Gensokyo Holy War Mafia (Game Over)

[WHMZakeri]

The question has always been the beginning.

[Schezo]

Good comment. I thought you looked important Raikaria.

Not. Gyeheh
##Unvote:
##Vote: Raikaria

And I just don't like that opening compared to other games Shadoweh lady gosh!

[Raikaria]

Of course a midboss isn't important. Except who would remember TD Stage 5 without me? Certainly no-one recalls Futo.

[Raikaria]

I correct myself. They don't remember Futo. They remember her boat.

[WHMZakeri]

Of course a midboss isn't important. Except who would remember TD Stage 5 without me? Certainly no-one recalls Futo.

##Unvote: Edible
##Vote: Raikaria

I don't remember stage 5 anyways.

[Pesco]

I only remember Futo-futa.

##Unvote: Edible
##Vote: Raikaria

I don't remember stage 5 anyways.

Not even a jokevote. It's a votepark.

##Unvote
##Vote: Zakeri

[Serela]

##Unvote Affinity ##Vote Zakeri

I mean we should at least be -trying- to segue into slightly more relevant votes rather then continuing these kinds of things forever

[Raikaria]

Indeed, I forgot that we can't have like 2 days of RVS stuff since this isn't a 5 day day phase.

Despite me saying this I'll keep my vote parked because I don't really have a reason to vote anyone else yet.

Actually, never-mind that, I don't want a possible wagon to form on Polaris.

##Unvote

Also I suggest if we cannot come to any conclusions, instead of forcing some random 1v1, we lynch lurkers. If last game taught us anything...

[Schezo]

##Vote: Raikaria

[Raikaria]

##Vote: Raikaria

I fail to understand your sudden urge to re-iterate this,

[NekoNekoRex]

IT MIGHT BE HARD TO DISCERN WHO LURKERS ARE WITH ONLY A 48 HOUR DAY PHASE THOUGH!

YOU MAY AS WELL SUGGEST WE DO A POLICY LYNCH!

SCHEZO IF YOU ARE GOING TO REAFFIRM A VOTE A REASON WOULD BE IDEAL!

##UNVOTE
##VOTE: SHEZO PLEASE EXPLAIN

CUT BY RAIKARIA ASKING THE SAME

[Schezo]

Bad post very bad.

The timer oh my god!!!1!

Don't want any wagons forming while at the same time dat short day!

We need to "waste" the lunch on a lurker today since we probably won't get a good lynch as it will only be a random 1v1.

I think that got everything.

[Schezo]

Nekorex is gay

[NekoNekoRex]

I AM NOT INCLINED TO ECHO PHRASES I DO NOT APPRECIATE

[Schezo]

im gay

Oh wait that's actually me.

[Raikaria]

IT MIGHT BE HARD TO DISCERN WHO LURKERS ARE WITH ONLY A 48 HOUR DAY PHASE THOUGH!

YOU MAY AS WELL SUGGEST WE DO A POLICY LYNCH!

Well if you don't post for 24 hours, usually that's enough to get a prod, and if they don't post anything of any use whatsoever and hardly post, that's probobly enough to say they are lurking.

That said you did say MIGHT. Hopefully no-one is blatantly obviously lurking by the end of a 48 hour Day to the point that enough of the town agrees to lynch them for lurking.

Still, I'm still in 5 day dayphase mode. Let my brain adjust. It seemed logical in my head, even if it doesn't in everyone else's :V

We need to "waste" the lunch on a lurker today since we probably won't get a good lynch as it will only be a random 1v1.

How does suggesting IF there is no sensible lynch, that a lurker lynch is preferable to random 1v1's that always seem to be town v town, bad? I'd rather throw that on the table before that situation arises.

Because that situation always seems to come up every time I play.  By no means am I saying 'OMG WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF TIME LET'S LYNCH A LURKER NAO'. I'm just making a suggestion if it comes down to that now, rather than doing it when it's already in motion and too late to stop.

You're free to take that line of thinking as scum when there was nothing for me to scumread yet, however. It's a starting point of conversation that should hopefully change the thread from RVS to actually hunting scum.

[Raikaria]

Plus maybe if everyone said 'Yeah that's a good idea if people are lurking we'll lynch them' people won't lurk and there's be more content to use to hunt scum.

[Schezo]

Despite me saying this I'll keep my vote parked because I don't really have a reason to vote anyone else yet.

Actually, never-mind that, I don't want a possible wagon to form on Polaris.

there was nothing for me to scumread yet, however. It's a starting point of conversation that should hopefully change the thread from RVS to actually hunting scum.

Wall of bad defending bad.

Because yes we're getting our of RVS by unvoting and not letting wagons form.

Today's lynch please sheep.

[NekoNekoRex]

PLEASE SHEEP!

I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO PROD DODGE IF  I DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD SINCE I MIGHT FALL ASLEEP SHORTLY AND WOULDN'T KNOW WHEN I WOULD BE BACK. BUT  I DIGRESS.

I GUESS YOU HAVE ME BEATEN THERE SCHEZO! (ALTHOUGH CLEARLY THAT WAS A PRIMS IMPERSONATION WHICH MAKES IT FUNNY HE CALLED ME OUT ON IT)

YOU MIGHT BE PUSHING A LITTLE TOO HARD THERE SCHEZO BUT ON THE OTHER HAND IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THERE IS MUCH ELSE TO PUSH AT THE MOMENT...

[Raikaria]

Wall of explaining my thoughts is bad?

Attempting to encourage people to post so there is actually things to use to hunt scum is bad?

Otherwise it just ends up as a bunch of townies posting, and a bunch of scums lurking/minimal activity, and town turns on each other.

Like every single game.

And I think is honestly happening now. Because I always try to get the town moving D1, and get jumped on for doing so.

By people who flip town in the end.

[Schezo]

Ah yes. Getting the town moving by spewing theory and removing any form of pressure that allows us to catch scum.

Unvoting like you did earlier did the opposite of make him want to post since now he has less reason to make content under threat of a wagon.
raikaria RAIKARIA???

[Pesco]

Would lynch NNR because allcaps posts makes me not want to read the post and tryharding in a way that gives scum cover noise..

[Raikaria]

Having the threat of my vote hanging freely also applies pressure of a different kind. Besides, that vote wasn't pressure. It was RVS.

How is saying 'If you don't post we'll lynch you' removing pressure? It puts pressure on the scum to actually contribute. If Scum have to say something and contribute, there is more chance for them to slip. If they slip we can pick up on it and lynch them.

[Pesco]

Make a vote, you threaten someone actively and you can move the vote as per your 'vote hanging freely applying the different pressure'.
Not making a vote, you're being passive. Active and passive threat is better than just a passive threat yo.

[Raikaria]

Make a vote, you threaten someone actively and you can move the vote as per your 'vote hanging freely applying the different pressure'.
Not making a vote, you're being passive. Active and passive threat is better than just a passive threat yo.

Good point.

Except I don't know where to put the vote. I feel bad voting people for no apparent reason. Meh, I'll get over it.

Ah whatever I'll go back to my RVS then. As I hinted before, I think Schezo jumping on me is town v town, not town v scum.

##Vote: Polaris

[Serela]

Except I don't know where to put the vote. I feel bad voting people for no apparent reason. Meh, I'll get over it.

Still practically in RVS, that's what you do right now

##Vote Schezo

Raikaria's logic was p.terrible but I doubt it would come from scum (at least not more likely then it would from town) and why scum would decide to be weird and unvote in almost-rvs when you can freely vote anyone is beyond me; it attracts a good bit of attention for literally no reason

[Edible]

Would lynch NNR because allcaps posts makes me not want to read the post and tryharding in a way that gives scum cover noise..

I'll do you one better.

##unvote
##vote NNR

Your posting quirk ends immediately, please.  Further:

YOU MIGHT BE PUSHING A LITTLE TOO HARD THERE SCHEZO BUT ON THE OTHER HAND IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THERE IS MUCH ELSE TO PUSH AT THE MOMENT...

Saying this while you have a vote on Schezo is really weird.  This combined with your previous post throwing the vote on him in the first place reeks of voteparking.

[NekoNekoRex]

VOTEPARKING!

I SUPPOSE I WILL HAVE TO FIX THAT THEN, NOW THAT I HAVE SOMEONE WORTH PLACING MORE CONVICTION ON:

##UNVOTE
##VOTE: SERELA

SERELA'S VOTE LOOKS LIKE A CHAINSAW. SHE DEFENDS RAIKARIA BUT FAILS TO GIVE A REASON WHY SCHEZO IS WORTH A VOTE. EASY JUMP THAT DOUBLES AS BUDDYING RAIKARIA.

Your posting quirk ends immediately, please.

IF DORMIO CAN DO IT SO CAN I! YAHOO-!

[Serela]

SERELA'S VOTE LOOKS LIKE A CHAINSAW. SHE DEFENDS RAIKARIA BUT FAILS TO GIVE A REASON WHY SCHEZO IS WORTH A VOTE

Isn't "I think your vote is bad" supposed to be one of the most common reasons you vote someone

[WHMZakeri]

The only really bad thing I see is Schezo pushing Raikaria too hard.
Scum bad, not bad bad, or else I would have counted Neko's Poststyle.

##Unvote: Raikaria
##Vote: Schezo

I don't see why you bother to press Rai's claim that we should be aiming for lurkers, especially considering people are still arguing in the last mafia game about punishing bad play to prevent intentional bad play.