Stood up way too friggin' late and got curfew'd without warning.
##UnvoteUnwilling to continue the whole Quiche thing, but like I said, this sort of obtuseness also came from somebody with a similar playstyle before as scum, so I'm not willing to give him any town cred for it, he'd better earn it if he doesn't want me to focus on him anymore.
Anyway, the pillow has spoken and an epiphany came while I was falling asleep. Perhaps 13 Eyes' stuff since doesn't match up with the theory 100%, but I'll comment on it anyway since behavioural disconnects are pretty bad no matter where he placed his vote in the end.
My questioning of Quiche starts with his #107. He finally posts content and when I demand more due to the scarcity and succintness of it, he starts twitterposting. Like Nuko points in in its
#123: "Anyway, I think Lord Pumkin is currently digging himself in a hole right now. I'm tempted to vote him", he's making himself an easy target. I keep pressing him, Alice quickly forgets about him and Milfall doesn't seem to like the issue, and when 13 Eyes appears, he posts
#134.
Take a good look at that post. He comments on people giving up actual content to scumhunt and pretty much aiming after easy targets,
and then proceeds to question the easiest target at the time. Specially considering that Quiche was very, very obviously suffering from reactance bias and he wasn't going to get anywhere with it, even after I advised him to just focus on the rest of the game and get a case to see if Quiche updated his read after that, which would actually get him to do or not do something that could give us a better idea on him. And by the way, he never presented a case either, he just proceeded to gut vote on
Aaaa, who should be popping up real soon to avoid a prod and who already had votes starting to pile up on him.
If I had to choose anybody to hang over actual reasons so far, it'd be Eyes. But again, meta makes me reluctant seeing that the player is likely one to settle with gut reads over actual scumhunting. And the behavioural tell isn't that terrible, except...
Now join me in the quest for actual scum or else! (Danbooru warning)
Yeah, that "Hey, look at me, I'm scumhunting!" thing. I'd be fine with his lynch if it weren't due to the terrible people on his wagon.
Still commenting on other stuffs.
My own gut pointed towards Milfall and Alice last night (yes, I know I've expressed liking for Alice before, but town reads, specially early ones with little to them, make me all the more wary). After what Alice pointed out regarding Milfall's vote on Pyoa Aaaa, I've started to develop some dislike towards her, and I would want to see more by her if she doesn't want me to be fine with her lynch over a single small thing.
That said, I also feel distrustful of Alice. While pressing Quiche back in #118 and #121 would also be the townie thing to do if she thought Quiche was playing badly as town, she seemed to have intent to vote for him, she also explained that she still preferred lynching Pope over the lords so that's not really the issue. The issue is more like it could also be seen as cheerleading Quiche's lynch if I stop being distracted by the adorable for a moment. I might just be getting paranoid over my town reads, but I guess that's still better than considering them solid and confirmation bias into a loss due to a D1 read. This questioning leads me to not quite like the things with Milfall or Dechronos even though they sound perfectly reasonable, I guess I'll just wait for moar posts.
Cut by Nuko and Dechronos.
Alarm clock set. Mafia is important business.
Bunny, do you have nothing to say regarding what Alice mentioned about your Pleiades FoS?
Will try to decide what to do with my vote now. I'd definitely be voting 13 Eyes if his wagon didn't rub me the wrong way, and I want to see what Pope has to say about recent events.