looking at Serp, he casted his vote for UK at reply 35 with the reason "UK trying too hard to fulfil RVS meta". In reply #118, Serp explains why he casted his vote and why he is sticking with it. The reason is pretty straight forward and makes sense in my opinion. A vote on somebody's head would make it possible to sit back and watch what the "victim" is going to do. Furthermore, Serp has not posting anything else. He is calm, straight forward and seems to have a plan to uncover certain information.

I seem to be noticing some triangle going on here with Serp Zakeri and UK

Continuing...

Let us look at the people like Caedo, Bardiche, Yonowaaru and Conqueror first. Yonowaaru had posted #39 sticking to his vote with what seems a random vote. Post #47 confirms he is random voting and sticking with the group. My question is, what group?. He was the first to vote on Caedo and has not given any information about it. Even rdj is questioning his vote in reply #75. At reply 165, Conqueror also does the same and calls out on Yono to make a serious post and vote. So far, nothing yet.

Which brings me to conqueror. In reply #165, he was hoping people to bandwagon with his self vote so he could leave day 1. Interesting comment there. I need to think about this some more after this post. In #167, Conqueror finally comes out with an elaborative post on various events. And points out, I haven't performed as they would expect from a newbie. Again, see my opening lines in this post.

Caedo finally made several posts through out the day. But somehow I cannot connect any of them. I don't see any red-line going through. Cadeo random voted on me first, then changed his vote to Hanged Hourai, eventually after some sticking it got switched to Bardiche. Looking at the reasoning: it was a most likely punishment vote on Bardiche for fake command using.

But where is Yonowaaru? Nothing...

Brings me over to Bardiche: Reply #106 , 108 , 109 and 113 he kind of becomes extremely defensive and is explaining more than actually what was asked before. Especially in #113, he claims "Sometimes townies need to hide things from other townies." and "Or I'm a town investigative role who doesn't want scum to know he can do public investigations. Don't consider everything only from "scum needs to hide things!" perspectives. Sometimes townies need to hide things from other townies.".
AFAIK, Nobody asked for just clarification. Why is he explaining he might be trying to manipulate certain people or playing a certain game?

About capt h., he did a few vote hopping in the beginning. Targeting random people but after 44 hours, sticks to Bardiche after Caedo had voted for him. Particularly also jumps over at me in reply #116, speaking for Hanged Hourai for no reason. In #128, capt.h seems to be pushing, trying to put pressure on me for giving an opinion on everybody. A summary as proposed. But through out the entire thread, Capt.h hasn't been contributing any thing either. Stirring up people, jumping into posts and speaking for others. It seems his tempered posting style caused the last voting count to include Shezo and Rdj and Shadoweh voting against capt h.

Now what particular is interesting here for me is Shadoweh's (post #163) confirms wanting capt.h out and intends to start a band wagon.The question is will people do that? Three votes on one person has been the highest vote count. Especially time is now ticking out, people will perhaps become desperate. An interesting event. If I look at Shezo, in reply #87 he says there is nothing to talk about. #135 he seems to have carefully analysed all the talking and comes out with an some what similar (imo) judgement on capt.h. Finally rdj clearly in post #138 states his vote and has somewhat similar opinion on capt. h as well. Now this is interesting.

Finally, Hanged Hourai has so far been outputting tempered posts as well. Sounds more like panic in my eyes than rather informative posts, which most people did better than Hanged hourai. Post #112, he makes a summary of his own findings but the funny thing is. None of them are connected to what made him vote on me. He jumps the gun, places and vote and then outputs 3 lines of loose "arguments". But then, continues the summary with opinions on other people though there isn't any thing else. However, in #140, he places a direct question to Shadoweh, which Shadoweh bluntly smacks away with her reply.

Oh yea, Neoserela, bandwagoned Zakeri and then disappeared for more than 24h, What happens then?



Did I handled everybody? I think I did. Now checking the final voting count with at that time, 39 hours remaining:
Votes against: Zakeri, Rdj, Serp, Dormio, UK, Bardiche, Hele and capt.h all got votes against them. (8 people being suspected)
Not targetted: Shadoweh, Yono, Conqueror, Schezo, Hanged Hourai and NeoSerela. (6 people)

##Unvote
##Vote capt. h

Many of you will consider this bandwagoning. Let me tell you: You are wrong. Even if Shadoweh has outputted to get rid of you, that isn't my reason. The minority is informed. The scums know who their buddies are. Right now most likely they are trying hard to prevent obvious groupings.

However, we can see some groupings going on. Particular the people who I set my eyes on are: Bardiche, Capt. h and Shezo. However, Capt. h's behaviour, posting aggression makes me wonder: "Why". If you are a townie, you wouldn't be cause this kind of a mess to everybody. Sticking your nose in other people's business as well as spouting random words. You and few others kept on performing pressure to do something. Hoping they would slip up? ** smirks **

However, I have my eyes on Bardiche and Shezo as well. Especially Bardiche, who has just like you, started suddenly post fast and extremely defensive. Especially outputting posts which nobody asked for. So far, I am sticking with Capt. h. The following hours will most likely bring us more knowledge. I am still little puzzled about Yonowaaru.

A general note to people among us.
Just because I am a newbie here, does not mean I will go quickly and make desperate posts. The pressure people put on me didn't change my behaviour. As promised I came up with an extensive personal analysis It took some time, but I simply needed the mental time to think it out. Being a newbie perhaps makes it look like I have no experience, but that is no reason for forcing me to hurry up.

Now, it is time for a cup of Earl Grey.

Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #174 on: April 09, 2011, 09:18:14 AM »
About the group: I meant the group of people voting. I could've waited to vote, if I'd wanted to.


I'll post more thoroughly later, I'm not used to this manner of just looking at people.

Helepolis

  • Charisma!
  • *
  • O-ojousama!?
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #175 on: April 09, 2011, 09:20:56 AM »
Request to  Modco and Kitte4Mod
Would it be too much asked if I requested alphabetic order for the vote counting list posts? It would make it easier for us all.  The list order changes when a person is not targeted and kind of confusing sometimes. I don't want to strain you too much, but just A-Z order for the targeted people would make me grateful. The people voting are easier to spot anyway.

Pesco

  • Trickster Rabbit Tewi
  • *
  • Make a yukkuri and take it easy with me
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #176 on: April 09, 2011, 10:01:07 AM »
Request to  Modco and Kitte4Mod
Would it be too much asked if I requested alphabetic order for the vote counting list posts? It would make it easier for us all.  The list order changes when a person is not targeted and kind of confusing sometimes. I don't want to strain you too much, but just A-Z order for the targeted people would make me grateful. The people voting are easier to spot anyway.

Denied. You're free to keep your own votecounts.

If you edit your post you will be modkilled and modkills are punishments. I.e. your team gets fucked over

Serp

  • It's all about overwhelming force and irresistible style
  • And in a pinch, style can slide
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #177 on: April 09, 2011, 10:51:18 AM »
UK's post makes my eyes bleed, but doesn't make my brain implode.  There are enough opinions burried in the wall to render my old case of active lurking obsolete.

##Unvote

I don't like the way that Zakeri's case on UK says both that she doesn't have any opinions and that he doesn't like her opinions.  That's called a contradiction, and reads as far more of an OMGUS than her case on him.

##Vote: Zakeri

capt. h:  Just because things happen in the game thread doesn't mean they're related to the game.  Sad but true.  Posting just to point out that something confuses you doesn't give any information to the town, which means it's just more white noise added to rereads.

The case on capt. h is weak, relying more on anti-town play than on scum intent.  In the absence of better cases, that'll do for a vote, but it's also a very easy target for opportunistic scum.  In particular, Schezo's vote doesn't strike me as particularly seeking a scumflip from capt. h, so that's where I'd put my vote if it weren't on Zakeri.
[15:13] <Sana> >:<

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #178 on: April 09, 2011, 11:14:07 AM »
rdj, I have seen the light, I was touched by your excellence and am no longer convinced you're scum! ##UNVOTE

FWIW, it's better to be bad and try than to be good but not even try. I don't think anyone's ever good at Mafia games, we're all just fumbling around trying to untangle the mess of deception spread out before us.

THAT SAID, no, bad town isn't as bad as scum. I'd rather lynch scum.


On Shadoweh, I love her, want to take her to my quick topic for some Unlimited Gambit Works, and I have no idea by what she means by that piece. I can say I have received no link to a QT with her, so it's not that at the very least. I'm thus far assuming she's having fun and isn't scum, but rather soft-claiming a name.

I don't get the hubbub about actions I might or might not have taken, I've been pretty opaque.

Zakeri needs to rage less and post more valid cases. His case on UK is not valid.
##Vote: Zakeri

Voting UK for being UK is incredibly boring. She always does this. Last game, she did the exact same thing. The game before that, exact same thing. I know because normally I'm the one voting her for it, but y'know, not today, bro. Because I have seen the light and UK is totally being UK instead of being scum or doing this active lurking hodgepodge.

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: Darker than Black Mafia (Day 1)
« Reply #179 on: April 09, 2011, 03:21:32 PM »
Conqueror: Do you still find Dormio scummy at all at this moment? On capt.h, "Following really bizarre and generally unproductive lines of inquiry." is a good short version of my feelings, but I'll expand. By fishing I mean both rolefishing and fishing for reasons to vote. I can summarize all his posts as 'that looks weird, why are you being weird, vote for weirdness!' I'm not going to link you posts, you can analyze him yourself. Until you mentioned it I'd forgotten who he was voting for. For being annoying. His later posts didn't tell me they agreed with his vote. It feels less to me like he's trying to find inconsistencies in scum and more like he's trying to find a townie worth voting for. Helepolis seemed to be implying that he was going to sit back and watch for lurkers and scum abilities in lieu of persuing the active townies. A vote being stolen is usually an anti-town move and it bothered me that he wasn't paying attention. It's possible I misread his intentions. His last post isn't stellar but feels more weird then anything. I'll be addressing UK further down.

Dormio: So anything else strike you as scum-intended from what I'm doing? Your case makes me wish I had more votes so I could give you one. Actually your post is more reportery then anything. I would appeal to the Unlimited Dayvig God to shoot you right now but I've learned to be careful what you wish for. Instead I'd ask you expand on how I might be scum.

Serp: So, did you see good opinions, bad opinions, nice opinions in UK's post? Your vote implies you liked what you saw but your words sound like an excuse to change sides.

I personally haven't got a read either way between Zakeri and UK. Right now they could both be town or scum. I think the heavy language is coloring my perceptions since I see the words as scummy. I might not have directly said I felt UK was scummy but I don't tend to argue with people I think are town about opinions and I don't think she answered my question. If you did please remind me. Need more input from Zak to assess his motives.

Yonowaaru: Your avatar is nowhere near cute enough to get away with your lack of anything substantial. Please provide before the day is over. Stop editing your posts.


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia