Author Topic: Medaka Box Mafia - Night 4 (Read 74541 times)

SB · « **Reply #840 on:** March 16, 2014, 11:41:05 AM »

Mine is a minus. It's also worth noting that I haven't fullclaimed (if people want me to do that now, I guess I could?)

Shadoweh · « **Reply #841 on:** March 16, 2014, 11:47:46 AM »

Zak picks up: Extra kills, the ability to be unlynchable, sharing actions
Rawr picks up: The ability not to action for 2 phases

Did you roleblock Bard? :V

SB · « **Reply #842 on:** March 16, 2014, 11:51:42 AM »

What I thought I was when I first read my role pm:
"ok i'm a 1x activated lynchproof"
What I turned out to be when I reread it:
"wtf i'm a jailkeeper+1x nl gov?"

Hence my confusion.

I blocked Sky N1 and Bard last night.

Shadoweh · « **Reply #843 on:** March 16, 2014, 12:36:51 PM »

Serela, is your voteblock abnormal or a minus?

That does make sense with what you were hinting at before. Why did you block Bard?

SB · « **Reply #844 on:** March 16, 2014, 01:35:49 PM »

Because I was suspicious of him (detailed here) pretty much and unlike Conq I didn't really feel like there was a reason for him to be town.

I also want Serela to voteblock every day in case he's scum so we can block him from using a night action if his role works like mine.

Serela · « **Reply #845 on:** March 16, 2014, 01:51:45 PM »

My power is an Abnormality.

BT · « **Reply #846 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:08:34 PM »

Zak obviously had no reason not to shoot. It's TOO suspicious so much that I wonder why scum would ever claim something like that unless they really really wanted to stick to their Backup claim and decided to ##fuckit?

Notice that Abnormal abilities are basically passive abilities, as far as I'm aware. That's what's weird about Dan's role - even if rawr got it, it would still serve no purpose as rawr wouldn't have used any "actions" at all. Is this another functional vanilla setup? It's not, but it's almost. No doc no cop no nothing.

BT · « **Reply #847 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:10:10 PM »

Oh okay I missed the new page. So Abnormal =/= passive. Mine's abnormal, obviously.

BT · « **Reply #848 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:11:27 PM »

I'm confused, since when was SB a jailkeeper? Why Sky N1?

BT · « **Reply #849 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:15:28 PM »

By the way...

Quote from: Shadoweh on March 16, 2014, 12:03:20 AM

CF7 says SB claimed ascetic, mixup with Bt's role, what does it mean?!

I forgot about this. It sounds like a pretty solid towntell because SB and I are two-letter acronym brothers and he probably would have enough tact as scum to notice he thought his scumbuddy pubclaimed ascetic.

BT · « **Reply #850 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:18:18 PM »

Quote from: CF7 on March 08, 2014, 06:22:54 PM

How should i say. It just feels weird. Call it guts. For example SB claimed ascetic. Rawr says that claim is weird based on Rawr's own role. There might be 2 ascetics, sure, but on other hand Rawr never said that he's ascetic. Then there were posts about figuring out roles of some people. It's D1 no info and it's rolemadness so any role can has any alignment and all that. Maybe he's just extremely knowlegable of Medaka Box, i don't know. And all this. I dunno. As i said, weird.

On second thought, he obviously means me when he says "rawr says that claim is weird", I think. So basically we're asking if his slip-up in acronyms means anything. Maybe. Not as solid, though, unfortunately.

Sky_Paladin · « **Reply #851 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:20:39 PM »

I can see that SB turbolynch on me day 1 is consistent with jailing me the following day, but I don't understand why SB continued with the Lets-Lynch-Sky on day 2 when he would have known 100% I didn't make the hit on night 1.

Sky_Paladin · « **Reply #852 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:21:20 PM »

Quote

I can see that SB turbolynch on me day 1 is consistent with jailing me the following ~~day~~night

I have to stop posting so late at night, geez.

Serela · « **Reply #853 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:24:17 PM »

Quote from: Sky_Paladin on March 16, 2014, 02:20:39 PM

I don't understand why SB continued with the Lets-Lynch-Sky on day 2 when he would have known 100% I didn't make the hit on night 1.

Because there'd probably be -two- scum left still so you wouldn't be cleared by any means?

Sky_Paladin · « **Reply #854 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:32:01 PM »

Ah I guess it's okay. I went for a Zak lynch last game after I detective checked him in case he was godfather.

Mmmmmm~

I don't know. I feel like SB blocking me is consistent with what he said but I also feel like it's a scum move for some reason.

Well I should sleep before I have another train of garbage coming out. Goodnight~

BT · « **Reply #855 on:** March 16, 2014, 02:36:00 PM »

SB's claim is honestly enough to clear him to some degree IMO. Though I can't be as good a judge of this as Shadoweh is since she knows the few roles that didn't claim. HEY SHADOWEH. See if there's a lack of roles besides SB's. If there is he's obvtown.

Shadoweh · « **Reply #856 on:** March 16, 2014, 03:26:32 PM »

Well, if you think about the things SB and Zakeri have claimed:
SB claimed a no-lynch role that would have severely screwed over the CF7 lynch. Then again, as scum I wouldn't be surprised if that role had a not during Day 1 qualifier. ..Or not in LYLO.
It's kind of not a role scum could be allowed to get their hands on? The JK part he didn't have to hint at or claim, considering he was already an outted PR.
See above for what Zak claimed, also realize that Zak just claimed he had a Janitor or Strongman he could have used last night and didn't. I realize the alternative is that he's just lying about having a vig at all but this seems like a bad time to confirm oneself as scum for tomorrow, doesn't it? (Then again considering what we did as scum together I shouldn't give him too much credit.. >.> ) After yesterday I kind of think as scum using a Janitor on me for max confusion would have been my plot.

I hate the world today. I can think of reasons to clear literally everyone.

Dan, your claim doesn't make any sense considering your comments earlier about wanting to receive gifts from SB and your soft-counterclaiming of BT's Ascetic power. Plz show up to help break the game, I am dealing with a pick the least Townie person situation here and you're probably the weakest townread I have at the moment.

Bardiche · « **Reply #857 on:** March 16, 2014, 03:35:16 PM »

I don't even what of this claim. FWIW if I die I also pass on an Abnormality.

Bardiche · « **Reply #858 on:** March 16, 2014, 03:35:29 PM »

Or would have, if Rawr was still alive.

SB · « **Reply #859 on:** March 16, 2014, 03:37:18 PM »

Should we just finish the massclaim off at this point? I don't think we have anything valuable left to hide at this point.

Also BBM claimed vig in Utena when he couldn't prove it, it could just be scum getting desperate.

Shadoweh · « **Reply #860 on:** March 16, 2014, 03:58:47 PM »

I'm pretty sure we did finish off the massclaim. :> I claimed to myself in private over PM and I'm p sure I'm obvtown so I'm not gonna lynch myself today.

SB · « **Reply #861 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:10:39 PM »

Do you know what Bard's full role is?

ActionDan · « **Reply #862 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:17:36 PM »

I know there's a gift giver somewhere and why would the mod punish them for having mine and BT's role. etc.

ActionDan · « **Reply #863 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:18:34 PM »

I also hasten to say that it's possible that the scum team is Sky/Shadoweh. One of them needs death before lylo

ActionDan · « **Reply #864 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:19:18 PM »

Also you should shoot Zak. Vigs that don't shoot the first time they can should die

Shadoweh · « **Reply #865 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:27:31 PM »

Fucking LOL.
I wonder what I would do in this situation as scum. Probably write something about how convincing the case was on Zak and lynch him without thinking about it, seeing as if Town his role is positively frightening.
Why would a gift giver be punished by your role? Presumably your role would actually have a purpose if you received a power?

SB: I feel answering this question might incriminate me! He's been crumbing some things pretty heavily (that he should be ashamed of if true)

Bardiche · « **Reply #866 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:36:26 PM »

In during role shens and rolefishing.

Dan, why is (one of) Sky/Shadoweh scum?

Zakeri's claim is weird. Please return and tell us all about why you did not use your kill Night 1.

The claim mostly confuses me because of so much shit scum could've done otherwise that it makes me go

Bardiche · « **Reply #867 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:37:09 PM »

shadoweh pls quiet

BT · « **Reply #868 on:** March 16, 2014, 04:39:11 PM »

No, it's definitely possible scum had the Minus Backup and just weren't arsed to fake a claim themselves. Horrible decision, but still. (If not scum, there's the third option.)

Serela · « **Reply #869 on:** March 16, 2014, 07:02:08 PM »

I really don't want to reread this game multiple times so I'm just reading the entire thing once.

Zakeri's these are my scumreads from greatest to least, let's votepark number 3 serela[/ur] post is really the only thing I have against him.

The entire time I'm rereading D1 it's just "I want to vote SB for all of this" but I can't really pick out anything that's bad, it's just everything is kinda eh and rubs me the wrong way >_> The only real thing is how he constantly goes "but I'm lazy so meh" or "lazy so I'll do it later" and kind of cruises through most of d1 with small comments here and there.

Dan is powerlurk, so, welp. ;_; His personal roleshens seem like from town but that's it, and it could be totally faked.

Kind of leaning town on Bard. I'unno. His play would make sense from scum, but it feels like it's legit.

well here's zak again

Quote

I think Town!Serela's alternative was to just not use it to begin with. Also I think I eventually turned towards the way of thinking you spouted at me about how Serela used his role. I think the reason he used it on BT was as a panic button to get some sort of roleclear cred, and of course he couldn't use it on the only guy tunneling on him because that would be hyper-self-defencism which would only cause people to look at him more suspiciously.

this is semantics I guess? But I think the notion that I shouldn't even bother testing BT's ascetic when there's no reason not to just seems really silly. So instead Zak paints it as a scummy action? Seems kinda weird

but... I like his big d2 post. And he shied away from how the o4rfish wagon was going for legitimate reasons

bt/shadoweh are obvtown and conq is town, skypal's heel-face-turn since d2 has been DEFINITELY A THING, and Sacchi is... I... I don't know. Reading more of D2, yeah, I'd definitely rather not lynch Zak today. SB/Dan/Sacchi are the only people I want to see go right now. Zak roleshens can be dealt with tomorrow, and Bard would be someone I'd go for in like, 3p lylo when my other scum targets were already gone.