SB: Couldn't tell you why. I guess it's because his posts seem... well, very self-assured, if I'm being perfectly honest. Not sure why that would be something I distrust, except maybe it makes me feel like people are being played or distracted from certain parts of arguments because of it. I can't really support this very well though which is a sign that SB is very good at being scum and we should lynch him now! That, or I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely.
Dark: I want to think he's a misguided townie but he just doesn't stop.
How does my confidence distract people from arguments exactly?
What makes you think misguided townie?
I like how multiple people have fewer votes than names attached. FOR SCIENCE! ##Unvote, ##Vote: Kilgamayan
SB are you Carthrat in disguise ?_?
Was this just to test the votals?
Manix = a guy on SF who also has a Kirigiri avatar and makes a lot of short posts in succession, like Polly did.
Cheez is not null anymore, and my policy is to lynch nulls.
What? This doesn't make any sense. We don't even know if we have a Cop or a Vig or whatever to clean up the scummy people, for all we know our PRs could be made up of like, Doc and Empowerer or some stupid shit like that. We lynch scummy people to lynch the mafia, and so that the mafia has a harder time at *YLO, even if they flip town.
Note that my stance has never changed but just that there's no imminient risk of quickhammer I assume that its safe to Vote.
And guys you really want scum to quickend d1 right.
Validon can very well be killed before he can retaliate so there.
I would rather lose a townie to a quickhammer if it means the scumteam out themselves for it. Why are you so conscious about a quickhammer anyway?
But I think I'd rather vote Dormio for his eagerness to vote me for noncontribution while I've stated I was about to make a post of it and then even showed some sign of apparently being in the middle of really getting it done.
This is a pretty bad vote reason and just looks like a thinly veiled OMGUS. The rest of the post is essentially spent on Serela talking about how he can't read Dark and nullreads. Same deal with Validon.
I think Serela/Polly being Maf/Maf is basically impossible, but Town/Maf or Town/Town are both possible so yeah. No use dwelling on it. Trying to game the setup probably won't work out well so yeah.
And back to my policy of d1 scumhunting.
I guess some people are confused on why we should lynch nulls when we could.
Null reads are most likely town power roles
i
what
you want us to lynch our PRs
ok
This doesn't mean I stop trusting my guts, having someone to jump out and defend you despite the person in question has not even made a response is pretty scummy, plus, the situation back then was basically me telling everyone to drop the wagon temporarily and give shadoweh time to response, having that cut off by someone else (cheez) is outright weird. Paranoid scum can explain that in the form of wanting to dispell more suspiction from forming round his scumpal when it is still so early with an apparant lack of material.
How does someone defending another player make the player they're defending scummy? Scum can buddy up to townies and townies can defend scum who they think are town. You're using this against Shadoweh when she has no control over what Cheez does and I don't like it.
I mean null reads are most likely targets of town power roles.
Null reads alone can toy with town psychology by just not posting or with minimal material.
Okay, no. The only type of role that would really consider targetting a nullread is an investigative role. The Doctor wants to be on his townreads. Theoretical Hooker wants to be on his scumreads. The vig wants to shoot scummy people. Inactives will get replaced or modkilled, there's no use dwelling on that now.
Vote is staying on Validon, I have no reason to see him as a townie right now.