And this is why day 1 isn't supposed to last 160 hours, now everyone is just starting to yell at eachother and we don't have any solid info to help decide which side of the yelling (or if neither side) is more likely to be scum. At this point, quite honestly, we're degrading into something a bit retarded. I could probably be persuaded to vote for like half of the players at the moment out of almost wifom-y logic (Although 100% honestly if I had to vote for someone I felt was obvtown just to get any lynch today, I would)
I see absolutely no reason for me to move my vote off PX at this stage, so jump on this wagon please.
Uh. lol. "I don't see anything wrong with my case on this guy so everyone kill him plz"
As stated, it's just a personal opinion/theory on how people would react to lynch, not something I'd bank on and I was hoping for more opinions on that. So tell me, what EXACTLY would YOU have said if you were getting lynched as a town?
What? Why does it matter what someone says if they're getting lynched? At it's best it's meta-filled wifom, your question seems almost anti-productive to be asked because it's continuing the conversation in a direction absolutely useless to go in.
And I've never in my Mafia career been day lynch, I dare you to make it my first.
...okay, now you're just getting arrogant. It's kind of annoying.
Too bad this initiative failed to lead into the rest of the day, when you basically decided to shut up and not contribute.
I'm afraid it wasn't really my choice whether I wanted to post or not at that time, but you can't know whether I'm telling the truth about that or not, so your point stands.
About your paragraph over RVS, Rou, I honestly don't feel that the advantage gained over not actively ending RVS is terribly significant, especially considering that doing what Bard did pretty much ensures that, if you do end up ending RVS, you also have an easy target falling into your lap. How Bard ended RVS requires someone to argue against what he did, which he can then counter.
RVS never lasts all of D1 whether someone intentionally tries to instantly end it or not, because if it starts lasting too long, that in itself becomes a reason for it to stop because people start going "Oh hell naw" and etc. It baffles me that you're arguing what Bard did is indeed incredibly townie. If it was so incredibly townie, that would only make it more likely for scum to do it anyway, as being labelled "incredibly townie" at the cost of having a <12 hour rvs as opposed to a possibly 24~ hour rvs is by far worth it. You're overestimating what town gains with a shorter rvs and underestimating what a scum!Bard would be gaining in exchange.
Because scumhunting is better than defense?
Yeah, this is true, but that does NOT mean to just completely ignore it when someone makes a case on you. It just means don't spend all your time defending yourself and less time scumhunting. You should still be defending yourself at least a little bit, unless there's not any good way to defend yourself in the first place.
Would like to vote Bard for misrep spam, tunnelling on people who voted him, and because I can easily see why scum would have done what he's done.
Would like to vote Rou over obsessive Bard defense that IMO goes into badlogic territory that even Bard himself has said he doesn't agree with.
Wouldn't mind voting Rev. PX, FFM, and Affinity IMO look fine right now. Doll is ughnew although I do sympathize a little with his 132.
That about sums up how I feel about people at the moment. Will
##Vote:Bardiche, although since the Rou lynch looks much more likely to happen today, I'll probably switch over to voting Rou before I go to sleep today.
