Turns out Zak ISO was super easy because he has exactly 8 of what I consider content posts out of a total 17 posts in this game. That's even less than ActionDan.
RVS for NNR, switches to Rawr shortly after after quoting 'policy lynches'.
Weird response/quote of ActionDan in RVS.
Discussion of BT's ascetic claim. Implies the best way to test BT's claim is to vig him. Defends lack of reads on Serela.
Vote for CF7. Fairly reasonable looking.
Defends CF7 vote/soft coaching.
Struggling what to think of this post. It looks like a fairly lengthy post but I don't think it actually states anything of merit. States that he is going to relook at Serela, which connects the next post to this one and redeems it a little bit.
Vote for Serela and scumpicks CF7, Sky, and Serela. What's the reason for unvoting one of your scum picks who is at L-2? Looks like a serious case of scum hopping off their buddy but still trying to get wagon cred by saying that wagon is scummy. "I don't feel like CF7 is going to answer to any more questions just from keeping a pressure vote on him, but I'm still willing to switch back if he doesn't find new scumreads to talk about." Zak says CF7 isn't going to answer questions from pressure but he will put his vote back there if CF7 doesn't answer questions. Then why take your vote off in the first place? Never revoted for CF7.
Called out by somebody for his bad vote on Serela. This is a really bad non content post that does not defend his stance. "To be honest, my vote on Serela was kind of a votepark at the time, mostly because like I said I gave up hope of Cf7 improving."
First major content post of the game (now in day 2). Asks SB about his hyperbole. The main content is actually scumhunting on SB and BT, gives a better case on SB but votes BT. Would slam if either Zak or SB later on flip red.
More back and forth with SB.
This looks like another non-content post disguised as a bigger post.
Votes for SB. SB actually looked really scummy at that stage. Inconclusive.
***
That's all.
Zak has one actual scumhunt post -> BT. He has had a very low presence with a tiny amount of posts, and little interaction with other players.
The main alert is his Serela vote on day 1 despite naming CF7 as a scumpick and then shifting off his vote. When he was called on it for vote parking he admitted it was vote parking until it was time to revote CF7, except he never did.
I'm struggling to see any actual *effort*, but if we were lynching due to lack of effort, Dan would be up first. I think Zak is more scummy than Dan. It's hard to make any useful conclusions because Zak has said so very little.
But compared to the other players I have ISO'd, with super shiny Conqueror and good looking BT, Zak looks pretty scummy. Would lynch.
