Also by the way Zakeri how is that reread going
I'm working on it.
I guess with the wagons the way they are, there's no point procrastinating on it.
@Raitaki: Dormio is null leaning scum for me. Easily would vote him to secure lynch.
Re: Serela
85 - Says Raikaria's logic was terribad, but not scum
132 - Votes Raikaria for continuing with same terribad logic.
It's strange that you would accept the logic as townsourced, and then turn around and put a vote on him while explaining why the same logic is anti-town.
Also strange is that you tell Raikaria to find reasons for voting someone that was posting, exactly one post after he did just that, which you immediately discarded on basis of "I don't want to think about it right now."
Can you explain what changed between those posts to cause that reaction beside "Not taking stock in RVS votes"?
202 - What the hell happened to Kilga?
203 - Serela talks about why I could be scum, including laughing at my reasons for voting Affinity, which included punishing for "Textbook scummy" and for using excuse-like-reasoning to vote Raikaria that I didn't think was even true. Then he tries to start a wagon on Affinity by saying he only jumped on Raikaria for a case that was only one sentence long. So let me puzzle this out - You didn't like my weird point against him, which means you didn't object to anything he said, just the fact that he only posted one line? Even weirder is that you spend most of the post calling Raikaria scum, so why did you vote affinity if he was voting for the right choice in your opinion?
As for Day 2 ... none of it really seems as bad to me directly. The waffle and fluffiness on the case against me seems genuine serely, and the point on why Affinity might not have been the best investigation for me anyways only seems suspicious because edible pointed out to me that BT pointed it out.
We wouldn't be having this much of a lurker problem is people stopped shouting 'We're not lynching X today' all the time. Because while we're not lynching said person, they're also not posting.
Zak seriously needs to die.
It really hurts to be cut by something like this while making a post like this.
As I went through, it occurred to me that I never actually mentioned my read of Dormio outside of casing the case on myself weak.
But the most basic thing is that everything Dormio has posted has been phoned in.
I was frustrated at Raikaria for dropping the case on Dormio to pursue something on (at the time I posted) Edible when Dormio hadn't provided a reasonable explanation of his vote (Of course, now that I've read Raikaria again, I understand he was just pushing in every logical direction, so apologies for the rage). I don't really believe that he "didn't find anything worthy" in Nameless's posts when he never even commented on what was in the posts between his 165 (where his reasoning to vote Nameless was) and the post he voted, 257.
I already mentioned that his case on me didn't provide any reasoning besides "It feels like he's faking it"
In general, He just seems to be a useless, dead limb that we might as well cut off.
It's hard to decide between the two of them. Serela's day one is more offensive to me, but he's gotten a lot better, and I just want him to explain his thought processes because they look pretty scummy.
##Unvote: Pesco
##Vote: SerelaI believe the coined phrase was "Infected limb versus dead limb."
