Sure you've voiced what you don't like about Raikaria's logic but why would any of this lead to voting Schezo? I think it makes more sense to have voted Raikaria than anyone else.
>spend a couple sentences talking about why Raikaria doesn't look like scum
>vote raikaria
Wut?
To be blunt I voted Schezo over it because that's what you do when the game is trying to get out of rvs. That being said it's not like I -made up- reasons, I totally at least believed what I was saying even if Schezo isn't terribly likely to be scum just from his Raikaria vote
(why wouldn't scum unvote? why would town unvote?)
Because scum inherently worry more about looking weird/drawing attention, usually? Empty unvoting is one of those things that people tend to inherently know Isn't The Best Idea. Scum might do it because they seriously don't know who to vote but in rvs that is so beyond not an issue. Town is IMO more likely to not be worrying so much about this. That being said, in any case it's still just ED1 logic :T
People jumping on NNR because they want him to restate his one~three small posts in not-caps is silly, Dormio's done tons of posting quirks waaay more unreadable then this and people sometimes didn't care a whole lot. (That being said, since it's ed1 this isn't scummy-silly) My opinion on the actual posting quirk is I don't care but a lot of other people do, so ultimately it can't continue without needlessly upsetting/distracting a bunch of people from trying to play to town's wincon. It's one of the most pointless things we could be arguing about right now, y'know :derp:
That being said I still think his vote on me is weird, but "I don't think your vote is good and this is why" not being a case on why someone is bad isn't something I can argue against? I didn't argue "Raikaria is town so you're scum for voting him", I said"Your vote is bad because ____ so I'm voting you for it". I mean, if someone was voting someone else just because they didn't agree about their target, that'd be terrible, yeah. (However since it's ED1 having a weird vote is almost expected, but, I can't justify everything with ed1 because we're still IN ed1 so it'd keep me from getting anywhere)
Raikaria:Oh my god, someone can't be a lurker when the game isn't even 24 hours in. Really, 48 hours isn't enough to properly identity "lurking" from "not being at the computer/anything to say" especially because ED1 is boring stuff. Policy lynching a lurker d1 is terrible anyway because it doesn't tell you jack crap to use as info on d2 (Even if it flips -scum-, which is a diceroll because lynching lurkers on d1 doesn't work)
so
raikaria who would you vote out of people ~*~actually posting~*~
Cut:
Serela could at least explain why he thinks the vote is bad other then saying "Rai is town, therefore Schezo is scum for voting him."
This is what I've been saying I didn't do the whole time?? The reasons I gave for Rai not looking like scum are the reasons Schezo was using to vote him, aka I disagreed with Schezo's reasons for voting Raikaria and thought his vote was bad. (I feel weird talking like this about a vote I barely care about, which brings me to the important subject of Who I Think Should Be Voted)
##Vote RaikariaIt's ironic because I returned my vote to my RVS and my RVS still hasn't posted.
Okay why are you still pushing your RVS vote out of people actually here? Saying it's because he's lurking is a terrible reason for the stuff I said above about going after lurkers d1 (Especially when the game started -less then 24 hours ago-) and because since Polly has not had a chance to do more then a random gamestart vote, you have literally no reason to be sitting on him over other people.
