I am with the school of thought that thinks Serela should be given a chance to prove his role tonight. Content-wise, he is still banal and needs to update his opinions on other people, but whatever.
##Unvote##Vote: ShadyKI'm pretty baffled by his arbitrary PoE
in this post (e.g I happen to think X and Y as iffy but town but oh I'm left with two people and I need to vote one of them) as a reason to vote Anthy when he hadn't looked at him before, and I suppose I can level the same accusation at him as I did against IHNM with this post; that he is randomly heaving his weight on wagons for weak reasoning. ShadyK, if you are onto him for obvious D1 reasons that anyone could pick up without a reread, why didn't you suspect him at the beginning of D2? Same goes with his other actions of being 'easily influenced' in voting Serela and IHNM (even asking why he shouldn't be lynched at this point), only to suddenly think he is town for no reason. Combined with what I raised early D2, I suppose I prefer his lynch today.
On Anthy, I think his posts, apart from the fact that he makes no votes, are decent and original (e.g early D2 ShadyK stance, ICE stance D1 which I agreed with, etc.). While I somewhat understand his reasons for not voting in his first D2 post, his refusal to do so in subsequent posts strikes me as outright refusing to pick a stance and stick to it despite having the materials (e.g him noticing that IHNM and ShadyK jumped on his wagon) to do so. And all this after his confident ICE vote at the beginning of yesterday, which is off-putting. Anthy, would you mind telling us why you were so willing to vote ICE in D1 but not willing to vote anyone today? There's also the thing where the votes on him with the exception of huhwhat's have no reasoning to them at all, and I'm mainly getting the vibe that he's just someone who (wrongfully) does not take much value into votes. In the end, he's still a viable choice, if only because he didn't vote most of today and late D1, although my least favourite one for the above reasons.
I think Dormio's early D2 is admirable in his reasonable vote for IHNM and reasonable change to Serela, which strikes me as scumhunting. Not sure what to think of his telegraphed Shadoweh vote at the end, which seems reasonable enough discounting ShadowICE's mason claim, but I think him town in his actions despite his weak late D1.
huhwhat has been mostly pro-town looking for today in his constant questioning and stuff, but he has been iffy-looking on IHNM and ShadyK, defending them for what I see as inadequate reasons
Here he says that IHNM is the 'worst-looking wagon' even though he admitted that IHNM posted reads without justification, but he did not suspect anyone on the wagon other than Serela, and did not do anything to convince the people who were on that wagon, only offering reasoning when
prompted. Also, he clears ShadyK for his 'softclaim' alone, which strikes me as somewhat weird and selective. Would like him to elaborate on this. Other than that he's mostly solid, but a IHNM, ShadyK flip will tell us more about him.
I'm still completely disgusted by IHNM frequent changes in opinion prompted by frequent 'rereads' and other excuses, While his case on me seems more like scumhunting compared to his previous votes, his Anthy vote came entirely out of nowhere and went from 'unmemorable' to 'lynchable' without any justification. That said, credit should be given when credit is due with his reasonable vote on me, which I guess makes me feel slightly better about him when compared to ShadyK.
