>BT did not flip Scum
>Scum left you alive
Yeaaaah, gg Scum, and fuck you.
1 - Bard changed his claim after hammer and the post wasn't deleted.
Up until now, Bard always said that the reason he didn't post about his track/not track was because of a post restriction. However, now it appears that he could have claimed all along, but didn't want to get himself shot. This was actually the response I was fishing for when I said Bard wasn't defending himself properly. Unfortunately he didn't say it until after hammer so I couldn't respond to it. So I don't like it.
I didn't say I didn't post about that because of the restriction. What are you imagining now? Are you saying you're fishing for me giving a response that might have gotten me modkilled?
So from my perspective it's either Shadoweh, who's earnt a golden award for interactions with CF7 and Zakeri, or Sky Paladin, who'd have to be a double-killing Scum on being motivated.
I'm inclined off-hand to say it's Sky Paladin because I Believe In Shadoweh, and I seriously dislike his arguments from the other day with such gems as, "Bard didn't defend himself" and now "I said that because I wanted him to tell me whether or not he could track"; a Sky Paladin as Scum stands everything to gain from knowing the answer to that moreso than a Town Sky Paladin does. I remember he at some point posted a list of possibilities and I want to propose that a Scum!Sky Paladin intentionally left out an option:
Scum were confident they would not be tracked.
If I bought his Vanilla claim, then it's likely I wouldn't want to track him. (It'd be a waste.) After I revealed that I still had intended that Sky Paladin's been intent on fishing about my role and I am distrustful. A double-killing Scum on Motivation sounds absolutely ridiculous but this is Dormio we're talking about, and all of this makes 100% sense in my head.
I'm going to reread both of you before I place any vote.
I didn't do anything tonight.