Sorry I hope I didn't spoil it
Anyway, from my perspective, the colored thing looks a little different:
Shadoweh (6): Sky_Paladin, Validon98, Polaris,
NekoNekoRex, Darkninjaabc, Dormio
Kilgamayan (3):
Mitsuki,
Shadoweh,
Cheez8NekoNekoRex (1):
SBNot Voting (1):
KilgamayanNote that, for one, Sky Paladin isn't colored green on some whim. Why was Paladin even green in the first place?
The three blue names are the three involved in that "same alignment" stuff. All three could be town, or two of them could be scum.
If the case is that all of these people are town, then all of the members of the scumteam were voting for Shadoweh, which I wouldn't have too much trouble believing. Perhaps they avoided focusing on Kilga because they were worried it would lead to Kilga focusing on them?
If two of these three aren't town, though, that complicates matters. I see I've been cut by Validon though, and expanding on that right now would make this post take very long.
So, Validon...
Alright, starting off with things, Cheez for the beginning of D1 spent a lot of time arguing with Dark. While I don't exactly trust Dark, all he did was just argue over Dark's opinions on things.
...Your point? I had nothing else to do aside from joining in the RVS.
If you weren't even sure to begin with, then why bother with the entire case? It's just babbling that in the end means you aren't doing much else. Before then you yelled at Dormio for his earliest posts (which, come on, it was RVS, people can make posts like that, which is why I don't take them into consideration really), which... isn't much either.
Had I not bothered with the entire case (aka had a small discussion with him), I would not have drawn enough out of Darkie for me to establish an opinion on him. Are you seriously taking that earliest Dormio vote into account? That was me making a random baseless vote, coming up with some joke reason to put behind it, and presenting it as if I actually believed it. In other words, like you said, it was RVS.
Okay, that last sentence really bugs me. I think by the way the rest of the post this was from that statement in parenthesis was after Serela cut you, but why mention it...? You did a similar thing with a previous post where you were mentioning me not having an opinion yet and then pretty much went "(oh he still doesn't have one too bad)." It doesn't give me warm fuzzy feelings.
I'm not playing to give people warm fuzzy feelings. As for why I mentioned it, it was probably to let Serela know that I'm going to suspect him too if he doesn't shape up his act or something. I'm fairly certain several people have done the same to various people, including me.
That unwillingness to get off like that REALLY urks me as well. It's like you're saying " WHOOPS I FAILED TO PIN A CASE ON HIM GOTTA DO SOMETHING ELSE NOW."
Do something else? The first thing I did after this was to go back through Darkie's posts to see whether I well and truly believed he was scum. I don't see why that unwillingness should irk you. If anything, it should instill confidence. What if, instead, I had suddenly dropped all suspicion of Darkie and actually DID move on to something else, just like that? That sounds a lot scummier than what I did here, even when you try to make out what I did to be scummy. You're searching too hard, pal.
Yeah... I don't like the fact that you openly admit you can't support most of these. A read without support isn't a read, it's guts and guts aren't a good basis for a case.
Well, at least now I know what qualifies as a read. Thanks~
Once again, what would you prefer I do? Dredge up some BS reasoning before making mention of each of my hunches? I tried that several times and it didn't stop people from calling my cases unsupported.
So you didn't like the wagon yet... didn't mind if it went through. If that doesn't scream scum I don't know what does.
A quote from Serela that Cheez quoted, which sums up my opinion on Cheez's interaction with Serela up until now. That whole "I don't like the wagon buuuuut I don't care if it goes through so I'll vote it anyways" really bugs me. If you don't like a wagon, don't vote for it, simple as that.
Still urgh.
Yeah, "urgh" is right. Serela was a very unconvincing town read for me at that point. Serela said that after I completely misinterpreted something he said, so of course what I said didn't make any sense. And there's so little context to that last statement. I don't even recognize that line, so I don't know what you expect me to say about it.
So you unvoted and went to another suspicion of yours... because you thought it would only be fair for other people to jump on that wagon anyways? Sounds more like a "I'm getting off of this wagon so that I won't get dragged along with it!" attitude.
Serela voted himself. I didn't want Serela to be lynched if the town couldn't produce enough people to lynch Serela without his help.
I get that you think I'm scum and all but you're assuming I'm scum first and proving it second. You've pointed out several scumtells here that aren't scumtells at all, and from the sound of things you're just getting started, huh? Hey, how about a deal: Next time, don't refer to something as a scumtell if it isn't a scumtell. It'd make this a lot easier on me.
Cut by the D2&3 part, and it's only one quote long! Amazing!
Will you stop getting hung up on my wording? Coming from somebody who was at that point very conflicted as to whether somebody claiming to have a major power role was telling the truth or not, yes, Darkie somehow incriminating himself beyond a shadow of a doubt WOULD be very convenient in clearing up the immense amounts of doubt that were plaguing me.
At this point I'm willing to brush your argument to the side and get back to other business because it's laughably weak, even by my standards.
