I think Bard's vote on me is Scummy because he's painting me as trying to get towncred when I explicitly cautioned against giving people towncred for doing what I was doing, and even though this barely means anything he puts me at L-1 over it instead of just voting his other scumread. Given his second post I'm inclined to believe this wasn't town!Bard doing it for shits and giggles (I personally think his sub out is null, could see him getting frustrated about this from the PoV of scum knowing I'm town).
Shadoweh #76: You're literally voting PX based on what other people were doing with no flips, not based on any actions of his own. This is actually a Scum Case on D1 because you're not forced to justify why the guy you're voting is playing like scum. Is there anything about PX's actual content that's scummy to you?
Serela #79: This is an awful way of judging the alignment since it's easy for scum to post that stuff and you're not considering their content.
RE: Affinity: If we had scum!PX not giving a fuck about the game I would've expected him to keep doing the same weak, empty posts and probably try to actually paint me as scum instead of setting up an unvote. Otherwise it's typical PX, note that I didn't say I'm townreading him but he's low-priority. Do you find PX scummy, on that note?
I don't think you singling out NNR vs me singling out PX is a double standard when PX implied he would have work in the future, not at the exact moment he posted it. PX voters were at least pushing my ED1 post which is more constructive in some way.
Describing the PX overanalysis as "legit" when it's literally extrapolating paragraphs from a vote three hours into the game is pretty ridiculous.
Reminder that I wouldn't have been posting paragraphs without you poking at my vote in the first place. It was literally just "hey, PX's responses disappoint me and are bad enough for an ED1 scumread, I like keeping my vote down here atm" not "guys we're lynching PX D1 he's obvscum".
Got distracted by AGDQ yesterday and then way way way way way overslept today.
I don't normally watch speedruns and stuff but I want to see the Gimmick! run tomorrow because that game is sick :>
Conq is being gung-ho without AtE or folding under pressure; don't really find him scummy or think the BT vote is unreasonable for town to make once my wagon became stale. At the same time I find the BT case weak too. How is he defending me in a scummy way? Don't really want to lynch either. On that note, I agree with Conq about NNR. BT suggesting we policy lynch NNR is a terrible idea since any attempt to analyze from his flip is WIFOM. Policy vig, though, sure. If you're just using the threat of policy lynch as rhetoric to push your NNR case then you should probably admit to it and stop.
Prefer Dorian slot lynch, want more from Affinity but he rubs me the wrong way.
Shadoweh and Serela have Questionable Logic in ways I find scummy. More Serela than Shadoweh, Shadoweh reads give me lazytown!Shadoweh vibes but the Serela logic I quoted is the kind of meaningless, poorly-reasoned filler I've come to expect from scum!Serela. Also I hate having to use meta to read people when they do dumb shit.
Hero cut: not a scumclaim, I'm just saying that I was acting in a way that is par for the course in a game of Mafia, since scum do it every game.